mirror of
https://github.com/splunk/security_content
synced 2026-06-08 17:32:49 +00:00
Merge branch 'T1059' of https://github.com/splunk/security_content into T1059
This commit is contained in:
@@ -6,23 +6,30 @@ author: Michael Haag, Splunk
|
||||
type: TTP
|
||||
datamodel:
|
||||
- Endpoint
|
||||
description: The following analytic identifies the use of the Windows Disk Image Utility, `dism.exe`, to remove Windows Defender. Adversaries may use `dism.exe` to disable Defender before completing their objective.
|
||||
description: The following analytic identifies the use of the Windows Disk Image Utility,
|
||||
`dism.exe`, to remove Windows Defender. Adversaries may use `dism.exe` to disable
|
||||
Defender before completing their objective.
|
||||
search: '| tstats `security_content_summariesonly` count min(_time) as firstTime max(_time)
|
||||
as lastTime from datamodel=Endpoint.Processes where Processes.process_name=dism.exe
|
||||
(Processes.process="*/online*" AND Processes.process="*/disable-feature*" AND Processes.process="*Windows-Defender*" AND Processes.process="*/remove*") by Processes.dest Processes.user Processes.parent_process_name Processes.process_name Processes.original_file_name
|
||||
Processes.process Processes.process_id Processes.parent_process_id
|
||||
| `drop_dm_object_name(Processes)`
|
||||
| `security_content_ctime(firstTime)`
|
||||
| `security_content_ctime(lastTime)`
|
||||
| `windows_dism_remove_defender_filter`'
|
||||
how_to_implement: To successfully implement this search you need to be ingesting information on process that include the name of the process responsible for the changes from your endpoints into the `Endpoint` datamodel in the `Processes` node. In addition, confirm the latest CIM App 4.20 or higher is installed and the latest TA for the endpoint product.
|
||||
known_false_positives: Some legitimate administrative tools leverage `dism.exe` to manipulate packages and features of the operating system. Filter as needed.
|
||||
(Processes.process="*/online*" AND Processes.process="*/disable-feature*" AND Processes.process="*Windows-Defender*"
|
||||
AND Processes.process="*/remove*") by Processes.dest Processes.user Processes.parent_process_name
|
||||
Processes.process_name Processes.original_file_name Processes.process Processes.process_id
|
||||
Processes.parent_process_id | `drop_dm_object_name(Processes)` | `security_content_ctime(firstTime)`
|
||||
| `security_content_ctime(lastTime)` | `windows_dism_remove_defender_filter`'
|
||||
how_to_implement: To successfully implement this search you need to be ingesting information
|
||||
on process that include the name of the process responsible for the changes from
|
||||
your endpoints into the `Endpoint` datamodel in the `Processes` node. In addition,
|
||||
confirm the latest CIM App 4.20 or higher is installed and the latest TA for the
|
||||
endpoint product.
|
||||
known_false_positives: Some legitimate administrative tools leverage `dism.exe` to
|
||||
manipulate packages and features of the operating system. Filter as needed.
|
||||
references:
|
||||
- https://thedfirreport.com/2020/11/23/pysa-mespinoza-ransomware/
|
||||
- https://thedfirreport.com/2020/11/23/pysa-mespinoza-ransomware/
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
analytic_story:
|
||||
- Windows Defense Evasion Tactics
|
||||
dataset: []
|
||||
dataset:
|
||||
- https://media.githubusercontent.com/media/splunk/attack_data/master/datasets/attack_techniques/T1562.001/atomic_red_team/windows-sysmon_dism.log
|
||||
kill_chain_phases:
|
||||
- Exploitation
|
||||
mitre_attack_id:
|
||||
@@ -36,11 +43,11 @@ tags:
|
||||
- _time
|
||||
- Processes.dest
|
||||
- Processes.user
|
||||
- Processes.parent_process_name #parent process name
|
||||
- Processes.parent_process #parent cmdline
|
||||
- Processes.parent_process_name
|
||||
- Processes.parent_process
|
||||
- Processes.original_file_name
|
||||
- Processes.process_name #process name
|
||||
- Processes.process #process cmdline
|
||||
- Processes.process_name
|
||||
- Processes.process
|
||||
- Processes.process_id
|
||||
- Processes.parent_process_path
|
||||
- Processes.process_path
|
||||
@@ -48,12 +55,12 @@ tags:
|
||||
security_domain: access
|
||||
impact: 80
|
||||
confidence: 100
|
||||
# (impact * confidence)/100
|
||||
risk_score: 80
|
||||
context:
|
||||
- Source:Endpoint
|
||||
- Stage:Defense Evasion
|
||||
message: An instance of $parent_process_name$ spawning $process_name$ was identified on endpoint $dest$ by user $user$ attempting to disable Windows Defender.
|
||||
message: An instance of $parent_process_name$ spawning $process_name$ was identified
|
||||
on endpoint $dest$ by user $user$ attempting to disable Windows Defender.
|
||||
observable:
|
||||
- name: user
|
||||
type: User
|
||||
@@ -71,4 +78,4 @@ tags:
|
||||
type: Process
|
||||
role:
|
||||
- Child Process
|
||||
|
||||
automated_detection_testing: passed
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user