mirror of
https://github.com/mirror/processhacker
synced 2026-06-08 16:03:24 +00:00
dmex
b74a3b3b7e
git-svn-id: svn://svn.code.sf.net/p/processhacker/code@4723 21ef857c-d57f-4fe0-8362-d861dc6d29cd
79 lines
4.2 KiB
PHP
79 lines
4.2 KiB
PHP
<?php $pagetitle = "FAQ"; include("header.php"); ?>
|
|
|
|
<div class="page">
|
|
<div class="yui-d0">
|
|
<div id="watermark" class="watermark-apps-portlet">
|
|
<div class="flowed-block">
|
|
<img alt="" width="64" height="64" src="./images/logo.png">
|
|
</div>
|
|
|
|
<div class="flowed-block wide">
|
|
<h2>Process Hacker</h2>
|
|
|
|
<ul class="facetmenu">
|
|
<li><a href="/">Overview</a></li>
|
|
<li><a href="/features.php">Features</a></li>
|
|
<li><a href="/screenshots.php">Screenshots</a></li>
|
|
<li><a href="/downloads.php">Downloads</a></li>
|
|
<li class="overview active"><a href="/faq.php">FAQ</a></li>
|
|
<li><a href="/about.php">About</a></li>
|
|
<li><a href="/forums/">Forum</a></li>
|
|
</ul>
|
|
</div>
|
|
</div>
|
|
|
|
<div class="yui-t4">
|
|
<div class="top-portlet">
|
|
<div class="summary">
|
|
<strong>Why should I use Process Hacker? Why not Process Explorer or some other program?</strong>
|
|
<p>Process Hacker offers some pretty unique features, like an awesome run-as tool and
|
|
the ability to find and terminate hidden processes. The intended users are developers and
|
|
people interested in Windows internals. This tool is NOT intended for general system
|
|
optimization.</p>
|
|
|
|
<strong>"Process Hacker"? Is this a dangerous "hacking" tool?</strong>
|
|
<p>Please read about the <a href="http://catb.org/~esr/faqs/hacker-howto.html#what_is">correct definition of "hacker"</a>.</p>
|
|
|
|
<strong>Why is there annoying bug X in Process Hacker? Why is Process Hacker missing feature Y?</strong>
|
|
<p>Please report any bugs to our <a href="https://sourceforge.net/tracker2/?group_id=242527">tracker</a>.
|
|
Feature requests should be posted in the <a href="/forums">forums</a>.</p>
|
|
|
|
<strong>Is Process Hacker a portable application?</strong>
|
|
<p>Yes. If you want settings to be saved on your USB drive, create a file named
|
|
"ProcessHacker.exe.settings.xml" in the same directory as ProcessHacker.exe. Settings will then
|
|
automatically be saved there.</p>
|
|
|
|
<strong>Symbols don't work properly!</strong>
|
|
<p>Firstly, you need the latest <code>dbghelp.dll</code> version. Install
|
|
<a href="http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/devtools/debugging/installx86.mspx">Debugging Tools
|
|
for Windows</a>, open Process Hacker options, click on Symbols, and locate <code>dbghelp.dll</code>.
|
|
It is usually in <code>C:\Program Files\Debugging Tools for Windows (x86)</code>. Next, you need
|
|
to configure the search path. If you don't know what to do, enter
|
|
<code>SRV*SOME_FOLDER*http://msdl.microsoft.com/download/symbols</code>.
|
|
Replace <code>SOME_FOLDER</code> with any folder you can write to, like <code>D:\Symbols</code>.
|
|
Now you can restart Process Hacker and view full symbols.</p>
|
|
|
|
<strong>Why can't I build Process Hacker?</strong>
|
|
<p>The most likely problem is that you do not have the latest
|
|
<a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/bb980924.aspx">Windows SDK</a> installed.</p>
|
|
|
|
<strong>Process Hacker can kill my anti-virus software! Is this a bug in the anti-virus software?</strong>
|
|
<p>No. Please do not report these incidents as bugs because you will be wasting their time.</p>
|
|
|
|
<strong>My anti-virus software reports Process Hacker as a threat!</strong>
|
|
<p>This is an expected part of the FUD (fear, uncertainty and doubt) campaigns of anti-virus companies
|
|
like Kaspersky Lab, who want to scare their users as much as possible. This is completely
|
|
misleading and irresponsible, but is typical of the "security industry". The source code of
|
|
Process Hacker is available; verify and build the code yourself if you do not trust the binary
|
|
releases.</p>
|
|
|
|
<strong>Anti-cheat software reports Process Hacker as a game cheating tool!</strong>
|
|
<p>As with anti-virus FUD campaigns, this is similarly ridiculous. Unfortunately there is nothing much that can be done about this.</p>
|
|
</div>
|
|
</div>
|
|
</div>
|
|
</div>
|
|
</div>
|
|
</div>
|
|
|
|
<?php include("footer.php"); ?>
|