mirror of
https://github.com/splunk/security_content
synced 2026-06-08 17:32:49 +00:00
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ tags:
|
||||
analytic_story:
|
||||
- Windows Defense Evasion Tactics
|
||||
- Windows Registry Abuse
|
||||
- NjRAT
|
||||
asset_type: Endpoint
|
||||
confidence: 100
|
||||
impact: 40
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ tags:
|
||||
analytic_story:
|
||||
- Windows Defense Evasion Tactics
|
||||
- Windows Registry Abuse
|
||||
- NjRAT
|
||||
asset_type: Endpoint
|
||||
confidence: 50
|
||||
impact: 50
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ tags:
|
||||
analytic_story:
|
||||
- Windows Defense Evasion Tactics
|
||||
- Windows Registry Abuse
|
||||
- NjRAT
|
||||
asset_type: Endpoint
|
||||
confidence: 70
|
||||
impact: 70
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ tags:
|
||||
analytic_story:
|
||||
- Windows Defense Evasion Tactics
|
||||
- Windows Registry Abuse
|
||||
- NjRAT
|
||||
asset_type: Endpoint
|
||||
confidence: 60
|
||||
impact: 70
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
|
||||
name: Windows Abused Web Services
|
||||
id: 01f0aef4-8591-4daa-a53d-0ed49823b681
|
||||
version: 1
|
||||
date: '2023-09-20'
|
||||
author: Teoderick Contreras, Splunk
|
||||
status: production
|
||||
type: TTP
|
||||
data_source:
|
||||
- Sysmon Event ID 22
|
||||
description: This analytic detects a suspicious process making a DNS query via known,
|
||||
abused text-paste web services, VoIP, internet via secure tunneling,instant messaging, and digital distribution
|
||||
platforms used to download external files. This technique is abused by adversaries,
|
||||
malware actors, and red teams to download a malicious file on the target host. This
|
||||
is a good TTP indicator for possible initial access techniques. A user will experience
|
||||
false positives if the following instant messaging is allowed or common applications
|
||||
like telegram or discord are allowed in the corporate network.
|
||||
search: '`sysmon` EventCode=22 QueryName IN ("*pastebin*",""*textbin*"", "*ngrok.io*", "*discord*", "*duckdns.org*", "*pasteio.com*")
|
||||
| stats count min(_time) as firstTime max(_time) as lastTime by Image QueryName QueryStatus process_name QueryResults Computer
|
||||
| rename Computer as dest
|
||||
| `security_content_ctime(firstTime)`
|
||||
| `security_content_ctime(lastTime)`
|
||||
| `windows_abused_web_services_filter`'
|
||||
how_to_implement: This detection relies on sysmon logs with the Event ID 22, DNS Query.
|
||||
We suggest you run this detection at least once a day over the last 14 days.
|
||||
known_false_positives: Noise and false positive can be seen if the following instant
|
||||
messaging is allowed to use within corporate network. In this case, a filter is
|
||||
needed.
