mirror of
https://github.com/splunk/security_content
synced 2026-06-08 17:32:49 +00:00
Merge branch 'develop' into inspired_2194
This commit is contained in:
@@ -426,6 +426,11 @@ jobs:
|
||||
source venv/bin/activate
|
||||
python3 contentctl.py -p . docgen -o docs
|
||||
|
||||
- name: Run reporting
|
||||
run: |
|
||||
source venv/bin/activate
|
||||
python3 contentctl.py -p . reporting
|
||||
|
||||
- name: Update github with new docs and package bits
|
||||
run: |
|
||||
rm -rf dist
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
|
||||
name: Splunk Command and Scripting Interpreter Risky SPL MLTK Baseline
|
||||
id: 273df2f7-643a-451a-8d4d-637e39eadc87
|
||||
version: 1
|
||||
date: '2022-05-27'
|
||||
author: Abhinav Mishra, Kumar Sharad and Xiao Lin, Splunk
|
||||
type: Baseline
|
||||
datamodel:
|
||||
- Splunk_Audit
|
||||
description: 'This search supports an analyst looking for abuse or misuse of the risky commands listed here: https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/latest/Security/SPLsafeguards#Commands_that_trigger_the_warning
|
||||
This is accomplished by using the time spent executing one of these risky commands as a proxy for misuse/abuse of interest during investigation and/or hunting.
|
||||
The search builds a model utilizes the MLTK DensityFunction algorithm on Splunk app audit log data. The model uses the past 7 days of user history executing the above referenced commands then aggregates the total search run time for each hour as indicator of user behavior.
|
||||
The model identifies the top 0.1% of user search run time, indicating a risky use of these commands. Users can adjust this threshold 0.1% as interested however this will correlate to missed/false positive rates. This search should be scheduled to run at least every 7 days. The name of machine learning model generated is "risky_command_abuse" and should be configured to be globally shared (not private) in MLTK app as documented here:
|
||||
https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/MLApp/5.3.1/User/Models#Sharing_models_from_other_Splunk_apps
|
||||
unless the same account of training this model will be used to perform inference using this model for anomaly
|
||||
detection.'
|
||||
search: '| tstats sum(Search_Activity.total_run_time) as run_time, count
|
||||
FROM datamodel=Splunk_Audit.Search_Activity WHERE (Search_Activity.user!="")
|
||||
AND (Search_Activity.total_run_time>1) AND (earliest=-7d@d latest=now)
|
||||
AND (Search_Activity.search IN ("*| runshellscript *", "*| collect *","*| delete *", "*| fit *", "*| outputcsv *",
|
||||
"*| outputlookup *", "*| run *", "*| script *", "*| sendalert *", "*| sendemail *", "*| tscolle*"))
|
||||
AND (Search_Activity.search_type=adhoc) AND (Search_Activity.user!=splunk-system-user)
|
||||
BY _time, Search_Activity.user span=1h
|
||||
| fit DensityFunction "run_time" dist=auto lower_threshold=0.000001 upper_threshold=0.001 show_density=true
|
||||
by Search_Activity.user into "risky_command_abuse" '
|
||||
how_to_implement: The corresponding detection of using this model is "Splunk Command and Scripting Interpreter Risky
|
||||
SPL MLTK". This detection depends on MLTK app which can be found here - https://splunkbase.splunk.com/app/2890/
|
||||
and it assumes Splunk accelerated audit data model is available. For large enterprises, training the model might
|
||||
take significant computing resources. It might require dedicated search head. The underlined machine learning
|
||||
algorithm this detection used is DensityFunction. It might need to increase its settings default values, such as
|
||||
max_fit_time, max_groups, etc. More details of achieving optimal performance and configuring DensityFunction
|
||||
parameters can be found here - https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/MLApp/5.3.1/User/Configurefitandapply
|
||||
Users can modify earliest=-7d@d in the search to other value so that the search can collect enough data points
|
||||
to build a good baseline model. Users can also modify list of risky commands in "Search_Activity.search IN" to better
|
||||
suit users' violation policy and their usage environment.
|
||||
known_false_positives: If the run time of a search exceeds the boundaries of outlier defined by the fitted density
|
||||
function model, false positives can occur, incorrectly labeling a long running search as potentially risky.
|
||||
references:
|
||||
- https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/latest/Security/SPLsafeguards#Commands_that_trigger_the_warning
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
analytic_story:
|
||||
- Splunk Vulnerabilities
|
||||
asset_type: Web Server
|
||||
cis20:
|
||||
- CIS 3
|
||||
- CIS 6
|
||||
confidence: 40
|
||||
cve:
|
||||
- CVE-2022-32154
|
||||
context:
|
||||
- Source: Endpoint
|
||||
dataset:
|
||||
- https://github.com/splunk/attack_data/raw/master/datasets/attack_techniques/T1203/search_activity.txt
|
||||
impact: 50
|
||||
kill_chain_phases:
|
||||
- Actions on Objectives
|
||||
message: ML model "risky_command_abuse" training is completed.
|
||||
mitre_attack_id:
|
||||
- T1059
|
||||
nist:
|
||||
- DE.AE
|
||||
observable:
|
||||
- name: user
|
||||
type: User
|
||||
role:
|
||||
- Victim
|
||||
product:
|
||||
- Splunk Enterprise
|
||||
- Splunk Enterprise Security
|
||||
- Splunk Cloud
|
||||
required_fields:
|
||||
- _time
|
||||
- Search_Activity.search
|
||||
- Search_Activity.total_run_time
|
||||
- Search_Activity.user
|
||||
- Search_Activity.search_type
|
||||
risk_score: 20
|
||||
security_domain: audit
|
||||
detections:
|
||||
- Splunk Command and Scripting Interpreter Risky SPL MLTK
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ class DataModel(enum.Enum):
|
||||
Endpoint_Filesystem = 14
|
||||
Endpoint_Registry = 15
|
||||
Risk = 16
|
||||
Splunk_Audit = 17
|
||||
|
||||
class SecurityContentType(enum.Enum):
|
||||
detections = 1
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -36,7 +36,6 @@ class ObjToJsonAdapter(Adapter):
|
||||
obj_array.append(story.dict(exclude_none=True,
|
||||
exclude =
|
||||
{
|
||||
"detections": True,
|
||||
"investigations": True
|
||||
}
|
||||
))
|
||||
|
||||
+7
-3
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ tags:
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
{% if object.experimental is sameas true -%}
|
||||
### ⚠️ WARNING THIS IS A EXPERIMENTAL object
|
||||
### :warning: WARNING THIS IS A EXPERIMENTAL analytic
|
||||
We have not been able to test, simulate, or build datasets for this object. Use at your own risk. This analytic is **NOT** supported.
|
||||
{% endif %}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ We have not been able to test, simulate, or build datasets for this object. Use
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
</details>
|
||||
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
{{ object.search|replace("|", "\n|")|safe }}
|
||||
@@ -150,7 +150,8 @@ The SPL above uses the following Macros:
|
||||
{% endfor %}
|
||||
{% endif -%}
|
||||
|
||||
Note that **{{object.name | lower | replace(" ", "_") }}_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> **{{object.name | lower | replace(" ", "_") }}_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
|
||||
{% if object.lookups -%}
|
||||
#### Lookups
|
||||
@@ -186,6 +187,9 @@ The SPL above uses the following Lookups:
|
||||
| {{(object.tags.impact * object.tags.confidence)/100}} | {{ object.tags.impact }} | {{ object.tags.confidence }} | {{object.tags.message}} |
|
||||
{% endif %}
|
||||
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> The Risk Score is calculated by the following formula: Risk Score = (Impact * Confidence/100). Initial Confidence and Impact is set by the analytic author.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Reference
|
||||
{% if object.references %}
|
||||
{% for reference in object.references -%}
|
||||
|
||||
+14
-1
@@ -41,7 +41,20 @@ class SecurityContentStoryBuilder(StoryBuilder):
|
||||
for detection_analytic_story in detection.tags.analytic_story:
|
||||
if detection_analytic_story == self.story.name:
|
||||
matched_detection_names.append(str('ESCU - ' + detection.name + ' - Rule'))
|
||||
matched_detections.append(detection)
|
||||
# SSE-638: detections object should at least contain the name attribute.
|
||||
# We also need a minimal set of the following attributes to satisfy docgen (doc_stories.j2):
|
||||
# name, source, type, tags.mitre_attack_enrichments.mitre_attack_technique
|
||||
mitre_attack_enrichments_list = []
|
||||
if (detection.tags.mitre_attack_enrichments):
|
||||
for attack in detection.tags.mitre_attack_enrichments:
|
||||
mitre_attack_enrichments_list.append({"mitre_attack_technique": attack.mitre_attack_technique})
|
||||
tags_obj = {"mitre_attack_enrichments": mitre_attack_enrichments_list}
|
||||
matched_detections.append({
|
||||
"name": detection.name,
|
||||
"source": detection.source,
|
||||
"type": detection.type,
|
||||
"tags": tags_obj
|
||||
})
|
||||
datamodels.update(detection.datamodel)
|
||||
if detection.tags.kill_chain_phases:
|
||||
kill_chain_phases.update(detection.tags.kill_chain_phases)
|
||||
|
||||
+172
-160
@@ -1,18 +1,30 @@
|
||||
mitre_id,technique,tactics,groups
|
||||
T1647,Plist File Modification,Defense Evasion,no
|
||||
T1622,Debugger Evasion,Defense Evasion|Discovery,no
|
||||
T1621,Multi-Factor Authentication Request Generation,Credential Access,APT29
|
||||
T1505.005,Terminal Services DLL,Persistence,no
|
||||
T1557.003,DHCP Spoofing,Credential Access|Collection,no
|
||||
T1595.003,Wordlist Scanning,Reconnaissance,Volatile Cedar
|
||||
T1098.005,Device Registration,Persistence,APT29
|
||||
T1574.013,KernelCallbackTable,Persistence|Privilege Escalation|Defense Evasion,Lazarus Group
|
||||
T1556.005,Reversible Encryption,Credential Access|Defense Evasion|Persistence,no
|
||||
T1055.015,ListPlanting,Defense Evasion|Privilege Escalation,no
|
||||
T1564.010,Process Argument Spoofing,Defense Evasion,no
|
||||
T1564.009,Resource Forking,Defense Evasion,no
|
||||
T1559.003,XPC Services,Execution,no
|
||||
T1562.010,Downgrade Attack,Defense Evasion,no
|
||||
T1547.015,Login Items,Persistence|Privilege Escalation,no
|
||||
T1620,Reflective Code Loading,Defense Evasion,no
|
||||
T1620,Reflective Code Loading,Defense Evasion,Lazarus Group
|
||||
T1619,Cloud Storage Object Discovery,Discovery,no
|
||||
T1218.014,MMC,Defense Evasion,no
|
||||
T1218.013,Mavinject,Defense Evasion,no
|
||||
T1614.001,System Language Discovery,Discovery,no
|
||||
T1614.001,System Language Discovery,Discovery,Ke3chang|Lazarus Group
|
||||
T1615,Group Policy Discovery,Discovery,Turla
|
||||
T1036.007,Double File Extension,Defense Evasion,Mustang Panda
|
||||
T1562.009,Safe Mode Boot,Defense Evasion,no
|
||||
T1564.008,Email Hiding Rules,Defense Evasion,FIN4
|
||||
T1505.004,IIS Components,Persistence,no
|
||||
T1027.006,HTML Smuggling,Defense Evasion,no
|
||||
T1027.006,HTML Smuggling,Defense Evasion,APT29
|
||||
T1213.003,Code Repositories,Collection,APT29
|
||||
T1553.006,Code Signing Policy Modification,Defense Evasion,Turla|APT39
|
||||
T1614,System Location Discovery,Discovery,no
|
||||
@@ -25,14 +37,14 @@ T1053.007,Container Orchestration Job,Execution|Persistence|Privilege Escalation
|
||||
T1610,Deploy Container,Defense Evasion|Execution,TeamTNT
|
||||
T1609,Container Administration Command,Execution,TeamTNT
|
||||
T1608.005,Link Target,Resource Development,Silent Librarian
|
||||
T1608.004,Drive-by Target,Resource Development,Transparent Tribe|APT32|Threat Group-3390
|
||||
T1608.004,Drive-by Target,Resource Development,Dragonfly|Transparent Tribe|APT32|Threat Group-3390
|
||||
T1608.003,Install Digital Certificate,Resource Development,no
|
||||
T1608.002,Upload Tool,Resource Development,Threat Group-3390
|
||||
T1608.001,Upload Malware,Resource Development,TeamTNT|APT32
|
||||
T1608,Stage Capabilities,Resource Development,no
|
||||
T1016.001,Internet Connection Discovery,Discovery,APT29|Turla
|
||||
T1553.005,Mark-of-the-Web Bypass,Defense Evasion,TA505
|
||||
T1555.005,Password Managers,Credential Access,Fox Kitten|Operation Wocao
|
||||
T1608.002,Upload Tool,Resource Development,Lazarus Group|Threat Group-3390
|
||||
T1608.001,Upload Malware,Resource Development,Threat Group-3390|LazyScripter|Mustang Panda|Gamaredon Group|Kimsuky|Lazarus Group|TeamTNT|APT32
|
||||
T1608,Stage Capabilities,Resource Development,Mustang Panda
|
||||
T1016.001,Internet Connection Discovery,Discovery,Gamaredon Group|APT29|Turla
|
||||
T1553.005,Mark-of-the-Web Bypass,Defense Evasion,APT29|TA505
|
||||
T1555.005,Password Managers,Credential Access,Threat Group-3390|Fox Kitten|Operation Wocao
|
||||
T1484.002,Domain Trust Modification,Defense Evasion|Privilege Escalation,APT29
|
||||
T1484.001,Group Policy Modification,Defense Evasion|Privilege Escalation,Indrik Spider
|
||||
T1547.014,Active Setup,Persistence|Privilege Escalation,no
|
||||
@@ -61,8 +73,8 @@ T1588.006,Vulnerabilities,Resource Development,Sandworm Team
|
||||
T1053.006,Systemd Timers,Execution|Persistence|Privilege Escalation,no
|
||||
T1562.008,Disable Cloud Logs,Defense Evasion,no
|
||||
T1547.012,Print Processors,Persistence|Privilege Escalation,no
|
||||
T1598.003,Spearphishing Link,Reconnaissance,Magic Hound|Silent Librarian|Sidewinder|Sandworm Team|APT32|Kimsuky
|
||||
T1598.002,Spearphishing Attachment,Reconnaissance,Sidewinder
|
||||
T1598.003,Spearphishing Link,Reconnaissance,APT28|Dragonfly|Magic Hound|Silent Librarian|Sidewinder|Sandworm Team|APT32|Kimsuky
|
||||
T1598.002,Spearphishing Attachment,Reconnaissance,Dragonfly|Sidewinder
|
||||
T1598.001,Spearphishing Service,Reconnaissance,no
|
||||
T1598,Phishing for Information,Reconnaissance,ZIRCONIUM|APT28
|
||||
T1597.002,Purchase Technical Data,Reconnaissance,no
|
||||
@@ -74,23 +86,23 @@ T1596.003,Digital Certificates,Reconnaissance,no
|
||||
T1596.001,DNS/Passive DNS,Reconnaissance,no
|
||||
T1596.002,WHOIS,Reconnaissance,no
|
||||
T1596,Search Open Technical Databases,Reconnaissance,no
|
||||
T1595.002,Vulnerability Scanning,Reconnaissance,TeamTNT|APT29|Volatile Cedar|APT28|Sandworm Team
|
||||
T1595.002,Vulnerability Scanning,Reconnaissance,Magic Hound|Aquatic Panda|Dragonfly|TeamTNT|APT29|Volatile Cedar|APT28|Sandworm Team
|
||||
T1595.001,Scanning IP Blocks,Reconnaissance,TeamTNT
|
||||
T1595,Active Scanning,Reconnaissance,no
|
||||
T1594,Search Victim-Owned Websites,Reconnaissance,Silent Librarian|Sandworm Team
|
||||
T1593.002,Search Engines,Reconnaissance,no
|
||||
T1593.001,Social Media,Reconnaissance,Kimsuky
|
||||
T1594,Search Victim-Owned Websites,Reconnaissance,Kimsuky|Silent Librarian|Sandworm Team
|
||||
T1593.002,Search Engines,Reconnaissance,Kimsuky
|
||||
T1593.001,Social Media,Reconnaissance,Lazarus Group|Kimsuky
|
||||
T1593,Search Open Websites/Domains,Reconnaissance,Sandworm Team
|
||||
T1592.004,Client Configurations,Reconnaissance,HAFNIUM
|
||||
T1592.003,Firmware,Reconnaissance,no
|
||||
T1592.002,Software,Reconnaissance,Andariel|Sandworm Team
|
||||
T1592.001,Hardware,Reconnaissance,no
|
||||
T1592,Gather Victim Host Information,Reconnaissance,no
|
||||
T1591.004,Identify Roles,Reconnaissance,no
|
||||
T1591.004,Identify Roles,Reconnaissance,Lazarus Group
|
||||
T1591.003,Identify Business Tempo,Reconnaissance,no
|
||||
T1591.001,Determine Physical Locations,Reconnaissance,no
|
||||
T1591.002,Business Relationships,Reconnaissance,Sandworm Team
|
||||
T1591,Gather Victim Org Information,Reconnaissance,no
|
||||
T1591.002,Business Relationships,Reconnaissance,Dragonfly|Sandworm Team
|
||||
T1591,Gather Victim Org Information,Reconnaissance,Kimsuky|Lazarus Group
|
||||
T1590.006,Network Security Appliances,Reconnaissance,no
|
||||
T1590.005,IP Addresses,Reconnaissance,Andariel|HAFNIUM
|
||||
T1590.004,Network Topology,Reconnaissance,no
|
||||
@@ -98,40 +110,40 @@ T1590.003,Network Trust Dependencies,Reconnaissance,no
|
||||
T1590.002,DNS,Reconnaissance,no
|
||||
T1590.001,Domain Properties,Reconnaissance,Sandworm Team
|
||||
T1590,Gather Victim Network Information,Reconnaissance,HAFNIUM
|
||||
T1589.003,Employee Names,Reconnaissance,Silent Librarian|Sandworm Team
|
||||
T1589.002,Email Addresses,Reconnaissance,Kimsuky|Magic Hound|TA551|MuddyWater|HAFNIUM|APT32|Silent Librarian|Sandworm Team
|
||||
T1589.001,Credentials,Reconnaissance,Leviathan|APT28|Magic Hound|Chimera
|
||||
T1589.003,Employee Names,Reconnaissance,Kimsuky|Silent Librarian|Sandworm Team
|
||||
T1589.002,Email Addresses,Reconnaissance,Lazarus Group|Kimsuky|Magic Hound|TA551|MuddyWater|HAFNIUM|APT32|Silent Librarian|Sandworm Team
|
||||
T1589.001,Credentials,Reconnaissance,APT29|Leviathan|APT28|Magic Hound|Chimera
|
||||
T1589,Gather Victim Identity Information,Reconnaissance,Magic Hound|APT32
|
||||
T1588.005,Exploits,Resource Development,no
|
||||
T1588.004,Digital Certificates,Resource Development,Lazarus Group|Silent Librarian
|
||||
T1588.003,Code Signing Certificates,Resource Development,Wizard Spider
|
||||
T1588.002,Tool,Resource Development,CostaRicto|Night Dragon|DarkVishnya|FIN5|Gorgon Group|Patchwork|Chimera|Dragonfly|Blue Mockingbird|Whitefly|APT41|FIN6|TEMP.Veles|Kimsuky|PittyTiger|Cobalt Group|APT29|Thrip|Ke3chang|DarkHydrus|APT32|APT38|BRONZE BUTLER|Carbanak|Cleaver|Inception|Leafminer|Threat Group-3390|Ferocious Kitten|IndigoZebra|BackdoorDiplomacy|menuPass|APT-C-36|Magic Hound|APT28|Wizard Spider|Frankenstein|Silence|WIRTE|Turla|APT33|APT19|FIN10|CopyKittens|APT39|APT1|MuddyWater|Silent Librarian|GALLIUM|Sandworm Team
|
||||
T1588.001,Malware,Resource Development,Andariel|BackdoorDiplomacy|Turla|APT1
|
||||
T1588.005,Exploits,Resource Development,Kimsuky
|
||||
T1588.004,Digital Certificates,Resource Development,BlackTech|Lazarus Group|Silent Librarian
|
||||
T1588.003,Code Signing Certificates,Resource Development,BlackTech|Lazarus Group|Wizard Spider
|
||||
T1588.002,Tool,Resource Development,Aquatic Panda|BlackTech|Lazarus Group|CostaRicto|Night Dragon|DarkVishnya|FIN5|Gorgon Group|Patchwork|Chimera|Dragonfly|Blue Mockingbird|Whitefly|APT41|FIN6|TEMP.Veles|Kimsuky|PittyTiger|Cobalt Group|APT29|Thrip|Ke3chang|DarkHydrus|APT32|APT38|BRONZE BUTLER|Carbanak|Cleaver|Inception|Leafminer|Threat Group-3390|Ferocious Kitten|IndigoZebra|BackdoorDiplomacy|menuPass|APT-C-36|Magic Hound|APT28|Wizard Spider|Frankenstein|Silence|WIRTE|Turla|APT33|APT19|FIN10|CopyKittens|APT39|APT1|MuddyWater|Silent Librarian|GALLIUM|Sandworm Team
|
||||
T1588.001,Malware,Resource Development,Aquatic Panda|LazyScripter|Andariel|BackdoorDiplomacy|Turla|APT1
|
||||
T1588,Obtain Capabilities,Resource Development,no
|
||||
T1587.004,Exploits,Resource Development,no
|
||||
T1587.003,Digital Certificates,Resource Development,APT29|PROMETHIUM
|
||||
T1587.002,Code Signing Certificates,Resource Development,PROMETHIUM|Patchwork
|
||||
T1587.001,Malware,Resource Development,TeamTNT|APT29|Lazarus Group|Sandworm Team|Turla|FIN7|Night Dragon|Cleaver
|
||||
T1587.001,Malware,Resource Development,Ke3chang|Kimsuky|TeamTNT|APT29|Lazarus Group|Sandworm Team|Turla|FIN7|Night Dragon|Cleaver
|
||||
T1587,Develop Capabilities,Resource Development,Kimsuky
|
||||
T1586.002,Email Accounts,Resource Development,IndigoZebra|Leviathan|Magic Hound|Kimsuky
|
||||
T1586.002,Email Accounts,Resource Development,APT29|APT28|IndigoZebra|Leviathan|Magic Hound|Kimsuky
|
||||
T1586.001,Social Media Accounts,Resource Development,Leviathan
|
||||
T1586,Compromise Accounts,Resource Development,no
|
||||
T1585.002,Email Accounts,Resource Development,Leviathan|Magic Hound|Silent Librarian|Sandworm Team|APT1
|
||||
T1585.001,Social Media Accounts,Resource Development,Leviathan|Magic Hound|Fox Kitten|Sandworm Team|APT32|Cleaver
|
||||
T1585.002,Email Accounts,Resource Development,Mustang Panda|Kimsuky|Lazarus Group|Leviathan|Magic Hound|Silent Librarian|Sandworm Team|APT1
|
||||
T1585.001,Social Media Accounts,Resource Development,Kimsuky|Lazarus Group|Leviathan|Magic Hound|Fox Kitten|Sandworm Team|APT32|Cleaver
|
||||
T1585,Establish Accounts,Resource Development,Fox Kitten|APT17
|
||||
T1584.006,Web Services,Resource Development,Turla
|
||||
T1584.005,Botnet,Resource Development,no
|
||||
T1584.004,Server,Resource Development,Indrik Spider|Turla|APT16
|
||||
T1584.005,Botnet,Resource Development,Sandworm Team|Axiom
|
||||
T1584.004,Server,Resource Development,Lazarus Group|Dragonfly|Indrik Spider|Turla|APT16
|
||||
T1584.003,Virtual Private Server,Resource Development,Turla
|
||||
T1584.002,DNS Server,Resource Development,no
|
||||
T1584.001,Domains,Resource Development,Transparent Tribe|Magic Hound|APT29|APT1
|
||||
T1583.006,Web Services,Resource Development,IndigoZebra|ZIRCONIUM|MuddyWater|HAFNIUM|Lazarus Group|Turla|APT32|APT17|APT29
|
||||
T1584.001,Domains,Resource Development,Kimsuky|Lazarus Group|Transparent Tribe|Magic Hound|APT29|APT1
|
||||
T1583.006,Web Services,Resource Development,APT28|Confucius|LazyScripter|Kimsuky|Magic Hound|IndigoZebra|ZIRCONIUM|MuddyWater|HAFNIUM|Lazarus Group|Turla|APT32|APT17|APT29
|
||||
T1583.005,Botnet,Resource Development,no
|
||||
T1583.004,Server,Resource Development,GALLIUM|Sandworm Team
|
||||
T1583.003,Virtual Private Server,Resource Development,HAFNIUM|TEMP.Veles
|
||||
T1583.002,DNS Server,Resource Development,no
|
||||
T1583.004,Server,Resource Development,Kimsuky|Lazarus Group|Gelsemium|GALLIUM|Sandworm Team
|
||||
T1583.003,Virtual Private Server,Resource Development,Axiom|Dragonfly|HAFNIUM|TEMP.Veles
|
||||
T1583.002,DNS Server,Resource Development,Axiom
|
||||
T1584,Compromise Infrastructure,Resource Development,no
|
||||
T1583.001,Domains,Resource Development,IndigoZebra|TeamTNT|Ferocious Kitten|FIN7|Transparent Tribe|Leviathan|Magic Hound|APT29|Mustang Panda|ZIRCONIUM|Lazarus Group|Silent Librarian|menuPass|Sandworm Team|APT32|Kimsuky|APT1|APT28
|
||||
T1583.001,Domains,Resource Development,LazyScripter|Gamaredon Group|Winnti Group|Dragonfly|IndigoZebra|TeamTNT|Ferocious Kitten|FIN7|Transparent Tribe|Leviathan|Magic Hound|APT29|Mustang Panda|ZIRCONIUM|Lazarus Group|Silent Librarian|menuPass|Sandworm Team|APT32|Kimsuky|APT1|APT28
|
||||
T1583,Acquire Infrastructure,Resource Development,no
|
||||
T1564.007,VBA Stomping,Defense Evasion,no
|
||||
T1558.004,AS-REP Roasting,Credential Access,no
|
||||
@@ -145,7 +157,7 @@ T1574.012,COR_PROFILER,Persistence|Privilege Escalation|Defense Evasion,Blue Moc
|
||||
T1562.007,Disable or Modify Cloud Firewall,Defense Evasion,no
|
||||
T1098.004,SSH Authorized Keys,Persistence,TeamTNT
|
||||
T1480.001,Environmental Keying,Defense Evasion,APT41|Equation
|
||||
T1059.007,JavaScript,Execution,Indrik Spider|MuddyWater|Turla|Higaisa|Sidewinder|Evilnum|Kimsuky|FIN6|APT32|FIN7|Cobalt Group|Molerats|TA505|Silence|Leafminer
|
||||
T1059.007,JavaScript,Execution,LazyScripter|Indrik Spider|MuddyWater|Turla|Higaisa|Sidewinder|Evilnum|Kimsuky|FIN6|APT32|FIN7|Cobalt Group|Molerats|TA505|Silence|Leafminer
|
||||
T1578.004,Revert Cloud Instance,Defense Evasion,no
|
||||
T1578.003,Delete Cloud Instance,Defense Evasion,no
|
||||
T1578.001,Create Snapshot,Defense Evasion,no
|
||||
@@ -155,14 +167,14 @@ T1027.005,Indicator Removal from Tools,Defense Evasion,Operation Wocao|GALLIUM|T
|
||||
T1562.006,Indicator Blocking,Defense Evasion,no
|
||||
T1573.002,Asymmetric Cryptography,Command And Control,Operation Wocao|Tropic Trooper|Cobalt Group|OilRig|FIN8|FIN6
|
||||
T1573.001,Symmetric Cryptography,Command And Control,Mustang Panda|Darkhotel|ZIRCONIUM|Higaisa|Frankenstein|Inception|APT28|APT33|BRONZE BUTLER|Stealth Falcon|Lazarus Group
|
||||
T1573,Encrypted Channel,Command And Control,Tropic Trooper
|
||||
T1573,Encrypted Channel,Command And Control,APT29|Tropic Trooper
|
||||
T1027.004,Compile After Delivery,Defense Evasion,Gamaredon Group|Rocke|MuddyWater
|
||||
T1574.004,Dylib Hijacking,Persistence|Privilege Escalation|Defense Evasion,no
|
||||
T1546.015,Component Object Model Hijacking,Privilege Escalation|Persistence,APT28
|
||||
T1071.004,DNS,Command And Control,Chimera|APT39|Tropic Trooper|OilRig|Ke3chang|Cobalt Group|APT18|APT41|FIN7
|
||||
T1071.004,DNS,Command And Control,LazyScripter|Chimera|APT39|Tropic Trooper|OilRig|Ke3chang|Cobalt Group|APT18|APT41|FIN7
|
||||
T1071.003,Mail Protocols,Command And Control,Turla|Kimsuky|APT32|SilverTerrier|APT28
|
||||
T1071.002,File Transfer Protocols,Command And Control,Kimsuky|APT41|SilverTerrier|Honeybee
|
||||
T1071.001,Web Protocols,Command And Control,TeamTNT|FIN8|APT29|Mustang Panda|Windshift|TA551|Higaisa|HAFNIUM|Sidewinder|Chimera|Sandworm Team|TA505|Rocke|APT39|Tropic Trooper|MuddyWater|Wizard Spider|Inception|APT41|SilverTerrier|APT28|WIRTE|APT33|FIN4|Night Dragon|APT18|APT38|Rancor|Ke3chang|Orangeworm|APT37|APT19|Cobalt Group|Threat Group-3390|Dark Caracal|Turla|Lazarus Group|BRONZE BUTLER|Magic Hound|APT32|OilRig|Gamaredon Group|Stealth Falcon
|
||||
T1071.001,Web Protocols,Command And Control,Kimsuky|Confucius|TeamTNT|FIN8|APT29|Mustang Panda|Windshift|TA551|Higaisa|HAFNIUM|Sidewinder|Chimera|Sandworm Team|TA505|Rocke|APT39|Tropic Trooper|MuddyWater|Wizard Spider|Inception|APT41|SilverTerrier|APT28|WIRTE|APT33|FIN4|Night Dragon|APT18|APT38|Rancor|Ke3chang|Orangeworm|APT37|APT19|Cobalt Group|Threat Group-3390|Dark Caracal|Turla|Lazarus Group|BRONZE BUTLER|Magic Hound|APT32|OilRig|Gamaredon Group|Stealth Falcon
|
||||
T1572,Protocol Tunneling,Command And Control,Leviathan|CostaRicto|Chimera|Fox Kitten|OilRig|Cobalt Group|FIN6
|
||||
T1048.003,Exfiltration Over Unencrypted/Obfuscated Non-C2 Protocol,Exfiltration,Wizard Spider|FIN6|APT32|APT33|Thrip|FIN8|OilRig|Lazarus Group
|
||||
T1048.002,Exfiltration Over Asymmetric Encrypted Non-C2 Protocol,Exfiltration,APT28|APT29
|
||||
@@ -175,23 +187,23 @@ T1132.001,Standard Encoding,Command And Control,HAFNIUM|TA551|Sandworm Team|Trop
|
||||
T1090.004,Domain Fronting,Command And Control,APT29
|
||||
T1090.003,Multi-hop Proxy,Command And Control,Leviathan|CostaRicto|APT28|Operation Wocao|Inception|FIN4|APT29
|
||||
T1090.002,External Proxy,Command And Control,Tonto Team|APT39|Silence|GALLIUM|MuddyWater|APT3|FIN5|Lazarus Group|menuPass|APT28
|
||||
T1090.001,Internal Proxy,Command And Control,APT29|Higaisa|Operation Wocao|APT39|Strider
|
||||
T1090.001,Internal Proxy,Command And Control,Lazarus Group|Turla|APT29|Higaisa|Operation Wocao|APT39|Strider
|
||||
T1102.003,One-Way Communication,Command And Control,Leviathan
|
||||
T1102.002,Bidirectional Communication,Command And Control,ZIRCONIUM|MuddyWater|APT28|APT29|Sandworm Team|APT39|APT12|Turla|FIN7|APT37|Magic Hound|Carbanak
|
||||
T1102.002,Bidirectional Communication,Command And Control,Kimsuky|Lazarus Group|ZIRCONIUM|MuddyWater|APT28|APT29|Sandworm Team|APT39|APT12|Turla|FIN7|APT37|Magic Hound|Carbanak
|
||||
T1102.001,Dead Drop Resolver,Command And Control,Rocke|APT41|BRONZE BUTLER|RTM|Patchwork
|
||||
T1571,Non-Standard Port,Command And Control,Sandworm Team|Rocke|DarkVishnya|Silence|APT-C-36|Magic Hound|APT33|APT32|TEMP.Veles|Lazarus Group|FIN7
|
||||
T1571,Non-Standard Port,Command And Control,WIRTE|Sandworm Team|Rocke|DarkVishnya|Silence|APT-C-36|Magic Hound|APT33|APT32|TEMP.Veles|Lazarus Group|FIN7
|
||||
T1074.002,Remote Data Staging,Collection,Leviathan|APT28|APT29|Chimera|Threat Group-3390|menuPass|FIN6|Night Dragon|FIN8
|
||||
T1074.001,Local Data Staging,Collection,Indrik Spider|BackdoorDiplomacy|Mustang Panda|Sidewinder|Chimera|Kimsuky|APT39|Operation Wocao|GALLIUM|TEMP.Veles|Patchwork|Honeybee|Dragonfly 2.0|Leviathan|APT3|FIN5|menuPass|Lazarus Group|Threat Group-3390|APT28
|
||||
T1078.004,Cloud Accounts,Defense Evasion|Persistence|Privilege Escalation|Initial Access,APT28|APT33
|
||||
T1074.001,Local Data Staging,Collection,Dragonfly|Indrik Spider|BackdoorDiplomacy|Mustang Panda|Sidewinder|Chimera|Kimsuky|APT39|Operation Wocao|GALLIUM|TEMP.Veles|Patchwork|Honeybee|Dragonfly 2.0|Leviathan|APT3|FIN5|menuPass|Lazarus Group|Threat Group-3390|APT28
|
||||
T1078.004,Cloud Accounts,Defense Evasion|Persistence|Privilege Escalation|Initial Access,Ke3chang|APT29|APT28|APT33
|
||||
T1564.004,NTFS File Attributes,Defense Evasion,APT32
|
||||
T1564.003,Hidden Window,Defense Evasion,Nomadic Octopus|Higaisa|Gorgon Group|Deep Panda|DarkHydrus|CopyKittens|APT19|APT32|APT28|APT3|Magic Hound
|
||||
T1078.003,Local Accounts,Defense Evasion|Persistence|Privilege Escalation|Initial Access,Kimsuky|HAFNIUM|Turla|Operation Wocao|PROMETHIUM|Tropic Trooper|FIN10|APT32
|
||||
T1564.003,Hidden Window,Defense Evasion,Gamaredon Group|Kimsuky|Nomadic Octopus|Higaisa|Gorgon Group|Deep Panda|DarkHydrus|CopyKittens|APT19|APT32|APT28|APT3|Magic Hound
|
||||
T1078.003,Local Accounts,Defense Evasion|Persistence|Privilege Escalation|Initial Access,APT29|Kimsuky|HAFNIUM|Turla|Operation Wocao|PROMETHIUM|Tropic Trooper|FIN10|APT32
|
||||
T1078.002,Domain Accounts,Defense Evasion|Persistence|Privilege Escalation|Initial Access,Naikon|Indrik Spider|Chimera|Operation Wocao|Sandworm Team|Wizard Spider|APT29|TA505|APT3|Threat Group-1314
|
||||
T1078.001,Default Accounts,Defense Evasion|Persistence|Privilege Escalation|Initial Access,no
|
||||
T1564.002,Hidden Users,Defense Evasion,Dragonfly 2.0
|
||||
T1564.002,Hidden Users,Defense Evasion,Kimsuky|Dragonfly|Dragonfly 2.0
|
||||
T1574.006,Dynamic Linker Hijacking,Persistence|Privilege Escalation|Defense Evasion,APT41|Rocke
|
||||
T1574.002,DLL Side-Loading,Persistence|Privilege Escalation|Defense Evasion,Mustang Panda|Higaisa|BlackTech|Sidewinder|Chimera|BRONZE BUTLER|Naikon|APT41|GALLIUM|Tropic Trooper|APT19|Patchwork|APT32|APT3|menuPass|Threat Group-3390
|
||||
T1574.001,DLL Search Order Hijacking,Persistence|Privilege Escalation|Defense Evasion,BackdoorDiplomacy|Tonto Team|Evilnum|APT41|Whitefly|RTM|Threat Group-3390|menuPass
|
||||
T1574.002,DLL Side-Loading,Persistence|Privilege Escalation|Defense Evasion,Lazarus Group|Mustang Panda|Higaisa|BlackTech|Sidewinder|Chimera|BRONZE BUTLER|Naikon|APT41|GALLIUM|Tropic Trooper|APT19|Patchwork|APT32|APT3|menuPass|Threat Group-3390
|
||||
T1574.001,DLL Search Order Hijacking,Persistence|Privilege Escalation|Defense Evasion,Aquatic Panda|BackdoorDiplomacy|Tonto Team|Evilnum|APT41|Whitefly|RTM|Threat Group-3390|menuPass
|
||||
T1574.008,Path Interception by Search Order Hijacking,Persistence|Privilege Escalation|Defense Evasion,no
|
||||
T1574.007,Path Interception by PATH Environment Variable,Persistence|Privilege Escalation|Defense Evasion,no
|
||||
T1574.009,Path Interception by Unquoted Path,Persistence|Privilege Escalation|Defense Evasion,no
|
||||
@@ -202,10 +214,10 @@ T1574,Hijack Execution Flow,Persistence|Privilege Escalation|Defense Evasion,no
|
||||
T1069.001,Local Groups,Discovery,Tonto Team|Chimera|Operation Wocao|Turla|OilRig|admin@338
|
||||
T1570,Lateral Tool Transfer,Lateral Movement,Sandworm Team|Chimera|GALLIUM|Operation Wocao|APT32|Wizard Spider|Turla|FIN10
|
||||
T1568.003,DNS Calculation,Command And Control,APT12
|
||||
T1204.002,Malicious File,Execution,Nomadic Octopus|Indrik Spider|APT38|Andariel|Ferocious Kitten|IndigoZebra|Transparent Tribe|Tonto Team|Magic Hound|Ajax Security Team|Mustang Panda|TA551|Higaisa|Sidewinder|Kimsuky|FIN6|PROMETHIUM|APT30|Windshift|APT33|Sandworm Team|Naikon|Whitefly|Tropic Trooper|Gamaredon Group|Sharpshooter|Molerats|Wizard Spider|Mofang|Frankenstein|RTM|Inception|BlackTech|APT-C-36|Machete|admin@338|APT12|TA505|Silence|The White Company|APT39|FIN4|Darkhotel|Gallmaker|Dragonfly 2.0|FIN7|BRONZE BUTLER|Gorgon Group|OilRig|Dark Caracal|Cobalt Group|DarkHydrus|Rancor|Patchwork|APT32|APT19|MuddyWater|Lazarus Group|menuPass|APT37|Leviathan|TA459|APT29|APT28|FIN8|PLATINUM|Elderwood
|
||||
T1204.001,Malicious Link,Execution,FIN7|Transparent Tribe|APT3|Magic Hound|APT28|APT29|Mustang Panda|Sidewinder|ZIRCONIUM|MuddyWater|Evilnum|Sandworm Team|Wizard Spider|Patchwork|Windshift|APT32|Molerats|Mofang|BlackTech|TA505|OilRig|Machete|Leviathan|FIN8|FIN4|Elderwood|Dragonfly 2.0|Cobalt Group|APT39|Night Dragon|Turla|APT33
|
||||
T1204.002,Malicious File,Execution,LazyScripter|WIRTE|Confucius|Dragonfly|Threat Group-3390|Nomadic Octopus|Indrik Spider|APT38|Andariel|Ferocious Kitten|IndigoZebra|Transparent Tribe|Tonto Team|Magic Hound|Ajax Security Team|Mustang Panda|TA551|Higaisa|Sidewinder|Kimsuky|FIN6|PROMETHIUM|APT30|Windshift|APT33|Sandworm Team|Naikon|Whitefly|Tropic Trooper|Gamaredon Group|Sharpshooter|Molerats|Wizard Spider|Mofang|Frankenstein|RTM|Inception|BlackTech|APT-C-36|Machete|admin@338|APT12|TA505|Silence|The White Company|APT39|FIN4|Darkhotel|Gallmaker|Dragonfly 2.0|FIN7|BRONZE BUTLER|Gorgon Group|OilRig|Dark Caracal|Cobalt Group|DarkHydrus|Rancor|Patchwork|APT32|APT19|MuddyWater|Lazarus Group|menuPass|APT37|Leviathan|TA459|APT29|APT28|FIN8|PLATINUM|Elderwood
|
||||
T1204.001,Malicious Link,Execution,LazyScripter|Kimsuky|Lazarus Group|Confucius|FIN7|Transparent Tribe|APT3|Magic Hound|APT28|APT29|Mustang Panda|Sidewinder|ZIRCONIUM|MuddyWater|Evilnum|Sandworm Team|Wizard Spider|Patchwork|Windshift|APT32|Molerats|Mofang|BlackTech|TA505|OilRig|Machete|Leviathan|FIN8|FIN4|Elderwood|Dragonfly 2.0|Cobalt Group|APT39|Night Dragon|Turla|APT33
|
||||
T1195.003,Compromise Hardware Supply Chain,Initial Access,no
|
||||
T1195.002,Compromise Software Supply Chain,Initial Access,APT29|Cobalt Group|GOLD SOUTHFIELD|Dragonfly|Sandworm Team|APT41
|
||||
T1195.002,Compromise Software Supply Chain,Initial Access,Gelsemium|Threat Group-3390|APT29|Cobalt Group|GOLD SOUTHFIELD|Dragonfly|Sandworm Team|APT41
|
||||
T1195.001,Compromise Software Dependencies and Development Tools,Initial Access,no
|
||||
T1568.001,Fast Flux DNS,Command And Control,menuPass|TA505
|
||||
T1052.001,Exfiltration over USB,Exfiltration,Mustang Panda|Tropic Trooper
|
||||
@@ -213,65 +225,65 @@ T1569.002,Service Execution,Execution,APT38|Chimera|Operation Wocao|Wizard Spide
|
||||
T1569.001,Launchctl,Execution,no
|
||||
T1569,System Services,Execution,no
|
||||
T1568.002,Domain Generation Algorithms,Command And Control,TA551|APT41
|
||||
T1568,Dynamic Resolution,Command And Control,Transparent Tribe|APT29
|
||||
T1568,Dynamic Resolution,Command And Control,Gamaredon Group|Gelsemium|Transparent Tribe|APT29
|
||||
T1011.001,Exfiltration Over Bluetooth,Exfiltration,no
|
||||
T1567.002,Exfiltration to Cloud Storage,Exfiltration,FIN7|ZIRCONIUM|HAFNIUM|Chimera|Leviathan|Turla
|
||||
T1567.002,Exfiltration to Cloud Storage,Exfiltration,Kimsuky|Threat Group-3390|Confucius|Lazarus Group|FIN7|ZIRCONIUM|HAFNIUM|Chimera|Leviathan|Turla
|
||||
T1567.001,Exfiltration to Code Repository,Exfiltration,no
|
||||
T1059.006,Python,Execution,Tonto Team|APT37|ZIRCONIUM|MuddyWater|Turla|Operation Wocao|Kimsuky|APT29|Rocke|BRONZE BUTLER|APT39|Dragonfly 2.0|Machete
|
||||
T1059.005,Visual Basic,Execution,OilRig|APT38|Transparent Tribe|APT29|Mustang Panda|Windshift|Higaisa|Sidewinder|APT39|Machete|Operation Wocao|Kimsuky|APT33|Sandworm Team|Gamaredon Group|Sharpshooter|Molerats|Frankenstein|Inception|APT-C-36|Rancor|Patchwork|MuddyWater|Honeybee|FIN7|APT37|BRONZE BUTLER|APT32|Turla|TA505|Silence|WIRTE|FIN4|Cobalt Group|Gorgon Group|Leviathan|TA459|Magic Hound
|
||||
T1059.006,Python,Execution,Dragonfly|Tonto Team|APT37|ZIRCONIUM|MuddyWater|Turla|Operation Wocao|Kimsuky|APT29|Rocke|BRONZE BUTLER|APT39|Dragonfly 2.0|Machete
|
||||
T1059.005,Visual Basic,Execution,Confucius|Lazarus Group|LazyScripter|OilRig|APT38|Transparent Tribe|APT29|Mustang Panda|Windshift|Higaisa|Sidewinder|APT39|Machete|Operation Wocao|Kimsuky|APT33|Sandworm Team|Gamaredon Group|Sharpshooter|Molerats|Frankenstein|Inception|APT-C-36|Rancor|Patchwork|MuddyWater|Honeybee|FIN7|APT37|BRONZE BUTLER|APT32|Turla|TA505|Silence|WIRTE|FIN4|Cobalt Group|Gorgon Group|Leviathan|TA459|Magic Hound
|
||||
T1059.004,Unix Shell,Execution,TeamTNT|Rocke|APT41
|
||||
T1059.003,Windows Command Shell,Execution,Sandworm Team|Nomadic Octopus|TeamTNT|APT29|Mustang Panda|ZIRCONIUM|TA551|Higaisa|Indrik Spider|Chimera|Fox Kitten|Machete|Operation Wocao|Wizard Spider|FIN6|TA505|Blue Mockingbird|Tropic Trooper|Frankenstein|OilRig|Lazarus Group|Honeybee|Cobalt Group|FIN7|APT41|GALLIUM|Turla|Silence|APT32|Darkhotel|MuddyWater|APT18|APT38|Gorgon Group|Dark Caracal|Ke3chang|Dragonfly 2.0|Rancor|FIN8|APT28|APT37|Magic Hound|BRONZE BUTLER|Sowbug|menuPass|FIN10|Threat Group-3390|Gamaredon Group|Patchwork|Suckfly|Threat Group-1314|APT3|admin@338|APT1
|
||||
T1059.003,Windows Command Shell,Execution,Kimsuky|Aquatic Panda|Dragonfly|LazyScripter|Sandworm Team|Nomadic Octopus|TeamTNT|APT29|Mustang Panda|ZIRCONIUM|TA551|Higaisa|Indrik Spider|Chimera|Fox Kitten|Machete|Operation Wocao|Wizard Spider|FIN6|TA505|Blue Mockingbird|Tropic Trooper|Frankenstein|OilRig|Lazarus Group|Honeybee|Cobalt Group|FIN7|APT41|GALLIUM|Turla|Silence|APT32|Darkhotel|MuddyWater|APT18|APT38|Gorgon Group|Dark Caracal|Ke3chang|Dragonfly 2.0|Rancor|FIN8|APT28|APT37|Magic Hound|BRONZE BUTLER|Sowbug|menuPass|FIN10|Threat Group-3390|Gamaredon Group|Patchwork|Suckfly|Threat Group-1314|APT3|admin@338|APT1
|
||||
T1059.002,AppleScript,Execution,no
|
||||
T1059.001,PowerShell,Execution,Nomadic Octopus|TeamTNT|APT38|Tonto Team|Mustang Panda|Indrik Spider|HAFNIUM|Sidewinder|Fox Kitten|GOLD SOUTHFIELD|Sandworm Team|Operation Wocao|Chimera|Blue Mockingbird|APT39|DarkVishnya|Molerats|Wizard Spider|Frankenstein|Inception|Silence|APT41|Kimsuky|GALLIUM|TA505|WIRTE|TEMP.Veles|APT33|Gallmaker|Turla|Thrip|Cobalt Group|APT28|DarkHydrus|Dragonfly 2.0|APT19|Gorgon Group|TA459|Leviathan|MuddyWater|FIN8|CopyKittens|OilRig|Magic Hound|BRONZE BUTLER|FIN7|APT32|menuPass|FIN10|Threat Group-3390|Patchwork|Stealth Falcon|FIN6|Poseidon Group|APT3|APT29|Deep Panda
|
||||
T1059.001,PowerShell,Execution,Gamaredon Group|Lazarus Group|Aquatic Panda|Confucius|Dragonfly|LazyScripter|Nomadic Octopus|TeamTNT|APT38|Tonto Team|Mustang Panda|Indrik Spider|HAFNIUM|Sidewinder|Fox Kitten|GOLD SOUTHFIELD|Sandworm Team|Operation Wocao|Chimera|Blue Mockingbird|APT39|DarkVishnya|Molerats|Wizard Spider|Frankenstein|Inception|Silence|APT41|Kimsuky|GALLIUM|TA505|WIRTE|TEMP.Veles|APT33|Gallmaker|Turla|Thrip|Cobalt Group|APT28|DarkHydrus|Dragonfly 2.0|APT19|Gorgon Group|TA459|Leviathan|MuddyWater|FIN8|CopyKittens|OilRig|Magic Hound|BRONZE BUTLER|FIN7|APT32|menuPass|FIN10|Threat Group-3390|Patchwork|Stealth Falcon|FIN6|Poseidon Group|APT3|APT29|Deep Panda
|
||||
T1567,Exfiltration Over Web Service,Exfiltration,APT28
|
||||
T1497.003,Time Based Evasion,Defense Evasion|Discovery,no
|
||||
T1497.002,User Activity Based Checks,Defense Evasion|Discovery,Darkhotel|FIN7
|
||||
T1497.001,System Checks,Defense Evasion|Discovery,OilRig|Darkhotel|Evilnum|Frankenstein
|
||||
T1497.001,System Checks,Defense Evasion|Discovery,Lazarus Group|OilRig|Darkhotel|Evilnum|Frankenstein
|
||||
T1498.002,Reflection Amplification,Impact,no
|
||||
T1498.001,Direct Network Flood,Impact,no
|
||||
T1566.003,Spearphishing via Service,Initial Access,APT29|Ajax Security Team|Magic Hound|Windshift|FIN6|OilRig|Dark Caracal
|
||||
T1566.002,Spearphishing Link,Initial Access,Transparent Tribe|FIN7|APT3|Mustang Panda|ZIRCONIUM|MuddyWater|Sidewinder|Evilnum|Sandworm Team|Wizard Spider|APT1|Windshift|Molerats|Mofang|BlackTech|Machete|Kimsuky|TA505|APT39|FIN4|APT32|Night Dragon|APT28|Cobalt Group|Turla|Dragonfly 2.0|OilRig|Elderwood|APT33|APT29|Leviathan|FIN8|Patchwork|Magic Hound
|
||||
T1566.001,Spearphishing Attachment,Initial Access,APT38|Andariel|Ferocious Kitten|IndigoZebra|Transparent Tribe|Nomadic Octopus|Tonto Team|Ajax Security Team|Mustang Panda|TA551|Higaisa|Sidewinder|APT1|FIN6|APT30|Windshift|APT33|Sandworm Team|Naikon|Gamaredon Group|Sharpshooter|Molerats|Mofang|Wizard Spider|RTM|Frankenstein|Inception|BlackTech|APT-C-36|APT41|Machete|admin@338|Kimsuky|APT12|TA505|Silence|The White Company|APT39|FIN4|Darkhotel|Gallmaker|Tropic Trooper|DarkHydrus|Lazarus Group|Gorgon Group|OilRig|BRONZE BUTLER|APT19|APT32|Cobalt Group|Rancor|FIN7|Dragonfly 2.0|MuddyWater|APT28|TA459|APT29|APT37|Leviathan|FIN8|Patchwork|menuPass|Elderwood|PLATINUM
|
||||
T1566,Phishing,Initial Access,GOLD SOUTHFIELD|Dragonfly
|
||||
T1566.003,Spearphishing via Service,Initial Access,Lazarus Group|APT29|Ajax Security Team|Magic Hound|Windshift|FIN6|OilRig|Dark Caracal
|
||||
T1566.002,Spearphishing Link,Initial Access,Lazarus Group|Confucius|LazyScripter|Transparent Tribe|FIN7|APT3|Mustang Panda|ZIRCONIUM|MuddyWater|Sidewinder|Evilnum|Sandworm Team|Wizard Spider|APT1|Windshift|Molerats|Mofang|BlackTech|Machete|Kimsuky|TA505|APT39|FIN4|APT32|Night Dragon|APT28|Cobalt Group|Turla|Dragonfly 2.0|OilRig|Elderwood|APT33|APT29|Leviathan|FIN8|Patchwork|Magic Hound
|
||||
T1566.001,Spearphishing Attachment,Initial Access,WIRTE|Confucius|Dragonfly|LazyScripter|Threat Group-3390|APT38|Andariel|Ferocious Kitten|IndigoZebra|Transparent Tribe|Nomadic Octopus|Tonto Team|Ajax Security Team|Mustang Panda|TA551|Higaisa|Sidewinder|APT1|FIN6|APT30|Windshift|APT33|Sandworm Team|Naikon|Gamaredon Group|Sharpshooter|Molerats|Mofang|Wizard Spider|RTM|Frankenstein|Inception|BlackTech|APT-C-36|APT41|Machete|admin@338|Kimsuky|APT12|TA505|Silence|The White Company|APT39|FIN4|Darkhotel|Gallmaker|Tropic Trooper|DarkHydrus|Lazarus Group|Gorgon Group|OilRig|BRONZE BUTLER|APT19|APT32|Cobalt Group|Rancor|FIN7|Dragonfly 2.0|MuddyWater|APT28|TA459|APT29|APT37|Leviathan|FIN8|Patchwork|menuPass|Elderwood|PLATINUM
|
||||
T1566,Phishing,Initial Access,Axiom|GOLD SOUTHFIELD|Dragonfly
|
||||
T1565.003,Runtime Data Manipulation,Impact,APT38
|
||||
T1565.002,Transmitted Data Manipulation,Impact,APT38
|
||||
T1565.001,Stored Data Manipulation,Impact,APT38
|
||||
T1565,Data Manipulation,Impact,no
|
||||
T1564.001,Hidden Files and Directories,Defense Evasion,Transparent Tribe|Mustang Panda|Rocke|APT32|Tropic Trooper|APT28|Lazarus Group
|
||||
T1564,Hide Artifacts,Defense Evasion,no
|
||||
T1563.002,RDP Hijacking,Lateral Movement,no
|
||||
T1563.002,RDP Hijacking,Lateral Movement,Axiom
|
||||
T1563.001,SSH Hijacking,Lateral Movement,no
|
||||
T1563,Remote Service Session Hijacking,Lateral Movement,no
|
||||
T1518.001,Security Software Discovery,Discovery,TeamTNT|APT38|Windshift|Sidewinder|Operation Wocao|Wizard Spider|Turla|Rocke|Frankenstein|The White Company|Cobalt Group|Darkhotel|MuddyWater|Tropic Trooper|FIN8|Patchwork|Naikon
|
||||
T1518.001,Security Software Discovery,Discovery,Kimsuky|Aquatic Panda|TeamTNT|APT38|Windshift|Sidewinder|Operation Wocao|Wizard Spider|Turla|Rocke|Frankenstein|The White Company|Cobalt Group|Darkhotel|MuddyWater|Tropic Trooper|FIN8|Patchwork|Naikon
|
||||
T1069.003,Cloud Groups,Discovery,no
|
||||
T1069.002,Domain Groups,Discovery,Turla|Inception|OilRig|Dragonfly 2.0|Ke3chang
|
||||
T1087.004,Cloud Account,Discovery,no
|
||||
T1069.002,Domain Groups,Discovery,APT29|Dragonfly|Turla|Inception|OilRig|Dragonfly 2.0|Ke3chang
|
||||
T1087.004,Cloud Account,Discovery,APT29
|
||||
T1087.003,Email Account,Discovery,Sandworm Team|TA505
|
||||
T1087.002,Domain Account,Discovery,MuddyWater|Fox Kitten|Operation Wocao|Wizard Spider|Chimera|Turla|Sandworm Team|Dragonfly 2.0|OilRig|BRONZE BUTLER|menuPass|FIN6|Poseidon Group|Ke3chang
|
||||
T1087.002,Domain Account,Discovery,APT29|Lazarus Group|Dragonfly|MuddyWater|Fox Kitten|Operation Wocao|Wizard Spider|Chimera|Turla|Sandworm Team|Dragonfly 2.0|OilRig|BRONZE BUTLER|menuPass|FIN6|Poseidon Group|Ke3chang
|
||||
T1087.001,Local Account,Discovery,Chimera|Fox Kitten|Turla|Poseidon Group|OilRig|Ke3chang|APT32|APT1|Threat Group-3390|APT3|admin@338
|
||||
T1553.004,Install Root Certificate,Defense Evasion,no
|
||||
T1562.004,Disable or Modify System Firewall,Defense Evasion,TeamTNT|APT38|APT29|Operation Wocao|Rocke|Lazarus Group|Kimsuky|Dragonfly 2.0|Carbanak
|
||||
T1562.004,Disable or Modify System Firewall,Defense Evasion,Dragonfly|TeamTNT|APT38|APT29|Operation Wocao|Rocke|Lazarus Group|Kimsuky|Dragonfly 2.0|Carbanak
|
||||
T1562.003,Impair Command History Logging,Defense Evasion,APT38
|
||||
T1562.002,Disable Windows Event Logging,Defense Evasion,Sandworm Team|APT29|Threat Group-3390
|
||||
T1562.001,Disable or Modify Tools,Defense Evasion,TeamTNT|Indrik Spider|APT29|MuddyWater|Wizard Spider|FIN6|Gamaredon Group|BRONZE BUTLER|Rocke|Kimsuky|Turla|Night Dragon|Gorgon Group|Lazarus Group|Putter Panda
|
||||
T1562.001,Disable or Modify Tools,Defense Evasion,Aquatic Panda|TeamTNT|Indrik Spider|APT29|MuddyWater|Wizard Spider|FIN6|Gamaredon Group|BRONZE BUTLER|Rocke|Kimsuky|Turla|Night Dragon|Gorgon Group|Lazarus Group|Putter Panda
|
||||
T1562,Impair Defenses,Defense Evasion,no
|
||||
T1003.004,LSA Secrets,Credential Access,OilRig|MuddyWater|menuPass|Leafminer|Ke3chang|Dragonfly 2.0|APT33|Threat Group-3390
|
||||
T1003.004,LSA Secrets,Credential Access,Dragonfly|OilRig|MuddyWater|menuPass|Leafminer|Ke3chang|Dragonfly 2.0|APT33|Threat Group-3390
|
||||
T1003.005,Cached Domain Credentials,Credential Access,OilRig|MuddyWater|Leafminer|APT33
|
||||
T1561.002,Disk Structure Wipe,Impact,Sandworm Team|Lazarus Group|APT38|APT37
|
||||
T1561.001,Disk Content Wipe,Impact,Lazarus Group
|
||||
T1561,Disk Wipe,Impact,no
|
||||
T1560.003,Archive via Custom Method,Collection,Mustang Panda|Lazarus Group|Kimsuky|CopyKittens|FIN6
|
||||
T1560.002,Archive via Library,Collection,Lazarus Group|Threat Group-3390
|
||||
T1560.001,Archive via Utility,Collection,APT28|APT29|Mustang Panda|HAFNIUM|Fox Kitten|Operation Wocao|Chimera|APT41|GALLIUM|Turla|Gallmaker|APT33|APT39|MuddyWater|Magic Hound|FIN8|BRONZE BUTLER|CopyKittens|Sowbug|APT3|menuPass|APT1|Ke3chang
|
||||
T1560,Archive Collected Data,Collection,Leviathan|menuPass|APT32|Honeybee|Patchwork|APT28|Dragonfly 2.0|FIN6|Lazarus Group|Ke3chang
|
||||
T1560.001,Archive via Utility,Collection,Kimsuky|Aquatic Panda|APT28|APT29|Mustang Panda|HAFNIUM|Fox Kitten|Operation Wocao|Chimera|APT41|GALLIUM|Turla|Gallmaker|APT33|APT39|MuddyWater|Magic Hound|FIN8|BRONZE BUTLER|CopyKittens|Sowbug|APT3|menuPass|APT1|Ke3chang
|
||||
T1560,Archive Collected Data,Collection,Axiom|Dragonfly|Leviathan|menuPass|APT32|Honeybee|Patchwork|APT28|Dragonfly 2.0|FIN6|Lazarus Group|Ke3chang
|
||||
T1499.004,Application or System Exploitation,Impact,no
|
||||
T1499.003,Application Exhaustion Flood,Impact,no
|
||||
T1499.002,Service Exhaustion Flood,Impact,no
|
||||
T1499.001,OS Exhaustion Flood,Impact,no
|
||||
T1491.002,External Defacement,Impact,Sandworm Team
|
||||
T1491.001,Internal Defacement,Impact,Lazarus Group
|
||||
T1491.001,Internal Defacement,Impact,Gamaredon Group|Lazarus Group
|
||||
T1114.003,Email Forwarding Rule,Collection,Silent Librarian|Kimsuky
|
||||
T1114.002,Remote Email Collection,Collection,APT29|HAFNIUM|Chimera|APT1|FIN4|Ke3chang|Leafminer|Dragonfly 2.0|APT28
|
||||
T1114.002,Remote Email Collection,Collection,Kimsuky|Dragonfly|APT29|HAFNIUM|Chimera|APT1|FIN4|Ke3chang|Leafminer|Dragonfly 2.0|APT28
|
||||
T1114.001,Local Email Collection,Collection,Chimera|Magic Hound|APT1
|
||||
T1134.005,SID-History Injection,Defense Evasion|Privilege Escalation,no
|
||||
T1134.004,Parent PID Spoofing,Defense Evasion|Privilege Escalation,no
|
||||
@@ -280,7 +292,7 @@ T1134.002,Create Process with Token,Defense Evasion|Privilege Escalation,Turla|L
|
||||
T1134.001,Token Impersonation/Theft,Defense Evasion|Privilege Escalation,FIN8|APT28
|
||||
T1213.002,Sharepoint,Collection,Chimera|Ke3chang|APT28
|
||||
T1213.001,Confluence,Collection,no
|
||||
T1555.003,Credentials from Web Browsers,Credential Access,Ajax Security Team|ZIRCONIUM|FIN6|Sandworm Team|Inception|Stealth Falcon|OilRig|Leafminer|APT33|APT3|Kimsuky|TA505|MuddyWater|APT37|Patchwork|Molerats
|
||||
T1555.003,Credentials from Web Browsers,Credential Access,APT29|Ajax Security Team|ZIRCONIUM|FIN6|Sandworm Team|Inception|Stealth Falcon|OilRig|Leafminer|APT33|APT3|Kimsuky|TA505|MuddyWater|APT37|Patchwork|Molerats
|
||||
T1555.002,Securityd Memory,Credential Access,no
|
||||
T1555.001,Keychain,Credential Access,no
|
||||
T1559.002,Dynamic Data Exchange,Execution,Leviathan|Sidewinder|Sharpshooter|TA505|MuddyWater|Gallmaker|Patchwork|Cobalt Group|APT37|FIN7|APT28
|
||||
@@ -289,7 +301,7 @@ T1559,Inter-Process Communication,Execution,no
|
||||
T1558.002,Silver Ticket,Credential Access,no
|
||||
T1558.001,Golden Ticket,Credential Access,Ke3chang
|
||||
T1558,Steal or Forge Kerberos Tickets,Credential Access,no
|
||||
T1557.001,LLMNR/NBT-NS Poisoning and SMB Relay,Credential Access|Collection,Wizard Spider
|
||||
T1557.001,LLMNR/NBT-NS Poisoning and SMB Relay,Credential Access|Collection,Lazarus Group|Wizard Spider
|
||||
T1557,Adversary-in-the-Middle,Credential Access|Collection,Kimsuky
|
||||
T1556.002,Password Filter DLL,Credential Access|Defense Evasion|Persistence,Strider
|
||||
T1556.001,Domain Controller Authentication,Credential Access|Defense Evasion|Persistence,Chimera
|
||||
@@ -305,32 +317,32 @@ T1003.007,Proc Filesystem,Credential Access,no
|
||||
T1003.006,DCSync,Credential Access,APT29|Operation Wocao
|
||||
T1558.003,Kerberoasting,Credential Access,FIN7|APT29|Operation Wocao|Wizard Spider
|
||||
T1552.006,Group Policy Preferences,Credential Access,APT33
|
||||
T1003.003,NTDS,Credential Access,APT28|Mustang Panda|HAFNIUM|Fox Kitten|menuPass|Wizard Spider|Chimera|FIN6|Dragonfly 2.0
|
||||
T1003.002,Security Account Manager,Credential Access,Wizard Spider|Threat Group-3390|Ke3chang|GALLIUM|Night Dragon|Dragonfly 2.0|menuPass
|
||||
T1003.001,LSASS Memory,Credential Access,Indrik Spider|HAFNIUM|Fox Kitten|Operation Wocao|Kimsuky|Sandworm Team|Whitefly|Blue Mockingbird|Silence|Threat Group-3390|Leviathan|APT41|GALLIUM|TEMP.Veles|APT33|APT39|APT32|Leafminer|Magic Hound|FIN8|PLATINUM|MuddyWater|OilRig|BRONZE BUTLER|FIN6|APT3|APT28|APT1|Ke3chang|Cleaver
|
||||
T1003.003,NTDS,Credential Access,Ke3chang|Dragonfly|APT28|Mustang Panda|HAFNIUM|Fox Kitten|menuPass|Wizard Spider|Chimera|FIN6|Dragonfly 2.0
|
||||
T1003.002,Security Account Manager,Credential Access,Dragonfly|Wizard Spider|Threat Group-3390|Ke3chang|GALLIUM|Night Dragon|Dragonfly 2.0|menuPass
|
||||
T1003.001,LSASS Memory,Credential Access,Aquatic Panda|Indrik Spider|HAFNIUM|Fox Kitten|Operation Wocao|Kimsuky|Sandworm Team|Whitefly|Blue Mockingbird|Silence|Threat Group-3390|Leviathan|APT41|GALLIUM|TEMP.Veles|APT33|APT39|APT32|Leafminer|Magic Hound|FIN8|PLATINUM|MuddyWater|OilRig|BRONZE BUTLER|FIN6|APT3|APT28|APT1|Ke3chang|Cleaver
|
||||
T1110.004,Credential Stuffing,Credential Access,Chimera
|
||||
T1110.003,Password Spraying,Credential Access,Sandworm Team|APT29|Silent Librarian|Chimera|APT28|APT33|Leafminer|Lazarus Group
|
||||
T1110.002,Password Cracking,Credential Access,FIN6|APT41|Dragonfly 2.0|APT3
|
||||
T1110.002,Password Cracking,Credential Access,Dragonfly|FIN6|APT41|Dragonfly 2.0|APT3
|
||||
T1110.001,Password Guessing,Credential Access,APT28
|
||||
T1021.006,Windows Remote Management,Lateral Movement,APT29|Chimera|Wizard Spider|Threat Group-3390
|
||||
T1021.005,VNC,Lateral Movement,FIN7|Fox Kitten|GCMAN
|
||||
T1021.004,SSH,Lateral Movement,TeamTNT|FIN7|Fox Kitten|Rocke|TEMP.Veles|Leviathan|APT39|OilRig|menuPass|GCMAN
|
||||
T1021.005,VNC,Lateral Movement,Gamaredon Group|FIN7|Fox Kitten|GCMAN
|
||||
T1021.004,SSH,Lateral Movement,BlackTech|Lazarus Group|TeamTNT|FIN7|Fox Kitten|Rocke|TEMP.Veles|Leviathan|APT39|OilRig|menuPass|GCMAN
|
||||
T1021.003,Distributed Component Object Model,Lateral Movement,no
|
||||
T1021.002,SMB/Windows Admin Shares,Lateral Movement,Sandworm Team|APT28|Fox Kitten|APT41|Operation Wocao|Wizard Spider|Chimera|Blue Mockingbird|APT39|APT32|Orangeworm|FIN8|APT3|Lazarus Group|Threat Group-1314|Turla|Deep Panda|Ke3chang
|
||||
T1021.001,Remote Desktop Protocol,Lateral Movement,Kimsuky|FIN7|Fox Kitten|Chimera|Blue Mockingbird|Wizard Spider|Silence|APT41|TEMP.Veles|Leviathan|APT39|Cobalt Group|Dragonfly 2.0|FIN8|APT3|OilRig|FIN10|menuPass|Patchwork|FIN6|Lazarus Group|APT1|Axiom
|
||||
T1021.002,SMB/Windows Admin Shares,Lateral Movement,APT29|Sandworm Team|APT28|Fox Kitten|APT41|Operation Wocao|Wizard Spider|Chimera|Blue Mockingbird|APT39|APT32|Orangeworm|FIN8|APT3|Lazarus Group|Threat Group-1314|Turla|Deep Panda|Ke3chang
|
||||
T1021.001,Remote Desktop Protocol,Lateral Movement,APT29|Dragonfly|Kimsuky|FIN7|Fox Kitten|Chimera|Blue Mockingbird|Wizard Spider|Silence|APT41|TEMP.Veles|Leviathan|APT39|Cobalt Group|Dragonfly 2.0|FIN8|APT3|OilRig|FIN10|menuPass|Patchwork|FIN6|Lazarus Group|APT1|Axiom
|
||||
T1554,Compromise Client Software Binary,Persistence,no
|
||||
T1036.006,Space after Filename,Defense Evasion,no
|
||||
T1036.005,Match Legitimate Name or Location,Defense Evasion,APT28|Ferocious Kitten|FIN7|BackdoorDiplomacy|Transparent Tribe|Naikon|APT29|Mustang Panda|Sidewinder|Darkhotel|Lazarus Group|Indrik Spider|Fox Kitten|Machete|Chimera|PROMETHIUM|Rocke|Sandworm Team|APT39|Blue Mockingbird|Whitefly|Tropic Trooper|Silence|APT41|menuPass|TEMP.Veles|MuddyWater|Sowbug|BRONZE BUTLER|APT32|Patchwork|Poseidon Group|admin@338|Carbanak|APT1
|
||||
T1036.004,Masquerade Task or Service,Defense Evasion,BackdoorDiplomacy|APT41|Naikon|ZIRCONIUM|APT29|Higaisa|Fox Kitten|Kimsuky|PROMETHIUM|Wizard Spider|APT-C-36|Carbanak|APT32|FIN6|FIN7
|
||||
T1036.003,Rename System Utilities,Defense Evasion,menuPass|APT32|GALLIUM
|
||||
T1036.005,Match Legitimate Name or Location,Defense Evasion,Ke3chang|Kimsuky|Gamaredon Group|WIRTE|APT28|Ferocious Kitten|FIN7|BackdoorDiplomacy|Transparent Tribe|Naikon|APT29|Mustang Panda|Sidewinder|Darkhotel|Lazarus Group|Indrik Spider|Fox Kitten|Machete|Chimera|PROMETHIUM|Rocke|Sandworm Team|APT39|Blue Mockingbird|Whitefly|Tropic Trooper|Silence|APT41|menuPass|TEMP.Veles|MuddyWater|Sowbug|BRONZE BUTLER|APT32|Patchwork|Poseidon Group|admin@338|Carbanak|APT1
|
||||
T1036.004,Masquerade Task or Service,Defense Evasion,Lazarus Group|BackdoorDiplomacy|APT41|Naikon|ZIRCONIUM|APT29|Higaisa|Fox Kitten|Kimsuky|PROMETHIUM|Wizard Spider|APT-C-36|Carbanak|APT32|FIN6|FIN7
|
||||
T1036.003,Rename System Utilities,Defense Evasion,Lazarus Group|menuPass|APT32|GALLIUM
|
||||
T1036.002,Right-to-Left Override,Defense Evasion,Ferocious Kitten|BRONZE BUTLER|BlackTech|Ke3chang|Scarlet Mimic
|
||||
T1036.001,Invalid Code Signature,Defense Evasion,Windshift|APT37
|
||||
T1553.003,SIP and Trust Provider Hijacking,Defense Evasion,no
|
||||
T1553.002,Code Signing,Defense Evasion,menuPass|APT29|GALLIUM|Wizard Spider|Kimsuky|PROMETHIUM|Patchwork|Silence|APT41|FIN6|TA505|FIN7|Honeybee|Leviathan|CopyKittens|Winnti Group|Suckfly|Molerats|Darkhotel
|
||||
T1553.002,Code Signing,Defense Evasion,Lazarus Group|menuPass|APT29|GALLIUM|Wizard Spider|Kimsuky|PROMETHIUM|Patchwork|Silence|APT41|FIN6|TA505|FIN7|Honeybee|Leviathan|CopyKittens|Winnti Group|Suckfly|Molerats|Darkhotel
|
||||
T1553.001,Gatekeeper Bypass,Defense Evasion,no
|
||||
T1553,Subvert Trust Controls,Defense Evasion,no
|
||||
T1553,Subvert Trust Controls,Defense Evasion,Axiom
|
||||
T1027.003,Steganography,Defense Evasion,Andariel|Leviathan|TA551|BRONZE BUTLER|Tropic Trooper|MuddyWater|APT37
|
||||
T1027.002,Software Packing,Defense Evasion,Sandworm Team|Kimsuky|TeamTNT|ZIRCONIUM|TA505|Rocke|GALLIUM|The White Company|APT39|APT38|Dark Caracal|Elderwood|APT3|Patchwork|APT29|Night Dragon
|
||||
T1027.002,Software Packing,Defense Evasion,Threat Group-3390|Lazarus Group|Sandworm Team|Kimsuky|TeamTNT|ZIRCONIUM|TA505|Rocke|GALLIUM|The White Company|APT39|APT38|Dark Caracal|Elderwood|APT3|Patchwork|APT29|Night Dragon
|
||||
T1027.001,Binary Padding,Defense Evasion,APT29|Mustang Panda|Higaisa|Gamaredon Group|Patchwork|APT32|Leviathan|BRONZE BUTLER|Moafee
|
||||
T1222.002,Linux and Mac File and Directory Permissions Modification,Defense Evasion,TeamTNT|Rocke|APT32
|
||||
T1222.001,Windows File and Directory Permissions Modification,Defense Evasion,Wizard Spider
|
||||
@@ -342,10 +354,10 @@ T1552,Unsecured Credentials,Credential Access,no
|
||||
T1216.001,PubPrn,Defense Evasion,APT32
|
||||
T1070.006,Timestomp,Defense Evasion,APT38|APT29|Chimera|Kimsuky|Rocke|TEMP.Veles|APT32|Lazarus Group|APT28
|
||||
T1070.005,Network Share Connection Removal,Defense Evasion,Threat Group-3390
|
||||
T1070.004,File Deletion,Defense Evasion,TeamTNT|APT39|Mustang Panda|Chimera|Evilnum|Operation Wocao|FIN6|Sandworm Team|Rocke|Tropic Trooper|Gamaredon Group|Wizard Spider|APT41|Kimsuky|Silence|The White Company|TEMP.Veles|APT32|APT38|Cobalt Group|Dragonfly 2.0|Honeybee|Patchwork|menuPass|FIN8|OilRig|FIN5|BRONZE BUTLER|APT3|Magic Hound|Threat Group-3390|APT28|FIN10|Group5|Lazarus Group|APT18|APT29
|
||||
T1070.003,Clear Command History,Defense Evasion,TeamTNT|menuPass|APT41
|
||||
T1070.004,File Deletion,Defense Evasion,Aquatic Panda|Dragonfly|TeamTNT|APT39|Mustang Panda|Chimera|Evilnum|Operation Wocao|FIN6|Sandworm Team|Rocke|Tropic Trooper|Gamaredon Group|Wizard Spider|APT41|Kimsuky|Silence|The White Company|TEMP.Veles|APT32|APT38|Cobalt Group|Dragonfly 2.0|Honeybee|Patchwork|menuPass|FIN8|OilRig|FIN5|BRONZE BUTLER|APT3|Magic Hound|Threat Group-3390|APT28|FIN10|Group5|Lazarus Group|APT18|APT29
|
||||
T1070.003,Clear Command History,Defense Evasion,Lazarus Group|TeamTNT|menuPass|APT41
|
||||
T1550.004,Web Session Cookie,Defense Evasion|Lateral Movement,APT29
|
||||
T1550.001,Application Access Token,Defense Evasion|Lateral Movement,APT28
|
||||
T1550.001,Application Access Token,Defense Evasion|Lateral Movement,APT29|APT28
|
||||
T1550.003,Pass the Ticket,Defense Evasion|Lateral Movement,APT32|BRONZE BUTLER|APT29
|
||||
T1550.002,Pass the Hash,Defense Evasion|Lateral Movement,Chimera|Kimsuky|GALLIUM|APT32|Night Dragon|APT28|APT1
|
||||
T1550,Use Alternate Authentication Material,Defense Evasion|Lateral Movement,APT29
|
||||
@@ -354,14 +366,14 @@ T1548.003,Sudo and Sudo Caching,Privilege Escalation|Defense Evasion,no
|
||||
T1548.002,Bypass User Account Control,Privilege Escalation|Defense Evasion,Evilnum|APT37|MuddyWater|Threat Group-3390|Honeybee|Cobalt Group|BRONZE BUTLER|Patchwork|APT29
|
||||
T1548.001,Setuid and Setgid,Privilege Escalation|Defense Evasion,no
|
||||
T1548,Abuse Elevation Control Mechanism,Privilege Escalation|Defense Evasion,no
|
||||
T1136.003,Cloud Account,Persistence,no
|
||||
T1136.003,Cloud Account,Persistence,APT29
|
||||
T1070.002,Clear Linux or Mac System Logs,Defense Evasion,TeamTNT|Rocke
|
||||
T1070.001,Clear Windows Event Logs,Defense Evasion,Indrik Spider|Chimera|Operation Wocao|APT41|APT38|Dragonfly 2.0|APT32|FIN8|FIN5|APT28
|
||||
T1070.001,Clear Windows Event Logs,Defense Evasion,Dragonfly|Indrik Spider|Chimera|Operation Wocao|APT41|APT38|Dragonfly 2.0|APT32|FIN8|FIN5|APT28
|
||||
T1136.002,Domain Account,Persistence,Sandworm Team|HAFNIUM|GALLIUM
|
||||
T1136.001,Local Account,Persistence,TeamTNT|Fox Kitten|APT39|APT41|Leafminer|Dragonfly 2.0|APT3
|
||||
T1136.001,Local Account,Persistence,Kimsuky|Dragonfly|TeamTNT|Fox Kitten|APT39|APT41|Leafminer|Dragonfly 2.0|APT3
|
||||
T1547.011,Plist Modification,Persistence|Privilege Escalation,no
|
||||
T1547.010,Port Monitors,Persistence|Privilege Escalation,no
|
||||
T1547.009,Shortcut Modification,Persistence|Privilege Escalation,APT39|Darkhotel|APT29|Gorgon Group|Dragonfly 2.0|Lazarus Group|Leviathan
|
||||
T1547.009,Shortcut Modification,Persistence|Privilege Escalation,Dragonfly|APT39|Darkhotel|APT29|Gorgon Group|Dragonfly 2.0|Lazarus Group|Leviathan
|
||||
T1547.008,LSASS Driver,Persistence|Privilege Escalation,no
|
||||
T1547.007,Re-opened Applications,Persistence|Privilege Escalation,no
|
||||
T1547.006,Kernel Modules and Extensions,Persistence|Privilege Escalation,no
|
||||
@@ -385,18 +397,18 @@ T1546.004,Unix Shell Configuration Modification,Privilege Escalation|Persistence
|
||||
T1546.003,Windows Management Instrumentation Event Subscription,Privilege Escalation|Persistence,FIN8|Mustang Panda|APT33|Blue Mockingbird|Turla|Leviathan|APT29
|
||||
T1546.002,Screensaver,Privilege Escalation|Persistence,no
|
||||
T1546.001,Change Default File Association,Privilege Escalation|Persistence,Kimsuky
|
||||
T1547.001,Registry Run Keys / Startup Folder,Persistence|Privilege Escalation,TeamTNT|Naikon|Windshift|Mustang Panda|ZIRCONIUM|Higaisa|Sidewinder|APT28|Wizard Spider|PROMETHIUM|Rocke|Tropic Trooper|Gamaredon Group|Sharpshooter|Molerats|Silence|RTM|Inception|APT41|Kimsuky|APT33|APT39|APT32|APT18|Dark Caracal|Threat Group-3390|Honeybee|Turla|Cobalt Group|Ke3chang|Dragonfly 2.0|APT19|Gorgon Group|MuddyWater|APT37|Leviathan|BRONZE BUTLER|APT3|Magic Hound|FIN10|FIN7|Patchwork|FIN6|Lazarus Group|Putter Panda|APT29|Darkhotel
|
||||
T1547.001,Registry Run Keys / Startup Folder,Persistence|Privilege Escalation,Confucius|Dragonfly|LazyScripter|TeamTNT|Naikon|Windshift|Mustang Panda|ZIRCONIUM|Higaisa|Sidewinder|APT28|Wizard Spider|PROMETHIUM|Rocke|Tropic Trooper|Gamaredon Group|Sharpshooter|Molerats|Silence|RTM|Inception|APT41|Kimsuky|APT33|APT39|APT32|APT18|Dark Caracal|Threat Group-3390|Honeybee|Turla|Cobalt Group|Ke3chang|Dragonfly 2.0|APT19|Gorgon Group|MuddyWater|APT37|Leviathan|BRONZE BUTLER|APT3|Magic Hound|FIN10|FIN7|Patchwork|FIN6|Lazarus Group|Putter Panda|APT29|Darkhotel
|
||||
T1218.002,Control Panel,Defense Evasion,no
|
||||
T1218.010,Regsvr32,Defense Evasion,TA551|Blue Mockingbird|Inception|WIRTE|Cobalt Group|APT19|Leviathan|APT32|Deep Panda
|
||||
T1218.010,Regsvr32,Defense Evasion,Kimsuky|Lazarus Group|TA551|Blue Mockingbird|Inception|WIRTE|Cobalt Group|APT19|Leviathan|APT32|Deep Panda
|
||||
T1218.009,Regsvcs/Regasm,Defense Evasion,no
|
||||
T1218.005,Mshta,Defense Evasion,Mustang Panda|TA551|Sidewinder|Inception|Kimsuky|APT32|MuddyWater|FIN7
|
||||
T1218.005,Mshta,Defense Evasion,Gamaredon Group|Confucius|Lazarus Group|APT29|LazyScripter|Mustang Panda|TA551|Sidewinder|Inception|Kimsuky|APT32|MuddyWater|FIN7
|
||||
T1218.004,InstallUtil,Defense Evasion,Mustang Panda|menuPass
|
||||
T1218.001,Compiled HTML File,Defense Evasion,APT41|Silence|Dark Caracal|OilRig|Lazarus Group
|
||||
T1218.001,Compiled HTML File,Defense Evasion,APT38|APT41|Silence|Dark Caracal|OilRig|Lazarus Group
|
||||
T1218.003,CMSTP,Defense Evasion,Cobalt Group|MuddyWater
|
||||
T1218.011,Rundll32,Defense Evasion,APT38|HAFNIUM|TA551|APT41|Gamaredon Group|APT32|Sandworm Team|Blue Mockingbird|TA505|MuddyWater|APT29|APT19|CopyKittens|APT3|Carbanak|APT28
|
||||
T1218.011,Rundll32,Defense Evasion,Kimsuky|Lazarus Group|LazyScripter|APT38|HAFNIUM|TA551|APT41|Gamaredon Group|APT32|Sandworm Team|Blue Mockingbird|TA505|MuddyWater|APT29|APT19|CopyKittens|APT3|Carbanak|APT28
|
||||
T1547,Boot or Logon Autostart Execution,Persistence|Privilege Escalation,no
|
||||
T1546,Event Triggered Execution,Privilege Escalation|Persistence,no
|
||||
T1098.003,Add Office 365 Global Administrator Role,Persistence,no
|
||||
T1098.003,Add Office 365 Global Administrator Role,Persistence,APT29
|
||||
T1098.002,Exchange Email Delegate Permissions,Persistence,APT28|APT29|Magic Hound
|
||||
T1098.001,Additional Cloud Credentials,Persistence,APT29
|
||||
T1543.004,Launch Daemon,Persistence|Privilege Escalation,no
|
||||
@@ -405,7 +417,7 @@ T1543.002,Systemd Service,Persistence|Privilege Escalation,TeamTNT|Rocke
|
||||
T1543.001,Launch Agent,Persistence|Privilege Escalation,no
|
||||
T1037.005,Startup Items,Persistence|Privilege Escalation,no
|
||||
T1037.004,RC Scripts,Persistence|Privilege Escalation,no
|
||||
T1055.012,Process Hollowing,Defense Evasion|Privilege Escalation,Threat Group-3390|menuPass|Gorgon Group|Patchwork
|
||||
T1055.012,Process Hollowing,Defense Evasion|Privilege Escalation,Kimsuky|Threat Group-3390|menuPass|Gorgon Group|Patchwork
|
||||
T1055.013,Process Doppelgänging,Defense Evasion|Privilege Escalation,Leafminer
|
||||
T1055.011,Extra Window Memory Injection,Defense Evasion|Privilege Escalation,no
|
||||
T1055.014,VDSO Hijacking,Defense Evasion|Privilege Escalation,no
|
||||
@@ -423,12 +435,12 @@ T1037.001,Logon Script (Windows),Persistence|Privilege Escalation,Cobalt Group|A
|
||||
T1542.003,Bootkit,Persistence|Defense Evasion,APT41|Lazarus Group|APT28
|
||||
T1542.002,Component Firmware,Persistence|Defense Evasion,Equation
|
||||
T1542.001,System Firmware,Persistence|Defense Evasion,no
|
||||
T1505.003,Web Shell,Persistence,BackdoorDiplomacy|APT38|APT29|APT28|Tonto Team|Sandworm Team|HAFNIUM|Volatile Cedar|Fox Kitten|Operation Wocao|Kimsuky|Tropic Trooper|GALLIUM|Threat Group-3390|TEMP.Veles|Leviathan|APT39|Dragonfly 2.0|APT32|OilRig|Deep Panda
|
||||
T1505.003,Web Shell,Persistence,Dragonfly|BackdoorDiplomacy|APT38|APT29|APT28|Tonto Team|Sandworm Team|HAFNIUM|Volatile Cedar|Fox Kitten|Operation Wocao|Kimsuky|Tropic Trooper|GALLIUM|Threat Group-3390|TEMP.Veles|Leviathan|APT39|Dragonfly 2.0|APT32|OilRig|Deep Panda
|
||||
T1505.002,Transport Agent,Persistence,no
|
||||
T1505.001,SQL Stored Procedures,Persistence,Sandworm Team
|
||||
T1053.003,Cron,Execution|Persistence|Privilege Escalation,APT38|Rocke
|
||||
T1053.001,At (Linux),Execution|Persistence|Privilege Escalation,no
|
||||
T1053.005,Scheduled Task,Execution|Persistence|Privilege Escalation,APT37|APT38|Naikon|CostaRicto|Mustang Panda|Higaisa|Fox Kitten|Molerats|Machete|Operation Wocao|Chimera|Gamaredon Group|Blue Mockingbird|MuddyWater|Wizard Spider|Frankenstein|APT-C-36|BRONZE BUTLER|APT41|GALLIUM|Silence|TEMP.Veles|APT33|APT39|Rancor|OilRig|Patchwork|Dragonfly 2.0|Cobalt Group|FIN8|menuPass|FIN10|FIN7|APT32|Stealth Falcon|FIN6|APT3|APT29
|
||||
T1053.005,Scheduled Task,Execution|Persistence|Privilege Escalation,Kimsuky|Lazarus Group|Confucius|Dragonfly|APT37|APT38|Naikon|CostaRicto|Mustang Panda|Higaisa|Fox Kitten|Molerats|Machete|Operation Wocao|Chimera|Gamaredon Group|Blue Mockingbird|MuddyWater|Wizard Spider|Frankenstein|APT-C-36|BRONZE BUTLER|APT41|GALLIUM|Silence|TEMP.Veles|APT33|APT39|Rancor|OilRig|Patchwork|Dragonfly 2.0|Cobalt Group|FIN8|menuPass|FIN10|FIN7|APT32|Stealth Falcon|FIN6|APT3|APT29
|
||||
T1053.002,At (Windows),Execution|Persistence|Privilege Escalation,BRONZE BUTLER|Threat Group-3390|APT18
|
||||
T1542,Pre-OS Boot,Defense Evasion|Persistence,no
|
||||
T1137.001,Office Template Macros,Persistence,MuddyWater
|
||||
@@ -438,11 +450,11 @@ T1137.005,Outlook Rules,Persistence,no
|
||||
T1137.006,Add-ins,Persistence,Naikon
|
||||
T1137.002,Office Test,Persistence,APT28
|
||||
T1531,Account Access Removal,Impact,no
|
||||
T1539,Steal Web Session Cookie,Credential Access,Evilnum
|
||||
T1539,Steal Web Session Cookie,Credential Access,APT29|Evilnum
|
||||
T1529,System Shutdown/Reboot,Impact,Lazarus Group|APT38|APT37
|
||||
T1518,Software Discovery,Discovery,Mustang Panda|Windshift|MuddyWater|Windigo|Sidewinder|Operation Wocao|BRONZE BUTLER|Tropic Trooper|Inception
|
||||
T1547.013,XDG Autostart Entries,Persistence|Privilege Escalation,no
|
||||
T1534,Internal Spearphishing,Lateral Movement,Leviathan|Gamaredon Group
|
||||
T1534,Internal Spearphishing,Lateral Movement,Kimsuky|Lazarus Group|Leviathan|Gamaredon Group
|
||||
T1528,Steal Application Access Token,Credential Access,APT28
|
||||
T1535,Unused/Unsupported Cloud Regions,Defense Evasion,no
|
||||
T1525,Implant Internal Image,Persistence,no
|
||||
@@ -461,42 +473,42 @@ T1491,Defacement,Impact,no
|
||||
T1490,Inhibit System Recovery,Impact,no
|
||||
T1489,Service Stop,Impact,Indrik Spider|Wizard Spider|Lazarus Group
|
||||
T1486,Data Encrypted for Impact,Impact,FIN7|Indrik Spider|APT41|TA505|APT38
|
||||
T1485,Data Destruction,Impact,Sandworm Team|Lazarus Group|APT38
|
||||
T1485,Data Destruction,Impact,Gamaredon Group|Sandworm Team|Lazarus Group|APT38
|
||||
T1484,Domain Policy Modification,Defense Evasion|Privilege Escalation,no
|
||||
T1482,Domain Trust Discovery,Discovery,FIN8|APT29|Chimera
|
||||
T1480,Execution Guardrails,Defense Evasion,no
|
||||
T1221,Template Injection,Defense Evasion,Gamaredon Group|Frankenstein|Inception|APT28|Tropic Trooper|DarkHydrus|Dragonfly 2.0
|
||||
T1221,Template Injection,Defense Evasion,Lazarus Group|Confucius|Dragonfly|Gamaredon Group|Frankenstein|Inception|APT28|Tropic Trooper|DarkHydrus|Dragonfly 2.0
|
||||
T1222,File and Directory Permissions Modification,Defense Evasion,no
|
||||
T1220,XSL Script Processing,Defense Evasion,Higaisa|Cobalt Group
|
||||
T1220,XSL Script Processing,Defense Evasion,Lazarus Group|Higaisa|Cobalt Group
|
||||
T1217,Browser Bookmark Discovery,Discovery,APT38|Chimera|Fox Kitten
|
||||
T1212,Exploitation for Credential Access,Credential Access,no
|
||||
T1189,Drive-by Compromise,Initial Access,Transparent Tribe|Andariel|Leviathan|Machete|Windigo|Dragonfly|PROMETHIUM|Turla|Windshift|RTM|Darkhotel|APT38|APT19|Lazarus Group|Threat Group-3390|BRONZE BUTLER|APT32|Dark Caracal|Dragonfly 2.0|Leafminer|Patchwork|APT37|Elderwood|PLATINUM
|
||||
T1189,Drive-by Compromise,Initial Access,Magic Hound|APT28|Axiom|Transparent Tribe|Andariel|Leviathan|Machete|Windigo|Dragonfly|PROMETHIUM|Turla|Windshift|RTM|Darkhotel|APT38|APT19|Lazarus Group|Threat Group-3390|BRONZE BUTLER|APT32|Dark Caracal|Dragonfly 2.0|Leafminer|Patchwork|APT37|Elderwood|PLATINUM
|
||||
T1211,Exploitation for Defense Evasion,Defense Evasion,APT28
|
||||
T1197,BITS Jobs,Defense Evasion|Persistence,APT39|Patchwork|APT41|Leviathan
|
||||
T1203,Exploitation for Client Execution,Execution,Andariel|Transparent Tribe|APT3|Tonto Team|Mustang Panda|Darkhotel|Higaisa|HAFNIUM|Sidewinder|Sandworm Team|MuddyWater|Frankenstein|Inception|BlackTech|APT41|admin@338|Threat Group-3390|APT12|The White Company|APT33|APT32|APT28|Tropic Trooper|BRONZE BUTLER|Cobalt Group|Lazarus Group|Patchwork|Elderwood|APT29|TA459|APT37|Leviathan
|
||||
T1203,Exploitation for Client Execution,Execution,Axiom|Confucius|Dragonfly|Andariel|Transparent Tribe|APT3|Tonto Team|Mustang Panda|Darkhotel|Higaisa|HAFNIUM|Sidewinder|Sandworm Team|MuddyWater|Frankenstein|Inception|BlackTech|APT41|admin@338|Threat Group-3390|APT12|The White Company|APT33|APT32|APT28|Tropic Trooper|BRONZE BUTLER|Cobalt Group|Lazarus Group|Patchwork|Elderwood|APT29|TA459|APT37|Leviathan
|
||||
T1201,Password Policy Discovery,Discovery,Chimera|Turla|OilRig
|
||||
T1195,Supply Chain Compromise,Initial Access,no
|
||||
T1199,Trusted Relationship,Initial Access,APT29|Sandworm Team|GOLD SOUTHFIELD|APT28|menuPass
|
||||
T1218,Signed Binary Proxy Execution,Defense Evasion,no
|
||||
T1199,Trusted Relationship,Initial Access,Threat Group-3390|APT29|Sandworm Team|GOLD SOUTHFIELD|APT28|menuPass
|
||||
T1218,Signed Binary Proxy Execution,Defense Evasion,Lazarus Group
|
||||
T1204,User Execution,Execution,no
|
||||
T1213,Data from Information Repositories,Collection,APT28|Fox Kitten|FIN6|Turla
|
||||
T1190,Exploit Public-Facing Application,Initial Access,BackdoorDiplomacy|menuPass|Volatile Cedar|Fox Kitten|Operation Wocao|APT28|APT29|GOLD SOUTHFIELD|Blue Mockingbird|Rocke|APT39|BlackTech|APT41|GALLIUM|Night Dragon|Axiom
|
||||
T1210,Exploitation of Remote Services,Lateral Movement,Tonto Team|FIN7|Fox Kitten|menuPass|Wizard Spider|Threat Group-3390|APT28
|
||||
T1213,Data from Information Repositories,Collection,APT29|APT28|Fox Kitten|FIN6|Turla
|
||||
T1190,Exploit Public-Facing Application,Initial Access,Threat Group-3390|Ke3chang|Kimsuky|Magic Hound|Dragonfly|BackdoorDiplomacy|menuPass|Volatile Cedar|Fox Kitten|Operation Wocao|APT28|APT29|GOLD SOUTHFIELD|Blue Mockingbird|Rocke|APT39|BlackTech|APT41|GALLIUM|Night Dragon|Axiom
|
||||
T1210,Exploitation of Remote Services,Lateral Movement,Dragonfly|Tonto Team|FIN7|Fox Kitten|menuPass|Wizard Spider|Threat Group-3390|APT28
|
||||
T1200,Hardware Additions,Initial Access,DarkVishnya
|
||||
T1202,Indirect Command Execution,Defense Evasion,no
|
||||
T1202,Indirect Command Execution,Defense Evasion,Lazarus Group
|
||||
T1219,Remote Access Software,Command And Control,TeamTNT|Mustang Panda|MuddyWater|Evilnum|GOLD SOUTHFIELD|Sandworm Team|DarkVishnya|RTM|Kimsuky|Night Dragon|Cobalt Group|Thrip|Carbanak
|
||||
T1207,Rogue Domain Controller,Defense Evasion,no
|
||||
T1216,Signed Script Proxy Execution,Defense Evasion,no
|
||||
T1205,Traffic Signaling,Defense Evasion|Persistence|Command And Control,no
|
||||
T1176,Browser Extensions,Persistence,Kimsuky
|
||||
T1187,Forced Authentication,Credential Access,DarkHydrus|Dragonfly 2.0
|
||||
T1187,Forced Authentication,Credential Access,Dragonfly|DarkHydrus|Dragonfly 2.0
|
||||
T1185,Browser Session Hijacking,Collection,no
|
||||
T1140,Deobfuscate/Decode Files or Information,Defense Evasion,APT39|APT29|ZIRCONIUM|Higaisa|Rocke|Sandworm Team|Gamaredon Group|Molerats|Frankenstein|Turla|WIRTE|Darkhotel|Tropic Trooper|Honeybee|Gorgon Group|Threat Group-3390|menuPass|APT19|Leviathan|MuddyWater|APT28|OilRig|BRONZE BUTLER
|
||||
T1140,Deobfuscate/Decode Files or Information,Defense Evasion,Lazarus Group|Ke3chang|Kimsuky|APT39|APT29|ZIRCONIUM|Higaisa|Rocke|Sandworm Team|Gamaredon Group|Molerats|Frankenstein|Turla|WIRTE|Darkhotel|Tropic Trooper|Honeybee|Gorgon Group|Threat Group-3390|menuPass|APT19|Leviathan|MuddyWater|APT28|OilRig|BRONZE BUTLER
|
||||
T1134,Access Token Manipulation,Defense Evasion|Privilege Escalation,FIN6|Blue Mockingbird
|
||||
T1136,Create Account,Persistence,Sandworm Team|Indrik Spider
|
||||
T1135,Network Share Discovery,Discovery,Tonto Team|APT38|Chimera|Operation Wocao|Wizard Spider|APT32|APT39|DarkVishnya|APT41|Tropic Trooper|APT1|Dragonfly 2.0|Sowbug
|
||||
T1135,Network Share Discovery,Discovery,Dragonfly|Tonto Team|APT38|Chimera|Operation Wocao|Wizard Spider|APT32|APT39|DarkVishnya|APT41|Tropic Trooper|APT1|Dragonfly 2.0|Sowbug
|
||||
T1137,Office Application Startup,Persistence,Gamaredon Group|APT32
|
||||
T1133,External Remote Services,Persistence|Initial Access,TeamTNT|Leviathan|APT28|APT29|Operation Wocao|Wizard Spider|Kimsuky|GOLD SOUTHFIELD|Chimera|Sandworm Team|APT41|GALLIUM|TEMP.Veles|Night Dragon|Ke3chang|OilRig|Dragonfly 2.0|FIN5|Threat Group-3390|APT18
|
||||
T1133,External Remote Services,Persistence|Initial Access,Dragonfly|TeamTNT|Leviathan|APT28|APT29|Operation Wocao|Wizard Spider|Kimsuky|GOLD SOUTHFIELD|Chimera|Sandworm Team|APT41|GALLIUM|TEMP.Veles|Night Dragon|Ke3chang|OilRig|Dragonfly 2.0|FIN5|Threat Group-3390|APT18
|
||||
T1132,Data Encoding,Command And Control,no
|
||||
T1129,Shared Modules,Execution,no
|
||||
T1127,Trusted Developer Utilities Proxy Execution,Defense Evasion,no
|
||||
@@ -504,64 +516,64 @@ T1125,Video Capture,Collection,Silence|FIN7
|
||||
T1124,System Time Discovery,Discovery,Darkhotel|ZIRCONIUM|Higaisa|Sidewinder|Chimera|Operation Wocao|The White Company|Lazarus Group|BRONZE BUTLER|Turla
|
||||
T1123,Audio Capture,Collection,APT37
|
||||
T1120,Peripheral Device Discovery,Discovery,OilRig|BackdoorDiplomacy|Operation Wocao|Turla|APT37|Gamaredon Group|Equation|APT28
|
||||
T1119,Automated Collection,Collection,Mustang Panda|Sidewinder|Chimera|menuPass|Operation Wocao|Gamaredon Group|Tropic Trooper|Frankenstein|APT1|APT28|Patchwork|OilRig|FIN5|Threat Group-3390|FIN6
|
||||
T1119,Automated Collection,Collection,Ke3chang|Confucius|Mustang Panda|Sidewinder|Chimera|menuPass|Operation Wocao|Gamaredon Group|Tropic Trooper|Frankenstein|APT1|APT28|Patchwork|OilRig|FIN5|Threat Group-3390|FIN6
|
||||
T1115,Clipboard Data,Collection,Operation Wocao|APT39|APT38
|
||||
T1114,Email Collection,Collection,Magic Hound|Silent Librarian
|
||||
T1113,Screen Capture,Collection,GOLD SOUTHFIELD|Gamaredon Group|APT39|Silence|MuddyWater|Dragonfly 2.0|OilRig|Dark Caracal|FIN7|BRONZE BUTLER|Magic Hound|Group5|APT28
|
||||
T1112,Modify Registry,Defense Evasion,Operation Wocao|Kimsuky|Gamaredon Group|Blue Mockingbird|Wizard Spider|Silence|APT41|Turla|APT32|APT38|Patchwork|Gorgon Group|Threat Group-3390|Dragonfly 2.0|APT19|Honeybee|FIN8
|
||||
T1111,Two-Factor Authentication Interception,Credential Access,Chimera|Operation Wocao
|
||||
T1110,Brute Force,Credential Access,APT38|APT28|Fox Kitten|DarkVishnya|APT39|OilRig|FIN5|Turla
|
||||
T1106,Native API,Execution,APT38|Higaisa|menuPass|Operation Wocao|Chimera|Gamaredon Group|Tropic Trooper|Sharpshooter|Turla|Silence|APT37|Gorgon Group
|
||||
T1105,Ingress Tool Transfer,Command And Control,TeamTNT|Nomadic Octopus|IndigoZebra|Andariel|BackdoorDiplomacy|Tonto Team|HAFNIUM|APT29|Ajax Security Team|Mustang Panda|Windshift|Darkhotel|ZIRCONIUM|TA551|Volatile Cedar|Indrik Spider|Evilnum|Sidewinder|Fox Kitten|Kimsuky|Operation Wocao|Chimera|Sandworm Team|Whitefly|Rocke|APT39|Tropic Trooper|Sharpshooter|Molerats|Frankenstein|Silence|APT-C-36|APT41|GALLIUM|TA505|WIRTE|APT33|MuddyWater|APT18|APT38|Rancor|Gorgon Group|OilRig|Turla|Cobalt Group|Dragonfly 2.0|FIN8|PLATINUM|APT37|Elderwood|Leviathan|APT32|Magic Hound|BRONZE BUTLER|APT3|menuPass|FIN7|Gamaredon Group|Patchwork|Lazarus Group|Threat Group-3390|APT28
