From b8f968b4a31b4861417d976a18a9d27364a35faa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Yukihiro \"Matz\" Matsumoto" <matz@ruby.or.jp>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2024 08:48:11 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] numeric.c (mrb_cmp): no need to check `respond_to?(:<=>)`

Because every object responds to `<=>`.
---
 src/numeric.c | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/src/numeric.c b/src/numeric.c
index fd607a1b4..e0cd255ef 100644
--- a/src/numeric.c
+++ b/src/numeric.c
@@ -2039,7 +2039,6 @@ mrb_cmp(mrb_state *mrb, mrb_value obj1, mrb_value obj2)
       return -2;
     return mrb_str_cmp(mrb, obj1, obj2);
   default:
-    if (!mrb_respond_to(mrb, obj1, MRB_OPSYM(cmp))) return -2;
     v = mrb_funcall_argv(mrb, obj1, MRB_OPSYM(cmp), 1, &obj2);
     if (mrb_nil_p(v) || !mrb_integer_p(v))
       return -2;