mirror of
https://github.com/PowerShell/PowerShell
synced 2026-06-08 12:12:50 +00:00
Fix Markdown lint issues (#8929)
#8896 Broke the static analysis CI. Fixing so CI passes
This commit is contained in:
@@ -2,17 +2,20 @@
|
||||
|
||||
## Terms
|
||||
|
||||
* [**PowerShell Committee**](#powershell-committee): A committee of project owners who are responsible for design decisions, approving [RFCs][RFC-repo], and approving new maintainers/committee members
|
||||
* [**PowerShell Committee**](#powershell-committee): A committee of project owners who are responsible for design decisions,
|
||||
approving [RFCs][RFC-repo], and approving new maintainers/committee members
|
||||
* [**Repository maintainer**](#repository-maintainers): An individual responsible for merging pull requests (PRs) into `master` when all requirements are met (code review, tests, docs, and RFC approval as applicable).
|
||||
Repository Maintainers are the only people with write permissions for the `master` branch.
|
||||
Repository Maintainers are the only people with write permissions for the `master` branch.
|
||||
* [**Area experts**](#area-experts): People who are experts for specific components (e.g. PSReadline, the parser) or technologies (e.g. security, performance).
|
||||
Area experts are responsible for code reviews, issue triage, and providing their expertise to others.
|
||||
* **Corporation**: The Corporation owns the PowerShell repository and, under extreme circumstances, reserves the right to dissolve or reform the PowerShell Committee, the Project Leads, and the Corporate Maintainer.
|
||||
The Corporation for PowerShell is Microsoft.
|
||||
* **Corporate Maintainer**: The Corporate Maintainer is an entity, person or set of persons, with the ability to veto decisions made by the PowerShell Committee or any other collaborators on the PowerShell project.
|
||||
This veto power will be used with restraint since it is intended that the community drive the project.
|
||||
The Corporate Maintainer is determined by the Corporation both initially and in continuation.
|
||||
The initial Corporate Maintainer for PowerShell is Jeffrey Snover ([jpsnover](https://github.com/jpsnover)).
|
||||
Area experts are responsible for code reviews, issue triage, and providing their expertise to others.
|
||||
* **Corporation**: The Corporation owns the PowerShell repository and, under extreme circumstances,
|
||||
reserves the right to dissolve or reform the PowerShell Committee, the Project Leads, and the Corporate Maintainer.
|
||||
The Corporation for PowerShell is Microsoft.
|
||||
* **Corporate Maintainer**: The Corporate Maintainer is an entity, person or set of persons,
|
||||
with the ability to veto decisions made by the PowerShell Committee or any other collaborators on the PowerShell project.
|
||||
This veto power will be used with restraint since it is intended that the community drive the project.
|
||||
The Corporate Maintainer is determined by the Corporation both initially and in continuation.
|
||||
The initial Corporate Maintainer for PowerShell is Jeffrey Snover ([jpsnover](https://github.com/jpsnover)).
|
||||
* [**RFC process**][RFC-repo]: The "review-for-comment" (RFC) process whereby design decisions get made.
|
||||
|
||||
## PowerShell Committee
|
||||
@@ -57,7 +60,7 @@ If any Committee Members feels like this behavior is large enough to warrant an
|
||||
As a PowerShell Committee Member:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **DO** reply to issues and pull requests with design opinions
|
||||
(this could include offering support for good work or exciting new features)
|
||||
(this could include offering support for good work or exciting new features)
|
||||
1. **DO** encourage healthy discussion about the direction of PowerShell
|
||||
1. **DO** raise "red flags" on PRs that haven't followed the proper RFC process when applicable
|
||||
1. **DO** contribute to documentation and best practices
|
||||
@@ -68,7 +71,7 @@ As a PowerShell Committee Member:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **DON'T** constantly raise "red flags" for unimportant or minor problems to the point that the progress of the project is being slowed
|
||||
1. **DON'T** offer up your opinions as the absolute opinion of the PowerShell Committee.
|
||||
Members are encouraged to share their opinions, but they should be presented as such.
|
||||
Members are encouraged to share their opinions, but they should be presented as such.
|
||||
|
||||
### PowerShell Committee Membership
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -109,7 +112,7 @@ If you are an Area Expert:
|
||||
1. **DO** assign yourself to issues labeled with your area of expertise
|
||||
1. **DO** code reviews for issues where you're assigned or in your areas of expertise.
|
||||
1. **DO** reply to new issues and pull requests that are related to your area of expertise
|
||||
(while reviewing PRs, leave your comment even if everything looks good - a simple "Looks good to me" or "LGTM" will suffice, so that we know someone has already taken a look at it).
|
||||
(while reviewing PRs, leave your comment even if everything looks good - a simple "Looks good to me" or "LGTM" will suffice, so that we know someone has already taken a look at it).
|
||||
1. **DO** make sure contributors are following the [contributor guidelines](../../.github/CONTRIBUTING.md).
|
||||
1. **DO** ask people to resend a pull request, if it [doesn't target `master`](../../.github/CONTRIBUTING.md#lifecycle-of-a-pull-request).
|
||||
1. **DO** ensure that contributors [write Pester tests][pester] for all new/changed functionality
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user