|
||||
T1104,Multi-Stage Channels,Command And Control,APT41|MuddyWater|APT3
|
||||
T1102,Web Service,Command And Control,TeamTNT|FIN8|Fox Kitten|Turla|APT32|Gamaredon Group|Rocke|Inception|FIN6
|
||||
T1098,Account Manipulation,Persistence,Sandworm Team|APT3|Dragonfly 2.0|Lazarus Group
|
||||
T1113,Screen Capture,Collection,Dragonfly|GOLD SOUTHFIELD|Gamaredon Group|APT39|Silence|MuddyWater|Dragonfly 2.0|OilRig|Dark Caracal|FIN7|BRONZE BUTLER|Magic Hound|Group5|APT28
|
||||
T1112,Modify Registry,Defense Evasion,Dragonfly|Operation Wocao|Kimsuky|Gamaredon Group|Blue Mockingbird|Wizard Spider|Silence|APT41|Turla|APT32|APT38|Patchwork|Gorgon Group|Threat Group-3390|Dragonfly 2.0|APT19|Honeybee|FIN8
|
||||
T1111,Two-Factor Authentication Interception,Credential Access,Kimsuky|Chimera|Operation Wocao
|
||||
T1110,Brute Force,Credential Access,Lazarus Group|Dragonfly|APT38|APT28|Fox Kitten|DarkVishnya|APT39|OilRig|FIN5|Turla
|
||||
T1106,Native API,Execution,BlackTech|Lazarus Group|APT38|Higaisa|menuPass|Operation Wocao|Chimera|Gamaredon Group|Tropic Trooper|Sharpshooter|Turla|Silence|APT37|Gorgon Group
|
||||
T1105,Ingress Tool Transfer,Command And Control,LazyScripter|Ke3chang|Aquatic Panda|Winnti Group|Confucius|Dragonfly|TeamTNT|Nomadic Octopus|IndigoZebra|Andariel|BackdoorDiplomacy|Tonto Team|HAFNIUM|APT29|Ajax Security Team|Mustang Panda|Windshift|Darkhotel|ZIRCONIUM|TA551|Volatile Cedar|Indrik Spider|Evilnum|Sidewinder|Fox Kitten|Kimsuky|Operation Wocao|Chimera|Sandworm Team|Whitefly|Rocke|APT39|Tropic Trooper|Sharpshooter|Molerats|Frankenstein|Silence|APT-C-36|APT41|GALLIUM|TA505|WIRTE|APT33|MuddyWater|APT18|APT38|Rancor|Gorgon Group|OilRig|Turla|Cobalt Group|Dragonfly 2.0|FIN8|PLATINUM|APT37|Elderwood|Leviathan|APT32|Magic Hound|BRONZE BUTLER|APT3|menuPass|FIN7|Gamaredon Group|Patchwork|Lazarus Group|Threat Group-3390|APT28
|
||||
T1104,Multi-Stage Channels,Command And Control,Lazarus Group|APT41|MuddyWater|APT3
|
||||
T1102,Web Service,Command And Control,Mustang Panda|LazyScripter|TeamTNT|FIN8|Fox Kitten|Turla|APT32|Gamaredon Group|Rocke|Inception|FIN6
|
||||
T1098,Account Manipulation,Persistence,Kimsuky|Dragonfly|Sandworm Team|APT3|Dragonfly 2.0|Lazarus Group
|
||||
T1095,Non-Application Layer Protocol,Command And Control,BackdoorDiplomacy|HAFNIUM|Operation Wocao|FIN6|APT29|PLATINUM|APT3
|
||||
T1092,Communication Through Removable Media,Command And Control,APT28
|
||||
T1091,Replication Through Removable Media,Lateral Movement|Initial Access,Mustang Panda|Tropic Trooper|Darkhotel|APT28
|
||||
T1091,Replication Through Removable Media,Lateral Movement|Initial Access,FIN7|Mustang Panda|Tropic Trooper|Darkhotel|APT28
|
||||
T1090,Proxy,Command And Control,Windigo|Fox Kitten|Operation Wocao|Sandworm Team|Blue Mockingbird|APT41|Turla
|
||||
T1087,Account Discovery,Discovery,APT29
|
||||
T1083,File and Directory Discovery,Discovery,APT38|APT29|Mustang Panda|Darkhotel|Windigo|Sidewinder|Chimera|Fox Kitten|menuPass|APT39|Sandworm Team|Operation Wocao|Gamaredon Group|Tropic Trooper|Inception|APT41|Kimsuky|APT32|MuddyWater|APT18|Leafminer|Honeybee|Dark Caracal|Dragonfly 2.0|APT3|Sowbug|Magic Hound|BRONZE BUTLER|APT28|Patchwork|Lazarus Group|Dust Storm|admin@338|Turla|Ke3chang
|
||||
T1082,System Information Discovery,Discovery,TeamTNT|APT38|APT29|Mustang Panda|Windshift|ZIRCONIUM|Higaisa|Windigo|Sidewinder|Chimera|Operation Wocao|Wizard Spider|Rocke|Sandworm Team|Blue Mockingbird|Tropic Trooper|Frankenstein|Inception|Kimsuky|Darkhotel|MuddyWater|APT18|APT32|APT37|Honeybee|APT19|Magic Hound|Sowbug|OilRig|APT3|Gamaredon Group|Patchwork|Stealth Falcon|Lazarus Group|admin@338|Turla|Ke3chang
|
||||
T1083,File and Directory Discovery,Discovery,Winnti Group|Confucius|Dragonfly|APT38|APT29|Mustang Panda|Darkhotel|Windigo|Sidewinder|Chimera|Fox Kitten|menuPass|APT39|Sandworm Team|Operation Wocao|Gamaredon Group|Tropic Trooper|Inception|APT41|Kimsuky|APT32|MuddyWater|APT18|Leafminer|Honeybee|Dark Caracal|Dragonfly 2.0|APT3|Sowbug|Magic Hound|BRONZE BUTLER|APT28|Patchwork|Lazarus Group|Dust Storm|admin@338|Turla|Ke3chang
|
||||
T1082,System Information Discovery,Discovery,Aquatic Panda|Confucius|TeamTNT|APT38|APT29|Mustang Panda|Windshift|ZIRCONIUM|Higaisa|Windigo|Sidewinder|Chimera|Operation Wocao|Wizard Spider|Rocke|Sandworm Team|Blue Mockingbird|Tropic Trooper|Frankenstein|Inception|Kimsuky|Darkhotel|MuddyWater|APT18|APT32|APT37|Honeybee|APT19|Magic Hound|Sowbug|OilRig|APT3|Gamaredon Group|Patchwork|Stealth Falcon|Lazarus Group|admin@338|Turla|Ke3chang
|
||||
T1080,Taint Shared Content,Lateral Movement,Gamaredon Group|BRONZE BUTLER|Darkhotel
|
||||
T1078,Valid Accounts,Defense Evasion|Persistence|Privilege Escalation|Initial Access,FIN7|Leviathan|APT29|Silent Librarian|Fox Kitten|Operation Wocao|Chimera|Sandworm Team|Wizard Spider|Silence|APT41|GALLIUM|TEMP.Veles|APT39|FIN4|Night Dragon|Dragonfly 2.0|FIN8|APT33|FIN5|OilRig|APT28|menuPass|FIN10|Suckfly|FIN6|Threat Group-3390|APT18|PittyTiger|Carbanak
|
||||
T1078,Valid Accounts,Defense Evasion|Persistence|Privilege Escalation|Initial Access,Ke3chang|Lazarus Group|Axiom|Dragonfly|FIN7|Leviathan|APT29|Silent Librarian|Fox Kitten|Operation Wocao|Chimera|Sandworm Team|Wizard Spider|Silence|APT41|GALLIUM|TEMP.Veles|APT39|FIN4|Night Dragon|Dragonfly 2.0|FIN8|APT33|FIN5|OilRig|APT28|menuPass|FIN10|Suckfly|FIN6|Threat Group-3390|APT18|PittyTiger|Carbanak
|
||||
T1074,Data Staged,Collection,Wizard Spider
|
||||
T1072,Software Deployment Tools,Execution|Lateral Movement,Silence|APT32|Threat Group-1314
|
||||
T1071,Application Layer Protocol,Command And Control,TeamTNT|Rocke|Magic Hound|Dragonfly 2.0
|
||||
T1070,Indicator Removal on Host,Defense Evasion,APT29
|
||||
T1071,Application Layer Protocol,Command And Control,Dragonfly|TeamTNT|Rocke|Magic Hound|Dragonfly 2.0
|
||||
T1070,Indicator Removal on Host,Defense Evasion,Lazarus Group|APT29
|
||||
T1069,Permission Groups Discovery,Discovery,APT29|TA505|APT3
|
||||
T1068,Exploitation for Privilege Escalation,Privilege Escalation,Tonto Team|ZIRCONIUM|Turla|Whitefly|APT33|Cobalt Group|PLATINUM|FIN8|APT32|Threat Group-3390|FIN6|APT28
|
||||
T1059,Command and Scripting Interpreter,Execution,APT37|Windigo|Fox Kitten|APT32|Whitefly|APT39|Dragonfly 2.0|FIN7|APT19|OilRig|FIN5|Stealth Falcon|FIN6|Ke3chang
|
||||
T1057,Process Discovery,Discovery,TeamTNT|Andariel|APT29|Mustang Panda|Windshift|Higaisa|Sidewinder|Chimera|Operation Wocao|Rocke|Frankenstein|Inception|Darkhotel|MuddyWater|APT1|APT38|Tropic Trooper|APT37|Honeybee|OilRig|APT3|Magic Hound|APT28|Winnti Group|Stealth Falcon|Poseidon Group|Lazarus Group|Molerats|Turla|Deep Panda|Ke3chang
|
||||
T1068,Exploitation for Privilege Escalation,Privilege Escalation,APT29|Tonto Team|ZIRCONIUM|Turla|Whitefly|APT33|Cobalt Group|PLATINUM|FIN8|APT32|Threat Group-3390|FIN6|APT28
|
||||
T1059,Command and Scripting Interpreter,Execution,Dragonfly|APT37|Windigo|Fox Kitten|APT32|Whitefly|APT39|Dragonfly 2.0|FIN7|APT19|OilRig|FIN5|Stealth Falcon|FIN6|Ke3chang
|
||||
T1057,Process Discovery,Discovery,Gamaredon Group|Kimsuky|TeamTNT|Andariel|APT29|Mustang Panda|Windshift|Higaisa|Sidewinder|Chimera|Operation Wocao|Rocke|Frankenstein|Inception|Darkhotel|MuddyWater|APT1|APT38|Tropic Trooper|APT37|Honeybee|OilRig|APT3|Magic Hound|APT28|Winnti Group|Stealth Falcon|Poseidon Group|Lazarus Group|Molerats|Turla|Deep Panda|Ke3chang
|
||||
T1056,Input Capture,Collection|Credential Access,APT39
|
||||
T1055,Process Injection,Defense Evasion|Privilege Escalation,Operation Wocao|APT32|Sharpshooter|Silence|APT41|Kimsuky|Cobalt Group|Turla|APT37|Honeybee|PLATINUM
|
||||
T1053,Scheduled Task/Job,Execution|Persistence|Privilege Escalation,no
|
||||
T1052,Exfiltration Over Physical Medium,Exfiltration,no
|
||||
T1049,System Network Connections Discovery,Discovery,TeamTNT|Andariel|BackdoorDiplomacy|Mustang Panda|MuddyWater|Chimera|Sandworm Team|Operation Wocao|Tropic Trooper|APT41|APT38|GALLIUM|APT32|APT1|OilRig|APT3|menuPass|Threat Group-3390|Poseidon Group|admin@338|Turla|Ke3chang
|
||||
T1049,System Network Connections Discovery,Discovery,Lazarus Group|TeamTNT|Andariel|BackdoorDiplomacy|Mustang Panda|MuddyWater|Chimera|Sandworm Team|Operation Wocao|Tropic Trooper|APT41|APT38|GALLIUM|APT32|APT1|OilRig|APT3|menuPass|Threat Group-3390|Poseidon Group|admin@338|Turla|Ke3chang
|
||||
T1048,Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol,Exfiltration,no
|
||||
T1047,Windows Management Instrumentation,Execution,Sandworm Team|FIN7|Indrik Spider|Naikon|Mustang Panda|Windshift|Operation Wocao|Chimera|Blue Mockingbird|Wizard Spider|Frankenstein|APT41|FIN6|GALLIUM|APT32|MuddyWater|Threat Group-3390|OilRig|FIN8|Leviathan|menuPass|Stealth Falcon|Lazarus Group|APT29|Deep Panda
|
||||
T1046,Network Service Scanning,Discovery,TeamTNT|BackdoorDiplomacy|Naikon|CostaRicto|Chimera|Fox Kitten|Operation Wocao|Rocke|DarkVishnya|APT41|Tropic Trooper|APT39|APT32|OilRig|Cobalt Group|Leafminer|menuPass|Suckfly|FIN6|Threat Group-3390
|
||||
T1041,Exfiltration Over C2 Channel,Exfiltration,Leviathan|ZIRCONIUM|Higaisa|Chimera|APT39|Operation Wocao|Sandworm Team|MuddyWater|Wizard Spider|Frankenstein|Kimsuky|GALLIUM|APT32|APT3|Gamaredon Group|Stealth Falcon|Lazarus Group|Ke3chang
|
||||
T1047,Windows Management Instrumentation,Execution,Gamaredon Group|Sandworm Team|FIN7|Indrik Spider|Naikon|Mustang Panda|Windshift|Operation Wocao|Chimera|Blue Mockingbird|Wizard Spider|Frankenstein|APT41|FIN6|GALLIUM|APT32|MuddyWater|Threat Group-3390|OilRig|FIN8|Leviathan|menuPass|Stealth Falcon|Lazarus Group|APT29|Deep Panda
|
||||
T1046,Network Service Scanning,Discovery,BlackTech|Lazarus Group|TeamTNT|BackdoorDiplomacy|Naikon|CostaRicto|Chimera|Fox Kitten|Operation Wocao|Rocke|DarkVishnya|APT41|Tropic Trooper|APT39|APT32|OilRig|Cobalt Group|Leafminer|menuPass|Suckfly|FIN6|Threat Group-3390
|
||||
T1041,Exfiltration Over C2 Channel,Exfiltration,Confucius|Leviathan|ZIRCONIUM|Higaisa|Chimera|APT39|Operation Wocao|Sandworm Team|MuddyWater|Wizard Spider|Frankenstein|Kimsuky|GALLIUM|APT32|APT3|Gamaredon Group|Stealth Falcon|Lazarus Group|Ke3chang
|
||||
T1040,Network Sniffing,Credential Access|Discovery,Kimsuky|Sandworm Team|DarkVishnya|APT33|APT28
|
||||
T1039,Data from Network Shared Drive,Collection,APT28|Chimera|Fox Kitten|Gamaredon Group|BRONZE BUTLER|Sowbug|menuPass
|
||||
T1037,Boot or Logon Initialization Scripts,Persistence|Privilege Escalation,Rocke
|
||||
T1036,Masquerading,Defense Evasion,APT28|Nomadic Octopus|OilRig|APT29|ZIRCONIUM|TA551|Windshift|APT32|BRONZE BUTLER|menuPass|PLATINUM|Dragonfly 2.0
|
||||
T1033,System Owner/User Discovery,Discovery,APT38|Windshift|ZIRCONIUM|Sidewinder|Chimera|Sandworm Team|Operation Wocao|Wizard Spider|Frankenstein|APT41|GALLIUM|Tropic Trooper|APT39|MuddyWater|APT37|Dragonfly 2.0|APT19|APT32|Magic Hound|OilRig|FIN10|Gamaredon Group|Patchwork|Stealth Falcon|Lazarus Group|APT3
|
||||
T1036,Masquerading,Defense Evasion,Kimsuky|Lazarus Group|Dragonfly|LazyScripter|APT28|Nomadic Octopus|OilRig|APT29|ZIRCONIUM|TA551|Windshift|APT32|BRONZE BUTLER|menuPass|PLATINUM|Dragonfly 2.0
|
||||
T1033,System Owner/User Discovery,Discovery,Threat Group-3390|Ke3chang|Dragonfly|APT38|Windshift|ZIRCONIUM|Sidewinder|Chimera|Sandworm Team|Operation Wocao|Wizard Spider|Frankenstein|APT41|GALLIUM|Tropic Trooper|APT39|MuddyWater|APT37|Dragonfly 2.0|APT19|APT32|Magic Hound|OilRig|FIN10|Gamaredon Group|Patchwork|Stealth Falcon|Lazarus Group|APT3
|
||||
T1030,Data Transfer Size Limits,Exfiltration,APT28|Threat Group-3390
|
||||
T1029,Scheduled Transfer,Exfiltration,Higaisa
|
||||
T1027,Obfuscated Files or Information,Defense Evasion,TeamTNT|BackdoorDiplomacy|Transparent Tribe|APT39|Mustang Panda|Windshift|TA551|Higaisa|Sidewinder|Fox Kitten|GOLD SOUTHFIELD|Operation Wocao|Kimsuky|FIN6|Chimera|Gamaredon Group|Rocke|Sandworm Team|Blue Mockingbird|Whitefly|Molerats|Wizard Spider|Mofang|Frankenstein|Inception|APT-C-36|APT41|GALLIUM|Turla|TA505|Silence|APT33|Night Dragon|Darkhotel|Gallmaker|APT29|APT18|Tropic Trooper|Patchwork|menuPass|APT37|Threat Group-3390|Cobalt Group|Dark Caracal|Leafminer|Honeybee|APT19|BlackOasis|Leviathan|FIN8|MuddyWater|FIN7|Elderwood|OilRig|Magic Hound|APT3|APT32|Group5|Dust Storm|Lazarus Group|Putter Panda|APT28
|
||||
T1027,Obfuscated Files or Information,Defense Evasion,Aquatic Panda|Ke3chang|LazyScripter|TeamTNT|BackdoorDiplomacy|Transparent Tribe|APT39|Mustang Panda|Windshift|TA551|Higaisa|Sidewinder|Fox Kitten|GOLD SOUTHFIELD|Operation Wocao|Kimsuky|FIN6|Chimera|Gamaredon Group|Rocke|Sandworm Team|Blue Mockingbird|Whitefly|Molerats|Wizard Spider|Mofang|Frankenstein|Inception|APT-C-36|APT41|GALLIUM|Turla|TA505|Silence|APT33|Night Dragon|Darkhotel|Gallmaker|APT29|APT18|Tropic Trooper|Patchwork|menuPass|APT37|Threat Group-3390|Cobalt Group|Dark Caracal|Leafminer|Honeybee|APT19|BlackOasis|Leviathan|FIN8|MuddyWater|FIN7|Elderwood|OilRig|Magic Hound|APT3|APT32|Group5|Dust Storm|Lazarus Group|Putter Panda|APT28
|
||||
T1025,Data from Removable Media,Collection,Turla|Gamaredon Group|APT28
|
||||
T1021,Remote Services,Lateral Movement,no
|
||||
T1020,Automated Exfiltration,Exfiltration,Sidewinder|Gamaredon Group|Tropic Trooper|Frankenstein|Honeybee
|
||||
T1018,Remote System Discovery,Discovery,Indrik Spider|Naikon|APT29|Chimera|Fox Kitten|Operation Wocao|Sandworm Team|Rocke|Wizard Spider|Silence|GALLIUM|APT39|APT32|Deep Panda|Ke3chang|Threat Group-3390|Dragonfly 2.0|Leafminer|FIN8|FIN5|APT3|BRONZE BUTLER|menuPass|FIN6|Turla
|
||||
T1016,System Network Configuration Discovery,Discovery,TeamTNT|ZIRCONIUM|Mustang Panda|Higaisa|Sidewinder|Chimera|Operation Wocao|Wizard Spider|Sandworm Team|Tropic Trooper|Frankenstein|APT41|GALLIUM|APT32|Darkhotel|MuddyWater|APT1|APT19|Dragonfly 2.0|Magic Hound|OilRig|Threat Group-3390|menuPass|Stealth Falcon|Lazarus Group|APT3|Naikon|admin@338|Turla|Ke3chang
|
||||
T1020,Automated Exfiltration,Exfiltration,Ke3chang|Sidewinder|Gamaredon Group|Tropic Trooper|Frankenstein|Honeybee
|
||||
T1018,Remote System Discovery,Discovery,Dragonfly|Indrik Spider|Naikon|APT29|Chimera|Fox Kitten|Operation Wocao|Sandworm Team|Rocke|Wizard Spider|Silence|GALLIUM|APT39|APT32|Deep Panda|Ke3chang|Threat Group-3390|Dragonfly 2.0|Leafminer|FIN8|FIN5|APT3|BRONZE BUTLER|menuPass|FIN6|Turla
|
||||
T1016,System Network Configuration Discovery,Discovery,Kimsuky|Dragonfly|TeamTNT|ZIRCONIUM|Mustang Panda|Higaisa|Sidewinder|Chimera|Operation Wocao|Wizard Spider|Sandworm Team|Tropic Trooper|Frankenstein|APT41|GALLIUM|APT32|Darkhotel|MuddyWater|APT1|APT19|Dragonfly 2.0|Magic Hound|OilRig|Threat Group-3390|menuPass|Stealth Falcon|Lazarus Group|APT3|Naikon|admin@338|Turla|Ke3chang
|
||||
T1014,Rootkit,Defense Evasion,TeamTNT|Rocke|APT41|APT28|Winnti Group
|
||||
T1012,Query Registry,Discovery,ZIRCONIUM|Chimera|Fox Kitten|APT39|Operation Wocao|APT32|Dragonfly 2.0|Threat Group-3390|OilRig|Stealth Falcon|Lazarus Group|Turla
|
||||
T1012,Query Registry,Discovery,Kimsuky|Dragonfly|ZIRCONIUM|Chimera|Fox Kitten|APT39|Operation Wocao|APT32|Dragonfly 2.0|Threat Group-3390|OilRig|Stealth Falcon|Lazarus Group|Turla
|
||||
T1011,Exfiltration Over Other Network Medium,Exfiltration,no
|
||||
T1010,Application Window Discovery,Discovery,Lazarus Group
|
||||
T1008,Fallback Channels,Command And Control,FIN7|APT41|OilRig|Lazarus Group
|
||||
T1007,System Service Discovery,Discovery,Indrik Spider|Chimera|Operation Wocao|BRONZE BUTLER|APT1|OilRig|Poseidon Group|admin@338|Turla|Ke3chang
|
||||
T1007,System Service Discovery,Discovery,Kimsuky|Aquatic Panda|Indrik Spider|Chimera|Operation Wocao|BRONZE BUTLER|APT1|OilRig|Poseidon Group|admin@338|Turla|Ke3chang
|
||||
T1006,Direct Volume Access,Defense Evasion,no
|
||||
T1005,Data from Local System,Collection,FIN7|APT41|APT38|Andariel|APT29|Windigo|Fox Kitten|Sandworm Team|Operation Wocao|FIN6|Gamaredon Group|APT39|Frankenstein|Inception|Kimsuky|GALLIUM|Turla|menuPass|Dark Caracal|Dragonfly 2.0|Honeybee|APT37|APT28|APT3|BRONZE BUTLER|Patchwork|Stealth Falcon|Lazarus Group|Dust Storm|Threat Group-3390|APT1|Ke3chang
|
||||
T1005,Data from Local System,Collection,Axiom|Dragonfly|FIN7|APT41|APT38|Andariel|APT29|Windigo|Fox Kitten|Sandworm Team|Operation Wocao|FIN6|Gamaredon Group|APT39|Frankenstein|Inception|Kimsuky|GALLIUM|Turla|menuPass|Dark Caracal|Dragonfly 2.0|Honeybee|APT37|APT28|APT3|BRONZE BUTLER|Patchwork|Stealth Falcon|Lazarus Group|Dust Storm|Threat Group-3390|APT1|Ke3chang
|
||||
T1003,OS Credential Dumping,Credential Access,Tonto Team|APT39|Frankenstein|APT32|APT28|Leviathan|Sowbug|Suckfly|Poseidon Group|Axiom
|
||||
T1001,Data Obfuscation,Command And Control,Operation Wocao|Axiom
|
||||
|
||||
|
+1
-1
@@ -1 +1 @@
|
||||
{"detections": [{"name": "Attempted Credential Dump From Registry via Reg exe", "id": "e9fb4a59-c5fb-440a-9f24-191fbc6b2911", "version": 6, "date": "2021-09-16", "author": "Patrick Bareiss, Splunk", "type": "TTP", "datamodel": ["Endpoint"], "description": "Monitor for execution of reg.exe with parameters specifying an export of keys that contain hashed credentials that attackers may try to crack offline.", "search": "| tstats `security_content_summariesonly` count min(_time) as firstTime max(_time) as lastTime from datamodel=Endpoint.Processes where `process_reg` OR `process_cmd` Processes.process=*save* (Processes.process=*HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\\\\Security* OR Processes.process=*HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\\\\SAM* OR Processes.process=*HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\\\\System* OR Processes.process=*HKLM\\\\Security* OR Processes.process=*HKLM\\\\System* OR Processes.process=*HKLM\\\\SAM*) by Processes.dest Processes.user Processes.parent_process Processes.process_name Processes.original_file_name Processes.process Processes.process_id Processes.parent_process_id | `drop_dm_object_name(Processes)` | `security_content_ctime(firstTime)`| `security_content_ctime(lastTime)` | `attempted_credential_dump_from_registry_via_reg_exe_filter`", "how_to_implement": "To successfully implement this search you need to be ingesting information on process that include the name of the process responsible for the changes from your endpoints into the `Endpoint` datamodel in the `Processes` node. In addition, confirm the latest CIM App 4.20 or higher is installed and the latest TA for the endpoint product.", "known_false_positives": "None identified.", "references": ["https://github.com/redcanaryco/atomic-red-team/blob/master/atomics/T1003.002/T1003.002.md#atomic-test-1---registry-dump-of-sam-creds-and-secrets"], "tags": {"name": "Attempted Credential Dump From Registry via Reg exe", "analytic_story": ["Credential Dumping", "DarkSide Ransomware"], "asset_type": "Endpoint", "automated_detection_testing": "passed", "cis20": ["CIS 3", "CIS 5", "CIS 16"], "confidence": 100, "context": ["Source:Endpoint", "Stage:Credential Access"], "dataset": ["https://media.githubusercontent.com/media/splunk/attack_data/master/datasets/attack_techniques/T1003.002/atomic_red_team/windows-sysmon.log"], "impact": 90, "kill_chain_phases": ["Actions on Objectives"], "message": "An instance of $parent_process_name$ spawning $process_name$ was identified on endpoint $dest$ by user $user$ attempting to export the registry keys.", "mitre_attack_id": ["T1003.002", "T1003"], "nist": ["DE.CM"], "observable": [{"name": "user", "type": "User", "role": ["Victim"]}, {"name": "dest", "type": "Hostname", "role": ["Victim"]}, {"name": "parent_process_name", "type": "Process", "role": ["Parent Process"]}, {"name": "process_name", "type": "Process", "role": ["Child Process"]}], "product": ["Splunk Enterprise", "Splunk Enterprise Security", "Splunk Cloud"], "required_fields": ["_time", "Processes.dest", "Processes.user", "Processes.parent_process_name", "Processes.parent_process", "Processes.original_file_name", "Processes.process_name", "Processes.process", "Processes.process_id", "Processes.parent_process_path", "Processes.process_path", "Processes.parent_process_id"], "risk_score": 90, "security_domain": "endpoint", "risk_severity": "high", "supported_tas": ["Splunk_TA_microsoft_sysmon"], "mitre_attack_enrichments": [{"mitre_attack_id": "T1003.002", "mitre_attack_technique": "Security Account Manager", "mitre_attack_tactics": ["Credential Access"], "mitre_attack_groups": ["Dragonfly", "Dragonfly 2.0", "GALLIUM", "Ke3chang", "Night Dragon", "Threat Group-3390", "Wizard Spider", "menuPass"]}, {"mitre_attack_id": "T1003", "mitre_attack_technique": "OS Credential Dumping", "mitre_attack_tactics": ["Credential Access"], "mitre_attack_groups": ["APT28", "APT32", "APT39", "Axiom", "Frankenstein", "Leviathan", "Poseidon Group", "Sowbug", "Suckfly", "Tonto Team"]}]}, "macros": [{"name": "process_reg", "definition": "(Processes.process_name=reg.exe OR Processes.original_file_name=reg.exe)", "description": "Matches the process with its original file name, data for this macro came from https://strontic.github.io/"}, {"name": "attempted_credential_dump_from_registry_via_reg_exe_filter", "definition": "search *", "description": "Update this macro to limit the output results to filter out false positives."}], "lookups": [], "cve_enrichment": [], "splunk_app_enrichment": [{"name": "Splunk Add-on for Sysmon", "url": "https://splunkbase.splunk.com/app/5709"}], "file_path": "/Users/lstella/ThreatResearch/security_content/bin/contentctl_project/contentctl_infrastructure/tests/adapter/../builder/test_data/detection/valid.yml", "source": "detection"}]}
|
||||
{"detections": [{"name": "Attempted Credential Dump From Registry via Reg exe", "id": "e9fb4a59-c5fb-440a-9f24-191fbc6b2911", "version": 6, "date": "2021-09-16", "author": "Patrick Bareiss, Splunk", "type": "TTP", "datamodel": ["Endpoint"], "description": "Monitor for execution of reg.exe with parameters specifying an export of keys that contain hashed credentials that attackers may try to crack offline.", "search": "| tstats `security_content_summariesonly` count min(_time) as firstTime max(_time) as lastTime from datamodel=Endpoint.Processes where `process_reg` OR `process_cmd` Processes.process=*save* (Processes.process=*HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\\\\Security* OR Processes.process=*HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\\\\SAM* OR Processes.process=*HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\\\\System* OR Processes.process=*HKLM\\\\Security* OR Processes.process=*HKLM\\\\System* OR Processes.process=*HKLM\\\\SAM*) by Processes.dest Processes.user Processes.parent_process Processes.process_name Processes.original_file_name Processes.process Processes.process_id Processes.parent_process_id | `drop_dm_object_name(Processes)` | `security_content_ctime(firstTime)`| `security_content_ctime(lastTime)` | `attempted_credential_dump_from_registry_via_reg_exe_filter`", "how_to_implement": "To successfully implement this search you need to be ingesting information on process that include the name of the process responsible for the changes from your endpoints into the `Endpoint` datamodel in the `Processes` node. In addition, confirm the latest CIM App 4.20 or higher is installed and the latest TA for the endpoint product.", "known_false_positives": "None identified.", "references": ["https://github.com/redcanaryco/atomic-red-team/blob/master/atomics/T1003.002/T1003.002.md#atomic-test-1---registry-dump-of-sam-creds-and-secrets"], "tags": {"name": "Attempted Credential Dump From Registry via Reg exe", "analytic_story": ["Credential Dumping", "DarkSide Ransomware"], "asset_type": "Endpoint", "automated_detection_testing": "passed", "cis20": ["CIS 3", "CIS 5", "CIS 16"], "confidence": 100, "context": ["Source:Endpoint", "Stage:Credential Access"], "dataset": ["https://media.githubusercontent.com/media/splunk/attack_data/master/datasets/attack_techniques/T1003.002/atomic_red_team/windows-sysmon.log"], "impact": 90, "kill_chain_phases": ["Actions on Objectives"], "message": "An instance of $parent_process_name$ spawning $process_name$ was identified on endpoint $dest$ by user $user$ attempting to export the registry keys.", "mitre_attack_id": ["T1003.002", "T1003"], "nist": ["DE.CM"], "observable": [{"name": "user", "type": "User", "role": ["Victim"]}, {"name": "dest", "type": "Hostname", "role": ["Victim"]}, {"name": "parent_process_name", "type": "Process", "role": ["Parent Process"]}, {"name": "process_name", "type": "Process", "role": ["Child Process"]}], "product": ["Splunk Enterprise", "Splunk Enterprise Security", "Splunk Cloud"], "required_fields": ["_time", "Processes.dest", "Processes.user", "Processes.parent_process_name", "Processes.parent_process", "Processes.original_file_name", "Processes.process_name", "Processes.process", "Processes.process_id", "Processes.parent_process_path", "Processes.process_path", "Processes.parent_process_id"], "risk_score": 90, "security_domain": "endpoint", "risk_severity": "high", "supported_tas": ["Splunk_TA_microsoft_sysmon"], "mitre_attack_enrichments": [{"mitre_attack_id": "T1003.002", "mitre_attack_technique": "Security Account Manager", "mitre_attack_tactics": ["Credential Access"], "mitre_attack_groups": ["Dragonfly", "GALLIUM", "Ke3chang", "Night Dragon", "Threat Group-3390", "Wizard Spider", "menuPass"]}, {"mitre_attack_id": "T1003", "mitre_attack_technique": "OS Credential Dumping", "mitre_attack_tactics": ["Credential Access"], "mitre_attack_groups": ["APT28", "APT32", "APT39", "Axiom", "Frankenstein", "Leviathan", "Poseidon Group", "Sowbug", "Suckfly", "Tonto Team"]}]}, "macros": [{"name": "process_reg", "definition": "(Processes.process_name=reg.exe OR Processes.original_file_name=reg.exe)", "description": "Matches the process with its original file name, data for this macro came from https://strontic.github.io/"}, {"name": "attempted_credential_dump_from_registry_via_reg_exe_filter", "definition": "search *", "description": "Update this macro to limit the output results to filter out false positives."}], "lookups": [], "cve_enrichment": [], "splunk_app_enrichment": [{"name": "Splunk Add-on for Sysmon", "url": "https://splunkbase.splunk.com/app/5709"}], "file_path": "/home/jhernandez/splunk/security_content/bin/contentctl_project/contentctl_infrastructure/tests/adapter/../builder/test_data/detection/valid.yml", "source": "detection"}]}
|
||||
+1
-1
@@ -1 +1 @@
|
||||
{"stories": [{"name": "DarkSide Ransomware", "id": "507edc74-13d5-4339-878e-b9114ded1f35", "version": 1, "date": "2021-05-12", "author": "Bhavin Patel, Splunk", "description": "Leverage searches that allow you to detect and investigate unusual activities that might relate to the DarkSide Ransomware", "narrative": "This story addresses Darkside ransomware. This ransomware payload has many similarities to common ransomware however there are certain items particular to it. The creation of a .TXT log that shows every item being encrypted as well as the creation of ransomware notes and files adding a machine ID created based on CRC32 checksum algorithm. This ransomware payload leaves machines in minimal operation level,enough to browse the attackers websites. A customized URI with leaked information is presented to each victim.This is the ransomware payload that shut down the Colonial pipeline. The story is composed of several detection searches covering similar items to other ransomware payloads and those particular to Darkside payload.", "references": ["https://www.splunk.com/en_us/blog/security/the-darkside-of-the-ransomware-pipeline.htmlbig-game-hunting-with-ryuk-another-lucrative-targeted-ransomware/", "https://www.fireeye.com/blog/threat-research/2021/05/shining-a-light-on-darkside-ransomware-operations.html"], "tags": {"name": "DarkSide Ransomware", "analytic_story": "DarkSide Ransomware", "category": ["Malware"], "product": ["Splunk Enterprise", "Splunk Enterprise Security", "Splunk Cloud"], "usecase": "Advanced Threat Detection", "mitre_attack_enrichments": [{"mitre_attack_id": "T1003.002", "mitre_attack_technique": "Security Account Manager", "mitre_attack_tactics": ["Credential Access"], "mitre_attack_groups": ["Dragonfly", "Dragonfly 2.0", "GALLIUM", "Ke3chang", "Night Dragon", "Threat Group-3390", "Wizard Spider", "menuPass"]}, {"mitre_attack_id": "T1003", "mitre_attack_technique": "OS Credential Dumping", "mitre_attack_tactics": ["Credential Access"], "mitre_attack_groups": ["APT28", "APT32", "APT39", "Axiom", "Frankenstein", "Leviathan", "Poseidon Group", "Sowbug", "Suckfly", "Tonto Team"]}], "mitre_attack_tactics": ["Credential Access"], "datamodels": ["Endpoint"], "kill_chain_phases": ["Actions on Objectives"]}, "detection_names": ["ESCU - Attempted Credential Dump From Registry via Reg exe - Rule"], "investigation_names": ["ESCU - Get Parent Process Info - Response Task"], "baseline_names": ["ESCU - Baseline Of Cloud Instances Launched"], "author_company": "Splunk", "author_name": "Bhavin Patel"}]}
|
||||
{"stories": [{"name": "DarkSide Ransomware", "id": "507edc74-13d5-4339-878e-b9114ded1f35", "version": 1, "date": "2021-05-12", "author": "Bhavin Patel, Splunk", "description": "Leverage searches that allow you to detect and investigate unusual activities that might relate to the DarkSide Ransomware", "narrative": "This story addresses Darkside ransomware. This ransomware payload has many similarities to common ransomware however there are certain items particular to it. The creation of a .TXT log that shows every item being encrypted as well as the creation of ransomware notes and files adding a machine ID created based on CRC32 checksum algorithm. This ransomware payload leaves machines in minimal operation level,enough to browse the attackers websites. A customized URI with leaked information is presented to each victim.This is the ransomware payload that shut down the Colonial pipeline. The story is composed of several detection searches covering similar items to other ransomware payloads and those particular to Darkside payload.", "references": ["https://www.splunk.com/en_us/blog/security/the-darkside-of-the-ransomware-pipeline.htmlbig-game-hunting-with-ryuk-another-lucrative-targeted-ransomware/", "https://www.fireeye.com/blog/threat-research/2021/05/shining-a-light-on-darkside-ransomware-operations.html"], "tags": {"name": "DarkSide Ransomware", "analytic_story": "DarkSide Ransomware", "category": ["Malware"], "product": ["Splunk Enterprise", "Splunk Enterprise Security", "Splunk Cloud"], "usecase": "Advanced Threat Detection", "mitre_attack_enrichments": [{"mitre_attack_id": "T1003.002", "mitre_attack_technique": "Security Account Manager", "mitre_attack_tactics": ["Credential Access"], "mitre_attack_groups": ["Dragonfly", "GALLIUM", "Ke3chang", "Night Dragon", "Threat Group-3390", "Wizard Spider", "menuPass"]}, {"mitre_attack_id": "T1003", "mitre_attack_technique": "OS Credential Dumping", "mitre_attack_tactics": ["Credential Access"], "mitre_attack_groups": ["APT28", "APT32", "APT39", "Axiom", "Frankenstein", "Leviathan", "Poseidon Group", "Sowbug", "Suckfly", "Tonto Team"]}], "mitre_attack_tactics": ["Credential Access"], "datamodels": ["Endpoint"], "kill_chain_phases": ["Actions on Objectives"]}, "detection_names": ["ESCU - Attempted Credential Dump From Registry via Reg exe - Rule"], "investigation_names": ["ESCU - Get Parent Process Info - Response Task"], "baseline_names": ["ESCU - Baseline Of Cloud Instances Launched"], "author_company": "Splunk", "author_name": "Bhavin Patel"}]}
|
||||
+6
-2
@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ This search looks for AWS CloudTrail events wherein a console login event by a u
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
</details>
|
||||
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
`cloudtrail` eventName=ConsoleLogin
|
||||
@@ -114,7 +114,8 @@ This search looks for AWS CloudTrail events wherein a console login event by a u
|
||||
#### Macros
|
||||
The SPL above uses the following Macros:
|
||||
|
||||
Note that **detect_new_user_aws_console_login_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> **detect_new_user_aws_console_login_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Required field
|
||||
* _time
|
||||
@@ -141,6 +142,9 @@ When a legitimate new user logins for the first time, this activity will be dete
|
||||
| 90.0 | 90 | 100 | tbd |
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> The Risk Score is calculated by the following formula: Risk Score = (Impact * Confidence/100). Initial Confidence and Impact is set by the analytic author.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Reference
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
+6
-2
@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ Monitor for execution of reg.exe with parameters specifying an export of keys th
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
</details>
|
||||
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -114,7 +114,8 @@ Monitor for execution of reg.exe with parameters specifying an export of keys th
|
||||
#### Macros
|
||||
The SPL above uses the following Macros:
|
||||
|
||||
Note that **attempted_credential_dump_from_registry_via_reg_exe_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> **attempted_credential_dump_from_registry_via_reg_exe_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Required field
|
||||
* _time
|
||||
@@ -151,6 +152,9 @@ None identified.
|
||||
| 90.0 | 90 | 100 | An instance of $parent_process_name$ spawning $process_name$ was identified on endpoint $dest$ by user $user$ attempting to export the registry keys. |
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> The Risk Score is calculated by the following formula: Risk Score = (Impact * Confidence/100). Initial Confidence and Impact is set by the analytic author.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Reference
|
||||
|
||||
* [https://github.com/redcanaryco/atomic-red-team/blob/master/atomics/T1003.002/T1003.002.md#atomic-test-1---registry-dump-of-sam-creds-and-secrets](https://github.com/redcanaryco/atomic-red-team/blob/master/atomics/T1003.002/T1003.002.md#atomic-test-1---registry-dump-of-sam-creds-and-secrets)
|
||||
|
||||
+6
-2
@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ This search looks for AWS CloudTrail events wherein a console login event by a u
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
</details>
|
||||
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
`cloudtrail` eventName=ConsoleLogin
|
||||
@@ -114,7 +114,8 @@ This search looks for AWS CloudTrail events wherein a console login event by a u
|
||||
#### Macros
|
||||
The SPL above uses the following Macros:
|
||||
|
||||
Note that **detect_new_user_aws_console_login_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> **detect_new_user_aws_console_login_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Required field
|
||||
* _time
|
||||
@@ -141,6 +142,9 @@ When a legitimate new user logins for the first time, this activity will be dete
|
||||
| 90.0 | 90 | 100 | tbd |
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> The Risk Score is calculated by the following formula: Risk Score = (Impact * Confidence/100). Initial Confidence and Impact is set by the analytic author.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Reference
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
+6
-2
@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ Monitor for execution of reg.exe with parameters specifying an export of keys th
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
</details>
|
||||
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -114,7 +114,8 @@ Monitor for execution of reg.exe with parameters specifying an export of keys th
|
||||
#### Macros
|
||||
The SPL above uses the following Macros:
|
||||
|
||||
Note that **attempted_credential_dump_from_registry_via_reg_exe_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> **attempted_credential_dump_from_registry_via_reg_exe_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Required field
|
||||
* _time
|
||||
@@ -151,6 +152,9 @@ None identified.
|
||||
| 90.0 | 90 | 100 | An instance of $parent_process_name$ spawning $process_name$ was identified on endpoint $dest$ by user $user$ attempting to export the registry keys. |
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> The Risk Score is calculated by the following formula: Risk Score = (Impact * Confidence/100). Initial Confidence and Impact is set by the analytic author.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Reference
|
||||
|
||||
* [https://github.com/redcanaryco/atomic-red-team/blob/master/atomics/T1003.002/T1003.002.md#atomic-test-1---registry-dump-of-sam-creds-and-secrets](https://github.com/redcanaryco/atomic-red-team/blob/master/atomics/T1003.002/T1003.002.md#atomic-test-1---registry-dump-of-sam-creds-and-secrets)
|
||||
|
||||
+1
-1
@@ -101,4 +101,4 @@ def test_md_writer():
|
||||
for file in files_to_compare:
|
||||
path = os.path.join(os.path.dirname(__file__), 'obj_to_md_data', file)
|
||||
path_ref = os.path.join(os.path.dirname(__file__), 'obj_to_md_data_ref', file)
|
||||
assert filecmp.cmp(path, path_ref, shallow=False)
|
||||
assert filecmp.cmp(path, path_ref, shallow=False)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -9,6 +9,9 @@ import timeit
|
||||
import datetime
|
||||
from typing import Union
|
||||
|
||||
DEFAULT_EVENT_HOST = "ATTACK_DATA_HOST"
|
||||
DEFAULT_DATA_INDEX = "main"
|
||||
|
||||
def enable_delete_for_admin(splunk_host:str, splunk_port:int, splunk_password:str)->bool:
|
||||
try:
|
||||
service = client.connect(
|
||||
@@ -58,7 +61,7 @@ def enable_delete_for_admin(splunk_host:str, splunk_port:int, splunk_password:st
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def get_number_of_indexed_events(splunk_host, splunk_port, splunk_password, index:str, sourcetype:Union[str,None]=None )->int:
|
||||
def get_number_of_indexed_events(splunk_host, splunk_port, splunk_password, index:str, event_host:str=DEFAULT_EVENT_HOST, sourcetype:Union[str,None]=None )->int:
|
||||
|
||||
try:
|
||||
service = client.connect(
|
||||
@@ -71,9 +74,9 @@ def get_number_of_indexed_events(splunk_host, splunk_port, splunk_password, inde
|
||||
raise(Exception("Unable to connect to Splunk instance: " + str(e)))
|
||||
|
||||
if sourcetype is not None:
|
||||
search = '''search index="%s" sourcetype="%s" | stats count'''%(index,sourcetype)
|
||||
search = f'''search index="{index}" sourcetype="{sourcetype}" host="{event_host}" | stats count'''
|
||||
else:
|
||||
search = '''search index="%s" | stats count'''%(index)
|
||||
search = f'''search index="{index}" host="{event_host}" | stats count'''
|
||||
kwargs = {"exec_mode":"blocking"}
|
||||
try:
|
||||
search_result = service.jobs.create(search, **kwargs)
|
||||
@@ -94,7 +97,6 @@ def get_number_of_indexed_events(splunk_host, splunk_port, splunk_password, inde
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def wait_for_indexing_to_complete(splunk_host, splunk_port, splunk_password, sourcetype:str, index:str, check_interval_seconds:int=10)->bool:
|
||||
|
||||
startTime = timeit.default_timer()
|
||||
previous_count = -1
|
||||
time.sleep(check_interval_seconds)
|
||||
@@ -300,7 +302,7 @@ def test_detection_search(splunk_host:str, splunk_port:int, splunk_password:str,
|
||||
return test_results
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def delete_attack_data(splunk_host:str, splunk_password:str, splunk_port:int, wait_on_delete:Union[dict,None], search_string:str, detection_filename:str, index:str="main")->bool:
|
||||
def delete_attack_data(splunk_host:str, splunk_password:str, splunk_port:int, wait_on_delete:Union[dict,None], search_string:str, detection_filename:str, indices:list[str]=[DEFAULT_DATA_INDEX], host:str=DEFAULT_EVENT_HOST)->bool:
|
||||
|
||||
try:
|
||||
service = client.connect(
|
||||
@@ -324,47 +326,48 @@ def delete_attack_data(splunk_host:str, splunk_password:str, splunk_port:int, wa
|
||||
data_exists = True
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
#print(f"Deleting data for {detection_filename}: {indices}")
|
||||
for index in indices:
|
||||
while (get_number_of_indexed_events(splunk_host, splunk_port, splunk_password, index=index, event_host=host) != 0) :
|
||||
splunk_search = f'search index="{index}" host="{host}" | delete'
|
||||
|
||||
while (get_number_of_indexed_events(splunk_host, splunk_port, splunk_password, index=index) != 0) :
|
||||
splunk_search = f'search index={index} | delete'
|
||||
kwargs = {
|
||||
"exec_mode": "blocking",
|
||||
"dispatch.earliest_time": "-1d",
|
||||
"dispatch.latest_time": "now"}
|
||||
try:
|
||||
|
||||
job = service.jobs.create(splunk_search, **kwargs)
|
||||
reader = results.ResultsReader(job)
|
||||
|
||||
kwargs = {
|
||||
"exec_mode": "blocking",
|
||||
"dispatch.earliest_time": "-1d",
|
||||
"dispatch.latest_time": "now"}
|
||||
try:
|
||||
|
||||
job = service.jobs.create(splunk_search, **kwargs)
|
||||
reader = results.ResultsReader(job)
|
||||
|
||||
'''
|
||||
error_in_results = False
|
||||
for result in reader:
|
||||
if hasattr(result,"message") and hasattr(result,"type") and ("You have insufficient privileges to delete events" in result.message or result.type == "FATAL"):
|
||||
print("Delete is not enabled for admin: [%s] - enabling delete and trying to delete again..."%(result.message), file=sys.stderr)
|
||||
if already_enabled_delete is True:
|
||||
print("We already enabled delete, but the setting did not take effect.")
|
||||
raise(Exception("Enabling delete command failed to take effect"))
|
||||
if enable_delete_for_admin(splunk_host, splunk_port,splunk_password) != True:
|
||||
raise(Exception("Failure enabling delete for admin. We cannot continue"))
|
||||
# We enabled delete, so now we will try to delete again
|
||||
already_enabled_delete = True
|
||||
break
|
||||
else:
|
||||
#This is not one of the error messages, do nothing
|
||||
pass
|
||||
'''
|
||||
#No need to issue Delete command again, we will now break out of the loop
|
||||
#if error_in_results is False:
|
||||
# data_exists = False
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
'''
|
||||
error_in_results = False
|
||||
for result in reader:
|
||||
if hasattr(result,"message") and hasattr(result,"type") and ("You have insufficient privileges to delete events" in result.message or result.type == "FATAL"):
|
||||
print("Delete is not enabled for admin: [%s] - enabling delete and trying to delete again..."%(result.message), file=sys.stderr)
|
||||
if already_enabled_delete is True:
|
||||
print("We already enabled delete, but the setting did not take effect.")
|
||||
raise(Exception("Enabling delete command failed to take effect"))
|
||||
if enable_delete_for_admin(splunk_host, splunk_port,splunk_password) != True:
|
||||
raise(Exception("Failure enabling delete for admin. We cannot continue"))
|
||||
# We enabled delete, so now we will try to delete again
|
||||
already_enabled_delete = True
|
||||
break
|
||||
else:
|
||||
#This is not one of the error messages, do nothing
|
||||
pass
|
||||
'''
|
||||
#No need to issue Delete command again, we will now break out of the loop
|
||||
#if error_in_results is False:
|
||||
# data_exists = False
|
||||
#Otherwise, we will loop again
|
||||
|
||||
#Otherwise, we will loop again
|
||||
|
||||
except Exception as e:
|
||||
print(f"Trouble deleting data from a run.... we will try again: {str(e)}")
|
||||
time.sleep(5)
|
||||
#raise(Exception("Unable to delete data from a run: " + str(e)))
|
||||
except Exception as e:
|
||||
print(f"Trouble deleting data from a run.... we will try again: {str(e)}")
|
||||
time.sleep(5)
|
||||
#raise(Exception("Unable to delete data from a run: " + str(e)))
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
return True
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -11,19 +11,21 @@ import requests
|
||||
from modules.DataManipulation import DataManipulation
|
||||
from modules import splunk_sdk
|
||||
import timeit
|
||||
from typing import Union
|
||||
from typing import Union, Tuple
|
||||
from os.path import relpath
|
||||
from tempfile import mkdtemp
|
||||
import datetime
|
||||
import http.client
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_detection_wrapper(container_name:str, splunk_ip:str, splunk_password:str, splunk_port:int,
|
||||
test_file:str, attack_data_root_folder, wait_on_failure:bool=False, wait_on_completion:bool=False)->dict:
|
||||
|
||||
one_test_start = timeit.default_timer()
|
||||
uuid_var = str(uuid.uuid4())
|
||||
result_test = test_detection(splunk_ip, splunk_port, container_name, splunk_password, test_file, uuid_var, attack_data_root_folder)
|
||||
result_test, indices_to_delete = test_detection(splunk_ip, splunk_port, container_name, splunk_password, test_file, uuid_var, attack_data_root_folder)
|
||||
one_test_stop = timeit.default_timer()
|
||||
|
||||
if result_test is None:
|
||||
@@ -45,8 +47,9 @@ def test_detection_wrapper(container_name:str, splunk_ip:str, splunk_password:st
|
||||
wait_on_delete = {'message':"\n\n\n****SEARCH SUCCESS : Allowing time to examine search/data****"}
|
||||
else:
|
||||
wait_on_delete = None
|
||||
|
||||
splunk_sdk.delete_attack_data(splunk_ip, splunk_password, splunk_port, wait_on_delete, search_string, test_file)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
splunk_sdk.delete_attack_data(splunk_ip, splunk_password, splunk_port, wait_on_delete, search_string, test_file, indices = indices_to_delete)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
return result_test
|
||||
@@ -66,7 +69,7 @@ def get_service(splunk_ip:str, splunk_port:int, splunk_password:str):
|
||||
raise(Exception("Unable to connect to Splunk instance: " + str(e)))
|
||||
return service
|
||||
|
||||
def test_detection(splunk_ip:str, splunk_port:int, container_name:str, splunk_password:str, test_file:str, uuid_var, attack_data_root_folder)->Union[dict,None]:
|
||||
def test_detection(splunk_ip:str, splunk_port:int, container_name:str, splunk_password:str, test_file:str, uuid_var, attack_data_root_folder)->Tuple[Union[dict,None], set[str]]:
|
||||
|
||||
test_file_obj = load_file(os.path.join("security_content/", test_file))
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -89,9 +92,18 @@ def test_detection(splunk_ip:str, splunk_port:int, container_name:str, splunk_pa
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
indices_to_delete = set()
|
||||
for attack_data in test_file_obj['tests'][0]['attack_data']:
|
||||
url = attack_data['data']
|
||||
|
||||
if 'custom_index' in attack_data:
|
||||
print(f"Found a custom index for {test_file}: {attack_data['custom_index']}")
|
||||
data_upload_index = attack_data['custom_index']
|
||||
else:
|
||||
data_upload_index = splunk_sdk.DEFAULT_DATA_INDEX
|
||||
|
||||
indices_to_delete.add(data_upload_index)
|
||||
|
||||
r = requests.get(url, allow_redirects=True)
|
||||
target_file = os.path.join(folder_name, attack_data['file_name'])
|
||||
with open(target_file, 'wb') as target:
|
||||
@@ -108,7 +120,7 @@ def test_detection(splunk_ip:str, splunk_port:int, container_name:str, splunk_pa
|
||||
|
||||
try:
|
||||
service = get_service(splunk_ip, splunk_port, splunk_password)
|
||||
test_index = service.indexes["main"]
|
||||
test_index = service.indexes[data_upload_index]
|
||||
|
||||
with open(target_file, 'rb') as target:
|
||||
test_index.submit(target.read(), sourcetype=attack_data['sourcetype'], source=attack_data['source'])
|
||||
@@ -122,7 +134,7 @@ def test_detection(splunk_ip:str, splunk_port:int, container_name:str, splunk_pa
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
if not splunk_sdk.wait_for_indexing_to_complete(splunk_ip, splunk_port, splunk_password, attack_data['sourcetype'], "main"):
|
||||
if not splunk_sdk.wait_for_indexing_to_complete(splunk_ip, splunk_port, splunk_password, attack_data['sourcetype'], data_upload_index):
|
||||
raise Exception("There was an error waiting for indexing to complete.")
|
||||
|
||||
#Allow some time for the data to be ingested and processed
|
||||
@@ -169,7 +181,7 @@ def test_detection(splunk_ip:str, splunk_port:int, container_name:str, splunk_pa
|
||||
result_test['attack_data_directory'] = abs_folder_path
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
return result_test
|
||||
return result_test, indices_to_delete
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def load_file(file_path):
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -13,6 +13,6 @@
|
||||
<rect rx="3" width="105" height="20" fill="url(#a)"/>
|
||||
<g fill="#fff" text-anchor="middle" font-family="DejaVu Sans,Verdana,Geneva,sans-serif" font-size="11">
|
||||
<text x="30" y="14">detections</text>
|
||||
<text x="83" y="14">790</text>
|
||||
<text x="83" y="14">806</text>
|
||||
</g>
|
||||
</svg>
|
||||
|
Before Width: | Height: | Size: 654 B After Width: | Height: | Size: 654 B |
@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
|
||||
name: Splunk Command and Scripting Interpreter Delete Usage
|
||||
id: 8d3d5d5e-ca43-42be-aa1f-bc64375f6b04
|
||||
version: 1
|
||||
date: '2022-05-27'
|
||||
author: Michael Haag, Splunk
|
||||
type: Anomaly
|
||||
datamodel:
|
||||
- Splunk_Audit
|
||||
description: The following analytic identifies the use of the risky command - Delete - that may be utilized in Splunk to delete some or all data queried for. In order to use Delete in Splunk, one must be assigned the role. This is typically not used and should generate an anomaly if it is used.
|
||||
search: '| tstats `security_content_summariesonly` count min(_time) as firstTime max(_time) as lastTime from datamodel=Splunk_Audit.Search_Activity where Search_Activity.search IN ("*| delete*") Search_Activity.search_type=adhoc Search_Activity.user!=splunk-system-user
|
||||
by Search_Activity.search Search_Activity.info Search_Activity.total_run_time Search_Activity.user Search_Activity.search_type
|
||||
| `drop_dm_object_name(Search_Activity)`
|
||||
| `security_content_ctime(firstTime)`
|
||||
| `security_content_ctime(lastTime)`
|
||||
| `splunk_command_and_scripting_interpreter_delete_usage_filter`'
|
||||
how_to_implement: To successfully implement this search acceleration is recommended against the Search_Activity datamodel that runs against the splunk _audit index. In addition, this analytic requires the Common Information Model App which includes the Splunk Audit Datamodel https://splunkbase.splunk.com/app/1621/.
|
||||
known_false_positives: False positives may be present if this command is used as a common practice. Filter as needed.
|
||||
references:
|
||||
- https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/latest/Security/SPLsafeguards#Commands_that_trigger_the_warning
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
analytic_story:
|
||||
- Splunk Vulnerabilities
|
||||
asset_type: Web Server
|
||||
cis20:
|
||||
- CIS 3
|
||||
- CIS 5
|
||||
- CIS 16
|
||||
cve:
|
||||
- CVE-2022-32154
|
||||
confidence: 30
|
||||
context:
|
||||
- Source:Endpoint
|
||||
dataset:
|
||||
- https://media.githubusercontent.com/media/splunk/attack_data/master/datasets/attack_techniques/T1213/audittrail/audittrail.log
|
||||
impact: 90
|
||||
kill_chain_phases:
|
||||
- Actions on Objectives
|
||||
message: $user$ executed the 'delete' command, if this is unexpected it should be reviewed.
|
||||
mitre_attack_id:
|
||||
- T1059
|
||||
nist:
|
||||
- DE.CM
|
||||
observable:
|
||||
- name: user
|
||||
type: User
|
||||
role:
|
||||
- Victim
|
||||
product:
|
||||
- Splunk Enterprise
|
||||
- Splunk Enterprise Security
|
||||
- Splunk Cloud
|
||||
required_fields:
|
||||
- _time
|
||||
- Search_Activity.search
|
||||
- Search_Activity.info
|
||||
- Search_Activity.total_run_time
|
||||
- Search_Activity.user
|
||||
- Search_Activity.savedsearch_name
|
||||
- Search_Activity.search_type
|
||||
risk_score: 27
|
||||
security_domain: audit
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
|
||||
name: Splunk Command and Scripting Interpreter Risky Commands
|
||||
id: 1cf58ae1-9177-40b8-a26c-8966040f11ae
|
||||
version: 1
|
||||
date: '2022-05-23'
|
||||
author: Michael Haag, Splunk
|
||||
type: Hunting
|
||||
datamodel:
|
||||
- Splunk_Audit
|
||||
description: 'The Splunk platform contains built-in search processing language (SPL) safeguards to warn you when you are about to unknowingly run a search that contains commands that might be a security risk. This warning appears when you click a link or type a URL that loads a search that contains risky commands. The warning does not appear when you create ad hoc searches. This warning alerts you to the possibility of unauthorized actions by a malicious user. Unauthorized actions include -
|
||||
Copying or transferring data (data exfiltration), Deleting data and Overwriting data. All risky commands may be found here https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/latest/Security/SPLsafeguards#Commands_that_trigger_the_warninga.
|
||||
A possible scenario when this might occur is when a malicious actor creates a search that includes commands that exfiltrate or damage data. The malicious actor then sends an unsuspecting user a link to the search. The URL contains a query string (q) and a search identifier (sid), but the sid is not valid. The malicious actor hopes the user will use the link and the search will run.
|
||||
During analysis, pivot based on user name and filter any user or queries not needed. Queries ran from a dashboard are seen as adhoc queries. When a query runs from a dashboard it will not show in audittrail logs the source dashboard name. The query defaults to adhoc and no Splunk system user activity.
|
||||
In addition, modify this query by removing key commands that generate too much noise, or too little, and create separate queries with higher confidence to alert on.'
|
||||
search: '| tstats `security_content_summariesonly` count min(_time) as firstTime max(_time) as lastTime from datamodel=Splunk_Audit.Search_Activity where Search_Activity.search IN ("*| runshellscript *", "*| collect *","*| delete *", "*| fit *", "*| outputcsv *", "*| outputlookup *", "*| run *", "*| script *", "*| sendalert *", "*| sendemail *", "*| tscolle*") Search_Activity.search_type=adhoc Search_Activity.user!=splunk-system-user
|
||||
by Search_Activity.search Search_Activity.info Search_Activity.total_run_time Search_Activity.user Search_Activity.search_type
|
||||
| `drop_dm_object_name(Search_Activity)`
|
||||
| `security_content_ctime(firstTime)`
|
||||
| `security_content_ctime(lastTime)`
|
||||
| `splunk_command_and_scripting_interpreter_risky_commands_filter`'
|
||||
how_to_implement: To successfully implement this search acceleration is recommended against the Search_Activity datamodel that runs against the splunk _audit index. In addition, this analytic requires the Common Information Model App which includes the Splunk Audit Datamodel https://splunkbase.splunk.com/app/1621/. Splunk SOAR customers can find a SOAR workbook that walks an analyst through the process of running these hunting searches in the references list of this detection. In order to use this workbook, a user will need to run a curl command to post the file to their SOAR instance such as "curl -u username:password https://soar.instance.name/rest/rest/workbook_template -d @splunk_psa_0622.json". A user should then create an empty container or case, attach the workbook, and begin working through the tasks.
|
||||
known_false_positives: False positives will be present until properly filtered by Username and search name.
|
||||
references:
|
||||
- https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/latest/Security/SPLsafeguards#Commands_that_trigger_the_warning
|
||||
- https://www.github.com/splunk/security_content/blob/develop/workbooks/splunk_psa_0622.json
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
analytic_story:
|
||||
- Splunk Vulnerabilities
|
||||
asset_type: Web Server
|
||||
cis20:
|
||||
- CIS 3
|
||||
- CIS 5
|
||||
- CIS 16
|
||||
confidence: 40
|
||||
cve:
|
||||
- CVE-2022-32154
|
||||
context:
|
||||
- Source:Endpoint
|
||||
dataset:
|
||||
- https://media.githubusercontent.com/media/splunk/attack_data/master/datasets/attack_techniques/T1213/audittrail/audittrail.log
|
||||
impact: 50
|
||||
kill_chain_phases:
|
||||
- Actions on Objectives
|
||||
message: A risky Splunk command has ran by $user$ and should be reviewed.
|
||||
mitre_attack_id:
|
||||
- T1059
|
||||
nist:
|
||||
- DE.CM
|
||||
observable:
|
||||
- name: user
|
||||
type: User
|
||||
role:
|
||||
- Victim
|
||||
product:
|
||||
- Splunk Enterprise
|
||||
- Splunk Enterprise Security
|
||||
- Splunk Cloud
|
||||
required_fields:
|
||||
- _time
|
||||
- Search_Activity.search
|
||||
- Search_Activity.info
|
||||
- Search_Activity.total_run_time
|
||||
- Search_Activity.user
|
||||
- Search_Activity.savedsearch_name
|
||||
- Search_Activity.search_type
|
||||
risk_score: 20
|
||||
security_domain: audit
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
|
||||
name: Splunk Command and Scripting Interpreter Risky SPL MLTK
|
||||
id: 19d0146c-2eae-4e53-8d39-1198a78fa9ca
|
||||
version: 1
|
||||
date: '2022-05-27'
|
||||
author: Abhinav Mishra, Kumar Sharad and Xiao Lin, Splunk
|
||||
type: Anomaly
|
||||
datamodel:
|
||||
- Splunk_Audit
|
||||
description: 'This detection utilizes machine learning model named "risky_command_abuse" trained from "Splunk Command
|
||||
and Scripting Interpreter Risky SPL MLTK Baseline". It should be scheduled to run hourly to detect whether a user
|
||||
has run searches containing risky SPL from this list
|
||||
https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/latest/Security/SPLsafeguards#Commands_that_trigger_the_warninga
|
||||
with abnormally long running time in the past one hour, comparing with his/her past seven days history. This search
|
||||
uses the trained baseline to infer whether a search is an outlier (isOutlier ~= 1.0) or not (isOutlier~= 0.0)'
|
||||
search: '| tstats sum(Search_Activity.total_run_time) AS run_time,
|
||||
values(Search_Activity.search) as searches, count
|
||||
FROM datamodel=Splunk_Audit.Search_Activity WHERE (Search_Activity.user!="")
|
||||
AND (Search_Activity.total_run_time>1) AND (earliest=-1h@h latest=now)
|
||||
AND (Search_Activity.search IN ("*| runshellscript *", "*| collect *","*| delete *", "*| fit *", "*| outputcsv *",
|
||||
"*| outputlookup *", "*| run *", "*| script *", "*| sendalert *", "*| sendemail *", "*| tscolle*"))
|
||||
AND (Search_Activity.search_type=adhoc) AND (Search_Activity.user!=splunk-system-user)
|
||||
BY _time, Search_Activity.user span=1h
|
||||
| apply risky_command_abuse
|
||||
| fields _time, Search_Activity.user, searches, run_time, IsOutlier(run_time)
|
||||
| rename IsOutlier(run_time) as isOutlier, _time as timestamp
|
||||
| where isOutlier>0.5
|
||||
| `splunk_command_and_scripting_interpreter_risky_spl_mltk_filter`'
|
||||
how_to_implement: This detection depends on MLTK app which can be found here - https://splunkbase.splunk.com/app/2890/
|
||||
and the Splunk Audit datamodel which can be found here - https://splunkbase.splunk.com/app/1621/. Baseline model
|
||||
needs to be built using "Splunk Command and Scripting Interpreter Risky SPL MLTK Baseline" before this search can run.
|
||||
Please note that the current search only finds matches exactly one space between separator bar and risky commands.
|
||||
known_false_positives: If the run time of a search exceeds the boundaries of outlier defined by the fitted density
|
||||
function model, false positives can occur, incorrectly labeling a long running search as potentially risky.
|
||||
references:
|
||||
- https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/latest/Security/SPLsafeguards#Commands_that_trigger_the_warning
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
analytic_story:
|
||||
- Splunk Vulnerabilities
|
||||
asset_type: Web Server
|
||||
cis20:
|
||||
- CIS 3
|
||||
- CIS 6
|
||||
confidence: 40
|
||||
cve:
|
||||
- CVE-2022-32154
|
||||
context:
|
||||
- Source:Endpoint
|
||||
dataset:
|
||||
- https://github.com/splunk/attack_data/raw/master/datasets/attack_techniques/T1203/search_activity.txt
|
||||
impact: 50
|
||||
kill_chain_phases:
|
||||
- Actions on Objectives
|
||||
message: Abnormally long run time for risk SPL command seen by user $(Search_Activity.user).
|
||||
mitre_attack_id:
|
||||
- T1059
|
||||
nist:
|
||||
- DE.AE
|
||||
observable:
|
||||
- name: user
|
||||
type: User
|
||||
role:
|
||||
- Victim
|
||||
product:
|
||||
- Splunk Enterprise
|
||||
- Splunk Enterprise Security
|
||||
- Splunk Cloud
|
||||
required_fields:
|
||||
- _time
|
||||
- Search_Activity.search
|
||||
- Search_Activity.total_run_time
|
||||
- Search_Activity.user
|
||||
- Search_Activity.search_type
|
||||
risk_score: 20
|
||||
security_domain: audit
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
|
||||
name: Splunk Digital Certificates Infrastructure Version
|
||||
id: 3c162281-7edb-4ebc-b9a4-5087aaf28fa7
|
||||
version: 1
|
||||
date: '2022-05-26'
|
||||
author: Lou Stella, Splunk
|
||||
type: Hunting
|
||||
datamodel: []
|
||||
description: This search will check the TLS validation is properly configured on the search head it is run from as well as its search peers after Splunk version 9. Other components such as additional search heads or anything this rest command cannot be distributed to will need to be manually checked.
|
||||
search: '| rest /services/server/info | table splunk_server version server_roles | join splunk_server [| rest /servicesNS/nobody/search/configs/conf-server/ search="sslConfig"| table splunk_server sslVerifyServerCert sslVerifyServerName serverCert] | fillnull value="Not Set" | rename sslVerifyServerCert as "Server.conf:SslConfig:sslVerifyServerCert", sslVerifyServerName as "Server.conf:SslConfig:sslVerifyServerName", serverCert as "Server.conf:SslConfig:serverCert" | `splunk_digital_certificates_infrastructure_version_filter`'
|
||||
how_to_implement: The user running this search is required to have a permission allowing them to dispatch REST requests to indexers (the `dispatch_rest_to_indexers` capability) in some architectures. Splunk SOAR customers can find a SOAR workbook that walks an analyst through the process of running these hunting searches in the references list of this detection. In order to use this workbook, a user will need to run a curl command to post the file to their SOAR instance such as "curl -u username:password https://soar.instance.name/rest/rest/workbook_template -d @splunk_psa_0622.json". A user should then create an empty container or case, attach the workbook, and begin working through the tasks.
|
||||
known_false_positives: No known at this time.
|
||||
references:
|
||||
- https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/9.0.0/Security/EnableTLSCertHostnameValidation#Configure_TLS_host_name_validation_for_Splunk-to-Splunk_communication
|
||||
- https://www.splunk.com/en_us/product-security/announcements/svd-2022-0602.html
|
||||
- https://www.github.com/splunk/security_content/blob/develop/workbooks/splunk_psa_0622.json
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
analytic_story:
|
||||
- Splunk Vulnerabilities
|
||||
asset_type: Endpoint
|
||||
cis20:
|
||||
- CIS 3
|
||||
- CIS 5
|
||||
- CIS 16
|
||||
cve:
|
||||
- CVE-2022-32153
|
||||
confidence: 100
|
||||
context:
|
||||
- Source:Endpoint
|
||||
dataset:
|
||||
- https://media.githubusercontent.com/media/splunk/attack_data/master/datasets/attack_techniques/T1213/audittrail/audittrail.log
|
||||
impact: 50
|
||||
kill_chain_phases:
|
||||
- Exploitation
|
||||
message: $splunk_server$ may not be properly validating TLS Certificates
|
||||
mitre_attack_id:
|
||||
- T1587.003
|
||||
nist:
|
||||
- DE.CM
|
||||
observable:
|
||||
- name: splunk_server
|
||||
type: Hostname
|
||||
role:
|
||||
- Victim
|
||||
product:
|
||||
- Splunk Enterprise
|
||||
- Splunk Enterprise Security
|
||||
- Splunk Cloud
|
||||
required_fields:
|
||||
- none
|
||||
risk_score: 50
|
||||
security_domain: threat
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
|
||||
name: Splunk Digital Certificates Lack of Encryption
|
||||
id: 386a7ebc-737b-48cf-9ca8-5405459ed508
|
||||
version: 1
|
||||
date: '2022-05-26'
|
||||
author: Lou Stella, Splunk
|
||||
type: Anomaly
|
||||
datamodel: []
|
||||
description: On June 14th, 2022, Splunk released a security advisory relating to the authentication that happens between Universal Forwarders and Deployment Servers. In some circumstances, an unauthenticated client can download forwarder bundles from the Deployment Server. In other circumstances, a client may be allowed to publish a forwarder bundle to other clients, which may allow for arbitrary code execution. The fixes for these require upgrading to at least Splunk 9.0 on the forwarder as well. This is a great opportunity to configure TLS across the environment. This search looks for forwarders that are not using TLS and adds risk to those entities.
|
||||
search: '`splunkd` group="tcpin_connections" ssl="false" | stats values(sourceIp) latest(fwdType) latest(version) by hostname | `splunk_digital_certificates_lack_of_encryption_filter`'
|
||||
how_to_implement: This anomaly search looks for forwarder connections that are not currently using TLS. It then presents the source IP, the type of forwarder, and the version of the forwarder. You can also remove the "ssl=false" argument from the initial stanza in order to get a full list of all your forwarders that are sending data, and the version of Splunk software they are running, for audit purposes. Splunk SOAR customers can find a SOAR workbook that walks an analyst through the process of running these hunting searches in the references list of this detection. In order to use this workbook, a user will need to run a curl command to post the file to their SOAR instance such as "curl -u username:password https://soar.instance.name/rest/rest/workbook_template -d @splunk_psa_0622.json". A user should then create an empty container or case, attach the workbook, and begin working through the tasks.
|
||||
known_false_positives: None at this time
|
||||
references:
|
||||
- https://www.splunk.com/en_us/product-security/announcements/svd-2022-0607.html
|
||||
- https://www.splunk.com/en_us/product-security/announcements/svd-2022-0601.html
|
||||
- https://www.github.com/splunk/security_content/blob/develop/workbooks/splunk_psa_0622.json
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
analytic_story:
|
||||
- Splunk Vulnerabilities
|
||||
asset_type: endpoint
|
||||
cis20:
|
||||
- CIS 3
|
||||
- CIS 5
|
||||
- CIS 16
|
||||
cve:
|
||||
- CVE-2022-32151
|
||||
confidence: 80
|
||||
context:
|
||||
- Source:Endpoint
|
||||
dataset:
|
||||
- https://media.githubusercontent.com/media/splunk/attack_data/master/datasets/attack_techniques/T1587.003/splunk_fwder/splunkd.log
|
||||
impact: 25
|
||||
kill_chain_phases:
|
||||
- Exploitation
|
||||
message: $hostname$ is not using TLS when forwarding data
|
||||
mitre_attack_id:
|
||||
- T1587.003
|
||||
nist:
|
||||
- DE.CM
|
||||
observable:
|
||||
- name: hostname
|
||||
type: Hostname
|
||||
role:
|
||||
- Victim
|
||||
product:
|
||||
- Splunk Enterprise
|
||||
- Splunk Enterprise Security
|
||||
- Splunk Cloud
|
||||
required_fields:
|
||||
- group
|
||||
- ssl
|
||||
- sourceIp
|
||||
- fwdType
|
||||
- version
|
||||
- hostname
|
||||
risk_score: 20
|
||||
security_domain: threat
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,54 @@
|
||||
name: Splunk Process Injection Forwarder Bundle Downloads
|
||||
id: 8ea57d78-1aac-45d2-a913-0cd603fb6e9e
|
||||
version: 1
|
||||
date: '2022-05-26'
|
||||
author: Lou Stella, Splunk
|
||||
type: Hunting
|
||||
datamodel: []
|
||||
description: On June 14th, 2022, Splunk released a security advisory relating to the authentication that happens between Universal Forwarders and Deployment Servers. In some circumstances, an unauthenticated client can download forwarder bundles from the Deployment Server. This hunting search pulls a full list of forwarder bundle downloads where the peer column is the forwarder, the host column is the Deployment Server, and then you have a list of the apps downloaded and the serverclasses in which the peer is a member of. You should look for apps or clients that you do not recognize as being part of your environment.
|
||||
search: '`splunkd` component="PackageDownloadRestHandler" | stats values(app) values(serverclass) by peer, host | `splunk_process_injection_forwarder_bundle_downloads_filter`'
|
||||
how_to_implement: This hunting search uses native logs produced when a deployment server is within your environment. Splunk SOAR customers can find a SOAR workbook that walks an analyst through the process of running these hunting searches in the references list of this detection. In order to use this workbook, a user will need to run a curl command to post the file to their SOAR instance such as "curl -u username:password https://soar.instance.name/rest/rest/workbook_template -d @splunk_psa_0622.json". A user should then create an empty container or case, attach the workbook, and begin working through the tasks.
|
||||
known_false_positives: None at this time.
|
||||
references:
|
||||
- https://www.splunk.com/en_us/product-security/announcements/svd-2022-0607.html
|
||||
- https://www.github.com/splunk/security_content/blob/develop/workbooks/splunk_psa_0622.json
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
analytic_story:
|
||||
- Splunk Vulnerabilities
|
||||
asset_type: Endpoint
|
||||
cis20:
|
||||
- CIS 3
|
||||
- CIS 5
|
||||
- CIS 16
|
||||
cve:
|
||||
- CVE-2022-32157
|
||||
confidence: 70
|
||||
context:
|
||||
- Source:Endpoint
|
||||
dataset:
|
||||
- https://media.githubusercontent.com/media/splunk/attack_data/master/datasets/attack_techniques/T1055/splunk_ds/splunkd.log
|
||||
impact: 50
|
||||
kill_chain_phases:
|
||||
- Exploitation
|
||||
message: $peer$ downloaded apps from $host$
|
||||
mitre_attack_id:
|
||||
- T1055
|
||||
nist:
|
||||
- DE.CM
|
||||
observable:
|
||||
- name: host
|
||||
type: Hostname
|
||||
role:
|
||||
- Victim
|
||||
product:
|
||||
- Splunk Enterprise
|
||||
- Splunk Enterprise Security
|
||||
- Splunk Cloud
|
||||
required_fields:
|
||||
- component
|
||||
- app
|
||||
- serverclass
|
||||
- peer
|
||||
- host
|
||||
risk_score: 35
|
||||
security_domain: threat
|
||||
+51
@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
|
||||
name: Splunk Protocol Impersonation Weak Encryption Configuration
|
||||
id: 900892bf-70a9-4787-8c99-546dd98ce461
|
||||
version: 1
|
||||
date: '2022-05-25'
|
||||
author: Lou Stella, Splunk
|
||||
type: Hunting
|
||||
datamodel: []
|
||||
description: On June 14th, 2022, Splunk released a security advisory relating to TLS validation occuring within the httplib and urllib python libraries shipped with Splunk. In addition to upgrading to Splunk Enterprise 9.0 or later, several configuration settings need to be set. This search will check those configurations on the search head it is run from as well as its search peers. In addition to these settings, the PYTHONHTTPSVERIFY setting in $SPLUNK_HOME/etc/splunk-launch.conf needs to be enabled as well. Other components such as additional search heads or anything this rest command cannot be distributed to will need to be manually checked.
|
||||
search: '| rest /services/server/info | table splunk_server version server_roles | join splunk_server [| rest /servicesNS/nobody/search/configs/conf-server/ search="PythonSslClientConfig" | table splunk_server sslVerifyServerCert sslVerifyServerName] | join splunk_server [| rest /servicesNS/nobody/search/configs/conf-web/settings | table splunk_server serverCert sslVersions] | rename sslVerifyServerCert as "Server.conf:PythonSSLClientConfig:sslVerifyServerCert", sslVerifyServerName as "Server.conf:PythonSSLClientConfig:sslVerifyServerName", serverCert as "Web.conf:Settings:serverCert", sslVersions as "Web.conf:Settings:sslVersions" | `splunk_protocol_impersonation_weak_encryption_configuration_filter`'
|
||||
how_to_implement: The user running this search is required to have a permission allowing them to dispatch REST requests to indexers (The `dispatch_rest_to_indexers` capability). Splunk SOAR customers can find a SOAR workbook that walks an analyst through the process of running these hunting searches in the references list of this detection. In order to use this workbook, a user will need to run a curl command to post the file to their SOAR instance such as "curl -u username:password https://soar.instance.name/rest/rest/workbook_template -d @splunk_psa_0622.json". A user should then create an empty container or case, attach the workbook, and begin working through the tasks.
|
||||
known_false_positives: While all of the settings on each device returned by this search may appear to be hardened, you will still need to verify the value of PYTHONHTTPSVERIFY in $SPLUNK_HOME/etc/splunk-launch.conf on each device in order to harden the python configuration.
|
||||
references:
|
||||
- https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/9.0.0/Security/EnableTLSCertHostnameValidation
|
||||
- https://www.splunk.com/en_us/product-security/announcements/svd-2022-0601.html
|
||||
- https://www.github.com/splunk/security_content/blob/develop/workbooks/splunk_psa_0622.json
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
analytic_story:
|
||||
- Splunk Vulnerabilities
|
||||
asset_type: Endpoint
|
||||
cis20:
|
||||
- CIS 3
|
||||
- CIS 5
|
||||
- CIS 16
|
||||
cve:
|
||||
- CVE-2022-32151
|
||||
confidence: 100
|
||||
context:
|
||||
- Source:Endpoint
|
||||
dataset:
|
||||
- https://media.githubusercontent.com/media/splunk/attack_data/master/datasets/attack_techniques/T1213/audittrail/audittrail.log
|
||||
impact: 50
|
||||
kill_chain_phases:
|
||||
- Exploitation
|
||||
message: $splunk_server$ may not be properly validating TLS Certificates
|
||||
mitre_attack_id:
|
||||
- T1001.003
|
||||
nist:
|
||||
- DE.CM
|
||||
observable:
|
||||
- name: splunk_server
|
||||
type: Hostname
|
||||
role:
|
||||
- Victim
|
||||
product:
|
||||
- Splunk Enterprise
|
||||
- Splunk Enterprise Security
|
||||
- Splunk Cloud
|
||||
required_fields:
|
||||
- none
|
||||
risk_score: 50
|
||||
security_domain: threat
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
|
||||
name: Splunk protocol impersonation weak encryption selfsigned
|
||||
id: c76c7a2e-df49-414a-bb36-dce2683770de
|
||||
version: 1
|
||||
date: '2022-05-26'
|
||||
author: Rod Soto, Splunk
|
||||
type: Hunting
|
||||
datamodel: []
|
||||
search: '`splunkd` certificate event_message="X509 certificate* should not be used*" | stats count by host CN component log_level | `splunk_protocol_impersonation_weak_encryption_selfsigned_filter`'
|
||||
description: On June 14th 2022, Splunk released vulnerability advisory addresing Python TLS validation which was not set before Splunk version 9. This search displays events showing WARNING of using Splunk issued default selfsigned certificates.
|
||||
how_to_implement: Must upgrade to Splunk version 9 and Configure TLS in order to apply this search. Splunk SOAR customers can find a SOAR workbook that walks an analyst through the process of running these hunting searches in the references list of this detection. In order to use this workbook, a user will need to run a curl command to post the file to their SOAR instance such as "curl -u username:password https://soar.instance.name/rest/rest/workbook_template -d @splunk_psa_0622.json". A user should then create an empty container or case, attach the workbook, and begin working through the tasks.
|
||||
known_false_positives: This searches finds self signed certificates issued by Splunk which are not recommended from Splunk version 9 forward.
