mirror of
https://github.com/splunk/security_content
synced 2026-06-08 17:32:49 +00:00
Some fixes
This commit is contained in:
@@ -7,9 +7,8 @@ type: Anomaly
|
||||
datamodel:
|
||||
- Endpoint
|
||||
description: The following analytic identifies a suspicious process enabling the "SeDebugPrivilege" privilege token.
|
||||
This technique was being abused by adversaries, threat actors and red-teamers to gain debug privileges on their malware process
|
||||
to be able to access or debug a process to dump credentials or to inject malicious code. This anomaly detection can be a good pivot
|
||||
to catch possible mimikatz, BRC4 or malware elevating their process privileges.
|
||||
SeDebugPrivilege allows a process to inspect and adjust the memory of other processes, and has long been a security concern. SeDebugPrivilege allows the token bearer to access any process or thread, regardless of security descriptors, per Palantir.
|
||||
This technique is abused by adversaries to gain debug privileges with their malicious software to be able to access or debug a process to dump credentials or to inject malicious code.
|
||||
search: '`wineventlog_security` EventCode=4703 EnabledPrivilegeList = "*SeDebugPrivilege*" AND NOT(ProcessName IN ("*\\Program File*", "*\\System32\\lsass.exe*", "*\\SysWOW64\\lsass.exe*", "*\\SysWOW64\\svchost.exe*", "*\\System32\\svchost.exe*"))
|
||||
| stats count min(_time) as firstTime max(_time) as lastTime by ProcessName ProcessId SubjectDomainName SubjectUserName SubjectUserSid TargetUserName TargetLogonId TargetDomainName EnabledPrivilegeList action
|
||||
| `security_content_ctime(firstTime)`
|
||||
@@ -18,10 +17,12 @@ search: '`wineventlog_security` EventCode=4703 EnabledPrivilegeList = "*SeDebugP
|
||||
how_to_implement: To successfully implement this search, you need to be ingesting
|
||||
Windows Security Event Logs with 4703 EventCode enabled. The Windows TA is also
|
||||
required.
|
||||
known_false_positives: we've seen normal process in system32 folder path and browser application doing this technique.
|
||||
Filter as needed.
|
||||
known_false_positives: Some native binaries and browser applications may request SeDebugPrivilege. Filter as needed.
|
||||
references:
|
||||
- https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/security/threat-protection/auditing/event-4703
|
||||
- https://devblogs.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/20080314-00/?p=23113
|
||||
- https://blog.palantir.com/windows-privilege-abuse-auditing-detection-and-defense-3078a403d74e
|
||||
- https://atomicredteam.io/privilege-escalation/T1134.001/#atomic-test-2---%60sedebugprivilege%60-token-duplication
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
analytic_story:
|
||||
- Brute Ratel C4
|
||||
@@ -39,7 +40,7 @@ tags:
|
||||
impact: 60
|
||||
kill_chain_phases:
|
||||
- Exploitation
|
||||
message: a process $Process_Name$ adjust its privileges with SeDebugPrivilege in $Computer$
|
||||
message: A process $ProcessName$ adjust its privileges with SeDebugPrivilege on $ComputerName$.
|
||||
mitre_attack_id:
|
||||
- T1134.002
|
||||
- T1134
|
||||
@@ -56,7 +57,7 @@ tags:
|
||||
- Splunk Cloud
|
||||
required_fields:
|
||||
- _time
|
||||
- Process_Name
|
||||
- ProcessName
|
||||
- Security_ID
|
||||
- action
|
||||
- result
|
||||
|
||||
+13
-12
@@ -4,11 +4,9 @@ version: 1
|
||||
date: '2022-08-24'
|
||||
author: Teoderick Contreras, Splunk
|
||||
type: Hunting
|
||||
datamodel:
|
||||
- Endpoint
|
||||
description: The following analytic identifies a process access in winlogon.exe to duplicate its handle.
|
||||
This technique was seen in several adversaries, threat actors and even red teams to gain privileges to their process.
|
||||
This duplicate handle access technique, may refer to a malicious process duplicating the process token of winlogon.exe and using it to a new process instance.
|
||||
datamodel: []
|
||||
description: The following analytic identifies a process requesting access to winlogon.exe attempting to duplicate its handle.
|
||||
This technique was seen in several adversaries to gain privileges for their process.
|
||||
Winlogon.exe is the common targeted process of this technique because it contains high privileges and security tokens.