|
||||
references:
|
||||
- https://malpedia.caad.fkie.fraunhofer.de/details/win.njrat
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
analytic_story:
|
||||
- NjRAT
|
||||
asset_type: Endpoint
|
||||
confidence: 60
|
||||
impact: 60
|
||||
message: a network connection on known abused web services from $dest$
|
||||
mitre_attack_id:
|
||||
- T1102
|
||||
observable:
|
||||
- name: dest
|
||||
type: Hostname
|
||||
role:
|
||||
- Victim
|
||||
- name: process_name
|
||||
type: Process
|
||||
role:
|
||||
- Attacker
|
||||
product:
|
||||
- Splunk Enterprise
|
||||
- Splunk Enterprise Security
|
||||
- Splunk Cloud
|
||||
risk_score: 36
|
||||
required_fields:
|
||||
- _time
|
||||
- Image
|
||||
- QueryName
|
||||
- QueryStatus
|
||||
- process_name
|
||||
- QueryResults
|
||||
- Computer
|
||||
security_domain: endpoint
|
||||
tests:
|
||||
- name: True Positive Test
|
||||
attack_data:
|
||||
- data: https://media.githubusercontent.com/media/splunk/attack_data/master/datasets/attack_techniques/T1102/njrat_ngrok_connection/ngrok.log
|
||||
source: XmlWinEventLog:Microsoft-Windows-Sysmon/Operational
|
||||
sourcetype: xmlwineventlog
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
|
||||
name: Windows Admin Permission Discovery
|
||||
id: e08620cb-9488-4052-832d-97bcc0afd414
|
||||
version: 1
|
||||
date: '2023-09-19'
|
||||
author: Teoderick Contreras, Splunk
|
||||
status: production
|
||||
type: Anomaly
|
||||
data_source:
|
||||
- Sysmon EventID 11
|
||||
description: This analytic is developed to identify suspicious file creation in the root drive (C:\).
|
||||
This tactic was observed in NjRAT as a means to ascertain whether its malware instance running on
|
||||
the compromised host possesses administrative privileges.
|
||||
The methodology involves an attempt to create a 'win.dat' file in the C:\ directory.
|
||||
If this file is successfully created, it serves as an indicator that the process indeed holds administrative privileges.
|
||||
This anomaly detection mechanism serves as a valuable pivot point for detecting NjRAT and other malware strains employing
|
||||
similar techniques to assess the privileges of their running malware instances, without using token privilege API calls or PowerShell commandlets.
|
||||
search: '|tstats `security_content_summariesonly` count min(_time) as firstTime max(_time) as lastTime from datamodel=Endpoint.Filesystem
|
||||
where Filesystem.file_name IN ("*.exe", "*.dll", "*.sys", "*.com", "*.vbs", "*.vbe", "*.js", "*.bat", "*.cmd", "*.pif", "*.lnk", "*.dat")
|
||||
by Filesystem.dest Filesystem.file_create_time Filesystem.process_id Filesystem.process_guiid Filesystem.file_name Filesystem.file_path Filesystem.user
|
||||
| `drop_dm_object_name(Filesystem)`
|
||||
| eval dropped_file_path = split(file_path, "\\")
|
||||
| eval dropped_file_path_split_count = mvcount(dropped_file_path)
|
||||
| eval root_drive = mvindex(dropped_file_path,0) | where LIKE(root_drive, "C:") AND dropped_file_path_split_count = 2
|
||||
| `security_content_ctime(firstTime)`
|
||||
| `security_content_ctime(lastTime)`
|
||||
| `windows_admin_permission_discovery_filter`'
|
||||
how_to_implement: To successfully implement this search you need to be ingesting information on process that
|
||||
include the name of the Filesystem responsible for the changes from your endpoints into the `Endpoint` datamodel in the `Filesystem` node.
|
||||
known_false_positives: administrator is capable of dropping files in root C drive.