|
||||
references:
|
||||
- https://www.splunk.com/en_us/product-security
|
||||
- https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/9.0.0/Security/EnableTLSCertHostnameValidation
|
||||
- https://www.github.com/splunk/security_content/blob/develop/workbooks/splunk_psa_0622.json
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
analytic_story:
|
||||
- Splunk Vulnerabilities
|
||||
asset_type: Endpoint
|
||||
cis20:
|
||||
- CIS 3
|
||||
- CIS 5
|
||||
- CIS 16
|
||||
cve:
|
||||
- CVE-2022-32152
|
||||
confidence: 80
|
||||
context:
|
||||
- Source:Endpoint
|
||||
dataset:
|
||||
- https://raw.githubusercontent.com/splunk/attack_data/master/datasets/attack_techniques/T1558.004/splunk_protocol_impersonation_weak_encryption_selfsigned.txt
|
||||
impact: 50
|
||||
kill_chain_phases:
|
||||
- Exploitation
|
||||
message: Splunk default issued certificate at $host$
|
||||
mitre_attack_id:
|
||||
- T1588.004
|
||||
nist:
|
||||
- DE.CM
|
||||
observable:
|
||||
- name: Hostname
|
||||
type: Hostname
|
||||
role:
|
||||
- Victim
|
||||
product:
|
||||
- Splunk Enterprise
|
||||
- Splunk Enterprise Security
|
||||
- Splunk Cloud
|
||||
required_fields:
|
||||
- host
|
||||
- CN
|
||||
- event_message
|
||||
risk_score: 40
|
||||
security_domain: threat
|
||||
+53
@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
|
||||
name: Splunk protocol impersonation weak encryption simplerequest
|
||||
id: 839d12a6-b119-4d44-ac4f-13eed95412c8
|
||||
version: 1
|
||||
date: '2022-05-24'
|
||||
author: Rod Soto, Splunk
|
||||
type: Hunting
|
||||
datamodel: []
|
||||
search: '`splunk_python` "simpleRequest SSL certificate validation is enabled without hostname verification" | stats count by host path | `splunk_protocol_impersonation_weak_encryption_simplerequest_filter`'
|
||||
description: On Splunk version 9 on Python3 client libraries verify server certificates by default and use CA certificate store. This search warns a user about a failure to validate a certificate using python3 request.
|
||||
how_to_implement: Must upgrade to Splunk version 9 and Configure TLS host name validation for Splunk Python modules in order to apply this search. Splunk SOAR customers can find a SOAR workbook that walks an analyst through the process of running these hunting searches in the references list of this detection. In order to use this workbook, a user will need to run a curl command to post the file to their SOAR instance such as "curl -u username:password https://soar.instance.name/rest/rest/workbook_template -d @splunk_psa_0622.json". A user should then create an empty container or case, attach the workbook, and begin working through the tasks.
|
||||
known_false_positives: This search tries to address validation of server and client certificates within Splunk infrastructure, it might produce results from accidental or unintended requests to port 8089.
|
||||
references:
|
||||
- https://www.splunk.com/en_us/product-security
|
||||
- https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/9.0.0/Security/EnableTLSCertHostnameValidation
|
||||
- https://www.github.com/splunk/security_content/blob/develop/workbooks/splunk_psa_0622.json
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
analytic_story:
|
||||
- Splunk Vulnerabilities
|
||||
asset_type: Endpoint
|
||||
cve:
|
||||
- CVE-2022-32152
|
||||
cis20:
|
||||
- CIS 3
|
||||
- CIS 5
|
||||
- CIS 16
|
||||
confidence: 80
|
||||
context:
|
||||
- Source:Endpoint
|
||||
dataset:
|
||||
- https://raw.githubusercontent.com/splunk/attack_data/master/datasets/attack_techniques/T1558.004/splk_protocol_impersonation_weak_encryption_simplerequest.txt
|
||||
impact: 50
|
||||
kill_chain_phases:
|
||||
- Exploitation
|
||||
message: Failed to validate certificate on $host$
|
||||
mitre_attack_id:
|
||||
- T1588.004
|
||||
nist:
|
||||
- DE.CM
|
||||
observable:
|
||||
- name: Hostname
|
||||
type: Hostname
|
||||
role:
|
||||
- Victim
|
||||
product:
|
||||
- Splunk Enterprise
|
||||
- Splunk Enterprise Security
|
||||
- Splunk Cloud
|
||||
required_fields:
|
||||
- host
|
||||
- event_message
|
||||
- path
|
||||
risk_score: 40
|
||||
security_domain: threat
|
||||
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
|
||||
name: Excessive Usage of NSLOOKUP App
|
||||
id: 0a69fdaa-a2b8-11eb-b16d-acde48001122
|
||||
version: 1
|
||||
date: '2021-04-21'
|
||||
version: 2
|
||||
date: '2022-06-03'
|
||||
author: Teoderick Contreras, Stanislav Miskovic, Splunk
|
||||
type: Anomaly
|
||||
datamodel:
|
||||
@@ -12,12 +12,16 @@ description: This search is to detect potential DNS exfiltration using nslookup
|
||||
use of nslookup where it tries to use specific record type (TXT, A, AAAA) that are
|
||||
commonly used by attacker and also the retry parameter which is designed to query
|
||||
C2 DNS multiple tries.
|
||||
search: '`sysmon` EventCode = 1 process_name = "nslookup.exe" | bucket _time span=15m
|
||||
| stats count as numNsLookup by Computer, _time | eventstats avg(numNsLookup) as
|
||||
avgNsLookup, stdev(numNsLookup) as stdNsLookup, count as numSlots by Computer | eval
|
||||
upperThreshold=(avgNsLookup + stdNsLookup *3) | eval isOutlier=if(avgNsLookup >
|
||||
20 and avgNsLookup >= upperThreshold, 1, 0) | search isOutlier=1 | `security_content_ctime(firstTime)`
|
||||
| `security_content_ctime(lastTime)` | `excessive_usage_of_nslookup_app_filter`'
|
||||
search: '`sysmon` EventCode = 1 process_name = "nslookup.exe"
|
||||
| bucket _time span=1m
|
||||
| stats count as numNsLookup by Computer, _time
|
||||
| eventstats avg(numNsLookup) as avgNsLookup, stdev(numNsLookup) as stdNsLookup, count as numSlots by Computer
|
||||
| eval upperThreshold=(avgNsLookup + stdNsLookup *3)
|
||||
| eval isOutlier=if(numNsLookup > 20 and numNsLookup >= upperThreshold, 1, 0)
|
||||
| search isOutlier=1
|
||||
| `security_content_ctime(firstTime)`
|
||||
| `security_content_ctime(lastTime)`
|
||||
| `excessive_usage_of_nslookup_app_filter`'
|
||||
how_to_implement: To successfully implement this search, you need to be ingesting
|
||||
logs with the process name, parent process, and command-line executions from your
|
||||
endpoints. If you are using Sysmon, you must have at least version 6.0.4 of the
|
||||
@@ -39,6 +43,7 @@ tags:
|
||||
- Scope:Local
|
||||
- Stage:Exfiltration
|
||||
dataset:
|
||||
- https://media.githubusercontent.com/media/splunk/attack_data/master/datasets/attack_techniques/T1048.003/nslookup_exfil/sysmon.log
|
||||
- https://media.githubusercontent.com/media/splunk/attack_data/master/datasets/attack_techniques/T1048.003/nslookup_exfil/windows-sysmon.log
|
||||
impact: 40
|
||||
kill_chain_phases:
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,12 +1,13 @@
|
||||
name: Java Writing JSP File
|
||||
id: eb65619c-4f8d-4383-a975-d352765d344b
|
||||
version: 1
|
||||
date: '2022-04-05'
|
||||
version: 2
|
||||
date: '2022-06-03'
|
||||
author: Michael Haag, Splunk
|
||||
type: TTP
|
||||
datamodel:
|
||||
- Endpoint
|
||||
description: The following analytic identifies the process java writing a .jsp to disk. This is potentially indicative of a web shell being written to disk.
|
||||
Modify and tune the analytic based on data ingested. For instance, it may be worth running a broad query for jsp file writes first before performing a join.
|
||||
search: '| tstats `security_content_summariesonly` count FROM datamodel=Endpoint.Processes where Processes.process_name IN ("java","java.exe", "javaw.exe")
|
||||
by _time Processes.process_id Processes.process_name Processes.dest Processes.process_guid
|
||||
Processes.user | `drop_dm_object_name(Processes)` | join process_guid [| tstats
|
||||
@@ -26,6 +27,7 @@ references:
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
analytic_story:
|
||||
- Spring4Shell CVE-2022-22965
|
||||
- Atlassian Confluence Server and Data Center CVE-2022-26134
|
||||
cve:
|
||||
- CVE-2022-22965
|
||||
asset_type: Endpoint
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
|
||||
name: Linux Iptables Firewall Modification
|
||||
id: 309d59dc-1e1b-49b2-9800-7cf18d12f7b7
|
||||
version: 2
|
||||
date: '2022-04-30'
|
||||
version: 3
|
||||
date: '2022-06-03'
|
||||
author: Teoderick Contreras, Splunk
|
||||
type: Anomaly
|
||||
datamodel:
|
||||
@@ -12,10 +12,11 @@ description: This analytic looks for suspicious commandline that modify the ipta
|
||||
search: '| tstats `security_content_summariesonly` count min(_time) as firstTime max(_time) as lastTime from datamodel=Endpoint.Processes
|
||||
where Processes.process = "*iptables *" AND Processes.process = "* --dport *" AND Processes.process = "* ACCEPT*" AND Processes.process = "*&>/dev/null*"
|
||||
AND Processes.process = "* tcp *" AND NOT(Processes.parent_process_path IN("/bin/*", "/lib/*", "/usr/bin/*", "/sbin/*"))
|
||||
by Processes.process_name Processes.process Processes.process_id Processes.parent_process_id Processes.process_guid Processes.dest
|
||||
by Processes.process_name Processes.process Processes.process_id Processes.parent_process_id Processes.process_guid Processes.dest _time span=10s
|
||||
Processes.user Processes.parent_process_name Processes.parent_process_path Processes.process_path
|
||||
| rex field=Processes.process "--dport (?<port>3269|636|989|994|995|8443)"
|
||||
| stats values(Processes.process) as processes_exec values(port) as ports values(Processes.process_guid) as guids values(Processes.process_id) as pids dc(port) as port_count count by Processes.process_name Processes.parent_process_name Processes.parent_process_id Processes.dest Processes.user Processes.parent_process_path Processes.process_path firstTime lastTime | where port_count >=3
|
||||
| stats values(Processes.process) as processes_exec values(port) as ports values(Processes.process_guid) as guids values(Processes.process_id) as pids dc(port) as port_count count
|
||||
by Processes.process_name Processes.parent_process_name Processes.parent_process_id Processes.dest Processes.user Processes.parent_process_path Processes.process_path | where port_count >=3
|
||||
| `drop_dm_object_name(Processes)`
|
||||
| `security_content_ctime(firstTime)`
|
||||
| `security_content_ctime(lastTime)`
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
|
||||
name: MSHTML Module Load in Office Product
|
||||
id: 5f1c168e-118b-11ec-84ff-acde48001122
|
||||
version: 1
|
||||
date: '2021-09-09'
|
||||
author: Michael Haag, Splunk
|
||||
version: 2
|
||||
date: '2022-06-01'
|
||||
author: Michael Haag, Mauricio Velazco, Splunk
|
||||
type: TTP
|
||||
datamodel:
|
||||
- Endpoint
|
||||
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ description: The following detection identifies the module load of mshtml.dll in
|
||||
search: '`sysmon` EventID=7 process_name IN ("winword.exe","excel.exe","powerpnt.exe","mspub.exe","visio.exe","wordpad.exe","wordview.exe")
|
||||
ImageLoaded IN ("*\\mshtml.dll", "*\\Microsoft.mshtml.dll","*\\IE.Interop.MSHTML.dll","*\\MshtmlDac.dll","*\\MshtmlDed.dll","*\\MshtmlDer.dll")
|
||||
| stats count min(_time) as firstTime max(_time) as lastTime by Computer, process_name,
|
||||
ImageLoaded, OriginalFileName, process_id | rename Computer as dest | `security_content_ctime(firstTime)`
|
||||
ImageLoaded, OriginalFileName, ProcessGuid | rename Computer as dest | `security_content_ctime(firstTime)`
|
||||
| `security_content_ctime(lastTime)` | `mshtml_module_load_in_office_product_filter`'
|
||||
how_to_implement: To successfully implement this search, you need to be ingesting
|
||||
logs with the process names and image loads from your endpoints. If you are using
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
||||
name: Spoolsv Suspicious Loaded Modules
|
||||
id: a5e451f8-da81-11eb-b245-acde48001122
|
||||
version: 1
|
||||
version: 2
|
||||
date: '2021-07-01'
|
||||
author: Mauricio Velazco, Michael Haag, Teoderick Contreras, Splunk
|
||||
type: TTP
|
||||
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ description: This search is to detect suspicious loading of dll in specific path
|
||||
search: '`sysmon` EventCode=7 Image ="*\\spoolsv.exe" ImageLoaded="*\\Windows\\System32\\spool\\drivers\\x64\\*"
|
||||
ImageLoaded = "*.dll" | stats dc(ImageLoaded) as countImgloaded values(ImageLoaded)
|
||||
as ImgLoaded count min(_time) as firstTime max(_time) as lastTime by Image Computer
|
||||
process_id EventCode | where countImgloaded >= 3 | `security_content_ctime(firstTime)`
|
||||
ProcessId EventCode | where countImgloaded >= 3 | `security_content_ctime(firstTime)`
|
||||
| `security_content_ctime(lastTime)` | `spoolsv_suspicious_loaded_modules_filter`'
|
||||
how_to_implement: To successfully implement this search, you need to be ingesting
|
||||
logs with the process name and imageloaded executions from your endpoints. If you
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
|
||||
name: Suspicious Process With Discord DNS Query
|
||||
id: 4d4332ae-792c-11ec-89c1-acde48001122
|
||||
version: 1
|
||||
date: '2022-01-19'
|
||||
author: Teoderick Contreras, Splunk
|
||||
version: 2
|
||||
date: '2022-06-01'
|
||||
author: Teoderick Contreras, Mauricio Velazco, Splunk
|
||||
type: Anomaly
|
||||
datamodel:
|
||||
- Endpoint
|
||||
@@ -11,10 +11,10 @@ description: This analytic identifies a process making a DNS query to Discord, a
|
||||
by adversaries, as seen in the WhisperGate campaign, to host and download malicious.
|
||||
external files. A process resolving a Discord DNS name could be an indicator of
|
||||
malware trying to download files from Discord for further execution.
|
||||
search: '`sysmon` EventCode=22 QueryName IN ("*discord*") process_path != "*\\AppData\\Local\\Discord\\*"
|
||||
AND process_path != "*\\Program Files*" AND process_name != "discord.exe" | stats
|
||||
search: '`sysmon` EventCode=22 QueryName IN ("*discord*") Image != "*\\AppData\\Local\\Discord\\*"
|
||||
AND Image != "*\\Program Files*" AND Image != "discord.exe" | stats
|
||||
count min(_time) as firstTime max(_time) as lastTime by Image QueryName QueryStatus
|
||||
process_name QueryResults Computer process_path | `security_content_ctime(firstTime)`
|
||||
process_name QueryResults Computer | `security_content_ctime(firstTime)`
|
||||
| `security_content_ctime(lastTime)` | `suspicious_process_with_discord_dns_query_filter`'
|
||||
how_to_implement: his detection relies on sysmon logs with the Event ID 22, DNS Query.
|
||||
known_false_positives: Noise and false positive can be seen if the following instant
|
||||
@@ -68,7 +68,6 @@ tags:
|
||||
- process_name
|
||||
- QueryResults
|
||||
- Computer
|
||||
- process_path
|
||||
risk_score: 64
|
||||
security_domain: endpoint
|
||||
asset_type: Endpoint
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
|
||||
name: Unload Sysmon Filter Driver
|
||||
id: e5928ff3-23eb-4d8b-b8a4-dcbc844fdfbe
|
||||
version: 3
|
||||
date: '2020-07-22'
|
||||
version: 4
|
||||
date: '2022-06-01'
|
||||
author: Bhavin Patel, Splunk
|
||||
type: TTP
|
||||
datamodel:
|
||||
@@ -22,12 +22,13 @@ how_to_implement: You must be ingesting data that records process activity from
|
||||
The command-line arguments are mapped to the "process" field in the Endpoint data
|
||||
model. This search is also shipped with `unload_sysmon_filter_driver_filter` macro,
|
||||
update this macro to filter out false positives.
|
||||
known_false_positives: ''
|
||||
references: []
|
||||
known_false_positives: 'Unknown at the moment'
|
||||
references:
|
||||
- https://www.ired.team/offensive-security/defense-evasion/unloading-sysmon-driver
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
analytic_story:
|
||||
- Disabling Security Tools
|
||||
asset_type: ''
|
||||
asset_type: Endpoint
|
||||
cis20:
|
||||
- CIS 8
|
||||
confidence: 90
|
||||
@@ -35,7 +36,7 @@ tags:
|
||||
- Source:Endpoint
|
||||
- Stage:Defense Evasion
|
||||
dataset:
|
||||
- https://media.githubusercontent.com/media/splunk/attack_data/master/datasets/attack_techniques/T1562.001/atomic_red_team/windows-sysmon.log
|
||||
- https://media.githubusercontent.com/media/splunk/attack_data/master/datasets/attack_techniques/T1562.001/unload_sysmon/windows-sysmon.log
|
||||
impact: 50
|
||||
kill_chain_phases:
|
||||
- Actions on Objectives
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
|
||||
name: Wermgr Process Connecting To IP Check Web Services
|
||||
id: ed313326-a0f9-11eb-a89c-acde48001122
|
||||
version: 1
|
||||
date: '2021-04-19'
|
||||
author: Teoderick Contreras, Splunk
|
||||
version: 2
|
||||
date: '2022-06-01'
|
||||
author: Teoderick Contreras, Mauricio Velazco, Splunk
|
||||
type: TTP
|
||||
datamodel:
|
||||
- Endpoint
|
||||
@@ -17,8 +17,8 @@ search: '`sysmon` EventCode =22 process_name = wermgr.exe QueryName IN ("*wtfism
|
||||
"*checkip.amazonaws.com", "*ipecho.net", "*ipinfo.io", "*api.ipify.org", "*icanhazip.com",
|
||||
"*ip.anysrc.com","*api.ip.sb", "ident.me", "www.myexternalip.com", "*zen.spamhaus.org",
|
||||
"*cbl.abuseat.org", "*b.barracudacentral.org","*dnsbl-1.uceprotect.net", "*spam.dnsbl.sorbs.net")
|
||||
| stats min(_time) as firstTime max(_time) as lastTime count by process_path
|
||||
process_name process_id QueryName QueryStatus QueryResults Computer EventCode |
|
||||
| stats min(_time) as firstTime max(_time) as lastTime count by Image
|
||||
process_name ProcessId QueryName QueryStatus QueryResults Computer EventCode |
|
||||
`security_content_ctime(firstTime)` | `security_content_ctime(lastTime)` | `wermgr_process_connecting_to_ip_check_web_services_filter`'
|
||||
how_to_implement: To successfully implement this search, you need to be ingesting
|
||||
logs with the process name, dns query name process path , and query ststus from
|
||||
|
||||
+79
@@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
|
||||
name: Windows Command and Scripting Interpreter Hunting Path Traversal
|
||||
id: d0026380-b3c4-4da0-ac8e-02790063ff6b
|
||||
version: 1
|
||||
date: '2022-06-01'
|
||||
author: Teoderick Contreras, Michael Haag, Splunk
|
||||
type: Hunting
|
||||
datamodel:
|
||||
- Endpoint
|
||||
description: The following analytic identifies path traversal command-line execution and should be used to tune and driver other more higher fidelity analytics. This technique was seen in malicious document that execute malicious code
|
||||
using msdt.exe and path traversal technique that serve as defense evasion. This Hunting query is a good pivot to look for possible suspicious process and command-line
|
||||
that runs execute path traversal technique to run malicious code. This may help you to find possible downloaded malware or other lolbin execution.
|
||||
search: '| tstats `security_content_summariesonly` count min(_time) as firstTime max(_time)
|
||||
as lastTime FROM datamodel=Endpoint.Processes by
|
||||
Processes.original_file_name Processes.process_id Processes.parent_process_id Processes.process_hash
|
||||
Processes.dest Processes.user Processes.parent_process Processes.process_name Processes.process
|
||||
| `drop_dm_object_name("Processes")`
|
||||
| `security_content_ctime(firstTime)`
|
||||
| `security_content_ctime(lastTime)`
|
||||
| eval count_of_pattern1 = (mvcount(split(process,"/.."))-1)
|
||||
| eval count_of_pattern2 = (mvcount(split(process,"\.."))-1)
|
||||
| eval count_of_pattern3 = (mvcount(split(process,"\\.."))-1)
|
||||
| eval count_of_pattern4 = (mvcount(split(process,"//.."))-1)
|
||||
| search count_of_pattern1 > 1 OR count_of_pattern2 > 1 OR count_of_pattern3 > 1 OR count_of_pattern4 > 1
|
||||
| `windows_command_and_scripting_interpreter_hunting_path_traversal_filter`'
|
||||
how_to_implement: To successfully implement this search you need to be ingesting information
|
||||
on process that include the name of the process responsible for the changes from
|
||||
your endpoints into the `Endpoint` datamodel in the `Processes` node. In addition,
|
||||
confirm the latest CIM App 4.20 or higher is installed and the latest TA for the
|
||||
endpoint product
|
||||
known_false_positives: false positive may vary depends on the score you want to check. The bigger number of path traversal string count the better.
|
||||
references:
|
||||
- https://app.any.run/tasks/713f05d2-fe78-4b9d-a744-f7c133e3fafb/
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
analytic_story:
|
||||
- Windows Defense Evasion Tactics
|
||||
- Microsoft Support Diagnostic Tool Vulnerability CVE-2022-30190
|
||||
asset_type: Endpoint
|
||||
cis20:
|
||||
- CIS 3
|
||||
- CIS 5
|
||||
- CIS 16
|
||||
confidence: 60
|
||||
context:
|
||||
- Source:Endpoint
|
||||
- Stage:Defense Evasion
|
||||
dataset:
|
||||
- https://media.githubusercontent.com/media/splunk/attack_data/master/datasets/attack_techniques/T1059/path_traversal/sysmon.log
|
||||
impact: 60
|
||||
kill_chain_phases:
|
||||
- Exploitation
|
||||
message: A parent process $parent_process_name$ has spawned a child $process_name$ with path traversal commandline $process$ in $dest$
|
||||
mitre_attack_id:
|
||||
- T1059
|
||||
nist:
|
||||
- DE.CM
|
||||
observable:
|
||||
- name: dest
|
||||
type: Hostname
|
||||
role:
|
||||
- Victim
|
||||
product:
|
||||
- Splunk Enterprise
|
||||
- Splunk Enterprise Security
|
||||
- Splunk Cloud
|
||||
required_fields:
|
||||
- _time
|
||||
- Processes.dest
|
||||
- Processes.user
|
||||
- Processes.parent_process_name #parent process name
|
||||
- Processes.parent_process #parent cmdline
|
||||
- Processes.original_file_name
|
||||
- Processes.process_name #process name
|
||||
- Processes.process #process cmdline
|
||||
- Processes.process_id
|
||||
- Processes.parent_process_path
|
||||
- Processes.process_path
|
||||
- Processes.parent_process_id
|
||||
risk_score: 36
|
||||
security_domain: endpoint
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
|
||||
name: Windows Command and Scripting Interpreter Path Traversal Exec
|
||||
id: 58fcdeb1-728d-415d-b0d7-3ab18a275ec2
|
||||
version: 2
|
||||
date: '2022-06-01'
|
||||
author: Teoderick Contreras, Splunk
|
||||
type: TTP
|
||||
datamodel:
|
||||
- Endpoint
|
||||
description: The following analytic identifies path traversal command-line execution. This technique was seen in malicious document that execute malicious code
|
||||
using msdt.exe and path traversal technique that serve as defense evasion. This TTP is a good pivot to look for more suspicious process and command-line
|
||||
that runs before and after this execution. This may help you to find possible downloaded malware or other lolbin execution.
|
||||
search: '| tstats `security_content_summariesonly` count min(_time) as firstTime max(_time)
|
||||
as lastTime FROM datamodel=Endpoint.Processes where Processes.process="*\/..\/..\/..\/*" OR Processes.process="*\\..\\..\\..\\*" OR Processes.process="*\/\/..\/\/..\/\/..\/\/*" by
|
||||
Processes.dest Processes.user Processes.parent_process Processes.process_name Processes.process
|
||||
Processes.original_file_name Processes.process_id Processes.parent_process_id Processes.process_hash
|
||||
| `drop_dm_object_name("Processes")`
|
||||
| `security_content_ctime(firstTime)`
|
||||
| `security_content_ctime(lastTime)`
|
||||
| `windows_command_and_scripting_interpreter_path_traversal_exec_filter`'
|
||||
how_to_implement: To successfully implement this search you need to be ingesting information
|
||||
on process that include the name of the process responsible for the changes from
|
||||
your endpoints into the `Endpoint` datamodel in the `Processes` node. In addition,
|
||||
confirm the latest CIM App 4.20 or higher is installed and the latest TA for the
|
||||
endpoint product
|
||||
known_false_positives: Not known at this moment.
|
||||
references:
|
||||
- https://app.any.run/tasks/713f05d2-fe78-4b9d-a744-f7c133e3fafb/
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
analytic_story:
|
||||
- Windows Defense Evasion Tactics
|
||||
- Microsoft Support Diagnostic Tool Vulnerability CVE-2022-30190
|
||||
asset_type: Endpoint
|
||||
cis20:
|
||||
- CIS 3
|
||||
- CIS 5
|
||||
- CIS 16
|
||||
confidence: 100
|
||||
context:
|
||||
- Source:Endpoint
|
||||
- Stage:Defense Evasion
|
||||
dataset:
|
||||
- https://media.githubusercontent.com/media/splunk/attack_data/master/datasets/attack_techniques/T1059/path_traversal/sysmon.log
|
||||
impact: 90
|
||||
kill_chain_phases:
|
||||
- Exploitation
|
||||
message: A parent process $parent_process_name$ has spawned a child $process_name$ with path traversal commandline $process$ in $dest$
|
||||
mitre_attack_id:
|
||||
- T1059
|
||||
nist:
|
||||
- DE.CM
|
||||
observable:
|
||||
- name: dest
|
||||
type: Hostname
|
||||
role:
|
||||
- Victim
|
||||
product:
|
||||
- Splunk Enterprise
|
||||
- Splunk Enterprise Security
|
||||
- Splunk Cloud
|
||||
required_fields:
|
||||
- _time
|
||||
- Processes.dest
|
||||
- Processes.user
|
||||
- Processes.parent_process_name #parent process name
|
||||
- Processes.parent_process #parent cmdline
|
||||
- Processes.original_file_name
|
||||
- Processes.process_name #process name
|
||||
- Processes.process #process cmdline
|
||||
- Processes.process_id
|
||||
- Processes.parent_process_path
|
||||
- Processes.process_path
|
||||
- Processes.parent_process_id
|
||||
risk_score: 90
|
||||
security_domain: endpoint
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
|
||||
name: Windows Execute Arbitrary Commands with MSDT
|
||||
id: e1d5145f-38fe-42b9-a5d5-457796715f97
|
||||
version: 2
|
||||
date: '2022-05-30'
|
||||
author: Michael Haag, Teoderick Contreras, Splunk
|
||||
type: TTP
|
||||
datamodel:
|
||||
- Endpoint
|
||||
description: The following analytic identifies a recently disclosed arbitraty command execution using Windows msdt.exe - a Diagnostics Troubleshooting Wizard. The sample identified will use the ms-msdt:/ protocol handler to load msdt.exe to retrieve a remote payload.
|
||||
During triage, review file modifications for html. Identify parallel process execution that may be related, including an Office Product.
|
||||
search: '| tstats `security_content_summariesonly` count min(_time) as firstTime max(_time)
|
||||
as lastTime from datamodel=Endpoint.Processes where Processes.process_name=msdt.exe
|
||||
Processes.process IN ("*ms-msdt:/id*","*ms-msdt:-id*","*/id*") AND (Processes.process="*IT_BrowseForFile=*" OR Processes.process="*IT_RebrowseForFile=*" OR Processes.process="*.xml*") AND Processes.process="*PCWDiagnostic*" by Processes.dest Processes.user Processes.parent_process_name Processes.process_name
|
||||
Processes.process Processes.process_id Processes.parent_process_id
|
||||
| `drop_dm_object_name(Processes)`
|
||||
| `security_content_ctime(firstTime)`
|
||||
| `security_content_ctime(lastTime)`| `windows_execute_arbitrary_commands_with_msdt_filter`'
|
||||
how_to_implement: To successfully implement this search you need to be ingesting information on process that include the name of the process responsible for the changes from your endpoints into the `Endpoint` datamodel in the `Processes` node. In addition, confirm the latest CIM App 4.20 or higher is installed and the latest TA for the endpoint product.
|
||||
known_false_positives: False positives may be present, filter as needed. Added .xml to potentially capture any answer file usage. Remove as needed.
|
||||
references:
|
||||
- https://isc.sans.edu/diary/rss/28694
|
||||
- https://doublepulsar.com/follina-a-microsoft-office-code-execution-vulnerability-1a47fce5629e
|
||||
- https://twitter.com/nao_sec/status/1530196847679401984?s=20&t=ZiXYI4dQuA-0_dzQzSUb3A
|
||||
- https://app.any.run/tasks/713f05d2-fe78-4b9d-a744-f7c133e3fafb/
|
||||
- https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/4a24048f81afbe9fb62e7a6a49adbd1faf41f266b5f9feecdceb567aec096784/detection
|
||||
- https://strontic.github.io/xcyclopedia/library/msdt.exe-152D4C9F63EFB332CCB134C6953C0104.html
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
analytic_story:
|
||||
- Microsoft Support Diagnostic Tool Vulnerability CVE-2022-30190
|
||||
asset_type: Endpoint
|
||||
cve:
|
||||
- CVE-2022-30190
|
||||
cis20:
|
||||
- CIS 3
|
||||
- CIS 5
|
||||
- CIS 16
|
||||
confidence: 100
|
||||
context:
|
||||
- Source:Endpoint
|
||||
- Stage:Defense Evasion
|
||||
dataset:
|
||||
- https://media.githubusercontent.com/media/splunk/attack_data/master/datasets/attack_techniques/T1566.001/macro/msdt.log
|
||||
impact: 100
|
||||
kill_chain_phases:
|
||||
- Exploitation
|
||||
message: A parent process $parent_process_name$ has spawned a child
|
||||
process $process_name$ on host $dest$ possibly indicative of indirect command execution.
|
||||
mitre_attack_id:
|
||||
- T1218
|
||||
nist:
|
||||
- DE.CM
|
||||
observable:
|
||||
- name: user
|
||||
type: User
|
||||
role:
|
||||
- Victim
|
||||
- name: dest
|
||||
type: Hostname
|
||||
role:
|
||||
- Victim
|
||||
- name: parent_process_name
|
||||
type: Process
|
||||
role:
|
||||
- Parent Process
|
||||
- name: process_name
|
||||
type: Process
|
||||
role:
|
||||
- Child Process
|
||||
product:
|
||||
- Splunk Enterprise
|
||||
- Splunk Enterprise Security
|
||||
- Splunk Cloud
|
||||
required_fields:
|
||||
- _time
|
||||
- Processes.dest
|
||||
- Processes.user
|
||||
- Processes.parent_process_name #parent process name
|
||||
- Processes.parent_process #parent cmdline
|
||||
- Processes.original_file_name
|
||||
- Processes.process_name #process name
|
||||
- Processes.process #process cmdline
|
||||
- Processes.process_id
|
||||
- Processes.parent_process_path
|
||||
- Processes.process_path
|
||||
- Processes.parent_process_id
|
||||
risk_score: 100
|
||||
security_domain: endpoint
|
||||
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
|
||||
name: Windows InstallUtil Credential Theft
|
||||
id: ccfeddec-43ec-11ec-b494-acde48001122
|
||||
version: 1
|
||||
date: '2021-11-12'
|
||||
author: Michael Haag, Splunk
|
||||
version: 2
|
||||
date: '2022-06-01'
|
||||
author: Michael Haag, Mauricio Velazo, Splunk
|
||||
type: TTP
|
||||
datamodel:
|
||||
- Endpoint
|
||||
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ description: 'The following analytic identifies the Windows InstallUtil.exe bina
|
||||
processes. Capture any artifacts and review further.'
|
||||
search: '`sysmon` EventCode=7 process_name=installutil.exe ImageLoaded IN ("*\\samlib.dll",
|
||||
"*\\vaultcli.dll") | stats count min(_time) as firstTime max(_time) as lastTime
|
||||
by Computer, process_name, ImageLoaded, OriginalFileName, process_id | rename Computer
|
||||
by Computer, process_name, ImageLoaded, OriginalFileName, ProcessId | rename Computer
|
||||
as dest | `security_content_ctime(firstTime)` | `security_content_ctime(lastTime)`
|
||||
| `windows_installutil_credential_theft_filter`'
|
||||
how_to_implement: To successfully implement this search, you need to be ingesting
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
|
||||
name: Windows Office Product Spawning MSDT
|
||||
id: 127eba64-c981-40bf-8589-1830638864a7
|
||||
version: 1
|
||||
date: '2022-05-30'
|
||||
author: Michael Haag, Teoderick Contreras, Splunk
|
||||
type: TTP
|
||||
datamodel:
|
||||
- Endpoint
|
||||
description: The following analytic identifies a Microsoft Office product spawning the Windows msdt.exe process. MSDT is a Diagnostics Troubleshooting Wizard native to Windows. This behavior is related to a recently identified sample utilizing protocol handlers to evade preventative controls, including if macros are disabled in the document.
|
||||
During triage, review file modifications for html. In addition, parallel processes including PowerShell and CertUtil.
|
||||
search: '| tstats `security_content_summariesonly` count min(_time) as firstTime max(_time)
|
||||
as lastTime from datamodel=Endpoint.Processes where Processes.parent_process_name
|
||||
IN ("winword.exe","excel.exe","powerpnt.exe","outlook.exe","mspub.exe","visio.exe") Processes.process_name=msdt.exe
|
||||
by Processes.dest Processes.user Processes.parent_process Processes.process_name
|
||||
Processes.original_file_name Processes.process Processes.process_id Processes.parent_process_id
|
||||
| `drop_dm_object_name(Processes)` | `security_content_ctime(firstTime)`| `security_content_ctime(lastTime)`
|
||||
| `windows_office_product_spawning_msdt_filter`'
|
||||
how_to_implement: how To successfully implement this search you need to be ingesting information on process that include the name of the process responsible for the changes from your endpoints into the `Endpoint` datamodel in the `Processes` node. In addition, confirm the latest CIM App 4.20 or higher is installed and the latest TA for the endpoint product.
|
||||
known_false_positives: False positives should be limited, however filter as needed.
|
||||
references:
|
||||
- https://isc.sans.edu/diary/rss/28694
|
||||
- https://doublepulsar.com/follina-a-microsoft-office-code-execution-vulnerability-1a47fce5629e
|
||||
- https://twitter.com/nao_sec/status/1530196847679401984?s=20&t=ZiXYI4dQuA-0_dzQzSUb3A
|
||||
- https://app.any.run/tasks/713f05d2-fe78-4b9d-a744-f7c133e3fafb/
|
||||
- https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/4a24048f81afbe9fb62e7a6a49adbd1faf41f266b5f9feecdceb567aec096784/detection
|
||||
- https://strontic.github.io/xcyclopedia/library/msdt.exe-152D4C9F63EFB332CCB134C6953C0104.html
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
analytic_story:
|
||||
- Spearphishing Attachments
|
||||
- Microsoft Support Diagnostic Tool Vulnerability CVE-2022-30190
|
||||
asset_type: Endpoint
|
||||
cve:
|
||||
- CVE-2022-30190
|
||||
cis20:
|
||||
- CIS 3
|
||||
- CIS 5
|
||||
- CIS 16
|
||||
confidence: 100
|
||||
context:
|
||||
- Source:Endpoint
|
||||
- Stage:Defense Evasion
|
||||
dataset:
|
||||
- https://media.githubusercontent.com/media/splunk/attack_data/master/datasets/attack_techniques/T1566.001/macro/msdt.log
|
||||
impact: 100
|
||||
kill_chain_phases:
|
||||
- Exploitation
|
||||
message: Office parent process $parent_process_name$ has spawned a child
|
||||
process $process_name$ on host $dest$.
|
||||
mitre_attack_id:
|
||||
- T1566
|
||||
- T1566.001
|
||||
nist:
|
||||
- DE.CM
|
||||
observable:
|
||||
- name: user
|
||||
type: User
|
||||
role:
|
||||
- Victim
|
||||
- name: dest
|
||||
type: Hostname
|
||||
role:
|
||||
- Victim
|
||||
- name: parent_process_name
|
||||
type: Process
|
||||
role:
|
||||
- Parent Process
|
||||
- name: process_name
|
||||
type: Process
|
||||
role:
|
||||
- Child Process
|
||||
product:
|
||||
- Splunk Enterprise
|
||||
- Splunk Enterprise Security
|
||||
- Splunk Cloud
|
||||
required_fields:
|
||||
- _time
|
||||
- Processes.dest
|
||||
- Processes.user
|
||||
- Processes.parent_process_name #parent process name
|
||||
- Processes.parent_process #parent cmdline
|
||||
- Processes.original_file_name
|
||||
- Processes.process_name #process name
|
||||
- Processes.process #process cmdline
|
||||
- Processes.process_id
|
||||
- Processes.parent_process_path
|
||||
- Processes.process_path
|
||||
- Processes.parent_process_id
|
||||
risk_score: 100
|
||||
security_domain: endpoint
|
||||
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
||||
name: Detect Unauthorized Assets by MAC address
|
||||
id: dcfd6b40-42f9-469d-a433-2e53f7489ff4
|
||||
version: 1
|
||||
version: 2
|
||||
date: '2017-09-13'
|
||||
author: Bhavin Patel, Splunk
|
||||
type: TTP
|
||||
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ description: By populating the organization's assets within the assets_by_str.cs
|
||||
associated with the source of the DHCP request is checked against the list of known
|
||||
devices, and reports on those that are not found.
|
||||
search: '| tstats `security_content_summariesonly` count from datamodel=Network_Sessions
|
||||
where nodename=All_Sessions.DHCP All_Sessions.signature=DHCPREQUEST by All_Sessions.src_ip
|
||||
where nodename=All_Sessions.DHCP All_Sessions.tag=dhcp by All_Sessions.dest_ip
|
||||
All_Sessions.dest_mac | dedup All_Sessions.dest_mac| `drop_dm_object_name("Network_Sessions")`|`drop_dm_object_name("All_Sessions")`
|
||||
| search NOT [| inputlookup asset_lookup_by_str |rename mac as dest_mac | fields
|
||||
+ dest_mac] | `detect_unauthorized_assets_by_mac_address_filter`'
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
|
||||
name: Splunk Identified SSL TLS Certificates
|
||||
id: 620fbb89-86fd-4e2e-925f-738374277586
|
||||
version: 1
|
||||
date: '2022-05-25'
|
||||
author: Michael Haag, Splunk
|
||||
type: Hunting
|
||||
datamodel: []
|
||||
description: The following analytic uses tags of SSL, TLS and certificate to identify the usage of the Splunk default certificates being utilized in the environment. Recommended guidance is to utilize valid TLS certificates which documentation may be found in Splunk Docs - https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/8.2.6/Security/AboutsecuringyourSplunkconfigurationwithSSL.
|
||||
search: 'tag IN (ssl, tls, certificate) ssl_issuer_common_name=*splunk* | stats values(src) AS "Host(s) with Default Cert" count by ssl_issuer ssl_subject_common_name ssl_subject_organization ssl_subject host sourcetype
|
||||
| `splunk_identified_ssl_tls_certificates_filter`'
|
||||
how_to_implement: Ingestion of SSL/TLS data is needed and to be tagged properly as ssl, tls or certificate. This data may come from a proxy, zeek, or Splunk Streams. Splunk SOAR customers can find a SOAR workbook that walks an analyst through the process of running these hunting searches in the references list of this detection. In order to use this workbook, a user will need to run a curl command to post the file to their SOAR instance such as "curl -u username:password https://soar.instance.name/rest/rest/workbook_template -d @splunk_psa_0622.json". A user should then create an empty container or case, attach the workbook, and begin working through the tasks.
|
||||
known_false_positives: False positives will not be present as it is meant to assist with identifying default certificates being utilized.
|
||||
references:
|
||||
- https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/8.2.6/Security/AboutsecuringyourSplunkconfigurationwithSSL
|
||||
- https://www.github.com/splunk/security_content/blob/develop/workbooks/splunk_psa_0622.json
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
analytic_story:
|
||||
- Splunk Vulnerabilities
|
||||
asset_type: Proxy
|
||||
cis20:
|
||||
- CIS 3
|
||||
- CIS 5
|
||||
- CIS 16
|
||||
cve:
|
||||
- CVE-2022-32151
|
||||
- CVE-2022-32152
|
||||
confidence: 70
|
||||
context:
|
||||
- Source:Application Log
|
||||
dataset:
|
||||
- https://media.githubusercontent.com/media/splunk/attack_data/master/datasets/attack_techniques/T1040/ssltls/ssl_splunk.log
|
||||
impact: 60
|
||||
kill_chain_phases:
|
||||
- Reconnaissance
|
||||
message: The following $dest$ is using the self signed Splunk certificate.
|
||||
mitre_attack_id:
|
||||
- T1040
|
||||
nist:
|
||||
- DE.CM
|
||||
observable:
|
||||
- name: dest
|
||||
type: Hostname
|
||||
role:
|
||||
- Victim
|
||||
product:
|
||||
- Splunk Enterprise
|
||||
- Splunk Enterprise Security
|
||||
- Splunk Cloud
|
||||
required_fields:
|
||||
- ssl_issuer
|
||||
- ssl_subject_common_name
|
||||
- ssl_subject_organization
|
||||
- ssl_subject
|
||||
- host
|
||||
- sourcetype
|
||||
risk_score: 42
|
||||
security_domain: network
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
|
||||
name: Confluence Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution CVE-2022-26134
|
||||
id: fcf4bd3f-a79f-4b7a-83bf-2692d60b859c
|
||||
version: 1
|
||||
date: '2022-06-03'
|
||||
author: Michael Haag, Splunk
|
||||
type: TTP
|
||||
datamodel:
|
||||
- Endpoint
|
||||
description: The following analytic assists with identifying CVE-2022-26134 based exploitation utilizing the Web datamodel to cover network and CIM compliant web logs. The parameters were captured from live scanning and the POC provided by Rapid7. This analytic is written against multiple proof of concept codes released and seen in the wild (scanning).
|
||||
During triage, review any endpoint based logs for further activity including writing a jsp file to disk and commands/processes spawning running as root from the Confluence process.
|
||||
search: '| tstats count min(_time) as firstTime max(_time)
|
||||
as lastTime from datamodel=Web where Web.url IN ("*${*", "*%2F%7B*") (Web.url="*org.apache.commons.io.IOUtils*" Web.url="*java.lang.Runtime@getRuntime().exec*") OR (Web.url="*java.lang.Runtime%40getRuntime%28%29.exec*") OR (Web.url="*getEngineByName*" AND Web.url="*nashorn*" AND Web.url="*ProcessBuilder*")
|
||||
by Web.http_user_agent Web.http_method, Web.url,Web.url_length Web.src, Web.dest sourcetype
|
||||
| `drop_dm_object_name("Web")`
|
||||
| `security_content_ctime(firstTime)`
|
||||
| `security_content_ctime(lastTime)`
|
||||
| `confluence_unauthenticated_remote_code_execution_cve_2022_26134_filter`'
|
||||
how_to_implement: This detection requires the Web datamodel to be populated from a
|
||||
supported Technology Add-On like Splunk for Apache or Splunk for Nginx. In addition, network based logs or event data like PAN Threat.
|
||||
known_false_positives: Tune based on assets if possible, or restrict to known Confluence servers. Remove the ${ for a more broad query. To identify more exec, remove everything up to the last parameter (Runtime().exec) for a broad query.
|
||||
references:
|
||||
- https://confluence.atlassian.com/doc/confluence-security-advisory-2022-06-02-1130377146.html
|
||||
- https://www.splunk.com/en_us/blog/security/atlassian-confluence-vulnerability-cve-2022-26134.html
|
||||
- https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/2022/06/02/active-exploitation-of-confluence-cve-2022-26134/
|
||||
- https://www.volexity.com/blog/2022/06/02/zero-day-exploitation-of-atlassian-confluence/
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
analytic_story:
|
||||
- Atlassian Confluence Server and Data Center CVE-2022-26134
|
||||
asset_type: Web Server
|
||||
cve:
|
||||
- CVE-2022-26134
|
||||
cis20:
|
||||
- CIS 3
|
||||
- CIS 5
|
||||
- CIS 16
|
||||
confidence: 100
|
||||
context:
|
||||
- Scope:Network
|
||||
dataset:
|
||||
- https://media.githubusercontent.com/media/splunk/attack_data/master/datasets/attack_techniques/T1190/java/confluence.log
|
||||
impact: 100
|
||||
kill_chain_phases:
|
||||
- Exploitation
|
||||
message: A URL was requested related to CVE-2022-26134, a unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability, on $dest$ by $src$.
|
||||
mitre_attack_id:
|
||||
- T1505
|
||||
- T1190
|
||||
nist:
|
||||
- DE.CM
|
||||
observable:
|
||||
- name: dest
|
||||
type: IP Address
|
||||
role:
|
||||
- Victim
|
||||
- name: src
|
||||
type: IP Address
|
||||
role:
|
||||
- Attacker
|
||||
product:
|
||||
- Splunk Enterprise
|
||||
- Splunk Enterprise Security
|
||||
- Splunk Cloud
|
||||
required_fields:
|
||||
- _time
|
||||
- Web.http_method
|
||||
- Web.url
|
||||
- Web.url_length
|
||||
- Web.src
|
||||
- Web.dest
|
||||
- Web.http_user_agent
|
||||
risk_score: 100
|
||||
security_domain: network
|
||||
Vendored
+1
-1
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
|
||||
"id": {
|
||||
"group": null,
|
||||
"name": "DA-ESS-ContentUpdate",
|
||||
"version": "3.40.0"
|
||||
"version": "3.43.0"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"author": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
||||
+183
-11
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
||||
#############
|
||||
# Automatically generated by generator.py in splunk/security_content
|
||||
# On Date: 2022-05-23T20:35:38 UTC
|
||||
# On Date: 2022-06-14T13:52:57 UTC
|
||||
# Author: Splunk Security Research
|
||||
# Contact: research@splunk.com
|
||||
#############
|
||||
@@ -17,6 +17,56 @@ annotations = {"cis20": ["CIS 3", "CIS 5", "CIS 16"], "kill_chain_phases": ["Exp
|
||||
known_false_positives = This search may find additional path traversal exploitation attempts.
|
||||
providing_technologies = []
|
||||
|
||||
[savedsearch://ESCU - Splunk Command and Scripting Interpreter Delete Usage - Rule]
|
||||
type = detection
|
||||
asset_type = Web Server
|
||||
confidence = medium
|
||||
explanation = The following analytic identifies the use of the risky command - Delete - that may be utilized in Splunk to delete some or all data queried for. In order to use Delete in Splunk, one must be assigned the role. This is typically not used and should generate an anomaly if it is used.
|
||||
how_to_implement = To successfully implement this search acceleration is recommended against the Search_Activity datamodel that runs against the splunk _audit index. In addition, this analytic requires the Common Information Model App which includes the Splunk Audit Datamodel https://splunkbase.splunk.com/app/1621/.
|
||||
annotations = {"cis20": ["CIS 3", "CIS 5", "CIS 16"], "kill_chain_phases": ["Actions on Objectives"], "mitre_attack": ["T1059"], "nist": ["DE.CM"]}
|
||||
known_false_positives = False positives may be present if this command is used as a common practice. Filter as needed.
|
||||
providing_technologies = []
|
||||
|
||||
[savedsearch://ESCU - Splunk Command and Scripting Interpreter Risky Commands - Rule]
|
||||
type = detection
|
||||
asset_type = Web Server
|
||||
confidence = medium
|
||||
explanation = The Splunk platform contains built-in search processing language (SPL) safeguards to warn you when you are about to unknowingly run a search that contains commands that might be a security risk. This warning appears when you click a link or type a URL that loads a search that contains risky commands. The warning does not appear when you create ad hoc searches. This warning alerts you to the possibility of unauthorized actions by a malicious user. Unauthorized actions include - Copying or transferring data (data exfiltration), Deleting data and Overwriting data. All risky commands may be found here https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/latest/Security/SPLsafeguards#Commands_that_trigger_the_warninga. A possible scenario when this might occur is when a malicious actor creates a search that includes commands that exfiltrate or damage data. The malicious actor then sends an unsuspecting user a link to the search. The URL contains a query string (q) and a search identifier (sid), but the sid is not valid. The malicious actor hopes the user will use the link and the search will run. During analysis, pivot based on user name and filter any user or queries not needed. Queries ran from a dashboard are seen as adhoc queries. When a query runs from a dashboard it will not show in audittrail logs the source dashboard name. The query defaults to adhoc and no Splunk system user activity. In addition, modify this query by removing key commands that generate too much noise, or too little, and create separate queries with higher confidence to alert on.
|
||||
how_to_implement = To successfully implement this search acceleration is recommended against the Search_Activity datamodel that runs against the splunk _audit index. In addition, this analytic requires the Common Information Model App which includes the Splunk Audit Datamodel https://splunkbase.splunk.com/app/1621/. Splunk SOAR customers can find a SOAR workbook that walks an analyst through the process of running these hunting searches in the references list of this detection. In order to use this workbook, a user will need to run a curl command to post the file to their SOAR instance such as "curl -u username:password https://soar.instance.name/rest/rest/workbook_template -d @splunk_psa_0622.json". A user should then create an empty container or case, attach the workbook, and begin working through the tasks.
|
||||
annotations = {"cis20": ["CIS 3", "CIS 5", "CIS 16"], "kill_chain_phases": ["Actions on Objectives"], "mitre_attack": ["T1059"], "nist": ["DE.CM"]}
|
||||
known_false_positives = False positives will be present until properly filtered by Username and search name.
|
||||
providing_technologies = []
|
||||
|
||||
[savedsearch://ESCU - Splunk Command and Scripting Interpreter Risky SPL MLTK - Rule]
|
||||
type = detection
|
||||
asset_type = Web Server
|
||||
confidence = medium
|
||||
explanation = This detection utilizes machine learning model named "risky_command_abuse" trained from "Splunk Command and Scripting Interpreter Risky SPL MLTK Baseline". It should be scheduled to run hourly to detect whether a user has run searches containing risky SPL from this list https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/latest/Security/SPLsafeguards#Commands_that_trigger_the_warninga with abnormally long running time in the past one hour, comparing with his/her past seven days history. This search uses the trained baseline to infer whether a search is an outlier (isOutlier ~= 1.0) or not (isOutlier~= 0.0)
|
||||
how_to_implement = This detection depends on MLTK app which can be found here - https://splunkbase.splunk.com/app/2890/ and the Splunk Audit datamodel which can be found here - https://splunkbase.splunk.com/app/1621/. Baseline model needs to be built using "Splunk Command and Scripting Interpreter Risky SPL MLTK Baseline" before this search can run. Please note that the current search only finds matches exactly one space between separator bar and risky commands.
|
||||
annotations = {"cis20": ["CIS 3", "CIS 6"], "kill_chain_phases": ["Actions on Objectives"], "mitre_attack": ["T1059"], "nist": ["DE.AE"]}
|
||||
known_false_positives = If the run time of a search exceeds the boundaries of outlier defined by the fitted density function model, false positives can occur, incorrectly labeling a long running search as potentially risky.
|
||||
providing_technologies = []
|
||||
|
||||
[savedsearch://ESCU - Splunk Digital Certificates Infrastructure Version - Rule]
|
||||
type = detection
|
||||
asset_type = Endpoint
|
||||
confidence = medium
|
||||
explanation = This search will check the TLS validation is properly configured on the search head it is run from as well as its search peers after Splunk version 9. Other components such as additional search heads or anything this rest command cannot be distributed to will need to be manually checked.
|
||||
how_to_implement = The user running this search is required to have a permission allowing them to dispatch REST requests to indexers (the `dispatch_rest_to_indexers` capability) in some architectures. Splunk SOAR customers can find a SOAR workbook that walks an analyst through the process of running these hunting searches in the references list of this detection. In order to use this workbook, a user will need to run a curl command to post the file to their SOAR instance such as "curl -u username:password https://soar.instance.name/rest/rest/workbook_template -d @splunk_psa_0622.json". A user should then create an empty container or case, attach the workbook, and begin working through the tasks.
|
||||
annotations = {"cis20": ["CIS 3", "CIS 5", "CIS 16"], "kill_chain_phases": ["Exploitation"], "mitre_attack": ["T1587.003"], "nist": ["DE.CM"]}
|
||||
known_false_positives = No known at this time.
|
||||
providing_technologies = []
|
||||
|
||||
[savedsearch://ESCU - Splunk Digital Certificates Lack of Encryption - Rule]
|
||||
type = detection
|
||||
asset_type = endpoint
|
||||
confidence = medium
|
||||
explanation = On June 14th, 2022, Splunk released a security advisory relating to the authentication that happens between Universal Forwarders and Deployment Servers. In some circumstances, an unauthenticated client can download forwarder bundles from the Deployment Server. In other circumstances, a client may be allowed to publish a forwarder bundle to other clients, which may allow for arbitrary code execution. The fixes for these require upgrading to at least Splunk 9.0 on the forwarder as well. This is a great opportunity to configure TLS across the environment. This search looks for forwarders that are not using TLS and adds risk to those entities.
|
||||
how_to_implement = This anomaly search looks for forwarder connections that are not currently using TLS. It then presents the source IP, the type of forwarder, and the version of the forwarder. You can also remove the "ssl=false" argument from the initial stanza in order to get a full list of all your forwarders that are sending data, and the version of Splunk software they are running, for audit purposes. Splunk SOAR customers can find a SOAR workbook that walks an analyst through the process of running these hunting searches in the references list of this detection. In order to use this workbook, a user will need to run a curl command to post the file to their SOAR instance such as "curl -u username:password https://soar.instance.name/rest/rest/workbook_template -d @splunk_psa_0622.json". A user should then create an empty container or case, attach the workbook, and begin working through the tasks.
|
||||
annotations = {"cis20": ["CIS 3", "CIS 5", "CIS 16"], "kill_chain_phases": ["Exploitation"], "mitre_attack": ["T1587.003"], "nist": ["DE.CM"]}
|
||||
known_false_positives = None at this time
|
||||
providing_technologies = []
|
||||
|
||||
[savedsearch://ESCU - Splunk DoS via Malformed S2S Request - Rule]
|
||||
type = detection
|
||||
asset_type = Endpoint
|
||||
@@ -27,6 +77,46 @@ annotations = {"cis20": ["CIS 3", "CIS 5", "CIS 16"], "kill_chain_phases": ["Exp
|
||||
known_false_positives = None.
|
||||
providing_technologies = []
|
||||
|
||||
[savedsearch://ESCU - Splunk Process Injection Forwarder Bundle Downloads - Rule]
|
||||
type = detection
|
||||
asset_type = Endpoint
|
||||
confidence = medium
|
||||
explanation = On June 14th, 2022, Splunk released a security advisory relating to the authentication that happens between Universal Forwarders and Deployment Servers. In some circumstances, an unauthenticated client can download forwarder bundles from the Deployment Server. This hunting search pulls a full list of forwarder bundle downloads where the peer column is the forwarder, the host column is the Deployment Server, and then you have a list of the apps downloaded and the serverclasses in which the peer is a member of. You should look for apps or clients that you do not recognize as being part of your environment.
|
||||
how_to_implement = This hunting search uses native logs produced when a deployment server is within your environment. Splunk SOAR customers can find a SOAR workbook that walks an analyst through the process of running these hunting searches in the references list of this detection. In order to use this workbook, a user will need to run a curl command to post the file to their SOAR instance such as "curl -u username:password https://soar.instance.name/rest/rest/workbook_template -d @splunk_psa_0622.json". A user should then create an empty container or case, attach the workbook, and begin working through the tasks.
|
||||
annotations = {"cis20": ["CIS 3", "CIS 5", "CIS 16"], "kill_chain_phases": ["Exploitation"], "mitre_attack": ["T1055"], "nist": ["DE.CM"]}
|
||||
known_false_positives = None at this time.
|
||||
providing_technologies = []
|
||||
|
||||
[savedsearch://ESCU - Splunk Protocol Impersonation Weak Encryption Configuration - Rule]
|
||||
type = detection
|
||||
asset_type = Endpoint
|
||||
confidence = medium
|
||||
explanation = On June 14th, 2022, Splunk released a security advisory relating to TLS validation occuring within the httplib and urllib python libraries shipped with Splunk. In addition to upgrading to Splunk Enterprise 9.0 or later, several configuration settings need to be set. This search will check those configurations on the search head it is run from as well as its search peers. In addition to these settings, the PYTHONHTTPSVERIFY setting in $SPLUNK_HOME/etc/splunk-launch.conf needs to be enabled as well. Other components such as additional search heads or anything this rest command cannot be distributed to will need to be manually checked.
|
||||
how_to_implement = The user running this search is required to have a permission allowing them to dispatch REST requests to indexers (The `dispatch_rest_to_indexers` capability). Splunk SOAR customers can find a SOAR workbook that walks an analyst through the process of running these hunting searches in the references list of this detection. In order to use this workbook, a user will need to run a curl command to post the file to their SOAR instance such as "curl -u username:password https://soar.instance.name/rest/rest/workbook_template -d @splunk_psa_0622.json". A user should then create an empty container or case, attach the workbook, and begin working through the tasks.
|
||||
annotations = {"cis20": ["CIS 3", "CIS 5", "CIS 16"], "kill_chain_phases": ["Exploitation"], "mitre_attack": ["T1001.003"], "nist": ["DE.CM"]}
|
||||
known_false_positives = While all of the settings on each device returned by this search may appear to be hardened, you will still need to verify the value of PYTHONHTTPSVERIFY in $SPLUNK_HOME/etc/splunk-launch.conf on each device in order to harden the python configuration.
|
||||
providing_technologies = []
|
||||
|
||||
[savedsearch://ESCU - Splunk protocol impersonation weak encryption selfsigned - Rule]
|
||||
type = detection
|
||||
asset_type = Endpoint
|
||||
confidence = medium
|
||||
explanation = On June 14th 2022, Splunk released vulnerability advisory addresing Python TLS validation which was not set before Splunk version 9. This search displays events showing WARNING of using Splunk issued default selfsigned certificates.
|
||||
how_to_implement = Must upgrade to Splunk version 9 and Configure TLS in order to apply this search. Splunk SOAR customers can find a SOAR workbook that walks an analyst through the process of running these hunting searches in the references list of this detection. In order to use this workbook, a user will need to run a curl command to post the file to their SOAR instance such as "curl -u username:password https://soar.instance.name/rest/rest/workbook_template -d @splunk_psa_0622.json". A user should then create an empty container or case, attach the workbook, and begin working through the tasks.
|
||||
annotations = {"cis20": ["CIS 3", "CIS 5", "CIS 16"], "kill_chain_phases": ["Exploitation"], "mitre_attack": ["T1588.004"], "nist": ["DE.CM"]}
|
||||
known_false_positives = This searches finds self signed certificates issued by Splunk which are not recommended from Splunk version 9 forward.
|
||||
providing_technologies = []
|
||||
|
||||
[savedsearch://ESCU - Splunk protocol impersonation weak encryption simplerequest - Rule]
|
||||
type = detection
|
||||
asset_type = Endpoint
|
||||
confidence = medium
|
||||
explanation = On Splunk version 9 on Python3 client libraries verify server certificates by default and use CA certificate store. This search warns a user about a failure to validate a certificate using python3 request.
|
||||
how_to_implement = Must upgrade to Splunk version 9 and Configure TLS host name validation for Splunk Python modules in order to apply this search. Splunk SOAR customers can find a SOAR workbook that walks an analyst through the process of running these hunting searches in the references list of this detection. In order to use this workbook, a user will need to run a curl command to post the file to their SOAR instance such as "curl -u username:password https://soar.instance.name/rest/rest/workbook_template -d @splunk_psa_0622.json". A user should then create an empty container or case, attach the workbook, and begin working through the tasks.
|
||||
annotations = {"cis20": ["CIS 3", "CIS 5", "CIS 16"], "kill_chain_phases": ["Exploitation"], "mitre_attack": ["T1588.004"], "nist": ["DE.CM"]}
|
||||
known_false_positives = This search tries to address validation of server and client certificates within Splunk infrastructure, it might produce results from accidental or unintended requests to port 8089.
|
||||
providing_technologies = []
|
||||
|
||||
[savedsearch://ESCU - Splunk User Enumeration Attempt - Rule]
|
||||
type = detection
|
||||
asset_type = endpoint
|
||||
@@ -4008,7 +4098,7 @@ providing_technologies = []
|
||||
type = detection
|
||||
asset_type = Endpoint
|
||||
confidence = medium
|
||||
explanation = The following analytic identifies the process java writing a .jsp to disk. This is potentially indicative of a web shell being written to disk.
|
||||
explanation = The following analytic identifies the process java writing a .jsp to disk. This is potentially indicative of a web shell being written to disk. Modify and tune the analytic based on data ingested. For instance, it may be worth running a broad query for jsp file writes first before performing a join.
|
||||
how_to_implement = To successfully implement this search you need to be ingesting information on process that include the name of the process responsible for the changes from your endpoints into the `Endpoint` datamodel in the `Processes` and `Filesystem` node. In addition, confirm the latest CIM App 4.20 or higher is installed and the latest TA for the endpoint product.
|
||||
annotations = {"cis20": ["CIS 3", "CIS 5", "CIS 16"], "kill_chain_phases": ["Exploitation"], "mitre_attack": ["T1190"], "nist": ["DE.CM"]}
|
||||
known_false_positives = False positives are possible and filtering may be required. Restrict by assets or filter known jsp files that are common for the environment.
|
||||
@@ -4150,7 +4240,7 @@ asset_type = Endpoint
|
||||
confidence = medium
|
||||
explanation = The following analytic identifies a suspicious process creation of At application. This process can be used by malware, adversaries and red teamers to create persistence entry to the targeted or compromised host with their malicious code. This anomaly detection can be a good indicator to investigate the event before and after this process execution, when it was executed and what schedule task it will execute.
|
||||
how_to_implement = To successfully implement this search, you need to be ingesting logs with the process name, parent process, and command-line executions from your endpoints. If you are using Sysmon, you can use the Add-on for Linux Sysmon from Splunkbase.
|
||||
annotations = {"cis20": ["CIS 3", "CIS 5", "CIS 16"], "kill_chain_phases": ["Exploitation"], "mitre_attack": ["T1053.001", "T1053"], "nist": ["DE.CM"]}
|
||||
annotations = {"cis20": ["CIS 3", "CIS 5", "CIS 16"], "kill_chain_phases": ["Exploitation"], "mitre_attack": ["T1053.002", "T1053"], "nist": ["DE.CM"]}
|
||||
known_false_positives = Administrator or network operator can use this application for automation purposes. Please update the filter macros to remove false positives.
|
||||
providing_technologies = []
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -4430,7 +4520,7 @@ asset_type = Endpoint
|
||||
confidence = medium
|
||||
explanation = This analytic looks for suspicious commandline that may use to append user entry to /etc/at.allow or /etc/at.deny. These 2 files are commonly abused by malware, adversaries or red teamers to persist on the targeted or compromised host. These config file can restrict user that can only execute at application (another schedule task application in linux). attacker can create a user or add the compromised username to that config file to execute at to schedule it malicious code. This anomaly detection can be a good indicator to investigate further the entry in created config file and who created it to verify if it is a false positive.
|
||||
how_to_implement = To successfully implement this search, you need to be ingesting logs with the process name, parent process, and command-line executions from your endpoints. If you are using Sysmon, you can use the Add-on for Linux Sysmon from Splunkbase.
|
||||
annotations = {"cis20": ["CIS 3", "CIS 5", "CIS 16"], "kill_chain_phases": ["Exploitation"], "mitre_attack": ["T1053.001", "T1053"], "nist": ["DE.CM"]}
|
||||
annotations = {"cis20": ["CIS 3", "CIS 5", "CIS 16"], "kill_chain_phases": ["Exploitation"], "mitre_attack": ["T1053.002", "T1053"], "nist": ["DE.CM"]}
|
||||
known_false_positives = Administrator or network operator can use this commandline for automation purposes. Please update the filter macros to remove false positives.
|
||||
providing_technologies = []
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -4660,7 +4750,7 @@ asset_type = Endpoint
|
||||
confidence = medium
|
||||
explanation = Detect usage of plutil to modify plist files. Adversaries can modiy plist files to executed binaries or add command line arguments. Plist files in auto-run locations are executed upon user logon or system startup.
|
||||
how_to_implement = This detection uses osquery and endpoint security on MacOS. Follow the link in references, which describes how to setup process auditing in MacOS with endpoint security and osquery.
|
||||
annotations = {"cis20": ["CIS 3", "CIS 5", "CIS 16"], "kill_chain_phases": ["Actions on Objectives"], "mitre_attack": ["T1547.011"], "nist": ["DE.CM"]}
|
||||
annotations = {"cis20": ["CIS 3", "CIS 5", "CIS 16"], "kill_chain_phases": ["Actions on Objectives"], "mitre_attack": ["T1647"], "nist": ["DE.CM"]}
|
||||
known_false_positives = Administrators using plutil to change plist files.
|
||||
providing_technologies = []
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -6815,12 +6905,12 @@ providing_technologies = []
|
||||
|
||||
[savedsearch://ESCU - Unload Sysmon Filter Driver - Rule]
|
||||
type = detection
|
||||
asset_type =
|
||||
asset_type = Endpoint
|
||||
confidence = medium
|
||||
explanation = Attackers often disable security tools to avoid detection. This search looks for the usage of process `fltMC.exe` to unload a Sysmon Driver that will stop sysmon from collecting the data.
|
||||
how_to_implement = You must be ingesting data that records process activity from your hosts to populate the Endpoint data model in the Processes node. You must also be ingesting logs with both the process name and command line from your endpoints. The command-line arguments are mapped to the "process" field in the Endpoint data model. This search is also shipped with `unload_sysmon_filter_driver_filter` macro, update this macro to filter out false positives.
|
||||
annotations = {"cis20": ["CIS 8"], "kill_chain_phases": ["Actions on Objectives"], "mitre_attack": ["T1562.001", "T1562"], "nist": ["DE.CM"]}
|
||||
known_false_positives =
|
||||
known_false_positives = Unknown at the moment
|
||||
providing_technologies = []
|
||||
|
||||
[savedsearch://ESCU - Unloading AMSI via Reflection - Rule]
|
||||
@@ -6976,6 +7066,26 @@ annotations = {"cis20": ["CIS 8"], "kill_chain_phases": ["Exploitation"], "mitre
|
||||
known_false_positives = administrators rarely use adfind, usually not used for legitimate reasons
|
||||
providing_technologies = []
|
||||
|
||||
[savedsearch://ESCU - Windows Command and Scripting Interpreter Hunting Path Traversal - Rule]
|
||||
type = detection
|
||||
asset_type = Endpoint
|
||||
confidence = medium
|
||||
explanation = The following analytic identifies path traversal command-line execution and should be used to tune and driver other more higher fidelity analytics. This technique was seen in malicious document that execute malicious code using msdt.exe and path traversal technique that serve as defense evasion. This Hunting query is a good pivot to look for possible suspicious process and command-line that runs execute path traversal technique to run malicious code. This may help you to find possible downloaded malware or other lolbin execution.
|
||||
how_to_implement = To successfully implement this search you need to be ingesting information on process that include the name of the process responsible for the changes from your endpoints into the `Endpoint` datamodel in the `Processes` node. In addition, confirm the latest CIM App 4.20 or higher is installed and the latest TA for the endpoint product
|
||||
annotations = {"cis20": ["CIS 3", "CIS 5", "CIS 16"], "kill_chain_phases": ["Exploitation"], "mitre_attack": ["T1059"], "nist": ["DE.CM"]}
|
||||
known_false_positives = false positive may vary depends on the score you want to check. The bigger number of path traversal string count the better.
|
||||
providing_technologies = []
|
||||
|
||||
[savedsearch://ESCU - Windows Command and Scripting Interpreter Path Traversal Exec - Rule]
|
||||
type = detection
|
||||
asset_type = Endpoint
|
||||
confidence = medium
|
||||
explanation = The following analytic identifies path traversal command-line execution. This technique was seen in malicious document that execute malicious code using msdt.exe and path traversal technique that serve as defense evasion. This TTP is a good pivot to look for more suspicious process and command-line that runs before and after this execution. This may help you to find possible downloaded malware or other lolbin execution.
|
||||
how_to_implement = To successfully implement this search you need to be ingesting information on process that include the name of the process responsible for the changes from your endpoints into the `Endpoint` datamodel in the `Processes` node. In addition, confirm the latest CIM App 4.20 or higher is installed and the latest TA for the endpoint product
|
||||
annotations = {"cis20": ["CIS 3", "CIS 5", "CIS 16"], "kill_chain_phases": ["Exploitation"], "mitre_attack": ["T1059"], "nist": ["DE.CM"]}
|
||||
known_false_positives = Not known at this moment.
|
||||
providing_technologies = []
|
||||
|
||||
[savedsearch://ESCU - Windows Computer Account Created by Computer Account - Rule]
|
||||
type = detection
|
||||
asset_type = Endpoint
|
||||
@@ -7235,6 +7345,16 @@ annotations = {"cis20": ["CIS 3", "CIS 5", "CIS 16"], "kill_chain_phases": ["Exp
|
||||
known_false_positives = Unknown
|
||||
providing_technologies = []
|
||||
|
||||
[savedsearch://ESCU - Windows Execute Arbitrary Commands with MSDT - Rule]
|
||||
type = detection
|
||||
asset_type = Endpoint
|
||||
confidence = medium
|
||||
explanation = The following analytic identifies a recently disclosed arbitraty command execution using Windows msdt.exe - a Diagnostics Troubleshooting Wizard. The sample identified will use the ms-msdt:/ protocol handler to load msdt.exe to retrieve a remote payload. During triage, review file modifications for html. Identify parallel process execution that may be related, including an Office Product.
|
||||
how_to_implement = To successfully implement this search you need to be ingesting information on process that include the name of the process responsible for the changes from your endpoints into the `Endpoint` datamodel in the `Processes` node. In addition, confirm the latest CIM App 4.20 or higher is installed and the latest TA for the endpoint product.
|
||||
annotations = {"cis20": ["CIS 3", "CIS 5", "CIS 16"], "kill_chain_phases": ["Exploitation"], "mitre_attack": ["T1218"], "nist": ["DE.CM"]}
|
||||
known_false_positives = False positives may be present, filter as needed. Added .xml to potentially capture any answer file usage. Remove as needed.
|
||||
providing_technologies = []
|
||||
|
||||
[savedsearch://ESCU - Windows File Without Extension In Critical Folder - Rule]
|
||||
type = detection
|
||||
asset_type = Endpoint
|
||||
@@ -7485,6 +7605,16 @@ annotations = {"kill_chain_phases": ["Actions on Objectives"], "mitre_attack": [
|
||||
known_false_positives = False positives will occur based on legitimate application requests, filter based on source image as needed.
|
||||
providing_technologies = []
|
||||
|
||||
[savedsearch://ESCU - Windows Office Product Spawning MSDT - Rule]
|
||||
type = detection
|
||||
asset_type = Endpoint
|
||||
confidence = medium
|
||||
explanation = The following analytic identifies a Microsoft Office product spawning the Windows msdt.exe process. MSDT is a Diagnostics Troubleshooting Wizard native to Windows. This behavior is related to a recently identified sample utilizing protocol handlers to evade preventative controls, including if macros are disabled in the document. During triage, review file modifications for html. In addition, parallel processes including PowerShell and CertUtil.
|
||||
how_to_implement = how To successfully implement this search you need to be ingesting information on process that include the name of the process responsible for the changes from your endpoints into the `Endpoint` datamodel in the `Processes` node. In addition, confirm the latest CIM App 4.20 or higher is installed and the latest TA for the endpoint product.
|
||||
annotations = {"cis20": ["CIS 3", "CIS 5", "CIS 16"], "kill_chain_phases": ["Exploitation"], "mitre_attack": ["T1566", "T1566.001"], "nist": ["DE.CM"]}
|
||||
known_false_positives = False positives should be limited, however filter as needed.
|
||||
providing_technologies = []
|
||||
|
||||
[savedsearch://ESCU - Windows Possible Credential Dumping - Rule]
|
||||
type = detection
|
||||
asset_type = Endpoint
|
||||
@@ -9059,6 +9189,26 @@ annotations = {"kill_chain_phases": ["Exploitation"], "mitre_attack": ["T1048.00
|
||||
known_false_positives = unknown
|
||||
providing_technologies = []
|
||||
|
||||
[savedsearch://ESCU - Splunk Identified SSL TLS Certificates - Rule]
|
||||
type = detection
|
||||
asset_type = Proxy
|
||||
confidence = medium
|
||||
explanation = The following analytic uses tags of SSL, TLS and certificate to identify the usage of the Splunk default certificates being utilized in the environment. Recommended guidance is to utilize valid TLS certificates which documentation may be found in Splunk Docs - https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/8.2.6/Security/AboutsecuringyourSplunkconfigurationwithSSL.
|
||||
how_to_implement = Ingestion of SSL/TLS data is needed and to be tagged properly as ssl, tls or certificate. This data may come from a proxy, zeek, or Splunk Streams. Splunk SOAR customers can find a SOAR workbook that walks an analyst through the process of running these hunting searches in the references list of this detection. In order to use this workbook, a user will need to run a curl command to post the file to their SOAR instance such as "curl -u username:password https://soar.instance.name/rest/rest/workbook_template -d @splunk_psa_0622.json". A user should then create an empty container or case, attach the workbook, and begin working through the tasks.
|
||||
annotations = {"cis20": ["CIS 3", "CIS 5", "CIS 16"], "kill_chain_phases": ["Reconnaissance"], "mitre_attack": ["T1040"], "nist": ["DE.CM"]}
|
||||
known_false_positives = False positives will not be present as it is meant to assist with identifying default certificates being utilized.
|
||||
providing_technologies = []
|
||||
|
||||
[savedsearch://ESCU - Confluence Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution CVE-2022-26134 - Rule]
|
||||
type = detection
|
||||
asset_type = Web Server
|
||||
confidence = medium
|
||||
explanation = The following analytic assists with identifying CVE-2022-26134 based exploitation utilizing the Web datamodel to cover network and CIM compliant web logs. The parameters were captured from live scanning and the POC provided by Rapid7. This analytic is written against multiple proof of concept codes released and seen in the wild (scanning). During triage, review any endpoint based logs for further activity including writing a jsp file to disk and commands/processes spawning running as root from the Confluence process.
|
||||
how_to_implement = This detection requires the Web datamodel to be populated from a supported Technology Add-On like Splunk for Apache or Splunk for Nginx. In addition, network based logs or event data like PAN Threat.
|
||||
annotations = {"cis20": ["CIS 3", "CIS 5", "CIS 16"], "kill_chain_phases": ["Exploitation"], "mitre_attack": ["T1505", "T1190"], "nist": ["DE.CM"]}
|
||||
known_false_positives = Tune based on assets if possible, or restrict to known Confluence servers. Remove the ${ for a more broad query. To identify more exec, remove everything up to the last parameter (Runtime().exec) for a broad query.
|
||||
providing_technologies = []
|
||||
|
||||
[savedsearch://ESCU - Log4Shell JNDI Payload Injection Attempt - Rule]
|
||||
type = detection
|
||||
asset_type = Endpoint
|
||||
@@ -9251,6 +9401,17 @@ searches = ["ESCU - Detect Unauthorized Assets by MAC address - Rule", "ESCU - G
|
||||
description = Keep a careful inventory of every asset on your network to make it easier to detect rogue devices. Unauthorized/unmanaged devices could be an indication of malicious behavior that should be investigated further.
|
||||
narrative = This Analytic Story is designed to help you develop a better understanding of what authorized and unauthorized devices are part of your enterprise. This story can help you better categorize and classify assets, providing critical business context and awareness of their assets during an incident. Information derived from this Analytic Story can be used to better inform and support other analytic stories. For successful detection, you will need to leverage the Assets and Identity Framework from Enterprise Security to populate your known assets.
|
||||
|
||||
[analytic_story://Atlassian Confluence Server and Data Center CVE-2022-26134]
|
||||
category = Adversary Tactics
|
||||
last_updated = 2022-06-03
|
||||
version = 1
|
||||
references = ["https://confluence.atlassian.com/doc/confluence-security-advisory-2022-06-02-1130377146.html", "https://www.splunk.com/en_us/blog/security/atlassian-confluence-vulnerability-cve-2022-26134.html", "https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/2022/06/02/active-exploitation-of-confluence-cve-2022-26134/", "https://www.volexity.com/blog/2022/06/02/zero-day-exploitation-of-atlassian-confluence/"]
|
||||
maintainers = [{"company": "Splunk", "email": "-", "name": "Michael Haag"}]
|
||||
spec_version = 3
|
||||
searches = ["ESCU - Java Writing JSP File - Rule", "ESCU - Confluence Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution CVE-2022-26134 - Rule"]
|
||||
description = On June 2, security researchers at Volexity published a blog outlining the discovery of an unauthenticated remote code execution zero day vulnerability (CVE-2022-26134) being actively exploited in Atlassian Confluence Server and Data Center instances in the wild. Atlassian released a fix within 24 hours of the blog''s release.
|
||||
narrative = Atlassian describes the vulnerability as an Object-Graph Navigation Language (OGNL) injection allowing an unauthenticated user to execute arbitrary code on a Confluence Server or Data Server instance. Volexity did not release proof-of-concept (POC) exploit code, but researchers there have observed coordinated, widespread exploitation. Volexity first discovered the vulnerability over the weekend on two Internet-facing web servers running Confluence Server software. The investigation was due to suspicious activity on the hosts, including JSP webshells that were written to disk.
|
||||
|
||||
[analytic_story://AWS Cross Account Activity]
|
||||
category = Cloud Security
|
||||
last_updated = 2018-06-04
|
||||
@@ -10089,6 +10250,17 @@ description = CVE-2021-40444 is a remote code execution vulnerability in MSHTML,
|
||||
narrative = Microsoft is aware of targeted attacks that attempt to exploit this vulnerability, CVE-2021-40444 by using specially-crafted Microsoft Office documents. MSHTML is a software component used to render web pages on Windows. Although it is 2019s most commonly associated with Internet Explorer, it is also used in other software. CVE-2021-40444 received a CVSS score of 8.8 out of 10. MSHTML is the beating heart of Internet Explorer, the vulnerability also exists in that browser. Although given its limited use, there is little risk of infection by that vector. Microsoft Office applications use the MSHTML component to display web content in Office documents. The attack depends on MSHTML loading a specially crafted ActiveX control when the target opens a malicious Office document. The loaded ActiveX control can then run arbitrary code to infect the system with more malware. At the moment all supported Windows versions are vulnerable. Since there is no patch available yet, Microsoft proposes a few methods to block these attacks. \
|
||||
1. Disable the installation of all ActiveX controls in Internet Explorer via the registry. Previously-installed ActiveX controls will still run, but no new ones will be added, including malicious ones. Open documents from the Internet in Protected View or Application Guard for Office, both of which prevent the current attack. This is a default setting but it may have been changed.
|
||||
|
||||
[analytic_story://Microsoft Support Diagnostic Tool Vulnerability CVE-2022-30190]
|
||||
category = Adversary Tactics
|
||||
last_updated = 2022-05-31
|
||||
version = 1
|
||||
references = ["https://msrc-blog.microsoft.com/2022/05/30/guidance-for-cve-2022-30190-microsoft-support-diagnostic-tool-vulnerability/", "https://isc.sans.edu/diary/rss/28694", "https://doublepulsar.com/follina-a-microsoft-office-code-execution-vulnerability-1a47fce5629e", "https://twitter.com/nao_sec/status/1530196847679401984?s=20\u0026t=ZiXYI4dQuA-0_dzQzSUb3A", "https://app.any.run/tasks/713f05d2-fe78-4b9d-a744-f7c133e3fafb/", "https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/4a24048f81afbe9fb62e7a6a49adbd1faf41f266b5f9feecdceb567aec096784/detection", "https://strontic.github.io/xcyclopedia/library/msdt.exe-152D4C9F63EFB332CCB134C6953C0104.html"]
|
||||
maintainers = [{"company": "Teoderick Contreras, Splunk", "email": "-", "name": "Michael Haag"}]
|
||||
spec_version = 3
|
||||
searches = ["ESCU - Windows Command and Scripting Interpreter Hunting Path Traversal - Rule", "ESCU - Windows Command and Scripting Interpreter Path Traversal Exec - Rule", "ESCU - Windows Execute Arbitrary Commands with MSDT - Rule", "ESCU - Windows Office Product Spawning MSDT - Rule"]
|
||||
description = On Monday May 30, 2022, Microsoft issued CVE-2022-30190 regarding the Microsoft Support Diagnostic Tool (MSDT) in Windows vulnerability.
|
||||
narrative = A remote code execution vulnerability exists when MSDT is called using the URL protocol from a calling application such as Word. An attacker who successfully exploits this vulnerability can run arbitrary code with the privileges of the calling application. The attacker can then install programs, view, change, or delete data, or create new accounts in the context allowed by the user''s rights.
|
||||
|
||||
[analytic_story://Monitor for Updates]
|
||||
category = Best Practices
|
||||
last_updated = 2017-09-15
|
||||
@@ -10397,7 +10569,7 @@ version = 1
|
||||
references = ["https://www.fireeye.com/blog/threat-research/2019/04/spear-phishing-campaign-targets-ukraine-government.html"]
|
||||
maintainers = [{"company": "Splunk", "email": "-", "name": "Splunk Research Team"}]
|
||||
spec_version = 3
|
||||
searches = ["ESCU - Excel Spawning PowerShell - Rule", "ESCU - Excel Spawning Windows Script Host - Rule", "ESCU - MSHTML Module Load in Office Product - Rule", "ESCU - Office Application Spawn rundll32 process - Rule", "ESCU - Office Document Creating Schedule Task - Rule", "ESCU - Office Document Executing Macro Code - Rule", "ESCU - Office Document Spawned Child Process To Download - Rule", "ESCU - Office Product Spawning BITSAdmin - Rule", "ESCU - Office Product Spawning CertUtil - Rule", "ESCU - Office Product Spawning MSHTA - Rule", "ESCU - Office Product Spawning Rundll32 with no DLL - Rule", "ESCU - Office Product Spawning Wmic - Rule", "ESCU - Office Product Writing cab or inf - Rule", "ESCU - Office Spawning Control - Rule", "ESCU - Process Creating LNK file in Suspicious Location - Rule", "ESCU - Windows ISO LNK File Creation - Rule", "ESCU - Winword Spawning Cmd - Rule", "ESCU - Winword Spawning PowerShell - Rule", "ESCU - Gdrive suspicious file sharing - Rule", "ESCU - Gsuite suspicious calendar invite - Rule", "ESCU - Detect Outlook exe writing a zip file - Rule"]
|
||||
searches = ["ESCU - Excel Spawning PowerShell - Rule", "ESCU - Excel Spawning Windows Script Host - Rule", "ESCU - MSHTML Module Load in Office Product - Rule", "ESCU - Office Application Spawn rundll32 process - Rule", "ESCU - Office Document Creating Schedule Task - Rule", "ESCU - Office Document Executing Macro Code - Rule", "ESCU - Office Document Spawned Child Process To Download - Rule", "ESCU - Office Product Spawning BITSAdmin - Rule", "ESCU - Office Product Spawning CertUtil - Rule", "ESCU - Office Product Spawning MSHTA - Rule", "ESCU - Office Product Spawning Rundll32 with no DLL - Rule", "ESCU - Office Product Spawning Wmic - Rule", "ESCU - Office Product Writing cab or inf - Rule", "ESCU - Office Spawning Control - Rule", "ESCU - Process Creating LNK file in Suspicious Location - Rule", "ESCU - Windows ISO LNK File Creation - Rule", "ESCU - Windows Office Product Spawning MSDT - Rule", "ESCU - Winword Spawning Cmd - Rule", "ESCU - Winword Spawning PowerShell - Rule", "ESCU - Gdrive suspicious file sharing - Rule", "ESCU - Gsuite suspicious calendar invite - Rule", "ESCU - Detect Outlook exe writing a zip file - Rule"]
|
||||
description = Detect signs of malicious payloads that may indicate that your environment has been breached via a phishing attack.
|
||||
narrative = Despite its simplicity, phishing remains the most pervasive and dangerous cyberthreat. In fact, research shows that as many as [91% of all successful attacks](https://digitalguardian.com/blog/91-percent-cyber-attacks-start-phishing-email-heres-how-protect-against-phishing) are initiated via a phishing email. \
|
||||
As most people know, these emails use fraudulent domains, [email scraping](https://www.cyberscoop.com/emotet-trojan-phishing-scraping-templates-cofense-geodo/), familiar contact names inserted as senders, and other tactics to lure targets into clicking a malicious link, opening an attachment with a [nefarious payload](https://www.cyberscoop.com/emotet-trojan-phishing-scraping-templates-cofense-geodo/), or entering sensitive personal information that perpetrators may intercept. This attack technique requires a relatively low level of skill and allows adversaries to easily cast a wide net. Worse, because its success relies on the gullibility of humans, it's impossible to completely "automate" it out of your environment. However, you can use ES and ESCU to detect and investigate potentially malicious payloads injected into your environment subsequent to a phishing attack. \
|
||||
@@ -10415,7 +10587,7 @@ version = 1
|
||||
references = ["https://www.splunk.com/en_us/product-security/announcements.html"]
|
||||
maintainers = [{"company": "Splunk", "email": "-", "name": "Lou Stella"}]
|
||||
spec_version = 3
|
||||
searches = ["ESCU - Path traversal SPL injection - Rule", "ESCU - Splunk DoS via Malformed S2S Request - Rule", "ESCU - Splunk User Enumeration Attempt - Rule", "ESCU - Splunk XSS in Monitoring Console - Rule", "ESCU - Open Redirect in Splunk Web - Rule", "ESCU - Splunk Enterprise Information Disclosure - Rule"]
|
||||
searches = ["ESCU - Path traversal SPL injection - Rule", "ESCU - Splunk Command and Scripting Interpreter Delete Usage - Rule", "ESCU - Splunk Command and Scripting Interpreter Risky Commands - Rule", "ESCU - Splunk Command and Scripting Interpreter Risky SPL MLTK - Rule", "ESCU - Splunk Digital Certificates Infrastructure Version - Rule", "ESCU - Splunk Digital Certificates Lack of Encryption - Rule", "ESCU - Splunk DoS via Malformed S2S Request - Rule", "ESCU - Splunk Protocol Impersonation Weak Encryption Configuration - Rule", "ESCU - Splunk protocol impersonation weak encryption selfsigned - Rule", "ESCU - Splunk protocol impersonation weak encryption simplerequest - Rule", "ESCU - Splunk User Enumeration Attempt - Rule", "ESCU - Splunk XSS in Monitoring Console - Rule", "ESCU - Open Redirect in Splunk Web - Rule", "ESCU - Splunk Enterprise Information Disclosure - Rule", "ESCU - Splunk Identified SSL TLS Certificates - Rule"]
|
||||
description = Keeping your Splunk Enterprise deployment up to date is critical and will help you reduce the risk associated with vulnerabilities in the product.
|
||||
narrative = This analytic story includes detections that focus on attacker behavior targeted at your Splunk environment directly.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -10800,7 +10972,7 @@ version = 1
|
||||
references = ["https://attack.mitre.org/wiki/Defense_Evasion"]
|
||||
maintainers = [{"company": "Splunk", "email": "-", "name": "David Dorsey"}]
|
||||
spec_version = 3
|
||||
searches = ["ESCU - Reg exe used to hide files directories via registry keys - Rule", "ESCU - Remote Registry Key modifications - Rule", "ESCU - Add or Set Windows Defender Exclusion - Rule", "ESCU - CSC Net On The Fly Compilation - Rule", "ESCU - Disable Registry Tool - Rule", "ESCU - Disable Security Logs Using MiniNt Registry - Rule", "ESCU - Disable Show Hidden Files - Rule", "ESCU - Disable UAC Remote Restriction - Rule", "ESCU - Disable Windows Behavior Monitoring - Rule", "ESCU - Disable Windows SmartScreen Protection - Rule", "ESCU - Disabling CMD Application - Rule", "ESCU - Disabling ControlPanel - Rule", "ESCU - Disabling Firewall with Netsh - Rule", "ESCU - Disabling FolderOptions Windows Feature - Rule", "ESCU - Disabling NoRun Windows App - Rule", "ESCU - Disabling Remote User Account Control - Rule", "ESCU - Disabling SystemRestore In Registry - Rule", "ESCU - Disabling Task Manager - Rule", "ESCU - Eventvwr UAC Bypass - Rule", "ESCU - Excessive number of service control start as disabled - Rule", "ESCU - Firewall Allowed Program Enable - Rule", "ESCU - FodHelper UAC Bypass - Rule", "ESCU - Hiding Files And Directories With Attrib exe - Rule", "ESCU - NET Profiler UAC bypass - Rule", "ESCU - Powershell Windows Defender Exclusion Commands - Rule", "ESCU - Sdclt UAC Bypass - Rule", "ESCU - SilentCleanup UAC Bypass - Rule", "ESCU - SLUI RunAs Elevated - Rule", "ESCU - SLUI Spawning a Process - Rule", "ESCU - Suspicious Reg exe Process - Rule", "ESCU - UAC Bypass MMC Load Unsigned Dll - Rule", "ESCU - Windows Defender Exclusion Registry Entry - Rule", "ESCU - Windows Disable Change Password Through Registry - Rule", "ESCU - Windows Disable Lock Workstation Feature Through Registry - Rule", "ESCU - Windows Disable Notification Center - Rule", "ESCU - Windows Disable Windows Group Policy Features Through Registry - Rule", "ESCU - Windows DisableAntiSpyware Registry - Rule", "ESCU - Windows DISM Remove Defender - Rule", "ESCU - Windows Event For Service Disabled - Rule", "ESCU - Windows Excessive Disabled Services Event - Rule", "ESCU - Windows Hide Notification Features Through Registry - Rule", "ESCU - Windows Modify Show Compress Color And Info Tip Registry - Rule", "ESCU - Windows Process With NamedPipe CommandLine - Rule", "ESCU - Windows Rasautou DLL Execution - Rule", "ESCU - WSReset UAC Bypass - Rule", "ESCU - Get Notable History - Response Task", "ESCU - Get Parent Process Info - Response Task", "ESCU - Get Process Info - Response Task"]
|
||||
searches = ["ESCU - Reg exe used to hide files directories via registry keys - Rule", "ESCU - Remote Registry Key modifications - Rule", "ESCU - Add or Set Windows Defender Exclusion - Rule", "ESCU - CSC Net On The Fly Compilation - Rule", "ESCU - Disable Registry Tool - Rule", "ESCU - Disable Security Logs Using MiniNt Registry - Rule", "ESCU - Disable Show Hidden Files - Rule", "ESCU - Disable UAC Remote Restriction - Rule", "ESCU - Disable Windows Behavior Monitoring - Rule", "ESCU - Disable Windows SmartScreen Protection - Rule", "ESCU - Disabling CMD Application - Rule", "ESCU - Disabling ControlPanel - Rule", "ESCU - Disabling Firewall with Netsh - Rule", "ESCU - Disabling FolderOptions Windows Feature - Rule", "ESCU - Disabling NoRun Windows App - Rule", "ESCU - Disabling Remote User Account Control - Rule", "ESCU - Disabling SystemRestore In Registry - Rule", "ESCU - Disabling Task Manager - Rule", "ESCU - Eventvwr UAC Bypass - Rule", "ESCU - Excessive number of service control start as disabled - Rule", "ESCU - Firewall Allowed Program Enable - Rule", "ESCU - FodHelper UAC Bypass - Rule", "ESCU - Hiding Files And Directories With Attrib exe - Rule", "ESCU - NET Profiler UAC bypass - Rule", "ESCU - Powershell Windows Defender Exclusion Commands - Rule", "ESCU - Sdclt UAC Bypass - Rule", "ESCU - SilentCleanup UAC Bypass - Rule", "ESCU - SLUI RunAs Elevated - Rule", "ESCU - SLUI Spawning a Process - Rule", "ESCU - Suspicious Reg exe Process - Rule", "ESCU - UAC Bypass MMC Load Unsigned Dll - Rule", "ESCU - Windows Command and Scripting Interpreter Hunting Path Traversal - Rule", "ESCU - Windows Command and Scripting Interpreter Path Traversal Exec - Rule", "ESCU - Windows Defender Exclusion Registry Entry - Rule", "ESCU - Windows Disable Change Password Through Registry - Rule", "ESCU - Windows Disable Lock Workstation Feature Through Registry - Rule", "ESCU - Windows Disable Notification Center - Rule", "ESCU - Windows Disable Windows Group Policy Features Through Registry - Rule", "ESCU - Windows DisableAntiSpyware Registry - Rule", "ESCU - Windows DISM Remove Defender - Rule", "ESCU - Windows Event For Service Disabled - Rule", "ESCU - Windows Excessive Disabled Services Event - Rule", "ESCU - Windows Hide Notification Features Through Registry - Rule", "ESCU - Windows Modify Show Compress Color And Info Tip Registry - Rule", "ESCU - Windows Process With NamedPipe CommandLine - Rule", "ESCU - Windows Rasautou DLL Execution - Rule", "ESCU - WSReset UAC Bypass - Rule", "ESCU - Get Notable History - Response Task", "ESCU - Get Parent Process Info - Response Task", "ESCU - Get Process Info - Response Task"]
|
||||
description = Detect tactics used by malware to evade defenses on Windows endpoints. A few of these include suspicious `reg.exe` processes, files hidden with `attrib.exe` and disabling user-account control, among many others
|
||||
narrative = Defense evasion is a tactic--identified in the MITRE ATT&CK framework--that adversaries employ in a variety of ways to bypass or defeat defensive security measures. There are many techniques enumerated by the MITRE ATT&CK framework that are applicable in this context. This Analytic Story includes searches designed to identify the use of such techniques on Windows platforms.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -10827,7 +10999,7 @@ description = Uncover activity consistent with CVE-2020-1350, or SIGRed. Discove
|
||||
narrative = When a client requests a DNS record for a particular domain, that request gets routed first through the client's locally configured DNS server, then to any DNS server(s) configured as forwarders, and then onto the target domain's own DNS server(s). If a attacker wanted to, they could host a malicious DNS server that responds to the initial request with a specially crafted large response (~65KB). This response would flow through to the client's local DNS server, which if not patched for CVE-2020-1350, would cause the buffer overflow. The detection searches in this Analytic Story use wire data to detect the malicious behavior. Searches for Splunk Stream and Zeek are included. The Splunk Stream search correlates across stream:dns and stream:tcp, while the Zeek search correlates across bro:dns:json and bro:conn:json. These correlations are required to pick up both the DNS record types (SIG and KEY) along with the payload size (>65KB).
