Fix Markdown lint issues (#8929)

#8896 Broke the static analysis CI.  Fixing so CI passes
This commit is contained in:
Travis Plunk
2019-02-20 13:24:26 -08:00
committed by GitHub
parent b06ad6aa61
commit 2c488fb4e5
6 changed files with 29 additions and 32 deletions
+15 -12
View File
@@ -2,17 +2,20 @@
## Terms
* [**PowerShell Committee**](#powershell-committee): A committee of project owners who are responsible for design decisions, approving [RFCs][RFC-repo], and approving new maintainers/committee members
* [**PowerShell Committee**](#powershell-committee): A committee of project owners who are responsible for design decisions,
approving [RFCs][RFC-repo], and approving new maintainers/committee members
* [**Repository maintainer**](#repository-maintainers): An individual responsible for merging pull requests (PRs) into `master` when all requirements are met (code review, tests, docs, and RFC approval as applicable).
Repository Maintainers are the only people with write permissions for the `master` branch.
Repository Maintainers are the only people with write permissions for the `master` branch.
* [**Area experts**](#area-experts): People who are experts for specific components (e.g. PSReadline, the parser) or technologies (e.g. security, performance).
Area experts are responsible for code reviews, issue triage, and providing their expertise to others.
* **Corporation**: The Corporation owns the PowerShell repository and, under extreme circumstances, reserves the right to dissolve or reform the PowerShell Committee, the Project Leads, and the Corporate Maintainer.
The Corporation for PowerShell is Microsoft.
* **Corporate Maintainer**: The Corporate Maintainer is an entity, person or set of persons, with the ability to veto decisions made by the PowerShell Committee or any other collaborators on the PowerShell project.
This veto power will be used with restraint since it is intended that the community drive the project.
The Corporate Maintainer is determined by the Corporation both initially and in continuation.
The initial Corporate Maintainer for PowerShell is Jeffrey Snover ([jpsnover](https://github.com/jpsnover)).
Area experts are responsible for code reviews, issue triage, and providing their expertise to others.
* **Corporation**: The Corporation owns the PowerShell repository and, under extreme circumstances,
reserves the right to dissolve or reform the PowerShell Committee, the Project Leads, and the Corporate Maintainer.
The Corporation for PowerShell is Microsoft.
* **Corporate Maintainer**: The Corporate Maintainer is an entity, person or set of persons,
with the ability to veto decisions made by the PowerShell Committee or any other collaborators on the PowerShell project.
This veto power will be used with restraint since it is intended that the community drive the project.
The Corporate Maintainer is determined by the Corporation both initially and in continuation.
The initial Corporate Maintainer for PowerShell is Jeffrey Snover ([jpsnover](https://github.com/jpsnover)).
* [**RFC process**][RFC-repo]: The "review-for-comment" (RFC) process whereby design decisions get made.
## PowerShell Committee
@@ -57,7 +60,7 @@ If any Committee Members feels like this behavior is large enough to warrant an
As a PowerShell Committee Member:
1. **DO** reply to issues and pull requests with design opinions
(this could include offering support for good work or exciting new features)
(this could include offering support for good work or exciting new features)
1. **DO** encourage healthy discussion about the direction of PowerShell
1. **DO** raise "red flags" on PRs that haven't followed the proper RFC process when applicable
1. **DO** contribute to documentation and best practices
@@ -68,7 +71,7 @@ As a PowerShell Committee Member:
1. **DON'T** constantly raise "red flags" for unimportant or minor problems to the point that the progress of the project is being slowed
1. **DON'T** offer up your opinions as the absolute opinion of the PowerShell Committee.
Members are encouraged to share their opinions, but they should be presented as such.
Members are encouraged to share their opinions, but they should be presented as such.
### PowerShell Committee Membership
@@ -109,7 +112,7 @@ If you are an Area Expert:
1. **DO** assign yourself to issues labeled with your area of expertise
1. **DO** code reviews for issues where you're assigned or in your areas of expertise.
1. **DO** reply to new issues and pull requests that are related to your area of expertise
(while reviewing PRs, leave your comment even if everything looks good - a simple "Looks good to me" or "LGTM" will suffice, so that we know someone has already taken a look at it).
(while reviewing PRs, leave your comment even if everything looks good - a simple "Looks good to me" or "LGTM" will suffice, so that we know someone has already taken a look at it).
1. **DO** make sure contributors are following the [contributor guidelines](../../.github/CONTRIBUTING.md).
1. **DO** ask people to resend a pull request, if it [doesn't target `master`](../../.github/CONTRIBUTING.md#lifecycle-of-a-pull-request).
1. **DO** ensure that contributors [write Pester tests][pester] for all new/changed functionality