`ExprNode` and its child classes use LLVM-style RTTI.
Until now their destruction was not handled properly, causing the
constructor-destructor type mismatch warnings on ASAN.
Despite this all the code was working properly, but just for luck,
because of the fact that these classes are very shallow.
This commit fixes the issue, and allow `ExprNode` and its child classes
to be extended without worrying about wrong destructors being invoked.
Replicate the changes made by this commit
f2a0df309f78e1b5d7c5f81ada5110523644559e perfomed by Pietro on the
branch containing the development fixes for `revng-c`.
`BasicBlockNode` and `RegionCFG` classes are now template classes. This
means that the `BasicBlockNode` class can be used as a generic wrapper
for any type of object in the original graph (it is usually used to wrap
a `llvm::BasicBlock *` for decompilation purposes, but in tests it can
be used to wrap a `DotNode` object) that implementes `GraphTraits`.
We now match the `IfCheckNode` trees created by the dispatchers
insertion as an unique switch.
To this we introduced a new `SwitchCheckNode` AST type, which cannot
inherith from the `SwitchNode` since the underlying container for the
`case`s is different (the index is saved as an `unsigned`, while instead
in the `SwitchNode` we use a `ConstantInt *`.
The condition inside the `IfNode`s are now represented using a custom
`ExprNode` object, which has a new hierarchy of possible nodes present
in an expression (`not`, `and` and `or`).
Moved the `flipEmptyThen` post-processing inside the beautify pass.
The ownership of the `ExprNode` is kept inside the `ASTTree` object.
This means that during the flattening we also need to transfer these
objects and to adjust the pointers inside the `IfNode`s.
Remove the pointer to the corresponding `BasicBlockNode` inside each
`ASTNode`.
We now keep directly a pointer to the original `llvm::BasicBlock`.
To do this we need to explicitly mantain some information, like the
emptyness of the node (dummy node in the `RegionCFG`).
Some little changes (like the way we retrieve the CFGNode corresponding
to an ASTNode) in the flattening have been necessary too.
Remove from the `IfEqualNode` the reference to the BBNode corresponding
to the original `switch`, since we cannot have the guarantee that this
node will remain allocated in the same place (the pointer could be
invalidated).
Also insert other fixes.
Pietro Fezzardi