|
||||
|
||||
[analytic_story://Windows Drivers]
|
||||
category =
|
||||
category = Adversary Tactics
|
||||
last_updated = 2022-03-30
|
||||
version = 1
|
||||
references = ["https://redcanary.com/blog/tracking-driver-inventory-to-expose-rootkits/", "https://www.trendmicro.com/en_us/research/22/e/avoslocker-ransomware-variant-abuses-driver-file-to-disable-anti-Virus-scans-log4shell.html", "https://symantec-enterprise-blogs.security.com/blogs/threat-intelligence/daxin-backdoor-espionage", "https://media.kasperskycontenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/43/2018/03/08064459/Equation_group_questions_and_answers.pdf", "https://www.welivesecurity.com/2022/01/11/signed-kernel-drivers-unguarded-gateway-windows-core/"]
|
||||
|
||||
Vendored
+2
-2
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
|
||||
is_configured = false
|
||||
state = enabled
|
||||
state_change_requires_restart = false
|
||||
build = 7910
|
||||
build = 8305
|
||||
|
||||
[triggers]
|
||||
reload.analytic_stories = simple
|
||||
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ reload.es_investigations = simple
|
||||
|
||||
[launcher]
|
||||
author = Splunk
|
||||
version = 3.40.0
|
||||
version = 3.43.0
|
||||
description = Explore the Analytic Stories included with ES Content Updates.
|
||||
|
||||
[ui]
|
||||
|
||||
Vendored
+1
-1
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
||||
#############
|
||||
# Automatically generated by generator.py in splunk/security_content
|
||||
# On Date: 2022-05-23T20:35:38 UTC
|
||||
# On Date: 2022-06-14T13:52:57 UTC
|
||||
# Author: Splunk Security Research
|
||||
# Contact: research@splunk.com
|
||||
#############
|
||||
|
||||
+1
-1
@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
|
||||
[content-version]
|
||||
version = 3.40.0
|
||||
version = 3.43.0
|
||||
|
||||
+1
-1
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
||||
#############
|
||||
# Automatically generated by generator.py in splunk/security_content
|
||||
# On Date: 2022-05-23T20:35:38 UTC
|
||||
# On Date: 2022-06-14T13:52:57 UTC
|
||||
# Author: Splunk Security Research
|
||||
# Contact: research@splunk.com
|
||||
#############
|
||||
|
||||
Vendored
+67
-3
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
||||
#############
|
||||
# Automatically generated by generator.py in splunk/security_content
|
||||
# On Date: 2022-05-23T20:35:38 UTC
|
||||
# On Date: 2022-06-14T13:52:57 UTC
|
||||
# Author: Splunk Security Research
|
||||
# Contact: research@splunk.com
|
||||
#############
|
||||
@@ -9,10 +9,46 @@
|
||||
definition = search *
|
||||
description = Update this macro to limit the output results to filter out false positives.
|
||||
|
||||
[splunk_command_and_scripting_interpreter_delete_usage_filter]
|
||||
definition = search *
|
||||
description = Update this macro to limit the output results to filter out false positives.
|
||||
|
||||
[splunk_command_and_scripting_interpreter_risky_commands_filter]
|
||||
definition = search *
|
||||
description = Update this macro to limit the output results to filter out false positives.
|
||||
|
||||
[splunk_command_and_scripting_interpreter_risky_spl_mltk_filter]
|
||||
definition = search *
|
||||
description = Update this macro to limit the output results to filter out false positives.
|
||||
|
||||
[splunk_digital_certificates_infrastructure_version_filter]
|
||||
definition = search *
|
||||
description = Update this macro to limit the output results to filter out false positives.
|
||||
|
||||
[splunk_digital_certificates_lack_of_encryption_filter]
|
||||
definition = search *
|
||||
description = Update this macro to limit the output results to filter out false positives.
|
||||
|
||||
[splunk_dos_via_malformed_s2s_request_filter]
|
||||
definition = search *
|
||||
description = Update this macro to limit the output results to filter out false positives.
|
||||
|
||||
[splunk_process_injection_forwarder_bundle_downloads_filter]
|
||||
definition = search *
|
||||
description = Update this macro to limit the output results to filter out false positives.
|
||||
|
||||
[splunk_protocol_impersonation_weak_encryption_configuration_filter]
|
||||
definition = search *
|
||||
description = Update this macro to limit the output results to filter out false positives.
|
||||
|
||||
[splunk_protocol_impersonation_weak_encryption_selfsigned_filter]
|
||||
definition = search *
|
||||
description = Update this macro to limit the output results to filter out false positives.
|
||||
|
||||
[splunk_protocol_impersonation_weak_encryption_simplerequest_filter]
|
||||
definition = search *
|
||||
description = Update this macro to limit the output results to filter out false positives.
|
||||
|
||||
[splunk_user_enumeration_attempt_filter]
|
||||
definition = search *
|
||||
description = Update this macro to limit the output results to filter out false positives.
|
||||
@@ -2733,6 +2769,14 @@ description = Update this macro to limit the output results to filter out false
|
||||
definition = search *
|
||||
description = Update this macro to limit the output results to filter out false positives.
|
||||
|
||||
[windows_command_and_scripting_interpreter_hunting_path_traversal_filter]
|
||||
definition = search *
|
||||
description = Update this macro to limit the output results to filter out false positives.
|
||||
|
||||
[windows_command_and_scripting_interpreter_path_traversal_exec_filter]
|
||||
definition = search *
|
||||
description = Update this macro to limit the output results to filter out false positives.
|
||||
|
||||
[windows_computer_account_created_by_computer_account_filter]
|
||||
definition = search *
|
||||
description = Update this macro to limit the output results to filter out false positives.
|
||||
@@ -2833,6 +2877,10 @@ description = Update this macro to limit the output results to filter out false
|
||||
definition = search *
|
||||
description = Update this macro to limit the output results to filter out false positives.
|
||||
|
||||
[windows_execute_arbitrary_commands_with_msdt_filter]
|
||||
definition = search *
|
||||
description = Update this macro to limit the output results to filter out false positives.
|
||||
|
||||
[windows_file_without_extension_in_critical_folder_filter]
|
||||
definition = search *
|
||||
description = Update this macro to limit the output results to filter out false positives.
|
||||
@@ -2925,6 +2973,10 @@ description = Update this macro to limit the output results to filter out false
|
||||
definition = search *
|
||||
description = Update this macro to limit the output results to filter out false positives.
|
||||
|
||||
[windows_office_product_spawning_msdt_filter]
|
||||
definition = search *
|
||||
description = Update this macro to limit the output results to filter out false positives.
|
||||
|
||||
[windows_possible_credential_dumping_filter]
|
||||
definition = search *
|
||||
description = Update this macro to limit the output results to filter out false positives.
|
||||
@@ -3529,6 +3581,14 @@ description = Update this macro to limit the output results to filter out false
|
||||
definition = search *
|
||||
description = Update this macro to limit the output results to filter out false positives.
|
||||
|
||||
[splunk_identified_ssl_tls_certificates_filter]
|
||||
definition = search *
|
||||
description = Update this macro to limit the output results to filter out false positives.
|
||||
|
||||
[confluence_unauthenticated_remote_code_execution_cve_2022_26134_filter]
|
||||
definition = search *
|
||||
description = Update this macro to limit the output results to filter out false positives.
|
||||
|
||||
[log4shell_jndi_payload_injection_attempt_filter]
|
||||
definition = search *
|
||||
description = Update this macro to limit the output results to filter out false positives.
|
||||
@@ -3843,7 +3903,7 @@ definition = "-70m@m"
|
||||
description = Use this macro to determine how far back you should be checking for new provisioning activities
|
||||
|
||||
[printservice]
|
||||
definition = source="wineventlog:microsoft-windows-printservice/operational" OR sourcetype="WinEventLog:Microsoft-Windows-PrintService/Admin"
|
||||
definition = source="wineventlog:microsoft-windows-printservice/operational" OR source="WinEventLog:Microsoft-Windows-PrintService/Admin"
|
||||
description = customer specific splunk configurations(eg- index, source, sourcetype). Replace the macro definition with configurations for your Splunk Environmnent.
|
||||
|
||||
[process_bitsadmin]
|
||||
@@ -4051,12 +4111,16 @@ description = This macro is a list of AWS event names associated with security g
|
||||
definition = index=signals
|
||||
description = customer specific splunk configurations(eg- index, source, sourcetype). Replace the macro definition with configurations for your Splunk Environmnent.
|
||||
|
||||
[splunk_python]
|
||||
definition = index=_internal sourcetype=splunk_python
|
||||
description = customer specific splunk configurations(eg- index, source, sourcetype). Replace the macro definition with configurations for your Splunk Environmnent.
|
||||
|
||||
[splunkd]
|
||||
definition = index=_internal sourcetype=splunkd
|
||||
description = customer specific splunk configurations(eg- index, source, sourcetype). Replace the macro definition with configurations for your Splunk Environmnent.
|
||||
|
||||
[splunkd_failed_auths]
|
||||
definition = index=_audit action="login attempt" info="failed"
|
||||
definition = index=_audit "action=login attempt" "info=failed"
|
||||
description = customer specific splunk configurations(eg- index, source, sourcetype). Replace the macro definition with configurations for your Splunk Environmnent.
|
||||
|
||||
[splunkd_web]
|
||||
|
||||
Vendored
+688
-42
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
||||
#############
|
||||
# Automatically generated by generator.py in splunk/security_content
|
||||
# On Date: 2022-05-23T20:35:38 UTC
|
||||
# On Date: 2022-06-14T13:52:57 UTC
|
||||
# Author: Splunk Security Research
|
||||
# Contact: research@splunk.com
|
||||
#############
|
||||
@@ -52,6 +52,206 @@ realtime_schedule = 0
|
||||
is_visible = false
|
||||
search = `path_traversal_spl_injection` | search "\/..\/..\/..\/..\/..\/..\/..\/..\/..\/" | stats count by status clientip method uri_path uri_query | `path_traversal_spl_injection_filter`
|
||||
|
||||
[ESCU - Splunk Command and Scripting Interpreter Delete Usage - Rule]
|
||||
action.escu = 0
|
||||
action.escu.enabled = 1
|
||||
description = The following analytic identifies the use of the risky command - Delete - that may be utilized in Splunk to delete some or all data queried for. In order to use Delete in Splunk, one must be assigned the role. This is typically not used and should generate an anomaly if it is used.
|
||||
action.escu.mappings = {"cis20": ["CIS 3", "CIS 5", "CIS 16"], "kill_chain_phases": ["Actions on Objectives"], "mitre_attack": ["T1059"], "nist": ["DE.CM"]}
|
||||
action.escu.data_models = ["Splunk_Audit"]
|
||||
action.escu.eli5 = The following analytic identifies the use of the risky command - Delete - that may be utilized in Splunk to delete some or all data queried for. In order to use Delete in Splunk, one must be assigned the role. This is typically not used and should generate an anomaly if it is used.
|
||||
action.escu.how_to_implement = To successfully implement this search acceleration is recommended against the Search_Activity datamodel that runs against the splunk _audit index. In addition, this analytic requires the Common Information Model App which includes the Splunk Audit Datamodel https://splunkbase.splunk.com/app/1621/.
|
||||
action.escu.known_false_positives = False positives may be present if this command is used as a common practice. Filter as needed.
|
||||
action.escu.creation_date = 2022-05-27
|
||||
action.escu.modification_date = 2022-05-27
|
||||
action.escu.confidence = high
|
||||
action.escu.full_search_name = ESCU - Splunk Command and Scripting Interpreter Delete Usage - Rule
|
||||
action.escu.search_type = detection
|
||||
action.escu.product = ["Splunk Enterprise", "Splunk Enterprise Security", "Splunk Cloud"]
|
||||
action.escu.providing_technologies = []
|
||||
action.escu.analytic_story = ["Splunk Vulnerabilities"]
|
||||
action.risk = 1
|
||||
action.risk.param._risk_message = $user$ executed the 'delete' command, if this is unexpected it should be reviewed.
|
||||
action.risk.param._risk = [{"risk_object_field": "user", "risk_object_type": "user", "risk_score": 27}]
|
||||
action.risk.param._risk_score = 0
|
||||
action.risk.param.verbose = 0
|
||||
cron_schedule = 0 * * * *
|
||||
dispatch.earliest_time = -70m@m
|
||||
dispatch.latest_time = -10m@m
|
||||
action.correlationsearch.enabled = 1
|
||||
action.correlationsearch.label = ESCU - Splunk Command and Scripting Interpreter Delete Usage - Rule
|
||||
action.correlationsearch.annotations = {"analytic_story": ["Splunk Vulnerabilities"], "cis20": ["CIS 3", "CIS 5", "CIS 16"], "confidence": 30, "context": ["Source:Endpoint"], "cve": ["CVE-2022-32154"], "impact": 90, "kill_chain_phases": ["Actions on Objectives"], "mitre_attack": ["T1059"], "nist": ["DE.CM"], "observable": [{"name": "user", "role": ["Victim"], "type": "User"}]}
|
||||
schedule_window = auto
|
||||
alert.digest_mode = 1
|
||||
disabled = true
|
||||
enableSched = 1
|
||||
allow_skew = 100%
|
||||
counttype = number of events
|
||||
relation = greater than
|
||||
quantity = 0
|
||||
realtime_schedule = 0
|
||||
is_visible = false
|
||||
search = | tstats `security_content_summariesonly` count min(_time) as firstTime max(_time) as lastTime from datamodel=Splunk_Audit.Search_Activity where Search_Activity.search IN ("*| delete*") Search_Activity.search_type=adhoc Search_Activity.user!=splunk-system-user by Search_Activity.search Search_Activity.info Search_Activity.total_run_time Search_Activity.user Search_Activity.search_type | `drop_dm_object_name(Search_Activity)` | `security_content_ctime(firstTime)` | `security_content_ctime(lastTime)` | `splunk_command_and_scripting_interpreter_delete_usage_filter`
|
||||
|
||||
[ESCU - Splunk Command and Scripting Interpreter Risky Commands - Rule]
|
||||
action.escu = 0
|
||||
action.escu.enabled = 1
|
||||
description = The Splunk platform contains built-in search processing language (SPL) safeguards to warn you when you are about to unknowingly run a search that contains commands that might be a security risk. This warning appears when you click a link or type a URL that loads a search that contains risky commands. The warning does not appear when you create ad hoc searches. This warning alerts you to the possibility of unauthorized actions by a malicious user. Unauthorized actions include - Copying or transferring data (data exfiltration), Deleting data and Overwriting data. All risky commands may be found here https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/latest/Security/SPLsafeguards#Commands_that_trigger_the_warninga. A possible scenario when this might occur is when a malicious actor creates a search that includes commands that exfiltrate or damage data. The malicious actor then sends an unsuspecting user a link to the search. The URL contains a query string (q) and a search identifier (sid), but the sid is not valid. The malicious actor hopes the user will use the link and the search will run. During analysis, pivot based on user name and filter any user or queries not needed. Queries ran from a dashboard are seen as adhoc queries. When a query runs from a dashboard it will not show in audittrail logs the source dashboard name. The query defaults to adhoc and no Splunk system user activity. In addition, modify this query by removing key commands that generate too much noise, or too little, and create separate queries with higher confidence to alert on.
|
||||
action.escu.mappings = {"cis20": ["CIS 3", "CIS 5", "CIS 16"], "kill_chain_phases": ["Actions on Objectives"], "mitre_attack": ["T1059"], "nist": ["DE.CM"]}
|
||||
action.escu.data_models = ["Splunk_Audit"]
|
||||
action.escu.eli5 = The Splunk platform contains built-in search processing language (SPL) safeguards to warn you when you are about to unknowingly run a search that contains commands that might be a security risk. This warning appears when you click a link or type a URL that loads a search that contains risky commands. The warning does not appear when you create ad hoc searches. This warning alerts you to the possibility of unauthorized actions by a malicious user. Unauthorized actions include - Copying or transferring data (data exfiltration), Deleting data and Overwriting data. All risky commands may be found here https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/latest/Security/SPLsafeguards#Commands_that_trigger_the_warninga. A possible scenario when this might occur is when a malicious actor creates a search that includes commands that exfiltrate or damage data. The malicious actor then sends an unsuspecting user a link to the search. The URL contains a query string (q) and a search identifier (sid), but the sid is not valid. The malicious actor hopes the user will use the link and the search will run. During analysis, pivot based on user name and filter any user or queries not needed. Queries ran from a dashboard are seen as adhoc queries. When a query runs from a dashboard it will not show in audittrail logs the source dashboard name. The query defaults to adhoc and no Splunk system user activity. In addition, modify this query by removing key commands that generate too much noise, or too little, and create separate queries with higher confidence to alert on.
|
||||
action.escu.how_to_implement = To successfully implement this search acceleration is recommended against the Search_Activity datamodel that runs against the splunk _audit index. In addition, this analytic requires the Common Information Model App which includes the Splunk Audit Datamodel https://splunkbase.splunk.com/app/1621/. Splunk SOAR customers can find a SOAR workbook that walks an analyst through the process of running these hunting searches in the references list of this detection. In order to use this workbook, a user will need to run a curl command to post the file to their SOAR instance such as "curl -u username:password https://soar.instance.name/rest/rest/workbook_template -d @splunk_psa_0622.json". A user should then create an empty container or case, attach the workbook, and begin working through the tasks.
|
||||
action.escu.known_false_positives = False positives will be present until properly filtered by Username and search name.
|
||||
action.escu.creation_date = 2022-05-23
|
||||
action.escu.modification_date = 2022-05-23
|
||||
action.escu.confidence = high
|
||||
action.escu.full_search_name = ESCU - Splunk Command and Scripting Interpreter Risky Commands - Rule
|
||||
action.escu.search_type = detection
|
||||
action.escu.product = ["Splunk Enterprise", "Splunk Enterprise Security", "Splunk Cloud"]
|
||||
action.escu.providing_technologies = []
|
||||
action.escu.analytic_story = ["Splunk Vulnerabilities"]
|
||||
action.risk = 1
|
||||
action.risk.param._risk_message = A risky Splunk command has ran by $user$ and should be reviewed.
|
||||
action.risk.param._risk = [{"risk_object_field": "user", "risk_object_type": "user", "risk_score": 20}]
|
||||
action.risk.param._risk_score = 0
|
||||
action.risk.param.verbose = 0
|
||||
cron_schedule = 0 * * * *
|
||||
dispatch.earliest_time = -70m@m
|
||||
dispatch.latest_time = -10m@m
|
||||
action.correlationsearch.enabled = 1
|
||||
action.correlationsearch.label = ESCU - Splunk Command and Scripting Interpreter Risky Commands - Rule
|
||||
action.correlationsearch.annotations = {"analytic_story": ["Splunk Vulnerabilities"], "cis20": ["CIS 3", "CIS 5", "CIS 16"], "confidence": 40, "context": ["Source:Endpoint"], "cve": ["CVE-2022-32154"], "impact": 50, "kill_chain_phases": ["Actions on Objectives"], "mitre_attack": ["T1059"], "nist": ["DE.CM"], "observable": [{"name": "user", "role": ["Victim"], "type": "User"}]}
|
||||
schedule_window = auto
|
||||
alert.digest_mode = 1
|
||||
disabled = true
|
||||
enableSched = 1
|
||||
allow_skew = 100%
|
||||
counttype = number of events
|
||||
relation = greater than
|
||||
quantity = 0
|
||||
realtime_schedule = 0
|
||||
is_visible = false
|
||||
search = | tstats `security_content_summariesonly` count min(_time) as firstTime max(_time) as lastTime from datamodel=Splunk_Audit.Search_Activity where Search_Activity.search IN ("*| runshellscript *", "*| collect *","*| delete *", "*| fit *", "*| outputcsv *", "*| outputlookup *", "*| run *", "*| script *", "*| sendalert *", "*| sendemail *", "*| tscolle*") Search_Activity.search_type=adhoc Search_Activity.user!=splunk-system-user by Search_Activity.search Search_Activity.info Search_Activity.total_run_time Search_Activity.user Search_Activity.search_type | `drop_dm_object_name(Search_Activity)` | `security_content_ctime(firstTime)` | `security_content_ctime(lastTime)` | `splunk_command_and_scripting_interpreter_risky_commands_filter`
|
||||
|
||||
[ESCU - Splunk Command and Scripting Interpreter Risky SPL MLTK - Rule]
|
||||
action.escu = 0
|
||||
action.escu.enabled = 1
|
||||
description = This detection utilizes machine learning model named "risky_command_abuse" trained from "Splunk Command and Scripting Interpreter Risky SPL MLTK Baseline". It should be scheduled to run hourly to detect whether a user has run searches containing risky SPL from this list https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/latest/Security/SPLsafeguards#Commands_that_trigger_the_warninga with abnormally long running time in the past one hour, comparing with his/her past seven days history. This search uses the trained baseline to infer whether a search is an outlier (isOutlier ~= 1.0) or not (isOutlier~= 0.0)
|
||||
action.escu.mappings = {"cis20": ["CIS 3", "CIS 6"], "kill_chain_phases": ["Actions on Objectives"], "mitre_attack": ["T1059"], "nist": ["DE.AE"]}
|
||||
action.escu.data_models = ["Splunk_Audit"]
|
||||
action.escu.eli5 = This detection utilizes machine learning model named "risky_command_abuse" trained from "Splunk Command and Scripting Interpreter Risky SPL MLTK Baseline". It should be scheduled to run hourly to detect whether a user has run searches containing risky SPL from this list https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/latest/Security/SPLsafeguards#Commands_that_trigger_the_warninga with abnormally long running time in the past one hour, comparing with his/her past seven days history. This search uses the trained baseline to infer whether a search is an outlier (isOutlier ~= 1.0) or not (isOutlier~= 0.0)
|
||||
action.escu.how_to_implement = This detection depends on MLTK app which can be found here - https://splunkbase.splunk.com/app/2890/ and the Splunk Audit datamodel which can be found here - https://splunkbase.splunk.com/app/1621/. Baseline model needs to be built using "Splunk Command and Scripting Interpreter Risky SPL MLTK Baseline" before this search can run. Please note that the current search only finds matches exactly one space between separator bar and risky commands.
|
||||
action.escu.known_false_positives = If the run time of a search exceeds the boundaries of outlier defined by the fitted density function model, false positives can occur, incorrectly labeling a long running search as potentially risky.
|
||||
action.escu.creation_date = 2022-05-27
|
||||
action.escu.modification_date = 2022-05-27
|
||||
action.escu.confidence = high
|
||||
action.escu.full_search_name = ESCU - Splunk Command and Scripting Interpreter Risky SPL MLTK - Rule
|
||||
action.escu.search_type = detection
|
||||
action.escu.product = ["Splunk Enterprise", "Splunk Enterprise Security", "Splunk Cloud"]
|
||||
action.escu.providing_technologies = []
|
||||
action.escu.analytic_story = ["Splunk Vulnerabilities"]
|
||||
action.risk = 1
|
||||
action.risk.param._risk_message = Abnormally long run time for risk SPL command seen by user $(Search_Activity.user).
|
||||
action.risk.param._risk = [{"risk_object_field": "user", "risk_object_type": "user", "risk_score": 20}]
|
||||
action.risk.param._risk_score = 0
|
||||
action.risk.param.verbose = 0
|
||||
cron_schedule = 0 * * * *
|
||||
dispatch.earliest_time = -70m@m
|
||||
dispatch.latest_time = -10m@m
|
||||
action.correlationsearch.enabled = 1
|
||||
action.correlationsearch.label = ESCU - Splunk Command and Scripting Interpreter Risky SPL MLTK - Rule
|
||||
action.correlationsearch.annotations = {"analytic_story": ["Splunk Vulnerabilities"], "cis20": ["CIS 3", "CIS 6"], "confidence": 40, "context": ["Source:Endpoint"], "cve": ["CVE-2022-32154"], "impact": 50, "kill_chain_phases": ["Actions on Objectives"], "mitre_attack": ["T1059"], "nist": ["DE.AE"], "observable": [{"name": "user", "role": ["Victim"], "type": "User"}]}
|
||||
schedule_window = auto
|
||||
alert.digest_mode = 1
|
||||
disabled = true
|
||||
enableSched = 1
|
||||
allow_skew = 100%
|
||||
counttype = number of events
|
||||
relation = greater than
|
||||
quantity = 0
|
||||
realtime_schedule = 0
|
||||
is_visible = false
|
||||
search = | tstats sum(Search_Activity.total_run_time) AS run_time, values(Search_Activity.search) as searches, count FROM datamodel=Splunk_Audit.Search_Activity WHERE (Search_Activity.user!="") AND (Search_Activity.total_run_time>1) AND (earliest=-1h@h latest=now) AND (Search_Activity.search IN ("*| runshellscript *", "*| collect *","*| delete *", "*| fit *", "*| outputcsv *", "*| outputlookup *", "*| run *", "*| script *", "*| sendalert *", "*| sendemail *", "*| tscolle*")) AND (Search_Activity.search_type=adhoc) AND (Search_Activity.user!=splunk-system-user) BY _time, Search_Activity.user span=1h | apply risky_command_abuse | fields _time, Search_Activity.user, searches, run_time, IsOutlier(run_time) | rename IsOutlier(run_time) as isOutlier, _time as timestamp | where isOutlier>0.5 | `splunk_command_and_scripting_interpreter_risky_spl_mltk_filter`
|
||||
|
||||
[ESCU - Splunk Digital Certificates Infrastructure Version - Rule]
|
||||
action.escu = 0
|
||||
action.escu.enabled = 1
|
||||
description = This search will check the TLS validation is properly configured on the search head it is run from as well as its search peers after Splunk version 9. Other components such as additional search heads or anything this rest command cannot be distributed to will need to be manually checked.
|
||||
action.escu.mappings = {"cis20": ["CIS 3", "CIS 5", "CIS 16"], "kill_chain_phases": ["Exploitation"], "mitre_attack": ["T1587.003"], "nist": ["DE.CM"]}
|
||||
action.escu.data_models = []
|
||||
action.escu.eli5 = This search will check the TLS validation is properly configured on the search head it is run from as well as its search peers after Splunk version 9. Other components such as additional search heads or anything this rest command cannot be distributed to will need to be manually checked.
|
||||
action.escu.how_to_implement = The user running this search is required to have a permission allowing them to dispatch REST requests to indexers (the `dispatch_rest_to_indexers` capability) in some architectures. Splunk SOAR customers can find a SOAR workbook that walks an analyst through the process of running these hunting searches in the references list of this detection. In order to use this workbook, a user will need to run a curl command to post the file to their SOAR instance such as "curl -u username:password https://soar.instance.name/rest/rest/workbook_template -d @splunk_psa_0622.json". A user should then create an empty container or case, attach the workbook, and begin working through the tasks.
|
||||
action.escu.known_false_positives = No known at this time.
|
||||
action.escu.creation_date = 2022-05-26
|
||||
action.escu.modification_date = 2022-05-26
|
||||
action.escu.confidence = high
|
||||
action.escu.full_search_name = ESCU - Splunk Digital Certificates Infrastructure Version - Rule
|
||||
action.escu.search_type = detection
|
||||
action.escu.product = ["Splunk Enterprise", "Splunk Enterprise Security", "Splunk Cloud"]
|
||||
action.escu.providing_technologies = []
|
||||
action.escu.analytic_story = ["Splunk Vulnerabilities"]
|
||||
action.risk = 1
|
||||
action.risk.param._risk_message = $splunk_server$ may not be properly validating TLS Certificates
|
||||
action.risk.param._risk = [{"risk_object_field": "splunk_server", "risk_object_type": "system", "risk_score": 50}]
|
||||
action.risk.param._risk_score = 0
|
||||
action.risk.param.verbose = 0
|
||||
cron_schedule = 0 * * * *
|
||||
dispatch.earliest_time = -70m@m
|
||||
dispatch.latest_time = -10m@m
|
||||
action.correlationsearch.enabled = 1
|
||||
action.correlationsearch.label = ESCU - Splunk Digital Certificates Infrastructure Version - Rule
|
||||
action.correlationsearch.annotations = {"analytic_story": ["Splunk Vulnerabilities"], "cis20": ["CIS 3", "CIS 5", "CIS 16"], "confidence": 100, "context": ["Source:Endpoint"], "cve": ["CVE-2022-32153"], "impact": 50, "kill_chain_phases": ["Exploitation"], "mitre_attack": ["T1587.003"], "nist": ["DE.CM"], "observable": [{"name": "splunk_server", "role": ["Victim"], "type": "Hostname"}]}
|
||||
schedule_window = auto
|
||||
alert.digest_mode = 1
|
||||
disabled = true
|
||||
enableSched = 1
|
||||
allow_skew = 100%
|
||||
counttype = number of events
|
||||
relation = greater than
|
||||
quantity = 0
|
||||
realtime_schedule = 0
|
||||
is_visible = false
|
||||
search = | rest /services/server/info | table splunk_server version server_roles | join splunk_server [| rest /servicesNS/nobody/search/configs/conf-server/ search="sslConfig"| table splunk_server sslVerifyServerCert sslVerifyServerName serverCert] | fillnull value="Not Set" | rename sslVerifyServerCert as "Server.conf:SslConfig:sslVerifyServerCert", sslVerifyServerName as "Server.conf:SslConfig:sslVerifyServerName", serverCert as "Server.conf:SslConfig:serverCert" | `splunk_digital_certificates_infrastructure_version_filter`
|
||||
|
||||
[ESCU - Splunk Digital Certificates Lack of Encryption - Rule]
|
||||
action.escu = 0
|
||||
action.escu.enabled = 1
|
||||
description = On June 14th, 2022, Splunk released a security advisory relating to the authentication that happens between Universal Forwarders and Deployment Servers. In some circumstances, an unauthenticated client can download forwarder bundles from the Deployment Server. In other circumstances, a client may be allowed to publish a forwarder bundle to other clients, which may allow for arbitrary code execution. The fixes for these require upgrading to at least Splunk 9.0 on the forwarder as well. This is a great opportunity to configure TLS across the environment. This search looks for forwarders that are not using TLS and adds risk to those entities.
|
||||
action.escu.mappings = {"cis20": ["CIS 3", "CIS 5", "CIS 16"], "kill_chain_phases": ["Exploitation"], "mitre_attack": ["T1587.003"], "nist": ["DE.CM"]}
|
||||
action.escu.data_models = []
|
||||
action.escu.eli5 = On June 14th, 2022, Splunk released a security advisory relating to the authentication that happens between Universal Forwarders and Deployment Servers. In some circumstances, an unauthenticated client can download forwarder bundles from the Deployment Server. In other circumstances, a client may be allowed to publish a forwarder bundle to other clients, which may allow for arbitrary code execution. The fixes for these require upgrading to at least Splunk 9.0 on the forwarder as well. This is a great opportunity to configure TLS across the environment. This search looks for forwarders that are not using TLS and adds risk to those entities.
|
||||
action.escu.how_to_implement = This anomaly search looks for forwarder connections that are not currently using TLS. It then presents the source IP, the type of forwarder, and the version of the forwarder. You can also remove the "ssl=false" argument from the initial stanza in order to get a full list of all your forwarders that are sending data, and the version of Splunk software they are running, for audit purposes. Splunk SOAR customers can find a SOAR workbook that walks an analyst through the process of running these hunting searches in the references list of this detection. In order to use this workbook, a user will need to run a curl command to post the file to their SOAR instance such as "curl -u username:password https://soar.instance.name/rest/rest/workbook_template -d @splunk_psa_0622.json". A user should then create an empty container or case, attach the workbook, and begin working through the tasks.
|
||||
action.escu.known_false_positives = None at this time
|
||||
action.escu.creation_date = 2022-05-26
|
||||
action.escu.modification_date = 2022-05-26
|
||||
action.escu.confidence = high
|
||||
action.escu.full_search_name = ESCU - Splunk Digital Certificates Lack of Encryption - Rule
|
||||
action.escu.search_type = detection
|
||||
action.escu.product = ["Splunk Enterprise", "Splunk Enterprise Security", "Splunk Cloud"]
|
||||
action.escu.providing_technologies = []
|
||||
action.escu.analytic_story = ["Splunk Vulnerabilities"]
|
||||
action.risk = 1
|
||||
action.risk.param._risk_message = $hostname$ is not using TLS when forwarding data
|
||||
action.risk.param._risk = [{"risk_object_field": "hostname", "risk_object_type": "system", "risk_score": 20}]
|
||||
action.risk.param._risk_score = 0
|
||||
action.risk.param.verbose = 0
|
||||
cron_schedule = 0 * * * *
|
||||
dispatch.earliest_time = -70m@m
|
||||
dispatch.latest_time = -10m@m
|
||||
action.correlationsearch.enabled = 1
|
||||
action.correlationsearch.label = ESCU - Splunk Digital Certificates Lack of Encryption - Rule
|
||||
action.correlationsearch.annotations = {"analytic_story": ["Splunk Vulnerabilities"], "cis20": ["CIS 3", "CIS 5", "CIS 16"], "confidence": 80, "context": ["Source:Endpoint"], "cve": ["CVE-2022-32151"], "impact": 25, "kill_chain_phases": ["Exploitation"], "mitre_attack": ["T1587.003"], "nist": ["DE.CM"], "observable": [{"name": "hostname", "role": ["Victim"], "type": "Hostname"}]}
|
||||
schedule_window = auto
|
||||
alert.digest_mode = 1
|
||||
disabled = true
|
||||
enableSched = 1
|
||||
allow_skew = 100%
|
||||
counttype = number of events
|
||||
relation = greater than
|
||||
quantity = 0
|
||||
realtime_schedule = 0
|
||||
is_visible = false
|
||||
search = `splunkd` group="tcpin_connections" ssl="false" | stats values(sourceIp) latest(fwdType) latest(version) by hostname | `splunk_digital_certificates_lack_of_encryption_filter`
|
||||
|
||||
[ESCU - Splunk DoS via Malformed S2S Request - Rule]
|
||||
action.escu = 0
|
||||
action.escu.enabled = 1
|
||||
@@ -98,6 +298,166 @@ realtime_schedule = 0
|
||||
is_visible = false
|
||||
search = `splunkd` log_level="ERROR" component="TcpInputProc" thread_name="FwdDataReceiverThread" "Invalid _meta atom" | table host, src | `splunk_dos_via_malformed_s2s_request_filter`
|
||||
|
||||
[ESCU - Splunk Process Injection Forwarder Bundle Downloads - Rule]
|
||||
action.escu = 0
|
||||
action.escu.enabled = 1
|
||||
description = On June 14th, 2022, Splunk released a security advisory relating to the authentication that happens between Universal Forwarders and Deployment Servers. In some circumstances, an unauthenticated client can download forwarder bundles from the Deployment Server. This hunting search pulls a full list of forwarder bundle downloads where the peer column is the forwarder, the host column is the Deployment Server, and then you have a list of the apps downloaded and the serverclasses in which the peer is a member of. You should look for apps or clients that you do not recognize as being part of your environment.
|
||||
action.escu.mappings = {"cis20": ["CIS 3", "CIS 5", "CIS 16"], "kill_chain_phases": ["Exploitation"], "mitre_attack": ["T1055"], "nist": ["DE.CM"]}
|
||||
action.escu.data_models = []
|
||||
action.escu.eli5 = On June 14th, 2022, Splunk released a security advisory relating to the authentication that happens between Universal Forwarders and Deployment Servers. In some circumstances, an unauthenticated client can download forwarder bundles from the Deployment Server. This hunting search pulls a full list of forwarder bundle downloads where the peer column is the forwarder, the host column is the Deployment Server, and then you have a list of the apps downloaded and the serverclasses in which the peer is a member of. You should look for apps or clients that you do not recognize as being part of your environment.
|
||||
action.escu.how_to_implement = This hunting search uses native logs produced when a deployment server is within your environment. Splunk SOAR customers can find a SOAR workbook that walks an analyst through the process of running these hunting searches in the references list of this detection. In order to use this workbook, a user will need to run a curl command to post the file to their SOAR instance such as "curl -u username:password https://soar.instance.name/rest/rest/workbook_template -d @splunk_psa_0622.json". A user should then create an empty container or case, attach the workbook, and begin working through the tasks.
|
||||
action.escu.known_false_positives = None at this time.
|
||||
action.escu.creation_date = 2022-05-26
|
||||
action.escu.modification_date = 2022-05-26
|
||||
action.escu.confidence = high
|
||||
action.escu.full_search_name = ESCU - Splunk Process Injection Forwarder Bundle Downloads - Rule
|
||||
action.escu.search_type = detection
|
||||
action.escu.product = ["Splunk Enterprise", "Splunk Enterprise Security", "Splunk Cloud"]
|
||||
action.escu.providing_technologies = []
|
||||
action.escu.analytic_story = ["Splunk Vulnerabilites"]
|
||||
action.risk = 1
|
||||
action.risk.param._risk_message = $peer$ downloaded apps from $host$
|
||||
action.risk.param._risk = [{"risk_object_field": "host", "risk_object_type": "system", "risk_score": 35}]
|
||||
action.risk.param._risk_score = 0
|
||||
action.risk.param.verbose = 0
|
||||
cron_schedule = 0 * * * *
|
||||
dispatch.earliest_time = -70m@m
|
||||
dispatch.latest_time = -10m@m
|
||||
action.correlationsearch.enabled = 1
|
||||
action.correlationsearch.label = ESCU - Splunk Process Injection Forwarder Bundle Downloads - Rule
|
||||
action.correlationsearch.annotations = {"analytic_story": ["Splunk Vulnerabilites"], "cis20": ["CIS 3", "CIS 5", "CIS 16"], "confidence": 70, "context": ["Source:Endpoint"], "cve": ["CVE-2022-32157", "CVE-2022-32158"], "impact": 50, "kill_chain_phases": ["Exploitation"], "mitre_attack": ["T1055"], "nist": ["DE.CM"], "observable": [{"name": "host", "role": ["Victim"], "type": "Hostname"}]}
|
||||
schedule_window = auto
|
||||
alert.digest_mode = 1
|
||||
disabled = true
|
||||
enableSched = 1
|
||||
allow_skew = 100%
|
||||
counttype = number of events
|
||||
relation = greater than
|
||||
quantity = 0
|
||||
realtime_schedule = 0
|
||||
is_visible = false
|
||||
search = `splunkd` component="PackageDownloadRestHandler" | stats values(app) values(serverclass) by peer, host | `splunk_process_injection_forwarder_bundle_downloads_filter`
|
||||
|
||||
[ESCU - Splunk Protocol Impersonation Weak Encryption Configuration - Rule]
|
||||
action.escu = 0
|
||||
action.escu.enabled = 1
|
||||
description = On June 14th, 2022, Splunk released a security advisory relating to TLS validation occuring within the httplib and urllib python libraries shipped with Splunk. In addition to upgrading to Splunk Enterprise 9.0 or later, several configuration settings need to be set. This search will check those configurations on the search head it is run from as well as its search peers. In addition to these settings, the PYTHONHTTPSVERIFY setting in $SPLUNK_HOME/etc/splunk-launch.conf needs to be enabled as well. Other components such as additional search heads or anything this rest command cannot be distributed to will need to be manually checked.
|
||||
action.escu.mappings = {"cis20": ["CIS 3", "CIS 5", "CIS 16"], "kill_chain_phases": ["Exploitation"], "mitre_attack": ["T1001.003"], "nist": ["DE.CM"]}
|
||||
action.escu.data_models = []
|
||||
action.escu.eli5 = On June 14th, 2022, Splunk released a security advisory relating to TLS validation occuring within the httplib and urllib python libraries shipped with Splunk. In addition to upgrading to Splunk Enterprise 9.0 or later, several configuration settings need to be set. This search will check those configurations on the search head it is run from as well as its search peers. In addition to these settings, the PYTHONHTTPSVERIFY setting in $SPLUNK_HOME/etc/splunk-launch.conf needs to be enabled as well. Other components such as additional search heads or anything this rest command cannot be distributed to will need to be manually checked.
|
||||
action.escu.how_to_implement = The user running this search is required to have a permission allowing them to dispatch REST requests to indexers (The `dispatch_rest_to_indexers` capability). Splunk SOAR customers can find a SOAR workbook that walks an analyst through the process of running these hunting searches in the references list of this detection. In order to use this workbook, a user will need to run a curl command to post the file to their SOAR instance such as "curl -u username:password https://soar.instance.name/rest/rest/workbook_template -d @splunk_psa_0622.json". A user should then create an empty container or case, attach the workbook, and begin working through the tasks.
|
||||
action.escu.known_false_positives = While all of the settings on each device returned by this search may appear to be hardened, you will still need to verify the value of PYTHONHTTPSVERIFY in $SPLUNK_HOME/etc/splunk-launch.conf on each device in order to harden the python configuration.
|
||||
action.escu.creation_date = 2022-05-25
|
||||
action.escu.modification_date = 2022-05-25
|
||||
action.escu.confidence = high
|
||||
action.escu.full_search_name = ESCU - Splunk Protocol Impersonation Weak Encryption Configuration - Rule
|
||||
action.escu.search_type = detection
|
||||
action.escu.product = ["Splunk Enterprise", "Splunk Enterprise Security", "Splunk Cloud"]
|
||||
action.escu.providing_technologies = []
|
||||
action.escu.analytic_story = ["Splunk Vulnerabilities"]
|
||||
action.risk = 1
|
||||
action.risk.param._risk_message = $splunk_server$ may not be properly validating TLS Certificates
|
||||
action.risk.param._risk = [{"risk_object_field": "splunk_server", "risk_object_type": "system", "risk_score": 50}]
|
||||
action.risk.param._risk_score = 0
|
||||
action.risk.param.verbose = 0
|
||||
cron_schedule = 0 * * * *
|
||||
dispatch.earliest_time = -70m@m
|
||||
dispatch.latest_time = -10m@m
|
||||
action.correlationsearch.enabled = 1
|
||||
action.correlationsearch.label = ESCU - Splunk Protocol Impersonation Weak Encryption Configuration - Rule
|
||||
action.correlationsearch.annotations = {"analytic_story": ["Splunk Vulnerabilities"], "cis20": ["CIS 3", "CIS 5", "CIS 16"], "confidence": 100, "context": ["Source:Endpoint"], "cve": ["CVE-2022-32151"], "impact": 50, "kill_chain_phases": ["Exploitation"], "mitre_attack": ["T1001.003"], "nist": ["DE.CM"], "observable": [{"name": "splunk_server", "role": ["Victim"], "type": "Hostname"}]}
|
||||
schedule_window = auto
|
||||
alert.digest_mode = 1
|
||||
disabled = true
|
||||
enableSched = 1
|
||||
allow_skew = 100%
|
||||
counttype = number of events
|
||||
relation = greater than
|
||||
quantity = 0
|
||||
realtime_schedule = 0
|
||||
is_visible = false
|
||||
search = | rest /services/server/info | table splunk_server version server_roles | join splunk_server [| rest /servicesNS/nobody/search/configs/conf-server/ search="PythonSslClientConfig" | table splunk_server sslVerifyServerCert sslVerifyServerName] | join splunk_server [| rest /servicesNS/nobody/search/configs/conf-web/settings | table splunk_server serverCert sslVersions] | rename sslVerifyServerCert as "Server.conf:PythonSSLClientConfig:sslVerifyServerCert", sslVerifyServerName as "Server.conf:PythonSSLClientConfig:sslVerifyServerName", serverCert as "Web.conf:Settings:serverCert", sslVersions as "Web.conf:Settings:sslVersions" | `splunk_protocol_impersonation_weak_encryption_configuration_filter`
|
||||
|
||||
[ESCU - Splunk protocol impersonation weak encryption selfsigned - Rule]
|
||||
action.escu = 0
|
||||
action.escu.enabled = 1
|
||||
description = On June 14th 2022, Splunk released vulnerability advisory addresing Python TLS validation which was not set before Splunk version 9. This search displays events showing WARNING of using Splunk issued default selfsigned certificates.
|
||||
action.escu.mappings = {"cis20": ["CIS 3", "CIS 5", "CIS 16"], "kill_chain_phases": ["Exploitation"], "mitre_attack": ["T1588.004"], "nist": ["DE.CM"]}
|
||||
action.escu.data_models = []
|
||||
action.escu.eli5 = On June 14th 2022, Splunk released vulnerability advisory addresing Python TLS validation which was not set before Splunk version 9. This search displays events showing WARNING of using Splunk issued default selfsigned certificates.
|
||||
action.escu.how_to_implement = Must upgrade to Splunk version 9 and Configure TLS in order to apply this search. Splunk SOAR customers can find a SOAR workbook that walks an analyst through the process of running these hunting searches in the references list of this detection. In order to use this workbook, a user will need to run a curl command to post the file to their SOAR instance such as "curl -u username:password https://soar.instance.name/rest/rest/workbook_template -d @splunk_psa_0622.json". A user should then create an empty container or case, attach the workbook, and begin working through the tasks.
|
||||
action.escu.known_false_positives = This searches finds self signed certificates issued by Splunk which are not recommended from Splunk version 9 forward.
|
||||
action.escu.creation_date = 2022-05-26
|
||||
action.escu.modification_date = 2022-05-26
|
||||
action.escu.confidence = high
|
||||
action.escu.full_search_name = ESCU - Splunk protocol impersonation weak encryption selfsigned - Rule
|
||||
action.escu.search_type = detection
|
||||
action.escu.product = ["Splunk Enterprise", "Splunk Enterprise Security", "Splunk Cloud"]
|
||||
action.escu.providing_technologies = []
|
||||
action.escu.analytic_story = ["Splunk Vulnerabilities"]
|
||||
action.risk = 1
|
||||
action.risk.param._risk_message = Splunk default issued certificate at $host$
|
||||
action.risk.param._risk = [{"risk_object_field": "Hostname", "risk_object_type": "system", "risk_score": 40}]
|
||||
action.risk.param._risk_score = 0
|
||||
action.risk.param.verbose = 0
|
||||
cron_schedule = 0 * * * *
|
||||
dispatch.earliest_time = -70m@m
|
||||
dispatch.latest_time = -10m@m
|
||||
action.correlationsearch.enabled = 1
|
||||
action.correlationsearch.label = ESCU - Splunk protocol impersonation weak encryption selfsigned - Rule
|
||||
action.correlationsearch.annotations = {"analytic_story": ["Splunk Vulnerabilities"], "cis20": ["CIS 3", "CIS 5", "CIS 16"], "confidence": 80, "context": ["Source:Endpoint"], "cve": ["CVE-2022-32152"], "impact": 50, "kill_chain_phases": ["Exploitation"], "mitre_attack": ["T1588.004"], "nist": ["DE.CM"], "observable": [{"name": "Hostname", "role": ["Victim"], "type": "Hostname"}]}
|
||||
schedule_window = auto
|
||||
alert.digest_mode = 1
|
||||
disabled = true
|
||||
enableSched = 1
|
||||
allow_skew = 100%
|
||||
counttype = number of events
|
||||
relation = greater than
|
||||
quantity = 0
|
||||
realtime_schedule = 0
|
||||
is_visible = false
|
||||
search = `splunkd` certificate event_message="X509 certificate* should not be used*" | stats count by host CN component log_level | `splunk_protocol_impersonation_weak_encryption_selfsigned_filter`
|
||||
|
||||
[ESCU - Splunk protocol impersonation weak encryption simplerequest - Rule]
|
||||
action.escu = 0
|
||||
action.escu.enabled = 1
|
||||
description = On Splunk version 9 on Python3 client libraries verify server certificates by default and use CA certificate store. This search warns a user about a failure to validate a certificate using python3 request.
|
||||
action.escu.mappings = {"cis20": ["CIS 3", "CIS 5", "CIS 16"], "kill_chain_phases": ["Exploitation"], "mitre_attack": ["T1588.004"], "nist": ["DE.CM"]}
|
||||
action.escu.data_models = []
|
||||
action.escu.eli5 = On Splunk version 9 on Python3 client libraries verify server certificates by default and use CA certificate store. This search warns a user about a failure to validate a certificate using python3 request.
|
||||
action.escu.how_to_implement = Must upgrade to Splunk version 9 and Configure TLS host name validation for Splunk Python modules in order to apply this search. Splunk SOAR customers can find a SOAR workbook that walks an analyst through the process of running these hunting searches in the references list of this detection. In order to use this workbook, a user will need to run a curl command to post the file to their SOAR instance such as "curl -u username:password https://soar.instance.name/rest/rest/workbook_template -d @splunk_psa_0622.json". A user should then create an empty container or case, attach the workbook, and begin working through the tasks.
|
||||
action.escu.known_false_positives = This search tries to address validation of server and client certificates within Splunk infrastructure, it might produce results from accidental or unintended requests to port 8089.
|
||||
action.escu.creation_date = 2022-05-24
|
||||
action.escu.modification_date = 2022-05-24
|
||||
action.escu.confidence = high
|
||||
action.escu.full_search_name = ESCU - Splunk protocol impersonation weak encryption simplerequest - Rule
|
||||
action.escu.search_type = detection
|
||||
action.escu.product = ["Splunk Enterprise", "Splunk Enterprise Security", "Splunk Cloud"]
|
||||
action.escu.providing_technologies = []
|
||||
action.escu.analytic_story = ["Splunk Vulnerabilities"]
|
||||
action.risk = 1
|
||||
action.risk.param._risk_message = Failed to validate certificate on $host$
|
||||
action.risk.param._risk = [{"risk_object_field": "Hostname", "risk_object_type": "system", "risk_score": 40}]
|
||||
action.risk.param._risk_score = 0
|
||||
action.risk.param.verbose = 0
|
||||
cron_schedule = 0 * * * *
|
||||
dispatch.earliest_time = -70m@m
|
||||
dispatch.latest_time = -10m@m
|
||||
action.correlationsearch.enabled = 1
|
||||
action.correlationsearch.label = ESCU - Splunk protocol impersonation weak encryption simplerequest - Rule
|
||||
action.correlationsearch.annotations = {"analytic_story": ["Splunk Vulnerabilities"], "cis20": ["CIS 3", "CIS 5", "CIS 16"], "confidence": 80, "context": ["Source:Endpoint"], "cve": ["CVE-2022-32152"], "impact": 50, "kill_chain_phases": ["Exploitation"], "mitre_attack": ["T1588.004"], "nist": ["DE.CM"], "observable": [{"name": "Hostname", "role": ["Victim"], "type": "Hostname"}]}
|
||||
schedule_window = auto
|
||||
alert.digest_mode = 1
|
||||
disabled = true
|
||||
enableSched = 1
|
||||
allow_skew = 100%
|
||||
counttype = number of events
|
||||
relation = greater than
|
||||
quantity = 0
|
||||
realtime_schedule = 0
|
||||
is_visible = false
|
||||
search = `splunk_python` "simpleRequest SSL certificate validation is enabled without hostname verification" | stats count by host path | `splunk_protocol_impersonation_weak_encryption_simplerequest_filter`
|
||||
|
||||
[ESCU - Splunk User Enumeration Attempt - Rule]
|
||||
action.escu = 0
|
||||
action.escu.enabled = 1
|
||||
@@ -14349,8 +14709,8 @@ action.escu.data_models = ["Endpoint"]
|
||||
action.escu.eli5 = This search is to detect potential DNS exfiltration using nslookup application. This technique are seen in couple of malware and APT group to exfiltrated collected data in a infected machine or infected network. This detection is looking for unique use of nslookup where it tries to use specific record type (TXT, A, AAAA) that are commonly used by attacker and also the retry parameter which is designed to query C2 DNS multiple tries.
|
||||
action.escu.how_to_implement = To successfully implement this search, you need to be ingesting logs with the process name, parent process, and command-line executions from your endpoints. If you are using Sysmon, you must have at least version 6.0.4 of the Sysmon TA. Tune and filter known instances of nslookup.exe may be used.
|
||||
action.escu.known_false_positives = unknown
|
||||
action.escu.creation_date = 2021-04-21
|
||||
action.escu.modification_date = 2021-04-21
|
||||
action.escu.creation_date = 2022-06-03
|
||||
action.escu.modification_date = 2022-06-03
|
||||
action.escu.confidence = high
|
||||
action.escu.full_search_name = ESCU - Excessive Usage of NSLOOKUP App - Rule
|
||||
action.escu.search_type = detection
|
||||
@@ -14378,7 +14738,7 @@ relation = greater than
|
||||
quantity = 0
|
||||
realtime_schedule = 0
|
||||
is_visible = false
|
||||
search = `sysmon` EventCode = 1 process_name = "nslookup.exe" | bucket _time span=15m | stats count as numNsLookup by Computer, _time | eventstats avg(numNsLookup) as avgNsLookup, stdev(numNsLookup) as stdNsLookup, count as numSlots by Computer | eval upperThreshold=(avgNsLookup + stdNsLookup *3) | eval isOutlier=if(avgNsLookup > 20 and avgNsLookup >= upperThreshold, 1, 0) | search isOutlier=1 | `security_content_ctime(firstTime)` | `security_content_ctime(lastTime)` | `excessive_usage_of_nslookup_app_filter`
|
||||
search = `sysmon` EventCode = 1 process_name = "nslookup.exe" | bucket _time span=1m | stats count as numNsLookup by Computer, _time | eventstats avg(numNsLookup) as avgNsLookup, stdev(numNsLookup) as stdNsLookup, count as numSlots by Computer | eval upperThreshold=(avgNsLookup + stdNsLookup *3) | eval isOutlier=if(numNsLookup > 20 and numNsLookup >= upperThreshold, 1, 0) | search isOutlier=1 | `security_content_ctime(firstTime)` | `security_content_ctime(lastTime)` | `excessive_usage_of_nslookup_app_filter`
|
||||
|
||||
[ESCU - Excessive Usage Of SC Service Utility - Rule]
|
||||
action.escu = 0
|
||||
@@ -17173,20 +17533,20 @@ search = | tstats count from datamodel=Web where Web.http_user_agent="*Java*" We
|
||||
[ESCU - Java Writing JSP File - Rule]
|
||||
action.escu = 0
|
||||
action.escu.enabled = 1
|
||||
description = The following analytic identifies the process java writing a .jsp to disk. This is potentially indicative of a web shell being written to disk.
|
||||
description = The following analytic identifies the process java writing a .jsp to disk. This is potentially indicative of a web shell being written to disk. Modify and tune the analytic based on data ingested. For instance, it may be worth running a broad query for jsp file writes first before performing a join.
|
||||
action.escu.mappings = {"cis20": ["CIS 3", "CIS 5", "CIS 16"], "kill_chain_phases": ["Exploitation"], "mitre_attack": ["T1190"], "nist": ["DE.CM"]}
|
||||
action.escu.data_models = ["Endpoint"]
|
||||
action.escu.eli5 = The following analytic identifies the process java writing a .jsp to disk. This is potentially indicative of a web shell being written to disk.
|
||||
action.escu.eli5 = The following analytic identifies the process java writing a .jsp to disk. This is potentially indicative of a web shell being written to disk. Modify and tune the analytic based on data ingested. For instance, it may be worth running a broad query for jsp file writes first before performing a join.
|
||||
action.escu.how_to_implement = To successfully implement this search you need to be ingesting information on process that include the name of the process responsible for the changes from your endpoints into the `Endpoint` datamodel in the `Processes` and `Filesystem` node. In addition, confirm the latest CIM App 4.20 or higher is installed and the latest TA for the endpoint product.
|
||||
action.escu.known_false_positives = False positives are possible and filtering may be required. Restrict by assets or filter known jsp files that are common for the environment.
|
||||
action.escu.creation_date = 2022-04-05
|
||||
action.escu.modification_date = 2022-04-05
|
||||
action.escu.creation_date = 2022-06-03
|
||||
action.escu.modification_date = 2022-06-03
|
||||
action.escu.confidence = high
|
||||
action.escu.full_search_name = ESCU - Java Writing JSP File - Rule
|
||||
action.escu.search_type = detection
|
||||
action.escu.product = ["Splunk Enterprise", "Splunk Enterprise Security", "Splunk Cloud"]
|
||||
action.escu.providing_technologies = []
|
||||
action.escu.analytic_story = ["Spring4Shell CVE-2022-22965"]
|
||||
action.escu.analytic_story = ["Spring4Shell CVE-2022-22965", "Atlassian Confluence Server and Data Center CVE-2022-26134"]
|
||||
action.risk = 1
|
||||
action.risk.param._risk_message = An instance of $process_name$ was identified on endpoint $dest$ writing a jsp file to disk, potentially indicative of exploitation.
|
||||
action.risk.param._risk = [{"risk_object_field": "dest", "risk_object_type": "system", "risk_score": 42}, {"threat_object_field": "parent_process_name", "threat_object_type": "process"}, {"threat_object_field": "process_name", "threat_object_type": "process"}]
|
||||
@@ -17197,11 +17557,11 @@ dispatch.earliest_time = -70m@m
|
||||
dispatch.latest_time = -10m@m
|
||||
action.correlationsearch.enabled = 1
|
||||
action.correlationsearch.label = ESCU - Java Writing JSP File - Rule
|
||||
action.correlationsearch.annotations = {"analytic_story": ["Spring4Shell CVE-2022-22965"], "cis20": ["CIS 3", "CIS 5", "CIS 16"], "confidence": 70, "context": ["Source:Endpoint", "Stage:Defense Evasion"], "cve": ["CVE-2022-22965"], "impact": 60, "kill_chain_phases": ["Exploitation"], "mitre_attack": ["T1190"], "nist": ["DE.CM"], "observable": [{"name": "dest", "role": ["Victim"], "type": "Hostname"}, {"name": "parent_process_name", "role": ["Parent Process"], "type": "Process"}, {"name": "process_name", "role": ["Child Process"], "type": "Process"}]}
|
||||
action.correlationsearch.annotations = {"analytic_story": ["Spring4Shell CVE-2022-22965", "Atlassian Confluence Server and Data Center CVE-2022-26134"], "cis20": ["CIS 3", "CIS 5", "CIS 16"], "confidence": 70, "context": ["Source:Endpoint", "Stage:Defense Evasion"], "cve": ["CVE-2022-22965"], "impact": 60, "kill_chain_phases": ["Exploitation"], "mitre_attack": ["T1190"], "nist": ["DE.CM"], "observable": [{"name": "dest", "role": ["Victim"], "type": "Hostname"}, {"name": "parent_process_name", "role": ["Parent Process"], "type": "Process"}, {"name": "process_name", "role": ["Child Process"], "type": "Process"}]}
|
||||
schedule_window = auto
|
||||
action.notable = 1
|
||||
action.notable.param.nes_fields = user,dest
|
||||
action.notable.param.rule_description = The following analytic identifies the process java writing a .jsp to disk. This is potentially indicative of a web shell being written to disk.
|
||||
action.notable.param.rule_description = The following analytic identifies the process java writing a .jsp to disk. This is potentially indicative of a web shell being written to disk. Modify and tune the analytic based on data ingested. For instance, it may be worth running a broad query for jsp file writes first before performing a join.
|
||||
action.notable.param.rule_title = Java Writing JSP File
|
||||
action.notable.param.security_domain = endpoint
|
||||
action.notable.param.severity = high
|
||||
@@ -17782,13 +18142,13 @@ search = | tstats `security_content_summariesonly` count min(_time) as firstTime
|
||||
action.escu = 0
|
||||
action.escu.enabled = 1
|
||||
description = The following analytic identifies a suspicious process creation of At application. This process can be used by malware, adversaries and red teamers to create persistence entry to the targeted or compromised host with their malicious code. This anomaly detection can be a good indicator to investigate the event before and after this process execution, when it was executed and what schedule task it will execute.
|
||||
action.escu.mappings = {"cis20": ["CIS 3", "CIS 5", "CIS 16"], "kill_chain_phases": ["Exploitation"], "mitre_attack": ["T1053.001", "T1053"], "nist": ["DE.CM"]}
|
||||
action.escu.mappings = {"cis20": ["CIS 3", "CIS 5", "CIS 16"], "kill_chain_phases": ["Exploitation"], "mitre_attack": ["T1053.002", "T1053"], "nist": ["DE.CM"]}
|
||||
action.escu.data_models = ["Endpoint"]
|
||||
action.escu.eli5 = The following analytic identifies a suspicious process creation of At application. This process can be used by malware, adversaries and red teamers to create persistence entry to the targeted or compromised host with their malicious code. This anomaly detection can be a good indicator to investigate the event before and after this process execution, when it was executed and what schedule task it will execute.
|
||||
action.escu.how_to_implement = To successfully implement this search, you need to be ingesting logs with the process name, parent process, and command-line executions from your endpoints. If you are using Sysmon, you can use the Add-on for Linux Sysmon from Splunkbase.
|
||||
action.escu.known_false_positives = Administrator or network operator can use this application for automation purposes. Please update the filter macros to remove false positives.
|
||||
action.escu.creation_date = 2021-12-17
|
||||
action.escu.modification_date = 2021-12-17
|
||||
action.escu.creation_date = 2022-05-26
|
||||
action.escu.modification_date = 2022-05-26
|
||||
action.escu.confidence = high
|
||||
action.escu.full_search_name = ESCU - Linux At Application Execution - Rule
|
||||
action.escu.search_type = detection
|
||||
@@ -17805,7 +18165,7 @@ dispatch.earliest_time = -70m@m
|
||||
dispatch.latest_time = -10m@m
|
||||
action.correlationsearch.enabled = 1
|
||||
action.correlationsearch.label = ESCU - Linux At Application Execution - Rule
|
||||
action.correlationsearch.annotations = {"analytic_story": ["Linux Privilege Escalation", "Linux Persistence Techniques"], "cis20": ["CIS 3", "CIS 5", "CIS 16"], "confidence": 30, "context": ["Source:Endpoint", "Stage:Privilege Escalation", "Stage:Persistence"], "impact": 30, "kill_chain_phases": ["Exploitation"], "mitre_attack": ["T1053.001", "T1053"], "nist": ["DE.CM"], "observable": [{"name": "dest", "role": ["Victim"], "type": "Hostname"}]}
|
||||
action.correlationsearch.annotations = {"analytic_story": ["Linux Privilege Escalation", "Linux Persistence Techniques"], "cis20": ["CIS 3", "CIS 5", "CIS 16"], "confidence": 30, "context": ["Source:Endpoint", "Stage:Privilege Escalation", "Stage:Persistence"], "impact": 30, "kill_chain_phases": ["Exploitation"], "mitre_attack": ["T1053.002", "T1053"], "nist": ["DE.CM"], "observable": [{"name": "dest", "role": ["Victim"], "type": "Hostname"}]}
|
||||
schedule_window = auto
|
||||
alert.digest_mode = 1
|
||||
disabled = true
|
||||
@@ -18623,8 +18983,8 @@ action.escu.data_models = ["Endpoint"]
|
||||
action.escu.eli5 = This analytic looks for suspicious commandline that modify the iptables firewall setting of a linux machine. This technique was seen in cyclopsblink malware where it modifies the firewall setting of the compromised machine to allow traffic to its tcp port that will be used to communicate with its C2 server.
|
||||
action.escu.how_to_implement = To successfully implement this search, you need to be ingesting logs with the process name, parent process, and command-line executions from your endpoints. If you are using Sysmon, you can use the Add-on for Linux Sysmon from Splunkbase.
|
||||
action.escu.known_false_positives = administrator may do this commandline for auditing and testing purposes. In this scenario filter is needed.
|
||||
action.escu.creation_date = 2022-04-30
|
||||
action.escu.modification_date = 2022-04-30
|
||||
action.escu.creation_date = 2022-06-03
|
||||
action.escu.modification_date = 2022-06-03
|
||||
action.escu.confidence = high
|
||||
action.escu.full_search_name = ESCU - Linux Iptables Firewall Modification - Rule
|
||||
action.escu.search_type = detection
|
||||
@@ -18652,7 +19012,7 @@ relation = greater than
|
||||
quantity = 0
|
||||
realtime_schedule = 0
|
||||
is_visible = false
|
||||
search = | tstats `security_content_summariesonly` count min(_time) as firstTime max(_time) as lastTime from datamodel=Endpoint.Processes where Processes.process = "*iptables *" AND Processes.process = "* --dport *" AND Processes.process = "* ACCEPT*" AND Processes.process = "*&>/dev/null*" AND Processes.process = "* tcp *" AND NOT(Processes.parent_process_path IN("/bin/*", "/lib/*", "/usr/bin/*", "/sbin/*")) by Processes.process_name Processes.process Processes.process_id Processes.parent_process_id Processes.process_guid Processes.dest Processes.user Processes.parent_process_name Processes.parent_process_path Processes.process_path | rex field=Processes.process "--dport (?<port>3269|636|989|994|995|8443)" | stats values(Processes.process) as processes_exec values(port) as ports values(Processes.process_guid) as guids values(Processes.process_id) as pids dc(port) as port_count count by Processes.process_name Processes.parent_process_name Processes.parent_process_id Processes.dest Processes.user Processes.parent_process_path Processes.process_path firstTime lastTime | where port_count >=3 | `drop_dm_object_name(Processes)` | `security_content_ctime(firstTime)` | `security_content_ctime(lastTime)` | `linux_iptables_firewall_modification_filter`
|
||||
search = | tstats `security_content_summariesonly` count min(_time) as firstTime max(_time) as lastTime from datamodel=Endpoint.Processes where Processes.process = "*iptables *" AND Processes.process = "* --dport *" AND Processes.process = "* ACCEPT*" AND Processes.process = "*&>/dev/null*" AND Processes.process = "* tcp *" AND NOT(Processes.parent_process_path IN("/bin/*", "/lib/*", "/usr/bin/*", "/sbin/*")) by Processes.process_name Processes.process Processes.process_id Processes.parent_process_id Processes.process_guid Processes.dest _time span=10s Processes.user Processes.parent_process_name Processes.parent_process_path Processes.process_path | rex field=Processes.process "--dport (?<port>3269|636|989|994|995|8443)" | stats values(Processes.process) as processes_exec values(port) as ports values(Processes.process_guid) as guids values(Processes.process_id) as pids dc(port) as port_count count by Processes.process_name Processes.parent_process_name Processes.parent_process_id Processes.dest Processes.user Processes.parent_process_path Processes.process_path | where port_count >=3 | `drop_dm_object_name(Processes)` | `security_content_ctime(firstTime)` | `security_content_ctime(lastTime)` | `linux_iptables_firewall_modification_filter`
|
||||
|
||||
[ESCU - Linux Java Spawning Shell - Rule]
|
||||
action.escu = 0
|
||||
@@ -18950,13 +19310,13 @@ search = | tstats `security_content_summariesonly` count min(_time) as firstTime
|
||||
action.escu = 0
|
||||
action.escu.enabled = 1
|
||||
description = This analytic looks for suspicious commandline that may use to append user entry to /etc/at.allow or /etc/at.deny. These 2 files are commonly abused by malware, adversaries or red teamers to persist on the targeted or compromised host. These config file can restrict user that can only execute at application (another schedule task application in linux). attacker can create a user or add the compromised username to that config file to execute at to schedule it malicious code. This anomaly detection can be a good indicator to investigate further the entry in created config file and who created it to verify if it is a false positive.
|
||||
action.escu.mappings = {"cis20": ["CIS 3", "CIS 5", "CIS 16"], "kill_chain_phases": ["Exploitation"], "mitre_attack": ["T1053.001", "T1053"], "nist": ["DE.CM"]}
|
||||
action.escu.mappings = {"cis20": ["CIS 3", "CIS 5", "CIS 16"], "kill_chain_phases": ["Exploitation"], "mitre_attack": ["T1053.002", "T1053"], "nist": ["DE.CM"]}
|
||||
action.escu.data_models = ["Endpoint"]
|
||||
action.escu.eli5 = This analytic looks for suspicious commandline that may use to append user entry to /etc/at.allow or /etc/at.deny. These 2 files are commonly abused by malware, adversaries or red teamers to persist on the targeted or compromised host. These config file can restrict user that can only execute at application (another schedule task application in linux). attacker can create a user or add the compromised username to that config file to execute at to schedule it malicious code. This anomaly detection can be a good indicator to investigate further the entry in created config file and who created it to verify if it is a false positive.
|
||||
action.escu.how_to_implement = To successfully implement this search, you need to be ingesting logs with the process name, parent process, and command-line executions from your endpoints. If you are using Sysmon, you can use the Add-on for Linux Sysmon from Splunkbase.
|
||||
action.escu.known_false_positives = Administrator or network operator can use this commandline for automation purposes. Please update the filter macros to remove false positives.
|
||||
action.escu.creation_date = 2021-12-17
|
||||
action.escu.modification_date = 2021-12-17
|
||||
action.escu.creation_date = 2022-05-26
|
||||
action.escu.modification_date = 2022-05-26
|
||||
action.escu.confidence = high
|
||||
action.escu.full_search_name = ESCU - Linux Possible Append Command To At Allow Config File - Rule
|
||||
action.escu.search_type = detection
|
||||
@@ -18973,7 +19333,7 @@ dispatch.earliest_time = -70m@m
|
||||
dispatch.latest_time = -10m@m
|
||||
action.correlationsearch.enabled = 1
|
||||
action.correlationsearch.label = ESCU - Linux Possible Append Command To At Allow Config File - Rule
|
||||
action.correlationsearch.annotations = {"analytic_story": ["Linux Privilege Escalation", "Linux Persistence Techniques"], "cis20": ["CIS 3", "CIS 5", "CIS 16"], "confidence": 30, "context": ["Source:Endpoint", "Stage:Privilege Escalation", "Stage:Persistence"], "impact": 30, "kill_chain_phases": ["Exploitation"], "mitre_attack": ["T1053.001", "T1053"], "nist": ["DE.CM"], "observable": [{"name": "dest", "role": ["Victim"], "type": "Hostname"}]}
|
||||
action.correlationsearch.annotations = {"analytic_story": ["Linux Privilege Escalation", "Linux Persistence Techniques"], "cis20": ["CIS 3", "CIS 5", "CIS 16"], "confidence": 30, "context": ["Source:Endpoint", "Stage:Privilege Escalation", "Stage:Persistence"], "impact": 30, "kill_chain_phases": ["Exploitation"], "mitre_attack": ["T1053.002", "T1053"], "nist": ["DE.CM"], "observable": [{"name": "dest", "role": ["Victim"], "type": "Hostname"}]}
|
||||
schedule_window = auto
|
||||
alert.digest_mode = 1
|
||||
disabled = true
|
||||
@@ -19912,13 +20272,13 @@ search = `osquery` name=es_process_events columns.cmdline IN ("find*", "crontab*
|
||||
action.escu = 0
|
||||
action.escu.enabled = 1
|
||||
description = Detect usage of plutil to modify plist files. Adversaries can modiy plist files to executed binaries or add command line arguments. Plist files in auto-run locations are executed upon user logon or system startup.
|
||||
action.escu.mappings = {"cis20": ["CIS 3", "CIS 5", "CIS 16"], "kill_chain_phases": ["Actions on Objectives"], "mitre_attack": ["T1547.011"], "nist": ["DE.CM"]}
|
||||
action.escu.mappings = {"cis20": ["CIS 3", "CIS 5", "CIS 16"], "kill_chain_phases": ["Actions on Objectives"], "mitre_attack": ["T1647"], "nist": ["DE.CM"]}
|
||||
action.escu.data_models = ["Endpoint"]
|
||||
action.escu.eli5 = Detect usage of plutil to modify plist files. Adversaries can modiy plist files to executed binaries or add command line arguments. Plist files in auto-run locations are executed upon user logon or system startup.
|
||||
action.escu.how_to_implement = This detection uses osquery and endpoint security on MacOS. Follow the link in references, which describes how to setup process auditing in MacOS with endpoint security and osquery.
|
||||
action.escu.known_false_positives = Administrators using plutil to change plist files.
|
||||
action.escu.creation_date = 2022-03-29
|
||||
action.escu.modification_date = 2022-03-29
|
||||
action.escu.creation_date = 2022-05-26
|
||||
action.escu.modification_date = 2022-05-26
|
||||
action.escu.confidence = high
|
||||
action.escu.full_search_name = ESCU - MacOS plutil - Rule
|
||||
action.escu.search_type = detection
|
||||
@@ -19935,7 +20295,7 @@ dispatch.earliest_time = -70m@m
|
||||
dispatch.latest_time = -10m@m
|
||||
action.correlationsearch.enabled = 1
|
||||
action.correlationsearch.label = ESCU - MacOS plutil - Rule
|
||||
action.correlationsearch.annotations = {"analytic_story": ["Living Off The Land"], "cis20": ["CIS 3", "CIS 5", "CIS 16"], "confidence": 50, "context": ["Source:Endpoint", "Stage:Execution"], "impact": 50, "kill_chain_phases": ["Actions on Objectives"], "mitre_attack": ["T1547.011"], "nist": ["DE.CM"], "observable": [{"name": "user", "role": ["Victim"], "type": "User"}, {"name": "process", "role": ["Child Process"], "type": "Process"}]}
|
||||
action.correlationsearch.annotations = {"analytic_story": ["Living Off The Land"], "cis20": ["CIS 3", "CIS 5", "CIS 16"], "confidence": 50, "context": ["Source:Endpoint", "Stage:Execution"], "impact": 50, "kill_chain_phases": ["Actions on Objectives"], "mitre_attack": ["T1647"], "nist": ["DE.CM"], "observable": [{"name": "user", "role": ["Victim"], "type": "User"}, {"name": "process", "role": ["Child Process"], "type": "Process"}]}
|
||||
schedule_window = auto
|
||||
action.notable = 1
|
||||
action.notable.param.nes_fields = user,dest
|
||||
@@ -20635,8 +20995,8 @@ action.escu.data_models = ["Endpoint"]
|
||||
action.escu.eli5 = The following detection identifies the module load of mshtml.dll into an Office product. This behavior has been related to CVE-2021-40444, whereas the malicious document will load ActiveX, which activates the MSHTML component. The vulnerability resides in the MSHTML component. During triage, identify parallel processes and capture any file modifications for analysis.
|
||||
action.escu.how_to_implement = To successfully implement this search, you need to be ingesting logs with the process names and image loads from your endpoints. If you are using Sysmon, you must have at least version 6.0.4 of the Sysmon TA.
|
||||
action.escu.known_false_positives = Limited false positives will be present, however, tune as necessary.
|
||||
action.escu.creation_date = 2021-09-09
|
||||
action.escu.modification_date = 2021-09-09
|
||||
action.escu.creation_date = 2022-06-01
|
||||
action.escu.modification_date = 2022-06-01
|
||||
action.escu.confidence = high
|
||||
action.escu.full_search_name = ESCU - MSHTML Module Load in Office Product - Rule
|
||||
action.escu.search_type = detection
|
||||
@@ -20670,7 +21030,7 @@ relation = greater than
|
||||
quantity = 0
|
||||
realtime_schedule = 0
|
||||
is_visible = false
|
||||
search = `sysmon` EventID=7 process_name IN ("winword.exe","excel.exe","powerpnt.exe","mspub.exe","visio.exe","wordpad.exe","wordview.exe") ImageLoaded IN ("*\\mshtml.dll", "*\\Microsoft.mshtml.dll","*\\IE.Interop.MSHTML.dll","*\\MshtmlDac.dll","*\\MshtmlDed.dll","*\\MshtmlDer.dll") | stats count min(_time) as firstTime max(_time) as lastTime by Computer, process_name, ImageLoaded, OriginalFileName, process_id | rename Computer as dest | `security_content_ctime(firstTime)` | `security_content_ctime(lastTime)` | `mshtml_module_load_in_office_product_filter`
|
||||
search = `sysmon` EventID=7 process_name IN ("winword.exe","excel.exe","powerpnt.exe","mspub.exe","visio.exe","wordpad.exe","wordview.exe") ImageLoaded IN ("*\\mshtml.dll", "*\\Microsoft.mshtml.dll","*\\IE.Interop.MSHTML.dll","*\\MshtmlDac.dll","*\\MshtmlDed.dll","*\\MshtmlDer.dll") | stats count min(_time) as firstTime max(_time) as lastTime by Computer, process_name, ImageLoaded, OriginalFileName, ProcessGuid | rename Computer as dest | `security_content_ctime(firstTime)` | `security_content_ctime(lastTime)` | `mshtml_module_load_in_office_product_filter`
|
||||
|
||||
[ESCU - MSI Module Loaded by Non-System Binary - Rule]
|
||||
action.escu = 0
|
||||
@@ -27245,7 +27605,7 @@ relation = greater than
|
||||
quantity = 0
|
||||
realtime_schedule = 0
|
||||
is_visible = false
|
||||
search = `sysmon` EventCode=7 Image ="*\\spoolsv.exe" ImageLoaded="*\\Windows\\System32\\spool\\drivers\\x64\\*" ImageLoaded = "*.dll" | stats dc(ImageLoaded) as countImgloaded values(ImageLoaded) as ImgLoaded count min(_time) as firstTime max(_time) as lastTime by Image Computer process_id EventCode | where countImgloaded >= 3 | `security_content_ctime(firstTime)` | `security_content_ctime(lastTime)` | `spoolsv_suspicious_loaded_modules_filter`
|
||||
search = `sysmon` EventCode=7 Image ="*\\spoolsv.exe" ImageLoaded="*\\Windows\\System32\\spool\\drivers\\x64\\*" ImageLoaded = "*.dll" | stats dc(ImageLoaded) as countImgloaded values(ImageLoaded) as ImgLoaded count min(_time) as firstTime max(_time) as lastTime by Image Computer ProcessId EventCode | where countImgloaded >= 3 | `security_content_ctime(firstTime)` | `security_content_ctime(lastTime)` | `spoolsv_suspicious_loaded_modules_filter`
|
||||
|
||||
[ESCU - Spoolsv Suspicious Process Access - Rule]
|
||||
action.escu = 0
|
||||
@@ -28305,8 +28665,8 @@ action.escu.data_models = ["Endpoint"]
|
||||
action.escu.eli5 = This analytic identifies a process making a DNS query to Discord, a well known instant messaging and digital distribution platform. Discord can be abused by adversaries, as seen in the WhisperGate campaign, to host and download malicious. external files. A process resolving a Discord DNS name could be an indicator of malware trying to download files from Discord for further execution.
|
||||
action.escu.how_to_implement = his detection relies on sysmon logs with the Event ID 22, DNS Query.
|
||||
action.escu.known_false_positives = Noise and false positive can be seen if the following instant messaging is allowed to use within corporate network. In this case, a filter is needed.
|
||||
action.escu.creation_date = 2022-01-19
|
||||
action.escu.modification_date = 2022-01-19
|
||||
action.escu.creation_date = 2022-06-01
|
||||
action.escu.modification_date = 2022-06-01
|
||||
action.escu.confidence = high
|
||||
action.escu.full_search_name = ESCU - Suspicious Process With Discord DNS Query - Rule
|
||||
action.escu.search_type = detection
|
||||
@@ -28334,7 +28694,7 @@ relation = greater than
|
||||
quantity = 0
|
||||
realtime_schedule = 0
|
||||
is_visible = false
|
||||
search = `sysmon` EventCode=22 QueryName IN ("*discord*") process_path != "*\\AppData\\Local\\Discord\\*" AND process_path != "*\\Program Files*" AND process_name != "discord.exe" | stats count min(_time) as firstTime max(_time) as lastTime by Image QueryName QueryStatus process_name QueryResults Computer process_path | `security_content_ctime(firstTime)` | `security_content_ctime(lastTime)` | `suspicious_process_with_discord_dns_query_filter`
|
||||
search = `sysmon` EventCode=22 QueryName IN ("*discord*") Image != "*\\AppData\\Local\\Discord\\*" AND Image != "*\\Program Files*" AND Image != "discord.exe" | stats count min(_time) as firstTime max(_time) as lastTime by Image QueryName QueryStatus process_name QueryResults Computer | `security_content_ctime(firstTime)` | `security_content_ctime(lastTime)` | `suspicious_process_with_discord_dns_query_filter`
|
||||
|
||||
[ESCU - Suspicious Reg exe Process - Rule]
|
||||
action.escu = 0
|
||||
@@ -29470,9 +29830,9 @@ action.escu.mappings = {"cis20": ["CIS 8"], "kill_chain_phases": ["Actions on Ob
|
||||
action.escu.data_models = ["Endpoint"]
|
||||
action.escu.eli5 = Attackers often disable security tools to avoid detection. This search looks for the usage of process `fltMC.exe` to unload a Sysmon Driver that will stop sysmon from collecting the data.
|
||||
action.escu.how_to_implement = You must be ingesting data that records process activity from your hosts to populate the Endpoint data model in the Processes node. You must also be ingesting logs with both the process name and command line from your endpoints. The command-line arguments are mapped to the "process" field in the Endpoint data model. This search is also shipped with `unload_sysmon_filter_driver_filter` macro, update this macro to filter out false positives.
|
||||
action.escu.known_false_positives =
|
||||
action.escu.creation_date = 2020-07-22
|
||||
action.escu.modification_date = 2020-07-22
|
||||
action.escu.known_false_positives = Unknown at the moment
|
||||
action.escu.creation_date = 2022-06-01
|
||||
action.escu.modification_date = 2022-06-01
|
||||
action.escu.confidence = high
|
||||
action.escu.full_search_name = ESCU - Unload Sysmon Filter Driver - Rule
|
||||
action.escu.search_type = detection
|
||||
@@ -29961,8 +30321,8 @@ action.escu.data_models = ["Endpoint"]
|
||||
action.escu.eli5 = this search is designed to detect suspicious wermgr.exe process that tries to connect to known IP web services. This technique is know for trickbot and other trojan spy malware to recon the infected machine and look for its ip address without so much finger print on the commandline process. Since wermgr.exe is designed for error handling process of windows it is really suspicious that this process is trying to connect to this IP web services cause that maybe cause of some malicious code injection.
|
||||
action.escu.how_to_implement = To successfully implement this search, you need to be ingesting logs with the process name, dns query name process path , and query ststus from your endpoints like EventCode 22. If you are using Sysmon, you must have at least version 12 of the Sysmon TA.
|
||||
action.escu.known_false_positives = unknown
|
||||
action.escu.creation_date = 2021-04-19
|
||||
action.escu.modification_date = 2021-04-19
|
||||
action.escu.creation_date = 2022-06-01
|
||||
action.escu.modification_date = 2022-06-01
|
||||
action.escu.confidence = high
|
||||
action.escu.full_search_name = ESCU - Wermgr Process Connecting To IP Check Web Services - Rule
|
||||
action.escu.search_type = detection
|
||||
@@ -29996,7 +30356,7 @@ relation = greater than
|
||||
quantity = 0
|
||||
realtime_schedule = 0
|
||||
is_visible = false
|
||||
search = `sysmon` EventCode =22 process_name = wermgr.exe QueryName IN ("*wtfismyip.com", "*checkip.amazonaws.com", "*ipecho.net", "*ipinfo.io", "*api.ipify.org", "*icanhazip.com", "*ip.anysrc.com","*api.ip.sb", "ident.me", "www.myexternalip.com", "*zen.spamhaus.org", "*cbl.abuseat.org", "*b.barracudacentral.org","*dnsbl-1.uceprotect.net", "*spam.dnsbl.sorbs.net") | stats min(_time) as firstTime max(_time) as lastTime count by process_path process_name process_id QueryName QueryStatus QueryResults Computer EventCode | `security_content_ctime(firstTime)` | `security_content_ctime(lastTime)` | `wermgr_process_connecting_to_ip_check_web_services_filter`
|
||||
search = `sysmon` EventCode =22 process_name = wermgr.exe QueryName IN ("*wtfismyip.com", "*checkip.amazonaws.com", "*ipecho.net", "*ipinfo.io", "*api.ipify.org", "*icanhazip.com", "*ip.anysrc.com","*api.ip.sb", "ident.me", "www.myexternalip.com", "*zen.spamhaus.org", "*cbl.abuseat.org", "*b.barracudacentral.org","*dnsbl-1.uceprotect.net", "*spam.dnsbl.sorbs.net") | stats min(_time) as firstTime max(_time) as lastTime count by Image process_name ProcessId QueryName QueryStatus QueryResults Computer EventCode | `security_content_ctime(firstTime)` | `security_content_ctime(lastTime)` | `wermgr_process_connecting_to_ip_check_web_services_filter`
|
||||
|
||||
[ESCU - Wermgr Process Create Executable File - Rule]
|
||||
action.escu = 0
|
||||
@@ -30182,6 +30542,92 @@ realtime_schedule = 0
|
||||
is_visible = false
|
||||
search = | tstats `security_content_summariesonly` count min(_time) as firstTime max(_time) as lastTime from datamodel=Endpoint.Processes where (Processes.process="* -f *" OR Processes.process="* -b *") AND (Processes.process=*objectcategory* OR Processes.process="* -gcb *" OR Processes.process="* -sc *") by Processes.dest Processes.user Processes.process_name Processes.process Processes.parent_process Processes.process_id Processes.parent_process_id | `drop_dm_object_name(Processes)` | `security_content_ctime(firstTime)` | `security_content_ctime(lastTime)` | `windows_adfind_exe_filter`
|
||||
|
||||
[ESCU - Windows Command and Scripting Interpreter Hunting Path Traversal - Rule]
|
||||
action.escu = 0
|
||||
action.escu.enabled = 1
|
||||
description = The following analytic identifies path traversal command-line execution and should be used to tune and driver other more higher fidelity analytics. This technique was seen in malicious document that execute malicious code using msdt.exe and path traversal technique that serve as defense evasion. This Hunting query is a good pivot to look for possible suspicious process and command-line that runs execute path traversal technique to run malicious code. This may help you to find possible downloaded malware or other lolbin execution.
|
||||
action.escu.mappings = {"cis20": ["CIS 3", "CIS 5", "CIS 16"], "kill_chain_phases": ["Exploitation"], "mitre_attack": ["T1059"], "nist": ["DE.CM"]}
|
||||
action.escu.data_models = ["Endpoint"]
|
||||
action.escu.eli5 = The following analytic identifies path traversal command-line execution and should be used to tune and driver other more higher fidelity analytics. This technique was seen in malicious document that execute malicious code using msdt.exe and path traversal technique that serve as defense evasion. This Hunting query is a good pivot to look for possible suspicious process and command-line that runs execute path traversal technique to run malicious code. This may help you to find possible downloaded malware or other lolbin execution.
|
||||
action.escu.how_to_implement = To successfully implement this search you need to be ingesting information on process that include the name of the process responsible for the changes from your endpoints into the `Endpoint` datamodel in the `Processes` node. In addition, confirm the latest CIM App 4.20 or higher is installed and the latest TA for the endpoint product
|
||||
action.escu.known_false_positives = false positive may vary depends on the score you want to check. The bigger number of path traversal string count the better.
|
||||
action.escu.creation_date = 2022-06-01
|
||||
action.escu.modification_date = 2022-06-01
|
||||
action.escu.confidence = high
|
||||
action.escu.full_search_name = ESCU - Windows Command and Scripting Interpreter Hunting Path Traversal - Rule
|
||||
action.escu.search_type = detection
|
||||
action.escu.product = ["Splunk Enterprise", "Splunk Enterprise Security", "Splunk Cloud"]
|
||||
action.escu.providing_technologies = []
|
||||
action.escu.analytic_story = ["Windows Defense Evasion Tactics", "Microsoft Support Diagnostic Tool Vulnerability CVE-2022-30190"]
|
||||
action.risk = 1
|
||||
action.risk.param._risk_message = A parent process $parent_process_name$ has spawned a child $process_name$ with path traversal commandline $process$ in $dest$
|
||||
action.risk.param._risk = [{"risk_object_field": "dest", "risk_object_type": "system", "risk_score": 36}]
|
||||
action.risk.param._risk_score = 0
|
||||
action.risk.param.verbose = 0
|
||||
cron_schedule = 0 * * * *
|
||||
dispatch.earliest_time = -70m@m
|
||||
dispatch.latest_time = -10m@m
|
||||
action.correlationsearch.enabled = 1
|
||||
action.correlationsearch.label = ESCU - Windows Command and Scripting Interpreter Hunting Path Traversal - Rule
|
||||
action.correlationsearch.annotations = {"analytic_story": ["Windows Defense Evasion Tactics", "Microsoft Support Diagnostic Tool Vulnerability CVE-2022-30190"], "cis20": ["CIS 3", "CIS 5", "CIS 16"], "confidence": 60, "context": ["Source:Endpoint", "Stage:Defense Evasion"], "impact": 60, "kill_chain_phases": ["Exploitation"], "mitre_attack": ["T1059"], "nist": ["DE.CM"], "observable": [{"name": "dest", "role": ["Victim"], "type": "Hostname"}]}
|
||||
schedule_window = auto
|
||||
alert.digest_mode = 1
|
||||
disabled = true
|
||||
enableSched = 1
|
||||
allow_skew = 100%
|
||||
counttype = number of events
|
||||
relation = greater than
|
||||
quantity = 0
|
||||
realtime_schedule = 0
|
||||
is_visible = false
|
||||
search = | tstats `security_content_summariesonly` count min(_time) as firstTime max(_time) as lastTime FROM datamodel=Endpoint.Processes by Processes.original_file_name Processes.process_id Processes.parent_process_id Processes.process_hash Processes.dest Processes.user Processes.parent_process Processes.process_name Processes.process | `drop_dm_object_name("Processes")` | `security_content_ctime(firstTime)` | `security_content_ctime(lastTime)` | eval count_of_pattern1 = (mvcount(split(process,"/.."))-1) | eval count_of_pattern2 = (mvcount(split(process,"\.."))-1) | eval count_of_pattern3 = (mvcount(split(process,"\\.."))-1) | eval count_of_pattern4 = (mvcount(split(process,"//.."))-1) | search count_of_pattern1 > 1 OR count_of_pattern2 > 1 OR count_of_pattern3 > 1 OR count_of_pattern4 > 1 | `windows_command_and_scripting_interpreter_hunting_path_traversal_filter`
|
||||
|
||||
[ESCU - Windows Command and Scripting Interpreter Path Traversal Exec - Rule]
|
||||
action.escu = 0
|
||||
action.escu.enabled = 1
|
||||
description = The following analytic identifies path traversal command-line execution. This technique was seen in malicious document that execute malicious code using msdt.exe and path traversal technique that serve as defense evasion. This TTP is a good pivot to look for more suspicious process and command-line that runs before and after this execution. This may help you to find possible downloaded malware or other lolbin execution.
|
||||
action.escu.mappings = {"cis20": ["CIS 3", "CIS 5", "CIS 16"], "kill_chain_phases": ["Exploitation"], "mitre_attack": ["T1059"], "nist": ["DE.CM"]}
|
||||
action.escu.data_models = ["Endpoint"]
|
||||
action.escu.eli5 = The following analytic identifies path traversal command-line execution. This technique was seen in malicious document that execute malicious code using msdt.exe and path traversal technique that serve as defense evasion. This TTP is a good pivot to look for more suspicious process and command-line that runs before and after this execution. This may help you to find possible downloaded malware or other lolbin execution.