|
||||
search: '`sysmon` EventCode=10 TargetImage IN("*\\system32\\winlogon.exe*", "*\\SysWOW64\\winlogon.exe*") GrantedAccess = 0x1040
|
||||
| stats count min(_time) as firstTime max(_time) as lastTime
|
||||
@@ -16,12 +14,11 @@ search: '`sysmon` EventCode=10 TargetImage IN("*\\system32\\winlogon.exe*", "*\\
|
||||
| `security_content_ctime(firstTime)`
|
||||
| `security_content_ctime(lastTime)`
|
||||
| `windows_access_token_manipulation_winlogon_duplicate_token_handle_filter`'
|
||||
how_to_implement: To successfully implement this search you need to be ingesting information
|
||||
on process that include the name of the process responsible for the changes from
|
||||
your endpoints into the `Endpoint` datamodel in the `Processes` node. In addition,
|
||||
confirm the latest CIM App 4.20 or higher is installed and the latest TA for the
|
||||
endpoint product.
|
||||
known_false_positives: third party software application may do this technique.
|
||||
how_to_implement: To successfully implement this search, you must be ingesting data
|
||||
that records process activity from your hosts to populate the endpoint data model
|
||||
in the processes node. If you are using Sysmon, you must have at least version 6.0.4
|
||||
of the Sysmon TA.
|
||||
known_false_positives: It is possible legitimate applications will request access to winlogon, filter as needed.
|
||||
references:
|
||||
- https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/api/handleapi/nf-handleapi-duplicatehandle
|
||||
- https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1134/001/
|
||||
@@ -42,7 +39,7 @@ tags:
|
||||
impact: 60
|
||||
kill_chain_phases:
|
||||
- Exploitation
|
||||
message: a process $SourceImage$ is duplicating the handle token of winlogon.exe in $Computer$
|
||||
message: A process $SourceImage$ is duplicating the handle token of winlogon.exe in $Computer$
|
||||
mitre_attack_id:
|
||||
- T1134.001
|
||||
- T1134
|
||||
@@ -53,6 +50,10 @@ tags:
|
||||
type: Endpoint
|
||||
role:
|
||||
- Victim
|
||||
- name: SourceImage
|
||||
type: Process Name
|
||||
role:
|
||||
- Parent Process
|
||||
product:
|
||||
- Splunk Enterprise
|
||||
- Splunk Enterprise Security
|
||||
|
||||
+12
-10
@@ -4,10 +4,9 @@ version: 1
|
||||
date: '2022-08-24'
|
||||
author: Teoderick Contreras, Splunk
|
||||
type: Anomaly
|
||||
datamodel:
|
||||
- Endpoint
|
||||
description: The following analytic identifies a process access in winlogon.exe to duplicate its handle with a non-common or public process source path.
|
||||
This technique was seen in several adversaries, threat actors and even red teams to gain privileges to their process.
|
||||
datamodel: []
|
||||
description: The following analytic identifies a process requesting access in winlogon.exe to duplicate its handle with a non-common or public process source path.
|
||||
This technique was seen where adversaries attempt to gain privileges to their process.
|
||||
This duplicate handle access technique, may refer to a malicious process duplicating the process token of winlogon.exe and using it to a new process instance.
|
||||
Winlogon.exe is the common targeted process of this technique because it contains high privileges and security tokens.
|
||||
search: '`sysmon` EventCode=10 TargetImage IN("*\\system32\\winlogon.exe*", "*\\SysWOW64\\winlogon.exe*") AND GrantedAccess = 0x1040
|
||||
@@ -16,12 +15,11 @@ search: '`sysmon` EventCode=10 TargetImage IN("*\\system32\\winlogon.exe*", "*\
|
||||
| `security_content_ctime(firstTime)`
|
||||
| `security_content_ctime(lastTime)`
|
||||
| `windows_access_token_winlogon_duplicate_handle_in_uncommon_path_filter`'
|
||||
how_to_implement: To successfully implement this search you need to be ingesting information
|
||||
on process that include the name of the process responsible for the changes from
|
||||
your endpoints into the `Endpoint` datamodel in the `Processes` node. In addition,
|
||||
confirm the latest CIM App 4.20 or higher is installed and the latest TA for the
|
||||
endpoint product.
|
||||
known_false_positives: 3rd party software application may do this technique.