|
||||
references:
|
||||
- https://malpedia.caad.fkie.fraunhofer.de/details/win.njrat
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
analytic_story:
|
||||
- NjRAT
|
||||
asset_type: Endpoint
|
||||
confidence: 50
|
||||
impact: 50
|
||||
message: A file was created in root drive C:/ on host - $dest$
|
||||
mitre_attack_id:
|
||||
- T1069.001
|
||||
observable:
|
||||
- name: user
|
||||
type: User
|
||||
role:
|
||||
- Victim
|
||||
- name: process_id
|
||||
type: Process
|
||||
role:
|
||||
- Attacker
|
||||
- name: file_name
|
||||
type: File Name
|
||||
role:
|
||||
- Other
|
||||
- Attacker
|
||||
product:
|
||||
- Splunk Enterprise
|
||||
- Splunk Enterprise Security
|
||||
- Splunk Cloud
|
||||
risk_score: 25
|
||||
required_fields:
|
||||
- _time
|
||||
- Filesystem.file_path
|
||||
- Filesystem.file_create_time
|
||||
- Filesystem.process_id
|
||||
- Filesystem.file_name
|
||||
- Filesystem.user
|
||||
security_domain: endpoint
|
||||
tests:
|
||||
- name: True Positive Test
|
||||
attack_data:
|
||||
- data: https://media.githubusercontent.com/media/splunk/attack_data/master/datasets/attack_techniques/T1069.001/njrat_admin_check/win_dat.log
|
||||
source: XmlWinEventLog:Microsoft-Windows-Sysmon/Operational
|
||||
sourcetype: xmlwineventlog
|
||||
update_timestamp: true
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
|
||||
name: Windows Delete or Modify System Firewall
|
||||
id: b188d11a-eba7-419d-b8b6-cc265b4f2c4f
|
||||
version: 1
|
||||
date: '2023-09-08'
|
||||
author: Teoderick Contreras, Splunk
|
||||
status: production
|
||||
type: Anomaly
|
||||
data_source:
|
||||
- Sysmon Event ID 1
|
||||
description: This analytic identifies potentially malicious 'netsh' processes that manipulate firewall configurations.
|
||||
This behavior has been observed in the NJRAT malware, which deletes its added firewall rules as part of its cleanup process.
|
||||
Leveraging this anomaly detection can be a valuable approach for detecting malware, such as NJRAT,
|
||||
that makes alterations to firewall configurations as a component of its malicious activities.
|
||||
search: '| tstats `security_content_summariesonly` count min(_time) as firstTime max(_time) as lastTime from datamodel=Endpoint.Processes
|
||||
where `process_netsh` Processes.process = "* firewall *" Processes.process = "* delete *"
|
||||
by Processes.parent_process Processes.parent_process_name Processes.process_name Processes.process_id Processes.process_guid Processes.process Processes.user Processes.dest
|
||||
| `drop_dm_object_name("Processes")`
|
||||
| `security_content_ctime(firstTime)`
|
||||
| `security_content_ctime(lastTime)`
|
||||
| `windows_delete_or_modify_system_firewall_filter`'
|
||||
how_to_implement: The detection is based on data that originates from Endpoint Detection
|
||||
and Response (EDR) agents. These agents are designed to provide security-related
|
||||
telemetry from the endpoints where the agent is installed. To implement this search,
|
||||
you must ingest logs that contain the process GUID, process name, and parent process.
|
||||
Additionally, you must ingest complete command-line executions. These logs must
|
||||
be processed using the appropriate Splunk Technology Add-ons that are specific to
|
||||
the EDR product. The logs must also be mapped to the `Processes` node of the `Endpoint`
|
||||
data model. Use the Splunk Common Information Model (CIM) to normalize the field
|
||||
names and speed up the data modeling process.
|
||||
known_false_positives: Administrator may modify or delete firewall configuration.