|
||||
action.escu.how_to_implement = To successfully implement this search you need to be ingesting information on process that include the name of the process responsible for the changes from your endpoints into the `Endpoint` datamodel in the `Processes` node. In addition, confirm the latest CIM App 4.20 or higher is installed and the latest TA for the endpoint product
|
||||
action.escu.known_false_positives = Not known at this moment.
|
||||
action.escu.creation_date = 2022-06-01
|
||||
action.escu.modification_date = 2022-06-01
|
||||
action.escu.confidence = high
|
||||
action.escu.full_search_name = ESCU - Windows Command and Scripting Interpreter Path Traversal Exec - Rule
|
||||
action.escu.search_type = detection
|
||||
action.escu.product = ["Splunk Enterprise", "Splunk Enterprise Security", "Splunk Cloud"]
|
||||
action.escu.providing_technologies = []
|
||||
action.escu.analytic_story = ["Windows Defense Evasion Tactics", "Microsoft Support Diagnostic Tool Vulnerability CVE-2022-30190"]
|
||||
action.risk = 1
|
||||
action.risk.param._risk_message = A parent process $parent_process_name$ has spawned a child $process_name$ with path traversal commandline $process$ in $dest$
|
||||
action.risk.param._risk = [{"risk_object_field": "dest", "risk_object_type": "system", "risk_score": 90}]
|
||||
action.risk.param._risk_score = 0
|
||||
action.risk.param.verbose = 0
|
||||
cron_schedule = 0 * * * *
|
||||
dispatch.earliest_time = -70m@m
|
||||
dispatch.latest_time = -10m@m
|
||||
action.correlationsearch.enabled = 1
|
||||
action.correlationsearch.label = ESCU - Windows Command and Scripting Interpreter Path Traversal Exec - Rule
|
||||
action.correlationsearch.annotations = {"analytic_story": ["Windows Defense Evasion Tactics", "Microsoft Support Diagnostic Tool Vulnerability CVE-2022-30190"], "cis20": ["CIS 3", "CIS 5", "CIS 16"], "confidence": 100, "context": ["Source:Endpoint", "Stage:Defense Evasion"], "impact": 90, "kill_chain_phases": ["Exploitation"], "mitre_attack": ["T1059"], "nist": ["DE.CM"], "observable": [{"name": "dest", "role": ["Victim"], "type": "Hostname"}]}
|
||||
schedule_window = auto
|
||||
action.notable = 1
|
||||
action.notable.param.nes_fields = user,dest
|
||||
action.notable.param.rule_description = The following analytic identifies path traversal command-line execution. This technique was seen in malicious document that execute malicious code using msdt.exe and path traversal technique that serve as defense evasion. This TTP is a good pivot to look for more suspicious process and command-line that runs before and after this execution. This may help you to find possible downloaded malware or other lolbin execution.
|
||||
action.notable.param.rule_title = Windows Command and Scripting Interpreter Path Traversal Exec
|
||||
action.notable.param.security_domain = endpoint
|
||||
action.notable.param.severity = high
|
||||
alert.digest_mode = 1
|
||||
disabled = true
|
||||
enableSched = 1
|
||||
allow_skew = 100%
|
||||
counttype = number of events
|
||||
relation = greater than
|
||||
quantity = 0
|
||||
realtime_schedule = 0
|
||||
is_visible = false
|
||||
search = | tstats `security_content_summariesonly` count min(_time) as firstTime max(_time) as lastTime FROM datamodel=Endpoint.Processes where Processes.process="*\/..\/..\/..\/*" OR Processes.process="*\\..\\..\\..\\*" OR Processes.process="*\/\/..\/\/..\/\/..\/\/*" by Processes.dest Processes.user Processes.parent_process Processes.process_name Processes.process Processes.original_file_name Processes.process_id Processes.parent_process_id Processes.process_hash | `drop_dm_object_name("Processes")` | `security_content_ctime(firstTime)` | `security_content_ctime(lastTime)` | `windows_command_and_scripting_interpreter_path_traversal_exec_filter`
|
||||
|
||||
[ESCU - Windows Computer Account Created by Computer Account - Rule]
|
||||
action.escu = 0
|
||||
action.escu.enabled = 1
|
||||
@@ -31290,6 +31736,52 @@ realtime_schedule = 0
|
||||
is_visible = false
|
||||
search = `wineventlog_system` EventCode=7040 Message = "*service was changed from demand start to disabled." | stats count values(Message) as MessageList dc(Message) as MessageCount min(_time) as firstTime max(_time) as lastTime by ComputerName EventCode User Sid | where MessageCount >=10 | `security_content_ctime(firstTime)` | `security_content_ctime(lastTime)` | `windows_excessive_disabled_services_event_filter`
|
||||
|
||||
[ESCU - Windows Execute Arbitrary Commands with MSDT - Rule]
|
||||
action.escu = 0
|
||||
action.escu.enabled = 1
|
||||
description = The following analytic identifies a recently disclosed arbitraty command execution using Windows msdt.exe - a Diagnostics Troubleshooting Wizard. The sample identified will use the ms-msdt:/ protocol handler to load msdt.exe to retrieve a remote payload. During triage, review file modifications for html. Identify parallel process execution that may be related, including an Office Product.
|
||||
action.escu.mappings = {"cis20": ["CIS 3", "CIS 5", "CIS 16"], "kill_chain_phases": ["Exploitation"], "mitre_attack": ["T1218"], "nist": ["DE.CM"]}
|
||||
action.escu.data_models = ["Endpoint"]
|
||||
action.escu.eli5 = The following analytic identifies a recently disclosed arbitraty command execution using Windows msdt.exe - a Diagnostics Troubleshooting Wizard. The sample identified will use the ms-msdt:/ protocol handler to load msdt.exe to retrieve a remote payload. During triage, review file modifications for html. Identify parallel process execution that may be related, including an Office Product.
|
||||
action.escu.how_to_implement = To successfully implement this search you need to be ingesting information on process that include the name of the process responsible for the changes from your endpoints into the `Endpoint` datamodel in the `Processes` node. In addition, confirm the latest CIM App 4.20 or higher is installed and the latest TA for the endpoint product.
|
||||
action.escu.known_false_positives = False positives may be present, filter as needed. Added .xml to potentially capture any answer file usage. Remove as needed.
|
||||
action.escu.creation_date = 2022-05-30
|
||||
action.escu.modification_date = 2022-05-30
|
||||
action.escu.confidence = high
|
||||
action.escu.full_search_name = ESCU - Windows Execute Arbitrary Commands with MSDT - Rule
|
||||
action.escu.search_type = detection
|
||||
action.escu.product = ["Splunk Enterprise", "Splunk Enterprise Security", "Splunk Cloud"]
|
||||
action.escu.providing_technologies = []
|
||||
action.escu.analytic_story = ["Microsoft Support Diagnostic Tool Vulnerability CVE-2022-30190"]
|
||||
action.risk = 1
|
||||
action.risk.param._risk_message = A parent process $parent_process_name$ has spawned a child process $process_name$ on host $dest$ possibly indicative of indirect command execution.
|
||||
action.risk.param._risk = [{"risk_object_field": "user", "risk_object_type": "user", "risk_score": 100}, {"risk_object_field": "dest", "risk_object_type": "system", "risk_score": 100}, {"threat_object_field": "parent_process_name", "threat_object_type": "process"}, {"threat_object_field": "process_name", "threat_object_type": "process"}]
|
||||
action.risk.param._risk_score = 0
|
||||
action.risk.param.verbose = 0
|
||||
cron_schedule = 0 * * * *
|
||||
dispatch.earliest_time = -70m@m
|
||||
dispatch.latest_time = -10m@m
|
||||
action.correlationsearch.enabled = 1
|
||||
action.correlationsearch.label = ESCU - Windows Execute Arbitrary Commands with MSDT - Rule
|
||||
action.correlationsearch.annotations = {"analytic_story": ["Microsoft Support Diagnostic Tool Vulnerability CVE-2022-30190"], "cis20": ["CIS 3", "CIS 5", "CIS 16"], "confidence": 100, "context": ["Source:Endpoint", "Stage:Defense Evasion"], "cve": ["CVE-2022-30190"], "impact": 100, "kill_chain_phases": ["Exploitation"], "mitre_attack": ["T1218"], "nist": ["DE.CM"], "observable": [{"name": "user", "role": ["Victim"], "type": "User"}, {"name": "dest", "role": ["Victim"], "type": "Hostname"}, {"name": "parent_process_name", "role": ["Parent Process"], "type": "Process"}, {"name": "process_name", "role": ["Child Process"], "type": "Process"}]}
|
||||
schedule_window = auto
|
||||
action.notable = 1
|
||||
action.notable.param.nes_fields = user,dest
|
||||
action.notable.param.rule_description = The following analytic identifies a recently disclosed arbitraty command execution using Windows msdt.exe - a Diagnostics Troubleshooting Wizard. The sample identified will use the ms-msdt:/ protocol handler to load msdt.exe to retrieve a remote payload. During triage, review file modifications for html. Identify parallel process execution that may be related, including an Office Product.
|
||||
action.notable.param.rule_title = Windows Execute Arbitrary Commands with MSDT
|
||||
action.notable.param.security_domain = endpoint
|
||||
action.notable.param.severity = high
|
||||
alert.digest_mode = 1
|
||||
disabled = true
|
||||
enableSched = 1
|
||||
allow_skew = 100%
|
||||
counttype = number of events
|
||||
relation = greater than
|
||||
quantity = 0
|
||||
realtime_schedule = 0
|
||||
is_visible = false
|
||||
search = | tstats `security_content_summariesonly` count min(_time) as firstTime max(_time) as lastTime from datamodel=Endpoint.Processes where Processes.process_name=msdt.exe Processes.process IN ("*ms-msdt:/id*","*ms-msdt:-id*","*/id*") AND (Processes.process="*IT_BrowseForFile=*" OR Processes.process="*IT_RebrowseForFile=*" OR Processes.process="*.xml*") AND Processes.process="*PCWDiagnostic*" by Processes.dest Processes.user Processes.parent_process_name Processes.process_name Processes.process Processes.process_id Processes.parent_process_id | `drop_dm_object_name(Processes)` | `security_content_ctime(firstTime)` | `security_content_ctime(lastTime)`| `windows_execute_arbitrary_commands_with_msdt_filter`
|
||||
|
||||
[ESCU - Windows File Without Extension In Critical Folder - Rule]
|
||||
action.escu = 0
|
||||
action.escu.enabled = 1
|
||||
@@ -31655,8 +32147,8 @@ If used by a developer, typically this will be found with multiple command-line
|
||||
During triage review resulting network connections, file modifications, and parallel processes. Capture any artifacts and review further.
|
||||
action.escu.how_to_implement = To successfully implement this search, you need to be ingesting logs with the process name, parent process, and module loads from your endpoints. If you are using Sysmon, you must have at least version 6.0.4 of the Sysmon TA.
|
||||
action.escu.known_false_positives = Typically this will not trigger as by it's very nature InstallUtil does not need credentials. Filter as needed.
|
||||
action.escu.creation_date = 2021-11-12
|
||||
action.escu.modification_date = 2021-11-12
|
||||
action.escu.creation_date = 2022-06-01
|
||||
action.escu.modification_date = 2022-06-01
|
||||
action.escu.confidence = high
|
||||
action.escu.full_search_name = ESCU - Windows InstallUtil Credential Theft - Rule
|
||||
action.escu.search_type = detection
|
||||
@@ -31693,7 +32185,7 @@ relation = greater than
|
||||
quantity = 0
|
||||
realtime_schedule = 0
|
||||
is_visible = false
|
||||
search = `sysmon` EventCode=7 process_name=installutil.exe ImageLoaded IN ("*\\samlib.dll", "*\\vaultcli.dll") | stats count min(_time) as firstTime max(_time) as lastTime by Computer, process_name, ImageLoaded, OriginalFileName, process_id | rename Computer as dest | `security_content_ctime(firstTime)` | `security_content_ctime(lastTime)` | `windows_installutil_credential_theft_filter`
|
||||
search = `sysmon` EventCode=7 process_name=installutil.exe ImageLoaded IN ("*\\samlib.dll", "*\\vaultcli.dll") | stats count min(_time) as firstTime max(_time) as lastTime by Computer, process_name, ImageLoaded, OriginalFileName, ProcessId | rename Computer as dest | `security_content_ctime(firstTime)` | `security_content_ctime(lastTime)` | `windows_installutil_credential_theft_filter`
|
||||
|
||||
[ESCU - Windows InstallUtil in Non Standard Path - Rule]
|
||||
action.escu = 0
|
||||
@@ -32363,6 +32855,52 @@ realtime_schedule = 0
|
||||
is_visible = false
|
||||
search = `sysmon` EventCode=10 TargetImage=*lsass.exe SourceUser!="NT AUTHORITY\\*" | stats count min(_time) as firstTime max(_time) as lastTime by Computer, TargetImage, GrantedAccess, SourceImage, SourceProcessId, SourceUser, TargetUser | rename Computer as dest | `security_content_ctime(firstTime)`| `security_content_ctime(lastTime)` | `windows_non_system_account_targeting_lsass_filter`
|
||||
|
||||
[ESCU - Windows Office Product Spawning MSDT - Rule]
|
||||
action.escu = 0
|
||||
action.escu.enabled = 1
|
||||
description = The following analytic identifies a Microsoft Office product spawning the Windows msdt.exe process. MSDT is a Diagnostics Troubleshooting Wizard native to Windows. This behavior is related to a recently identified sample utilizing protocol handlers to evade preventative controls, including if macros are disabled in the document. During triage, review file modifications for html. In addition, parallel processes including PowerShell and CertUtil.
|
||||
action.escu.mappings = {"cis20": ["CIS 3", "CIS 5", "CIS 16"], "kill_chain_phases": ["Exploitation"], "mitre_attack": ["T1566", "T1566.001"], "nist": ["DE.CM"]}
|
||||
action.escu.data_models = ["Endpoint"]
|
||||
action.escu.eli5 = The following analytic identifies a Microsoft Office product spawning the Windows msdt.exe process. MSDT is a Diagnostics Troubleshooting Wizard native to Windows. This behavior is related to a recently identified sample utilizing protocol handlers to evade preventative controls, including if macros are disabled in the document. During triage, review file modifications for html. In addition, parallel processes including PowerShell and CertUtil.
|
||||
action.escu.how_to_implement = how To successfully implement this search you need to be ingesting information on process that include the name of the process responsible for the changes from your endpoints into the `Endpoint` datamodel in the `Processes` node. In addition, confirm the latest CIM App 4.20 or higher is installed and the latest TA for the endpoint product.
|
||||
action.escu.known_false_positives = False positives should be limited, however filter as needed.
|
||||
action.escu.creation_date = 2022-05-30
|
||||
action.escu.modification_date = 2022-05-30
|
||||
action.escu.confidence = high
|
||||
action.escu.full_search_name = ESCU - Windows Office Product Spawning MSDT - Rule
|
||||
action.escu.search_type = detection
|
||||
action.escu.product = ["Splunk Enterprise", "Splunk Enterprise Security", "Splunk Cloud"]
|
||||
action.escu.providing_technologies = []
|
||||
action.escu.analytic_story = ["Spearphishing Attachments", "Microsoft Support Diagnostic Tool Vulnerability CVE-2022-30190"]
|
||||
action.risk = 1
|
||||
action.risk.param._risk_message = Office parent process $parent_process_name$ has spawned a child process $process_name$ on host $dest$.
|
||||
action.risk.param._risk = [{"risk_object_field": "user", "risk_object_type": "user", "risk_score": 100}, {"risk_object_field": "dest", "risk_object_type": "system", "risk_score": 100}, {"threat_object_field": "parent_process_name", "threat_object_type": "process"}, {"threat_object_field": "process_name", "threat_object_type": "process"}]
|
||||
action.risk.param._risk_score = 0
|
||||
action.risk.param.verbose = 0
|
||||
cron_schedule = 0 * * * *
|
||||
dispatch.earliest_time = -70m@m
|
||||
dispatch.latest_time = -10m@m
|
||||
action.correlationsearch.enabled = 1
|
||||
action.correlationsearch.label = ESCU - Windows Office Product Spawning MSDT - Rule
|
||||
action.correlationsearch.annotations = {"analytic_story": ["Spearphishing Attachments", "Microsoft Support Diagnostic Tool Vulnerability CVE-2022-30190"], "cis20": ["CIS 3", "CIS 5", "CIS 16"], "confidence": 100, "context": ["Source:Endpoint", "Stage:Defense Evasion"], "cve": ["CVE-2022-30190"], "impact": 100, "kill_chain_phases": ["Exploitation"], "mitre_attack": ["T1566", "T1566.001"], "nist": ["DE.CM"], "observable": [{"name": "user", "role": ["Victim"], "type": "User"}, {"name": "dest", "role": ["Victim"], "type": "Hostname"}, {"name": "parent_process_name", "role": ["Parent Process"], "type": "Process"}, {"name": "process_name", "role": ["Child Process"], "type": "Process"}]}
|
||||
schedule_window = auto
|
||||
action.notable = 1
|
||||
action.notable.param.nes_fields = user,dest
|
||||
action.notable.param.rule_description = The following analytic identifies a Microsoft Office product spawning the Windows msdt.exe process. MSDT is a Diagnostics Troubleshooting Wizard native to Windows. This behavior is related to a recently identified sample utilizing protocol handlers to evade preventative controls, including if macros are disabled in the document. During triage, review file modifications for html. In addition, parallel processes including PowerShell and CertUtil.
|
||||
action.notable.param.rule_title = Windows Office Product Spawning MSDT
|
||||
action.notable.param.security_domain = endpoint
|
||||
action.notable.param.severity = high
|
||||
alert.digest_mode = 1
|
||||
disabled = true
|
||||
enableSched = 1
|
||||
allow_skew = 100%
|
||||
counttype = number of events
|
||||
relation = greater than
|
||||
quantity = 0
|
||||
realtime_schedule = 0
|
||||
is_visible = false
|
||||
search = | tstats `security_content_summariesonly` count min(_time) as firstTime max(_time) as lastTime from datamodel=Endpoint.Processes where Processes.parent_process_name IN ("winword.exe","excel.exe","powerpnt.exe","outlook.exe","mspub.exe","visio.exe") Processes.process_name=msdt.exe by Processes.dest Processes.user Processes.parent_process Processes.process_name Processes.original_file_name Processes.process Processes.process_id Processes.parent_process_id | `drop_dm_object_name(Processes)` | `security_content_ctime(firstTime)`| `security_content_ctime(lastTime)` | `windows_office_product_spawning_msdt_filter`
|
||||
|
||||
[ESCU - Windows Possible Credential Dumping - Rule]
|
||||
action.escu = 0
|
||||
action.escu.enabled = 1
|
||||
@@ -39078,6 +39616,92 @@ realtime_schedule = 0
|
||||
is_visible = false
|
||||
search = `stream_http` http_method=POST form_data IN ("*wermgr.exe*","*svchost.exe*", "*name=\"proclist\"*","*ipconfig*", "*name=\"sysinfo\"*", "*net view*") |stats values(form_data) as http_request_body min(_time) as firstTime max(_time) as lastTime count by http_method http_user_agent uri_path url bytes_in bytes_out | `security_content_ctime(firstTime)` | `security_content_ctime(lastTime)` | `plain_http_post_exfiltrated_data_filter`
|
||||
|
||||
[ESCU - Splunk Identified SSL TLS Certificates - Rule]
|
||||
action.escu = 0
|
||||
action.escu.enabled = 1
|
||||
description = The following analytic uses tags of SSL, TLS and certificate to identify the usage of the Splunk default certificates being utilized in the environment. Recommended guidance is to utilize valid TLS certificates which documentation may be found in Splunk Docs - https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/8.2.6/Security/AboutsecuringyourSplunkconfigurationwithSSL.
|
||||
action.escu.mappings = {"cis20": ["CIS 3", "CIS 5", "CIS 16"], "kill_chain_phases": ["Reconnaissance"], "mitre_attack": ["T1040"], "nist": ["DE.CM"]}
|
||||
action.escu.data_models = []
|
||||
action.escu.eli5 = The following analytic uses tags of SSL, TLS and certificate to identify the usage of the Splunk default certificates being utilized in the environment. Recommended guidance is to utilize valid TLS certificates which documentation may be found in Splunk Docs - https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/8.2.6/Security/AboutsecuringyourSplunkconfigurationwithSSL.
|
||||
action.escu.how_to_implement = Ingestion of SSL/TLS data is needed and to be tagged properly as ssl, tls or certificate. This data may come from a proxy, zeek, or Splunk Streams. Splunk SOAR customers can find a SOAR workbook that walks an analyst through the process of running these hunting searches in the references list of this detection. In order to use this workbook, a user will need to run a curl command to post the file to their SOAR instance such as "curl -u username:password https://soar.instance.name/rest/rest/workbook_template -d @splunk_psa_0622.json". A user should then create an empty container or case, attach the workbook, and begin working through the tasks.
|
||||
action.escu.known_false_positives = False positives will not be present as it is meant to assist with identifying default certificates being utilized.
|
||||
action.escu.creation_date = 2022-05-25
|
||||
action.escu.modification_date = 2022-05-25
|
||||
action.escu.confidence = high
|
||||
action.escu.full_search_name = ESCU - Splunk Identified SSL TLS Certificates - Rule
|
||||
action.escu.search_type = detection
|
||||
action.escu.product = ["Splunk Enterprise", "Splunk Enterprise Security", "Splunk Cloud"]
|
||||
action.escu.providing_technologies = []
|
||||
action.escu.analytic_story = ["Splunk Vulnerabilities"]
|
||||
action.risk = 1
|
||||
action.risk.param._risk_message = The following $dest$ is using the self signed Splunk certificate.
|
||||
action.risk.param._risk = [{"risk_object_field": "dest", "risk_object_type": "system", "risk_score": 42}]
|
||||
action.risk.param._risk_score = 0
|
||||
action.risk.param.verbose = 0
|
||||
cron_schedule = 0 * * * *
|
||||
dispatch.earliest_time = -70m@m
|
||||
dispatch.latest_time = -10m@m
|
||||
action.correlationsearch.enabled = 1
|
||||
action.correlationsearch.label = ESCU - Splunk Identified SSL TLS Certificates - Rule
|
||||
action.correlationsearch.annotations = {"analytic_story": ["Splunk Vulnerabilities"], "cis20": ["CIS 3", "CIS 5", "CIS 16"], "confidence": 70, "context": ["Source:Application Log"], "cve": ["CVE-2022-32151", "CVE-2022-32152"], "impact": 60, "kill_chain_phases": ["Reconnaissance"], "mitre_attack": ["T1040"], "nist": ["DE.CM"], "observable": [{"name": "dest", "role": ["Victim"], "type": "Hostname"}]}
|
||||
schedule_window = auto
|
||||
alert.digest_mode = 1
|
||||
disabled = true
|
||||
enableSched = 1
|
||||
allow_skew = 100%
|
||||
counttype = number of events
|
||||
relation = greater than
|
||||
quantity = 0
|
||||
realtime_schedule = 0
|
||||
is_visible = false
|
||||
search = tag IN (ssl, tls, certificate) ssl_issuer_common_name=*splunk* | stats values(src) AS "Host(s) with Default Cert" count by ssl_issuer ssl_subject_common_name ssl_subject_organization ssl_subject host sourcetype | `splunk_identified_ssl_tls_certificates_filter`
|
||||
|
||||
[ESCU - Confluence Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution CVE-2022-26134 - Rule]
|
||||
action.escu = 0
|
||||
action.escu.enabled = 1
|
||||
description = The following analytic assists with identifying CVE-2022-26134 based exploitation utilizing the Web datamodel to cover network and CIM compliant web logs. The parameters were captured from live scanning and the POC provided by Rapid7. This analytic is written against multiple proof of concept codes released and seen in the wild (scanning). During triage, review any endpoint based logs for further activity including writing a jsp file to disk and commands/processes spawning running as root from the Confluence process.
|
||||
action.escu.mappings = {"cis20": ["CIS 3", "CIS 5", "CIS 16"], "kill_chain_phases": ["Exploitation"], "mitre_attack": ["T1505", "T1190"], "nist": ["DE.CM"]}
|
||||
action.escu.data_models = ["Endpoint"]
|
||||
action.escu.eli5 = The following analytic assists with identifying CVE-2022-26134 based exploitation utilizing the Web datamodel to cover network and CIM compliant web logs. The parameters were captured from live scanning and the POC provided by Rapid7. This analytic is written against multiple proof of concept codes released and seen in the wild (scanning). During triage, review any endpoint based logs for further activity including writing a jsp file to disk and commands/processes spawning running as root from the Confluence process.
|
||||
action.escu.how_to_implement = This detection requires the Web datamodel to be populated from a supported Technology Add-On like Splunk for Apache or Splunk for Nginx. In addition, network based logs or event data like PAN Threat.
|
||||
action.escu.known_false_positives = Tune based on assets if possible, or restrict to known Confluence servers. Remove the ${ for a more broad query. To identify more exec, remove everything up to the last parameter (Runtime().exec) for a broad query.
|
||||
action.escu.creation_date = 2022-06-03
|
||||
action.escu.modification_date = 2022-06-03
|
||||
action.escu.confidence = high
|
||||
action.escu.full_search_name = ESCU - Confluence Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution CVE-2022-26134 - Rule
|
||||
action.escu.search_type = detection
|
||||
action.escu.product = ["Splunk Enterprise", "Splunk Enterprise Security", "Splunk Cloud"]
|
||||
action.escu.providing_technologies = []
|
||||
action.escu.analytic_story = ["Atlassian Confluence Server and Data Center CVE-2022-26134"]
|
||||
action.risk = 1
|
||||
action.risk.param._risk_message = A URL was requested related to CVE-2022-26134, a unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability, on $dest$ by $src$.
|
||||
action.risk.param._risk = [{"risk_object_field": "dest", "risk_object_type": "system", "risk_score": 100}, {"risk_object_field": "src", "risk_object_type": "system", "risk_score": 100}]
|
||||
action.risk.param._risk_score = 0
|
||||
action.risk.param.verbose = 0
|
||||
cron_schedule = 0 * * * *
|
||||
dispatch.earliest_time = -70m@m
|
||||
dispatch.latest_time = -10m@m
|
||||
action.correlationsearch.enabled = 1
|
||||
action.correlationsearch.label = ESCU - Confluence Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution CVE-2022-26134 - Rule
|
||||
action.correlationsearch.annotations = {"analytic_story": ["Atlassian Confluence Server and Data Center CVE-2022-26134"], "cis20": ["CIS 3", "CIS 5", "CIS 16"], "confidence": 100, "context": ["Scope:Network"], "cve": ["CVE-2022-26134"], "impact": 100, "kill_chain_phases": ["Exploitation"], "mitre_attack": ["T1505", "T1190"], "nist": ["DE.CM"], "observable": [{"name": "dest", "role": ["Victim"], "type": "IP Address"}, {"name": "src", "role": ["Attacker"], "type": "IP Address"}]}
|
||||
schedule_window = auto
|
||||
action.notable = 1
|
||||
action.notable.param.nes_fields = user,dest
|
||||
action.notable.param.rule_description = The following analytic assists with identifying CVE-2022-26134 based exploitation utilizing the Web datamodel to cover network and CIM compliant web logs. The parameters were captured from live scanning and the POC provided by Rapid7. This analytic is written against multiple proof of concept codes released and seen in the wild (scanning). During triage, review any endpoint based logs for further activity including writing a jsp file to disk and commands/processes spawning running as root from the Confluence process.
|
||||
action.notable.param.rule_title = Confluence Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution CVE-2022-26134
|
||||
action.notable.param.security_domain = network
|
||||
action.notable.param.severity = high
|
||||
alert.digest_mode = 1
|
||||
disabled = true
|
||||
enableSched = 1
|
||||
allow_skew = 100%
|
||||
counttype = number of events
|
||||
relation = greater than
|
||||
quantity = 0
|
||||
realtime_schedule = 0
|
||||
is_visible = false
|
||||
search = | tstats count min(_time) as firstTime max(_time) as lastTime from datamodel=Web where Web.url IN ("*${*", "*%2F%7B*") (Web.url="*org.apache.commons.io.IOUtils*" Web.url="*java.lang.Runtime@getRuntime().exec*") OR (Web.url="*java.lang.Runtime%40getRuntime%28%29.exec*") OR (Web.url="*getEngineByName*" AND Web.url="*nashorn*" AND Web.url="*ProcessBuilder*") by Web.http_user_agent Web.http_method, Web.url,Web.url_length Web.src, Web.dest sourcetype | `drop_dm_object_name("Web")` | `security_content_ctime(firstTime)` | `security_content_ctime(lastTime)` | `confluence_unauthenticated_remote_code_execution_cve_2022_26134_filter`
|
||||
|
||||
[ESCU - Log4Shell JNDI Payload Injection Attempt - Rule]
|
||||
action.escu = 0
|
||||
action.escu.enabled = 1
|
||||
@@ -40730,6 +41354,28 @@ disabled = true
|
||||
is_visible = false
|
||||
search = | tstats `security_content_summariesonly` min(_time) as firstTimeSeen max(_time) as lastTimeSeen from datamodel=Endpoint.Processes where (Processes.parent_process_name=zoom.exe OR Processes.parent_process_name=zoom.us) by Processes.process_name Processes.dest| `drop_dm_object_name(Processes)` | table firstTimeSeen, lastTimeSeen, process_name, dest | inputlookup zoom_first_time_child_process append=t | stats min(firstTimeSeen) as firstTimeSeen max(lastTimeSeen) as lastTimeSeen by process_name, dest | where lastTimeSeen > relative_time(now(), "`previously_seen_zoom_child_processes_forget_window`") | outputlookup zoom_first_time_child_process
|
||||
|
||||
[ESCU - Splunk Command and Scripting Interpreter Risky SPL MLTK Baseline]
|
||||
action.escu = 0
|
||||
action.escu.enabled = 1
|
||||
action.escu.search_type = support
|
||||
action.escu.full_search_name = ESCU - Splunk Command and Scripting Interpreter Risky SPL MLTK Baseline
|
||||
description = This search supports an analyst looking for abuse or misuse of the risky commands listed here: https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/latest/Security/SPLsafeguards#Commands_that_trigger_the_warning This is accomplished by using the time spent executing one of these risky commands as a proxy for misuse/abuse of interest during investigation and/or hunting. The search builds a model utilizes the MLTK DensityFunction algorithm on Splunk app audit log data. The model uses the past 7 days of user history executing the above referenced commands then aggregates the total search run time for each hour as indicator of user behavior. The model identifies the top 0.1% of user search run time, indicating a risky use of these commands. Users can adjust this threshold 0.1% as interested however this will correlate to missed/false positive rates. This search should be scheduled to run at least every 7 days. The name of machine learning model generated is "risky_command_abuse" and should be configured to be globally shared (not private) in MLTK app as documented here: https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/MLApp/5.3.1/User/Models#Sharing_models_from_other_Splunk_apps unless the same account of training this model will be used to perform inference using this model for anomaly detection.
|
||||
action.escu.creation_date = 2022-05-27
|
||||
action.escu.modification_date = 2022-05-27
|
||||
action.escu.analytic_story = ["Splunk Vulnerabilities"]
|
||||
action.escu.data_models = ["Splunk_Audit"]
|
||||
cron_schedule = 0 * * * *
|
||||
enableSched = 1
|
||||
dispatch.earliest_time = -70m@m
|
||||
dispatch.latest_time = -10m@m
|
||||
schedule_window = auto
|
||||
action.escu.providing_technologies = []
|
||||
action.escu.eli5 = This search supports an analyst looking for abuse or misuse of the risky commands listed here: https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/latest/Security/SPLsafeguards#Commands_that_trigger_the_warning This is accomplished by using the time spent executing one of these risky commands as a proxy for misuse/abuse of interest during investigation and/or hunting. The search builds a model utilizes the MLTK DensityFunction algorithm on Splunk app audit log data. The model uses the past 7 days of user history executing the above referenced commands then aggregates the total search run time for each hour as indicator of user behavior. The model identifies the top 0.1% of user search run time, indicating a risky use of these commands. Users can adjust this threshold 0.1% as interested however this will correlate to missed/false positive rates. This search should be scheduled to run at least every 7 days. The name of machine learning model generated is "risky_command_abuse" and should be configured to be globally shared (not private) in MLTK app as documented here: https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/MLApp/5.3.1/User/Models#Sharing_models_from_other_Splunk_apps unless the same account of training this model will be used to perform inference using this model for anomaly detection.
|
||||
action.escu.how_to_implement = The corresponding detection of using this model is "Splunk Command and Scripting Interpreter Risky SPL MLTK". This detection depends on MLTK app which can be found here - https://splunkbase.splunk.com/app/2890/ and it assumes Splunk accelerated audit data model is available. For large enterprises, training the model might take significant computing resources. It might require dedicated search head. The underlined machine learning algorithm this detection used is DensityFunction. It might need to increase its settings default values, such as max_fit_time, max_groups, etc. More details of achieving optimal performance and configuring DensityFunction parameters can be found here - https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/MLApp/5.3.1/User/Configurefitandapply Users can modify earliest=-7d@d in the search to other value so that the search can collect enough data points to build a good baseline model. Users can also modify list of risky commands in "Search_Activity.search IN" to better suit users' violation policy and their usage environment.
|
||||
disabled = true
|
||||
is_visible = false
|
||||
search = | tstats sum(Search_Activity.total_run_time) as run_time, count FROM datamodel=Splunk_Audit.Search_Activity WHERE (Search_Activity.user!="") AND (Search_Activity.total_run_time>1) AND (earliest=-7d@d latest=now) AND (Search_Activity.search IN ("*| runshellscript *", "*| collect *","*| delete *", "*| fit *", "*| outputcsv *", "*| outputlookup *", "*| run *", "*| script *", "*| sendalert *", "*| sendemail *", "*| tscolle*")) AND (Search_Activity.search_type=adhoc) AND (Search_Activity.user!=splunk-system-user) BY _time, Search_Activity.user span=1h | fit DensityFunction "run_time" dist=auto lower_threshold=0.000001 upper_threshold=0.001 show_density=true by Search_Activity.user into "risky_command_abuse"
|
||||
|
||||
[ESCU - Systems Ready for Spectre-Meltdown Windows Patch]
|
||||
action.escu = 0
|
||||
action.escu.enabled = 1
|
||||
|
||||
Vendored
+1
-1
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
||||
#############
|
||||
# Automatically generated by generator.py in splunk/security_content
|
||||
# On Date: 2022-05-23T20:35:38 UTC
|
||||
# On Date: 2022-06-14T13:52:57 UTC
|
||||
# Author: Splunk Security Research
|
||||
# Contact: research@splunk.com
|
||||
#############
|
||||
|
||||
+1
-1
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
||||
#############
|
||||
# Automatically generated by generator.py in splunk/security_content
|
||||
# On Date: 2022-05-23T20:35:38 UTC
|
||||
# On Date: 2022-06-14T13:52:57 UTC
|
||||
# Author: Splunk Security Research
|
||||
# Contact: research@splunk.com
|
||||
#############
|
||||
|
||||
+97
-99
@@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ T1584.002,DNS Server,Resource Development,no
|
||||
T1584.001,Domains,Resource Development,Kimsuky|Lazarus Group|Transparent Tribe|Magic Hound|APT29|APT1
|
||||
T1583.006,Web Services,Resource Development,APT28|Confucius|LazyScripter|Kimsuky|Magic Hound|IndigoZebra|ZIRCONIUM|MuddyWater|HAFNIUM|Lazarus Group|Turla|APT32|APT17|APT29
|
||||
T1583.005,Botnet,Resource Development,no
|
||||
T1583.004,Server,Resource Development,Kimsuky|Lazarus Group|Gelsemium|GALLIUM|Sandworm Team
|
||||
T1583.004,Server,Resource Development,Kimsuky|Lazarus Group|GALLIUM|Sandworm Team
|
||||
T1583.003,Virtual Private Server,Resource Development,Axiom|Dragonfly|HAFNIUM|TEMP.Veles
|
||||
T1583.002,DNS Server,Resource Development,Axiom
|
||||
T1584,Compromise Infrastructure,Resource Development,no
|
||||
@@ -174,9 +174,9 @@ T1546.015,Component Object Model Hijacking,Privilege Escalation|Persistence,APT2
|
||||
T1071.004,DNS,Command And Control,LazyScripter|Chimera|APT39|Tropic Trooper|OilRig|Ke3chang|Cobalt Group|APT18|APT41|FIN7
|
||||
T1071.003,Mail Protocols,Command And Control,Turla|Kimsuky|APT32|SilverTerrier|APT28
|
||||
T1071.002,File Transfer Protocols,Command And Control,Kimsuky|APT41|SilverTerrier|Honeybee
|
||||
T1071.001,Web Protocols,Command And Control,Kimsuky|Confucius|TeamTNT|FIN8|APT29|Mustang Panda|Windshift|TA551|Higaisa|HAFNIUM|Sidewinder|Chimera|Sandworm Team|TA505|Rocke|APT39|Tropic Trooper|MuddyWater|Wizard Spider|Inception|APT41|SilverTerrier|APT28|WIRTE|APT33|FIN4|Night Dragon|APT18|APT38|Rancor|Ke3chang|Orangeworm|APT37|APT19|Cobalt Group|Threat Group-3390|Dark Caracal|Turla|Lazarus Group|BRONZE BUTLER|Magic Hound|APT32|OilRig|Gamaredon Group|Stealth Falcon
|
||||
T1071.001,Web Protocols,Command And Control,Kimsuky|Confucius|TeamTNT|FIN8|APT29|Mustang Panda|Windshift|TA551|Higaisa|HAFNIUM|Sidewinder|Chimera|Sandworm Team|TA505|Rocke|APT39|Tropic Trooper|MuddyWater|Wizard Spider|Inception|APT41|SilverTerrier|APT28|WIRTE|APT33|FIN4|Night Dragon|APT18|APT38|Dark Caracal|Cobalt Group|Orangeworm|Rancor|Threat Group-3390|Turla|APT19|APT37|Ke3chang|Lazarus Group|BRONZE BUTLER|Magic Hound|OilRig|APT32|Gamaredon Group|Stealth Falcon
|
||||
T1572,Protocol Tunneling,Command And Control,Leviathan|CostaRicto|Chimera|Fox Kitten|OilRig|Cobalt Group|FIN6
|
||||
T1048.003,Exfiltration Over Unencrypted/Obfuscated Non-C2 Protocol,Exfiltration,Wizard Spider|FIN6|APT32|APT33|Thrip|FIN8|OilRig|Lazarus Group
|
||||
T1048.003,Exfiltration Over Unencrypted Non-C2 Protocol,Exfiltration,Wizard Spider|FIN6|APT32|APT33|Thrip|FIN8|OilRig|Lazarus Group
|
||||
T1048.002,Exfiltration Over Asymmetric Encrypted Non-C2 Protocol,Exfiltration,APT28|APT29
|
||||
T1048.001,Exfiltration Over Symmetric Encrypted Non-C2 Protocol,Exfiltration,no
|
||||
T1001.003,Protocol Impersonation,Command And Control,Higaisa|Lazarus Group
|
||||
@@ -189,18 +189,18 @@ T1090.003,Multi-hop Proxy,Command And Control,Leviathan|CostaRicto|APT28|Operati
|
||||
T1090.002,External Proxy,Command And Control,Tonto Team|APT39|Silence|GALLIUM|MuddyWater|APT3|FIN5|Lazarus Group|menuPass|APT28
|
||||
T1090.001,Internal Proxy,Command And Control,Lazarus Group|Turla|APT29|Higaisa|Operation Wocao|APT39|Strider
|
||||
T1102.003,One-Way Communication,Command And Control,Leviathan
|
||||
T1102.002,Bidirectional Communication,Command And Control,Kimsuky|Lazarus Group|ZIRCONIUM|MuddyWater|APT28|APT29|Sandworm Team|APT39|APT12|Turla|FIN7|APT37|Magic Hound|Carbanak
|
||||
T1102.002,Bidirectional Communication,Command And Control,Kimsuky|Lazarus Group|ZIRCONIUM|MuddyWater|APT28|APT29|Sandworm Team|APT39|APT12|FIN7|Turla|APT37|Magic Hound|Carbanak
|
||||
T1102.001,Dead Drop Resolver,Command And Control,Rocke|APT41|BRONZE BUTLER|RTM|Patchwork
|
||||
T1571,Non-Standard Port,Command And Control,WIRTE|Sandworm Team|Rocke|DarkVishnya|Silence|APT-C-36|Magic Hound|APT33|APT32|TEMP.Veles|Lazarus Group|FIN7
|
||||
T1074.002,Remote Data Staging,Collection,Leviathan|APT28|APT29|Chimera|Threat Group-3390|menuPass|FIN6|Night Dragon|FIN8
|
||||
T1074.001,Local Data Staging,Collection,Dragonfly|Indrik Spider|BackdoorDiplomacy|Mustang Panda|Sidewinder|Chimera|Kimsuky|APT39|Operation Wocao|GALLIUM|TEMP.Veles|Patchwork|Honeybee|Dragonfly 2.0|Leviathan|APT3|FIN5|menuPass|Lazarus Group|Threat Group-3390|APT28
|
||||
T1074.001,Local Data Staging,Collection,Dragonfly|Indrik Spider|BackdoorDiplomacy|Mustang Panda|Sidewinder|Chimera|Kimsuky|APT39|Operation Wocao|GALLIUM|TEMP.Veles|Honeybee|Patchwork|Leviathan|APT3|FIN5|menuPass|Lazarus Group|Threat Group-3390|APT28
|
||||
T1078.004,Cloud Accounts,Defense Evasion|Persistence|Privilege Escalation|Initial Access,Ke3chang|APT29|APT28|APT33
|
||||
T1564.004,NTFS File Attributes,Defense Evasion,APT32
|
||||
T1564.003,Hidden Window,Defense Evasion,Gamaredon Group|Kimsuky|Nomadic Octopus|Higaisa|Gorgon Group|Deep Panda|DarkHydrus|CopyKittens|APT19|APT32|APT28|APT3|Magic Hound
|
||||
T1078.003,Local Accounts,Defense Evasion|Persistence|Privilege Escalation|Initial Access,APT29|Kimsuky|HAFNIUM|Turla|Operation Wocao|PROMETHIUM|Tropic Trooper|FIN10|APT32
|
||||
T1078.002,Domain Accounts,Defense Evasion|Persistence|Privilege Escalation|Initial Access,Naikon|Indrik Spider|Chimera|Operation Wocao|Sandworm Team|Wizard Spider|APT29|TA505|APT3|Threat Group-1314
|
||||
T1078.001,Default Accounts,Defense Evasion|Persistence|Privilege Escalation|Initial Access,no
|
||||
T1564.002,Hidden Users,Defense Evasion,Kimsuky|Dragonfly|Dragonfly 2.0
|
||||
T1564.002,Hidden Users,Defense Evasion,Kimsuky|Dragonfly
|
||||
T1574.006,Dynamic Linker Hijacking,Persistence|Privilege Escalation|Defense Evasion,APT41|Rocke
|
||||
T1574.002,DLL Side-Loading,Persistence|Privilege Escalation|Defense Evasion,Lazarus Group|Mustang Panda|Higaisa|BlackTech|Sidewinder|Chimera|BRONZE BUTLER|Naikon|APT41|GALLIUM|Tropic Trooper|APT19|Patchwork|APT32|APT3|menuPass|Threat Group-3390
|
||||
T1574.001,DLL Search Order Hijacking,Persistence|Privilege Escalation|Defense Evasion,Aquatic Panda|BackdoorDiplomacy|Tonto Team|Evilnum|APT41|Whitefly|RTM|Threat Group-3390|menuPass
|
||||
@@ -214,10 +214,10 @@ T1574,Hijack Execution Flow,Persistence|Privilege Escalation|Defense Evasion,no
|
||||
T1069.001,Local Groups,Discovery,Tonto Team|Chimera|Operation Wocao|Turla|OilRig|admin@338
|
||||
T1570,Lateral Tool Transfer,Lateral Movement,Sandworm Team|Chimera|GALLIUM|Operation Wocao|APT32|Wizard Spider|Turla|FIN10
|
||||
T1568.003,DNS Calculation,Command And Control,APT12
|
||||
T1204.002,Malicious File,Execution,LazyScripter|WIRTE|Confucius|Dragonfly|Threat Group-3390|Nomadic Octopus|Indrik Spider|APT38|Andariel|Ferocious Kitten|IndigoZebra|Transparent Tribe|Tonto Team|Magic Hound|Ajax Security Team|Mustang Panda|TA551|Higaisa|Sidewinder|Kimsuky|FIN6|PROMETHIUM|APT30|Windshift|APT33|Sandworm Team|Naikon|Whitefly|Tropic Trooper|Gamaredon Group|Sharpshooter|Molerats|Wizard Spider|Mofang|Frankenstein|RTM|Inception|BlackTech|APT-C-36|Machete|admin@338|APT12|TA505|Silence|The White Company|APT39|FIN4|Darkhotel|Gallmaker|Dragonfly 2.0|FIN7|BRONZE BUTLER|Gorgon Group|OilRig|Dark Caracal|Cobalt Group|DarkHydrus|Rancor|Patchwork|APT32|APT19|MuddyWater|Lazarus Group|menuPass|APT37|Leviathan|TA459|APT29|APT28|FIN8|PLATINUM|Elderwood
|
||||
T1204.001,Malicious Link,Execution,LazyScripter|Kimsuky|Lazarus Group|Confucius|FIN7|Transparent Tribe|APT3|Magic Hound|APT28|APT29|Mustang Panda|Sidewinder|ZIRCONIUM|MuddyWater|Evilnum|Sandworm Team|Wizard Spider|Patchwork|Windshift|APT32|Molerats|Mofang|BlackTech|TA505|OilRig|Machete|Leviathan|FIN8|FIN4|Elderwood|Dragonfly 2.0|Cobalt Group|APT39|Night Dragon|Turla|APT33
|
||||
T1204.002,Malicious File,Execution,LazyScripter|WIRTE|Confucius|Dragonfly|Threat Group-3390|Nomadic Octopus|Indrik Spider|APT38|Andariel|Ferocious Kitten|IndigoZebra|Transparent Tribe|Tonto Team|Magic Hound|Ajax Security Team|Mustang Panda|TA551|Higaisa|Sidewinder|Kimsuky|FIN6|PROMETHIUM|APT30|Windshift|APT33|Sandworm Team|Naikon|Whitefly|Tropic Trooper|Gamaredon Group|Sharpshooter|Molerats|Wizard Spider|Mofang|Frankenstein|RTM|Inception|BlackTech|APT-C-36|Machete|admin@338|APT12|TA505|Silence|The White Company|APT39|FIN4|Darkhotel|Gallmaker|Patchwork|Lazarus Group|MuddyWater|Rancor|Gorgon Group|OilRig|FIN7|APT32|BRONZE BUTLER|Cobalt Group|APT19|DarkHydrus|Dark Caracal|PLATINUM|menuPass|Leviathan|APT28|APT29|TA459|APT37|Elderwood|FIN8
|
||||
T1204.001,Malicious Link,Execution,LazyScripter|Kimsuky|Lazarus Group|Confucius|FIN7|Transparent Tribe|APT3|Magic Hound|APT28|APT29|Mustang Panda|Sidewinder|ZIRCONIUM|MuddyWater|Evilnum|Sandworm Team|Wizard Spider|Patchwork|Windshift|APT32|Molerats|Mofang|BlackTech|TA505|OilRig|Machete|Leviathan|FIN8|FIN4|Elderwood|Cobalt Group|APT39|Night Dragon|APT33|Turla
|
||||
T1195.003,Compromise Hardware Supply Chain,Initial Access,no
|
||||
T1195.002,Compromise Software Supply Chain,Initial Access,Gelsemium|Threat Group-3390|APT29|Cobalt Group|GOLD SOUTHFIELD|Dragonfly|Sandworm Team|APT41
|
||||
T1195.002,Compromise Software Supply Chain,Initial Access,Threat Group-3390|APT29|Cobalt Group|GOLD SOUTHFIELD|Dragonfly|Sandworm Team|APT41
|
||||
T1195.001,Compromise Software Dependencies and Development Tools,Initial Access,no
|
||||
T1568.001,Fast Flux DNS,Command And Control,menuPass|TA505
|
||||
T1052.001,Exfiltration over USB,Exfiltration,Mustang Panda|Tropic Trooper
|
||||
@@ -225,16 +225,16 @@ T1569.002,Service Execution,Execution,APT38|Chimera|Operation Wocao|Wizard Spide
|
||||
T1569.001,Launchctl,Execution,no
|
||||
T1569,System Services,Execution,no
|
||||
T1568.002,Domain Generation Algorithms,Command And Control,TA551|APT41
|
||||
T1568,Dynamic Resolution,Command And Control,Gamaredon Group|Gelsemium|Transparent Tribe|APT29
|
||||
T1568,Dynamic Resolution,Command And Control,Gamaredon Group|Transparent Tribe|APT29
|
||||
T1011.001,Exfiltration Over Bluetooth,Exfiltration,no
|
||||
T1567.002,Exfiltration to Cloud Storage,Exfiltration,Kimsuky|Threat Group-3390|Confucius|Lazarus Group|FIN7|ZIRCONIUM|HAFNIUM|Chimera|Leviathan|Turla
|
||||
T1567.001,Exfiltration to Code Repository,Exfiltration,no
|
||||
T1059.006,Python,Execution,Dragonfly|Tonto Team|APT37|ZIRCONIUM|MuddyWater|Turla|Operation Wocao|Kimsuky|APT29|Rocke|BRONZE BUTLER|APT39|Dragonfly 2.0|Machete
|
||||
T1059.005,Visual Basic,Execution,Confucius|Lazarus Group|LazyScripter|OilRig|APT38|Transparent Tribe|APT29|Mustang Panda|Windshift|Higaisa|Sidewinder|APT39|Machete|Operation Wocao|Kimsuky|APT33|Sandworm Team|Gamaredon Group|Sharpshooter|Molerats|Frankenstein|Inception|APT-C-36|Rancor|Patchwork|MuddyWater|Honeybee|FIN7|APT37|BRONZE BUTLER|APT32|Turla|TA505|Silence|WIRTE|FIN4|Cobalt Group|Gorgon Group|Leviathan|TA459|Magic Hound
|
||||
T1059.006,Python,Execution,Dragonfly|Tonto Team|APT37|ZIRCONIUM|MuddyWater|Turla|Operation Wocao|Kimsuky|APT29|Rocke|BRONZE BUTLER|APT39|Machete
|
||||
T1059.005,Visual Basic,Execution,Confucius|Lazarus Group|LazyScripter|OilRig|APT38|Transparent Tribe|APT29|Mustang Panda|Windshift|Higaisa|Sidewinder|APT39|Machete|Operation Wocao|Kimsuky|APT33|Sandworm Team|Gamaredon Group|Sharpshooter|Molerats|Frankenstein|Inception|APT-C-36|Rancor|Patchwork|MuddyWater|Honeybee|FIN7|APT37|BRONZE BUTLER|APT32|Turla|TA505|Silence|WIRTE|FIN4|Gorgon Group|Cobalt Group|Leviathan|TA459|Magic Hound
|
||||
T1059.004,Unix Shell,Execution,TeamTNT|Rocke|APT41
|
||||
T1059.003,Windows Command Shell,Execution,Kimsuky|Aquatic Panda|Dragonfly|LazyScripter|Sandworm Team|Nomadic Octopus|TeamTNT|APT29|Mustang Panda|ZIRCONIUM|TA551|Higaisa|Indrik Spider|Chimera|Fox Kitten|Machete|Operation Wocao|Wizard Spider|FIN6|TA505|Blue Mockingbird|Tropic Trooper|Frankenstein|OilRig|Lazarus Group|Honeybee|Cobalt Group|FIN7|APT41|GALLIUM|Turla|Silence|APT32|Darkhotel|MuddyWater|APT18|APT38|Gorgon Group|Dark Caracal|Ke3chang|Dragonfly 2.0|Rancor|FIN8|APT28|APT37|Magic Hound|BRONZE BUTLER|Sowbug|menuPass|FIN10|Threat Group-3390|Gamaredon Group|Patchwork|Suckfly|Threat Group-1314|APT3|admin@338|APT1
|
||||
T1059.003,Windows Command Shell,Execution,Kimsuky|Aquatic Panda|Dragonfly|LazyScripter|Sandworm Team|Nomadic Octopus|TeamTNT|APT29|Mustang Panda|ZIRCONIUM|TA551|Higaisa|Indrik Spider|Chimera|Fox Kitten|Machete|Operation Wocao|Wizard Spider|FIN6|TA505|Blue Mockingbird|Tropic Trooper|Frankenstein|OilRig|Lazarus Group|Honeybee|Cobalt Group|FIN7|APT41|GALLIUM|Turla|Silence|APT32|Darkhotel|MuddyWater|APT18|APT38|Dark Caracal|Ke3chang|Gorgon Group|Rancor|FIN8|APT28|APT37|Magic Hound|BRONZE BUTLER|Sowbug|menuPass|FIN10|Threat Group-3390|Gamaredon Group|Suckfly|Patchwork|Threat Group-1314|APT3|admin@338|APT1
|
||||
T1059.002,AppleScript,Execution,no
|
||||
T1059.001,PowerShell,Execution,Gamaredon Group|Lazarus Group|Aquatic Panda|Confucius|Dragonfly|LazyScripter|Nomadic Octopus|TeamTNT|APT38|Tonto Team|Mustang Panda|Indrik Spider|HAFNIUM|Sidewinder|Fox Kitten|GOLD SOUTHFIELD|Sandworm Team|Operation Wocao|Chimera|Blue Mockingbird|APT39|DarkVishnya|Molerats|Wizard Spider|Frankenstein|Inception|Silence|APT41|Kimsuky|GALLIUM|TA505|WIRTE|TEMP.Veles|APT33|Gallmaker|Turla|Thrip|Cobalt Group|APT28|DarkHydrus|Dragonfly 2.0|APT19|Gorgon Group|TA459|Leviathan|MuddyWater|FIN8|CopyKittens|OilRig|Magic Hound|BRONZE BUTLER|FIN7|APT32|menuPass|FIN10|Threat Group-3390|Patchwork|Stealth Falcon|FIN6|Poseidon Group|APT3|APT29|Deep Panda
|
||||
T1059.001,PowerShell,Execution,Gamaredon Group|Lazarus Group|Aquatic Panda|Confucius|Dragonfly|LazyScripter|Nomadic Octopus|TeamTNT|APT38|Tonto Team|Mustang Panda|Indrik Spider|HAFNIUM|Sidewinder|Fox Kitten|GOLD SOUTHFIELD|Sandworm Team|Operation Wocao|Chimera|Blue Mockingbird|APT39|DarkVishnya|Molerats|Wizard Spider|Frankenstein|Inception|Silence|APT41|Kimsuky|GALLIUM|TA505|WIRTE|TEMP.Veles|APT33|Gallmaker|APT19|DarkHydrus|APT28|Turla|Gorgon Group|Thrip|Cobalt Group|Leviathan|MuddyWater|FIN8|TA459|CopyKittens|OilRig|BRONZE BUTLER|Magic Hound|Threat Group-3390|FIN10|APT32|FIN7|menuPass|Patchwork|Stealth Falcon|FIN6|Poseidon Group|APT3|APT29|Deep Panda
|
||||
T1567,Exfiltration Over Web Service,Exfiltration,APT28
|
||||
T1497.003,Time Based Evasion,Defense Evasion|Discovery,no
|
||||
T1497.002,User Activity Based Checks,Defense Evasion|Discovery,Darkhotel|FIN7
|
||||
@@ -242,40 +242,40 @@ T1497.001,System Checks,Defense Evasion|Discovery,Lazarus Group|OilRig|Darkhotel
|
||||
T1498.002,Reflection Amplification,Impact,no
|
||||
T1498.001,Direct Network Flood,Impact,no
|
||||
T1566.003,Spearphishing via Service,Initial Access,Lazarus Group|APT29|Ajax Security Team|Magic Hound|Windshift|FIN6|OilRig|Dark Caracal
|
||||
T1566.002,Spearphishing Link,Initial Access,Lazarus Group|Confucius|LazyScripter|Transparent Tribe|FIN7|APT3|Mustang Panda|ZIRCONIUM|MuddyWater|Sidewinder|Evilnum|Sandworm Team|Wizard Spider|APT1|Windshift|Molerats|Mofang|BlackTech|Machete|Kimsuky|TA505|APT39|FIN4|APT32|Night Dragon|APT28|Cobalt Group|Turla|Dragonfly 2.0|OilRig|Elderwood|APT33|APT29|Leviathan|FIN8|Patchwork|Magic Hound
|
||||
T1566.001,Spearphishing Attachment,Initial Access,WIRTE|Confucius|Dragonfly|LazyScripter|Threat Group-3390|APT38|Andariel|Ferocious Kitten|IndigoZebra|Transparent Tribe|Nomadic Octopus|Tonto Team|Ajax Security Team|Mustang Panda|TA551|Higaisa|Sidewinder|APT1|FIN6|APT30|Windshift|APT33|Sandworm Team|Naikon|Gamaredon Group|Sharpshooter|Molerats|Mofang|Wizard Spider|RTM|Frankenstein|Inception|BlackTech|APT-C-36|APT41|Machete|admin@338|Kimsuky|APT12|TA505|Silence|The White Company|APT39|FIN4|Darkhotel|Gallmaker|Tropic Trooper|DarkHydrus|Lazarus Group|Gorgon Group|OilRig|BRONZE BUTLER|APT19|APT32|Cobalt Group|Rancor|FIN7|Dragonfly 2.0|MuddyWater|APT28|TA459|APT29|APT37|Leviathan|FIN8|Patchwork|menuPass|Elderwood|PLATINUM
|
||||
T1566,Phishing,Initial Access,Axiom|GOLD SOUTHFIELD|Dragonfly
|
||||
T1566.002,Spearphishing Link,Initial Access,Lazarus Group|Confucius|LazyScripter|Transparent Tribe|FIN7|APT3|Mustang Panda|ZIRCONIUM|MuddyWater|Sidewinder|Evilnum|Sandworm Team|Wizard Spider|APT1|Windshift|Molerats|Mofang|BlackTech|Machete|Kimsuky|TA505|APT39|FIN4|APT32|Night Dragon|Cobalt Group|APT28|Turla|OilRig|APT33|Patchwork|Magic Hound|APT29|FIN8|Elderwood|Leviathan
|
||||
T1566.001,Spearphishing Attachment,Initial Access,WIRTE|Confucius|Dragonfly|LazyScripter|Threat Group-3390|APT38|Andariel|Ferocious Kitten|IndigoZebra|Transparent Tribe|Nomadic Octopus|Tonto Team|Ajax Security Team|Mustang Panda|TA551|Higaisa|Sidewinder|APT1|FIN6|APT30|Windshift|APT33|Sandworm Team|Naikon|Gamaredon Group|Sharpshooter|Molerats|Mofang|Wizard Spider|RTM|Frankenstein|Inception|BlackTech|APT-C-36|APT41|Machete|admin@338|Kimsuky|APT12|TA505|Silence|The White Company|APT39|FIN4|Darkhotel|Gallmaker|Tropic Trooper|APT19|Gorgon Group|Cobalt Group|FIN7|Rancor|APT32|BRONZE BUTLER|OilRig|Lazarus Group|DarkHydrus|Patchwork|APT28|Leviathan|menuPass|APT29|FIN8|PLATINUM|Elderwood|APT37|TA459|MuddyWater
|
||||
T1566,Phishing,Initial Access,Axiom|GOLD SOUTHFIELD
|
||||
T1565.003,Runtime Data Manipulation,Impact,APT38
|
||||
T1565.002,Transmitted Data Manipulation,Impact,APT38
|
||||
T1565.001,Stored Data Manipulation,Impact,APT38
|
||||
T1565,Data Manipulation,Impact,no
|
||||
T1564.001,Hidden Files and Directories,Defense Evasion,Transparent Tribe|Mustang Panda|Rocke|APT32|Tropic Trooper|APT28|Lazarus Group
|
||||
T1564.001,Hidden Files and Directories,Defense Evasion,Transparent Tribe|Mustang Panda|Rocke|APT32|Tropic Trooper|Lazarus Group|APT28
|
||||
T1564,Hide Artifacts,Defense Evasion,no
|
||||
T1563.002,RDP Hijacking,Lateral Movement,Axiom
|
||||
T1563.001,SSH Hijacking,Lateral Movement,no
|
||||
T1563,Remote Service Session Hijacking,Lateral Movement,no
|
||||
T1518.001,Security Software Discovery,Discovery,Kimsuky|Aquatic Panda|TeamTNT|APT38|Windshift|Sidewinder|Operation Wocao|Wizard Spider|Turla|Rocke|Frankenstein|The White Company|Cobalt Group|Darkhotel|MuddyWater|Tropic Trooper|FIN8|Patchwork|Naikon
|
||||
T1069.003,Cloud Groups,Discovery,no
|
||||
T1069.002,Domain Groups,Discovery,APT29|Dragonfly|Turla|Inception|OilRig|Dragonfly 2.0|Ke3chang
|
||||
T1069.002,Domain Groups,Discovery,APT29|Dragonfly|Turla|Inception|OilRig|Ke3chang
|
||||
T1087.004,Cloud Account,Discovery,APT29
|
||||
T1087.003,Email Account,Discovery,Sandworm Team|TA505
|
||||
T1087.002,Domain Account,Discovery,APT29|Lazarus Group|Dragonfly|MuddyWater|Fox Kitten|Operation Wocao|Wizard Spider|Chimera|Turla|Sandworm Team|Dragonfly 2.0|OilRig|BRONZE BUTLER|menuPass|FIN6|Poseidon Group|Ke3chang
|
||||
T1087.002,Domain Account,Discovery,APT29|Lazarus Group|Dragonfly|MuddyWater|Fox Kitten|Operation Wocao|Wizard Spider|Chimera|Turla|Sandworm Team|BRONZE BUTLER|OilRig|menuPass|FIN6|Poseidon Group|Ke3chang
|
||||
T1087.001,Local Account,Discovery,Chimera|Fox Kitten|Turla|Poseidon Group|OilRig|Ke3chang|APT32|APT1|Threat Group-3390|APT3|admin@338
|
||||
T1553.004,Install Root Certificate,Defense Evasion,no
|
||||
T1562.004,Disable or Modify System Firewall,Defense Evasion,Dragonfly|TeamTNT|APT38|APT29|Operation Wocao|Rocke|Lazarus Group|Kimsuky|Dragonfly 2.0|Carbanak
|
||||
T1562.004,Disable or Modify System Firewall,Defense Evasion,Dragonfly|TeamTNT|APT38|APT29|Operation Wocao|Rocke|Lazarus Group|Kimsuky|Carbanak
|
||||
T1562.003,Impair Command History Logging,Defense Evasion,APT38
|
||||
T1562.002,Disable Windows Event Logging,Defense Evasion,Sandworm Team|APT29|Threat Group-3390
|
||||
T1562.001,Disable or Modify Tools,Defense Evasion,Aquatic Panda|TeamTNT|Indrik Spider|APT29|MuddyWater|Wizard Spider|FIN6|Gamaredon Group|BRONZE BUTLER|Rocke|Kimsuky|Turla|Night Dragon|Gorgon Group|Lazarus Group|Putter Panda
|
||||
T1562,Impair Defenses,Defense Evasion,no
|
||||
T1003.004,LSA Secrets,Credential Access,Dragonfly|OilRig|MuddyWater|menuPass|Leafminer|Ke3chang|Dragonfly 2.0|APT33|Threat Group-3390
|
||||
T1003.004,LSA Secrets,Credential Access,Dragonfly|OilRig|MuddyWater|menuPass|Leafminer|Ke3chang|APT33|Threat Group-3390
|
||||
T1003.005,Cached Domain Credentials,Credential Access,OilRig|MuddyWater|Leafminer|APT33
|
||||
T1561.002,Disk Structure Wipe,Impact,Sandworm Team|Lazarus Group|APT38|APT37
|
||||
T1561.001,Disk Content Wipe,Impact,Lazarus Group
|
||||
T1561,Disk Wipe,Impact,no
|
||||
T1560.003,Archive via Custom Method,Collection,Mustang Panda|Lazarus Group|Kimsuky|CopyKittens|FIN6
|
||||
T1560.002,Archive via Library,Collection,Lazarus Group|Threat Group-3390
|
||||
T1560.001,Archive via Utility,Collection,Kimsuky|Aquatic Panda|APT28|APT29|Mustang Panda|HAFNIUM|Fox Kitten|Operation Wocao|Chimera|APT41|GALLIUM|Turla|Gallmaker|APT33|APT39|MuddyWater|Magic Hound|FIN8|BRONZE BUTLER|CopyKittens|Sowbug|APT3|menuPass|APT1|Ke3chang
|
||||
T1560,Archive Collected Data,Collection,Axiom|Dragonfly|Leviathan|menuPass|APT32|Honeybee|Patchwork|APT28|Dragonfly 2.0|FIN6|Lazarus Group|Ke3chang
|
||||
T1560.001,Archive via Utility,Collection,Kimsuky|Aquatic Panda|APT28|APT29|Mustang Panda|HAFNIUM|Fox Kitten|Operation Wocao|Chimera|APT41|GALLIUM|Turla|Gallmaker|APT33|APT39|MuddyWater|Magic Hound|FIN8|Sowbug|CopyKittens|APT3|BRONZE BUTLER|menuPass|APT1|Ke3chang
|
||||
T1560,Archive Collected Data,Collection,Axiom|Dragonfly|Leviathan|menuPass|APT32|APT28|Patchwork|Honeybee|FIN6|Lazarus Group|Ke3chang
|
||||
T1499.004,Application or System Exploitation,Impact,no
|
||||
T1499.003,Application Exhaustion Flood,Impact,no
|
||||
T1499.002,Service Exhaustion Flood,Impact,no
|
||||
@@ -283,7 +283,7 @@ T1499.001,OS Exhaustion Flood,Impact,no
|
||||
T1491.002,External Defacement,Impact,Sandworm Team
|
||||
T1491.001,Internal Defacement,Impact,Gamaredon Group|Lazarus Group
|
||||
T1114.003,Email Forwarding Rule,Collection,Silent Librarian|Kimsuky
|
||||
T1114.002,Remote Email Collection,Collection,Kimsuky|Dragonfly|APT29|HAFNIUM|Chimera|APT1|FIN4|Ke3chang|Leafminer|Dragonfly 2.0|APT28
|
||||
T1114.002,Remote Email Collection,Collection,Kimsuky|Dragonfly|APT29|HAFNIUM|Chimera|APT1|FIN4|Leafminer|Ke3chang|APT28
|
||||
T1114.001,Local Email Collection,Collection,Chimera|Magic Hound|APT1
|
||||
T1134.005,SID-History Injection,Defense Evasion|Privilege Escalation,no
|
||||
T1134.004,Parent PID Spoofing,Defense Evasion|Privilege Escalation,no
|
||||
@@ -295,7 +295,7 @@ T1213.001,Confluence,Collection,no
|
||||
T1555.003,Credentials from Web Browsers,Credential Access,APT29|Ajax Security Team|ZIRCONIUM|FIN6|Sandworm Team|Inception|Stealth Falcon|OilRig|Leafminer|APT33|APT3|Kimsuky|TA505|MuddyWater|APT37|Patchwork|Molerats
|
||||
T1555.002,Securityd Memory,Credential Access,no
|
||||
T1555.001,Keychain,Credential Access,no
|
||||
T1559.002,Dynamic Data Exchange,Execution,Leviathan|Sidewinder|Sharpshooter|TA505|MuddyWater|Gallmaker|Patchwork|Cobalt Group|APT37|FIN7|APT28
|
||||
T1559.002,Dynamic Data Exchange,Execution,Leviathan|Sidewinder|Sharpshooter|TA505|MuddyWater|Gallmaker|Cobalt Group|Patchwork|APT37|FIN7|APT28
|
||||
T1559.001,Component Object Model,Execution,Gamaredon Group|MuddyWater
|
||||
T1559,Inter-Process Communication,Execution,no
|
||||
T1558.002,Silver Ticket,Credential Access,no
|
||||
@@ -309,7 +309,7 @@ T1556,Modify Authentication Process,Credential Access|Defense Evasion|Persistenc
|
||||
T1056.004,Credential API Hooking,Collection|Credential Access,PLATINUM
|
||||
T1056.003,Web Portal Capture,Collection|Credential Access,no
|
||||
T1056.002,GUI Input Capture,Collection|Credential Access,FIN4
|
||||
T1056.001,Keylogging,Collection|Credential Access,Tonto Team|Ajax Security Team|Operation Wocao|APT32|Sandworm Team|APT39|APT41|Kimsuky|menuPass|FIN4|APT38|OilRig|Ke3chang|PLATINUM|Sowbug|Magic Hound|Group5|Lazarus Group|Threat Group-3390|APT3|Darkhotel|APT28
|
||||
T1056.001,Keylogging,Collection|Credential Access,Tonto Team|Ajax Security Team|Operation Wocao|APT32|Sandworm Team|APT39|APT41|Kimsuky|menuPass|FIN4|APT38|Ke3chang|OilRig|PLATINUM|Sowbug|Magic Hound|Group5|Lazarus Group|Threat Group-3390|APT3|Darkhotel|APT28
|
||||
T1555,Credentials from Password Stores,Credential Access,APT29|Evilnum|FIN6|APT39|OilRig|MuddyWater|Leafminer|APT33|Stealth Falcon
|
||||
T1552.005,Cloud Instance Metadata API,Credential Access,TeamTNT
|
||||
T1003.008,/etc/passwd and /etc/shadow,Credential Access,no
|
||||
@@ -317,19 +317,19 @@ T1003.007,Proc Filesystem,Credential Access,no
|
||||
T1003.006,DCSync,Credential Access,APT29|Operation Wocao
|
||||
T1558.003,Kerberoasting,Credential Access,FIN7|APT29|Operation Wocao|Wizard Spider
|
||||
T1552.006,Group Policy Preferences,Credential Access,APT33
|
||||
T1003.003,NTDS,Credential Access,Ke3chang|Dragonfly|APT28|Mustang Panda|HAFNIUM|Fox Kitten|menuPass|Wizard Spider|Chimera|FIN6|Dragonfly 2.0
|
||||
T1003.002,Security Account Manager,Credential Access,Dragonfly|Wizard Spider|Threat Group-3390|Ke3chang|GALLIUM|Night Dragon|Dragonfly 2.0|menuPass
|
||||
T1003.001,LSASS Memory,Credential Access,Aquatic Panda|Indrik Spider|HAFNIUM|Fox Kitten|Operation Wocao|Kimsuky|Sandworm Team|Whitefly|Blue Mockingbird|Silence|Threat Group-3390|Leviathan|APT41|GALLIUM|TEMP.Veles|APT33|APT39|APT32|Leafminer|Magic Hound|FIN8|PLATINUM|MuddyWater|OilRig|BRONZE BUTLER|FIN6|APT3|APT28|APT1|Ke3chang|Cleaver
|
||||
T1003.003,NTDS,Credential Access,Ke3chang|Dragonfly|APT28|Mustang Panda|HAFNIUM|Fox Kitten|menuPass|Wizard Spider|Chimera|FIN6
|
||||
T1003.002,Security Account Manager,Credential Access,Dragonfly|Wizard Spider|Threat Group-3390|Ke3chang|GALLIUM|Night Dragon|menuPass
|
||||
T1003.001,LSASS Memory,Credential Access,Aquatic Panda|Indrik Spider|HAFNIUM|Fox Kitten|Operation Wocao|Kimsuky|Sandworm Team|Whitefly|Blue Mockingbird|Silence|Threat Group-3390|Leviathan|APT41|GALLIUM|TEMP.Veles|APT33|APT39|APT32|Leafminer|Magic Hound|FIN8|MuddyWater|PLATINUM|OilRig|BRONZE BUTLER|FIN6|APT3|APT28|APT1|Ke3chang|Cleaver
|
||||
T1110.004,Credential Stuffing,Credential Access,Chimera
|
||||
T1110.003,Password Spraying,Credential Access,Sandworm Team|APT29|Silent Librarian|Chimera|APT28|APT33|Leafminer|Lazarus Group
|
||||
T1110.002,Password Cracking,Credential Access,Dragonfly|FIN6|APT41|Dragonfly 2.0|APT3
|
||||
T1110.002,Password Cracking,Credential Access,Dragonfly|FIN6|APT41|APT3
|
||||
T1110.001,Password Guessing,Credential Access,APT28
|
||||
T1021.006,Windows Remote Management,Lateral Movement,APT29|Chimera|Wizard Spider|Threat Group-3390
|
||||
T1021.005,VNC,Lateral Movement,Gamaredon Group|FIN7|Fox Kitten|GCMAN
|
||||
T1021.004,SSH,Lateral Movement,BlackTech|Lazarus Group|TeamTNT|FIN7|Fox Kitten|Rocke|TEMP.Veles|Leviathan|APT39|OilRig|menuPass|GCMAN
|
||||
T1021.003,Distributed Component Object Model,Lateral Movement,no
|
||||
T1021.002,SMB/Windows Admin Shares,Lateral Movement,APT29|Sandworm Team|APT28|Fox Kitten|APT41|Operation Wocao|Wizard Spider|Chimera|Blue Mockingbird|APT39|APT32|Orangeworm|FIN8|APT3|Lazarus Group|Threat Group-1314|Turla|Deep Panda|Ke3chang
|
||||
T1021.001,Remote Desktop Protocol,Lateral Movement,APT29|Dragonfly|Kimsuky|FIN7|Fox Kitten|Chimera|Blue Mockingbird|Wizard Spider|Silence|APT41|TEMP.Veles|Leviathan|APT39|Cobalt Group|Dragonfly 2.0|FIN8|APT3|OilRig|FIN10|menuPass|Patchwork|FIN6|Lazarus Group|APT1|Axiom
|
||||
T1021.001,Remote Desktop Protocol,Lateral Movement,APT29|Dragonfly|Kimsuky|FIN7|Fox Kitten|Chimera|Blue Mockingbird|Wizard Spider|Silence|APT41|TEMP.Veles|Leviathan|APT39|Cobalt Group|FIN8|OilRig|APT3|menuPass|FIN10|Patchwork|FIN6|Lazarus Group|APT1|Axiom
|
||||
T1554,Compromise Client Software Binary,Persistence,no
|
||||
T1036.006,Space after Filename,Defense Evasion,no
|
||||
T1036.005,Match Legitimate Name or Location,Defense Evasion,Ke3chang|Kimsuky|Gamaredon Group|WIRTE|APT28|Ferocious Kitten|FIN7|BackdoorDiplomacy|Transparent Tribe|Naikon|APT29|Mustang Panda|Sidewinder|Darkhotel|Lazarus Group|Indrik Spider|Fox Kitten|Machete|Chimera|PROMETHIUM|Rocke|Sandworm Team|APT39|Blue Mockingbird|Whitefly|Tropic Trooper|Silence|APT41|menuPass|TEMP.Veles|MuddyWater|Sowbug|BRONZE BUTLER|APT32|Patchwork|Poseidon Group|admin@338|Carbanak|APT1
|
||||
@@ -338,12 +338,12 @@ T1036.003,Rename System Utilities,Defense Evasion,Lazarus Group|menuPass|APT32|G
|
||||
T1036.002,Right-to-Left Override,Defense Evasion,Ferocious Kitten|BRONZE BUTLER|BlackTech|Ke3chang|Scarlet Mimic
|
||||
T1036.001,Invalid Code Signature,Defense Evasion,Windshift|APT37
|
||||
T1553.003,SIP and Trust Provider Hijacking,Defense Evasion,no
|
||||
T1553.002,Code Signing,Defense Evasion,Lazarus Group|menuPass|APT29|GALLIUM|Wizard Spider|Kimsuky|PROMETHIUM|Patchwork|Silence|APT41|FIN6|TA505|FIN7|Honeybee|Leviathan|CopyKittens|Winnti Group|Suckfly|Molerats|Darkhotel
|
||||
T1553.002,Code Signing,Defense Evasion,Lazarus Group|menuPass|APT29|GALLIUM|Wizard Spider|Kimsuky|PROMETHIUM|Patchwork|Silence|APT41|FIN6|TA505|Honeybee|FIN7|Leviathan|CopyKittens|Winnti Group|Suckfly|Molerats|Darkhotel
|
||||
T1553.001,Gatekeeper Bypass,Defense Evasion,no
|
||||
T1553,Subvert Trust Controls,Defense Evasion,Axiom
|
||||
T1027.003,Steganography,Defense Evasion,Andariel|Leviathan|TA551|BRONZE BUTLER|Tropic Trooper|MuddyWater|APT37
|
||||
T1027.002,Software Packing,Defense Evasion,Threat Group-3390|Lazarus Group|Sandworm Team|Kimsuky|TeamTNT|ZIRCONIUM|TA505|Rocke|GALLIUM|The White Company|APT39|APT38|Dark Caracal|Elderwood|APT3|Patchwork|APT29|Night Dragon
|
||||
T1027.001,Binary Padding,Defense Evasion,APT29|Mustang Panda|Higaisa|Gamaredon Group|Patchwork|APT32|Leviathan|BRONZE BUTLER|Moafee
|
||||
T1027.001,Binary Padding,Defense Evasion,APT29|Mustang Panda|Higaisa|Gamaredon Group|APT32|Patchwork|Leviathan|BRONZE BUTLER|Moafee
|
||||
T1222.002,Linux and Mac File and Directory Permissions Modification,Defense Evasion,TeamTNT|Rocke|APT32
|
||||
T1222.001,Windows File and Directory Permissions Modification,Defense Evasion,Wizard Spider
|
||||
T1552.004,Private Keys,Credential Access,TeamTNT|APT29|Operation Wocao|Rocke
|
||||
@@ -354,7 +354,7 @@ T1552,Unsecured Credentials,Credential Access,no
|
||||
T1216.001,PubPrn,Defense Evasion,APT32
|
||||
T1070.006,Timestomp,Defense Evasion,APT38|APT29|Chimera|Kimsuky|Rocke|TEMP.Veles|APT32|Lazarus Group|APT28
|
||||
T1070.005,Network Share Connection Removal,Defense Evasion,Threat Group-3390
|
||||
T1070.004,File Deletion,Defense Evasion,Aquatic Panda|Dragonfly|TeamTNT|APT39|Mustang Panda|Chimera|Evilnum|Operation Wocao|FIN6|Sandworm Team|Rocke|Tropic Trooper|Gamaredon Group|Wizard Spider|APT41|Kimsuky|Silence|The White Company|TEMP.Veles|APT32|APT38|Cobalt Group|Dragonfly 2.0|Honeybee|Patchwork|menuPass|FIN8|OilRig|FIN5|BRONZE BUTLER|APT3|Magic Hound|Threat Group-3390|APT28|FIN10|Group5|Lazarus Group|APT18|APT29
|
||||
T1070.004,File Deletion,Defense Evasion,Aquatic Panda|Dragonfly|TeamTNT|APT39|Mustang Panda|Chimera|Evilnum|Operation Wocao|FIN6|Sandworm Team|Rocke|Tropic Trooper|Gamaredon Group|Wizard Spider|APT41|Kimsuky|Silence|The White Company|TEMP.Veles|APT32|APT38|Patchwork|Honeybee|menuPass|Cobalt Group|FIN8|Magic Hound|FIN5|BRONZE BUTLER|APT3|OilRig|APT28|Threat Group-3390|FIN10|Group5|Lazarus Group|APT18|APT29
|
||||
T1070.003,Clear Command History,Defense Evasion,Lazarus Group|TeamTNT|menuPass|APT41
|
||||
T1550.004,Web Session Cookie,Defense Evasion|Lateral Movement,APT29
|
||||
T1550.001,Application Access Token,Defense Evasion|Lateral Movement,APT29|APT28
|
||||
@@ -363,17 +363,16 @@ T1550.002,Pass the Hash,Defense Evasion|Lateral Movement,Chimera|Kimsuky|GALLIUM
|
||||
T1550,Use Alternate Authentication Material,Defense Evasion|Lateral Movement,APT29
|
||||
T1548.004,Elevated Execution with Prompt,Privilege Escalation|Defense Evasion,no
|
||||
T1548.003,Sudo and Sudo Caching,Privilege Escalation|Defense Evasion,no
|
||||
T1548.002,Bypass User Account Control,Privilege Escalation|Defense Evasion,Evilnum|APT37|MuddyWater|Threat Group-3390|Honeybee|Cobalt Group|BRONZE BUTLER|Patchwork|APT29
|
||||
T1548.002,Bypass User Account Control,Privilege Escalation|Defense Evasion,Evilnum|APT37|MuddyWater|Threat Group-3390|Cobalt Group|Honeybee|BRONZE BUTLER|Patchwork|APT29
|
||||
T1548.001,Setuid and Setgid,Privilege Escalation|Defense Evasion,no
|
||||
T1548,Abuse Elevation Control Mechanism,Privilege Escalation|Defense Evasion,no
|
||||
T1136.003,Cloud Account,Persistence,APT29
|
||||
T1070.002,Clear Linux or Mac System Logs,Defense Evasion,TeamTNT|Rocke
|
||||
T1070.001,Clear Windows Event Logs,Defense Evasion,Dragonfly|Indrik Spider|Chimera|Operation Wocao|APT41|APT38|Dragonfly 2.0|APT32|FIN8|FIN5|APT28
|
||||
T1070.001,Clear Windows Event Logs,Defense Evasion,Dragonfly|Indrik Spider|Chimera|Operation Wocao|APT41|APT38|APT32|FIN8|FIN5|APT28
|
||||
T1136.002,Domain Account,Persistence,Sandworm Team|HAFNIUM|GALLIUM
|
||||
T1136.001,Local Account,Persistence,Kimsuky|Dragonfly|TeamTNT|Fox Kitten|APT39|APT41|Leafminer|Dragonfly 2.0|APT3
|
||||
T1547.011,Plist Modification,Persistence|Privilege Escalation,no
|
||||
T1136.001,Local Account,Persistence,Kimsuky|Dragonfly|TeamTNT|Fox Kitten|APT39|APT41|Leafminer|APT3
|
||||
T1547.010,Port Monitors,Persistence|Privilege Escalation,no
|
||||
T1547.009,Shortcut Modification,Persistence|Privilege Escalation,Dragonfly|APT39|Darkhotel|APT29|Gorgon Group|Dragonfly 2.0|Lazarus Group|Leviathan
|
||||
T1547.009,Shortcut Modification,Persistence|Privilege Escalation,Dragonfly|APT39|Darkhotel|APT29|Gorgon Group|Lazarus Group|Leviathan
|
||||
T1547.008,LSASS Driver,Persistence|Privilege Escalation,no
|
||||
T1547.007,Re-opened Applications,Persistence|Privilege Escalation,no
|
||||
T1547.006,Kernel Modules and Extensions,Persistence|Privilege Escalation,no
|
||||
@@ -397,27 +396,27 @@ T1546.004,Unix Shell Configuration Modification,Privilege Escalation|Persistence
|
||||
T1546.003,Windows Management Instrumentation Event Subscription,Privilege Escalation|Persistence,FIN8|Mustang Panda|APT33|Blue Mockingbird|Turla|Leviathan|APT29
|
||||
T1546.002,Screensaver,Privilege Escalation|Persistence,no
|
||||
T1546.001,Change Default File Association,Privilege Escalation|Persistence,Kimsuky
|
||||
T1547.001,Registry Run Keys / Startup Folder,Persistence|Privilege Escalation,Confucius|Dragonfly|LazyScripter|TeamTNT|Naikon|Windshift|Mustang Panda|ZIRCONIUM|Higaisa|Sidewinder|APT28|Wizard Spider|PROMETHIUM|Rocke|Tropic Trooper|Gamaredon Group|Sharpshooter|Molerats|Silence|RTM|Inception|APT41|Kimsuky|APT33|APT39|APT32|APT18|Dark Caracal|Threat Group-3390|Honeybee|Turla|Cobalt Group|Ke3chang|Dragonfly 2.0|APT19|Gorgon Group|MuddyWater|APT37|Leviathan|BRONZE BUTLER|APT3|Magic Hound|FIN10|FIN7|Patchwork|FIN6|Lazarus Group|Putter Panda|APT29|Darkhotel
|
||||
T1547.001,Registry Run Keys / Startup Folder,Persistence|Privilege Escalation,Confucius|Dragonfly|LazyScripter|TeamTNT|Naikon|Windshift|Mustang Panda|ZIRCONIUM|Higaisa|Sidewinder|APT28|Wizard Spider|PROMETHIUM|Rocke|Tropic Trooper|Gamaredon Group|Sharpshooter|Molerats|Silence|RTM|Inception|APT41|Kimsuky|APT33|APT39|APT32|APT18|Dark Caracal|Gorgon Group|Honeybee|Cobalt Group|Threat Group-3390|Turla|Ke3chang|APT19|MuddyWater|APT37|Leviathan|Magic Hound|APT3|BRONZE BUTLER|FIN7|FIN10|Patchwork|FIN6|Lazarus Group|Putter Panda|APT29|Darkhotel
|
||||
T1218.002,Control Panel,Defense Evasion,no
|
||||
T1218.010,Regsvr32,Defense Evasion,Kimsuky|Lazarus Group|TA551|Blue Mockingbird|Inception|WIRTE|Cobalt Group|APT19|Leviathan|APT32|Deep Panda
|
||||
T1218.009,Regsvcs/Regasm,Defense Evasion,no
|
||||
T1218.005,Mshta,Defense Evasion,Gamaredon Group|Confucius|Lazarus Group|APT29|LazyScripter|Mustang Panda|TA551|Sidewinder|Inception|Kimsuky|APT32|MuddyWater|FIN7
|
||||
T1218.004,InstallUtil,Defense Evasion,Mustang Panda|menuPass
|
||||
T1218.001,Compiled HTML File,Defense Evasion,APT38|APT41|Silence|Dark Caracal|OilRig|Lazarus Group
|
||||
T1218.001,Compiled HTML File,Defense Evasion,APT38|APT41|Silence|OilRig|Dark Caracal
|
||||
T1218.003,CMSTP,Defense Evasion,Cobalt Group|MuddyWater
|
||||
T1218.011,Rundll32,Defense Evasion,Kimsuky|Lazarus Group|LazyScripter|APT38|HAFNIUM|TA551|APT41|Gamaredon Group|APT32|Sandworm Team|Blue Mockingbird|TA505|MuddyWater|APT29|APT19|CopyKittens|APT3|Carbanak|APT28
|
||||
T1547,Boot or Logon Autostart Execution,Persistence|Privilege Escalation,no
|
||||
T1546,Event Triggered Execution,Privilege Escalation|Persistence,no
|
||||
T1098.003,Add Office 365 Global Administrator Role,Persistence,APT29
|
||||
T1098.002,Exchange Email Delegate Permissions,Persistence,APT28|APT29|Magic Hound
|
||||
T1098.003,Additional Cloud Roles,Persistence,APT29
|
||||
T1098.002,Additional Email Delegate Permissions,Persistence,APT28|APT29|Magic Hound
|
||||
T1098.001,Additional Cloud Credentials,Persistence,APT29
|
||||
T1543.004,Launch Daemon,Persistence|Privilege Escalation,no
|
||||
T1543.003,Windows Service,Persistence|Privilege Escalation,TeamTNT|APT38|PROMETHIUM|Blue Mockingbird|DarkVishnya|Wizard Spider|APT32|APT41|Kimsuky|Tropic Trooper|Cobalt Group|Ke3chang|FIN7|APT19|Threat Group-3390|Honeybee|APT3|Lazarus Group|Carbanak
|
||||
T1543.003,Windows Service,Persistence|Privilege Escalation,TeamTNT|APT38|PROMETHIUM|Blue Mockingbird|DarkVishnya|Wizard Spider|APT32|APT41|Kimsuky|Tropic Trooper|Threat Group-3390|Ke3chang|Cobalt Group|Honeybee|APT19|FIN7|APT3|Lazarus Group|Carbanak
|
||||
T1543.002,Systemd Service,Persistence|Privilege Escalation,TeamTNT|Rocke
|
||||
T1543.001,Launch Agent,Persistence|Privilege Escalation,no
|
||||
T1037.005,Startup Items,Persistence|Privilege Escalation,no
|
||||
T1037.004,RC Scripts,Persistence|Privilege Escalation,no
|
||||
T1055.012,Process Hollowing,Defense Evasion|Privilege Escalation,Kimsuky|Threat Group-3390|menuPass|Gorgon Group|Patchwork
|
||||
T1055.012,Process Hollowing,Defense Evasion|Privilege Escalation,Kimsuky|Threat Group-3390|Gorgon Group|menuPass|Patchwork
|
||||
T1055.013,Process Doppelgänging,Defense Evasion|Privilege Escalation,Leafminer
|
||||
T1055.011,Extra Window Memory Injection,Defense Evasion|Privilege Escalation,no
|
||||
T1055.014,VDSO Hijacking,Defense Evasion|Privilege Escalation,no
|
||||
@@ -430,18 +429,17 @@ T1055.002,Portable Executable Injection,Defense Evasion|Privilege Escalation,Roc
|
||||
T1055.001,Dynamic-link Library Injection,Defense Evasion|Privilege Escalation,BackdoorDiplomacy|Leviathan|Wizard Spider|TA505|Turla|Tropic Trooper|Lazarus Group|Putter Panda
|
||||
T1037.003,Network Logon Script,Persistence|Privilege Escalation,no
|
||||
T1543,Create or Modify System Process,Persistence|Privilege Escalation,no
|
||||
T1037.002,Logon Script (Mac),Persistence|Privilege Escalation,no
|
||||
T1037.002,Login Hook,Persistence|Privilege Escalation,no
|
||||
T1037.001,Logon Script (Windows),Persistence|Privilege Escalation,Cobalt Group|APT28
|
||||
T1542.003,Bootkit,Persistence|Defense Evasion,APT41|Lazarus Group|APT28
|
||||
T1542.002,Component Firmware,Persistence|Defense Evasion,Equation
|
||||
T1542.001,System Firmware,Persistence|Defense Evasion,no
|
||||
T1505.003,Web Shell,Persistence,Dragonfly|BackdoorDiplomacy|APT38|APT29|APT28|Tonto Team|Sandworm Team|HAFNIUM|Volatile Cedar|Fox Kitten|Operation Wocao|Kimsuky|Tropic Trooper|GALLIUM|Threat Group-3390|TEMP.Veles|Leviathan|APT39|Dragonfly 2.0|APT32|OilRig|Deep Panda
|
||||
T1505.003,Web Shell,Persistence,Dragonfly|BackdoorDiplomacy|APT38|APT29|APT28|Tonto Team|Sandworm Team|HAFNIUM|Volatile Cedar|Fox Kitten|Operation Wocao|Kimsuky|Tropic Trooper|GALLIUM|Threat Group-3390|TEMP.Veles|Leviathan|APT39|OilRig|APT32|Deep Panda
|
||||
T1505.002,Transport Agent,Persistence,no
|
||||
T1505.001,SQL Stored Procedures,Persistence,Sandworm Team
|
||||
T1053.003,Cron,Execution|Persistence|Privilege Escalation,APT38|Rocke
|
||||
T1053.001,At (Linux),Execution|Persistence|Privilege Escalation,no
|
||||
T1053.005,Scheduled Task,Execution|Persistence|Privilege Escalation,Kimsuky|Lazarus Group|Confucius|Dragonfly|APT37|APT38|Naikon|CostaRicto|Mustang Panda|Higaisa|Fox Kitten|Molerats|Machete|Operation Wocao|Chimera|Gamaredon Group|Blue Mockingbird|MuddyWater|Wizard Spider|Frankenstein|APT-C-36|BRONZE BUTLER|APT41|GALLIUM|Silence|TEMP.Veles|APT33|APT39|Rancor|OilRig|Patchwork|Dragonfly 2.0|Cobalt Group|FIN8|menuPass|FIN10|FIN7|APT32|Stealth Falcon|FIN6|APT3|APT29
|
||||
T1053.002,At (Windows),Execution|Persistence|Privilege Escalation,BRONZE BUTLER|Threat Group-3390|APT18
|
||||
T1053.005,Scheduled Task,Execution|Persistence|Privilege Escalation,Kimsuky|Lazarus Group|Confucius|Dragonfly|APT37|APT38|Naikon|CostaRicto|Mustang Panda|Higaisa|Fox Kitten|Molerats|Machete|Operation Wocao|Chimera|Gamaredon Group|Blue Mockingbird|MuddyWater|Wizard Spider|Frankenstein|APT-C-36|BRONZE BUTLER|APT41|GALLIUM|Silence|TEMP.Veles|APT33|APT39|OilRig|Rancor|Cobalt Group|Patchwork|FIN8|FIN10|menuPass|APT32|FIN7|Stealth Falcon|FIN6|APT3|APT29
|
||||
T1053.002,At,Execution|Persistence|Privilege Escalation,BRONZE BUTLER|Threat Group-3390|APT18
|
||||
T1542,Pre-OS Boot,Defense Evasion|Persistence,no
|
||||
T1137.001,Office Template Macros,Persistence,MuddyWater
|
||||
T1137.004,Outlook Home Page,Persistence,OilRig
|
||||
@@ -477,38 +475,38 @@ T1485,Data Destruction,Impact,Gamaredon Group|Sandworm Team|Lazarus Group|APT38
|
||||
T1484,Domain Policy Modification,Defense Evasion|Privilege Escalation,no
|
||||
T1482,Domain Trust Discovery,Discovery,FIN8|APT29|Chimera
|
||||
T1480,Execution Guardrails,Defense Evasion,no
|
||||
T1221,Template Injection,Defense Evasion,Lazarus Group|Confucius|Dragonfly|Gamaredon Group|Frankenstein|Inception|APT28|Tropic Trooper|DarkHydrus|Dragonfly 2.0
|
||||
T1222,File and Directory Permissions Modification,Defense Evasion,no
|
||||
T1221,Template Injection,Defense Evasion,Lazarus Group|Confucius|Dragonfly|Gamaredon Group|Frankenstein|Inception|APT28|Tropic Trooper|DarkHydrus
|
||||
T1220,XSL Script Processing,Defense Evasion,Lazarus Group|Higaisa|Cobalt Group
|
||||
T1217,Browser Bookmark Discovery,Discovery,APT38|Chimera|Fox Kitten
|
||||
T1212,Exploitation for Credential Access,Credential Access,no
|
||||
T1189,Drive-by Compromise,Initial Access,Magic Hound|APT28|Axiom|Transparent Tribe|Andariel|Leviathan|Machete|Windigo|Dragonfly|PROMETHIUM|Turla|Windshift|RTM|Darkhotel|APT38|APT19|Lazarus Group|Threat Group-3390|BRONZE BUTLER|APT32|Dark Caracal|Dragonfly 2.0|Leafminer|Patchwork|APT37|Elderwood|PLATINUM
|
||||
T1211,Exploitation for Defense Evasion,Defense Evasion,APT28
|
||||
T1197,BITS Jobs,Defense Evasion|Persistence,APT39|Patchwork|APT41|Leviathan
|
||||
T1203,Exploitation for Client Execution,Execution,Axiom|Confucius|Dragonfly|Andariel|Transparent Tribe|APT3|Tonto Team|Mustang Panda|Darkhotel|Higaisa|HAFNIUM|Sidewinder|Sandworm Team|MuddyWater|Frankenstein|Inception|BlackTech|APT41|admin@338|Threat Group-3390|APT12|The White Company|APT33|APT32|APT28|Tropic Trooper|BRONZE BUTLER|Cobalt Group|Lazarus Group|Patchwork|Elderwood|APT29|TA459|APT37|Leviathan
|
||||
T1201,Password Policy Discovery,Discovery,Chimera|Turla|OilRig
|
||||
T1195,Supply Chain Compromise,Initial Access,no
|
||||
T1199,Trusted Relationship,Initial Access,Threat Group-3390|APT29|Sandworm Team|GOLD SOUTHFIELD|APT28|menuPass
|
||||
T1218,Signed Binary Proxy Execution,Defense Evasion,Lazarus Group
|
||||
T1204,User Execution,Execution,no
|
||||
T1213,Data from Information Repositories,Collection,APT29|APT28|Fox Kitten|FIN6|Turla
|
||||
T1190,Exploit Public-Facing Application,Initial Access,Threat Group-3390|Ke3chang|Kimsuky|Magic Hound|Dragonfly|BackdoorDiplomacy|menuPass|Volatile Cedar|Fox Kitten|Operation Wocao|APT28|APT29|GOLD SOUTHFIELD|Blue Mockingbird|Rocke|APT39|BlackTech|APT41|GALLIUM|Night Dragon|Axiom
|
||||
T1210,Exploitation of Remote Services,Lateral Movement,Dragonfly|Tonto Team|FIN7|Fox Kitten|menuPass|Wizard Spider|Threat Group-3390|APT28
|
||||
T1200,Hardware Additions,Initial Access,DarkVishnya
|
||||
T1222,File and Directory Permissions Modification,Defense Evasion,no
|
||||
T1202,Indirect Command Execution,Defense Evasion,Lazarus Group
|
||||
T1195,Supply Chain Compromise,Initial Access,no
|
||||
T1219,Remote Access Software,Command And Control,TeamTNT|Mustang Panda|MuddyWater|Evilnum|GOLD SOUTHFIELD|Sandworm Team|DarkVishnya|RTM|Kimsuky|Night Dragon|Cobalt Group|Thrip|Carbanak
|
||||
T1213,Data from Information Repositories,Collection,APT29|APT28|Fox Kitten|FIN6|Turla
|
||||
T1200,Hardware Additions,Initial Access,DarkVishnya
|
||||
T1216,System Script Proxy Execution,Defense Evasion,no
|
||||
T1190,Exploit Public-Facing Application,Initial Access,Threat Group-3390|Ke3chang|Kimsuky|Magic Hound|Dragonfly|BackdoorDiplomacy|menuPass|HAFNIUM|Volatile Cedar|Fox Kitten|Operation Wocao|APT28|APT29|GOLD SOUTHFIELD|Blue Mockingbird|Rocke|APT39|BlackTech|APT41|GALLIUM|Night Dragon|Axiom
|
||||
T1201,Password Policy Discovery,Discovery,Chimera|Turla|OilRig
|
||||
T1218,System Binary Proxy Execution,Defense Evasion,Lazarus Group
|
||||
T1207,Rogue Domain Controller,Defense Evasion,no
|
||||
T1216,Signed Script Proxy Execution,Defense Evasion,no
|
||||
T1199,Trusted Relationship,Initial Access,Threat Group-3390|APT29|Sandworm Team|GOLD SOUTHFIELD|APT28|menuPass
|
||||
T1205,Traffic Signaling,Defense Evasion|Persistence|Command And Control,no
|
||||
T1217,Browser Bookmark Discovery,Discovery,APT38|Chimera|Fox Kitten
|
||||
T1204,User Execution,Execution,no
|
||||
T1210,Exploitation of Remote Services,Lateral Movement,Dragonfly|Tonto Team|FIN7|Fox Kitten|menuPass|Wizard Spider|Threat Group-3390|APT28
|
||||
T1189,Drive-by Compromise,Initial Access,Magic Hound|APT28|Axiom|Transparent Tribe|Andariel|Leviathan|Machete|Windigo|Dragonfly|PROMETHIUM|Turla|Windshift|RTM|Darkhotel|APT38|BRONZE BUTLER|Dark Caracal|Leafminer|APT32|APT19|Lazarus Group|Threat Group-3390|Patchwork|Elderwood|APT37|PLATINUM
|
||||
T1211,Exploitation for Defense Evasion,Defense Evasion,APT28
|
||||
T1212,Exploitation for Credential Access,Credential Access,no
|
||||
T1203,Exploitation for Client Execution,Execution,Axiom|Confucius|Dragonfly|Andariel|Transparent Tribe|APT3|Tonto Team|Mustang Panda|Darkhotel|Higaisa|Sidewinder|Sandworm Team|MuddyWater|Frankenstein|Inception|BlackTech|APT41|admin@338|Threat Group-3390|APT12|The White Company|APT33|APT32|APT28|Tropic Trooper|Lazarus Group|Cobalt Group|BRONZE BUTLER|Elderwood|APT37|Leviathan|Patchwork|TA459|APT29
|
||||
T1197,BITS Jobs,Defense Evasion|Persistence,APT39|Patchwork|APT41|Leviathan
|
||||
T1176,Browser Extensions,Persistence,Kimsuky
|
||||
T1187,Forced Authentication,Credential Access,Dragonfly|DarkHydrus|Dragonfly 2.0
|
||||
T1185,Browser Session Hijacking,Collection,no
|
||||
T1140,Deobfuscate/Decode Files or Information,Defense Evasion,Lazarus Group|Ke3chang|Kimsuky|APT39|APT29|ZIRCONIUM|Higaisa|Rocke|Sandworm Team|Gamaredon Group|Molerats|Frankenstein|Turla|WIRTE|Darkhotel|Tropic Trooper|Honeybee|Gorgon Group|Threat Group-3390|menuPass|APT19|Leviathan|MuddyWater|APT28|OilRig|BRONZE BUTLER
|
||||
T1187,Forced Authentication,Credential Access,Dragonfly|DarkHydrus
|
||||
T1140,Deobfuscate/Decode Files or Information,Defense Evasion,Lazarus Group|Ke3chang|Kimsuky|APT39|APT29|ZIRCONIUM|Higaisa|Rocke|Sandworm Team|Gamaredon Group|Molerats|Frankenstein|Turla|WIRTE|Darkhotel|Tropic Trooper|menuPass|Gorgon Group|Threat Group-3390|APT19|Honeybee|Leviathan|MuddyWater|APT28|OilRig|BRONZE BUTLER
|
||||
T1137,Office Application Startup,Persistence,Gamaredon Group|APT32
|
||||
T1134,Access Token Manipulation,Defense Evasion|Privilege Escalation,FIN6|Blue Mockingbird
|
||||
T1136,Create Account,Persistence,Sandworm Team|Indrik Spider
|
||||
T1135,Network Share Discovery,Discovery,Dragonfly|Tonto Team|APT38|Chimera|Operation Wocao|Wizard Spider|APT32|APT39|DarkVishnya|APT41|Tropic Trooper|APT1|Dragonfly 2.0|Sowbug
|
||||
T1137,Office Application Startup,Persistence,Gamaredon Group|APT32
|
||||
T1133,External Remote Services,Persistence|Initial Access,Dragonfly|TeamTNT|Leviathan|APT28|APT29|Operation Wocao|Wizard Spider|Kimsuky|GOLD SOUTHFIELD|Chimera|Sandworm Team|APT41|GALLIUM|TEMP.Veles|Night Dragon|Ke3chang|OilRig|Dragonfly 2.0|FIN5|Threat Group-3390|APT18
|
||||
T1135,Network Share Discovery,Discovery,Dragonfly|Tonto Team|APT38|Chimera|Operation Wocao|Wizard Spider|APT32|APT39|DarkVishnya|APT41|Tropic Trooper|APT1|Sowbug
|
||||
T1133,External Remote Services,Persistence|Initial Access,Dragonfly|TeamTNT|Leviathan|APT28|APT29|Operation Wocao|Wizard Spider|Kimsuky|GOLD SOUTHFIELD|Chimera|Sandworm Team|APT41|GALLIUM|TEMP.Veles|Night Dragon|Ke3chang|OilRig|FIN5|Threat Group-3390|APT18
|
||||
T1132,Data Encoding,Command And Control,no
|
||||
T1129,Shared Modules,Execution,no
|
||||
T1127,Trusted Developer Utilities Proxy Execution,Defense Evasion,no
|
||||
@@ -516,64 +514,64 @@ T1125,Video Capture,Collection,Silence|FIN7
|
||||
T1124,System Time Discovery,Discovery,Darkhotel|ZIRCONIUM|Higaisa|Sidewinder|Chimera|Operation Wocao|The White Company|Lazarus Group|BRONZE BUTLER|Turla
|
||||
T1123,Audio Capture,Collection,APT37
|
||||
T1120,Peripheral Device Discovery,Discovery,OilRig|BackdoorDiplomacy|Operation Wocao|Turla|APT37|Gamaredon Group|Equation|APT28
|
||||
T1119,Automated Collection,Collection,Ke3chang|Confucius|Mustang Panda|Sidewinder|Chimera|menuPass|Operation Wocao|Gamaredon Group|Tropic Trooper|Frankenstein|APT1|APT28|Patchwork|OilRig|FIN5|Threat Group-3390|FIN6
|
||||
T1119,Automated Collection,Collection,Ke3chang|Confucius|Mustang Panda|Sidewinder|Chimera|menuPass|Operation Wocao|Gamaredon Group|Tropic Trooper|Frankenstein|APT1|Patchwork|APT28|FIN5|OilRig|Threat Group-3390|FIN6
|
||||
T1115,Clipboard Data,Collection,Operation Wocao|APT39|APT38
|
||||
T1114,Email Collection,Collection,Magic Hound|Silent Librarian
|
||||
T1113,Screen Capture,Collection,Dragonfly|GOLD SOUTHFIELD|Gamaredon Group|APT39|Silence|MuddyWater|Dragonfly 2.0|OilRig|Dark Caracal|FIN7|BRONZE BUTLER|Magic Hound|Group5|APT28
|
||||
T1112,Modify Registry,Defense Evasion,Dragonfly|Operation Wocao|Kimsuky|Gamaredon Group|Blue Mockingbird|Wizard Spider|Silence|APT41|Turla|APT32|APT38|Patchwork|Gorgon Group|Threat Group-3390|Dragonfly 2.0|APT19|Honeybee|FIN8
|
||||
T1111,Two-Factor Authentication Interception,Credential Access,Kimsuky|Chimera|Operation Wocao
|
||||
T1113,Screen Capture,Collection,Dragonfly|GOLD SOUTHFIELD|Gamaredon Group|APT39|Silence|MuddyWater|FIN7|OilRig|Dark Caracal|Magic Hound|BRONZE BUTLER|Group5|APT28
|
||||
T1112,Modify Registry,Defense Evasion,Dragonfly|Operation Wocao|Kimsuky|Gamaredon Group|Blue Mockingbird|Wizard Spider|Silence|APT41|Turla|APT32|APT38|APT19|Threat Group-3390|Patchwork|Honeybee|Gorgon Group|FIN8
|
||||
T1111,Multi-Factor Authentication Interception,Credential Access,Kimsuky|Chimera|Operation Wocao
|
||||
T1110,Brute Force,Credential Access,Lazarus Group|Dragonfly|APT38|APT28|Fox Kitten|DarkVishnya|APT39|OilRig|FIN5|Turla
|
||||
T1106,Native API,Execution,BlackTech|Lazarus Group|APT38|Higaisa|menuPass|Operation Wocao|Chimera|Gamaredon Group|Tropic Trooper|Sharpshooter|Turla|Silence|APT37|Gorgon Group
|
||||
T1105,Ingress Tool Transfer,Command And Control,LazyScripter|Ke3chang|Aquatic Panda|Winnti Group|Confucius|Dragonfly|TeamTNT|Nomadic Octopus|IndigoZebra|Andariel|BackdoorDiplomacy|Tonto Team|HAFNIUM|APT29|Ajax Security Team|Mustang Panda|Windshift|Darkhotel|ZIRCONIUM|TA551|Volatile Cedar|Indrik Spider|Evilnum|Sidewinder|Fox Kitten|Kimsuky|Operation Wocao|Chimera|Sandworm Team|Whitefly|Rocke|APT39|Tropic Trooper|Sharpshooter|Molerats|Frankenstein|Silence|APT-C-36|APT41|GALLIUM|TA505|WIRTE|APT33|MuddyWater|APT18|APT38|Rancor|Gorgon Group|OilRig|Turla|Cobalt Group|Dragonfly 2.0|FIN8|PLATINUM|APT37|Elderwood|Leviathan|APT32|Magic Hound|BRONZE BUTLER|APT3|menuPass|FIN7|Gamaredon Group|Patchwork|Lazarus Group|Threat Group-3390|APT28
|
||||
T1105,Ingress Tool Transfer,Command And Control,LazyScripter|Ke3chang|Aquatic Panda|Winnti Group|Confucius|Dragonfly|TeamTNT|Nomadic Octopus|IndigoZebra|Andariel|BackdoorDiplomacy|Tonto Team|HAFNIUM|APT29|Ajax Security Team|Mustang Panda|Windshift|Darkhotel|ZIRCONIUM|TA551|Volatile Cedar|Indrik Spider|Evilnum|Sidewinder|Fox Kitten|Kimsuky|Operation Wocao|Chimera|Sandworm Team|Whitefly|Rocke|APT39|Tropic Trooper|Sharpshooter|Molerats|Frankenstein|Silence|APT-C-36|APT41|GALLIUM|TA505|WIRTE|APT33|MuddyWater|APT18|APT38|Gorgon Group|Turla|Cobalt Group|Rancor|OilRig|Leviathan|Elderwood|APT37|PLATINUM|FIN8|APT32|Magic Hound|BRONZE BUTLER|APT3|menuPass|FIN7|Gamaredon Group|Patchwork|Lazarus Group|Threat Group-3390|APT28
|
||||
T1104,Multi-Stage Channels,Command And Control,Lazarus Group|APT41|MuddyWater|APT3
|
||||
T1102,Web Service,Command And Control,Mustang Panda|LazyScripter|TeamTNT|FIN8|Fox Kitten|Turla|APT32|Gamaredon Group|Rocke|Inception|FIN6
|
||||
T1098,Account Manipulation,Persistence,Kimsuky|Dragonfly|Sandworm Team|APT3|Dragonfly 2.0|Lazarus Group
|
||||
T1098,Account Manipulation,Persistence,Kimsuky|Dragonfly|Sandworm Team|APT3|Lazarus Group
|
||||
T1095,Non-Application Layer Protocol,Command And Control,BackdoorDiplomacy|HAFNIUM|Operation Wocao|FIN6|APT29|PLATINUM|APT3
|
||||
T1092,Communication Through Removable Media,Command And Control,APT28
|
||||
T1091,Replication Through Removable Media,Lateral Movement|Initial Access,FIN7|Mustang Panda|Tropic Trooper|Darkhotel|APT28
|
||||
T1090,Proxy,Command And Control,Windigo|Fox Kitten|Operation Wocao|Sandworm Team|Blue Mockingbird|APT41|Turla
|
||||
T1087,Account Discovery,Discovery,APT29
|
||||
T1083,File and Directory Discovery,Discovery,Winnti Group|Confucius|Dragonfly|APT38|APT29|Mustang Panda|Darkhotel|Windigo|Sidewinder|Chimera|Fox Kitten|menuPass|APT39|Sandworm Team|Operation Wocao|Gamaredon Group|Tropic Trooper|Inception|APT41|Kimsuky|APT32|MuddyWater|APT18|Leafminer|Honeybee|Dark Caracal|Dragonfly 2.0|APT3|Sowbug|Magic Hound|BRONZE BUTLER|APT28|Patchwork|Lazarus Group|Dust Storm|admin@338|Turla|Ke3chang
|
||||
T1082,System Information Discovery,Discovery,Aquatic Panda|Confucius|TeamTNT|APT38|APT29|Mustang Panda|Windshift|ZIRCONIUM|Higaisa|Windigo|Sidewinder|Chimera|Operation Wocao|Wizard Spider|Rocke|Sandworm Team|Blue Mockingbird|Tropic Trooper|Frankenstein|Inception|Kimsuky|Darkhotel|MuddyWater|APT18|APT32|APT37|Honeybee|APT19|Magic Hound|Sowbug|OilRig|APT3|Gamaredon Group|Patchwork|Stealth Falcon|Lazarus Group|admin@338|Turla|Ke3chang
|
||||
T1083,File and Directory Discovery,Discovery,Winnti Group|Confucius|Dragonfly|APT38|APT29|Mustang Panda|Darkhotel|Windigo|Sidewinder|Chimera|Fox Kitten|menuPass|APT39|Sandworm Team|Operation Wocao|Gamaredon Group|Tropic Trooper|Inception|APT41|Kimsuky|APT32|MuddyWater|APT18|Dark Caracal|Leafminer|Honeybee|BRONZE BUTLER|Sowbug|Magic Hound|APT3|APT28|Patchwork|Lazarus Group|Dust Storm|admin@338|Turla|Ke3chang
|
||||
T1082,System Information Discovery,Discovery,Aquatic Panda|Confucius|TeamTNT|APT38|APT29|Mustang Panda|Windshift|ZIRCONIUM|Higaisa|Windigo|Sidewinder|Chimera|Operation Wocao|Wizard Spider|Rocke|Sandworm Team|Blue Mockingbird|Tropic Trooper|Frankenstein|Inception|Kimsuky|Darkhotel|MuddyWater|APT18|APT19|APT32|Honeybee|APT37|APT3|OilRig|Sowbug|Magic Hound|Gamaredon Group|Patchwork|Stealth Falcon|Lazarus Group|admin@338|Turla|Ke3chang
|
||||
T1080,Taint Shared Content,Lateral Movement,Gamaredon Group|BRONZE BUTLER|Darkhotel
|
||||
T1078,Valid Accounts,Defense Evasion|Persistence|Privilege Escalation|Initial Access,Ke3chang|Lazarus Group|Axiom|Dragonfly|FIN7|Leviathan|APT29|Silent Librarian|Fox Kitten|Operation Wocao|Chimera|Sandworm Team|Wizard Spider|Silence|APT41|GALLIUM|TEMP.Veles|APT39|FIN4|Night Dragon|Dragonfly 2.0|FIN8|APT33|FIN5|OilRig|APT28|menuPass|FIN10|Suckfly|FIN6|Threat Group-3390|APT18|PittyTiger|Carbanak
|
||||
T1078,Valid Accounts,Defense Evasion|Persistence|Privilege Escalation|Initial Access,Ke3chang|Lazarus Group|Axiom|Dragonfly|FIN7|Leviathan|APT29|Silent Librarian|Fox Kitten|Operation Wocao|Chimera|Sandworm Team|Wizard Spider|Silence|APT41|GALLIUM|TEMP.Veles|APT39|FIN4|Night Dragon|FIN8|APT33|OilRig|FIN5|FIN10|APT28|menuPass|Suckfly|FIN6|Threat Group-3390|APT18|PittyTiger|Carbanak
|
||||
T1074,Data Staged,Collection,Wizard Spider
|
||||
T1072,Software Deployment Tools,Execution|Lateral Movement,Silence|APT32|Threat Group-1314
|
||||
T1071,Application Layer Protocol,Command And Control,Dragonfly|TeamTNT|Rocke|Magic Hound|Dragonfly 2.0
|
||||
T1071,Application Layer Protocol,Command And Control,Dragonfly|TeamTNT|Rocke|Magic Hound
|
||||
T1070,Indicator Removal on Host,Defense Evasion,Lazarus Group|APT29
|
||||
T1069,Permission Groups Discovery,Discovery,APT29|TA505|APT3
|
||||
T1068,Exploitation for Privilege Escalation,Privilege Escalation,APT29|Tonto Team|ZIRCONIUM|Turla|Whitefly|APT33|Cobalt Group|PLATINUM|FIN8|APT32|Threat Group-3390|FIN6|APT28
|
||||
T1059,Command and Scripting Interpreter,Execution,Dragonfly|APT37|Windigo|Fox Kitten|APT32|Whitefly|APT39|Dragonfly 2.0|FIN7|APT19|OilRig|FIN5|Stealth Falcon|FIN6|Ke3chang
|
||||
T1057,Process Discovery,Discovery,Gamaredon Group|Kimsuky|TeamTNT|Andariel|APT29|Mustang Panda|Windshift|Higaisa|Sidewinder|Chimera|Operation Wocao|Rocke|Frankenstein|Inception|Darkhotel|MuddyWater|APT1|APT38|Tropic Trooper|APT37|Honeybee|OilRig|APT3|Magic Hound|APT28|Winnti Group|Stealth Falcon|Poseidon Group|Lazarus Group|Molerats|Turla|Deep Panda|Ke3chang
|
||||
T1068,Exploitation for Privilege Escalation,Privilege Escalation,APT29|Tonto Team|ZIRCONIUM|Turla|Whitefly|APT33|Cobalt Group|PLATINUM|FIN8|Threat Group-3390|APT32|FIN6|APT28
|
||||
T1059,Command and Scripting Interpreter,Execution,Dragonfly|APT37|Windigo|Fox Kitten|APT32|Whitefly|APT39|APT19|FIN7|OilRig|FIN5|Stealth Falcon|FIN6|Ke3chang
|
||||
T1057,Process Discovery,Discovery,Gamaredon Group|Kimsuky|TeamTNT|Andariel|APT29|Mustang Panda|Windshift|Higaisa|Sidewinder|Chimera|Operation Wocao|Rocke|Frankenstein|Inception|Darkhotel|MuddyWater|APT1|APT38|Tropic Trooper|APT37|Honeybee|Magic Hound|APT3|OilRig|APT28|Winnti Group|Stealth Falcon|Poseidon Group|Lazarus Group|Molerats|Turla|Deep Panda|Ke3chang
|
||||
T1056,Input Capture,Collection|Credential Access,APT39
|
||||
T1055,Process Injection,Defense Evasion|Privilege Escalation,Operation Wocao|APT32|Sharpshooter|Silence|APT41|Kimsuky|Cobalt Group|Turla|APT37|Honeybee|PLATINUM
|
||||
T1055,Process Injection,Defense Evasion|Privilege Escalation,Operation Wocao|APT32|Sharpshooter|Silence|APT41|Kimsuky|Cobalt Group|APT37|Turla|Honeybee|PLATINUM
|
||||
T1053,Scheduled Task/Job,Execution|Persistence|Privilege Escalation,no
|
||||
T1052,Exfiltration Over Physical Medium,Exfiltration,no
|
||||
T1049,System Network Connections Discovery,Discovery,Lazarus Group|TeamTNT|Andariel|BackdoorDiplomacy|Mustang Panda|MuddyWater|Chimera|Sandworm Team|Operation Wocao|Tropic Trooper|APT41|APT38|GALLIUM|APT32|APT1|OilRig|APT3|menuPass|Threat Group-3390|Poseidon Group|admin@338|Turla|Ke3chang
|
||||
T1049,System Network Connections Discovery,Discovery,Lazarus Group|TeamTNT|Andariel|BackdoorDiplomacy|Mustang Panda|MuddyWater|Chimera|Sandworm Team|Operation Wocao|Tropic Trooper|APT41|APT38|GALLIUM|APT32|APT1|OilRig|APT3|Threat Group-3390|menuPass|Poseidon Group|admin@338|Turla|Ke3chang
|
||||
T1048,Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol,Exfiltration,no