|
||||
how_to_implement: To successfully implement this search, you must be ingesting data
|
||||
that records process activity from your hosts to populate the endpoint data model
|
||||
in the processes node. If you are using Sysmon, you must have at least version 6.0.4
|
||||
of the Sysmon TA.
|
||||
known_false_positives: It is possible legitimate applications will request access to winlogon, filter as needed.
|
||||
references:
|
||||
- https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/api/handleapi/nf-handleapi-duplicatehandle
|
||||
- https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1134/001/
|
||||
@@ -53,6 +51,10 @@ tags:
|
||||
type: Endpoint
|
||||
role:
|
||||
- Victim
|
||||
- name: SourceImage
|
||||
type: Process Name
|
||||
role:
|
||||
- Parent Process
|
||||
product:
|
||||
- Splunk Enterprise
|
||||
- Splunk Enterprise Security
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -7,10 +7,9 @@ type: Anomaly
|
||||
datamodel:
|
||||
- Endpoint
|
||||
description: The following analytic identifies a modification to the Transcodedwallpaper file in the wallpaper theme directory
|
||||
to change the wallpaper of the host machine. This technique was seen in adversaries, threat actors and red-teaming tools to deface
|
||||
to change the wallpaper of the host machine. This technique was seen in adversaries attempting to deface
|
||||
or change the desktop wallpaper of the targeted host. During our testing, the common process that affects or changes the wallpaper
|
||||
if a user changes it via desktop personalized setting is explorer.exe. This Anomaly analytic can be a good pivot on a process that
|
||||
is not commonly used to change the wallpaper like ransomware.
|
||||
if a user changes it via desktop personalized setting is explorer.exe.
|
||||
search: '| tstats `security_content_summariesonly` count FROM datamodel=Endpoint.Processes where Processes.process_path !="*\\Windows\\Explorer.EXE"
|
||||
by _time span=1h Processes.process_id Processes.process_name Processes.process Processes.dest Processes.process_guid Processes.original_file_name
|
||||
| `drop_dm_object_name(Processes)`
|
||||
@@ -53,7 +52,7 @@ tags:
|
||||
nist:
|
||||
- DE.CM
|
||||
observable:
|
||||
- name: Computer
|
||||
- name: dest
|
||||
type: Hostname
|
||||
role:
|
||||
- Victim
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -3,23 +3,20 @@ id: 492f09cf-5d60-4d87-99dd-0bc325532dda
|
||||
version: 1
|
||||
date: '2022-08-24'
|
||||
author: Teoderick Contreras, Splunk
|
||||
type: TTP
|
||||
datamodel:
|
||||
- Endpoint
|
||||
description: The following analytic identifies a process creating a remote thread in another process
|
||||
with a public or uncommon installation process file path. This Windows API is commonly used by threat actors, red-teamers and adversaries
|
||||
for process code injection to evade detections or gain privilege escalation.
|
||||
type: Hunting
|
||||
datamodel: []
|
||||
description: The following analytic identifies a process in a non-standard file path on Windows attempting to create a remote thread into a process. This Windows API,CreateRemoteThread, is commonly used by adversaries
|
||||
for process injection to evade detections or gain privilege escalation.
|
||||
search: '`sysmon` EventCode=8 TargetImage = "*.exe" AND NOT(SourceImage IN("C:\\Windows\\*", "C:\\Program File*", "%systemroot%\\*"))
|
||||
| stats count min(_time) as firstTime max(_time) as lastTime by SourceImage TargetImage signature TargetProcessGuid SourceProcessGuid TargetProcessId SourceProcessId StartAddress EventCode Computer
|
||||
| `security_content_ctime(firstTime)`
|
||||
| `security_content_ctime(lastTime)`
|
||||
| `windows_process_injection_with_public_source_path_filter`'
|
||||
how_to_implement: To successfully implement this search you need to be ingesting information
|
||||
on process that include the name of the process responsible for the changes from
|
||||
your endpoints into the `Endpoint` datamodel in the `Processes` node. In addition,
|
||||
confirm the latest CIM App 4.20 or higher is installed and the latest TA for the
|
||||
endpoint product.
|
||||
known_false_positives: some security tool or 3rd party application may do this technique. Filter is needed.
|
||||
how_to_implement: To successfully implement this search, you must be ingesting data
|
||||
that records process activity from your hosts to populate the endpoint data model
|
||||
in the processes node. If you are using Sysmon, you must have at least version 6.0.4
|
||||
of the Sysmon TA.