|
||||
references:
|
||||
- https://malpedia.caad.fkie.fraunhofer.de/details/win.njrat
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
analytic_story:
|
||||
- NjRAT
|
||||
asset_type: Endpoint
|
||||
confidence: 60
|
||||
impact: 60
|
||||
message: A $process_name$ deleted a firewall configuration on $dest$
|
||||
mitre_attack_id:
|
||||
- T1562
|
||||
- T1562.004
|
||||
observable:
|
||||
- name: dest
|
||||
type: Endpoint
|
||||
role:
|
||||
- Victim
|
||||
product:
|
||||
- Splunk Enterprise
|
||||
- Splunk Enterprise Security
|
||||
- Splunk Cloud
|
||||
risk_score: 36
|
||||
required_fields:
|
||||
- _time
|
||||
- Processes.dest
|
||||
- Processes.user
|
||||
- Processes.parent_process_name
|
||||
- Processes.parent_process
|
||||
- Processes.process_name
|
||||
- Processes.process
|
||||
- Processes.process_id
|
||||
- Processes.parent_process_id
|
||||
security_domain: endpoint
|
||||
tests:
|
||||
- name: True Positive Test
|
||||
attack_data:
|
||||
- data: https://media.githubusercontent.com/media/splunk/attack_data/master/datasets/attack_techniques/T1562.004/njrat_delete_firewall/njrat_delete_firewall.log
|
||||
source: XmlWinEventLog:Microsoft-Windows-Sysmon/Operational
|
||||
sourcetype: xmlwineventlog
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
|
||||
name: Windows Disable or Modify Tools Via Taskkill
|
||||
id: a43ae66f-c410-4b3d-8741-9ce1ad17ddb0
|
||||
version: 1
|
||||
date: '2023-09-13'
|
||||
author: Teoderick Contreras, Splunk
|
||||
status: production
|
||||
type: Anomaly
|
||||
data_source:
|
||||
- Sysmon Event ID 1
|
||||
description: This analytic is designed to identify potentially malicious processes that terminate other processes using taskkill.exe.
|
||||
This technique has been observed in various malware instances, employed by adversaries and red teamers alike, to forcibly terminate
|
||||
other processes whether they be security products or other legitimate applications as part of their malicious activities.
|
||||
Detecting this anomaly serves as a valuable alert mechanism to identify suspicious processes or malware attempting to evade detection and disrupt system stability.
|
||||
search: '| tstats `security_content_summariesonly` count min(_time) as firstTime max(_time) as lastTime from datamodel=Endpoint.Processes
|
||||
where Processes.process_name = "taskkill.exe" Processes.process IN ("* /f*", "* /t*") Processes.process IN ("* /im*", "* /pid*")
|
||||
by Processes.parent_process_name Processes.parent_process Processes.process_name Processes.process Processes.process_id Processes.process_guid Processes.user Processes.dest
|
||||
| `drop_dm_object_name("Processes")`
|
||||
| `security_content_ctime(firstTime)`
|
||||
| `security_content_ctime(lastTime)`
|
||||
| `windows_disable_or_modify_tools_via_taskkill_filter`'
|
||||
how_to_implement: The detection is based on data that originates from Endpoint Detection
|
||||
and Response (EDR) agents. These agents are designed to provide security-related
|
||||
telemetry from the endpoints where the agent is installed. To implement this search,
|
||||
you must ingest logs that contain the process GUID, process name, and parent process.
|
||||
Additionally, you must ingest complete command-line executions. These logs must
|
||||
be processed using the appropriate Splunk Technology Add-ons that are specific to
|
||||
the EDR product. The logs must also be mapped to the `Processes` node of the `Endpoint`
|
||||
data model. Use the Splunk Common Information Model (CIM) to normalize the field
|
||||
names and speed up the data modeling process.
|
||||
known_false_positives: Network administrator can use this application to kill process during audit or investigation.