|
||||
T1047,Windows Management Instrumentation,Execution,Gamaredon Group|Sandworm Team|FIN7|Indrik Spider|Naikon|Mustang Panda|Windshift|Operation Wocao|Chimera|Blue Mockingbird|Wizard Spider|Frankenstein|APT41|FIN6|GALLIUM|APT32|MuddyWater|Threat Group-3390|OilRig|FIN8|Leviathan|menuPass|Stealth Falcon|Lazarus Group|APT29|Deep Panda
|
||||
T1046,Network Service Scanning,Discovery,BlackTech|Lazarus Group|TeamTNT|BackdoorDiplomacy|Naikon|CostaRicto|Chimera|Fox Kitten|Operation Wocao|Rocke|DarkVishnya|APT41|Tropic Trooper|APT39|APT32|OilRig|Cobalt Group|Leafminer|menuPass|Suckfly|FIN6|Threat Group-3390
|
||||
T1047,Windows Management Instrumentation,Execution,Gamaredon Group|Sandworm Team|FIN7|Indrik Spider|Naikon|Mustang Panda|Windshift|Operation Wocao|Chimera|Blue Mockingbird|Wizard Spider|Frankenstein|APT41|FIN6|GALLIUM|APT32|MuddyWater|OilRig|Threat Group-3390|Leviathan|FIN8|menuPass|Stealth Falcon|Lazarus Group|APT29|Deep Panda
|
||||
T1046,Network Service Discovery,Discovery,BlackTech|Lazarus Group|TeamTNT|BackdoorDiplomacy|Naikon|CostaRicto|Chimera|Fox Kitten|Operation Wocao|Rocke|DarkVishnya|APT41|Tropic Trooper|APT39|APT32|Leafminer|Cobalt Group|OilRig|menuPass|Suckfly|FIN6|Threat Group-3390
|
||||
T1041,Exfiltration Over C2 Channel,Exfiltration,Confucius|Leviathan|ZIRCONIUM|Higaisa|Chimera|APT39|Operation Wocao|Sandworm Team|MuddyWater|Wizard Spider|Frankenstein|Kimsuky|GALLIUM|APT32|APT3|Gamaredon Group|Stealth Falcon|Lazarus Group|Ke3chang
|
||||
T1040,Network Sniffing,Credential Access|Discovery,Kimsuky|Sandworm Team|DarkVishnya|APT33|APT28
|
||||
T1039,Data from Network Shared Drive,Collection,APT28|Chimera|Fox Kitten|Gamaredon Group|BRONZE BUTLER|Sowbug|menuPass
|
||||
T1037,Boot or Logon Initialization Scripts,Persistence|Privilege Escalation,Rocke
|
||||
T1036,Masquerading,Defense Evasion,Kimsuky|Lazarus Group|Dragonfly|LazyScripter|APT28|Nomadic Octopus|OilRig|APT29|ZIRCONIUM|TA551|Windshift|APT32|BRONZE BUTLER|menuPass|PLATINUM|Dragonfly 2.0
|
||||
T1033,System Owner/User Discovery,Discovery,Threat Group-3390|Ke3chang|Dragonfly|APT38|Windshift|ZIRCONIUM|Sidewinder|Chimera|Sandworm Team|Operation Wocao|Wizard Spider|Frankenstein|APT41|GALLIUM|Tropic Trooper|APT39|MuddyWater|APT37|Dragonfly 2.0|APT19|APT32|Magic Hound|OilRig|FIN10|Gamaredon Group|Patchwork|Stealth Falcon|Lazarus Group|APT3
|
||||
T1036,Masquerading,Defense Evasion,Kimsuky|Lazarus Group|Dragonfly|LazyScripter|APT28|Nomadic Octopus|OilRig|APT29|ZIRCONIUM|TA551|Windshift|APT32|BRONZE BUTLER|menuPass|PLATINUM
|
||||
T1033,System Owner/User Discovery,Discovery,Threat Group-3390|Ke3chang|Dragonfly|APT38|Windshift|ZIRCONIUM|Sidewinder|Chimera|Sandworm Team|Operation Wocao|Wizard Spider|Frankenstein|APT41|GALLIUM|Tropic Trooper|APT39|MuddyWater|APT32|APT37|APT19|OilRig|Magic Hound|FIN10|Gamaredon Group|Patchwork|Stealth Falcon|Lazarus Group|APT3
|
||||
T1030,Data Transfer Size Limits,Exfiltration,APT28|Threat Group-3390
|
||||
T1029,Scheduled Transfer,Exfiltration,Higaisa
|
||||
T1027,Obfuscated Files or Information,Defense Evasion,Aquatic Panda|Ke3chang|LazyScripter|TeamTNT|BackdoorDiplomacy|Transparent Tribe|APT39|Mustang Panda|Windshift|TA551|Higaisa|Sidewinder|Fox Kitten|GOLD SOUTHFIELD|Operation Wocao|Kimsuky|FIN6|Chimera|Gamaredon Group|Rocke|Sandworm Team|Blue Mockingbird|Whitefly|Molerats|Wizard Spider|Mofang|Frankenstein|Inception|APT-C-36|APT41|GALLIUM|Turla|TA505|Silence|APT33|Night Dragon|Darkhotel|Gallmaker|APT29|APT18|Tropic Trooper|Patchwork|menuPass|APT37|Threat Group-3390|Cobalt Group|Dark Caracal|Leafminer|Honeybee|APT19|BlackOasis|Leviathan|FIN8|MuddyWater|FIN7|Elderwood|OilRig|Magic Hound|APT3|APT32|Group5|Dust Storm|Lazarus Group|Putter Panda|APT28
|
||||
T1027,Obfuscated Files or Information,Defense Evasion,Aquatic Panda|Ke3chang|LazyScripter|TeamTNT|BackdoorDiplomacy|Transparent Tribe|APT39|Mustang Panda|Windshift|TA551|Higaisa|Sidewinder|Fox Kitten|GOLD SOUTHFIELD|Operation Wocao|Kimsuky|FIN6|Chimera|Gamaredon Group|Rocke|Sandworm Team|Blue Mockingbird|Whitefly|Molerats|Wizard Spider|Mofang|Frankenstein|Inception|APT-C-36|APT41|GALLIUM|Turla|TA505|Silence|APT33|Night Dragon|Darkhotel|Gallmaker|APT29|APT18|Tropic Trooper|APT37|Cobalt Group|Dark Caracal|menuPass|Leafminer|Honeybee|APT19|Threat Group-3390|Patchwork|Elderwood|MuddyWater|Leviathan|FIN7|BlackOasis|FIN8|OilRig|APT3|Magic Hound|APT32|Group5|Dust Storm|Lazarus Group|Putter Panda|APT28
|
||||
T1025,Data from Removable Media,Collection,Turla|Gamaredon Group|APT28
|
||||
T1021,Remote Services,Lateral Movement,no
|
||||
T1020,Automated Exfiltration,Exfiltration,Ke3chang|Sidewinder|Gamaredon Group|Tropic Trooper|Frankenstein|Honeybee
|
||||
T1018,Remote System Discovery,Discovery,Dragonfly|Indrik Spider|Naikon|APT29|Chimera|Fox Kitten|Operation Wocao|Sandworm Team|Rocke|Wizard Spider|Silence|GALLIUM|APT39|APT32|Deep Panda|Ke3chang|Threat Group-3390|Dragonfly 2.0|Leafminer|FIN8|FIN5|APT3|BRONZE BUTLER|menuPass|FIN6|Turla
|
||||
T1016,System Network Configuration Discovery,Discovery,Kimsuky|Dragonfly|TeamTNT|ZIRCONIUM|Mustang Panda|Higaisa|Sidewinder|Chimera|Operation Wocao|Wizard Spider|Sandworm Team|Tropic Trooper|Frankenstein|APT41|GALLIUM|APT32|Darkhotel|MuddyWater|APT1|APT19|Dragonfly 2.0|Magic Hound|OilRig|Threat Group-3390|menuPass|Stealth Falcon|Lazarus Group|APT3|Naikon|admin@338|Turla|Ke3chang
|
||||
T1018,Remote System Discovery,Discovery,Dragonfly|Indrik Spider|Naikon|APT29|Chimera|Fox Kitten|Operation Wocao|Sandworm Team|Rocke|Wizard Spider|Silence|GALLIUM|APT39|APT32|Leafminer|Ke3chang|Threat Group-3390|Deep Panda|FIN8|BRONZE BUTLER|FIN5|APT3|menuPass|FIN6|Turla
|
||||
T1016,System Network Configuration Discovery,Discovery,Kimsuky|Dragonfly|TeamTNT|ZIRCONIUM|Mustang Panda|Higaisa|Sidewinder|Chimera|Operation Wocao|Wizard Spider|Sandworm Team|Tropic Trooper|Frankenstein|APT41|GALLIUM|APT32|Darkhotel|MuddyWater|APT1|APT19|Magic Hound|OilRig|Threat Group-3390|menuPass|Stealth Falcon|Lazarus Group|APT3|Naikon|admin@338|Turla|Ke3chang
|
||||
T1014,Rootkit,Defense Evasion,TeamTNT|Rocke|APT41|APT28|Winnti Group
|
||||
T1012,Query Registry,Discovery,Kimsuky|Dragonfly|ZIRCONIUM|Chimera|Fox Kitten|APT39|Operation Wocao|APT32|Dragonfly 2.0|Threat Group-3390|OilRig|Stealth Falcon|Lazarus Group|Turla
|
||||
T1012,Query Registry,Discovery,Kimsuky|Dragonfly|ZIRCONIUM|Chimera|Fox Kitten|APT39|Operation Wocao|APT32|Threat Group-3390|OilRig|Stealth Falcon|Lazarus Group|Turla
|
||||
T1011,Exfiltration Over Other Network Medium,Exfiltration,no
|
||||
T1010,Application Window Discovery,Discovery,Lazarus Group
|
||||
T1008,Fallback Channels,Command And Control,FIN7|APT41|OilRig|Lazarus Group
|
||||
T1007,System Service Discovery,Discovery,Kimsuky|Aquatic Panda|Indrik Spider|Chimera|Operation Wocao|BRONZE BUTLER|APT1|OilRig|Poseidon Group|admin@338|Turla|Ke3chang
|
||||
T1006,Direct Volume Access,Defense Evasion,no
|
||||
T1005,Data from Local System,Collection,Axiom|Dragonfly|FIN7|APT41|APT38|Andariel|APT29|Windigo|Fox Kitten|Sandworm Team|Operation Wocao|FIN6|Gamaredon Group|APT39|Frankenstein|Inception|Kimsuky|GALLIUM|Turla|menuPass|Dark Caracal|Dragonfly 2.0|Honeybee|APT37|APT28|APT3|BRONZE BUTLER|Patchwork|Stealth Falcon|Lazarus Group|Dust Storm|Threat Group-3390|APT1|Ke3chang
|
||||
T1005,Data from Local System,Collection,Axiom|Dragonfly|FIN7|APT41|APT38|Andariel|APT29|Windigo|Fox Kitten|Sandworm Team|Operation Wocao|FIN6|Gamaredon Group|APT39|Frankenstein|Inception|Kimsuky|GALLIUM|Turla|menuPass|Honeybee|Dark Caracal|APT37|APT28|BRONZE BUTLER|APT3|Patchwork|Stealth Falcon|Lazarus Group|Dust Storm|Threat Group-3390|APT1|Ke3chang
|
||||
T1003,OS Credential Dumping,Credential Access,Tonto Team|APT39|Frankenstein|APT32|APT28|Leviathan|Sowbug|Suckfly|Poseidon Group|Axiom
|
||||
T1001,Data Obfuscation,Command And Control,Operation Wocao|Axiom
|
||||
T1001,Data Obfuscation,Command And Control,Operation Wocao
|
||||
|
||||
|
@@ -60,6 +60,8 @@ detections:
|
||||
url: /detections/network_traffic/
|
||||
- title: Risk
|
||||
url: /detections/risk/
|
||||
- title: Splunk_Audit
|
||||
url: /detections/splunk_audit/
|
||||
- title: UEBA
|
||||
url: /detections/ueba/
|
||||
- title: Updates
|
||||
|
||||
+79
-64
@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ sidebar:
|
||||
| [CHCP Command Execution](/endpoint/chcp_command_execution/) | [Command and Scripting Interpreter](/tags/#command-and-scripting-interpreter) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [CMD Carry Out String Command Parameter](/endpoint/cmd_carry_out_string_command_parameter/) | [Windows Command Shell](/tags/#windows-command-shell), [Command and Scripting Interpreter](/tags/#command-and-scripting-interpreter) | [Hunting](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [CMD Echo Pipe - Escalation](/endpoint/cmd_echo_pipe_-_escalation/) | [Command and Scripting Interpreter](/tags/#command-and-scripting-interpreter), [Windows Command Shell](/tags/#windows-command-shell), [Windows Service](/tags/#windows-service), [Create or Modify System Process](/tags/#create-or-modify-system-process) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [CMLUA Or CMSTPLUA UAC Bypass](/endpoint/cmlua_or_cmstplua_uac_bypass/) | [Signed Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#signed-binary-proxy-execution), [CMSTP](/tags/#cmstp) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [CMLUA Or CMSTPLUA UAC Bypass](/endpoint/cmlua_or_cmstplua_uac_bypass/) | [System Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#system-binary-proxy-execution), [CMSTP](/tags/#cmstp) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [CSC Net On The Fly Compilation](/endpoint/csc_net_on_the_fly_compilation/) | [Compile After Delivery](/tags/#compile-after-delivery), [Obfuscated Files or Information](/tags/#obfuscated-files-or-information) | [Hunting](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [CertUtil Download With URLCache and Split Arguments](/endpoint/certutil_download_with_urlcache_and_split_arguments/) | [Ingress Tool Transfer](/tags/#ingress-tool-transfer) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [CertUtil Download With VerifyCtl and Split Arguments](/endpoint/certutil_download_with_verifyctl_and_split_arguments/) | [Ingress Tool Transfer](/tags/#ingress-tool-transfer) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ sidebar:
|
||||
| [Circle CI Disable Security Job](/cloud/circle_ci_disable_security_job/) | [Compromise Client Software Binary](/tags/#compromise-client-software-binary) | [Anomaly](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Circle CI Disable Security Step](/cloud/circle_ci_disable_security_step/) | [Compromise Client Software Binary](/tags/#compromise-client-software-binary) | [Anomaly](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Clear Unallocated Sector Using Cipher App](/endpoint/clear_unallocated_sector_using_cipher_app/) | [File Deletion](/tags/#file-deletion), [Indicator Removal on Host](/tags/#indicator-removal-on-host) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Clients Connecting to Multiple DNS Servers](/deprecated/clients_connecting_to_multiple_dns_servers/) | [Exfiltration Over Unencrypted/Obfuscated Non-C2 Protocol](/tags/#exfiltration-over-unencrypted/obfuscated-non-c2-protocol) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Clients Connecting to Multiple DNS Servers](/deprecated/clients_connecting_to_multiple_dns_servers/) | [Exfiltration Over Unencrypted Non-C2 Protocol](/tags/#exfiltration-over-unencrypted-non-c2-protocol) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Clop Common Exec Parameter](/endpoint/clop_common_exec_parameter/) | [User Execution](/tags/#user-execution) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Clop Ransomware Known Service Name](/endpoint/clop_ransomware_known_service_name/) | [Create or Modify System Process](/tags/#create-or-modify-system-process) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Cloud API Calls From Previously Unseen User Roles](/cloud/cloud_api_calls_from_previously_unseen_user_roles/) | [Valid Accounts](/tags/#valid-accounts) | [Anomaly](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
@@ -108,8 +108,9 @@ sidebar:
|
||||
| [Cobalt Strike Named Pipes](/endpoint/cobalt_strike_named_pipes/) | [Process Injection](/tags/#process-injection) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Common Ransomware Extensions](/endpoint/common_ransomware_extensions/) | [Data Destruction](/tags/#data-destruction) | [Hunting](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Common Ransomware Notes](/endpoint/common_ransomware_notes/) | [Data Destruction](/tags/#data-destruction) | [Hunting](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Confluence Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution CVE-2022-26134](/web/confluence_unauthenticated_remote_code_execution_cve-2022-26134/) | [Server Software Component](/tags/#server-software-component), [Exploit Public-Facing Application](/tags/#exploit-public-facing-application) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Conti Common Exec parameter](/endpoint/conti_common_exec_parameter/) | [User Execution](/tags/#user-execution) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Control Loading from World Writable Directory](/endpoint/control_loading_from_world_writable_directory/) | [Signed Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#signed-binary-proxy-execution), [Control Panel](/tags/#control-panel) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Control Loading from World Writable Directory](/endpoint/control_loading_from_world_writable_directory/) | [System Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#system-binary-proxy-execution), [Control Panel](/tags/#control-panel) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Correlation by Repository and Risk](/cloud/correlation_by_repository_and_risk/) | [Malicious Image](/tags/#malicious-image), [User Execution](/tags/#user-execution) | [Correlation](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Correlation by User and Risk](/cloud/correlation_by_user_and_risk/) | [Malicious Image](/tags/#malicious-image), [User Execution](/tags/#user-execution) | [Correlation](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Create Remote Thread In Shell Application](/endpoint/create_remote_thread_in_shell_application/) | [Process Injection](/tags/#process-injection) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
@@ -125,7 +126,7 @@ sidebar:
|
||||
| [DLLHost with no Command Line Arguments with Network](/endpoint/dllhost_with_no_command_line_arguments_with_network/) | [Process Injection](/tags/#process-injection) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [DNS Exfiltration Using Nslookup App](/endpoint/dns_exfiltration_using_nslookup_app/) | [Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol](/tags/#exfiltration-over-alternative-protocol) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [DNS Query Length Outliers - MLTK](/network/dns_query_length_outliers_-_mltk/) | [DNS](/tags/#dns), [Application Layer Protocol](/tags/#application-layer-protocol) | [Anomaly](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [DNS Query Length With High Standard Deviation](/network/dns_query_length_with_high_standard_deviation/) | [Exfiltration Over Unencrypted/Obfuscated Non-C2 Protocol](/tags/#exfiltration-over-unencrypted/obfuscated-non-c2-protocol), [Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol](/tags/#exfiltration-over-alternative-protocol) | [Anomaly](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [DNS Query Length With High Standard Deviation](/network/dns_query_length_with_high_standard_deviation/) | [Exfiltration Over Unencrypted Non-C2 Protocol](/tags/#exfiltration-over-unencrypted-non-c2-protocol), [Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol](/tags/#exfiltration-over-alternative-protocol) | [Anomaly](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [DNS Query Requests Resolved by Unauthorized DNS Servers](/deprecated/dns_query_requests_resolved_by_unauthorized_dns_servers/) | [DNS](/tags/#dns) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [DNS record changed](/deprecated/dns_record_changed/) | [DNS](/tags/#dns) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [DSQuery Domain Discovery](/endpoint/dsquery_domain_discovery/) | [Domain Trust Discovery](/tags/#domain-trust-discovery) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
@@ -155,14 +156,14 @@ sidebar:
|
||||
| [Detect Exchange Web Shell](/endpoint/detect_exchange_web_shell/) | [Server Software Component](/tags/#server-software-component), [Web Shell](/tags/#web-shell), [Exploit Public-Facing Application](/tags/#exploit-public-facing-application) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Detect F5 TMUI RCE CVE-2020-5902](/web/detect_f5_tmui_rce_cve-2020-5902/) | [Exploit Public-Facing Application](/tags/#exploit-public-facing-application) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Detect GCP Storage access from a new IP](/cloud/detect_gcp_storage_access_from_a_new_ip/) | [Data from Cloud Storage Object](/tags/#data-from-cloud-storage-object) | [Anomaly](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Detect HTML Help Renamed](/endpoint/detect_html_help_renamed/) | [Signed Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#signed-binary-proxy-execution), [Compiled HTML File](/tags/#compiled-html-file) | [Hunting](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Detect HTML Help Spawn Child Process](/endpoint/detect_html_help_spawn_child_process/) | [Signed Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#signed-binary-proxy-execution), [Compiled HTML File](/tags/#compiled-html-file) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Detect HTML Help URL in Command Line](/endpoint/detect_html_help_url_in_command_line/) | [Signed Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#signed-binary-proxy-execution), [Compiled HTML File](/tags/#compiled-html-file) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Detect HTML Help Using InfoTech Storage Handlers](/endpoint/detect_html_help_using_infotech_storage_handlers/) | [Signed Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#signed-binary-proxy-execution), [Compiled HTML File](/tags/#compiled-html-file) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Detect HTML Help Renamed](/endpoint/detect_html_help_renamed/) | [System Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#system-binary-proxy-execution), [Compiled HTML File](/tags/#compiled-html-file) | [Hunting](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Detect HTML Help Spawn Child Process](/endpoint/detect_html_help_spawn_child_process/) | [System Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#system-binary-proxy-execution), [Compiled HTML File](/tags/#compiled-html-file) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Detect HTML Help URL in Command Line](/endpoint/detect_html_help_url_in_command_line/) | [System Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#system-binary-proxy-execution), [Compiled HTML File](/tags/#compiled-html-file) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Detect HTML Help Using InfoTech Storage Handlers](/endpoint/detect_html_help_using_infotech_storage_handlers/) | [System Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#system-binary-proxy-execution), [Compiled HTML File](/tags/#compiled-html-file) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Detect IPv6 Network Infrastructure Threats](/network/detect_ipv6_network_infrastructure_threats/) | [Hardware Additions](/tags/#hardware-additions), [Network Denial of Service](/tags/#network-denial-of-service), [Adversary-in-the-Middle](/tags/#adversary-in-the-middle), [ARP Cache Poisoning](/tags/#arp-cache-poisoning) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Detect Large Outbound ICMP Packets](/network/detect_large_outbound_icmp_packets/) | [Non-Application Layer Protocol](/tags/#non-application-layer-protocol) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Detect Long DNS TXT Record Response](/deprecated/detect_long_dns_txt_record_response/) | [Exfiltration Over Unencrypted/Obfuscated Non-C2 Protocol](/tags/#exfiltration-over-unencrypted/obfuscated-non-c2-protocol) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Detect MSHTA Url in Command Line](/endpoint/detect_mshta_url_in_command_line/) | [Signed Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#signed-binary-proxy-execution), [Mshta](/tags/#mshta) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Detect Long DNS TXT Record Response](/deprecated/detect_long_dns_txt_record_response/) | [Exfiltration Over Unencrypted Non-C2 Protocol](/tags/#exfiltration-over-unencrypted-non-c2-protocol) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Detect MSHTA Url in Command Line](/endpoint/detect_mshta_url_in_command_line/) | [System Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#system-binary-proxy-execution), [Mshta](/tags/#mshta) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Detect Mimikatz Using Loaded Images](/endpoint/detect_mimikatz_using_loaded_images/) | [LSASS Memory](/tags/#lsass-memory), [OS Credential Dumping](/tags/#os-credential-dumping) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Detect Mimikatz Via PowerShell And EventCode 4703](/deprecated/detect_mimikatz_via_powershell_and_eventcode_4703/) | [LSASS Memory](/tags/#lsass-memory) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Detect Mimikatz With PowerShell Script Block Logging](/endpoint/detect_mimikatz_with_powershell_script_block_logging/) | [OS Credential Dumping](/tags/#os-credential-dumping) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
@@ -180,22 +181,22 @@ sidebar:
|
||||
| [Detect PsExec With accepteula Flag](/endpoint/detect_psexec_with_accepteula_flag/) | [Remote Services](/tags/#remote-services), [SMB/Windows Admin Shares](/tags/#smb/windows-admin-shares) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Detect RClone Command-Line Usage](/endpoint/detect_rclone_command-line_usage/) | [Automated Exfiltration](/tags/#automated-exfiltration) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Detect Rare Executables](/endpoint/detect_rare_executables/) | None | [Anomaly](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Detect Regasm Spawning a Process](/endpoint/detect_regasm_spawning_a_process/) | [Signed Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#signed-binary-proxy-execution), [Regsvcs/Regasm](/tags/#regsvcs/regasm) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Detect Regasm with Network Connection](/endpoint/detect_regasm_with_network_connection/) | [Signed Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#signed-binary-proxy-execution), [Regsvcs/Regasm](/tags/#regsvcs/regasm) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Detect Regasm with no Command Line Arguments](/endpoint/detect_regasm_with_no_command_line_arguments/) | [Signed Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#signed-binary-proxy-execution), [Regsvcs/Regasm](/tags/#regsvcs/regasm) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Detect Regsvcs Spawning a Process](/endpoint/detect_regsvcs_spawning_a_process/) | [Signed Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#signed-binary-proxy-execution), [Regsvcs/Regasm](/tags/#regsvcs/regasm) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Detect Regsvcs with Network Connection](/endpoint/detect_regsvcs_with_network_connection/) | [Signed Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#signed-binary-proxy-execution), [Regsvcs/Regasm](/tags/#regsvcs/regasm) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Detect Regsvcs with No Command Line Arguments](/endpoint/detect_regsvcs_with_no_command_line_arguments/) | [Signed Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#signed-binary-proxy-execution), [Regsvcs/Regasm](/tags/#regsvcs/regasm) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Detect Regsvr32 Application Control Bypass](/endpoint/detect_regsvr32_application_control_bypass/) | [Signed Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#signed-binary-proxy-execution), [Regsvr32](/tags/#regsvr32) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Detect Regasm Spawning a Process](/endpoint/detect_regasm_spawning_a_process/) | [System Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#system-binary-proxy-execution), [Regsvcs/Regasm](/tags/#regsvcs/regasm) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Detect Regasm with Network Connection](/endpoint/detect_regasm_with_network_connection/) | [System Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#system-binary-proxy-execution), [Regsvcs/Regasm](/tags/#regsvcs/regasm) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Detect Regasm with no Command Line Arguments](/endpoint/detect_regasm_with_no_command_line_arguments/) | [System Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#system-binary-proxy-execution), [Regsvcs/Regasm](/tags/#regsvcs/regasm) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Detect Regsvcs Spawning a Process](/endpoint/detect_regsvcs_spawning_a_process/) | [System Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#system-binary-proxy-execution), [Regsvcs/Regasm](/tags/#regsvcs/regasm) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Detect Regsvcs with Network Connection](/endpoint/detect_regsvcs_with_network_connection/) | [System Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#system-binary-proxy-execution), [Regsvcs/Regasm](/tags/#regsvcs/regasm) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Detect Regsvcs with No Command Line Arguments](/endpoint/detect_regsvcs_with_no_command_line_arguments/) | [System Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#system-binary-proxy-execution), [Regsvcs/Regasm](/tags/#regsvcs/regasm) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Detect Regsvr32 Application Control Bypass](/endpoint/detect_regsvr32_application_control_bypass/) | [System Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#system-binary-proxy-execution), [Regsvr32](/tags/#regsvr32) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Detect Renamed 7-Zip](/endpoint/detect_renamed_7-zip/) | [Archive via Utility](/tags/#archive-via-utility), [Archive Collected Data](/tags/#archive-collected-data) | [Hunting](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Detect Renamed PSExec](/endpoint/detect_renamed_psexec/) | [System Services](/tags/#system-services), [Service Execution](/tags/#service-execution) | [Hunting](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Detect Renamed RClone](/endpoint/detect_renamed_rclone/) | [Automated Exfiltration](/tags/#automated-exfiltration) | [Hunting](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Detect Renamed WinRAR](/endpoint/detect_renamed_winrar/) | [Archive via Utility](/tags/#archive-via-utility), [Archive Collected Data](/tags/#archive-collected-data) | [Hunting](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Detect Rogue DHCP Server](/network/detect_rogue_dhcp_server/) | [Hardware Additions](/tags/#hardware-additions), [Network Denial of Service](/tags/#network-denial-of-service), [Adversary-in-the-Middle](/tags/#adversary-in-the-middle) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Detect Rundll32 Application Control Bypass - advpack](/endpoint/detect_rundll32_application_control_bypass_-_advpack/) | [Signed Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#signed-binary-proxy-execution), [Rundll32](/tags/#rundll32) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Detect Rundll32 Application Control Bypass - setupapi](/endpoint/detect_rundll32_application_control_bypass_-_setupapi/) | [Signed Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#signed-binary-proxy-execution), [Rundll32](/tags/#rundll32) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Detect Rundll32 Application Control Bypass - syssetup](/endpoint/detect_rundll32_application_control_bypass_-_syssetup/) | [Signed Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#signed-binary-proxy-execution), [Rundll32](/tags/#rundll32) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Detect Rundll32 Inline HTA Execution](/endpoint/detect_rundll32_inline_hta_execution/) | [Signed Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#signed-binary-proxy-execution), [Mshta](/tags/#mshta) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Detect Rundll32 Application Control Bypass - advpack](/endpoint/detect_rundll32_application_control_bypass_-_advpack/) | [System Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#system-binary-proxy-execution), [Rundll32](/tags/#rundll32) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Detect Rundll32 Application Control Bypass - setupapi](/endpoint/detect_rundll32_application_control_bypass_-_setupapi/) | [System Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#system-binary-proxy-execution), [Rundll32](/tags/#rundll32) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Detect Rundll32 Application Control Bypass - syssetup](/endpoint/detect_rundll32_application_control_bypass_-_syssetup/) | [System Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#system-binary-proxy-execution), [Rundll32](/tags/#rundll32) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Detect Rundll32 Inline HTA Execution](/endpoint/detect_rundll32_inline_hta_execution/) | [System Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#system-binary-proxy-execution), [Mshta](/tags/#mshta) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Detect S3 access from a new IP](/cloud/detect_s3_access_from_a_new_ip/) | [Data from Cloud Storage Object](/tags/#data-from-cloud-storage-object) | [Anomaly](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Detect SNICat SNI Exfiltration](/network/detect_snicat_sni_exfiltration/) | [Exfiltration Over C2 Channel](/tags/#exfiltration-over-c2-channel) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Detect SharpHound Command-Line Arguments](/endpoint/detect_sharphound_command-line_arguments/) | [Domain Account](/tags/#domain-account), [Local Groups](/tags/#local-groups), [Domain Trust Discovery](/tags/#domain-trust-discovery), [Local Account](/tags/#local-account), [Account Discovery](/tags/#account-discovery), [Domain Groups](/tags/#domain-groups), [Permission Groups Discovery](/tags/#permission-groups-discovery) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
@@ -220,14 +221,14 @@ sidebar:
|
||||
| [Detect attackers scanning for vulnerable JBoss servers](/web/detect_attackers_scanning_for_vulnerable_jboss_servers/) | [System Information Discovery](/tags/#system-information-discovery) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Detect hosts connecting to dynamic domain providers](/network/detect_hosts_connecting_to_dynamic_domain_providers/) | [Drive-by Compromise](/tags/#drive-by-compromise) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Detect malicious requests to exploit JBoss servers](/web/detect_malicious_requests_to_exploit_jboss_servers/) | None | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Detect mshta inline hta execution](/endpoint/detect_mshta_inline_hta_execution/) | [Signed Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#signed-binary-proxy-execution), [Mshta](/tags/#mshta) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Detect mshta renamed](/endpoint/detect_mshta_renamed/) | [Signed Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#signed-binary-proxy-execution), [Mshta](/tags/#mshta) | [Hunting](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Detect mshta inline hta execution](/endpoint/detect_mshta_inline_hta_execution/) | [System Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#system-binary-proxy-execution), [Mshta](/tags/#mshta) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Detect mshta renamed](/endpoint/detect_mshta_renamed/) | [System Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#system-binary-proxy-execution), [Mshta](/tags/#mshta) | [Hunting](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Detect new API calls from user roles](/deprecated/detect_new_api_calls_from_user_roles/) | [Cloud Accounts](/tags/#cloud-accounts) | [Anomaly](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Detect new user AWS Console Login](/deprecated/detect_new_user_aws_console_login/) | [Cloud Accounts](/tags/#cloud-accounts) | [Hunting](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Detect processes used for System Network Configuration Discovery](/endpoint/detect_processes_used_for_system_network_configuration_discovery/) | [System Network Configuration Discovery](/tags/#system-network-configuration-discovery) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Detect shared ec2 snapshot](/cloud/detect_shared_ec2_snapshot/) | [Transfer Data to Cloud Account](/tags/#transfer-data-to-cloud-account) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Detect web traffic to dynamic domain providers](/deprecated/detect_web_traffic_to_dynamic_domain_providers/) | [Web Protocols](/tags/#web-protocols) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Detection of DNS Tunnels](/deprecated/detection_of_dns_tunnels/) | [Exfiltration Over Unencrypted/Obfuscated Non-C2 Protocol](/tags/#exfiltration-over-unencrypted/obfuscated-non-c2-protocol) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Detection of DNS Tunnels](/deprecated/detection_of_dns_tunnels/) | [Exfiltration Over Unencrypted Non-C2 Protocol](/tags/#exfiltration-over-unencrypted-non-c2-protocol) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Detection of tools built by NirSoft](/endpoint/detection_of_tools_built_by_nirsoft/) | [Software Deployment Tools](/tags/#software-deployment-tools) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Disable AMSI Through Registry](/endpoint/disable_amsi_through_registry/) | [Disable or Modify Tools](/tags/#disable-or-modify-tools), [Impair Defenses](/tags/#impair-defenses) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Disable Defender AntiVirus Registry](/endpoint/disable_defender_antivirus_registry/) | [Disable or Modify Tools](/tags/#disable-or-modify-tools), [Impair Defenses](/tags/#impair-defenses) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
@@ -377,7 +378,7 @@ sidebar:
|
||||
| [Gsuite Drive Share In External Email](/cloud/gsuite_drive_share_in_external_email/) | [Exfiltration to Cloud Storage](/tags/#exfiltration-to-cloud-storage), [Exfiltration Over Web Service](/tags/#exfiltration-over-web-service) | [Anomaly](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Gsuite Email Suspicious Subject With Attachment](/cloud/gsuite_email_suspicious_subject_with_attachment/) | [Spearphishing Attachment](/tags/#spearphishing-attachment), [Phishing](/tags/#phishing) | [Anomaly](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Gsuite Email With Known Abuse Web Service Link](/cloud/gsuite_email_with_known_abuse_web_service_link/) | [Spearphishing Attachment](/tags/#spearphishing-attachment), [Phishing](/tags/#phishing) | [Anomaly](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Gsuite Outbound Email With Attachment To External Domain](/cloud/gsuite_outbound_email_with_attachment_to_external_domain/) | [Exfiltration Over Unencrypted/Obfuscated Non-C2 Protocol](/tags/#exfiltration-over-unencrypted/obfuscated-non-c2-protocol), [Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol](/tags/#exfiltration-over-alternative-protocol) | [Anomaly](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Gsuite Outbound Email With Attachment To External Domain](/cloud/gsuite_outbound_email_with_attachment_to_external_domain/) | [Exfiltration Over Unencrypted Non-C2 Protocol](/tags/#exfiltration-over-unencrypted-non-c2-protocol), [Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol](/tags/#exfiltration-over-alternative-protocol) | [Anomaly](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Gsuite Suspicious Shared File Name](/cloud/gsuite_suspicious_shared_file_name/) | [Spearphishing Attachment](/tags/#spearphishing-attachment), [Phishing](/tags/#phishing) | [Anomaly](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Gsuite suspicious calendar invite](/cloud/gsuite_suspicious_calendar_invite/) | [Phishing](/tags/#phishing) | [Hunting](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Hide User Account From Sign-In Screen](/endpoint/hide_user_account_from_sign-in_screen/) | [Disable or Modify Tools](/tags/#disable-or-modify-tools), [Impair Defenses](/tags/#impair-defenses) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
@@ -431,7 +432,7 @@ sidebar:
|
||||
| [Linux Add User Account](/endpoint/linux_add_user_account/) | [Local Account](/tags/#local-account), [Create Account](/tags/#create-account) | [Hunting](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Linux Adding Crontab Using List Parameter](/endpoint/linux_adding_crontab_using_list_parameter/) | [Cron](/tags/#cron), [Scheduled Task/Job](/tags/#scheduled-task/job) | [Hunting](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Linux At Allow Config File Creation](/endpoint/linux_at_allow_config_file_creation/) | [Cron](/tags/#cron), [Scheduled Task/Job](/tags/#scheduled-task/job) | [Anomaly](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Linux At Application Execution](/endpoint/linux_at_application_execution/) | [At (Linux)](/tags/#at-(linux)), [Scheduled Task/Job](/tags/#scheduled-task/job) | [Anomaly](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Linux At Application Execution](/endpoint/linux_at_application_execution/) | [At](/tags/#at), [Scheduled Task/Job](/tags/#scheduled-task/job) | [Anomaly](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Linux Change File Owner To Root](/endpoint/linux_change_file_owner_to_root/) | [Linux and Mac File and Directory Permissions Modification](/tags/#linux-and-mac-file-and-directory-permissions-modification), [File and Directory Permissions Modification](/tags/#file-and-directory-permissions-modification) | [Anomaly](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Linux Common Process For Elevation Control](/endpoint/linux_common_process_for_elevation_control/) | [Setuid and Setgid](/tags/#setuid-and-setgid), [Abuse Elevation Control Mechanism](/tags/#abuse-elevation-control-mechanism) | [Hunting](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Linux DD File Overwrite](/endpoint/linux_dd_file_overwrite/) | [Data Destruction](/tags/#data-destruction) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
@@ -458,7 +459,7 @@ sidebar:
|
||||
| [Linux Possible Access Or Modification Of sshd Config File](/endpoint/linux_possible_access_or_modification_of_sshd_config_file/) | [SSH Authorized Keys](/tags/#ssh-authorized-keys), [Account Manipulation](/tags/#account-manipulation) | [Anomaly](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Linux Possible Access To Credential Files](/endpoint/linux_possible_access_to_credential_files/) | [/etc/passwd and /etc/shadow](/tags/#/etc/passwd-and-/etc/shadow), [OS Credential Dumping](/tags/#os-credential-dumping) | [Anomaly](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Linux Possible Access To Sudoers File](/endpoint/linux_possible_access_to_sudoers_file/) | [Sudo and Sudo Caching](/tags/#sudo-and-sudo-caching), [Abuse Elevation Control Mechanism](/tags/#abuse-elevation-control-mechanism) | [Anomaly](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Linux Possible Append Command To At Allow Config File](/endpoint/linux_possible_append_command_to_at_allow_config_file/) | [At (Linux)](/tags/#at-(linux)), [Scheduled Task/Job](/tags/#scheduled-task/job) | [Anomaly](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Linux Possible Append Command To At Allow Config File](/endpoint/linux_possible_append_command_to_at_allow_config_file/) | [At](/tags/#at), [Scheduled Task/Job](/tags/#scheduled-task/job) | [Anomaly](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Linux Possible Append Command To Profile Config File](/endpoint/linux_possible_append_command_to_profile_config_file/) | [Unix Shell Configuration Modification](/tags/#unix-shell-configuration-modification), [Event Triggered Execution](/tags/#event-triggered-execution) | [Anomaly](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Linux Possible Append Cronjob Entry on Existing Cronjob File](/endpoint/linux_possible_append_cronjob_entry_on_existing_cronjob_file/) | [Cron](/tags/#cron), [Scheduled Task/Job](/tags/#scheduled-task/job) | [Hunting](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Linux Possible Cronjob Modification With Editor](/endpoint/linux_possible_cronjob_modification_with_editor/) | [Cron](/tags/#cron), [Scheduled Task/Job](/tags/#scheduled-task/job) | [Hunting](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
@@ -492,7 +493,7 @@ sidebar:
|
||||
| [MSI Module Loaded by Non-System Binary](/endpoint/msi_module_loaded_by_non-system_binary/) | [DLL Side-Loading](/tags/#dll-side-loading), [Hijack Execution Flow](/tags/#hijack-execution-flow) | [Hunting](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [MacOS - Re-opened Applications](/endpoint/macos_-_re-opened_applications/) | None | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [MacOS LOLbin](/endpoint/macos_lolbin/) | [Unix Shell](/tags/#unix-shell), [Command and Scripting Interpreter](/tags/#command-and-scripting-interpreter) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [MacOS plutil](/endpoint/macos_plutil/) | [Plist Modification](/tags/#plist-modification) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [MacOS plutil](/endpoint/macos_plutil/) | [Plist File Modification](/tags/#plist-file-modification) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Mailsniper Invoke functions](/endpoint/mailsniper_invoke_functions/) | [Email Collection](/tags/#email-collection), [Local Email Collection](/tags/#local-email-collection) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Malicious InProcServer32 Modification](/endpoint/malicious_inprocserver32_modification/) | [Regsvr32](/tags/#regsvr32), [Modify Registry](/tags/#modify-registry) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Malicious PowerShell Process - Encoded Command](/endpoint/malicious_powershell_process_-_encoded_command/) | [Obfuscated Files or Information](/tags/#obfuscated-files-or-information) | [Hunting](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
@@ -507,9 +508,9 @@ sidebar:
|
||||
| [Monitor Email For Brand Abuse](/application/monitor_email_for_brand_abuse/) | None | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Monitor Registry Keys for Print Monitors](/endpoint/monitor_registry_keys_for_print_monitors/) | [Port Monitors](/tags/#port-monitors), [Boot or Logon Autostart Execution](/tags/#boot-or-logon-autostart-execution) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Monitor Web Traffic For Brand Abuse](/web/monitor_web_traffic_for_brand_abuse/) | None | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Mshta spawning Rundll32 OR Regsvr32 Process](/endpoint/mshta_spawning_rundll32_or_regsvr32_process/) | [Signed Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#signed-binary-proxy-execution), [Mshta](/tags/#mshta) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Mshta spawning Rundll32 OR Regsvr32 Process](/endpoint/mshta_spawning_rundll32_or_regsvr32_process/) | [System Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#system-binary-proxy-execution), [Mshta](/tags/#mshta) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Msmpeng Application DLL Side Loading](/endpoint/msmpeng_application_dll_side_loading/) | [DLL Side-Loading](/tags/#dll-side-loading), [Hijack Execution Flow](/tags/#hijack-execution-flow) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Multiple Archive Files Http Post Traffic](/network/multiple_archive_files_http_post_traffic/) | [Exfiltration Over Unencrypted/Obfuscated Non-C2 Protocol](/tags/#exfiltration-over-unencrypted/obfuscated-non-c2-protocol), [Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol](/tags/#exfiltration-over-alternative-protocol) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Multiple Archive Files Http Post Traffic](/network/multiple_archive_files_http_post_traffic/) | [Exfiltration Over Unencrypted Non-C2 Protocol](/tags/#exfiltration-over-unencrypted-non-c2-protocol), [Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol](/tags/#exfiltration-over-alternative-protocol) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Multiple Invalid Users Failing To Authenticate From Host Using NTLM](/endpoint/multiple_invalid_users_failing_to_authenticate_from_host_using_ntlm/) | [Password Spraying](/tags/#password-spraying), [Brute Force](/tags/#brute-force) | [Anomaly](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Multiple Okta Users With Invalid Credentials From The Same IP](/application/multiple_okta_users_with_invalid_credentials_from_the_same_ip/) | [Valid Accounts](/tags/#valid-accounts), [Default Accounts](/tags/#default-accounts) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Multiple Users Failing To Authenticate From Host Using Kerberos](/endpoint/multiple_users_failing_to_authenticate_from_host_using_kerberos/) | [Password Spraying](/tags/#password-spraying), [Brute Force](/tags/#brute-force) | [Anomaly](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
@@ -546,7 +547,7 @@ sidebar:
|
||||
| [Office Document Creating Schedule Task](/endpoint/office_document_creating_schedule_task/) | [Phishing](/tags/#phishing), [Spearphishing Attachment](/tags/#spearphishing-attachment) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Office Document Executing Macro Code](/endpoint/office_document_executing_macro_code/) | [Phishing](/tags/#phishing), [Spearphishing Attachment](/tags/#spearphishing-attachment) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Office Document Spawned Child Process To Download](/endpoint/office_document_spawned_child_process_to_download/) | [Phishing](/tags/#phishing), [Spearphishing Attachment](/tags/#spearphishing-attachment) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Office Product Spawn CMD Process](/endpoint/office_product_spawn_cmd_process/) | [Signed Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#signed-binary-proxy-execution), [Mshta](/tags/#mshta) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Office Product Spawn CMD Process](/endpoint/office_product_spawn_cmd_process/) | [System Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#system-binary-proxy-execution), [Mshta](/tags/#mshta) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Office Product Spawning BITSAdmin](/endpoint/office_product_spawning_bitsadmin/) | [Phishing](/tags/#phishing), [Spearphishing Attachment](/tags/#spearphishing-attachment) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Office Product Spawning CertUtil](/endpoint/office_product_spawning_certutil/) | [Phishing](/tags/#phishing), [Spearphishing Attachment](/tags/#spearphishing-attachment) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Office Product Spawning MSHTA](/endpoint/office_product_spawning_mshta/) | [Phishing](/tags/#phishing), [Spearphishing Attachment](/tags/#spearphishing-attachment) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
@@ -567,7 +568,7 @@ sidebar:
|
||||
| [PetitPotam Network Share Access Request](/endpoint/petitpotam_network_share_access_request/) | [Forced Authentication](/tags/#forced-authentication) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [PetitPotam Suspicious Kerberos TGT Request](/endpoint/petitpotam_suspicious_kerberos_tgt_request/) | [OS Credential Dumping](/tags/#os-credential-dumping) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Ping Sleep Batch Command](/endpoint/ping_sleep_batch_command/) | [Virtualization/Sandbox Evasion](/tags/#virtualization/sandbox-evasion), [Time Based Evasion](/tags/#time-based-evasion) | [Anomaly](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Plain HTTP POST Exfiltrated Data](/network/plain_http_post_exfiltrated_data/) | [Exfiltration Over Unencrypted/Obfuscated Non-C2 Protocol](/tags/#exfiltration-over-unencrypted/obfuscated-non-c2-protocol), [Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol](/tags/#exfiltration-over-alternative-protocol) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Plain HTTP POST Exfiltrated Data](/network/plain_http_post_exfiltrated_data/) | [Exfiltration Over Unencrypted Non-C2 Protocol](/tags/#exfiltration-over-unencrypted-non-c2-protocol), [Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol](/tags/#exfiltration-over-alternative-protocol) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Possible Browser Pass View Parameter](/endpoint/possible_browser_pass_view_parameter/) | [Credentials from Web Browsers](/tags/#credentials-from-web-browsers), [Credentials from Password Stores](/tags/#credentials-from-password-stores) | [Hunting](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Possible Lateral Movement PowerShell Spawn](/endpoint/possible_lateral_movement_powershell_spawn/) | [Remote Services](/tags/#remote-services), [Distributed Component Object Model](/tags/#distributed-component-object-model), [Windows Remote Management](/tags/#windows-remote-management), [Windows Management Instrumentation](/tags/#windows-management-instrumentation), [Scheduled Task](/tags/#scheduled-task), [Windows Service](/tags/#windows-service), [PowerShell](/tags/#powershell) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Potentially malicious code on commandline](/endpoint/potentially_malicious_code_on_commandline/) | [Windows Command Shell](/tags/#windows-command-shell) | [Anomaly](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
@@ -603,7 +604,7 @@ sidebar:
|
||||
| [Processes launching netsh](/endpoint/processes_launching_netsh/) | [Disable or Modify System Firewall](/tags/#disable-or-modify-system-firewall), [Impair Defenses](/tags/#impair-defenses) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Prohibited Network Traffic Allowed](/network/prohibited_network_traffic_allowed/) | [Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol](/tags/#exfiltration-over-alternative-protocol) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Prohibited Software On Endpoint](/deprecated/prohibited_software_on_endpoint/) | None | [Hunting](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Protocol or Port Mismatch](/network/protocol_or_port_mismatch/) | [Exfiltration Over Unencrypted/Obfuscated Non-C2 Protocol](/tags/#exfiltration-over-unencrypted/obfuscated-non-c2-protocol), [Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol](/tags/#exfiltration-over-alternative-protocol) | [Anomaly](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Protocol or Port Mismatch](/network/protocol_or_port_mismatch/) | [Exfiltration Over Unencrypted Non-C2 Protocol](/tags/#exfiltration-over-unencrypted-non-c2-protocol), [Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol](/tags/#exfiltration-over-alternative-protocol) | [Anomaly](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Protocols passing authentication in cleartext](/network/protocols_passing_authentication_in_cleartext/) | None | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Randomly Generated Scheduled Task Name](/endpoint/randomly_generated_scheduled_task_name/) | [Scheduled Task/Job](/tags/#scheduled-task/job), [Scheduled Task](/tags/#scheduled-task) | [Hunting](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Randomly Generated Windows Service Name](/endpoint/randomly_generated_windows_service_name/) | [Create or Modify System Process](/tags/#create-or-modify-system-process), [Windows Service](/tags/#windows-service) | [Hunting](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
@@ -616,8 +617,8 @@ sidebar:
|
||||
| [Registry Keys Used For Persistence](/endpoint/registry_keys_used_for_persistence/) | [Registry Run Keys / Startup Folder](/tags/#registry-run-keys-/-startup-folder), [Boot or Logon Autostart Execution](/tags/#boot-or-logon-autostart-execution) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Registry Keys Used For Privilege Escalation](/endpoint/registry_keys_used_for_privilege_escalation/) | [Image File Execution Options Injection](/tags/#image-file-execution-options-injection), [Event Triggered Execution](/tags/#event-triggered-execution) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Registry Keys for Creating SHIM Databases](/endpoint/registry_keys_for_creating_shim_databases/) | [Application Shimming](/tags/#application-shimming), [Event Triggered Execution](/tags/#event-triggered-execution) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Regsvr32 Silent and Install Param Dll Loading](/endpoint/regsvr32_silent_and_install_param_dll_loading/) | [Signed Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#signed-binary-proxy-execution), [Regsvr32](/tags/#regsvr32) | [Anomaly](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Regsvr32 with Known Silent Switch Cmdline](/endpoint/regsvr32_with_known_silent_switch_cmdline/) | [Signed Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#signed-binary-proxy-execution), [Regsvr32](/tags/#regsvr32) | [Anomaly](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Regsvr32 Silent and Install Param Dll Loading](/endpoint/regsvr32_silent_and_install_param_dll_loading/) | [System Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#system-binary-proxy-execution), [Regsvr32](/tags/#regsvr32) | [Anomaly](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Regsvr32 with Known Silent Switch Cmdline](/endpoint/regsvr32_with_known_silent_switch_cmdline/) | [System Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#system-binary-proxy-execution), [Regsvr32](/tags/#regsvr32) | [Anomaly](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Remcos RAT File Creation in Remcos Folder](/endpoint/remcos_rat_file_creation_in_remcos_folder/) | [Screen Capture](/tags/#screen-capture) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Remcos client registry install entry](/endpoint/remcos_client_registry_install_entry/) | [Modify Registry](/tags/#modify-registry) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Remote Desktop Network Bruteforce](/network/remote_desktop_network_bruteforce/) | [Remote Desktop Protocol](/tags/#remote-desktop-protocol), [Remote Services](/tags/#remote-services) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
@@ -642,16 +643,16 @@ sidebar:
|
||||
| [Revil Registry Entry](/endpoint/revil_registry_entry/) | [Modify Registry](/tags/#modify-registry) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Rubeus Command Line Parameters](/endpoint/rubeus_command_line_parameters/) | [Use Alternate Authentication Material](/tags/#use-alternate-authentication-material), [Pass the Ticket](/tags/#pass-the-ticket), [Steal or Forge Kerberos Tickets](/tags/#steal-or-forge-kerberos-tickets), [Kerberoasting](/tags/#kerberoasting), [AS-REP Roasting](/tags/#as-rep-roasting) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Rubeus Kerberos Ticket Exports Through Winlogon Access](/endpoint/rubeus_kerberos_ticket_exports_through_winlogon_access/) | [Use Alternate Authentication Material](/tags/#use-alternate-authentication-material), [Pass the Ticket](/tags/#pass-the-ticket) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [RunDLL Loading DLL By Ordinal](/endpoint/rundll_loading_dll_by_ordinal/) | [Signed Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#signed-binary-proxy-execution), [Rundll32](/tags/#rundll32) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [RunDLL Loading DLL By Ordinal](/endpoint/rundll_loading_dll_by_ordinal/) | [System Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#system-binary-proxy-execution), [Rundll32](/tags/#rundll32) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Runas Execution in CommandLine](/endpoint/runas_execution_in_commandline/) | [Access Token Manipulation](/tags/#access-token-manipulation), [Token Impersonation/Theft](/tags/#token-impersonation/theft) | [Hunting](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Rundll32 Control RunDLL Hunt](/endpoint/rundll32_control_rundll_hunt/) | [Signed Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#signed-binary-proxy-execution), [Rundll32](/tags/#rundll32) | [Hunting](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Rundll32 Control RunDLL World Writable Directory](/endpoint/rundll32_control_rundll_world_writable_directory/) | [Signed Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#signed-binary-proxy-execution), [Rundll32](/tags/#rundll32) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Rundll32 Control RunDLL Hunt](/endpoint/rundll32_control_rundll_hunt/) | [System Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#system-binary-proxy-execution), [Rundll32](/tags/#rundll32) | [Hunting](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Rundll32 Control RunDLL World Writable Directory](/endpoint/rundll32_control_rundll_world_writable_directory/) | [System Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#system-binary-proxy-execution), [Rundll32](/tags/#rundll32) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Rundll32 Create Remote Thread To A Process](/endpoint/rundll32_create_remote_thread_to_a_process/) | [Process Injection](/tags/#process-injection) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Rundll32 CreateRemoteThread In Browser](/endpoint/rundll32_createremotethread_in_browser/) | [Process Injection](/tags/#process-injection) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Rundll32 DNSQuery](/endpoint/rundll32_dnsquery/) | [Signed Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#signed-binary-proxy-execution), [Rundll32](/tags/#rundll32) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Rundll32 Process Creating Exe Dll Files](/endpoint/rundll32_process_creating_exe_dll_files/) | [Signed Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#signed-binary-proxy-execution), [Rundll32](/tags/#rundll32) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Rundll32 DNSQuery](/endpoint/rundll32_dnsquery/) | [System Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#system-binary-proxy-execution), [Rundll32](/tags/#rundll32) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Rundll32 Process Creating Exe Dll Files](/endpoint/rundll32_process_creating_exe_dll_files/) | [System Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#system-binary-proxy-execution), [Rundll32](/tags/#rundll32) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Rundll32 Shimcache Flush](/endpoint/rundll32_shimcache_flush/) | [Modify Registry](/tags/#modify-registry) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Rundll32 with no Command Line Arguments with Network](/endpoint/rundll32_with_no_command_line_arguments_with_network/) | [Signed Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#signed-binary-proxy-execution), [Rundll32](/tags/#rundll32) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Rundll32 with no Command Line Arguments with Network](/endpoint/rundll32_with_no_command_line_arguments_with_network/) | [System Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#system-binary-proxy-execution), [Rundll32](/tags/#rundll32) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Ryuk Test Files Detected](/endpoint/ryuk_test_files_detected/) | [Data Encrypted for Impact](/tags/#data-encrypted-for-impact) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Ryuk Wake on LAN Command](/endpoint/ryuk_wake_on_lan_command/) | [Command and Scripting Interpreter](/tags/#command-and-scripting-interpreter), [Windows Command Shell](/tags/#windows-command-shell) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [SAM Database File Access Attempt](/endpoint/sam_database_file_access_attempt/) | [Security Account Manager](/tags/#security-account-manager), [OS Credential Dumping](/tags/#os-credential-dumping) | [Hunting](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
@@ -665,7 +666,7 @@ sidebar:
|
||||
| [SchCache Change By App Connect And Create ADSI Object](/endpoint/schcache_change_by_app_connect_and_create_adsi_object/) | [Domain Account](/tags/#domain-account), [Account Discovery](/tags/#account-discovery) | [Anomaly](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Schedule Task with HTTP Command Arguments](/endpoint/schedule_task_with_http_command_arguments/) | [Scheduled Task/Job](/tags/#scheduled-task/job) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Schedule Task with Rundll32 Command Trigger](/endpoint/schedule_task_with_rundll32_command_trigger/) | [Scheduled Task/Job](/tags/#scheduled-task/job) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Scheduled Task Creation on Remote Endpoint using At](/endpoint/scheduled_task_creation_on_remote_endpoint_using_at/) | [Scheduled Task/Job](/tags/#scheduled-task/job), [At (Windows)](/tags/#at-(windows)) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Scheduled Task Creation on Remote Endpoint using At](/endpoint/scheduled_task_creation_on_remote_endpoint_using_at/) | [Scheduled Task/Job](/tags/#scheduled-task/job), [At](/tags/#at) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Scheduled Task Deleted Or Created via CMD](/endpoint/scheduled_task_deleted_or_created_via_cmd/) | [Scheduled Task](/tags/#scheduled-task), [Scheduled Task/Job](/tags/#scheduled-task/job) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Scheduled Task Initiation on Remote Endpoint](/endpoint/scheduled_task_initiation_on_remote_endpoint/) | [Scheduled Task/Job](/tags/#scheduled-task/job), [Scheduled Task](/tags/#scheduled-task) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Scheduled tasks used in BadRabbit ransomware](/deprecated/scheduled_tasks_used_in_badrabbit_ransomware/) | [Scheduled Task](/tags/#scheduled-task) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
@@ -691,10 +692,20 @@ sidebar:
|
||||
| [Single Letter Process On Endpoint](/endpoint/single_letter_process_on_endpoint/) | [User Execution](/tags/#user-execution), [Malicious File](/tags/#malicious-file) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Spectre and Meltdown Vulnerable Systems](/deprecated/spectre_and_meltdown_vulnerable_systems/) | None | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Spike in File Writes](/endpoint/spike_in_file_writes/) | None | [Anomaly](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Splunk Command and Scripting Interpreter Delete Usage](/application/splunk_command_and_scripting_interpreter_delete_usage/) | [Command and Scripting Interpreter](/tags/#command-and-scripting-interpreter) | [Anomaly](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Splunk Command and Scripting Interpreter Risky Commands](/application/splunk_command_and_scripting_interpreter_risky_commands/) | [Command and Scripting Interpreter](/tags/#command-and-scripting-interpreter) | [Hunting](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Splunk Command and Scripting Interpreter Risky SPL MLTK](/application/splunk_command_and_scripting_interpreter_risky_spl_mltk/) | [Command and Scripting Interpreter](/tags/#command-and-scripting-interpreter) | [Anomaly](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Splunk Digital Certificates Infrastructure Version](/application/splunk_digital_certificates_infrastructure_version/) | [Digital Certificates](/tags/#digital-certificates) | [Hunting](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Splunk Digital Certificates Lack of Encryption](/application/splunk_digital_certificates_lack_of_encryption/) | [Digital Certificates](/tags/#digital-certificates) | [Anomaly](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Splunk DoS via Malformed S2S Request](/application/splunk_dos_via_malformed_s2s_request/) | [Network Denial of Service](/tags/#network-denial-of-service) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Splunk Enterprise Information Disclosure](/deprecated/splunk_enterprise_information_disclosure/) | None | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Splunk Identified SSL TLS Certificates](/network/splunk_identified_ssl_tls_certificates/) | [Network Sniffing](/tags/#network-sniffing) | [Hunting](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Splunk Process Injection Forwarder Bundle Downloads](/application/splunk_process_injection_forwarder_bundle_downloads/) | [Process Injection](/tags/#process-injection) | [Hunting](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Splunk Protocol Impersonation Weak Encryption Configuration](/application/splunk_protocol_impersonation_weak_encryption_configuration/) | [Protocol Impersonation](/tags/#protocol-impersonation) | [Hunting](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Splunk User Enumeration Attempt](/application/splunk_user_enumeration_attempt/) | [Valid Accounts](/tags/#valid-accounts) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Splunk XSS in Monitoring Console](/application/splunk_xss_in_monitoring_console/) | [Drive-by Compromise](/tags/#drive-by-compromise) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Splunk protocol impersonation weak encryption selfsigned](/application/splunk_protocol_impersonation_weak_encryption_selfsigned/) | [Digital Certificates](/tags/#digital-certificates) | [Hunting](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Splunk protocol impersonation weak encryption simplerequest](/application/splunk_protocol_impersonation_weak_encryption_simplerequest/) | [Digital Certificates](/tags/#digital-certificates) | [Hunting](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Spoolsv Spawning Rundll32](/endpoint/spoolsv_spawning_rundll32/) | [Print Processors](/tags/#print-processors), [Boot or Logon Autostart Execution](/tags/#boot-or-logon-autostart-execution) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Spoolsv Suspicious Loaded Modules](/endpoint/spoolsv_suspicious_loaded_modules/) | [Print Processors](/tags/#print-processors), [Boot or Logon Autostart Execution](/tags/#boot-or-logon-autostart-execution) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Spoolsv Suspicious Process Access](/endpoint/spoolsv_suspicious_process_access/) | [Exploitation for Privilege Escalation](/tags/#exploitation-for-privilege-escalation) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
@@ -715,7 +726,7 @@ sidebar:
|
||||
| [Suspicious Event Log Service Behavior](/endpoint/suspicious_event_log_service_behavior/) | [Indicator Removal on Host](/tags/#indicator-removal-on-host), [Clear Windows Event Logs](/tags/#clear-windows-event-logs) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Suspicious File Write](/deprecated/suspicious_file_write/) | None | [Hunting](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Suspicious GPUpdate no Command Line Arguments](/endpoint/suspicious_gpupdate_no_command_line_arguments/) | [Process Injection](/tags/#process-injection) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Suspicious IcedID Rundll32 Cmdline](/endpoint/suspicious_icedid_rundll32_cmdline/) | [Signed Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#signed-binary-proxy-execution), [Rundll32](/tags/#rundll32) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Suspicious IcedID Rundll32 Cmdline](/endpoint/suspicious_icedid_rundll32_cmdline/) | [System Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#system-binary-proxy-execution), [Rundll32](/tags/#rundll32) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Suspicious Image Creation In Appdata Folder](/endpoint/suspicious_image_creation_in_appdata_folder/) | [Screen Capture](/tags/#screen-capture) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Suspicious Java Classes](/application/suspicious_java_classes/) | None | [Anomaly](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Suspicious Kerberos Service Ticket Request](/endpoint/suspicious_kerberos_service_ticket_request/) | [Valid Accounts](/tags/#valid-accounts), [Domain Accounts](/tags/#domain-accounts) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
@@ -729,12 +740,12 @@ sidebar:
|
||||
| [Suspicious Process File Path](/endpoint/suspicious_process_file_path/) | [Create or Modify System Process](/tags/#create-or-modify-system-process) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Suspicious Process With Discord DNS Query](/endpoint/suspicious_process_with_discord_dns_query/) | [Visual Basic](/tags/#visual-basic), [Command and Scripting Interpreter](/tags/#command-and-scripting-interpreter) | [Anomaly](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Suspicious Reg exe Process](/endpoint/suspicious_reg_exe_process/) | [Modify Registry](/tags/#modify-registry) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Suspicious Regsvr32 Register Suspicious Path](/endpoint/suspicious_regsvr32_register_suspicious_path/) | [Signed Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#signed-binary-proxy-execution), [Regsvr32](/tags/#regsvr32) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Suspicious Rundll32 PluginInit](/endpoint/suspicious_rundll32_plugininit/) | [Signed Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#signed-binary-proxy-execution), [Rundll32](/tags/#rundll32) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Suspicious Rundll32 Rename](/deprecated/suspicious_rundll32_rename/) | [Signed Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#signed-binary-proxy-execution), [Masquerading](/tags/#masquerading), [Rundll32](/tags/#rundll32), [Rename System Utilities](/tags/#rename-system-utilities) | [Hunting](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Suspicious Rundll32 StartW](/endpoint/suspicious_rundll32_startw/) | [Signed Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#signed-binary-proxy-execution), [Rundll32](/tags/#rundll32) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Suspicious Rundll32 dllregisterserver](/endpoint/suspicious_rundll32_dllregisterserver/) | [Signed Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#signed-binary-proxy-execution), [Rundll32](/tags/#rundll32) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Suspicious Rundll32 no Command Line Arguments](/endpoint/suspicious_rundll32_no_command_line_arguments/) | [Signed Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#signed-binary-proxy-execution), [Rundll32](/tags/#rundll32) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Suspicious Regsvr32 Register Suspicious Path](/endpoint/suspicious_regsvr32_register_suspicious_path/) | [System Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#system-binary-proxy-execution), [Regsvr32](/tags/#regsvr32) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Suspicious Rundll32 PluginInit](/endpoint/suspicious_rundll32_plugininit/) | [System Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#system-binary-proxy-execution), [Rundll32](/tags/#rundll32) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Suspicious Rundll32 Rename](/deprecated/suspicious_rundll32_rename/) | [System Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#system-binary-proxy-execution), [Masquerading](/tags/#masquerading), [Rundll32](/tags/#rundll32), [Rename System Utilities](/tags/#rename-system-utilities) | [Hunting](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Suspicious Rundll32 StartW](/endpoint/suspicious_rundll32_startw/) | [System Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#system-binary-proxy-execution), [Rundll32](/tags/#rundll32) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Suspicious Rundll32 dllregisterserver](/endpoint/suspicious_rundll32_dllregisterserver/) | [System Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#system-binary-proxy-execution), [Rundll32](/tags/#rundll32) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Suspicious Rundll32 no Command Line Arguments](/endpoint/suspicious_rundll32_no_command_line_arguments/) | [System Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#system-binary-proxy-execution), [Rundll32](/tags/#rundll32) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Suspicious SQLite3 LSQuarantine Behavior](/endpoint/suspicious_sqlite3_lsquarantine_behavior/) | [Data Staged](/tags/#data-staged) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Suspicious Scheduled Task from Public Directory](/endpoint/suspicious_scheduled_task_from_public_directory/) | [Scheduled Task](/tags/#scheduled-task), [Scheduled Task/Job](/tags/#scheduled-task/job) | [Anomaly](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Suspicious SearchProtocolHost no Command Line Arguments](/endpoint/suspicious_searchprotocolhost_no_command_line_arguments/) | [Process Injection](/tags/#process-injection) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
@@ -743,8 +754,8 @@ sidebar:
|
||||
| [Suspicious microsoft workflow compiler rename](/endpoint/suspicious_microsoft_workflow_compiler_rename/) | [Masquerading](/tags/#masquerading), [Trusted Developer Utilities Proxy Execution](/tags/#trusted-developer-utilities-proxy-execution), [Rename System Utilities](/tags/#rename-system-utilities) | [Hunting](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Suspicious microsoft workflow compiler usage](/endpoint/suspicious_microsoft_workflow_compiler_usage/) | [Trusted Developer Utilities Proxy Execution](/tags/#trusted-developer-utilities-proxy-execution) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Suspicious msbuild path](/endpoint/suspicious_msbuild_path/) | [Masquerading](/tags/#masquerading), [Trusted Developer Utilities Proxy Execution](/tags/#trusted-developer-utilities-proxy-execution), [Rename System Utilities](/tags/#rename-system-utilities), [MSBuild](/tags/#msbuild) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Suspicious mshta child process](/endpoint/suspicious_mshta_child_process/) | [Signed Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#signed-binary-proxy-execution), [Mshta](/tags/#mshta) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Suspicious mshta spawn](/endpoint/suspicious_mshta_spawn/) | [Signed Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#signed-binary-proxy-execution), [Mshta](/tags/#mshta) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Suspicious mshta child process](/endpoint/suspicious_mshta_child_process/) | [System Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#system-binary-proxy-execution), [Mshta](/tags/#mshta) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Suspicious mshta spawn](/endpoint/suspicious_mshta_spawn/) | [System Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#system-binary-proxy-execution), [Mshta](/tags/#mshta) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Suspicious wevtutil Usage](/endpoint/suspicious_wevtutil_usage/) | [Clear Windows Event Logs](/tags/#clear-windows-event-logs), [Indicator Removal on Host](/tags/#indicator-removal-on-host) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Suspicious writes to System Volume Information](/deprecated/suspicious_writes_to_system_volume_information/) | [Masquerading](/tags/#masquerading) | [Hunting](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Suspicious writes to windows Recycle Bin](/endpoint/suspicious_writes_to_windows_recycle_bin/) | [Masquerading](/tags/#masquerading) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
@@ -758,11 +769,11 @@ sidebar:
|
||||
| [Time Provider Persistence Registry](/endpoint/time_provider_persistence_registry/) | [Time Providers](/tags/#time-providers), [Boot or Logon Autostart Execution](/tags/#boot-or-logon-autostart-execution) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Trickbot Named Pipe](/endpoint/trickbot_named_pipe/) | [Process Injection](/tags/#process-injection) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [UAC Bypass MMC Load Unsigned Dll](/endpoint/uac_bypass_mmc_load_unsigned_dll/) | [Bypass User Account Control](/tags/#bypass-user-account-control), [Abuse Elevation Control Mechanism](/tags/#abuse-elevation-control-mechanism) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [UAC Bypass With Colorui COM Object](/endpoint/uac_bypass_with_colorui_com_object/) | [Signed Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#signed-binary-proxy-execution), [CMSTP](/tags/#cmstp) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [UAC Bypass With Colorui COM Object](/endpoint/uac_bypass_with_colorui_com_object/) | [System Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#system-binary-proxy-execution), [CMSTP](/tags/#cmstp) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [USN Journal Deletion](/endpoint/usn_journal_deletion/) | [Indicator Removal on Host](/tags/#indicator-removal-on-host) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Uncommon Processes On Endpoint](/deprecated/uncommon_processes_on_endpoint/) | [Malicious File](/tags/#malicious-file) | [Hunting](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Unified Messaging Service Spawning a Process](/endpoint/unified_messaging_service_spawning_a_process/) | [Exploit Public-Facing Application](/tags/#exploit-public-facing-application) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Uninstall App Using MsiExec](/endpoint/uninstall_app_using_msiexec/) | [Msiexec](/tags/#msiexec), [Signed Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#signed-binary-proxy-execution) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Uninstall App Using MsiExec](/endpoint/uninstall_app_using_msiexec/) | [Msiexec](/tags/#msiexec), [System Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#system-binary-proxy-execution) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Unknown Process Using The Kerberos Protocol](/endpoint/unknown_process_using_the_kerberos_protocol/) | [Use Alternate Authentication Material](/tags/#use-alternate-authentication-material) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Unload Sysmon Filter Driver](/endpoint/unload_sysmon_filter_driver/) | [Disable or Modify Tools](/tags/#disable-or-modify-tools), [Impair Defenses](/tags/#impair-defenses) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Unloading AMSI via Reflection](/endpoint/unloading_amsi_via_reflection/) | [Impair Defenses](/tags/#impair-defenses), [PowerShell](/tags/#powershell), [Command and Scripting Interpreter](/tags/#command-and-scripting-interpreter) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
@@ -779,7 +790,7 @@ sidebar:
|
||||
| [VMware Server Side Template Injection Hunt](/web/vmware_server_side_template_injection_hunt/) | [Exploit Public-Facing Application](/tags/#exploit-public-facing-application) | [Hunting](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [VMware Workspace ONE Freemarker Server-side Template Injection](/web/vmware_workspace_one_freemarker_server-side_template_injection/) | [Exploit Public-Facing Application](/tags/#exploit-public-facing-application) | [Anomaly](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Vbscript Execution Using Wscript App](/endpoint/vbscript_execution_using_wscript_app/) | [Visual Basic](/tags/#visual-basic), [Command and Scripting Interpreter](/tags/#command-and-scripting-interpreter) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Verclsid CLSID Execution](/endpoint/verclsid_clsid_execution/) | [Verclsid](/tags/#verclsid), [Signed Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#signed-binary-proxy-execution) | [Hunting](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Verclsid CLSID Execution](/endpoint/verclsid_clsid_execution/) | [Verclsid](/tags/#verclsid), [System Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#system-binary-proxy-execution) | [Hunting](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [W3WP Spawning Shell](/endpoint/w3wp_spawning_shell/) | [Server Software Component](/tags/#server-software-component), [Web Shell](/tags/#web-shell) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [WBAdmin Delete System Backups](/endpoint/wbadmin_delete_system_backups/) | [Inhibit System Recovery](/tags/#inhibit-system-recovery) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [WMI Permanent Event Subscription](/endpoint/wmi_permanent_event_subscription/) | [Windows Management Instrumentation](/tags/#windows-management-instrumentation) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
@@ -788,7 +799,7 @@ sidebar:
|
||||
| [WMI Temporary Event Subscription](/endpoint/wmi_temporary_event_subscription/) | [Windows Management Instrumentation](/tags/#windows-management-instrumentation) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [WMIC XSL Execution via URL](/endpoint/wmic_xsl_execution_via_url/) | [XSL Script Processing](/tags/#xsl-script-processing) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [WSReset UAC Bypass](/endpoint/wsreset_uac_bypass/) | [Bypass User Account Control](/tags/#bypass-user-account-control), [Abuse Elevation Control Mechanism](/tags/#abuse-elevation-control-mechanism) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Wbemprox COM Object Execution](/endpoint/wbemprox_com_object_execution/) | [Signed Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#signed-binary-proxy-execution), [CMSTP](/tags/#cmstp) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Wbemprox COM Object Execution](/endpoint/wbemprox_com_object_execution/) | [System Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#system-binary-proxy-execution), [CMSTP](/tags/#cmstp) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Web Fraud - Account Harvesting](/deprecated/web_fraud_-_account_harvesting/) | [Create Account](/tags/#create-account) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Web Fraud - Anomalous User Clickspeed](/deprecated/web_fraud_-_anomalous_user_clickspeed/) | [Valid Accounts](/tags/#valid-accounts) | [Anomaly](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Web Fraud - Password Sharing Across Accounts](/deprecated/web_fraud_-_password_sharing_across_accounts/) | None | [Anomaly](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
@@ -805,6 +816,8 @@ sidebar:
|
||||
| [WinEvent Windows Task Scheduler Event Action Started](/endpoint/winevent_windows_task_scheduler_event_action_started/) | [Scheduled Task](/tags/#scheduled-task) | [Hunting](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [WinRM Spawning a Process](/endpoint/winrm_spawning_a_process/) | [Exploit Public-Facing Application](/tags/#exploit-public-facing-application) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Windows AdFind Exe](/endpoint/windows_adfind_exe/) | [Remote System Discovery](/tags/#remote-system-discovery) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Windows Command and Scripting Interpreter Hunting Path Traversal](/endpoint/windows_command_and_scripting_interpreter_hunting_path_traversal/) | [Command and Scripting Interpreter](/tags/#command-and-scripting-interpreter) | [Hunting](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Windows Command and Scripting Interpreter Path Traversal Exec](/endpoint/windows_command_and_scripting_interpreter_path_traversal_exec/) | [Command and Scripting Interpreter](/tags/#command-and-scripting-interpreter) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Windows Computer Account Created by Computer Account](/endpoint/windows_computer_account_created_by_computer_account/) | [Steal or Forge Kerberos Tickets](/tags/#steal-or-forge-kerberos-tickets) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Windows Computer Account Requesting Kerberos Ticket](/endpoint/windows_computer_account_requesting_kerberos_ticket/) | [Steal or Forge Kerberos Tickets](/tags/#steal-or-forge-kerberos-tickets) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Windows Computer Account With SPN](/endpoint/windows_computer_account_with_spn/) | [Steal or Forge Kerberos Tickets](/tags/#steal-or-forge-kerberos-tickets) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
@@ -823,13 +836,14 @@ sidebar:
|
||||
| [Windows DisableAntiSpyware Registry](/endpoint/windows_disableantispyware_registry/) | [Disable or Modify Tools](/tags/#disable-or-modify-tools), [Impair Defenses](/tags/#impair-defenses) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Windows Disabled Users Failing To Authenticate Kerberos](/endpoint/windows_disabled_users_failing_to_authenticate_kerberos/) | [Password Spraying](/tags/#password-spraying), [Brute Force](/tags/#brute-force) | [Anomaly](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Windows DiskCryptor Usage](/endpoint/windows_diskcryptor_usage/) | [Data Encrypted for Impact](/tags/#data-encrypted-for-impact) | [Hunting](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Windows Diskshadow Proxy Execution](/endpoint/windows_diskshadow_proxy_execution/) | [Signed Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#signed-binary-proxy-execution) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Windows DotNet Binary in Non Standard Path](/endpoint/windows_dotnet_binary_in_non_standard_path/) | [Masquerading](/tags/#masquerading), [Rename System Utilities](/tags/#rename-system-utilities), [Signed Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#signed-binary-proxy-execution), [InstallUtil](/tags/#installutil) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Windows Diskshadow Proxy Execution](/endpoint/windows_diskshadow_proxy_execution/) | [System Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#system-binary-proxy-execution) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Windows DotNet Binary in Non Standard Path](/endpoint/windows_dotnet_binary_in_non_standard_path/) | [Masquerading](/tags/#masquerading), [Rename System Utilities](/tags/#rename-system-utilities), [System Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#system-binary-proxy-execution), [InstallUtil](/tags/#installutil) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Windows Driver Load Non-Standard Path](/endpoint/windows_driver_load_non-standard_path/) | [Rootkit](/tags/#rootkit) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Windows Drivers Loaded by Signature](/endpoint/windows_drivers_loaded_by_signature/) | [Rootkit](/tags/#rootkit), [Exploitation for Privilege Escalation](/tags/#exploitation-for-privilege-escalation) | [Hunting](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Windows Event For Service Disabled](/endpoint/windows_event_for_service_disabled/) | [Disable or Modify Tools](/tags/#disable-or-modify-tools), [Impair Defenses](/tags/#impair-defenses) | [Hunting](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Windows Event Log Cleared](/endpoint/windows_event_log_cleared/) | [Indicator Removal on Host](/tags/#indicator-removal-on-host), [Clear Windows Event Logs](/tags/#clear-windows-event-logs) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Windows Excessive Disabled Services Event](/endpoint/windows_excessive_disabled_services_event/) | [Disable or Modify Tools](/tags/#disable-or-modify-tools), [Impair Defenses](/tags/#impair-defenses) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Windows Execute Arbitrary Commands with MSDT](/endpoint/windows_execute_arbitrary_commands_with_msdt/) | [System Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#system-binary-proxy-execution) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Windows File Without Extension In Critical Folder](/endpoint/windows_file_without_extension_in_critical_folder/) | [Data Destruction](/tags/#data-destruction) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Windows Get-AdComputer Unconstrained Delegation Discovery](/endpoint/windows_get-adcomputer_unconstrained_delegation_discovery/) | [Remote System Discovery](/tags/#remote-system-discovery) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Windows Hidden Schedule Task Settings](/endpoint/windows_hidden_schedule_task_settings/) | [Scheduled Task/Job](/tags/#scheduled-task/job) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
@@ -839,12 +853,12 @@ sidebar:
|
||||
| [Windows ISO LNK File Creation](/endpoint/windows_iso_lnk_file_creation/) | [Spearphishing Attachment](/tags/#spearphishing-attachment), [Phishing](/tags/#phishing), [Malicious Link](/tags/#malicious-link), [User Execution](/tags/#user-execution) | [Hunting](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Windows Indirect Command Execution Via forfiles](/endpoint/windows_indirect_command_execution_via_forfiles/) | [Indirect Command Execution](/tags/#indirect-command-execution) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Windows Indirect Command Execution Via pcalua](/endpoint/windows_indirect_command_execution_via_pcalua/) | [Indirect Command Execution](/tags/#indirect-command-execution) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Windows InstallUtil Credential Theft](/endpoint/windows_installutil_credential_theft/) | [InstallUtil](/tags/#installutil), [Signed Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#signed-binary-proxy-execution) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Windows InstallUtil Remote Network Connection](/endpoint/windows_installutil_remote_network_connection/) | [InstallUtil](/tags/#installutil), [Signed Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#signed-binary-proxy-execution) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Windows InstallUtil URL in Command Line](/endpoint/windows_installutil_url_in_command_line/) | [InstallUtil](/tags/#installutil), [Signed Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#signed-binary-proxy-execution) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Windows InstallUtil Uninstall Option](/endpoint/windows_installutil_uninstall_option/) | [InstallUtil](/tags/#installutil), [Signed Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#signed-binary-proxy-execution) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Windows InstallUtil Uninstall Option with Network](/endpoint/windows_installutil_uninstall_option_with_network/) | [InstallUtil](/tags/#installutil), [Signed Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#signed-binary-proxy-execution) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Windows InstallUtil in Non Standard Path](/endpoint/windows_installutil_in_non_standard_path/) | [Masquerading](/tags/#masquerading), [Rename System Utilities](/tags/#rename-system-utilities), [Signed Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#signed-binary-proxy-execution), [InstallUtil](/tags/#installutil) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Windows InstallUtil Credential Theft](/endpoint/windows_installutil_credential_theft/) | [InstallUtil](/tags/#installutil), [System Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#system-binary-proxy-execution) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Windows InstallUtil Remote Network Connection](/endpoint/windows_installutil_remote_network_connection/) | [InstallUtil](/tags/#installutil), [System Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#system-binary-proxy-execution) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Windows InstallUtil URL in Command Line](/endpoint/windows_installutil_url_in_command_line/) | [InstallUtil](/tags/#installutil), [System Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#system-binary-proxy-execution) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Windows InstallUtil Uninstall Option](/endpoint/windows_installutil_uninstall_option/) | [InstallUtil](/tags/#installutil), [System Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#system-binary-proxy-execution) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Windows InstallUtil Uninstall Option with Network](/endpoint/windows_installutil_uninstall_option_with_network/) | [InstallUtil](/tags/#installutil), [System Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#system-binary-proxy-execution) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Windows InstallUtil in Non Standard Path](/endpoint/windows_installutil_in_non_standard_path/) | [Masquerading](/tags/#masquerading), [Rename System Utilities](/tags/#rename-system-utilities), [System Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#system-binary-proxy-execution), [InstallUtil](/tags/#installutil) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Windows Invalid Users Failed Authentication via Kerberos](/endpoint/windows_invalid_users_failed_authentication_via_kerberos/) | [Password Spraying](/tags/#password-spraying), [Brute Force](/tags/#brute-force) | [Anomaly](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Windows Java Spawning Shells](/endpoint/windows_java_spawning_shells/) | [Exploit Public-Facing Application](/tags/#exploit-public-facing-application) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Windows Kerberos Local Successful Logon](/endpoint/windows_kerberos_local_successful_logon/) | [Steal or Forge Kerberos Tickets](/tags/#steal-or-forge-kerberos-tickets) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
@@ -854,13 +868,14 @@ sidebar:
|
||||