|
||||
known_false_positives: Some security products or third party applications may utilize CreateRemoteThread, filter as needed before enabling as a notable.
|
||||
references:
|
||||
- https://unit42.paloaltonetworks.com/brute-ratel-c4-tool/
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
@@ -39,7 +36,7 @@ tags:
|
||||
impact: 80
|
||||
kill_chain_phases:
|
||||
- Exploitation
|
||||
message: process $SourceImage$ create a remote thread to process $TargetImage$ in host $Computer$
|
||||
message: process $SourceImage$ create a remote thread to process $TargetImage$ on host $Computer$
|
||||
mitre_attack_id:
|
||||
- T1055
|
||||
- T1055.002
|
||||
@@ -54,6 +51,10 @@ tags:
|
||||
type: Process
|
||||
role:
|
||||
- Attacker
|
||||
- name: TargetImage
|
||||
type: Process
|
||||
role:
|
||||
- Process Name
|
||||
product:
|
||||
- Splunk Enterprise
|
||||
- Splunk Enterprise Security
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -3,13 +3,11 @@ id: daed6823-b51c-4843-a6ad-169708f1323e
|
||||
version: 1
|
||||
date: '2022-08-24'
|
||||
author: Teoderick Contreras, Splunk
|
||||
type: TTP
|
||||
type: Anomaly
|
||||
datamodel:
|
||||
- Endpoint
|
||||
description: The following analytic identifies a registry modification due to deleted services.
|
||||
Red Teams, malicious actors and adversaries may delete a security service as part of its defense evasion.
|
||||
The BRC4 red teaming tool is capable of deleting a services using native windows API that leave lesser noise
|
||||
and footprint in terms of process command-line detections.
|
||||
description: The following analytic identifies a service being deleted from the Windows Registry under CurrentControlSet\Services.
|
||||
Adversaries may delete a service as part of defense evasion.
|
||||
search: '| tstats `security_content_summariesonly` count min(_time) as firstTime max(_time) as lastTime FROM datamodel=Endpoint.Registry
|
||||
where Registry.registry_path= "*\\SYSTEM\\CurrentControlSet\\Services*" AND (Registry.action = deleted OR (Registry.registry_value_name = DeleteFlag AND Registry.registry_value_data = 0x00000001 AND Registry.action=modified))
|
||||
by Registry.registry_key_name Registry.user Registry.registry_path Registry.registry_value_data Registry.registry_value_name Registry.action Registry.dest
|
||||
@@ -21,8 +19,8 @@ how_to_implement: To successfully implement this search you need to be ingesting
|
||||
on process that include the name of the process responsible for the changes from
|
||||
your endpoints into the `Endpoint` datamodel in the `Registry` node. Also make sure
|
||||
that this registry was included in your config files ex. sysmon config to be monitored.
|
||||
known_false_positives: this event can be seen when administrator delete a service or uninstall/reinstall a software that create service entry,
|
||||
But it is still recommended to check this alert with high priority.
|
||||
known_false_positives: This event can be seen when administrator delete a service or uninstall/reinstall a software that creates service entry,
|
||||
but it is still recommended to check this alert with high priority.
|
||||
references:
|
||||
- https://unit42.paloaltonetworks.com/brute-ratel-c4-tool/
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
@@ -33,16 +31,16 @@ tags:
|
||||
- CIS 3
|
||||
- CIS 5
|
||||
- CIS 16
|
||||
confidence: 80
|
||||
confidence: 30
|
||||
context:
|
||||
- Source:Endpoint
|
||||
- Stage:Defense Evasion
|
||||
dataset:
|
||||
- https://media.githubusercontent.com/media/splunk/attack_data/master/datasets/malware/brute_ratel/service_deletion/sysmon.log
|
||||
impact: 80
|
||||
impact: 60
|
||||
kill_chain_phases:
|
||||
- Exploitation
|
||||
message: a service registry $Registry.registry_path$ was deleted in $Registry.dest$
|
||||
message: A service was deleted on $dest$ within the Windows registry.
|
||||
mitre_attack_id:
|
||||
- T1489
|
||||
nist:
|
||||
@@ -70,5 +68,5 @@ tags:
|
||||
- Processes.parent_process_name
|
||||
- Processes.parent_process
|
||||
- Processes.process_guid
|
||||
risk_score: 64
|
||||
risk_score: 18
|
||||
security_domain: endpoint
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user