|
||||
references:
|
||||
- https://malpedia.caad.fkie.fraunhofer.de/details/win.njrat
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
analytic_story:
|
||||
- NjRAT
|
||||
asset_type: Endpoint
|
||||
confidence: 60
|
||||
impact: 60
|
||||
message: A taskkill process to terminate process is executed on host- $dest$
|
||||
mitre_attack_id:
|
||||
- T1562
|
||||
- T1562.001
|
||||
observable:
|
||||
- name: dest
|
||||
type: Endpoint
|
||||
role:
|
||||
- Victim
|
||||
- name: dest
|
||||
type: Endpoint
|
||||
role:
|
||||
- Victim
|
||||
- name: parent_process_name
|
||||
type: Process Name
|
||||
role:
|
||||
- Parent Process
|
||||
- Attacker
|
||||
product:
|
||||
- Splunk Enterprise
|
||||
- Splunk Enterprise Security
|
||||
- Splunk Cloud
|
||||
risk_score: 36
|
||||
required_fields:
|
||||
- _time
|
||||
- Processes.dest
|
||||
- Processes.user
|
||||
- Processes.parent_process_name
|
||||
- Processes.parent_process
|
||||
- Processes.process_name
|
||||
- Processes.process
|
||||
- Processes.process_id
|
||||
- Processes.parent_process_id
|
||||
security_domain: endpoint
|
||||
tests:
|
||||
- name: True Positive Test
|
||||
attack_data:
|
||||
- data: https://media.githubusercontent.com/media/splunk/attack_data/master/datasets/attack_techniques/T1562.001/taskkill/taskkill_im.log
|
||||
source: XmlWinEventLog:Microsoft-Windows-Sysmon/Operational
|
||||
sourcetype: xmlwineventlog
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
|
||||
name: Windows Executable in Loaded Modules
|
||||
id: 3e27af56-fcf0-4113-988d-24969b062be7
|
||||
version: 1
|
||||
date: '2023-09-12'
|
||||
author: Teoderick Contreras, Splunk
|
||||
status: production
|
||||
type: TTP
|
||||
data_source:
|
||||
- Sysmon Event ID 7
|
||||
description: This analytic identifies potentially malicious 'ImageLoaded' events, particularly when they involve executable files.
|
||||
This behavior was observed in NjRAT instances, where, during each instance of loading a module from its C2 server onto the compromised host,
|
||||
Sysmon recorded the path of the actual Image or Process as an 'ImageLoaded' event, rather than the typical tracking of dynamically loaded DLL modules in memory.
|
||||
This event holds significance because it tracks processes that load modules and libraries, which are typically in the .dll format rather than .exe.
|
||||
Leveraging this 'Time-To-Perform' (TTP) detection method can prove invaluable for the identification of NjRAT malware or
|
||||
other malicious software instances that introduce executable files as modules within a targeted host.
|
||||
search: '`sysmon` EventCode=7 ImageLoaded= *.exe
|
||||
| stats count min(_time) as firstTime max(_time) as lastTime by Image ImageLoaded Signed SignatureStatus OriginalFileName process_name Computer EventCode ProcessId Hashes IMPHASH
|
||||
| rename Computer as dest
|
||||
| `security_content_ctime(firstTime)`
|
||||
| `security_content_ctime(lastTime)`
|
||||
| `windows_executable_in_loaded_modules_filter`'
|
||||
how_to_implement: To successfully implement this search, you need to be ingesting logs with the process name and imageloaded executions from your endpoints.
|
||||
If you are using Sysmon, you must have at least version 6.0.4 of the Sysmon TA.
|
||||
known_false_positives: unknown.
|
||||
references:
|
||||
- https://malpedia.caad.fkie.fraunhofer.de/details/win.njrat
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
analytic_story:
|
||||
- NjRAT
|
||||
asset_type: Endpoint
|
||||
confidence: 80
|
||||
impact: 80
|
||||
message: An executable $Imageloaded$ loaded by $Image$ on $dest$
|
||||
mitre_attack_id:
|
||||
- T1129
|
||||
observable:
|
||||
- name: dest
|
||||
type: Endpoint
|
||||
role:
|
||||
- Victim
|
||||
product:
|
||||
- Splunk Enterprise
|
||||
- Splunk Enterprise Security
|
||||
- Splunk Cloud
|
||||
risk_score: 64
|
||||
required_fields:
|
||||
- _time
|
||||
- Image
|
||||
- ImageLoaded
|
||||
- Signed
|
||||
- SignatureStatus
|
||||
- OriginalFileName
|
||||
- process_name
|
||||
- Computer
|
||||
- EventCode
|
||||
- ProcessId
|
||||
- Hashes
|
||||
- IMPHASH
|
||||
security_domain: endpoint
|
||||
tests:
|
||||
- name: True Positive Test
|
||||
attack_data:
|
||||
- data: https://media.githubusercontent.com/media/splunk/attack_data/master/datasets/attack_techniques/T1129/executable_shared_modules/image_loaded_exe.log
|
||||
source: XmlWinEventLog:Microsoft-Windows-Sysmon/Operational
|
||||
sourcetype: xmlwineventlog
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
|
||||
name: Windows Njrat Fileless Storage via Registry
|
||||
id: a5fffbbd-271f-4980-94ed-4fbf17f0af1c
|
||||
version: 1
|
||||
date: '2023-09-14'
|
||||
author: Teoderick Contreras, Splunk
|
||||
status: production
|
||||
type: TTP
|
||||
data_source:
|
||||
- Sysmon EventID 12
|
||||
- Sysmon EventID 13
|
||||
- Sysmon EventID 14
|
||||
description: The following analytic identifies a suspicious registry modification associated with NjRat,
|
||||
a telltale sign of its fileless technique. NjRat employs this method to manage its keylogs and execute downloaded DLL module plugins discreetly on the compromised host.
