From c6d622edf97697738ec172b8d2c179a6538f831c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dobin Rutishauser Date: Wed, 21 May 2025 12:00:45 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] doc: fix --- README.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/README.md b/README.md index 183fe34..e0bc053 100644 --- a/README.md +++ b/README.md @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ The "metasploit" does not execute the shellcode, only decodes and prints it. Conclusion: * The type of encoding/encryption doesnt matter * More important is if a windows API is being used/imported (static analysis, e.g. IAT in PE) -* Note that NO obfuscation metasploit outperforms AES encryption, base64 windows api, ip-, mac- and uuid-encoding +* Note that the "NO-obfuscation" (plaintext) metasploit outperforms AES encryption, base64 windows api, ip-, mac- and uuid-encoding * VirusTotal has maybe one memory scanner. The rest seem to be static analysis. | **What** | **Library** | **Includes** | **Function / IAT** | **Random** | **Metasploit** |