| [Windows NirSoft AdvancedRun](/endpoint/windows_nirsoft_advancedrun/) | [Tool](/tags/#tool) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Windows NirSoft Utilities](/endpoint/windows_nirsoft_utilities/) | [Tool](/tags/#tool) | [Hunting](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Windows Non-System Account Targeting Lsass](/endpoint/windows_non-system_account_targeting_lsass/) | [LSASS Memory](/tags/#lsass-memory), [OS Credential Dumping](/tags/#os-credential-dumping) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Windows Office Product Spawning MSDT](/endpoint/windows_office_product_spawning_msdt/) | [Phishing](/tags/#phishing), [Spearphishing Attachment](/tags/#spearphishing-attachment) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Windows Possible Credential Dumping](/endpoint/windows_possible_credential_dumping/) | [LSASS Memory](/tags/#lsass-memory), [OS Credential Dumping](/tags/#os-credential-dumping) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Windows PowerView Constrained Delegation Discovery](/endpoint/windows_powerview_constrained_delegation_discovery/) | [Remote System Discovery](/tags/#remote-system-discovery) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Windows PowerView Unconstrained Delegation Discovery](/endpoint/windows_powerview_unconstrained_delegation_discovery/) | [Remote System Discovery](/tags/#remote-system-discovery) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Windows Process With NamedPipe CommandLine](/endpoint/windows_process_with_namedpipe_commandline/) | [Process Injection](/tags/#process-injection) | [Anomaly](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Windows Processes Killed By Industroyer2 Malware](/endpoint/windows_processes_killed_by_industroyer2_malware/) | [Service Stop](/tags/#service-stop) | [Anomaly](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Windows Raccine Scheduled Task Deletion](/endpoint/windows_raccine_scheduled_task_deletion/) | [Disable or Modify Tools](/tags/#disable-or-modify-tools) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Windows Rasautou DLL Execution](/endpoint/windows_rasautou_dll_execution/) | [Dynamic-link Library Injection](/tags/#dynamic-link-library-injection), [Signed Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#signed-binary-proxy-execution), [Process Injection](/tags/#process-injection) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Windows Rasautou DLL Execution](/endpoint/windows_rasautou_dll_execution/) | [Dynamic-link Library Injection](/tags/#dynamic-link-library-injection), [System Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#system-binary-proxy-execution), [Process Injection](/tags/#process-injection) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Windows Raw Access To Disk Volume Partition](/endpoint/windows_raw_access_to_disk_volume_partition/) | [Disk Structure Wipe](/tags/#disk-structure-wipe), [Disk Wipe](/tags/#disk-wipe) | [Anomaly](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Windows Raw Access To Master Boot Record Drive](/endpoint/windows_raw_access_to_master_boot_record_drive/) | [Disk Structure Wipe](/tags/#disk-structure-wipe), [Disk Wipe](/tags/#disk-wipe) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
| [Windows Registry Certificate Added](/endpoint/windows_registry_certificate_added/) | [Install Root Certificate](/tags/#install-root-certificate), [Subvert Trust Controls](/tags/#subvert-trust-controls) | [TTP](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/wiki/Detection-Analytic-Types) |
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
title: Splunk_Audit
|
||||
layout: tag
|
||||
author_profile: false
|
||||
taxonomy: Splunk_Audit
|
||||
permalink: /detections/splunk_audit/
|
||||
sidebar:
|
||||
nav: "detections"
|
||||
---
|
||||
+50
-48
@@ -14,42 +14,43 @@ sidebar:
|
||||
| [AWS Cryptomining](aws_cryptomining) | [Cloud Accounts](/tags/#cloud-accounts), [Unused/Unsupported Cloud Regions](/tags/#unused/unsupported-cloud-regions) | [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion), [Initial Access](/tags/#initial-access), [Persistence](/tags/#persistence), [Privilege Escalation](/tags/#privilege-escalation) |
|
||||
| [AWS IAM Privilege Escalation](aws_iam_privilege_escalation) | [Cloud Accounts](/tags/#cloud-accounts), [Valid Accounts](/tags/#valid-accounts), [Cloud Account](/tags/#cloud-account), [Create Account](/tags/#create-account), [Cloud Infrastructure Discovery](/tags/#cloud-infrastructure-discovery), [Brute Force](/tags/#brute-force), [Account Manipulation](/tags/#account-manipulation), [Cloud Groups](/tags/#cloud-groups), [Permission Groups Discovery](/tags/#permission-groups-discovery) | [Credential Access](/tags/#credential-access), [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion), [Discovery](/tags/#discovery), [Initial Access](/tags/#initial-access), [Persistence](/tags/#persistence), [Privilege Escalation](/tags/#privilege-escalation) |
|
||||
| [AWS Network ACL Activity](aws_network_acl_activity) | [Disable or Modify Cloud Firewall](/tags/#disable-or-modify-cloud-firewall), [Impair Defenses](/tags/#impair-defenses) | [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion) |
|
||||
| [AWS Security Hub Alerts]() | None | None |
|
||||
| [AWS Security Hub Alerts](aws_security_hub_alerts) | None | None |
|
||||
| [AWS Suspicious Provisioning Activities](aws_suspicious_provisioning_activities) | [Unused/Unsupported Cloud Regions](/tags/#unused/unsupported-cloud-regions) | [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion) |
|
||||
| [AWS User Monitoring](aws_user_monitoring) | [Cloud Service Discovery](/tags/#cloud-service-discovery), [Cloud Accounts](/tags/#cloud-accounts) | [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion), [Discovery](/tags/#discovery), [Initial Access](/tags/#initial-access), [Persistence](/tags/#persistence), [Privilege Escalation](/tags/#privilege-escalation) |
|
||||
| [AcidRain](acidrain) | [Data Destruction](/tags/#data-destruction), [File Deletion](/tags/#file-deletion), [Indicator Removal on Host](/tags/#indicator-removal-on-host) | [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion), [Impact](/tags/#impact) |
|
||||
| [Active Directory Discovery](active_directory_discovery) | [Domain Account](/tags/#domain-account), [Account Discovery](/tags/#account-discovery), [Remote System Discovery](/tags/#remote-system-discovery), [Permission Groups Discovery](/tags/#permission-groups-discovery), [Domain Groups](/tags/#domain-groups), [Domain Trust Discovery](/tags/#domain-trust-discovery), [Password Policy Discovery](/tags/#password-policy-discovery), [Local Groups](/tags/#local-groups), [System Owner/User Discovery](/tags/#system-owner/user-discovery), [Local Account](/tags/#local-account), [System Network Connections Discovery](/tags/#system-network-connections-discovery), [System Network Configuration Discovery](/tags/#system-network-configuration-discovery), [Internet Connection Discovery](/tags/#internet-connection-discovery), [Kerberoasting](/tags/#kerberoasting), [Scheduled Task/Job](/tags/#scheduled-task/job) | [Credential Access](/tags/#credential-access), [Discovery](/tags/#discovery), [Execution](/tags/#execution), [Persistence](/tags/#persistence), [Privilege Escalation](/tags/#privilege-escalation) |
|
||||
| [Active Directory Kerberos Attacks](active_directory_kerberos_attacks) | [Steal or Forge Kerberos Tickets](/tags/#steal-or-forge-kerberos-tickets), [AS-REP Roasting](/tags/#as-rep-roasting), [Kerberoasting](/tags/#kerberoasting), [Golden Ticket](/tags/#golden-ticket), [Use Alternate Authentication Material](/tags/#use-alternate-authentication-material), [Gather Victim Identity Information](/tags/#gather-victim-identity-information), [Email Addresses](/tags/#email-addresses), [Pass the Ticket](/tags/#pass-the-ticket), [Password Spraying](/tags/#password-spraying), [Brute Force](/tags/#brute-force), [OS Credential Dumping](/tags/#os-credential-dumping), [Valid Accounts](/tags/#valid-accounts), [Domain Accounts](/tags/#domain-accounts), [Remote System Discovery](/tags/#remote-system-discovery) | [Credential Access](/tags/#credential-access), [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion), [Discovery](/tags/#discovery), [Initial Access](/tags/#initial-access), [Lateral Movement](/tags/#lateral-movement), [Persistence](/tags/#persistence), [Privilege Escalation](/tags/#privilege-escalation), [Reconnaissance](/tags/#reconnaissance) |
|
||||
| [Active Directory Lateral Movement](active_directory_lateral_movement) | [Use Alternate Authentication Material](/tags/#use-alternate-authentication-material), [Pass the Hash](/tags/#pass-the-hash), [Remote Services](/tags/#remote-services), [SMB/Windows Admin Shares](/tags/#smb/windows-admin-shares), [System Services](/tags/#system-services), [Service Execution](/tags/#service-execution), [Distributed Component Object Model](/tags/#distributed-component-object-model), [Windows Management Instrumentation](/tags/#windows-management-instrumentation), [Windows Service](/tags/#windows-service), [Windows Remote Management](/tags/#windows-remote-management), [Scheduled Task](/tags/#scheduled-task), [PowerShell](/tags/#powershell), [Scheduled Task/Job](/tags/#scheduled-task/job), [At (Windows)](/tags/#at-(windows)), [Create or Modify System Process](/tags/#create-or-modify-system-process), [Services Registry Permissions Weakness](/tags/#services-registry-permissions-weakness), [Remote Desktop Protocol](/tags/#remote-desktop-protocol), [Valid Accounts](/tags/#valid-accounts) | [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion), [Execution](/tags/#execution), [Initial Access](/tags/#initial-access), [Lateral Movement](/tags/#lateral-movement), [Persistence](/tags/#persistence), [Privilege Escalation](/tags/#privilege-escalation) |
|
||||
| [Active Directory Lateral Movement](active_directory_lateral_movement) | [Use Alternate Authentication Material](/tags/#use-alternate-authentication-material), [Pass the Hash](/tags/#pass-the-hash), [Remote Services](/tags/#remote-services), [SMB/Windows Admin Shares](/tags/#smb/windows-admin-shares), [System Services](/tags/#system-services), [Service Execution](/tags/#service-execution), [Distributed Component Object Model](/tags/#distributed-component-object-model), [Windows Management Instrumentation](/tags/#windows-management-instrumentation), [Windows Service](/tags/#windows-service), [Windows Remote Management](/tags/#windows-remote-management), [Scheduled Task](/tags/#scheduled-task), [PowerShell](/tags/#powershell), [Scheduled Task/Job](/tags/#scheduled-task/job), [At](/tags/#at), [Create or Modify System Process](/tags/#create-or-modify-system-process), [Services Registry Permissions Weakness](/tags/#services-registry-permissions-weakness), [Remote Desktop Protocol](/tags/#remote-desktop-protocol), [Valid Accounts](/tags/#valid-accounts) | [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion), [Execution](/tags/#execution), [Initial Access](/tags/#initial-access), [Lateral Movement](/tags/#lateral-movement), [Persistence](/tags/#persistence), [Privilege Escalation](/tags/#privilege-escalation) |
|
||||
| [Active Directory Password Spraying](active_directory_password_spraying) | [Password Spraying](/tags/#password-spraying), [Brute Force](/tags/#brute-force) | [Credential Access](/tags/#credential-access) |
|
||||
| [Apache Struts Vulnerability](apache_struts_vulnerability) | [System Information Discovery](/tags/#system-information-discovery) | [Discovery](/tags/#discovery) |
|
||||
| [Asset Tracking]() | None | None |
|
||||
| [Asset Tracking](asset_tracking) | None | None |
|
||||
| [Atlassian Confluence Server and Data Center CVE-2022-26134](atlassian_confluence_server_and_data_center_cve-2022-26134) | [Exploit Public-Facing Application](/tags/#exploit-public-facing-application), [Server Software Component](/tags/#server-software-component) | [Initial Access](/tags/#initial-access), [Persistence](/tags/#persistence) |
|
||||
| [BITS Jobs](bits_jobs) | [BITS Jobs](/tags/#bits-jobs), [Ingress Tool Transfer](/tags/#ingress-tool-transfer) | [Command And Control](/tags/#command-and-control), [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion), [Persistence](/tags/#persistence) |
|
||||
| [Baron Samedit CVE-2021-3156](baron_samedit_cve-2021-3156) | [Exploitation for Privilege Escalation](/tags/#exploitation-for-privilege-escalation) | [Privilege Escalation](/tags/#privilege-escalation) |
|
||||
| [BlackMatter Ransomware](blackmatter_ransomware) | [Credentials in Registry](/tags/#credentials-in-registry), [Unsecured Credentials](/tags/#unsecured-credentials), [Inhibit System Recovery](/tags/#inhibit-system-recovery), [Defacement](/tags/#defacement), [Data Encrypted for Impact](/tags/#data-encrypted-for-impact) | [Credential Access](/tags/#credential-access), [Impact](/tags/#impact) |
|
||||
| [Brand Monitoring]() | None | None |
|
||||
| [Brand Monitoring](brand_monitoring) | None | None |
|
||||
| [Caddy Wiper](caddy_wiper) | [Disk Structure Wipe](/tags/#disk-structure-wipe), [Disk Wipe](/tags/#disk-wipe) | [Impact](/tags/#impact) |
|
||||
| [Clop Ransomware](clop_ransomware) | [User Execution](/tags/#user-execution), [Create or Modify System Process](/tags/#create-or-modify-system-process), [Data Destruction](/tags/#data-destruction), [Inhibit System Recovery](/tags/#inhibit-system-recovery), [Data Encrypted for Impact](/tags/#data-encrypted-for-impact), [Indicator Removal on Host](/tags/#indicator-removal-on-host), [Clear Windows Event Logs](/tags/#clear-windows-event-logs), [System Services](/tags/#system-services), [Service Execution](/tags/#service-execution) | [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion), [Execution](/tags/#execution), [Impact](/tags/#impact), [Persistence](/tags/#persistence), [Privilege Escalation](/tags/#privilege-escalation) |
|
||||
| [Cloud Cryptomining](cloud_cryptomining) | [Cloud Accounts](/tags/#cloud-accounts), [Valid Accounts](/tags/#valid-accounts), [Unused/Unsupported Cloud Regions](/tags/#unused/unsupported-cloud-regions) | [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion), [Initial Access](/tags/#initial-access), [Persistence](/tags/#persistence), [Privilege Escalation](/tags/#privilege-escalation) |
|
||||
| [Cloud Federated Credential Abuse](cloud_federated_credential_abuse) | [Valid Accounts](/tags/#valid-accounts), [Cloud Account](/tags/#cloud-account), [Create Account](/tags/#create-account), [Modify Authentication Process](/tags/#modify-authentication-process), [LSASS Memory](/tags/#lsass-memory), [OS Credential Dumping](/tags/#os-credential-dumping), [Image File Execution Options Injection](/tags/#image-file-execution-options-injection), [Event Triggered Execution](/tags/#event-triggered-execution) | [Credential Access](/tags/#credential-access), [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion), [Initial Access](/tags/#initial-access), [Persistence](/tags/#persistence), [Privilege Escalation](/tags/#privilege-escalation) |
|
||||
| [Cobalt Strike](cobalt_strike) | [Archive via Utility](/tags/#archive-via-utility), [Archive Collected Data](/tags/#archive-collected-data), [Command and Scripting Interpreter](/tags/#command-and-scripting-interpreter), [Windows Command Shell](/tags/#windows-command-shell), [Windows Service](/tags/#windows-service), [Create or Modify System Process](/tags/#create-or-modify-system-process), [Process Injection](/tags/#process-injection), [Signed Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#signed-binary-proxy-execution), [Regsvr32](/tags/#regsvr32), [Rundll32](/tags/#rundll32), [Abuse Elevation Control Mechanism](/tags/#abuse-elevation-control-mechanism), [Masquerading](/tags/#masquerading), [Trusted Developer Utilities Proxy Execution](/tags/#trusted-developer-utilities-proxy-execution), [Rename System Utilities](/tags/#rename-system-utilities), [MSBuild](/tags/#msbuild) | [Collection](/tags/#collection), [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion), [Execution](/tags/#execution), [Persistence](/tags/#persistence), [Privilege Escalation](/tags/#privilege-escalation) |
|
||||
| [ColdRoot MacOS RAT]() | None | None |
|
||||
| [Cobalt Strike](cobalt_strike) | [Archive via Utility](/tags/#archive-via-utility), [Archive Collected Data](/tags/#archive-collected-data), [Command and Scripting Interpreter](/tags/#command-and-scripting-interpreter), [Windows Command Shell](/tags/#windows-command-shell), [Windows Service](/tags/#windows-service), [Create or Modify System Process](/tags/#create-or-modify-system-process), [Process Injection](/tags/#process-injection), [System Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#system-binary-proxy-execution), [Regsvr32](/tags/#regsvr32), [Rundll32](/tags/#rundll32), [Abuse Elevation Control Mechanism](/tags/#abuse-elevation-control-mechanism), [Masquerading](/tags/#masquerading), [Trusted Developer Utilities Proxy Execution](/tags/#trusted-developer-utilities-proxy-execution), [Rename System Utilities](/tags/#rename-system-utilities), [MSBuild](/tags/#msbuild) | [Collection](/tags/#collection), [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion), [Execution](/tags/#execution), [Persistence](/tags/#persistence), [Privilege Escalation](/tags/#privilege-escalation) |
|
||||
| [ColdRoot MacOS RAT](coldroot_macos_rat) | None | None |
|
||||
| [Collection and Staging](collection_and_staging) | [Masquerading](/tags/#masquerading), [Archive via Utility](/tags/#archive-via-utility), [Archive Collected Data](/tags/#archive-collected-data), [Email Collection](/tags/#email-collection), [Local Email Collection](/tags/#local-email-collection), [Remote Email Collection](/tags/#remote-email-collection) | [Collection](/tags/#collection), [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion) |
|
||||
| [Command and Control](command_and_control) | [Exfiltration Over Unencrypted/Obfuscated Non-C2 Protocol](/tags/#exfiltration-over-unencrypted/obfuscated-non-c2-protocol), [DNS](/tags/#dns), [Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol](/tags/#exfiltration-over-alternative-protocol), [Non-Application Layer Protocol](/tags/#non-application-layer-protocol), [Application Layer Protocol](/tags/#application-layer-protocol), [Web Protocols](/tags/#web-protocols), [Drive-by Compromise](/tags/#drive-by-compromise) | [Command And Control](/tags/#command-and-control), [Exfiltration](/tags/#exfiltration), [Initial Access](/tags/#initial-access) |
|
||||
| [Command and Control](command_and_control) | [Exfiltration Over Unencrypted Non-C2 Protocol](/tags/#exfiltration-over-unencrypted-non-c2-protocol), [DNS](/tags/#dns), [Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol](/tags/#exfiltration-over-alternative-protocol), [Non-Application Layer Protocol](/tags/#non-application-layer-protocol), [Application Layer Protocol](/tags/#application-layer-protocol), [Web Protocols](/tags/#web-protocols), [Drive-by Compromise](/tags/#drive-by-compromise) | [Command And Control](/tags/#command-and-control), [Exfiltration](/tags/#exfiltration), [Initial Access](/tags/#initial-access) |
|
||||
| [Common Phishing Frameworks](common_phishing_frameworks) | [Spearphishing via Service](/tags/#spearphishing-via-service) | [Initial Access](/tags/#initial-access) |
|
||||
| [Container Implantation Monitoring and Investigation](container_implantation_monitoring_and_investigation) | [Implant Internal Image](/tags/#implant-internal-image) | [Persistence](/tags/#persistence) |
|
||||
| [Credential Dumping](credential_dumping) | [LSASS Memory](/tags/#lsass-memory), [OS Credential Dumping](/tags/#os-credential-dumping), [Security Account Manager](/tags/#security-account-manager), [NTDS](/tags/#ntds), [Modify Registry](/tags/#modify-registry), [Command and Scripting Interpreter](/tags/#command-and-scripting-interpreter), [PowerShell](/tags/#powershell) | [Credential Access](/tags/#credential-access), [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion), [Execution](/tags/#execution) |
|
||||
| [CyclopsBLink](cyclopsblink) | [Disable or Modify System Firewall](/tags/#disable-or-modify-system-firewall), [Impair Defenses](/tags/#impair-defenses), [Masquerade Task or Service](/tags/#masquerade-task-or-service), [Masquerading](/tags/#masquerading) | [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion) |
|
||||
| [DHS Report TA18-074A](dhs_report_ta18-074a) | [PowerShell](/tags/#powershell), [Windows Command Shell](/tags/#windows-command-shell), [Local Account](/tags/#local-account), [Create Account](/tags/#create-account), [Remote Services](/tags/#remote-services), [SMB/Windows Admin Shares](/tags/#smb/windows-admin-shares), [System Services](/tags/#system-services), [Service Execution](/tags/#service-execution), [Command and Scripting Interpreter](/tags/#command-and-scripting-interpreter), [Disable or Modify System Firewall](/tags/#disable-or-modify-system-firewall), [Impair Defenses](/tags/#impair-defenses), [Registry Run Keys / Startup Folder](/tags/#registry-run-keys-/-startup-folder), [Boot or Logon Autostart Execution](/tags/#boot-or-logon-autostart-execution), [Windows Service](/tags/#windows-service), [Create or Modify System Process](/tags/#create-or-modify-system-process), [Scheduled Task](/tags/#scheduled-task), [Scheduled Task/Job](/tags/#scheduled-task/job), [User Execution](/tags/#user-execution), [Malicious File](/tags/#malicious-file), [Modify Registry](/tags/#modify-registry), [File Transfer Protocols](/tags/#file-transfer-protocols), [Application Layer Protocol](/tags/#application-layer-protocol) | [Command And Control](/tags/#command-and-control), [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion), [Execution](/tags/#execution), [Lateral Movement](/tags/#lateral-movement), [Persistence](/tags/#persistence), [Privilege Escalation](/tags/#privilege-escalation) |
|
||||
| [DNS Amplification Attacks](dns_amplification_attacks) | [Network Denial of Service](/tags/#network-denial-of-service), [Reflection Amplification](/tags/#reflection-amplification) | [Impact](/tags/#impact) |
|
||||
| [DNS Hijacking](dns_hijacking) | [Exfiltration Over Unencrypted/Obfuscated Non-C2 Protocol](/tags/#exfiltration-over-unencrypted/obfuscated-non-c2-protocol), [DNS](/tags/#dns), [Drive-by Compromise](/tags/#drive-by-compromise) | [Command And Control](/tags/#command-and-control), [Exfiltration](/tags/#exfiltration), [Initial Access](/tags/#initial-access) |
|
||||
| [DarkSide Ransomware](darkside_ransomware) | [Security Account Manager](/tags/#security-account-manager), [OS Credential Dumping](/tags/#os-credential-dumping), [BITS Jobs](/tags/#bits-jobs), [Ingress Tool Transfer](/tags/#ingress-tool-transfer), [Signed Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#signed-binary-proxy-execution), [CMSTP](/tags/#cmstp), [Process Injection](/tags/#process-injection), [Inhibit System Recovery](/tags/#inhibit-system-recovery), [LSASS Memory](/tags/#lsass-memory), [Remote Services](/tags/#remote-services), [SMB/Windows Admin Shares](/tags/#smb/windows-admin-shares), [Automated Exfiltration](/tags/#automated-exfiltration), [System Services](/tags/#system-services), [Service Execution](/tags/#service-execution), [Data Encrypted for Impact](/tags/#data-encrypted-for-impact), [Bypass User Account Control](/tags/#bypass-user-account-control), [Abuse Elevation Control Mechanism](/tags/#abuse-elevation-control-mechanism) | [Command And Control](/tags/#command-and-control), [Credential Access](/tags/#credential-access), [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion), [Execution](/tags/#execution), [Exfiltration](/tags/#exfiltration), [Impact](/tags/#impact), [Lateral Movement](/tags/#lateral-movement), [Persistence](/tags/#persistence), [Privilege Escalation](/tags/#privilege-escalation) |
|
||||
| [Data Destruction](data_destruction) | [Windows Command Shell](/tags/#windows-command-shell), [Command and Scripting Interpreter](/tags/#command-and-scripting-interpreter), [Remote Services](/tags/#remote-services), [SMB/Windows Admin Shares](/tags/#smb/windows-admin-shares), [Masquerading](/tags/#masquerading), [Data Destruction](/tags/#data-destruction), [File Deletion](/tags/#file-deletion), [Indicator Removal on Host](/tags/#indicator-removal-on-host), [Signed Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#signed-binary-proxy-execution), [Regsvr32](/tags/#regsvr32), [Create or Modify System Process](/tags/#create-or-modify-system-process), [Modify Registry](/tags/#modify-registry), [Disk Structure Wipe](/tags/#disk-structure-wipe), [Disk Wipe](/tags/#disk-wipe) | [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion), [Execution](/tags/#execution), [Impact](/tags/#impact), [Lateral Movement](/tags/#lateral-movement), [Persistence](/tags/#persistence), [Privilege Escalation](/tags/#privilege-escalation) |
|
||||
| [Data Exfiltration](data_exfiltration) | [Transfer Data to Cloud Account](/tags/#transfer-data-to-cloud-account), [Email Collection](/tags/#email-collection), [Email Forwarding Rule](/tags/#email-forwarding-rule), [Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol](/tags/#exfiltration-over-alternative-protocol), [Local Email Collection](/tags/#local-email-collection), [Phishing](/tags/#phishing), [Exfiltration Over C2 Channel](/tags/#exfiltration-over-c2-channel), [Exfiltration Over Unencrypted/Obfuscated Non-C2 Protocol](/tags/#exfiltration-over-unencrypted/obfuscated-non-c2-protocol) | [Collection](/tags/#collection), [Exfiltration](/tags/#exfiltration), [Initial Access](/tags/#initial-access) |
|
||||
| [Data Protection](data_protection) | [Exfiltration Over Unencrypted/Obfuscated Non-C2 Protocol](/tags/#exfiltration-over-unencrypted/obfuscated-non-c2-protocol), [Drive-by Compromise](/tags/#drive-by-compromise) | [Exfiltration](/tags/#exfiltration), [Initial Access](/tags/#initial-access) |
|
||||
| [DNS Hijacking](dns_hijacking) | [Exfiltration Over Unencrypted Non-C2 Protocol](/tags/#exfiltration-over-unencrypted-non-c2-protocol), [DNS](/tags/#dns), [Drive-by Compromise](/tags/#drive-by-compromise) | [Command And Control](/tags/#command-and-control), [Exfiltration](/tags/#exfiltration), [Initial Access](/tags/#initial-access) |
|
||||
| [DarkSide Ransomware](darkside_ransomware) | [Security Account Manager](/tags/#security-account-manager), [OS Credential Dumping](/tags/#os-credential-dumping), [BITS Jobs](/tags/#bits-jobs), [Ingress Tool Transfer](/tags/#ingress-tool-transfer), [System Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#system-binary-proxy-execution), [CMSTP](/tags/#cmstp), [Process Injection](/tags/#process-injection), [Inhibit System Recovery](/tags/#inhibit-system-recovery), [LSASS Memory](/tags/#lsass-memory), [Remote Services](/tags/#remote-services), [SMB/Windows Admin Shares](/tags/#smb/windows-admin-shares), [Automated Exfiltration](/tags/#automated-exfiltration), [System Services](/tags/#system-services), [Service Execution](/tags/#service-execution), [Data Encrypted for Impact](/tags/#data-encrypted-for-impact), [Bypass User Account Control](/tags/#bypass-user-account-control), [Abuse Elevation Control Mechanism](/tags/#abuse-elevation-control-mechanism) | [Command And Control](/tags/#command-and-control), [Credential Access](/tags/#credential-access), [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion), [Execution](/tags/#execution), [Exfiltration](/tags/#exfiltration), [Impact](/tags/#impact), [Lateral Movement](/tags/#lateral-movement), [Persistence](/tags/#persistence), [Privilege Escalation](/tags/#privilege-escalation) |
|
||||
| [Data Destruction](data_destruction) | [Windows Command Shell](/tags/#windows-command-shell), [Command and Scripting Interpreter](/tags/#command-and-scripting-interpreter), [Remote Services](/tags/#remote-services), [SMB/Windows Admin Shares](/tags/#smb/windows-admin-shares), [Masquerading](/tags/#masquerading), [Data Destruction](/tags/#data-destruction), [File Deletion](/tags/#file-deletion), [Indicator Removal on Host](/tags/#indicator-removal-on-host), [System Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#system-binary-proxy-execution), [Regsvr32](/tags/#regsvr32), [Create or Modify System Process](/tags/#create-or-modify-system-process), [Modify Registry](/tags/#modify-registry), [Disk Structure Wipe](/tags/#disk-structure-wipe), [Disk Wipe](/tags/#disk-wipe) | [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion), [Execution](/tags/#execution), [Impact](/tags/#impact), [Lateral Movement](/tags/#lateral-movement), [Persistence](/tags/#persistence), [Privilege Escalation](/tags/#privilege-escalation) |
|
||||
| [Data Exfiltration](data_exfiltration) | [Transfer Data to Cloud Account](/tags/#transfer-data-to-cloud-account), [Email Collection](/tags/#email-collection), [Email Forwarding Rule](/tags/#email-forwarding-rule), [Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol](/tags/#exfiltration-over-alternative-protocol), [Local Email Collection](/tags/#local-email-collection), [Phishing](/tags/#phishing), [Exfiltration Over C2 Channel](/tags/#exfiltration-over-c2-channel), [Exfiltration Over Unencrypted Non-C2 Protocol](/tags/#exfiltration-over-unencrypted-non-c2-protocol) | [Collection](/tags/#collection), [Exfiltration](/tags/#exfiltration), [Initial Access](/tags/#initial-access) |
|
||||
| [Data Protection](data_protection) | [Exfiltration Over Unencrypted Non-C2 Protocol](/tags/#exfiltration-over-unencrypted-non-c2-protocol), [Drive-by Compromise](/tags/#drive-by-compromise) | [Exfiltration](/tags/#exfiltration), [Initial Access](/tags/#initial-access) |
|
||||
| [Deobfuscate-Decode Files or Information](deobfuscate-decode_files_or_information) | [Deobfuscate/Decode Files or Information](/tags/#deobfuscate/decode-files-or-information) | [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion) |
|
||||
| [Detect Zerologon Attack](detect_zerologon_attack) | [LSASS Memory](/tags/#lsass-memory), [OS Credential Dumping](/tags/#os-credential-dumping), [Exploitation of Remote Services](/tags/#exploitation-of-remote-services), [Exploit Public-Facing Application](/tags/#exploit-public-facing-application) | [Credential Access](/tags/#credential-access), [Initial Access](/tags/#initial-access), [Lateral Movement](/tags/#lateral-movement) |
|
||||
| [Dev Sec Ops](dev_sec_ops) | [Malicious Image](/tags/#malicious-image), [User Execution](/tags/#user-execution), [Compromise Client Software Binary](/tags/#compromise-client-software-binary), [Compromise Software Supply Chain](/tags/#compromise-software-supply-chain), [Supply Chain Compromise](/tags/#supply-chain-compromise), [Trusted Relationship](/tags/#trusted-relationship), [Compromise Software Dependencies and Development Tools](/tags/#compromise-software-dependencies-and-development-tools), [Exfiltration to Cloud Storage](/tags/#exfiltration-to-cloud-storage), [Exfiltration Over Web Service](/tags/#exfiltration-over-web-service), [Spearphishing Attachment](/tags/#spearphishing-attachment), [Phishing](/tags/#phishing), [Exfiltration Over Unencrypted/Obfuscated Non-C2 Protocol](/tags/#exfiltration-over-unencrypted/obfuscated-non-c2-protocol), [Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol](/tags/#exfiltration-over-alternative-protocol), [Exploitation for Credential Access](/tags/#exploitation-for-credential-access), [Cloud Service Discovery](/tags/#cloud-service-discovery) | [Credential Access](/tags/#credential-access), [Discovery](/tags/#discovery), [Execution](/tags/#execution), [Exfiltration](/tags/#exfiltration), [Initial Access](/tags/#initial-access), [Persistence](/tags/#persistence) |
|
||||
| [Dev Sec Ops](dev_sec_ops) | [Malicious Image](/tags/#malicious-image), [User Execution](/tags/#user-execution), [Compromise Client Software Binary](/tags/#compromise-client-software-binary), [Compromise Software Supply Chain](/tags/#compromise-software-supply-chain), [Supply Chain Compromise](/tags/#supply-chain-compromise), [Trusted Relationship](/tags/#trusted-relationship), [Compromise Software Dependencies and Development Tools](/tags/#compromise-software-dependencies-and-development-tools), [Exfiltration to Cloud Storage](/tags/#exfiltration-to-cloud-storage), [Exfiltration Over Web Service](/tags/#exfiltration-over-web-service), [Spearphishing Attachment](/tags/#spearphishing-attachment), [Phishing](/tags/#phishing), [Exfiltration Over Unencrypted Non-C2 Protocol](/tags/#exfiltration-over-unencrypted-non-c2-protocol), [Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol](/tags/#exfiltration-over-alternative-protocol), [Exploitation for Credential Access](/tags/#exploitation-for-credential-access), [Cloud Service Discovery](/tags/#cloud-service-discovery) | [Credential Access](/tags/#credential-access), [Discovery](/tags/#discovery), [Execution](/tags/#execution), [Exfiltration](/tags/#exfiltration), [Initial Access](/tags/#initial-access), [Persistence](/tags/#persistence) |
|
||||
| [Disabling Security Tools](disabling_security_tools) | [Install Root Certificate](/tags/#install-root-certificate), [Subvert Trust Controls](/tags/#subvert-trust-controls), [Disable or Modify Tools](/tags/#disable-or-modify-tools), [Impair Defenses](/tags/#impair-defenses), [Disable or Modify System Firewall](/tags/#disable-or-modify-system-firewall), [Windows Service](/tags/#windows-service), [Create or Modify System Process](/tags/#create-or-modify-system-process), [Modify Registry](/tags/#modify-registry) | [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion), [Persistence](/tags/#persistence), [Privilege Escalation](/tags/#privilege-escalation) |
|
||||
| [Domain Trust Discovery](domain_trust_discovery) | [Domain Trust Discovery](/tags/#domain-trust-discovery), [Remote System Discovery](/tags/#remote-system-discovery) | [Discovery](/tags/#discovery) |
|
||||
| [Double Zero Destructor](double_zero_destructor) | [Masquerading](/tags/#masquerading), [Create or Modify System Process](/tags/#create-or-modify-system-process), [Modify Registry](/tags/#modify-registry), [Disable or Modify Tools](/tags/#disable-or-modify-tools), [Impair Defenses](/tags/#impair-defenses) | [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion), [Persistence](/tags/#persistence), [Privilege Escalation](/tags/#privilege-escalation) |
|
||||
@@ -60,87 +61,88 @@ sidebar:
|
||||
| [FIN7](fin7) | [System Owner/User Discovery](/tags/#system-owner/user-discovery), [Command and Scripting Interpreter](/tags/#command-and-scripting-interpreter), [JavaScript](/tags/#javascript), [Credentials from Password Stores](/tags/#credentials-from-password-stores), [Credentials from Web Browsers](/tags/#credentials-from-web-browsers), [Phishing](/tags/#phishing), [Spearphishing Attachment](/tags/#spearphishing-attachment), [Visual Basic](/tags/#visual-basic), [Process Injection](/tags/#process-injection), [Create or Modify System Process](/tags/#create-or-modify-system-process), [Parent PID Spoofing](/tags/#parent-pid-spoofing), [Access Token Manipulation](/tags/#access-token-manipulation), [XSL Script Processing](/tags/#xsl-script-processing) | [Credential Access](/tags/#credential-access), [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion), [Discovery](/tags/#discovery), [Execution](/tags/#execution), [Initial Access](/tags/#initial-access), [Persistence](/tags/#persistence), [Privilege Escalation](/tags/#privilege-escalation) |
|
||||
| [GCP Cross Account Activity](gcp_cross_account_activity) | [Valid Accounts](/tags/#valid-accounts) | [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion), [Initial Access](/tags/#initial-access), [Persistence](/tags/#persistence), [Privilege Escalation](/tags/#privilege-escalation) |
|
||||
| [HAFNIUM Group](hafnium_group) | [LSASS Memory](/tags/#lsass-memory), [Command and Scripting Interpreter](/tags/#command-and-scripting-interpreter), [PowerShell](/tags/#powershell), [Ingress Tool Transfer](/tags/#ingress-tool-transfer), [Server Software Component](/tags/#server-software-component), [Web Shell](/tags/#web-shell), [Exploit Public-Facing Application](/tags/#exploit-public-facing-application), [Local Account](/tags/#local-account), [Create Account](/tags/#create-account), [Remote Services](/tags/#remote-services), [SMB/Windows Admin Shares](/tags/#smb/windows-admin-shares), [System Services](/tags/#system-services), [Service Execution](/tags/#service-execution), [OS Credential Dumping](/tags/#os-credential-dumping), [NTDS](/tags/#ntds), [Email Collection](/tags/#email-collection), [Remote Email Collection](/tags/#remote-email-collection) | [Collection](/tags/#collection), [Command And Control](/tags/#command-and-control), [Credential Access](/tags/#credential-access), [Execution](/tags/#execution), [Initial Access](/tags/#initial-access), [Lateral Movement](/tags/#lateral-movement), [Persistence](/tags/#persistence) |
|
||||
| [Hermetic Wiper](hermetic_wiper) | [PowerShell](/tags/#powershell), [Malicious File](/tags/#malicious-file), [Active Setup](/tags/#active-setup), [Boot or Logon Autostart Execution](/tags/#boot-or-logon-autostart-execution), [Command and Scripting Interpreter](/tags/#command-and-scripting-interpreter), [Ingress Tool Transfer](/tags/#ingress-tool-transfer), [Change Default File Association](/tags/#change-default-file-association), [Event Triggered Execution](/tags/#event-triggered-execution), [Windows Command Shell](/tags/#windows-command-shell), [OS Credential Dumping](/tags/#os-credential-dumping), [Indicator Blocking](/tags/#indicator-blocking), [Trusted Developer Utilities Proxy Execution](/tags/#trusted-developer-utilities-proxy-execution), [Impair Defenses](/tags/#impair-defenses), [Remote Services](/tags/#remote-services), [SMB/Windows Admin Shares](/tags/#smb/windows-admin-shares), [Masquerading](/tags/#masquerading), [Steal or Forge Kerberos Tickets](/tags/#steal-or-forge-kerberos-tickets), [Kerberoasting](/tags/#kerberoasting), [Exploit Public-Facing Application](/tags/#exploit-public-facing-application), [Boot or Logon Initialization Scripts](/tags/#boot-or-logon-initialization-scripts), [Logon Script (Windows)](/tags/#logon-script-(windows)), [Obfuscated Files or Information](/tags/#obfuscated-files-or-information), [DLL Side-Loading](/tags/#dll-side-loading), [Hijack Execution Flow](/tags/#hijack-execution-flow), [Accessibility Features](/tags/#accessibility-features), [Distributed Component Object Model](/tags/#distributed-component-object-model), [Windows Remote Management](/tags/#windows-remote-management), [Windows Management Instrumentation](/tags/#windows-management-instrumentation), [Scheduled Task](/tags/#scheduled-task), [Windows Service](/tags/#windows-service), [Indicator Removal from Tools](/tags/#indicator-removal-from-tools), [Component Object Model Hijacking](/tags/#component-object-model-hijacking), [Process Injection](/tags/#process-injection), [Gather Victim Host Information](/tags/#gather-victim-host-information), [Image File Execution Options Injection](/tags/#image-file-execution-options-injection), [Signed Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#signed-binary-proxy-execution), [Regsvr32](/tags/#regsvr32), [Access Token Manipulation](/tags/#access-token-manipulation), [Token Impersonation/Theft](/tags/#token-impersonation/theft), [Screensaver](/tags/#screensaver), [Create or Modify System Process](/tags/#create-or-modify-system-process), [Time Providers](/tags/#time-providers), [Server Software Component](/tags/#server-software-component), [Web Shell](/tags/#web-shell), [Data Destruction](/tags/#data-destruction), [Modify Registry](/tags/#modify-registry), [Disk Structure Wipe](/tags/#disk-structure-wipe), [Disk Wipe](/tags/#disk-wipe), [Spearphishing Attachment](/tags/#spearphishing-attachment), [Phishing](/tags/#phishing), [Exploitation for Privilege Escalation](/tags/#exploitation-for-privilege-escalation), [Print Processors](/tags/#print-processors) | [Command And Control](/tags/#command-and-control), [Credential Access](/tags/#credential-access), [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion), [Execution](/tags/#execution), [Impact](/tags/#impact), [Initial Access](/tags/#initial-access), [Lateral Movement](/tags/#lateral-movement), [Persistence](/tags/#persistence), [Privilege Escalation](/tags/#privilege-escalation), [Reconnaissance](/tags/#reconnaissance) |
|
||||
| [Hidden Cobra Malware](hidden_cobra_malware) | [PowerShell](/tags/#powershell), [Windows Command Shell](/tags/#windows-command-shell), [Indicator Removal on Host](/tags/#indicator-removal-on-host), [Network Share Connection Removal](/tags/#network-share-connection-removal), [Remote Desktop Protocol](/tags/#remote-desktop-protocol), [Remote Services](/tags/#remote-services), [File Transfer Protocols](/tags/#file-transfer-protocols), [Application Layer Protocol](/tags/#application-layer-protocol), [DNS](/tags/#dns), [SMB/Windows Admin Shares](/tags/#smb/windows-admin-shares), [Exfiltration Over Unencrypted/Obfuscated Non-C2 Protocol](/tags/#exfiltration-over-unencrypted/obfuscated-non-c2-protocol), [Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol](/tags/#exfiltration-over-alternative-protocol) | [Command And Control](/tags/#command-and-control), [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion), [Execution](/tags/#execution), [Exfiltration](/tags/#exfiltration), [Lateral Movement](/tags/#lateral-movement) |
|
||||
| [Host Redirection](host_redirection) | [Exfiltration Over Unencrypted/Obfuscated Non-C2 Protocol](/tags/#exfiltration-over-unencrypted/obfuscated-non-c2-protocol), [DNS](/tags/#dns) | [Command And Control](/tags/#command-and-control), [Exfiltration](/tags/#exfiltration) |
|
||||
| [IcedID](icedid) | [Domain Account](/tags/#domain-account), [Account Discovery](/tags/#account-discovery), [Command and Scripting Interpreter](/tags/#command-and-scripting-interpreter), [Windows Command Shell](/tags/#windows-command-shell), [Process Injection](/tags/#process-injection), [Disable or Modify Tools](/tags/#disable-or-modify-tools), [Impair Defenses](/tags/#impair-defenses), [User Execution](/tags/#user-execution), [Malicious File](/tags/#malicious-file), [Bypass User Account Control](/tags/#bypass-user-account-control), [Abuse Elevation Control Mechanism](/tags/#abuse-elevation-control-mechanism), [Modify Registry](/tags/#modify-registry), [Archive via Utility](/tags/#archive-via-utility), [Archive Collected Data](/tags/#archive-collected-data), [Signed Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#signed-binary-proxy-execution), [Mshta](/tags/#mshta), [Domain Trust Discovery](/tags/#domain-trust-discovery), [Phishing](/tags/#phishing), [Spearphishing Attachment](/tags/#spearphishing-attachment), [Registry Run Keys / Startup Folder](/tags/#registry-run-keys-/-startup-folder), [Boot or Logon Autostart Execution](/tags/#boot-or-logon-autostart-execution), [Regsvr32](/tags/#regsvr32), [Rundll32](/tags/#rundll32), [Scheduled Task/Job](/tags/#scheduled-task/job), [Data from Local System](/tags/#data-from-local-system), [Scheduled Task](/tags/#scheduled-task) | [Collection](/tags/#collection), [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion), [Discovery](/tags/#discovery), [Execution](/tags/#execution), [Initial Access](/tags/#initial-access), [Persistence](/tags/#persistence), [Privilege Escalation](/tags/#privilege-escalation) |
|
||||
| [Hermetic Wiper](hermetic_wiper) | [PowerShell](/tags/#powershell), [Malicious File](/tags/#malicious-file), [Active Setup](/tags/#active-setup), [Boot or Logon Autostart Execution](/tags/#boot-or-logon-autostart-execution), [Command and Scripting Interpreter](/tags/#command-and-scripting-interpreter), [Ingress Tool Transfer](/tags/#ingress-tool-transfer), [Change Default File Association](/tags/#change-default-file-association), [Event Triggered Execution](/tags/#event-triggered-execution), [Windows Command Shell](/tags/#windows-command-shell), [OS Credential Dumping](/tags/#os-credential-dumping), [Indicator Blocking](/tags/#indicator-blocking), [Trusted Developer Utilities Proxy Execution](/tags/#trusted-developer-utilities-proxy-execution), [Impair Defenses](/tags/#impair-defenses), [Remote Services](/tags/#remote-services), [SMB/Windows Admin Shares](/tags/#smb/windows-admin-shares), [Masquerading](/tags/#masquerading), [Steal or Forge Kerberos Tickets](/tags/#steal-or-forge-kerberos-tickets), [Kerberoasting](/tags/#kerberoasting), [Exploit Public-Facing Application](/tags/#exploit-public-facing-application), [Boot or Logon Initialization Scripts](/tags/#boot-or-logon-initialization-scripts), [Logon Script (Windows)](/tags/#logon-script-(windows)), [Obfuscated Files or Information](/tags/#obfuscated-files-or-information), [DLL Side-Loading](/tags/#dll-side-loading), [Hijack Execution Flow](/tags/#hijack-execution-flow), [Accessibility Features](/tags/#accessibility-features), [Distributed Component Object Model](/tags/#distributed-component-object-model), [Windows Remote Management](/tags/#windows-remote-management), [Windows Management Instrumentation](/tags/#windows-management-instrumentation), [Scheduled Task](/tags/#scheduled-task), [Windows Service](/tags/#windows-service), [Indicator Removal from Tools](/tags/#indicator-removal-from-tools), [Component Object Model Hijacking](/tags/#component-object-model-hijacking), [Process Injection](/tags/#process-injection), [Gather Victim Host Information](/tags/#gather-victim-host-information), [Image File Execution Options Injection](/tags/#image-file-execution-options-injection), [System Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#system-binary-proxy-execution), [Regsvr32](/tags/#regsvr32), [Access Token Manipulation](/tags/#access-token-manipulation), [Token Impersonation/Theft](/tags/#token-impersonation/theft), [Screensaver](/tags/#screensaver), [Create or Modify System Process](/tags/#create-or-modify-system-process), [Time Providers](/tags/#time-providers), [Server Software Component](/tags/#server-software-component), [Web Shell](/tags/#web-shell), [Data Destruction](/tags/#data-destruction), [Modify Registry](/tags/#modify-registry), [Disk Structure Wipe](/tags/#disk-structure-wipe), [Disk Wipe](/tags/#disk-wipe), [Spearphishing Attachment](/tags/#spearphishing-attachment), [Phishing](/tags/#phishing), [Exploitation for Privilege Escalation](/tags/#exploitation-for-privilege-escalation), [Print Processors](/tags/#print-processors) | [Command And Control](/tags/#command-and-control), [Credential Access](/tags/#credential-access), [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion), [Execution](/tags/#execution), [Impact](/tags/#impact), [Initial Access](/tags/#initial-access), [Lateral Movement](/tags/#lateral-movement), [Persistence](/tags/#persistence), [Privilege Escalation](/tags/#privilege-escalation), [Reconnaissance](/tags/#reconnaissance) |
|
||||
| [Hidden Cobra Malware](hidden_cobra_malware) | [PowerShell](/tags/#powershell), [Windows Command Shell](/tags/#windows-command-shell), [Indicator Removal on Host](/tags/#indicator-removal-on-host), [Network Share Connection Removal](/tags/#network-share-connection-removal), [Remote Desktop Protocol](/tags/#remote-desktop-protocol), [Remote Services](/tags/#remote-services), [File Transfer Protocols](/tags/#file-transfer-protocols), [Application Layer Protocol](/tags/#application-layer-protocol), [DNS](/tags/#dns), [SMB/Windows Admin Shares](/tags/#smb/windows-admin-shares), [Exfiltration Over Unencrypted Non-C2 Protocol](/tags/#exfiltration-over-unencrypted-non-c2-protocol), [Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol](/tags/#exfiltration-over-alternative-protocol) | [Command And Control](/tags/#command-and-control), [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion), [Execution](/tags/#execution), [Exfiltration](/tags/#exfiltration), [Lateral Movement](/tags/#lateral-movement) |
|
||||
| [Host Redirection](host_redirection) | [Exfiltration Over Unencrypted Non-C2 Protocol](/tags/#exfiltration-over-unencrypted-non-c2-protocol), [DNS](/tags/#dns) | [Command And Control](/tags/#command-and-control), [Exfiltration](/tags/#exfiltration) |
|
||||
| [IcedID](icedid) | [Domain Account](/tags/#domain-account), [Account Discovery](/tags/#account-discovery), [Command and Scripting Interpreter](/tags/#command-and-scripting-interpreter), [Windows Command Shell](/tags/#windows-command-shell), [Process Injection](/tags/#process-injection), [Disable or Modify Tools](/tags/#disable-or-modify-tools), [Impair Defenses](/tags/#impair-defenses), [User Execution](/tags/#user-execution), [Malicious File](/tags/#malicious-file), [Bypass User Account Control](/tags/#bypass-user-account-control), [Abuse Elevation Control Mechanism](/tags/#abuse-elevation-control-mechanism), [Modify Registry](/tags/#modify-registry), [Archive via Utility](/tags/#archive-via-utility), [Archive Collected Data](/tags/#archive-collected-data), [System Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#system-binary-proxy-execution), [Mshta](/tags/#mshta), [Domain Trust Discovery](/tags/#domain-trust-discovery), [Phishing](/tags/#phishing), [Spearphishing Attachment](/tags/#spearphishing-attachment), [Registry Run Keys / Startup Folder](/tags/#registry-run-keys-/-startup-folder), [Boot or Logon Autostart Execution](/tags/#boot-or-logon-autostart-execution), [Regsvr32](/tags/#regsvr32), [Rundll32](/tags/#rundll32), [Scheduled Task/Job](/tags/#scheduled-task/job), [Data from Local System](/tags/#data-from-local-system), [Scheduled Task](/tags/#scheduled-task) | [Collection](/tags/#collection), [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion), [Discovery](/tags/#discovery), [Execution](/tags/#execution), [Initial Access](/tags/#initial-access), [Persistence](/tags/#persistence), [Privilege Escalation](/tags/#privilege-escalation) |
|
||||
| [Industroyer2](industroyer2) | [Domain Account](/tags/#domain-account), [Account Discovery](/tags/#account-discovery), [Security Account Manager](/tags/#security-account-manager), [OS Credential Dumping](/tags/#os-credential-dumping), [LSASS Memory](/tags/#lsass-memory), [Remote Services](/tags/#remote-services), [SMB/Windows Admin Shares](/tags/#smb/windows-admin-shares), [Masquerading](/tags/#masquerading), [Distributed Component Object Model](/tags/#distributed-component-object-model), [Windows Management Instrumentation](/tags/#windows-management-instrumentation), [Windows Service](/tags/#windows-service), [Cron](/tags/#cron), [Scheduled Task/Job](/tags/#scheduled-task/job), [Data Destruction](/tags/#data-destruction), [Service Stop](/tags/#service-stop), [File Deletion](/tags/#file-deletion), [Indicator Removal on Host](/tags/#indicator-removal-on-host), [System Network Configuration Discovery](/tags/#system-network-configuration-discovery), [Gather Victim Host Information](/tags/#gather-victim-host-information), [Create or Modify System Process](/tags/#create-or-modify-system-process), [Scheduled Task](/tags/#scheduled-task), [Disable or Modify System Firewall](/tags/#disable-or-modify-system-firewall), [Impair Defenses](/tags/#impair-defenses) | [Credential Access](/tags/#credential-access), [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion), [Discovery](/tags/#discovery), [Execution](/tags/#execution), [Impact](/tags/#impact), [Lateral Movement](/tags/#lateral-movement), [Persistence](/tags/#persistence), [Privilege Escalation](/tags/#privilege-escalation), [Reconnaissance](/tags/#reconnaissance) |
|
||||
| [Information Sabotage](information_sabotage) | [Transfer Data to Cloud Account](/tags/#transfer-data-to-cloud-account) | [Exfiltration](/tags/#exfiltration) |
|
||||
| [Ingress Tool Transfer](ingress_tool_transfer) | [Command and Scripting Interpreter](/tags/#command-and-scripting-interpreter), [PowerShell](/tags/#powershell), [Ingress Tool Transfer](/tags/#ingress-tool-transfer), [BITS Jobs](/tags/#bits-jobs) | [Command And Control](/tags/#command-and-control), [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion), [Execution](/tags/#execution), [Persistence](/tags/#persistence) |
|
||||
| [Insider Threat](insider_threat) | [Exfiltration to Cloud Storage](/tags/#exfiltration-to-cloud-storage), [Exfiltration Over Web Service](/tags/#exfiltration-over-web-service), [Exfiltration Over Unencrypted/Obfuscated Non-C2 Protocol](/tags/#exfiltration-over-unencrypted/obfuscated-non-c2-protocol), [Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol](/tags/#exfiltration-over-alternative-protocol), [Transfer Data to Cloud Account](/tags/#transfer-data-to-cloud-account), [Password Spraying](/tags/#password-spraying), [Brute Force](/tags/#brute-force) | [Credential Access](/tags/#credential-access), [Exfiltration](/tags/#exfiltration) |
|
||||
| [Insider Threat](insider_threat) | [Exfiltration to Cloud Storage](/tags/#exfiltration-to-cloud-storage), [Exfiltration Over Web Service](/tags/#exfiltration-over-web-service), [Exfiltration Over Unencrypted Non-C2 Protocol](/tags/#exfiltration-over-unencrypted-non-c2-protocol), [Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol](/tags/#exfiltration-over-alternative-protocol), [Transfer Data to Cloud Account](/tags/#transfer-data-to-cloud-account), [Password Spraying](/tags/#password-spraying), [Brute Force](/tags/#brute-force) | [Credential Access](/tags/#credential-access), [Exfiltration](/tags/#exfiltration) |
|
||||
| [JBoss Vulnerability](jboss_vulnerability) | [System Information Discovery](/tags/#system-information-discovery) | [Discovery](/tags/#discovery) |
|
||||
| [Kubernetes Scanning Activity](kubernetes_scanning_activity) | [Cloud Service Discovery](/tags/#cloud-service-discovery) | [Discovery](/tags/#discovery) |
|
||||
| [Kubernetes Sensitive Object Access Activity]() | None | None |
|
||||
| [Kubernetes Sensitive Role Activity]() | None | None |
|
||||
| [Linux Persistence Techniques](linux_persistence_techniques) | [Cron](/tags/#cron), [Scheduled Task/Job](/tags/#scheduled-task/job), [Local Account](/tags/#local-account), [Create Account](/tags/#create-account), [At (Linux)](/tags/#at-(linux)), [Linux and Mac File and Directory Permissions Modification](/tags/#linux-and-mac-file-and-directory-permissions-modification), [File and Directory Permissions Modification](/tags/#file-and-directory-permissions-modification), [Setuid and Setgid](/tags/#setuid-and-setgid), [Abuse Elevation Control Mechanism](/tags/#abuse-elevation-control-mechanism), [Sudo and Sudo Caching](/tags/#sudo-and-sudo-caching), [Kernel Modules and Extensions](/tags/#kernel-modules-and-extensions), [Boot or Logon Autostart Execution](/tags/#boot-or-logon-autostart-execution), [RC Scripts](/tags/#rc-scripts), [Boot or Logon Initialization Scripts](/tags/#boot-or-logon-initialization-scripts), [Unix Shell Configuration Modification](/tags/#unix-shell-configuration-modification), [Event Triggered Execution](/tags/#event-triggered-execution), [SSH Authorized Keys](/tags/#ssh-authorized-keys), [Account Manipulation](/tags/#account-manipulation), [/etc/passwd and /etc/shadow](/tags/#/etc/passwd-and-/etc/shadow), [OS Credential Dumping](/tags/#os-credential-dumping), [Dynamic Linker Hijacking](/tags/#dynamic-linker-hijacking), [Hijack Execution Flow](/tags/#hijack-execution-flow), [Systemd Timers](/tags/#systemd-timers), [Data Destruction](/tags/#data-destruction) | [Credential Access](/tags/#credential-access), [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion), [Execution](/tags/#execution), [Impact](/tags/#impact), [Persistence](/tags/#persistence), [Privilege Escalation](/tags/#privilege-escalation) |
|
||||
| [Kubernetes Sensitive Object Access Activity](kubernetes_sensitive_object_access_activity) | None | None |
|
||||
| [Kubernetes Sensitive Role Activity](kubernetes_sensitive_role_activity) | None | None |
|
||||
| [Linux Persistence Techniques](linux_persistence_techniques) | [Cron](/tags/#cron), [Scheduled Task/Job](/tags/#scheduled-task/job), [Local Account](/tags/#local-account), [Create Account](/tags/#create-account), [At](/tags/#at), [Linux and Mac File and Directory Permissions Modification](/tags/#linux-and-mac-file-and-directory-permissions-modification), [File and Directory Permissions Modification](/tags/#file-and-directory-permissions-modification), [Setuid and Setgid](/tags/#setuid-and-setgid), [Abuse Elevation Control Mechanism](/tags/#abuse-elevation-control-mechanism), [Sudo and Sudo Caching](/tags/#sudo-and-sudo-caching), [Kernel Modules and Extensions](/tags/#kernel-modules-and-extensions), [Boot or Logon Autostart Execution](/tags/#boot-or-logon-autostart-execution), [RC Scripts](/tags/#rc-scripts), [Boot or Logon Initialization Scripts](/tags/#boot-or-logon-initialization-scripts), [Unix Shell Configuration Modification](/tags/#unix-shell-configuration-modification), [Event Triggered Execution](/tags/#event-triggered-execution), [SSH Authorized Keys](/tags/#ssh-authorized-keys), [Account Manipulation](/tags/#account-manipulation), [/etc/passwd and /etc/shadow](/tags/#/etc/passwd-and-/etc/shadow), [OS Credential Dumping](/tags/#os-credential-dumping), [Dynamic Linker Hijacking](/tags/#dynamic-linker-hijacking), [Hijack Execution Flow](/tags/#hijack-execution-flow), [Systemd Timers](/tags/#systemd-timers), [Data Destruction](/tags/#data-destruction) | [Credential Access](/tags/#credential-access), [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion), [Execution](/tags/#execution), [Impact](/tags/#impact), [Persistence](/tags/#persistence), [Privilege Escalation](/tags/#privilege-escalation) |
|
||||
| [Linux Post-Exploitation](linux_post-exploitation) | [Unix Shell](/tags/#unix-shell) | [Execution](/tags/#execution) |
|
||||
| [Linux Privilege Escalation](linux_privilege_escalation) | [Cron](/tags/#cron), [Scheduled Task/Job](/tags/#scheduled-task/job), [Local Account](/tags/#local-account), [Create Account](/tags/#create-account), [At (Linux)](/tags/#at-(linux)), [Linux and Mac File and Directory Permissions Modification](/tags/#linux-and-mac-file-and-directory-permissions-modification), [File and Directory Permissions Modification](/tags/#file-and-directory-permissions-modification), [Setuid and Setgid](/tags/#setuid-and-setgid), [Abuse Elevation Control Mechanism](/tags/#abuse-elevation-control-mechanism), [Sudo and Sudo Caching](/tags/#sudo-and-sudo-caching), [Kernel Modules and Extensions](/tags/#kernel-modules-and-extensions), [Boot or Logon Autostart Execution](/tags/#boot-or-logon-autostart-execution), [RC Scripts](/tags/#rc-scripts), [Boot or Logon Initialization Scripts](/tags/#boot-or-logon-initialization-scripts), [Unix Shell Configuration Modification](/tags/#unix-shell-configuration-modification), [Event Triggered Execution](/tags/#event-triggered-execution), [Exploitation for Privilege Escalation](/tags/#exploitation-for-privilege-escalation), [SSH Authorized Keys](/tags/#ssh-authorized-keys), [Account Manipulation](/tags/#account-manipulation), [/etc/passwd and /etc/shadow](/tags/#/etc/passwd-and-/etc/shadow), [OS Credential Dumping](/tags/#os-credential-dumping), [Dynamic Linker Hijacking](/tags/#dynamic-linker-hijacking), [Hijack Execution Flow](/tags/#hijack-execution-flow), [Systemd Timers](/tags/#systemd-timers), [Data Destruction](/tags/#data-destruction) | [Credential Access](/tags/#credential-access), [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion), [Execution](/tags/#execution), [Impact](/tags/#impact), [Persistence](/tags/#persistence), [Privilege Escalation](/tags/#privilege-escalation) |
|
||||
| [Living Off The Land](living_off_the_land) | [BITS Jobs](/tags/#bits-jobs), [Ingress Tool Transfer](/tags/#ingress-tool-transfer), [Deobfuscate/Decode Files or Information](/tags/#deobfuscate/decode-files-or-information), [Windows Command Shell](/tags/#windows-command-shell), [Command and Scripting Interpreter](/tags/#command-and-scripting-interpreter), [Signed Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#signed-binary-proxy-execution), [Control Panel](/tags/#control-panel), [NTDS](/tags/#ntds), [OS Credential Dumping](/tags/#os-credential-dumping), [Compiled HTML File](/tags/#compiled-html-file), [Mshta](/tags/#mshta), [Regsvcs/Regasm](/tags/#regsvcs/regasm), [Regsvr32](/tags/#regsvr32), [Rundll32](/tags/#rundll32), [Disable or Modify Tools](/tags/#disable-or-modify-tools), [Impair Defenses](/tags/#impair-defenses), [LSASS Memory](/tags/#lsass-memory), [Security Account Manager](/tags/#security-account-manager), [Bypass User Account Control](/tags/#bypass-user-account-control), [Abuse Elevation Control Mechanism](/tags/#abuse-elevation-control-mechanism), [Unix Shell](/tags/#unix-shell), [Plist Modification](/tags/#plist-modification), [Remote Services](/tags/#remote-services), [Distributed Component Object Model](/tags/#distributed-component-object-model), [Services Registry Permissions Weakness](/tags/#services-registry-permissions-weakness), [Hijack Execution Flow](/tags/#hijack-execution-flow), [Windows Management Instrumentation](/tags/#windows-management-instrumentation), [Process Injection](/tags/#process-injection), [Modify Registry](/tags/#modify-registry), [Scheduled Task/Job](/tags/#scheduled-task/job), [At (Windows)](/tags/#at-(windows)), [Scheduled Task](/tags/#scheduled-task), [Create or Modify System Process](/tags/#create-or-modify-system-process), [Windows Service](/tags/#windows-service), [Masquerading](/tags/#masquerading), [Trusted Developer Utilities Proxy Execution](/tags/#trusted-developer-utilities-proxy-execution), [Rename System Utilities](/tags/#rename-system-utilities), [MSBuild](/tags/#msbuild), [Indirect Command Execution](/tags/#indirect-command-execution), [InstallUtil](/tags/#installutil) | [Command And Control](/tags/#command-and-control), [Credential Access](/tags/#credential-access), [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion), [Execution](/tags/#execution), [Lateral Movement](/tags/#lateral-movement), [Persistence](/tags/#persistence), [Privilege Escalation](/tags/#privilege-escalation) |
|
||||
| [Linux Privilege Escalation](linux_privilege_escalation) | [Cron](/tags/#cron), [Scheduled Task/Job](/tags/#scheduled-task/job), [Local Account](/tags/#local-account), [Create Account](/tags/#create-account), [At](/tags/#at), [Linux and Mac File and Directory Permissions Modification](/tags/#linux-and-mac-file-and-directory-permissions-modification), [File and Directory Permissions Modification](/tags/#file-and-directory-permissions-modification), [Setuid and Setgid](/tags/#setuid-and-setgid), [Abuse Elevation Control Mechanism](/tags/#abuse-elevation-control-mechanism), [Sudo and Sudo Caching](/tags/#sudo-and-sudo-caching), [Kernel Modules and Extensions](/tags/#kernel-modules-and-extensions), [Boot or Logon Autostart Execution](/tags/#boot-or-logon-autostart-execution), [RC Scripts](/tags/#rc-scripts), [Boot or Logon Initialization Scripts](/tags/#boot-or-logon-initialization-scripts), [Unix Shell Configuration Modification](/tags/#unix-shell-configuration-modification), [Event Triggered Execution](/tags/#event-triggered-execution), [Exploitation for Privilege Escalation](/tags/#exploitation-for-privilege-escalation), [SSH Authorized Keys](/tags/#ssh-authorized-keys), [Account Manipulation](/tags/#account-manipulation), [/etc/passwd and /etc/shadow](/tags/#/etc/passwd-and-/etc/shadow), [OS Credential Dumping](/tags/#os-credential-dumping), [Dynamic Linker Hijacking](/tags/#dynamic-linker-hijacking), [Hijack Execution Flow](/tags/#hijack-execution-flow), [Systemd Timers](/tags/#systemd-timers), [Data Destruction](/tags/#data-destruction) | [Credential Access](/tags/#credential-access), [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion), [Execution](/tags/#execution), [Impact](/tags/#impact), [Persistence](/tags/#persistence), [Privilege Escalation](/tags/#privilege-escalation) |
|
||||
| [Living Off The Land](living_off_the_land) | [BITS Jobs](/tags/#bits-jobs), [Ingress Tool Transfer](/tags/#ingress-tool-transfer), [Deobfuscate/Decode Files or Information](/tags/#deobfuscate/decode-files-or-information), [Windows Command Shell](/tags/#windows-command-shell), [Command and Scripting Interpreter](/tags/#command-and-scripting-interpreter), [System Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#system-binary-proxy-execution), [Control Panel](/tags/#control-panel), [NTDS](/tags/#ntds), [OS Credential Dumping](/tags/#os-credential-dumping), [Compiled HTML File](/tags/#compiled-html-file), [Mshta](/tags/#mshta), [Regsvcs/Regasm](/tags/#regsvcs/regasm), [Regsvr32](/tags/#regsvr32), [Rundll32](/tags/#rundll32), [Disable or Modify Tools](/tags/#disable-or-modify-tools), [Impair Defenses](/tags/#impair-defenses), [LSASS Memory](/tags/#lsass-memory), [Security Account Manager](/tags/#security-account-manager), [Bypass User Account Control](/tags/#bypass-user-account-control), [Abuse Elevation Control Mechanism](/tags/#abuse-elevation-control-mechanism), [Unix Shell](/tags/#unix-shell), [Plist File Modification](/tags/#plist-file-modification), [Remote Services](/tags/#remote-services), [Distributed Component Object Model](/tags/#distributed-component-object-model), [Services Registry Permissions Weakness](/tags/#services-registry-permissions-weakness), [Hijack Execution Flow](/tags/#hijack-execution-flow), [Windows Management Instrumentation](/tags/#windows-management-instrumentation), [Process Injection](/tags/#process-injection), [Modify Registry](/tags/#modify-registry), [Scheduled Task/Job](/tags/#scheduled-task/job), [At](/tags/#at), [Scheduled Task](/tags/#scheduled-task), [Create or Modify System Process](/tags/#create-or-modify-system-process), [Windows Service](/tags/#windows-service), [Masquerading](/tags/#masquerading), [Trusted Developer Utilities Proxy Execution](/tags/#trusted-developer-utilities-proxy-execution), [Rename System Utilities](/tags/#rename-system-utilities), [MSBuild](/tags/#msbuild), [Indirect Command Execution](/tags/#indirect-command-execution), [InstallUtil](/tags/#installutil) | [Command And Control](/tags/#command-and-control), [Credential Access](/tags/#credential-access), [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion), [Execution](/tags/#execution), [Lateral Movement](/tags/#lateral-movement), [Persistence](/tags/#persistence), [Privilege Escalation](/tags/#privilege-escalation) |
|
||||
| [Local Privilege Escalation With KrbRelayUp](local_privilege_escalation_with_krbrelayup) | [Steal or Forge Kerberos Tickets](/tags/#steal-or-forge-kerberos-tickets), [Windows Service](/tags/#windows-service) | [Credential Access](/tags/#credential-access), [Persistence](/tags/#persistence), [Privilege Escalation](/tags/#privilege-escalation) |
|
||||
| [Log4Shell CVE-2021-44228](log4shell_cve-2021-44228) | [Command and Scripting Interpreter](/tags/#command-and-scripting-interpreter), [PowerShell](/tags/#powershell), [Ingress Tool Transfer](/tags/#ingress-tool-transfer), [Windows Command Shell](/tags/#windows-command-shell), [Exploit Public-Facing Application](/tags/#exploit-public-facing-application) | [Command And Control](/tags/#command-and-control), [Execution](/tags/#execution), [Initial Access](/tags/#initial-access) |
|
||||
| [Malicious PowerShell](malicious_powershell) | [PowerShell](/tags/#powershell), [Command and Scripting Interpreter](/tags/#command-and-scripting-interpreter), [Ingress Tool Transfer](/tags/#ingress-tool-transfer), [OS Credential Dumping](/tags/#os-credential-dumping), [Obfuscated Files or Information](/tags/#obfuscated-files-or-information), [Remote Services](/tags/#remote-services), [Distributed Component Object Model](/tags/#distributed-component-object-model), [Windows Remote Management](/tags/#windows-remote-management), [Windows Management Instrumentation](/tags/#windows-management-instrumentation), [Scheduled Task](/tags/#scheduled-task), [Windows Service](/tags/#windows-service), [Indicator Removal from Tools](/tags/#indicator-removal-from-tools), [Component Object Model Hijacking](/tags/#component-object-model-hijacking), [Event Triggered Execution](/tags/#event-triggered-execution), [Process Injection](/tags/#process-injection), [Gather Victim Host Information](/tags/#gather-victim-host-information), [Impair Defenses](/tags/#impair-defenses) | [Command And Control](/tags/#command-and-control), [Credential Access](/tags/#credential-access), [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion), [Execution](/tags/#execution), [Lateral Movement](/tags/#lateral-movement), [Persistence](/tags/#persistence), [Privilege Escalation](/tags/#privilege-escalation), [Reconnaissance](/tags/#reconnaissance) |
|
||||
| [Masquerading - Rename System Utilities](masquerading_-_rename_system_utilities) | [Rename System Utilities](/tags/#rename-system-utilities), [Signed Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#signed-binary-proxy-execution), [Masquerading](/tags/#masquerading), [Rundll32](/tags/#rundll32), [Data Destruction](/tags/#data-destruction), [File Deletion](/tags/#file-deletion), [Indicator Removal on Host](/tags/#indicator-removal-on-host), [Trusted Developer Utilities Proxy Execution](/tags/#trusted-developer-utilities-proxy-execution), [MSBuild](/tags/#msbuild), [InstallUtil](/tags/#installutil) | [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion), [Impact](/tags/#impact) |
|
||||
| [Masquerading - Rename System Utilities](masquerading_-_rename_system_utilities) | [Rename System Utilities](/tags/#rename-system-utilities), [System Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#system-binary-proxy-execution), [Masquerading](/tags/#masquerading), [Rundll32](/tags/#rundll32), [Data Destruction](/tags/#data-destruction), [File Deletion](/tags/#file-deletion), [Indicator Removal on Host](/tags/#indicator-removal-on-host), [Trusted Developer Utilities Proxy Execution](/tags/#trusted-developer-utilities-proxy-execution), [MSBuild](/tags/#msbuild), [InstallUtil](/tags/#installutil) | [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion), [Impact](/tags/#impact) |
|
||||
| [Meterpreter](meterpreter) | [Command and Scripting Interpreter](/tags/#command-and-scripting-interpreter) | [Execution](/tags/#execution) |
|
||||
| [Microsoft MSHTML Remote Code Execution CVE-2021-40444](microsoft_mshtml_remote_code_execution_cve-2021-40444) | [Signed Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#signed-binary-proxy-execution), [Control Panel](/tags/#control-panel), [Phishing](/tags/#phishing), [Spearphishing Attachment](/tags/#spearphishing-attachment), [Rundll32](/tags/#rundll32) | [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion), [Initial Access](/tags/#initial-access) |
|
||||
| [Monitor Backup Solution]() | None | None |
|
||||
| [Microsoft MSHTML Remote Code Execution CVE-2021-40444](microsoft_mshtml_remote_code_execution_cve-2021-40444) | [System Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#system-binary-proxy-execution), [Control Panel](/tags/#control-panel), [Phishing](/tags/#phishing), [Spearphishing Attachment](/tags/#spearphishing-attachment), [Rundll32](/tags/#rundll32) | [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion), [Initial Access](/tags/#initial-access) |
|
||||
| [Microsoft Support Diagnostic Tool Vulnerability CVE-2022-30190](microsoft_support_diagnostic_tool_vulnerability_cve-2022-30190) | [Command and Scripting Interpreter](/tags/#command-and-scripting-interpreter), [System Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#system-binary-proxy-execution), [Phishing](/tags/#phishing), [Spearphishing Attachment](/tags/#spearphishing-attachment) | [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion), [Execution](/tags/#execution), [Initial Access](/tags/#initial-access) |
|
||||
| [Monitor Backup Solution](monitor_backup_solution) | None | None |
|
||||
| [Monitor for Unauthorized Software](monitor_for_unauthorized_software) | [Match Legitimate Name or Location](/tags/#match-legitimate-name-or-location), [Masquerading](/tags/#masquerading), [OS Credential Dumping](/tags/#os-credential-dumping), [Active Scanning](/tags/#active-scanning) | [Credential Access](/tags/#credential-access), [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion), [Reconnaissance](/tags/#reconnaissance) |
|
||||
| [Monitor for Updates]() | None | None |
|
||||
| [NOBELIUM Group](nobelium_group) | [Archive via Utility](/tags/#archive-via-utility), [Archive Collected Data](/tags/#archive-collected-data), [Command and Scripting Interpreter](/tags/#command-and-scripting-interpreter), [Windows Command Shell](/tags/#windows-command-shell), [Signed Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#signed-binary-proxy-execution), [Mshta](/tags/#mshta), [Obfuscated Files or Information](/tags/#obfuscated-files-or-information), [Windows Service](/tags/#windows-service), [Create or Modify System Process](/tags/#create-or-modify-system-process), [Scheduled Task](/tags/#scheduled-task), [Scheduled Task/Job](/tags/#scheduled-task/job), [Remote System Discovery](/tags/#remote-system-discovery), [System Services](/tags/#system-services), [Service Execution](/tags/#service-execution), [Exploitation for Client Execution](/tags/#exploitation-for-client-execution), [File Transfer Protocols](/tags/#file-transfer-protocols), [Application Layer Protocol](/tags/#application-layer-protocol), [Web Protocols](/tags/#web-protocols), [Web Shell](/tags/#web-shell) | [Collection](/tags/#collection), [Command And Control](/tags/#command-and-control), [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion), [Discovery](/tags/#discovery), [Execution](/tags/#execution), [Persistence](/tags/#persistence), [Privilege Escalation](/tags/#privilege-escalation) |
|
||||
| [Monitor for Updates](monitor_for_updates) | None | None |
|
||||
| [NOBELIUM Group](nobelium_group) | [Archive via Utility](/tags/#archive-via-utility), [Archive Collected Data](/tags/#archive-collected-data), [Command and Scripting Interpreter](/tags/#command-and-scripting-interpreter), [Windows Command Shell](/tags/#windows-command-shell), [System Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#system-binary-proxy-execution), [Mshta](/tags/#mshta), [Obfuscated Files or Information](/tags/#obfuscated-files-or-information), [Windows Service](/tags/#windows-service), [Create or Modify System Process](/tags/#create-or-modify-system-process), [Scheduled Task](/tags/#scheduled-task), [Scheduled Task/Job](/tags/#scheduled-task/job), [Remote System Discovery](/tags/#remote-system-discovery), [System Services](/tags/#system-services), [Service Execution](/tags/#service-execution), [Exploitation for Client Execution](/tags/#exploitation-for-client-execution), [File Transfer Protocols](/tags/#file-transfer-protocols), [Application Layer Protocol](/tags/#application-layer-protocol), [Web Protocols](/tags/#web-protocols), [Web Shell](/tags/#web-shell) | [Collection](/tags/#collection), [Command And Control](/tags/#command-and-control), [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion), [Discovery](/tags/#discovery), [Execution](/tags/#execution), [Persistence](/tags/#persistence), [Privilege Escalation](/tags/#privilege-escalation) |
|
||||
| [Netsh Abuse](netsh_abuse) | [Disable or Modify System Firewall](/tags/#disable-or-modify-system-firewall), [Impair Defenses](/tags/#impair-defenses) | [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion) |
|
||||
| [Network Discovery](network_discovery) | [System Network Configuration Discovery](/tags/#system-network-configuration-discovery) | [Discovery](/tags/#discovery) |
|
||||
| [Office 365 Detections](office_365_detections) | [Cloud Account](/tags/#cloud-account), [Create Account](/tags/#create-account), [Disable or Modify Cloud Firewall](/tags/#disable-or-modify-cloud-firewall), [Impair Defenses](/tags/#impair-defenses), [Modify Authentication Process](/tags/#modify-authentication-process), [Brute Force](/tags/#brute-force), [Email Collection](/tags/#email-collection), [Email Forwarding Rule](/tags/#email-forwarding-rule), [Remote Email Collection](/tags/#remote-email-collection), [Password Guessing](/tags/#password-guessing) | [Collection](/tags/#collection), [Credential Access](/tags/#credential-access), [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion), [Persistence](/tags/#persistence) |
|
||||
| [Orangeworm Attack Group](orangeworm_attack_group) | [PowerShell](/tags/#powershell), [Windows Command Shell](/tags/#windows-command-shell), [Windows Service](/tags/#windows-service), [Create or Modify System Process](/tags/#create-or-modify-system-process), [System Services](/tags/#system-services), [Service Execution](/tags/#service-execution) | [Execution](/tags/#execution), [Persistence](/tags/#persistence), [Privilege Escalation](/tags/#privilege-escalation) |
|
||||
| [PetitPotam NTLM Relay on Active Directory Certificate Services](petitpotam_ntlm_relay_on_active_directory_certificate_services) | [Forced Authentication](/tags/#forced-authentication), [OS Credential Dumping](/tags/#os-credential-dumping) | [Credential Access](/tags/#credential-access) |
|
||||
| [Possible Backdoor Activity Associated With MUDCARP Espionage Campaigns](possible_backdoor_activity_associated_with_mudcarp_espionage_campaigns) | [PowerShell](/tags/#powershell), [Windows Command Shell](/tags/#windows-command-shell), [Command and Scripting Interpreter](/tags/#command-and-scripting-interpreter), [Registry Run Keys / Startup Folder](/tags/#registry-run-keys-/-startup-folder), [Boot or Logon Autostart Execution](/tags/#boot-or-logon-autostart-execution) | [Execution](/tags/#execution), [Persistence](/tags/#persistence), [Privilege Escalation](/tags/#privilege-escalation) |
|
||||
| [PrintNightmare CVE-2021-34527](printnightmare_cve-2021-34527) | [Print Processors](/tags/#print-processors), [Boot or Logon Autostart Execution](/tags/#boot-or-logon-autostart-execution), [Signed Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#signed-binary-proxy-execution), [Rundll32](/tags/#rundll32), [Exploitation for Privilege Escalation](/tags/#exploitation-for-privilege-escalation) | [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion), [Persistence](/tags/#persistence), [Privilege Escalation](/tags/#privilege-escalation) |
|
||||
| [Prohibited Traffic Allowed or Protocol Mismatch](prohibited_traffic_allowed_or_protocol_mismatch) | [Remote Desktop Protocol](/tags/#remote-desktop-protocol), [Remote Services](/tags/#remote-services), [Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol](/tags/#exfiltration-over-alternative-protocol), [Exfiltration Over Unencrypted/Obfuscated Non-C2 Protocol](/tags/#exfiltration-over-unencrypted/obfuscated-non-c2-protocol), [Application Layer Protocol](/tags/#application-layer-protocol), [Web Protocols](/tags/#web-protocols), [Drive-by Compromise](/tags/#drive-by-compromise) | [Command And Control](/tags/#command-and-control), [Exfiltration](/tags/#exfiltration), [Initial Access](/tags/#initial-access), [Lateral Movement](/tags/#lateral-movement) |
|
||||
| [PrintNightmare CVE-2021-34527](printnightmare_cve-2021-34527) | [Print Processors](/tags/#print-processors), [Boot or Logon Autostart Execution](/tags/#boot-or-logon-autostart-execution), [System Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#system-binary-proxy-execution), [Rundll32](/tags/#rundll32), [Exploitation for Privilege Escalation](/tags/#exploitation-for-privilege-escalation) | [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion), [Persistence](/tags/#persistence), [Privilege Escalation](/tags/#privilege-escalation) |
|
||||
| [Prohibited Traffic Allowed or Protocol Mismatch](prohibited_traffic_allowed_or_protocol_mismatch) | [Remote Desktop Protocol](/tags/#remote-desktop-protocol), [Remote Services](/tags/#remote-services), [Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol](/tags/#exfiltration-over-alternative-protocol), [Exfiltration Over Unencrypted Non-C2 Protocol](/tags/#exfiltration-over-unencrypted-non-c2-protocol), [Application Layer Protocol](/tags/#application-layer-protocol), [Web Protocols](/tags/#web-protocols), [Drive-by Compromise](/tags/#drive-by-compromise) | [Command And Control](/tags/#command-and-control), [Exfiltration](/tags/#exfiltration), [Initial Access](/tags/#initial-access), [Lateral Movement](/tags/#lateral-movement) |
|
||||
| [ProxyShell](proxyshell) | [Server Software Component](/tags/#server-software-component), [Web Shell](/tags/#web-shell), [Exploit Public-Facing Application](/tags/#exploit-public-facing-application), [Command and Scripting Interpreter](/tags/#command-and-scripting-interpreter), [PowerShell](/tags/#powershell) | [Execution](/tags/#execution), [Initial Access](/tags/#initial-access), [Persistence](/tags/#persistence) |
|
||||
| [Ransomware](ransomware) | [Scheduled Task](/tags/#scheduled-task), [Archive via Utility](/tags/#archive-via-utility), [Archive Collected Data](/tags/#archive-collected-data), [Disable or Modify Cloud Firewall](/tags/#disable-or-modify-cloud-firewall), [Impair Defenses](/tags/#impair-defenses), [Abuse Elevation Control Mechanism](/tags/#abuse-elevation-control-mechanism), [Inhibit System Recovery](/tags/#inhibit-system-recovery), [File Deletion](/tags/#file-deletion), [Indicator Removal on Host](/tags/#indicator-removal-on-host), [Signed Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#signed-binary-proxy-execution), [CMSTP](/tags/#cmstp), [Data Destruction](/tags/#data-destruction), [User Execution](/tags/#user-execution), [Automated Exfiltration](/tags/#automated-exfiltration), [Domain Account](/tags/#domain-account), [Local Groups](/tags/#local-groups), [Domain Trust Discovery](/tags/#domain-trust-discovery), [Local Account](/tags/#local-account), [Account Discovery](/tags/#account-discovery), [Domain Groups](/tags/#domain-groups), [Permission Groups Discovery](/tags/#permission-groups-discovery), [Disable or Modify Tools](/tags/#disable-or-modify-tools), [Clear Windows Event Logs](/tags/#clear-windows-event-logs), [Service Stop](/tags/#service-stop), [Account Access Removal](/tags/#account-access-removal), [System Services](/tags/#system-services), [Service Execution](/tags/#service-execution), [Command and Scripting Interpreter](/tags/#command-and-scripting-interpreter), [Visual Basic](/tags/#visual-basic), [File and Directory Permissions Modification](/tags/#file-and-directory-permissions-modification), [Defacement](/tags/#defacement), [DLL Side-Loading](/tags/#dll-side-loading), [Hijack Execution Flow](/tags/#hijack-execution-flow), [Obfuscated Files or Information](/tags/#obfuscated-files-or-information), [Indicator Removal from Tools](/tags/#indicator-removal-from-tools), [Component Object Model Hijacking](/tags/#component-object-model-hijacking), [Event Triggered Execution](/tags/#event-triggered-execution), [Gather Victim Host Information](/tags/#gather-victim-host-information), [Registry Run Keys / Startup Folder](/tags/#registry-run-keys-/-startup-folder), [Boot or Logon Autostart Execution](/tags/#boot-or-logon-autostart-execution), [Windows Management Instrumentation](/tags/#windows-management-instrumentation), [Modify Registry](/tags/#modify-registry), [Scheduled Task/Job](/tags/#scheduled-task/job), [Masquerading](/tags/#masquerading), [Rename System Utilities](/tags/#rename-system-utilities), [Msiexec](/tags/#msiexec), [Data Encrypted for Impact](/tags/#data-encrypted-for-impact), [InstallUtil](/tags/#installutil), [Tool](/tags/#tool), [Server Software Component](/tags/#server-software-component), [Web Shell](/tags/#web-shell), [Exploit Public-Facing Application](/tags/#exploit-public-facing-application), [Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol](/tags/#exfiltration-over-alternative-protocol), [SMB/Windows Admin Shares](/tags/#smb/windows-admin-shares), [Remote Services](/tags/#remote-services), [Application Layer Protocol](/tags/#application-layer-protocol), [Web Protocols](/tags/#web-protocols) | [Collection](/tags/#collection), [Command And Control](/tags/#command-and-control), [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion), [Discovery](/tags/#discovery), [Execution](/tags/#execution), [Exfiltration](/tags/#exfiltration), [Impact](/tags/#impact), [Initial Access](/tags/#initial-access), [Lateral Movement](/tags/#lateral-movement), [Persistence](/tags/#persistence), [Privilege Escalation](/tags/#privilege-escalation), [Reconnaissance](/tags/#reconnaissance), [Resource Development](/tags/#resource-development) |
|
||||
| [Ransomware](ransomware) | [Scheduled Task](/tags/#scheduled-task), [Archive via Utility](/tags/#archive-via-utility), [Archive Collected Data](/tags/#archive-collected-data), [Disable or Modify Cloud Firewall](/tags/#disable-or-modify-cloud-firewall), [Impair Defenses](/tags/#impair-defenses), [Abuse Elevation Control Mechanism](/tags/#abuse-elevation-control-mechanism), [Inhibit System Recovery](/tags/#inhibit-system-recovery), [File Deletion](/tags/#file-deletion), [Indicator Removal on Host](/tags/#indicator-removal-on-host), [System Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#system-binary-proxy-execution), [CMSTP](/tags/#cmstp), [Data Destruction](/tags/#data-destruction), [User Execution](/tags/#user-execution), [Automated Exfiltration](/tags/#automated-exfiltration), [Domain Account](/tags/#domain-account), [Local Groups](/tags/#local-groups), [Domain Trust Discovery](/tags/#domain-trust-discovery), [Local Account](/tags/#local-account), [Account Discovery](/tags/#account-discovery), [Domain Groups](/tags/#domain-groups), [Permission Groups Discovery](/tags/#permission-groups-discovery), [Disable or Modify Tools](/tags/#disable-or-modify-tools), [Clear Windows Event Logs](/tags/#clear-windows-event-logs), [Service Stop](/tags/#service-stop), [Account Access Removal](/tags/#account-access-removal), [System Services](/tags/#system-services), [Service Execution](/tags/#service-execution), [Command and Scripting Interpreter](/tags/#command-and-scripting-interpreter), [Visual Basic](/tags/#visual-basic), [File and Directory Permissions Modification](/tags/#file-and-directory-permissions-modification), [Defacement](/tags/#defacement), [DLL Side-Loading](/tags/#dll-side-loading), [Hijack Execution Flow](/tags/#hijack-execution-flow), [Obfuscated Files or Information](/tags/#obfuscated-files-or-information), [Indicator Removal from Tools](/tags/#indicator-removal-from-tools), [Component Object Model Hijacking](/tags/#component-object-model-hijacking), [Event Triggered Execution](/tags/#event-triggered-execution), [Gather Victim Host Information](/tags/#gather-victim-host-information), [Registry Run Keys / Startup Folder](/tags/#registry-run-keys-/-startup-folder), [Boot or Logon Autostart Execution](/tags/#boot-or-logon-autostart-execution), [Windows Management Instrumentation](/tags/#windows-management-instrumentation), [Modify Registry](/tags/#modify-registry), [Scheduled Task/Job](/tags/#scheduled-task/job), [Masquerading](/tags/#masquerading), [Rename System Utilities](/tags/#rename-system-utilities), [Msiexec](/tags/#msiexec), [Data Encrypted for Impact](/tags/#data-encrypted-for-impact), [InstallUtil](/tags/#installutil), [Tool](/tags/#tool), [Server Software Component](/tags/#server-software-component), [Web Shell](/tags/#web-shell), [Exploit Public-Facing Application](/tags/#exploit-public-facing-application), [Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol](/tags/#exfiltration-over-alternative-protocol), [SMB/Windows Admin Shares](/tags/#smb/windows-admin-shares), [Remote Services](/tags/#remote-services), [Application Layer Protocol](/tags/#application-layer-protocol), [Web Protocols](/tags/#web-protocols) | [Collection](/tags/#collection), [Command And Control](/tags/#command-and-control), [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion), [Discovery](/tags/#discovery), [Execution](/tags/#execution), [Exfiltration](/tags/#exfiltration), [Impact](/tags/#impact), [Initial Access](/tags/#initial-access), [Lateral Movement](/tags/#lateral-movement), [Persistence](/tags/#persistence), [Privilege Escalation](/tags/#privilege-escalation), [Reconnaissance](/tags/#reconnaissance), [Resource Development](/tags/#resource-development) |
|
||||
| [Ransomware Cloud](ransomware_cloud) | [Data Encrypted for Impact](/tags/#data-encrypted-for-impact) | [Impact](/tags/#impact) |
|
||||
| [Remcos](remcos) | [Disable or Modify Tools](/tags/#disable-or-modify-tools), [Impair Defenses](/tags/#impair-defenses), [Bypass User Account Control](/tags/#bypass-user-account-control), [Abuse Elevation Control Mechanism](/tags/#abuse-elevation-control-mechanism), [Masquerading](/tags/#masquerading), [Command and Scripting Interpreter](/tags/#command-and-scripting-interpreter), [JavaScript](/tags/#javascript), [Process Injection](/tags/#process-injection), [Dynamic-link Library Injection](/tags/#dynamic-link-library-injection), [Regsvr32](/tags/#regsvr32), [Modify Registry](/tags/#modify-registry), [Credentials from Password Stores](/tags/#credentials-from-password-stores), [Credentials from Web Browsers](/tags/#credentials-from-web-browsers), [Indicator Removal on Host](/tags/#indicator-removal-on-host), [Component Object Model](/tags/#component-object-model), [Registry Run Keys / Startup Folder](/tags/#registry-run-keys-/-startup-folder), [Boot or Logon Autostart Execution](/tags/#boot-or-logon-autostart-execution), [Signed Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#signed-binary-proxy-execution), [Screen Capture](/tags/#screen-capture), [Visual Basic](/tags/#visual-basic), [Create or Modify System Process](/tags/#create-or-modify-system-process), [Gather Victim Host Information](/tags/#gather-victim-host-information), [Parent PID Spoofing](/tags/#parent-pid-spoofing), [Access Token Manipulation](/tags/#access-token-manipulation) | [Collection](/tags/#collection), [Credential Access](/tags/#credential-access), [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion), [Execution](/tags/#execution), [Persistence](/tags/#persistence), [Privilege Escalation](/tags/#privilege-escalation), [Reconnaissance](/tags/#reconnaissance) |
|
||||
| [Revil Ransomware](revil_ransomware) | [Disable or Modify Cloud Firewall](/tags/#disable-or-modify-cloud-firewall), [Impair Defenses](/tags/#impair-defenses), [Inhibit System Recovery](/tags/#inhibit-system-recovery), [Disable or Modify Tools](/tags/#disable-or-modify-tools), [Defacement](/tags/#defacement), [DLL Side-Loading](/tags/#dll-side-loading), [Hijack Execution Flow](/tags/#hijack-execution-flow), [User Execution](/tags/#user-execution), [Modify Registry](/tags/#modify-registry), [Signed Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#signed-binary-proxy-execution), [CMSTP](/tags/#cmstp) | [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion), [Execution](/tags/#execution), [Impact](/tags/#impact), [Persistence](/tags/#persistence), [Privilege Escalation](/tags/#privilege-escalation) |
|
||||
| [Remcos](remcos) | [Disable or Modify Tools](/tags/#disable-or-modify-tools), [Impair Defenses](/tags/#impair-defenses), [Bypass User Account Control](/tags/#bypass-user-account-control), [Abuse Elevation Control Mechanism](/tags/#abuse-elevation-control-mechanism), [Masquerading](/tags/#masquerading), [Command and Scripting Interpreter](/tags/#command-and-scripting-interpreter), [JavaScript](/tags/#javascript), [Process Injection](/tags/#process-injection), [Dynamic-link Library Injection](/tags/#dynamic-link-library-injection), [Regsvr32](/tags/#regsvr32), [Modify Registry](/tags/#modify-registry), [Credentials from Password Stores](/tags/#credentials-from-password-stores), [Credentials from Web Browsers](/tags/#credentials-from-web-browsers), [Indicator Removal on Host](/tags/#indicator-removal-on-host), [Component Object Model](/tags/#component-object-model), [Registry Run Keys / Startup Folder](/tags/#registry-run-keys-/-startup-folder), [Boot or Logon Autostart Execution](/tags/#boot-or-logon-autostart-execution), [System Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#system-binary-proxy-execution), [Screen Capture](/tags/#screen-capture), [Visual Basic](/tags/#visual-basic), [Create or Modify System Process](/tags/#create-or-modify-system-process), [Gather Victim Host Information](/tags/#gather-victim-host-information), [Parent PID Spoofing](/tags/#parent-pid-spoofing), [Access Token Manipulation](/tags/#access-token-manipulation) | [Collection](/tags/#collection), [Credential Access](/tags/#credential-access), [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion), [Execution](/tags/#execution), [Persistence](/tags/#persistence), [Privilege Escalation](/tags/#privilege-escalation), [Reconnaissance](/tags/#reconnaissance) |
|
||||
| [Revil Ransomware](revil_ransomware) | [Disable or Modify Cloud Firewall](/tags/#disable-or-modify-cloud-firewall), [Impair Defenses](/tags/#impair-defenses), [Inhibit System Recovery](/tags/#inhibit-system-recovery), [Disable or Modify Tools](/tags/#disable-or-modify-tools), [Defacement](/tags/#defacement), [DLL Side-Loading](/tags/#dll-side-loading), [Hijack Execution Flow](/tags/#hijack-execution-flow), [User Execution](/tags/#user-execution), [Modify Registry](/tags/#modify-registry), [System Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#system-binary-proxy-execution), [CMSTP](/tags/#cmstp) | [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion), [Execution](/tags/#execution), [Impact](/tags/#impact), [Persistence](/tags/#persistence), [Privilege Escalation](/tags/#privilege-escalation) |
|
||||
| [Router and Infrastructure Security](router_and_infrastructure_security) | [Hardware Additions](/tags/#hardware-additions), [Network Denial of Service](/tags/#network-denial-of-service), [Adversary-in-the-Middle](/tags/#adversary-in-the-middle), [ARP Cache Poisoning](/tags/#arp-cache-poisoning), [TFTP Boot](/tags/#tftp-boot), [Pre-OS Boot](/tags/#pre-os-boot), [Automated Exfiltration](/tags/#automated-exfiltration), [Traffic Duplication](/tags/#traffic-duplication) | [Collection](/tags/#collection), [Credential Access](/tags/#credential-access), [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion), [Exfiltration](/tags/#exfiltration), [Impact](/tags/#impact), [Initial Access](/tags/#initial-access), [Persistence](/tags/#persistence) |
|
||||
| [Ryuk Ransomware](ryuk_ransomware) | [Windows Command Shell](/tags/#windows-command-shell), [Inhibit System Recovery](/tags/#inhibit-system-recovery), [Data Destruction](/tags/#data-destruction), [Domain Trust Discovery](/tags/#domain-trust-discovery), [Data Encrypted for Impact](/tags/#data-encrypted-for-impact), [Command and Scripting Interpreter](/tags/#command-and-scripting-interpreter), [Scheduled Task](/tags/#scheduled-task), [Scheduled Task/Job](/tags/#scheduled-task/job), [Disable or Modify Tools](/tags/#disable-or-modify-tools), [Impair Defenses](/tags/#impair-defenses), [Service Stop](/tags/#service-stop), [Remote Desktop Protocol](/tags/#remote-desktop-protocol), [Remote Services](/tags/#remote-services) | [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion), [Discovery](/tags/#discovery), [Execution](/tags/#execution), [Impact](/tags/#impact), [Lateral Movement](/tags/#lateral-movement), [Persistence](/tags/#persistence), [Privilege Escalation](/tags/#privilege-escalation) |