|
||||
This approach is particularly effective at evading conventional file-based detection systems, as it stores indicators of compromise (IOCs) in the registry.
|
||||
Leveraging this TTP (Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures) detection can significantly enhance the identification of NjRAT infections.
|
||||
search: '| tstats `security_content_summariesonly` count min(_time) as firstTime max(_time) as lastTime from datamodel=Endpoint.Registry
|
||||
where Registry.registry_path="*\\[kl]" OR Registry.registry_value_data IN ("*[ENTER]*", "*[TAP]*", "*[Back]*")
|
||||
by Registry.dest Registry.user Registry.registry_path Registry.registry_value_data Registry.registry_key_name Registry.registry_value_name
|
||||
| `drop_dm_object_name(Registry)`
|
||||
| `security_content_ctime(lastTime)`
|
||||
| `security_content_ctime(firstTime)`
|
||||
| `windows_njrat_fileless_storage_via_registry_filter`'
|
||||
how_to_implement: To successfully implement this search you need to be ingesting information
|
||||
on process that include the name of the process responsible for the changes from
|
||||
your endpoints into the `Endpoint` datamodel in the `Processes` node. In addition,
|
||||
confirm the latest CIM App 4.20 or higher is installed and the latest TA for the
|
||||
endpoint product.
|
||||
known_false_positives: unknown
|
||||
references:
|
||||
- https://malpedia.caad.fkie.fraunhofer.de/details/win.njrat
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
analytic_story:
|
||||
- NjRAT
|
||||
asset_type: Endpoint
|
||||
confidence: 100
|
||||
impact: 100
|
||||
message: a suspicious registry entry related to NjRAT keylloging registry in $dest$
|
||||
mitre_attack_id:
|
||||
- T1027.011
|
||||
- T1027
|
||||
observable:
|
||||
- name: dest
|
||||
type: Endpoint
|
||||
role:
|
||||
- Victim
|
||||
product:
|
||||
- Splunk Enterprise
|
||||
- Splunk Enterprise Security
|
||||
- Splunk Cloud
|
||||
risk_score: 100
|
||||
required_fields:
|
||||
- _time
|
||||
- Registry.registry_key_name
|
||||
- Registry.registry_path
|
||||
- Registry.user
|
||||
- Registry.dest
|
||||
- Registry.registry_value_name
|
||||
- Registry.action
|
||||
- Registry.registry_value_data
|
||||
security_domain: endpoint
|
||||
tests:
|
||||
- name: True Positive Test
|
||||
attack_data:
|
||||
- data: https://media.githubusercontent.com/media/splunk/attack_data/master/datasets/attack_techniques/T1027.011/njrat_fileless_registry_entry/njrat_registry.log
|
||||
source: XmlWinEventLog:Microsoft-Windows-Sysmon/Operational
|
||||
sourcetype: xmlwineventlog
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
|
||||
name: Windows Modify Registry With MD5 Reg Key Name
|
||||
id: 4662c6b1-0754-455e-b9ff-3ee730af3ba8
|
||||
version: 1
|
||||
date: '2023-09-25'
|
||||
author: Teoderick Contreras, Splunk
|
||||
status: production
|
||||
type: TTP
|
||||
data_source:
|
||||
- Sysmon EventID 12
|
||||
- Sysmon EventID 13
|
||||
- Sysmon EventID 14
|
||||
description: This analytic is designed to identify potentially malicious registry modification characterized by MD5-like registry key names.
|
||||
This technique has been notably observed in NjRAT malware, which employs such registries for fileless storage of keylogs and .DLL plugins.
|
||||
Detecting this tactic serves as an effective means of identifying possible NjRAT malware instances that create or modify registries as
|
||||
part of their malicious activities.
|
||||
search: '| tstats `security_content_summariesonly` count min(_time) as firstTime max(_time) as lastTime from datamodel=Endpoint.Registry
|
||||
where Registry.registry_path = "*\\SOFTWARE\\*" Registry.registry_value_data = "Binary Data"
|
||||
by Registry.dest Registry.user Registry.registry_path Registry.registry_value_name Registry.registry_value_data Registry.registry_key_name
|
||||
| `drop_dm_object_name(Registry)`
|
||||
| eval dropped_reg_path = split(registry_path, "\\")
|
||||
| eval dropped_reg_path_split_count = mvcount(dropped_reg_path)
|
||||
| eval validation_result= if(match(registry_value_name,"^[0-9a-fA-F]{32}$"),"md5","nonmd5")
|
||||
| where validation_result = "md5" AND dropped_reg_path_split_count <= 5
|
||||
| table dest user registry_path registry_value_name registry_value_data registry_key_name reg_key_name dropped_reg_path_split_count validation_result
|
||||
| `security_content_ctime(lastTime)`
|
||||
| `security_content_ctime(firstTime)`
|
||||
| `windows_modify_registry_with_md5_reg_key_name_filter`'
|
||||
how_to_implement: To successfully implement this search you need to be ingesting information on process that
|
||||
include the name of the Filesystem responsible for the changes from your endpoints into the `Endpoint` datamodel in the `Filesystem` node.
|
||||
known_false_positives: unknown
|
||||
references:
|
||||
- https://malpedia.caad.fkie.fraunhofer.de/details/win.njrat
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
analytic_story:
|
||||
- NjRAT
|
||||
asset_type: Endpoint
|
||||
confidence: 60
|
||||
impact: 60
|
||||
message: A md5 registry value name $registry_value_name$ is created on $dest$
|
||||
mitre_attack_id:
|
||||
- T1112
|
||||
observable:
|
||||
- name: dest
|
||||
type: Endpoint
|
||||
role:
|
||||
- Victim
|
||||
product:
|
||||
- Splunk Enterprise
|
||||
- Splunk Enterprise Security
|
||||
- Splunk Cloud
|
||||
risk_score: 36
|
||||
required_fields:
|
||||
- _time
|
||||
- Registry.registry_key_name
|
||||
- Registry.registry_path
|
||||
- Registry.user
|
||||
- Registry.dest
|
||||
- Registry.registry_value_name
|
||||
- Registry.action
|
||||
- Registry.registry_value_data
|
||||
security_domain: endpoint
|
||||
tests:
|
||||
- name: True Positive Test
|
||||
attack_data:
|
||||
- data: https://media.githubusercontent.com/media/splunk/attack_data/master/datasets/attack_techniques/T1112/njrat_md5_registry_entry/njrat_reg_binary.log
|
||||
source: XmlWinEventLog:Microsoft-Windows-Sysmon/Operational
|
||||
sourcetype: xmlwineventlog
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
|
||||
name: Windows Time Based Evasion
|
||||
id: 34502357-deb1-499a-8261-ffe144abf561
|
||||
version: 1
|
||||
date: '2023-09-08'
|
||||
author: Teoderick Contreras, Splunk
|
||||
status: production
|
||||
type: TTP
|
||||
data_source:
|
||||
- Sysmon Event ID 1
|
||||
description: This analytic is designed to detect potentially malicious processes that initiate a ping delay using an invalid IP address.