|
||||
| [SQL Injection](sql_injection) | [Exploit Public-Facing Application](/tags/#exploit-public-facing-application) | [Initial Access](/tags/#initial-access) |
|
||||
| [SamSam Ransomware](samsam_ransomware) | [Match Legitimate Name or Location](/tags/#match-legitimate-name-or-location), [Masquerading](/tags/#masquerading), [OS Credential Dumping](/tags/#os-credential-dumping), [Active Scanning](/tags/#active-scanning), [User Execution](/tags/#user-execution), [Malicious File](/tags/#malicious-file), [Data Destruction](/tags/#data-destruction), [Inhibit System Recovery](/tags/#inhibit-system-recovery), [Remote Services](/tags/#remote-services), [SMB/Windows Admin Shares](/tags/#smb/windows-admin-shares), [System Services](/tags/#system-services), [Service Execution](/tags/#service-execution), [Data Encrypted for Impact](/tags/#data-encrypted-for-impact), [Remote Desktop Protocol](/tags/#remote-desktop-protocol), [System Information Discovery](/tags/#system-information-discovery) | [Credential Access](/tags/#credential-access), [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion), [Discovery](/tags/#discovery), [Execution](/tags/#execution), [Impact](/tags/#impact), [Lateral Movement](/tags/#lateral-movement), [Reconnaissance](/tags/#reconnaissance) |
|
||||
| [Signed Binary Proxy Execution InstallUtil](signed_binary_proxy_execution_installutil) | [Masquerading](/tags/#masquerading), [Rename System Utilities](/tags/#rename-system-utilities), [Signed Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#signed-binary-proxy-execution), [InstallUtil](/tags/#installutil) | [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion) |
|
||||
| [Signed Binary Proxy Execution InstallUtil](signed_binary_proxy_execution_installutil) | [Masquerading](/tags/#masquerading), [Rename System Utilities](/tags/#rename-system-utilities), [System Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#system-binary-proxy-execution), [InstallUtil](/tags/#installutil) | [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion) |
|
||||
| [Silver Sparrow](silver_sparrow) | [Ingress Tool Transfer](/tags/#ingress-tool-transfer), [Launch Agent](/tags/#launch-agent), [Create or Modify System Process](/tags/#create-or-modify-system-process), [Data Staged](/tags/#data-staged) | [Collection](/tags/#collection), [Command And Control](/tags/#command-and-control), [Persistence](/tags/#persistence), [Privilege Escalation](/tags/#privilege-escalation) |
|
||||
| [Spearphishing Attachments](spearphishing_attachments) | [Security Account Manager](/tags/#security-account-manager), [OS Credential Dumping](/tags/#os-credential-dumping), [Phishing](/tags/#phishing), [Spearphishing Attachment](/tags/#spearphishing-attachment), [Spearphishing Link](/tags/#spearphishing-link), [Malicious Link](/tags/#malicious-link), [User Execution](/tags/#user-execution) | [Credential Access](/tags/#credential-access), [Execution](/tags/#execution), [Initial Access](/tags/#initial-access) |
|
||||
| [Spectre And Meltdown Vulnerabilities]() | None | None |
|
||||
| [Splunk Vulnerabilities](splunk_vulnerabilities) | [File and Directory Discovery](/tags/#file-and-directory-discovery), [Network Denial of Service](/tags/#network-denial-of-service), [Valid Accounts](/tags/#valid-accounts), [Drive-by Compromise](/tags/#drive-by-compromise) | [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion), [Discovery](/tags/#discovery), [Impact](/tags/#impact), [Initial Access](/tags/#initial-access), [Persistence](/tags/#persistence), [Privilege Escalation](/tags/#privilege-escalation) |
|
||||
| [Spectre And Meltdown Vulnerabilities](spectre_and_meltdown_vulnerabilities) | None | None |
|
||||
| [Splunk Vulnerabilities](splunk_vulnerabilities) | [File and Directory Discovery](/tags/#file-and-directory-discovery), [Command and Scripting Interpreter](/tags/#command-and-scripting-interpreter), [Digital Certificates](/tags/#digital-certificates), [Network Denial of Service](/tags/#network-denial-of-service), [Process Injection](/tags/#process-injection), [Protocol Impersonation](/tags/#protocol-impersonation), [Digital Certificates](/tags/#digital-certificates), [Valid Accounts](/tags/#valid-accounts), [Drive-by Compromise](/tags/#drive-by-compromise), [Network Sniffing](/tags/#network-sniffing) | [Command And Control](/tags/#command-and-control), [Credential Access](/tags/#credential-access), [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion), [Discovery](/tags/#discovery), [Execution](/tags/#execution), [Impact](/tags/#impact), [Initial Access](/tags/#initial-access), [Persistence](/tags/#persistence), [Privilege Escalation](/tags/#privilege-escalation), [Resource Development](/tags/#resource-development) |
|
||||
| [Spring4Shell CVE-2022-22965](spring4shell_cve-2022-22965) | [Exploit Public-Facing Application](/tags/#exploit-public-facing-application), [Web Shell](/tags/#web-shell), [Server Software Component](/tags/#server-software-component) | [Initial Access](/tags/#initial-access), [Persistence](/tags/#persistence) |
|
||||
| [Suspicious AWS EC2 Activities](suspicious_aws_ec2_activities) | [Cloud Accounts](/tags/#cloud-accounts), [Unused/Unsupported Cloud Regions](/tags/#unused/unsupported-cloud-regions) | [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion), [Initial Access](/tags/#initial-access), [Persistence](/tags/#persistence), [Privilege Escalation](/tags/#privilege-escalation) |
|
||||
| [Suspicious AWS Login Activities](suspicious_aws_login_activities) | [Unused/Unsupported Cloud Regions](/tags/#unused/unsupported-cloud-regions), [Cloud Accounts](/tags/#cloud-accounts) | [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion), [Initial Access](/tags/#initial-access), [Persistence](/tags/#persistence), [Privilege Escalation](/tags/#privilege-escalation) |
|
||||
| [Suspicious AWS S3 Activities](suspicious_aws_s3_activities) | [Data from Cloud Storage Object](/tags/#data-from-cloud-storage-object) | [Collection](/tags/#collection) |
|
||||
| [Suspicious AWS Traffic]() | None | None |
|
||||
| [Suspicious AWS Traffic](suspicious_aws_traffic) | None | None |
|
||||
| [Suspicious Cloud Authentication Activities](suspicious_cloud_authentication_activities) | [Unused/Unsupported Cloud Regions](/tags/#unused/unsupported-cloud-regions) | [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion) |
|
||||
| [Suspicious Cloud Instance Activities](suspicious_cloud_instance_activities) | [Cloud Accounts](/tags/#cloud-accounts), [Valid Accounts](/tags/#valid-accounts), [Transfer Data to Cloud Account](/tags/#transfer-data-to-cloud-account) | [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion), [Exfiltration](/tags/#exfiltration), [Initial Access](/tags/#initial-access), [Persistence](/tags/#persistence), [Privilege Escalation](/tags/#privilege-escalation) |
|
||||
| [Suspicious Cloud Provisioning Activities](suspicious_cloud_provisioning_activities) | [Valid Accounts](/tags/#valid-accounts) | [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion), [Initial Access](/tags/#initial-access), [Persistence](/tags/#persistence), [Privilege Escalation](/tags/#privilege-escalation) |
|
||||
| [Suspicious Cloud User Activities](suspicious_cloud_user_activities) | [Cloud Accounts](/tags/#cloud-accounts), [Valid Accounts](/tags/#valid-accounts), [Cloud Infrastructure Discovery](/tags/#cloud-infrastructure-discovery), [User Execution](/tags/#user-execution) | [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion), [Discovery](/tags/#discovery), [Execution](/tags/#execution), [Initial Access](/tags/#initial-access), [Persistence](/tags/#persistence), [Privilege Escalation](/tags/#privilege-escalation) |
|
||||
| [Suspicious Command-Line Executions](suspicious_command-line_executions) | [PowerShell](/tags/#powershell), [Windows Command Shell](/tags/#windows-command-shell), [Command and Scripting Interpreter](/tags/#command-and-scripting-interpreter), [Masquerading](/tags/#masquerading), [Rename System Utilities](/tags/#rename-system-utilities) | [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion), [Execution](/tags/#execution) |
|
||||
| [Suspicious Compiled HTML Activity](suspicious_compiled_html_activity) | [Signed Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#signed-binary-proxy-execution), [Compiled HTML File](/tags/#compiled-html-file) | [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion) |
|
||||
| [Suspicious DNS Traffic](suspicious_dns_traffic) | [Exfiltration Over Unencrypted/Obfuscated Non-C2 Protocol](/tags/#exfiltration-over-unencrypted/obfuscated-non-c2-protocol), [DNS](/tags/#dns), [Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol](/tags/#exfiltration-over-alternative-protocol), [Application Layer Protocol](/tags/#application-layer-protocol), [Drive-by Compromise](/tags/#drive-by-compromise) | [Command And Control](/tags/#command-and-control), [Exfiltration](/tags/#exfiltration), [Initial Access](/tags/#initial-access) |
|
||||
| [Suspicious Compiled HTML Activity](suspicious_compiled_html_activity) | [System Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#system-binary-proxy-execution), [Compiled HTML File](/tags/#compiled-html-file) | [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion) |
|
||||
| [Suspicious DNS Traffic](suspicious_dns_traffic) | [Exfiltration Over Unencrypted Non-C2 Protocol](/tags/#exfiltration-over-unencrypted-non-c2-protocol), [DNS](/tags/#dns), [Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol](/tags/#exfiltration-over-alternative-protocol), [Application Layer Protocol](/tags/#application-layer-protocol), [Drive-by Compromise](/tags/#drive-by-compromise) | [Command And Control](/tags/#command-and-control), [Exfiltration](/tags/#exfiltration), [Initial Access](/tags/#initial-access) |
|
||||
| [Suspicious Emails](suspicious_emails) | [Phishing](/tags/#phishing), [Spearphishing Attachment](/tags/#spearphishing-attachment) | [Initial Access](/tags/#initial-access) |
|
||||
| [Suspicious GCP Storage Activities](suspicious_gcp_storage_activities) | [Data from Cloud Storage Object](/tags/#data-from-cloud-storage-object) | [Collection](/tags/#collection) |
|
||||
| [Suspicious MSHTA Activity](suspicious_mshta_activity) | [Signed Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#signed-binary-proxy-execution), [Mshta](/tags/#mshta), [Command and Scripting Interpreter](/tags/#command-and-scripting-interpreter), [Windows Command Shell](/tags/#windows-command-shell), [Registry Run Keys / Startup Folder](/tags/#registry-run-keys-/-startup-folder), [Boot or Logon Autostart Execution](/tags/#boot-or-logon-autostart-execution) | [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion), [Execution](/tags/#execution), [Persistence](/tags/#persistence), [Privilege Escalation](/tags/#privilege-escalation) |
|
||||
| [Suspicious MSHTA Activity](suspicious_mshta_activity) | [System Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#system-binary-proxy-execution), [Mshta](/tags/#mshta), [Command and Scripting Interpreter](/tags/#command-and-scripting-interpreter), [Windows Command Shell](/tags/#windows-command-shell), [Registry Run Keys / Startup Folder](/tags/#registry-run-keys-/-startup-folder), [Boot or Logon Autostart Execution](/tags/#boot-or-logon-autostart-execution) | [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion), [Execution](/tags/#execution), [Persistence](/tags/#persistence), [Privilege Escalation](/tags/#privilege-escalation) |
|
||||
| [Suspicious Okta Activity](suspicious_okta_activity) | [Valid Accounts](/tags/#valid-accounts), [Default Accounts](/tags/#default-accounts) | [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion), [Initial Access](/tags/#initial-access), [Persistence](/tags/#persistence), [Privilege Escalation](/tags/#privilege-escalation) |
|
||||
| [Suspicious Regsvcs Regasm Activity](suspicious_regsvcs_regasm_activity) | [Signed Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#signed-binary-proxy-execution), [Regsvcs/Regasm](/tags/#regsvcs/regasm) | [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion) |
|
||||
| [Suspicious Regsvr32 Activity](suspicious_regsvr32_activity) | [Signed Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#signed-binary-proxy-execution), [Regsvr32](/tags/#regsvr32), [Modify Registry](/tags/#modify-registry) | [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion) |
|
||||
| [Suspicious Rundll32 Activity](suspicious_rundll32_activity) | [Signed Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#signed-binary-proxy-execution), [Masquerading](/tags/#masquerading), [Rundll32](/tags/#rundll32), [Rename System Utilities](/tags/#rename-system-utilities), [LSASS Memory](/tags/#lsass-memory), [OS Credential Dumping](/tags/#os-credential-dumping) | [Credential Access](/tags/#credential-access), [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion) |
|
||||
| [Suspicious Regsvcs Regasm Activity](suspicious_regsvcs_regasm_activity) | [System Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#system-binary-proxy-execution), [Regsvcs/Regasm](/tags/#regsvcs/regasm) | [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion) |
|
||||
| [Suspicious Regsvr32 Activity](suspicious_regsvr32_activity) | [System Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#system-binary-proxy-execution), [Regsvr32](/tags/#regsvr32), [Modify Registry](/tags/#modify-registry) | [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion) |
|
||||
| [Suspicious Rundll32 Activity](suspicious_rundll32_activity) | [System Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#system-binary-proxy-execution), [Masquerading](/tags/#masquerading), [Rundll32](/tags/#rundll32), [Rename System Utilities](/tags/#rename-system-utilities), [LSASS Memory](/tags/#lsass-memory), [OS Credential Dumping](/tags/#os-credential-dumping) | [Credential Access](/tags/#credential-access), [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion) |
|
||||
| [Suspicious WMI Use](suspicious_wmi_use) | [Windows Management Instrumentation Event Subscription](/tags/#windows-management-instrumentation-event-subscription), [Event Triggered Execution](/tags/#event-triggered-execution), [Windows Management Instrumentation](/tags/#windows-management-instrumentation), [XSL Script Processing](/tags/#xsl-script-processing) | [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion), [Execution](/tags/#execution), [Persistence](/tags/#persistence), [Privilege Escalation](/tags/#privilege-escalation) |
|
||||
| [Suspicious Windows Registry Activities](suspicious_windows_registry_activities) | [Hidden Files and Directories](/tags/#hidden-files-and-directories), [Change Default File Association](/tags/#change-default-file-association), [Bypass User Account Control](/tags/#bypass-user-account-control), [Abuse Elevation Control Mechanism](/tags/#abuse-elevation-control-mechanism), [Port Monitors](/tags/#port-monitors), [Boot or Logon Autostart Execution](/tags/#boot-or-logon-autostart-execution), [Application Shimming](/tags/#application-shimming), [Event Triggered Execution](/tags/#event-triggered-execution), [Registry Run Keys / Startup Folder](/tags/#registry-run-keys-/-startup-folder), [Image File Execution Options Injection](/tags/#image-file-execution-options-injection), [Services Registry Permissions Weakness](/tags/#services-registry-permissions-weakness) | [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion), [Persistence](/tags/#persistence), [Privilege Escalation](/tags/#privilege-escalation) |
|
||||
| [Suspicious Zoom Child Processes](suspicious_zoom_child_processes) | [Command and Scripting Interpreter](/tags/#command-and-scripting-interpreter), [Windows Command Shell](/tags/#windows-command-shell), [Exploitation for Privilege Escalation](/tags/#exploitation-for-privilege-escalation) | [Execution](/tags/#execution), [Privilege Escalation](/tags/#privilege-escalation) |
|
||||
| [Trickbot](trickbot) | [Domain Account](/tags/#domain-account), [Account Discovery](/tags/#account-discovery), [Disable or Modify Tools](/tags/#disable-or-modify-tools), [Impair Defenses](/tags/#impair-defenses), [Process Injection](/tags/#process-injection), [Remote Services](/tags/#remote-services), [SMB/Windows Admin Shares](/tags/#smb/windows-admin-shares), [Signed Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#signed-binary-proxy-execution), [Mshta](/tags/#mshta), [Phishing](/tags/#phishing), [Spearphishing Attachment](/tags/#spearphishing-attachment), [Scheduled Task/Job](/tags/#scheduled-task/job), [Rundll32](/tags/#rundll32), [Gather Victim Network Information](/tags/#gather-victim-network-information), [IP Addresses](/tags/#ip-addresses), [Obfuscated Files or Information](/tags/#obfuscated-files-or-information), [Command and Scripting Interpreter](/tags/#command-and-scripting-interpreter) | [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion), [Discovery](/tags/#discovery), [Execution](/tags/#execution), [Initial Access](/tags/#initial-access), [Lateral Movement](/tags/#lateral-movement), [Persistence](/tags/#persistence), [Privilege Escalation](/tags/#privilege-escalation), [Reconnaissance](/tags/#reconnaissance) |
|
||||
| [Trickbot](trickbot) | [Domain Account](/tags/#domain-account), [Account Discovery](/tags/#account-discovery), [Disable or Modify Tools](/tags/#disable-or-modify-tools), [Impair Defenses](/tags/#impair-defenses), [Process Injection](/tags/#process-injection), [Remote Services](/tags/#remote-services), [SMB/Windows Admin Shares](/tags/#smb/windows-admin-shares), [System Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#system-binary-proxy-execution), [Mshta](/tags/#mshta), [Phishing](/tags/#phishing), [Spearphishing Attachment](/tags/#spearphishing-attachment), [Scheduled Task/Job](/tags/#scheduled-task/job), [Rundll32](/tags/#rundll32), [Gather Victim Network Information](/tags/#gather-victim-network-information), [IP Addresses](/tags/#ip-addresses), [Obfuscated Files or Information](/tags/#obfuscated-files-or-information), [Command and Scripting Interpreter](/tags/#command-and-scripting-interpreter) | [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion), [Discovery](/tags/#discovery), [Execution](/tags/#execution), [Initial Access](/tags/#initial-access), [Lateral Movement](/tags/#lateral-movement), [Persistence](/tags/#persistence), [Privilege Escalation](/tags/#privilege-escalation), [Reconnaissance](/tags/#reconnaissance) |
|
||||
| [Trusted Developer Utilities Proxy Execution](trusted_developer_utilities_proxy_execution) | [Masquerading](/tags/#masquerading), [Trusted Developer Utilities Proxy Execution](/tags/#trusted-developer-utilities-proxy-execution), [Rename System Utilities](/tags/#rename-system-utilities) | [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion) |
|
||||
| [Trusted Developer Utilities Proxy Execution MSBuild](trusted_developer_utilities_proxy_execution_msbuild) | [MSBuild](/tags/#msbuild), [Trusted Developer Utilities Proxy Execution](/tags/#trusted-developer-utilities-proxy-execution), [Masquerading](/tags/#masquerading), [Rename System Utilities](/tags/#rename-system-utilities) | [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion) |
|
||||
| [Unusual AWS EC2 Modifications](unusual_aws_ec2_modifications) | [Cloud Accounts](/tags/#cloud-accounts) | [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion), [Initial Access](/tags/#initial-access), [Persistence](/tags/#persistence), [Privilege Escalation](/tags/#privilege-escalation) |
|
||||
| [Unusual Processes](unusual_processes) | [Malicious File](/tags/#malicious-file), [Match Legitimate Name or Location](/tags/#match-legitimate-name-or-location), [Masquerading](/tags/#masquerading), [OS Credential Dumping](/tags/#os-credential-dumping), [Active Scanning](/tags/#active-scanning), [System Network Configuration Discovery](/tags/#system-network-configuration-discovery), [Modify Registry](/tags/#modify-registry), [Signed Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#signed-binary-proxy-execution), [Rundll32](/tags/#rundll32), [Rename System Utilities](/tags/#rename-system-utilities), [Verclsid](/tags/#verclsid), [InstallUtil](/tags/#installutil), [Tool](/tags/#tool), [Process Injection](/tags/#process-injection), [Create or Modify System Process](/tags/#create-or-modify-system-process), [Parent PID Spoofing](/tags/#parent-pid-spoofing), [Access Token Manipulation](/tags/#access-token-manipulation), [Exploit Public-Facing Application](/tags/#exploit-public-facing-application) | [Credential Access](/tags/#credential-access), [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion), [Discovery](/tags/#discovery), [Execution](/tags/#execution), [Initial Access](/tags/#initial-access), [Persistence](/tags/#persistence), [Privilege Escalation](/tags/#privilege-escalation), [Reconnaissance](/tags/#reconnaissance), [Resource Development](/tags/#resource-development) |
|
||||
| [Use of Cleartext Protocols]() | None | None |
|
||||
| [Unusual Processes](unusual_processes) | [Malicious File](/tags/#malicious-file), [Match Legitimate Name or Location](/tags/#match-legitimate-name-or-location), [Masquerading](/tags/#masquerading), [OS Credential Dumping](/tags/#os-credential-dumping), [Active Scanning](/tags/#active-scanning), [System Network Configuration Discovery](/tags/#system-network-configuration-discovery), [Modify Registry](/tags/#modify-registry), [System Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#system-binary-proxy-execution), [Rundll32](/tags/#rundll32), [Rename System Utilities](/tags/#rename-system-utilities), [Verclsid](/tags/#verclsid), [InstallUtil](/tags/#installutil), [Tool](/tags/#tool), [Process Injection](/tags/#process-injection), [Create or Modify System Process](/tags/#create-or-modify-system-process), [Parent PID Spoofing](/tags/#parent-pid-spoofing), [Access Token Manipulation](/tags/#access-token-manipulation), [Exploit Public-Facing Application](/tags/#exploit-public-facing-application) | [Credential Access](/tags/#credential-access), [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion), [Discovery](/tags/#discovery), [Execution](/tags/#execution), [Initial Access](/tags/#initial-access), [Persistence](/tags/#persistence), [Privilege Escalation](/tags/#privilege-escalation), [Reconnaissance](/tags/#reconnaissance), [Resource Development](/tags/#resource-development) |
|
||||
| [Use of Cleartext Protocols](use_of_cleartext_protocols) | None | None |
|
||||
| [VMware Server Side Injection and Privilege Escalation](vmware_server_side_injection_and_privilege_escalation) | [Exploit Public-Facing Application](/tags/#exploit-public-facing-application) | [Initial Access](/tags/#initial-access) |
|
||||
| [Web Fraud Detection](web_fraud_detection) | [Create Account](/tags/#create-account), [Valid Accounts](/tags/#valid-accounts) | [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion), [Initial Access](/tags/#initial-access), [Persistence](/tags/#persistence), [Privilege Escalation](/tags/#privilege-escalation) |
|
||||
| [WhisperGate](whispergate) | [Disable or Modify Tools](/tags/#disable-or-modify-tools), [Impair Defenses](/tags/#impair-defenses), [Windows Command Shell](/tags/#windows-command-shell), [Command and Scripting Interpreter](/tags/#command-and-scripting-interpreter), [Data Destruction](/tags/#data-destruction), [Masquerading](/tags/#masquerading), [Remote Services](/tags/#remote-services), [SMB/Windows Admin Shares](/tags/#smb/windows-admin-shares), [Distributed Component Object Model](/tags/#distributed-component-object-model), [Windows Management Instrumentation](/tags/#windows-management-instrumentation), [Windows Service](/tags/#windows-service), [Obfuscated Files or Information](/tags/#obfuscated-files-or-information), [Virtualization/Sandbox Evasion](/tags/#virtualization/sandbox-evasion), [Time Based Evasion](/tags/#time-based-evasion), [Indicator Removal on Host](/tags/#indicator-removal-on-host), [Visual Basic](/tags/#visual-basic), [Create or Modify System Process](/tags/#create-or-modify-system-process), [Rename System Utilities](/tags/#rename-system-utilities), [Signed Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#signed-binary-proxy-execution), [InstallUtil](/tags/#installutil), [Tool](/tags/#tool), [Disk Structure Wipe](/tags/#disk-structure-wipe), [Disk Wipe](/tags/#disk-wipe), [Process Injection](/tags/#process-injection), [Parent PID Spoofing](/tags/#parent-pid-spoofing), [Access Token Manipulation](/tags/#access-token-manipulation) | [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion), [Discovery](/tags/#discovery), [Execution](/tags/#execution), [Impact](/tags/#impact), [Lateral Movement](/tags/#lateral-movement), [Persistence](/tags/#persistence), [Privilege Escalation](/tags/#privilege-escalation), [Resource Development](/tags/#resource-development) |
|
||||
| [WhisperGate](whispergate) | [Disable or Modify Tools](/tags/#disable-or-modify-tools), [Impair Defenses](/tags/#impair-defenses), [Windows Command Shell](/tags/#windows-command-shell), [Command and Scripting Interpreter](/tags/#command-and-scripting-interpreter), [Data Destruction](/tags/#data-destruction), [Masquerading](/tags/#masquerading), [Remote Services](/tags/#remote-services), [SMB/Windows Admin Shares](/tags/#smb/windows-admin-shares), [Distributed Component Object Model](/tags/#distributed-component-object-model), [Windows Management Instrumentation](/tags/#windows-management-instrumentation), [Windows Service](/tags/#windows-service), [Obfuscated Files or Information](/tags/#obfuscated-files-or-information), [Virtualization/Sandbox Evasion](/tags/#virtualization/sandbox-evasion), [Time Based Evasion](/tags/#time-based-evasion), [Indicator Removal on Host](/tags/#indicator-removal-on-host), [Visual Basic](/tags/#visual-basic), [Create or Modify System Process](/tags/#create-or-modify-system-process), [Rename System Utilities](/tags/#rename-system-utilities), [System Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#system-binary-proxy-execution), [InstallUtil](/tags/#installutil), [Tool](/tags/#tool), [Disk Structure Wipe](/tags/#disk-structure-wipe), [Disk Wipe](/tags/#disk-wipe), [Process Injection](/tags/#process-injection), [Parent PID Spoofing](/tags/#parent-pid-spoofing), [Access Token Manipulation](/tags/#access-token-manipulation) | [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion), [Discovery](/tags/#discovery), [Execution](/tags/#execution), [Impact](/tags/#impact), [Lateral Movement](/tags/#lateral-movement), [Persistence](/tags/#persistence), [Privilege Escalation](/tags/#privilege-escalation), [Resource Development](/tags/#resource-development) |
|
||||
| [Windows DNS SIGRed CVE-2020-1350](windows_dns_sigred_cve-2020-1350) | [Exploitation for Client Execution](/tags/#exploitation-for-client-execution) | [Execution](/tags/#execution) |
|
||||
| [Windows Defense Evasion Tactics](windows_defense_evasion_tactics) | [Hidden Files and Directories](/tags/#hidden-files-and-directories), [Disable or Modify Tools](/tags/#disable-or-modify-tools), [Impair Defenses](/tags/#impair-defenses), [Compile After Delivery](/tags/#compile-after-delivery), [Obfuscated Files or Information](/tags/#obfuscated-files-or-information), [Modify Registry](/tags/#modify-registry), [Hide Artifacts](/tags/#hide-artifacts), [Bypass User Account Control](/tags/#bypass-user-account-control), [Abuse Elevation Control Mechanism](/tags/#abuse-elevation-control-mechanism), [Inhibit System Recovery](/tags/#inhibit-system-recovery), [Disable or Modify System Firewall](/tags/#disable-or-modify-system-firewall), [File and Directory Permissions Modification](/tags/#file-and-directory-permissions-modification), [Windows File and Directory Permissions Modification](/tags/#windows-file-and-directory-permissions-modification), [Process Injection](/tags/#process-injection), [Dynamic-link Library Injection](/tags/#dynamic-link-library-injection), [Signed Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#signed-binary-proxy-execution) | [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion), [Impact](/tags/#impact), [Privilege Escalation](/tags/#privilege-escalation) |
|
||||
| [Windows Defense Evasion Tactics](windows_defense_evasion_tactics) | [Hidden Files and Directories](/tags/#hidden-files-and-directories), [Disable or Modify Tools](/tags/#disable-or-modify-tools), [Impair Defenses](/tags/#impair-defenses), [Compile After Delivery](/tags/#compile-after-delivery), [Obfuscated Files or Information](/tags/#obfuscated-files-or-information), [Modify Registry](/tags/#modify-registry), [Hide Artifacts](/tags/#hide-artifacts), [Bypass User Account Control](/tags/#bypass-user-account-control), [Abuse Elevation Control Mechanism](/tags/#abuse-elevation-control-mechanism), [Inhibit System Recovery](/tags/#inhibit-system-recovery), [Disable or Modify System Firewall](/tags/#disable-or-modify-system-firewall), [File and Directory Permissions Modification](/tags/#file-and-directory-permissions-modification), [Windows File and Directory Permissions Modification](/tags/#windows-file-and-directory-permissions-modification), [Command and Scripting Interpreter](/tags/#command-and-scripting-interpreter), [Process Injection](/tags/#process-injection), [Dynamic-link Library Injection](/tags/#dynamic-link-library-injection), [System Binary Proxy Execution](/tags/#system-binary-proxy-execution) | [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion), [Execution](/tags/#execution), [Impact](/tags/#impact), [Privilege Escalation](/tags/#privilege-escalation) |
|
||||
| [Windows Discovery Techniques](windows_discovery_techniques) | [Permission Groups Discovery](/tags/#permission-groups-discovery), [Local Groups](/tags/#local-groups) | [Discovery](/tags/#discovery) |
|
||||
| [Windows Drivers](windows_drivers) | [Rootkit](/tags/#rootkit), [Exploitation for Privilege Escalation](/tags/#exploitation-for-privilege-escalation), [Install Root Certificate](/tags/#install-root-certificate), [Subvert Trust Controls](/tags/#subvert-trust-controls), [Registry Run Keys / Startup Folder](/tags/#registry-run-keys-/-startup-folder), [Boot or Logon Autostart Execution](/tags/#boot-or-logon-autostart-execution), [Windows Service](/tags/#windows-service), [Create or Modify System Process](/tags/#create-or-modify-system-process) | [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion), [Persistence](/tags/#persistence), [Privilege Escalation](/tags/#privilege-escalation) |
|
||||
| [Windows File Extension and Association Abuse](windows_file_extension_and_association_abuse) | [Rename System Utilities](/tags/#rename-system-utilities), [Change Default File Association](/tags/#change-default-file-association), [Masquerading](/tags/#masquerading) | [Defense Evasion](/tags/#defense-evasion), [Persistence](/tags/#persistence), [Privilege Escalation](/tags/#privilege-escalation) |
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ The search is used to detect systems that are still vulnerable to the Spectre an
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
</details>
|
||||
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -109,7 +109,8 @@ The SPL above uses the following Macros:
|
||||
* [security_content_ctime](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/blob/develop/macros/security_content_ctime.yml)
|
||||
* [security_content_summariesonly](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/blob/develop/macros/security_content_summariesonly.yml)
|
||||
|
||||
Note that **spectre_and_meltdown_vulnerable_systems_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> **spectre_and_meltdown_vulnerable_systems_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Required field
|
||||
* _time
|
||||
@@ -134,6 +135,9 @@ It is possible that your vulnerability scanner is not detecting that the patches
|
||||
| 25.0 | 50 | 50 | tbd |
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> The Risk Score is calculated by the following formula: Risk Score = (Impact * Confidence/100). Initial Confidence and Impact is set by the analytic author.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Reference
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ tags:
|
||||
- Authentication
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### WARNING THIS IS A EXPERIMENTAL object
|
||||
### :warning: WARNING THIS IS A EXPERIMENTAL analytic
|
||||
We have not been able to test, simulate, or build datasets for this object. Use at your own risk. This analytic is **NOT** supported.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ The search queries the authentication logs for assets that are categorized as ro
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
</details>
|
||||
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -107,7 +107,8 @@ The SPL above uses the following Macros:
|
||||
* [security_content_ctime](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/blob/develop/macros/security_content_ctime.yml)
|
||||
* [security_content_summariesonly](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/blob/develop/macros/security_content_summariesonly.yml)
|
||||
|
||||
Note that **detect_new_login_attempts_to_routers_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> **detect_new_login_attempts_to_routers_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Required field
|
||||
* _time
|
||||
@@ -135,6 +136,9 @@ Legitimate router connections may appear as new connections
|
||||
| 25.0 | 50 | 50 | tbd |
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> The Risk Score is calculated by the following formula: Risk Score = (Impact * Confidence/100). Initial Confidence and Impact is set by the analytic author.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Reference
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ This search returns a list of hosts that have not successfully completed a backu
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
</details>
|
||||
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
`netbackup` MESSAGE="Disk/Partition backup completed successfully."
|
||||
@@ -102,7 +102,8 @@ The SPL above uses the following Macros:
|
||||
* [security_content_ctime](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/blob/develop/macros/security_content_ctime.yml)
|
||||
* [netbackup](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/blob/develop/macros/netbackup.yml)
|
||||
|
||||
Note that **extended_period_without_successful_netbackup_backups_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> **extended_period_without_successful_netbackup_backups_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Required field
|
||||
* _time
|
||||
@@ -129,6 +130,9 @@ None identified
|
||||
| 25.0 | 50 | 50 | tbd |
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> The Risk Score is calculated by the following formula: Risk Score = (Impact * Confidence/100). Initial Confidence and Impact is set by the analytic author.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Reference
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ This detection search will help profile user accounts in your environment by ide
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
</details>
|
||||
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -112,7 +112,8 @@ This detection search will help profile user accounts in your environment by ide
|
||||
The SPL above uses the following Macros:
|
||||
* [security_content_ctime](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/blob/develop/macros/security_content_ctime.yml)
|
||||
|
||||
Note that **identify_new_user_accounts_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> **identify_new_user_accounts_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Required field
|
||||
* _time
|
||||
@@ -137,6 +138,9 @@ If the Identity_Management data model is not updated regularly, this search coul
|
||||
| 25.0 | 50 | 50 | tbd |
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> The Risk Score is calculated by the following formula: Risk Score = (Impact * Confidence/100). Initial Confidence and Impact is set by the analytic author.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Reference
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ This search gives you the hosts where a backup was attempted and then failed.
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
</details>
|
||||
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
`netbackup`
|
||||
@@ -101,7 +101,8 @@ The SPL above uses the following Macros:
|
||||
* [security_content_ctime](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/blob/develop/macros/security_content_ctime.yml)
|
||||
* [netbackup](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/blob/develop/macros/netbackup.yml)
|
||||
|
||||
Note that **unsuccessful_netbackup_backups_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> **unsuccessful_netbackup_backups_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Required field
|
||||
* _time
|
||||
@@ -126,6 +127,9 @@ None identified
|
||||
| 25.0 | 50 | 50 | tbd |
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> The Risk Score is calculated by the following formula: Risk Score = (Impact * Confidence/100). Initial Confidence and Impact is set by the analytic author.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Reference
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ tags:
|
||||
- Network_Sessions
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### WARNING THIS IS A EXPERIMENTAL object
|
||||
### :warning: WARNING THIS IS A EXPERIMENTAL analytic
|
||||
We have not been able to test, simulate, or build datasets for this object. Use at your own risk. This analytic is **NOT** supported.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ By populating the organization's assets within the assets_by_str.csv, we will be
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
</details>
|
||||
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -109,7 +109,8 @@ By populating the organization's assets within the assets_by_str.csv, we will be
|
||||
The SPL above uses the following Macros:
|
||||
* [security_content_summariesonly](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/blob/develop/macros/security_content_summariesonly.yml)
|
||||
|
||||
Note that **detect_unauthorized_assets_by_mac_address_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> **detect_unauthorized_assets_by_mac_address_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Required field
|
||||
* _time
|
||||
@@ -137,6 +138,9 @@ This search might be prone to high false positives. Please consider this when co
|
||||
| 25.0 | 50 | 50 | tbd |
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> The Risk Score is calculated by the following formula: Risk Score = (Impact * Confidence/100). Initial Confidence and Impact is set by the analytic author.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Reference
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ tags:
|
||||
- Updates
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### WARNING THIS IS A EXPERIMENTAL object
|
||||
### :warning: WARNING THIS IS A EXPERIMENTAL analytic
|
||||
We have not been able to test, simulate, or build datasets for this object. Use at your own risk. This analytic is **NOT** supported.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ This search looks for Windows endpoints that have not generated an event indicat
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
</details>
|
||||
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -109,7 +109,8 @@ The SPL above uses the following Macros:
|
||||
* [security_content_ctime](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/blob/develop/macros/security_content_ctime.yml)
|
||||
* [security_content_summariesonly](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/blob/develop/macros/security_content_summariesonly.yml)
|
||||
|
||||
Note that **no_windows_updates_in_a_time_frame_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> **no_windows_updates_in_a_time_frame_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Required field
|
||||
* _time
|
||||
@@ -137,6 +138,9 @@ None identified
|
||||
| 25.0 | 50 | 50 | tbd |
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> The Risk Score is calculated by the following formula: Risk Score = (Impact * Confidence/100). Initial Confidence and Impact is set by the analytic author.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Reference
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ tags:
|
||||
- Email
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### WARNING THIS IS A EXPERIMENTAL object
|
||||
### :warning: WARNING THIS IS A EXPERIMENTAL analytic
|
||||
We have not been able to test, simulate, or build datasets for this object. Use at your own risk. This analytic is **NOT** supported.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ Attackers often use spaces as a means to obfuscate an attachment's file extensio
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
</details>
|
||||
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -106,7 +106,8 @@ The SPL above uses the following Macros:
|
||||
* [security_content_ctime](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/blob/develop/macros/security_content_ctime.yml)
|
||||
* [security_content_summariesonly](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/blob/develop/macros/security_content_summariesonly.yml)
|
||||
|
||||
Note that **email_attachments_with_lots_of_spaces_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> **email_attachments_with_lots_of_spaces_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Required field
|
||||
* _time
|
||||
@@ -140,6 +141,9 @@ None at this time
|
||||
| 25.0 | 50 | 50 | tbd |
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> The Risk Score is calculated by the following formula: Risk Score = (Impact * Confidence/100). Initial Confidence and Impact is set by the analytic author.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Reference
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ This search allows you to look for evidence of exploitation for CVE-2016-4859, t
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
</details>
|
||||
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
index=_internal sourcetype=splunk_web_access return_to="/%09/*"
|
||||
@@ -106,7 +106,8 @@ index=_internal sourcetype=splunk_web_access return_to="/%09/*"
|
||||
#### Macros
|
||||
The SPL above uses the following Macros:
|
||||
|
||||
Note that **open_redirect_in_splunk_web_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> **open_redirect_in_splunk_web_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Required field
|
||||
* _time
|
||||
@@ -131,6 +132,9 @@ None identified
|
||||
| 25.0 | 50 | 50 | tbd |
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> The Risk Score is calculated by the following formula: Risk Score = (Impact * Confidence/100). Initial Confidence and Impact is set by the analytic author.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Reference
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ tags:
|
||||
- Network_Resolution
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### WARNING THIS IS A EXPERIMENTAL object
|
||||
### :warning: WARNING THIS IS A EXPERIMENTAL analytic
|
||||
We have not been able to test, simulate, or build datasets for this object. Use at your own risk. This analytic is **NOT** supported.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ The search is used to identify attempts to use your DNS Infrastructure for DDoS
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
</details>
|
||||
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -117,7 +117,8 @@ The search is used to identify attempts to use your DNS Infrastructure for DDoS
|
||||
The SPL above uses the following Macros:
|
||||
* [security_content_summariesonly](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/blob/develop/macros/security_content_summariesonly.yml)
|
||||
|
||||
Note that **large_volume_of_dns_any_queries_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> **large_volume_of_dns_any_queries_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Required field
|
||||
* _time
|
||||
@@ -145,6 +146,9 @@ Legitimate ANY requests may trigger this search, however it is unusual to see a
|
||||
| 25.0 | 50 | 50 | tbd |
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> The Risk Score is calculated by the following formula: Risk Score = (Impact * Confidence/100). Initial Confidence and Impact is set by the analytic author.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Reference
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ tags:
|
||||
- Web
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### WARNING THIS IS A EXPERIMENTAL object
|
||||
### :warning: WARNING THIS IS A EXPERIMENTAL analytic
|
||||
We have not been able to test, simulate, or build datasets for this object. Use at your own risk. This analytic is **NOT** supported.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ This search looks for specific GET or HEAD requests to web servers that are indi
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
</details>
|
||||
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -107,7 +107,8 @@ The SPL above uses the following Macros:
|
||||
* [security_content_ctime](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/blob/develop/macros/security_content_ctime.yml)
|
||||
* [security_content_summariesonly](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/blob/develop/macros/security_content_summariesonly.yml)
|
||||
|
||||
Note that **detect_attackers_scanning_for_vulnerable_jboss_servers_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> **detect_attackers_scanning_for_vulnerable_jboss_servers_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Required field
|
||||
* _time
|
||||
@@ -137,6 +138,9 @@ It's possible for legitimate HTTP requests to be made to URLs containing the sus
|
||||
| 25.0 | 50 | 50 | tbd |
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> The Risk Score is calculated by the following formula: Risk Score = (Impact * Confidence/100). Initial Confidence and Impact is set by the analytic author.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Reference
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ tags:
|
||||
- Web
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### WARNING THIS IS A EXPERIMENTAL object
|
||||
### :warning: WARNING THIS IS A EXPERIMENTAL analytic
|
||||
We have not been able to test, simulate, or build datasets for this object. Use at your own risk. This analytic is **NOT** supported.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ This search is used to detect malicious HTTP requests crafted to exploit jmx-con
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
</details>
|
||||
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -112,7 +112,8 @@ The SPL above uses the following Macros:
|
||||
* [security_content_ctime](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/blob/develop/macros/security_content_ctime.yml)
|
||||
* [security_content_summariesonly](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/blob/develop/macros/security_content_summariesonly.yml)
|
||||
|
||||
Note that **detect_malicious_requests_to_exploit_jboss_servers_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> **detect_malicious_requests_to_exploit_jboss_servers_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Required field
|
||||
* _time
|
||||
@@ -143,6 +144,9 @@ No known false positives for this detection.
|
||||
| 25.0 | 50 | 50 | tbd |
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> The Risk Score is calculated by the following formula: Risk Score = (Impact * Confidence/100). Initial Confidence and Impact is set by the analytic author.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Reference
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ This search looks for DNS requests for faux domains similar to the domains that
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
</details>
|
||||
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -96,10 +96,11 @@ This search looks for DNS requests for faux domains similar to the domains that
|
||||
#### Macros
|
||||
The SPL above uses the following Macros:
|
||||
* [security_content_ctime](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/blob/develop/macros/security_content_ctime.yml)
|
||||
* [security_content_summariesonly](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/blob/develop/macros/security_content_summariesonly.yml)
|
||||
* [brand_abuse_dns](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/blob/develop/macros/brand_abuse_dns.yml)
|
||||
* [security_content_summariesonly](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/blob/develop/macros/security_content_summariesonly.yml)
|
||||
|
||||
Note that **monitor_dns_for_brand_abuse_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> **monitor_dns_for_brand_abuse_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Required field
|
||||
* _time
|
||||
@@ -124,6 +125,9 @@ None at this time
|
||||
| 25.0 | 50 | 50 | tbd |
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> The Risk Score is calculated by the following formula: Risk Score = (Impact * Confidence/100). Initial Confidence and Impact is set by the analytic author.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Reference
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ tags:
|
||||
- Web
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### WARNING THIS IS A EXPERIMENTAL object
|
||||
### :warning: WARNING THIS IS A EXPERIMENTAL analytic
|
||||
We have not been able to test, simulate, or build datasets for this object. Use at your own risk. This analytic is **NOT** supported.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ This search looks for Web requests to faux domains similar to the one that you w
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
</details>
|
||||
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -101,10 +101,11 @@ This search looks for Web requests to faux domains similar to the one that you w
|
||||
#### Macros
|
||||
The SPL above uses the following Macros:
|
||||
* [security_content_ctime](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/blob/develop/macros/security_content_ctime.yml)
|
||||
* [brand_abuse_web](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/blob/develop/macros/brand_abuse_web.yml)
|
||||
* [security_content_summariesonly](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/blob/develop/macros/security_content_summariesonly.yml)
|
||||
* [brand_abuse_web](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/blob/develop/macros/brand_abuse_web.yml)
|
||||
|
||||
Note that **monitor_web_traffic_for_brand_abuse_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> **monitor_web_traffic_for_brand_abuse_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Required field
|
||||
* _time
|
||||
@@ -131,6 +132,9 @@ None at this time
|
||||
| 25.0 | 50 | 50 | tbd |
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> The Risk Score is calculated by the following formula: Risk Score = (Impact * Confidence/100). Initial Confidence and Impact is set by the analytic author.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Reference
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ tags:
|
||||
- Splunk Cloud
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### WARNING THIS IS A EXPERIMENTAL object
|
||||
### :warning: WARNING THIS IS A EXPERIMENTAL analytic
|
||||
We have not been able to test, simulate, or build datasets for this object. Use at your own risk. This analytic is **NOT** supported.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ This search looks for unusually long strings in the Content-Type http header tha
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
</details>
|
||||
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
`stream_http`
|
||||
@@ -109,7 +109,8 @@ This search looks for unusually long strings in the Content-Type http header tha
|
||||
The SPL above uses the following Macros:
|
||||
* [stream_http](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/blob/develop/macros/stream_http.yml)
|
||||
|
||||
Note that **unusually_long_content-type_length_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> **unusually_long_content-type_length_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Required field
|
||||
* _time
|
||||
@@ -139,6 +140,9 @@ Very few legitimate Content-Type fields will have a length greater than 100 char
|
||||
| 25.0 | 50 | 50 | tbd |
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> The Risk Score is calculated by the following formula: Risk Score = (Impact * Confidence/100). Initial Confidence and Impact is set by the analytic author.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Reference
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ The search is used to detect hosts that generate Windows Event ID 4663 for succe
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
</details>
|
||||
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -103,7 +103,8 @@ The SPL above uses the following Macros:
|
||||
* [security_content_ctime](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/blob/develop/macros/security_content_ctime.yml)
|
||||
* [security_content_summariesonly](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/blob/develop/macros/security_content_summariesonly.yml)
|
||||
|
||||
Note that **detect_usb_device_insertion_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> **detect_usb_device_insertion_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Required field
|
||||
* _time
|
||||
@@ -132,6 +133,9 @@ Legitimate USB activity will also be detected. Please verify and investigate as
|
||||
| 25.0 | 50 | 50 | tbd |
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> The Risk Score is calculated by the following formula: Risk Score = (Impact * Confidence/100). Initial Confidence and Impact is set by the analytic author.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Reference
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ tags:
|
||||
- Email
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### WARNING THIS IS A EXPERIMENTAL object
|
||||
### :warning: WARNING THIS IS A EXPERIMENTAL analytic
|
||||
We have not been able to test, simulate, or build datasets for this object. Use at your own risk. This analytic is **NOT** supported.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ This search looks for emails claiming to be sent from a domain similar to one th
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
</details>
|
||||
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -108,7 +108,8 @@ The SPL above uses the following Macros:
|
||||
* [security_content_ctime](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/blob/develop/macros/security_content_ctime.yml)
|
||||
* [security_content_summariesonly](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/blob/develop/macros/security_content_summariesonly.yml)
|
||||
|
||||
Note that **monitor_email_for_brand_abuse_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> **monitor_email_for_brand_abuse_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Lookups
|
||||
The SPL above uses the following Lookups:
|
||||
@@ -142,6 +143,9 @@ None at this time
|
||||
| 25.0 | 50 | 50 | tbd |
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> The Risk Score is calculated by the following formula: Risk Score = (Impact * Confidence/100). Initial Confidence and Impact is set by the analytic author.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Reference
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ This search looks for AWS CloudTrail events where an instance is started in a pa
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
</details>
|
||||
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
`cloudtrail` earliest=-1h StartInstances
|
||||
@@ -113,7 +113,8 @@ The SPL above uses the following Macros:
|
||||
* [security_content_ctime](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/blob/develop/macros/security_content_ctime.yml)
|
||||
* [cloudtrail](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/blob/develop/macros/cloudtrail.yml)
|
||||
|
||||
Note that **ec2_instance_started_in_previously_unseen_region_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> **ec2_instance_started_in_previously_unseen_region_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Required field
|
||||
* _time
|
||||
@@ -140,6 +141,9 @@ It's possible that a user has unknowingly started an instance in a new region. P
|
||||
| 25.0 | 50 | 50 | tbd |
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> The Risk Score is calculated by the following formula: Risk Score = (Impact * Confidence/100). Initial Confidence and Impact is set by the analytic author.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Reference
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ This search looks for EC2 instances being created with previously unseen AMIs.
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
</details>
|
||||
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
`cloudtrail` eventName=RunInstances [search `cloudtrail` eventName=RunInstances errorCode=success
|
||||
@@ -109,7 +109,8 @@ The SPL above uses the following Macros:
|
||||
* [security_content_ctime](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/blob/develop/macros/security_content_ctime.yml)
|
||||
* [cloudtrail](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/blob/develop/macros/cloudtrail.yml)
|
||||
|
||||
Note that **ec2_instance_started_with_previously_unseen_ami_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> **ec2_instance_started_with_previously_unseen_ami_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Required field
|
||||
* _time
|
||||
@@ -137,6 +138,9 @@ After a new AMI is created, the first systems created with that AMI will cause t
|
||||
| 25.0 | 50 | 50 | tbd |
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> The Risk Score is calculated by the following formula: Risk Score = (Impact * Confidence/100). Initial Confidence and Impact is set by the analytic author.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Reference
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ This search looks for AWS provisioning activities from previously unseen cities.
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
</details>
|
||||
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
`cloudtrail` (eventName=Run* OR eventName=Create*)
|
||||
@@ -118,7 +118,8 @@ This search looks for AWS provisioning activities from previously unseen cities.
|
||||
The SPL above uses the following Macros:
|
||||
* [cloudtrail](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/blob/develop/macros/cloudtrail.yml)
|
||||
|
||||
Note that **aws_cloud_provisioning_from_previously_unseen_city_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> **aws_cloud_provisioning_from_previously_unseen_city_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Required field
|
||||
* _time
|
||||
@@ -146,6 +147,9 @@ This is a strictly behavioral search, so we define "false positive" slightly dif
|
||||
| 25.0 | 50 | 50 | tbd |
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> The Risk Score is calculated by the following formula: Risk Score = (Impact * Confidence/100). Initial Confidence and Impact is set by the analytic author.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Reference
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ This search looks for AWS provisioning activities from previously unseen countri
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
</details>
|
||||
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
`cloudtrail` (eventName=Run* OR eventName=Create*)
|
||||
@@ -118,7 +118,8 @@ This search looks for AWS provisioning activities from previously unseen countri
|
||||
The SPL above uses the following Macros:
|
||||
* [cloudtrail](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/blob/develop/macros/cloudtrail.yml)
|
||||
|
||||
Note that **aws_cloud_provisioning_from_previously_unseen_country_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> **aws_cloud_provisioning_from_previously_unseen_country_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Required field
|
||||
* _time
|
||||
@@ -146,6 +147,9 @@ This is a strictly behavioral search, so we define "false positive" slightly dif
|
||||
| 25.0 | 50 | 50 | tbd |
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> The Risk Score is calculated by the following formula: Risk Score = (Impact * Confidence/100). Initial Confidence and Impact is set by the analytic author.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Reference
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ This search looks for AWS provisioning activities from previously unseen IP addr
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
</details>
|
||||
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
`cloudtrail` (eventName=Run* OR eventName=Create*) [search `cloudtrail` (eventName=Run* OR eventName=Create*)
|
||||
@@ -108,7 +108,8 @@ This search looks for AWS provisioning activities from previously unseen IP addr
|
||||
The SPL above uses the following Macros:
|
||||
* [cloudtrail](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/blob/develop/macros/cloudtrail.yml)
|
||||
|
||||
Note that **aws_cloud_provisioning_from_previously_unseen_ip_address_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> **aws_cloud_provisioning_from_previously_unseen_ip_address_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Required field
|
||||
* _time
|
||||
@@ -136,6 +137,9 @@ This is a strictly behavioral search, so we define "false positive" slightly dif
|
||||
| 25.0 | 50 | 50 | tbd |
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> The Risk Score is calculated by the following formula: Risk Score = (Impact * Confidence/100). Initial Confidence and Impact is set by the analytic author.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Reference
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ This search looks for AWS provisioning activities from previously unseen regions
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
</details>
|
||||
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
`cloudtrail` (eventName=Run* OR eventName=Create*)
|
||||
@@ -118,7 +118,8 @@ This search looks for AWS provisioning activities from previously unseen regions
|
||||
The SPL above uses the following Macros:
|
||||
* [cloudtrail](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/blob/develop/macros/cloudtrail.yml)
|
||||
|
||||
Note that **aws_cloud_provisioning_from_previously_unseen_region_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> **aws_cloud_provisioning_from_previously_unseen_region_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Required field
|
||||
* _time
|
||||
@@ -146,6 +147,9 @@ This is a strictly behavioral search, so we define "false positive" slightly dif
|
||||
| 25.0 | 50 | 50 | tbd |
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> The Risk Score is calculated by the following formula: Risk Score = (Impact * Confidence/100). Initial Confidence and Impact is set by the analytic author.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Reference
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ This search detects new API calls that have either never been seen before or tha
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
</details>
|
||||
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
`cloudtrail` eventType=AwsApiCall errorCode=success userIdentity.type=AssumedRole [search `cloudtrail` eventType=AwsApiCall errorCode=success userIdentity.type=AssumedRole
|
||||
@@ -120,7 +120,8 @@ The SPL above uses the following Macros:
|
||||
* [security_content_ctime](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/blob/develop/macros/security_content_ctime.yml)
|
||||
* [cloudtrail](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/blob/develop/macros/cloudtrail.yml)
|
||||
|
||||
Note that **detect_new_api_calls_from_user_roles_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> **detect_new_api_calls_from_user_roles_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Lookups
|
||||
The SPL above uses the following Lookups:
|
||||
@@ -155,6 +156,9 @@ It is possible that there are legitimate user roles making new or infrequently u
|
||||
| 25.0 | 50 | 50 | tbd |
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> The Risk Score is calculated by the following formula: Risk Score = (Impact * Confidence/100). Initial Confidence and Impact is set by the analytic author.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Reference
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ This search will detect users creating spikes in API activity related to securit
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
</details>
|
||||
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
`cloudtrail` `security_group_api_calls` [search `cloudtrail` `security_group_api_calls`
|
||||
@@ -124,10 +124,11 @@ This search will detect users creating spikes in API activity related to securit
|
||||
|
||||
#### Macros
|
||||
The SPL above uses the following Macros:
|
||||
* [cloudtrail](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/blob/develop/macros/cloudtrail.yml)
|
||||
* [security_group_api_calls](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/blob/develop/macros/security_group_api_calls.yml)
|
||||
* [cloudtrail](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/blob/develop/macros/cloudtrail.yml)
|
||||
|
||||
Note that **detect_spike_in_security_group_activity_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> **detect_spike_in_security_group_activity_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Lookups
|
||||
The SPL above uses the following Lookups:
|
||||
@@ -159,6 +160,9 @@ Based on the values of`dataPointThreshold` and `deviationThreshold`, the false p
|
||||
| 25.0 | 50 | 50 | tbd |
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> The Risk Score is calculated by the following formula: Risk Score = (Impact * Confidence/100). Initial Confidence and Impact is set by the analytic author.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Reference
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ tags:
|
||||
- Splunk Cloud
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### WARNING THIS IS A EXPERIMENTAL object
|
||||
### :warning: WARNING THIS IS A EXPERIMENTAL analytic
|
||||
We have not been able to test, simulate, or build datasets for this object. Use at your own risk. This analytic is **NOT** supported.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ This search will detect spike in blocked outbound network connections originatin
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
</details>
|
||||
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
`cloudwatchlogs_vpcflow` action=blocked (src_ip=10.0.0.0/8 OR src_ip=172.16.0.0/12 OR src_ip=192.168.0.0/16) ( dest_ip!=10.0.0.0/8 AND dest_ip!=172.16.0.0/12 AND dest_ip!=192.168.0.0/16) [search `cloudwatchlogs_vpcflow` action=blocked (src_ip=10.0.0.0/8 OR src_ip=172.16.0.0/12 OR src_ip=192.168.0.0/16) ( dest_ip!=10.0.0.0/8 AND dest_ip!=172.16.0.0/12 AND dest_ip!=192.168.0.0/16)
|
||||
@@ -115,7 +115,8 @@ This search will detect spike in blocked outbound network connections originatin
|
||||
The SPL above uses the following Macros:
|
||||
* [cloudwatchlogs_vpcflow](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/blob/develop/macros/cloudwatchlogs_vpcflow.yml)
|
||||
|
||||
Note that **detect_spike_in_blocked_outbound_traffic_from_your_aws_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> **detect_spike_in_blocked_outbound_traffic_from_your_aws_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Lookups
|
||||
The SPL above uses the following Lookups:
|
||||
@@ -151,6 +152,9 @@ The false-positive rate may vary based on the values of`dataPointThreshold` and
|
||||
| 25.0 | 50 | 50 | tbd |
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> The Risk Score is calculated by the following formula: Risk Score = (Impact * Confidence/100). Initial Confidence and Impact is set by the analytic author.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Reference
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ This search looks for AWS CloudTrail events where a user logged into the AWS acc
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
</details>
|
||||
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
`cloudtrail` userIdentity.sessionContext.attributes.mfaAuthenticated=false
|
||||
@@ -104,7 +104,8 @@ The SPL above uses the following Macros:
|
||||
* [security_content_ctime](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/blob/develop/macros/security_content_ctime.yml)
|
||||
* [cloudtrail](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/blob/develop/macros/cloudtrail.yml)
|
||||
|
||||
Note that **detect_api_activity_from_users_without_mfa_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> **detect_api_activity_from_users_without_mfa_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Lookups
|
||||
The SPL above uses the following Lookups:
|
||||
@@ -145,6 +146,9 @@ Many service accounts configured within an AWS infrastructure do not have multi
|
||||
| 25.0 | 50 | 50 | tbd |
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> The Risk Score is calculated by the following formula: Risk Score = (Impact * Confidence/100). Initial Confidence and Impact is set by the analytic author.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Reference
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ This search will detect users creating spikes in API activity related to network
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
</details>
|
||||
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
`cloudtrail` `network_acl_events` [search `cloudtrail` `network_acl_events`
|
||||
@@ -125,7 +125,8 @@ The SPL above uses the following Macros:
|
||||
* [network_acl_events](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/blob/develop/macros/network_acl_events.yml)
|
||||
* [cloudtrail](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/blob/develop/macros/cloudtrail.yml)
|
||||
|
||||
Note that **detect_spike_in_network_acl_activity_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> **detect_spike_in_network_acl_activity_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Lookups
|
||||
The SPL above uses the following Lookups:
|
||||
@@ -157,6 +158,9 @@ The false-positive rate may vary based on the values of`dataPointThreshold` and
|
||||
| 25.0 | 50 | 50 | tbd |
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> The Risk Score is calculated by the following formula: Risk Score = (Impact * Confidence/100). Initial Confidence and Impact is set by the analytic author.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Reference
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ tags:
|
||||
- Network_Traffic
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### WARNING THIS IS A EXPERIMENTAL object
|
||||
### :warning: WARNING THIS IS A EXPERIMENTAL analytic
|
||||
We have not been able to test, simulate, or build datasets for this object. Use at your own risk. This analytic is **NOT** supported.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ This search looks for outbound ICMP packets with a packet size larger than 1,000
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
</details>
|
||||
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -113,7 +113,8 @@ The SPL above uses the following Macros:
|
||||
* [security_content_ctime](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/blob/develop/macros/security_content_ctime.yml)
|
||||
* [security_content_summariesonly](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/blob/develop/macros/security_content_summariesonly.yml)
|
||||
|
||||
Note that **detect_large_outbound_icmp_packets_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> **detect_large_outbound_icmp_packets_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Required field
|
||||
* _time
|
||||
@@ -145,6 +146,9 @@ ICMP packets are used in a variety of ways to help troubleshoot networking issue
|
||||
| 25.0 | 50 | 50 | tbd |
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> The Risk Score is calculated by the following formula: Risk Score = (Impact * Confidence/100). Initial Confidence and Impact is set by the analytic author.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Reference
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ This search allows you to look for evidence of exploitation for CVE-2018-11409,
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
</details>
|
||||
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
index=_internal sourcetype=splunkd_ui_access server-info
|
||||
@@ -112,7 +112,8 @@ index=_internal sourcetype=splunkd_ui_access server-info
|
||||
The SPL above uses the following Macros:
|
||||
* [security_content_ctime](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/blob/develop/macros/security_content_ctime.yml)
|
||||
|
||||
Note that **splunk_enterprise_information_disclosure_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> **splunk_enterprise_information_disclosure_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Required field
|
||||
* _time
|
||||
@@ -137,6 +138,9 @@ Retrieving server information may be a legitimate API request. Verify that the a
|
||||
| 25.0 | 50 | 50 | tbd |
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> The Risk Score is calculated by the following formula: Risk Score = (Impact * Confidence/100). Initial Confidence and Impact is set by the analytic author.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Reference
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ tags:
|
||||
- Splunk Cloud
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### WARNING THIS IS A EXPERIMENTAL object
|
||||
### :warning: WARNING THIS IS A EXPERIMENTAL analytic
|
||||
We have not been able to test, simulate, or build datasets for this object. Use at your own risk. This analytic is **NOT** supported.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ This search looks at S3 bucket-access logs and detects new or previously unseen
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
</details>
|
||||
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
`aws_s3_accesslogs` http_status=200 [search `aws_s3_accesslogs` http_status=200
|
||||
@@ -121,7 +121,8 @@ The SPL above uses the following Macros:
|
||||
* [security_content_ctime](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/blob/develop/macros/security_content_ctime.yml)
|
||||
* [aws_s3_accesslogs](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/blob/develop/macros/aws_s3_accesslogs.yml)
|
||||
|
||||
Note that **detect_s3_access_from_a_new_ip_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> **detect_s3_access_from_a_new_ip_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Required field
|
||||
* _time
|
||||
@@ -149,6 +150,9 @@ S3 buckets can be accessed from any IP, as long as it can make a successful conn
|
||||
| 25.0 | 50 | 50 | tbd |
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> The Risk Score is calculated by the following formula: Risk Score = (Impact * Confidence/100). Initial Confidence and Impact is set by the analytic author.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Reference
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ This search is used to identify the creation of multiple user accounts using the
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
</details>
|
||||
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
`stream_http` http_content_type=text* uri="/magento2/customer/account/loginPost/"
|
||||
@@ -111,7 +111,8 @@ This search is used to identify the creation of multiple user accounts using the
|
||||
The SPL above uses the following Macros:
|
||||
* [stream_http](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/blob/develop/macros/stream_http.yml)
|
||||
|
||||
Note that **web_fraud_-_account_harvesting_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> **web_fraud_-_account_harvesting_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Required field
|
||||
* _time
|
||||
@@ -139,6 +140,9 @@ As is common with many fraud-related searches, we are usually looking to attribu
|
||||
| 25.0 | 50 | 50 | tbd |
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> The Risk Score is calculated by the following formula: Risk Score = (Impact * Confidence/100). Initial Confidence and Impact is set by the analytic author.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Reference
|
||||
|
||||
* [https://splunkbase.splunk.com/app/2734/](https://splunkbase.splunk.com/app/2734/)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ This search is used to examine web sessions to identify those where the clicks a
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
</details>
|
||||
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
`stream_http` http_content_type=text*
|
||||
@@ -112,7 +112,8 @@ This search is used to examine web sessions to identify those where the clicks a
|
||||
The SPL above uses the following Macros:
|
||||
* [stream_http](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/blob/develop/macros/stream_http.yml)
|
||||
|
||||
Note that **web_fraud_-_anomalous_user_clickspeed_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> **web_fraud_-_anomalous_user_clickspeed_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Required field
|
||||
* _time
|
||||
@@ -139,6 +140,9 @@ As is common with many fraud-related searches, we are usually looking to attribu
|
||||
| 25.0 | 50 | 50 | tbd |
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> The Risk Score is calculated by the following formula: Risk Score = (Impact * Confidence/100). Initial Confidence and Impact is set by the analytic author.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Reference
|
||||
|
||||
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Session_ID](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Session_ID)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ This search is used to identify user accounts that share a common password.
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
</details>
|
||||
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
`stream_http` http_content_type=text* uri=/magento2/customer/account/loginPost*
|
||||
@@ -101,7 +101,8 @@ This search is used to identify user accounts that share a common password.
|
||||
The SPL above uses the following Macros:
|
||||
* [stream_http](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/blob/develop/macros/stream_http.yml)
|
||||
|
||||
Note that **web_fraud_-_password_sharing_across_accounts_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> **web_fraud_-_password_sharing_across_accounts_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Required field
|
||||
* _time
|
||||
@@ -128,6 +129,9 @@ As is common with many fraud-related searches, we are usually looking to attribu
|
||||
| 25.0 | 50 | 50 | tbd |
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> The Risk Score is calculated by the following formula: Risk Score = (Impact * Confidence/100). Initial Confidence and Impact is set by the analytic author.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Reference
|
||||
|
||||
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Session_ID](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Session_ID)
|
||||
|
||||
+6
-2
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ This search looks for cloud compute instances being created with previously unse
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
</details>
|
||||
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -107,7 +107,8 @@ This search looks for cloud compute instances being created with previously unse
|
||||
The SPL above uses the following Macros:
|
||||
* [security_content_ctime](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/blob/develop/macros/security_content_ctime.yml)
|
||||
|
||||
Note that **cloud_compute_instance_created_with_previously_unseen_image_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> **cloud_compute_instance_created_with_previously_unseen_image_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Lookups
|
||||
The SPL above uses the following Lookups:
|
||||
@@ -141,6 +142,9 @@ After a new image is created, the first systems created with that image will cau
|
||||
| 36.0 | 60 | 60 | User $user$ is creating an instance $dest$ with an image that has not been previously seen. |
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> The Risk Score is calculated by the following formula: Risk Score = (Impact * Confidence/100). Initial Confidence and Impact is set by the analytic author.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Reference
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ tags:
|
||||
- Splunk Cloud
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### WARNING THIS IS A EXPERIMENTAL object
|
||||
### :warning: WARNING THIS IS A EXPERIMENTAL analytic
|
||||
We have not been able to test, simulate, or build datasets for this object. Use at your own risk. This analytic is **NOT** supported.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ This search looks for the creation of WMI permanent event subscriptions.
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
</details>
|
||||
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
`wmi` EventCode=5861 Binding
|
||||
@@ -117,7 +117,8 @@ The SPL above uses the following Macros:
|
||||
* [security_content_ctime](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/blob/develop/macros/security_content_ctime.yml)
|
||||
* [wmi](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/blob/develop/macros/wmi.yml)
|
||||
|
||||
Note that **wmi_permanent_event_subscription_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> **wmi_permanent_event_subscription_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Required field
|
||||
* _time
|
||||
@@ -146,6 +147,9 @@ Although unlikely, administrators may use event subscriptions for legitimate pur
|
||||
| 25.0 | 50 | 50 | tbd |
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> The Risk Score is calculated by the following formula: Risk Score = (Impact * Confidence/100). Initial Confidence and Impact is set by the analytic author.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Reference
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ tags:
|
||||
- Splunk Cloud
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### WARNING THIS IS A EXPERIMENTAL object
|
||||
### :warning: WARNING THIS IS A EXPERIMENTAL analytic
|
||||
We have not been able to test, simulate, or build datasets for this object. Use at your own risk. This analytic is **NOT** supported.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ This search looks for the creation of WMI temporary event subscriptions.
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
</details>
|
||||
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
`wmi` EventCode=5860 Temporary
|
||||
@@ -116,7 +116,8 @@ The SPL above uses the following Macros:
|
||||
* [security_content_ctime](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/blob/develop/macros/security_content_ctime.yml)
|
||||
* [wmi](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/blob/develop/macros/wmi.yml)
|
||||
|
||||
Note that **wmi_temporary_event_subscription_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> **wmi_temporary_event_subscription_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Required field
|
||||
* _time
|
||||
@@ -144,6 +145,9 @@ Some software may create WMI temporary event subscriptions for various purposes.
|
||||
| 25.0 | 50 | 50 | tbd |
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> The Risk Score is calculated by the following formula: Risk Score = (Impact * Confidence/100). Initial Confidence and Impact is set by the analytic author.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Reference
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ The search looks for modifications to the hosts file on all Windows endpoints ac
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
</details>
|
||||
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -107,7 +107,8 @@ The SPL above uses the following Macros:
|
||||
* [security_content_ctime](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/blob/develop/macros/security_content_ctime.yml)
|
||||
* [security_content_summariesonly](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/blob/develop/macros/security_content_summariesonly.yml)
|
||||
|
||||
Note that **windows_hosts_file_modification_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> **windows_hosts_file_modification_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Required field
|
||||
* _time
|
||||
@@ -132,6 +133,9 @@ There may be legitimate reasons for system administrators to add entries to this
|
||||
| 25.0 | 50 | 50 | tbd |
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> The Risk Score is calculated by the following formula: Risk Score = (Impact * Confidence/100). Initial Confidence and Impact is set by the analytic author.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Reference
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ tags:
|
||||
- Splunk Cloud
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### WARNING THIS IS A EXPERIMENTAL object
|
||||
### :warning: WARNING THIS IS A EXPERIMENTAL analytic
|
||||
We have not been able to test, simulate, or build datasets for this object. Use at your own risk. This analytic is **NOT** supported.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ This search detects users creating spikes in API activity related to deletion of
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
</details>
|
||||
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
`cloudtrail` eventName=DeleteBucket [search `cloudtrail` eventName=DeleteBucket
|
||||
@@ -126,7 +126,8 @@ This search detects users creating spikes in API activity related to deletion of
|
||||
The SPL above uses the following Macros:
|
||||
* [cloudtrail](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/blob/develop/macros/cloudtrail.yml)
|
||||
|
||||
Note that **detect_spike_in_s3_bucket_deletion_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> **detect_spike_in_s3_bucket_deletion_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Lookups
|
||||
The SPL above uses the following Lookups:
|
||||
@@ -159,6 +160,9 @@ Based on the values of`dataPointThreshold` and `deviationThreshold`, the false p
|
||||
| 25.0 | 50 | 50 | tbd |
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> The Risk Score is calculated by the following formula: Risk Score = (Impact * Confidence/100). Initial Confidence and Impact is set by the analytic author.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Reference
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ The following analytic identifies usage of `wmic.exe` spawning a local or remote
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
</details>
|
||||
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -110,11 +110,12 @@ The following analytic identifies usage of `wmic.exe` spawning a local or remote
|
||||
|
||||
#### Macros
|
||||
The SPL above uses the following Macros:
|
||||
* [process_wmic](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/blob/develop/macros/process_wmic.yml)
|
||||
* [security_content_ctime](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/blob/develop/macros/security_content_ctime.yml)
|
||||
* [security_content_summariesonly](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/blob/develop/macros/security_content_summariesonly.yml)
|
||||
* [process_wmic](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/blob/develop/macros/process_wmic.yml)
|
||||
|
||||
Note that **remote_wmi_command_attempt_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> **remote_wmi_command_attempt_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Required field
|
||||
* _time
|
||||
@@ -147,6 +148,9 @@ Administrators may use this legitimately to gather info from remote systems. Fil
|
||||
| 36.0 | 60 | 60 | A wmic.exe process $process$ contain node commandline $process$ in host $dest$ |
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> The Risk Score is calculated by the following formula: Risk Score = (Impact * Confidence/100). Initial Confidence and Impact is set by the analytic author.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Reference
|
||||
|
||||
* [https://github.com/redcanaryco/atomic-red-team/blob/master/atomics/T1047/T1047.yaml](https://github.com/redcanaryco/atomic-red-team/blob/master/atomics/T1047/T1047.yaml)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ The fsutil.exe application is a legitimate Windows utility used to perform tasks
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
</details>
|
||||
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -116,7 +116,8 @@ The SPL above uses the following Macros:
|
||||
* [security_content_ctime](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/blob/develop/macros/security_content_ctime.yml)
|
||||
* [security_content_summariesonly](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/blob/develop/macros/security_content_summariesonly.yml)
|
||||
|
||||
Note that **usn_journal_deletion_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> **usn_journal_deletion_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Required field
|
||||
* _time
|
||||
@@ -148,6 +149,9 @@ None identified
|
||||
| 45.0 | 50 | 90 | Possible USN journal deletion on $dest$ |
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> The Risk Score is calculated by the following formula: Risk Score = (Impact * Confidence/100). Initial Confidence and Impact is set by the analytic author.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Reference
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ tags:
|
||||
- Splunk Cloud
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### WARNING THIS IS A EXPERIMENTAL object
|
||||
### :warning: WARNING THIS IS A EXPERIMENTAL analytic
|
||||
We have not been able to test, simulate, or build datasets for this object. Use at your own risk. This analytic is **NOT** supported.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ This search looks for suspicious Java classes that are often used to exploit rem
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
</details>
|
||||
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
`stream_http` http_method=POST http_content_length>1
|
||||
@@ -105,7 +105,8 @@ The SPL above uses the following Macros:
|
||||
* [stream_http](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/blob/develop/macros/stream_http.yml)
|
||||
* [security_content_ctime](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/blob/develop/macros/security_content_ctime.yml)
|
||||
|
||||
Note that **suspicious_java_classes_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> **suspicious_java_classes_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Required field
|
||||
* _time
|
||||
@@ -138,6 +139,9 @@ There are no known false positives.
|
||||
| 25.0 | 50 | 50 | tbd |
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> The Risk Score is calculated by the following formula: Risk Score = (Impact * Confidence/100). Initial Confidence and Impact is set by the analytic author.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Reference
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ The search looks for file writes with extensions consistent with a SamSam ransom
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
</details>
|
||||
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
#### Search
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -104,7 +104,8 @@ The SPL above uses the following Macros:
|
||||
* [security_content_ctime](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/blob/develop/macros/security_content_ctime.yml)
|
||||
* [security_content_summariesonly](https://github.com/splunk/security_content/blob/develop/macros/security_content_summariesonly.yml)
|
||||
|
||||
Note that **file_with_samsam_extension_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> **file_with_samsam_extension_filter** is a empty macro by default. It allows the user to filter out any results (false positives) without editing the SPL.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Required field
|
||||
* _time
|
||||
@@ -133,6 +134,9 @@ Because these extensions are not typically used in normal operations, you should
|
||||
| 90.0 | 100 | 90 | File writes $file_name$ with extensions consistent with a SamSam ransomware attack seen on $dest$ |
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
> :information_source:
|
||||
> The Risk Score is calculated by the following formula: Risk Score = (Impact * Confidence/100). Initial Confidence and Impact is set by the analytic author.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Reference
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Some files were not shown because too many files have changed in this diff Show More
Reference in New Issue
Block a user