|
||||
This evasion technique was observed in NJRAT, where the malware employed ping commands as a means to introduce a time delay before self-deletion on the compromised host.
|
||||
Identifying this (TTP) behavior can serve as a valuable indicator for detecting NJRAT infections or other malware that employ time delays as
|
||||
evasion tactics.
|
||||
search: '| tstats `security_content_summariesonly` count min(_time) as firstTime max(_time) as lastTime from datamodel=Endpoint.Processes
|
||||
where Processes.process_name = "ping.exe" Processes.parent_process = "* ping 0 -n *" OR Processes.process = "* ping 0 -n *"
|
||||
by Processes.parent_process Processes.process_name Processes.process_id Processes.process_guid Processes.process Processes.user Processes.dest
|
||||
| `drop_dm_object_name("Processes")`
|
||||
| `security_content_ctime(firstTime)`
|
||||
| `security_content_ctime(lastTime)`
|
||||
| `windows_time_based_evasion_filter`'
|
||||
how_to_implement: The detection is based on data that originates from Endpoint Detection
|
||||
and Response (EDR) agents. These agents are designed to provide security-related
|
||||
telemetry from the endpoints where the agent is installed. To implement this search,
|
||||
you must ingest logs that contain the process GUID, process name, and parent process.
|
||||
Additionally, you must ingest complete command-line executions. These logs must
|
||||
be processed using the appropriate Splunk Technology Add-ons that are specific to
|
||||
the EDR product. The logs must also be mapped to the `Processes` node of the `Endpoint`
|
||||
data model. Use the Splunk Common Information Model (CIM) to normalize the field
|
||||
names and speed up the data modeling process.
|
||||
known_false_positives: unknown
|
||||
references:
|
||||
- https://malpedia.caad.fkie.fraunhofer.de/details/win.njrat
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
analytic_story:
|
||||
- NjRAT
|
||||
asset_type: Endpoint
|
||||
confidence: 60
|
||||
impact: 60
|
||||
message: A $process_name$ did a suspicious ping to invalid IP address on $dest$
|
||||
mitre_attack_id:
|
||||
- T1497
|
||||
- T1497.003
|
||||
observable:
|
||||
- name: dest
|
||||
type: Endpoint
|
||||
role:
|
||||
- Victim
|
||||
product:
|
||||
- Splunk Enterprise
|
||||
- Splunk Enterprise Security
|
||||
- Splunk Cloud
|
||||
risk_score: 36
|
||||
required_fields:
|
||||
- _time
|
||||
- Processes.dest
|
||||
- Processes.user
|
||||
- Processes.parent_process_name
|
||||
- Processes.parent_process
|
||||
- Processes.process_name
|
||||
- Processes.process
|
||||
- Processes.process_id
|
||||
- Processes.parent_process_id
|
||||
security_domain: endpoint
|
||||
tests:
|
||||
- name: True Positive Test
|
||||
attack_data:
|
||||
- data: https://media.githubusercontent.com/media/splunk/attack_data/master/datasets/attack_techniques/T1497.003/njrat_ping_delay_before_delete/ping_0.log
|
||||
source: XmlWinEventLog:Microsoft-Windows-Sysmon/Operational
|
||||
sourcetype: xmlwineventlog
|
||||
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ references:
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
analytic_story:
|
||||
- Chaos Ransomware
|
||||
- NjRAT
|
||||
asset_type: Endpoint
|
||||
confidence: 80
|
||||
impact: 80
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user