mirror of
https://github.com/splunk/security_content
synced 2026-06-08 17:32:49 +00:00
Branch was auto-updated.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
|
||||
name: CSC Net On The Fly Compilation
|
||||
id: ea73128a-43ab-11ec-9753-acde48001122
|
||||
version: 1
|
||||
date: '2021-11-12'
|
||||
author: Teoderick Contreras, Splunk
|
||||
type: Hunting
|
||||
datamodel:
|
||||
- Endpoint
|
||||
description: this analytic is to detect a suspicious compile before delivery approach
|
||||
of .net compiler csc.exe. This technique was seen in several adversaries, malware
|
||||
and even in red teams to take advantage the csc.exe .net compiler tool to compile
|
||||
on the fly a malicious .net code to evade detection from security product. This
|
||||
is a good hunting query to check further the file or process created after this
|
||||
event and check the file path that passed to csc.exe which is the .net code. Aside
|
||||
from that, powershell is capable of using this compiler in executing .net code in
|
||||
a powershell script so filter on that case is needed.
|
||||
search: '| tstats `security_content_summariesonly` count min(_time) as firstTime max(_time)
|
||||
as lastTime from datamodel=Endpoint.Processes where `process_csc` Processes.process
|
||||
= "*/noconfig*" Processes.process = "*/fullpaths*" Processes.process = "*@*" by
|
||||
Processes.dest Processes.user Processes.parent_process_name Processes.parent_process
|
||||
Processes.process_name Processes.process Processes.process_id Processes.parent_process_id
|
||||
| `drop_dm_object_name(Processes)` | `security_content_ctime(firstTime)` | `security_content_ctime(lastTime)`
|
||||
| `csc_net_on_the_fly_compilation_filter`'
|
||||
how_to_implement: To successfully implement this search you need to be ingesting information
|
||||
on process that include the name of the process responsible for the changes from
|
||||
your endpoints into the `Endpoint` datamodel in the `Processes` node. In addition,
|
||||
confirm the latest CIM App 4.20 or higher is installed and the latest TA for the
|
||||
endpoint product.
|
||||
known_false_positives: A network operator or systems administrator may utilize an
|
||||
automated powershell script taht execute .net code that may generate false positive.
|
||||
filter is needed.
|
||||
references:
|
||||
- https://app.any.run/tasks/ad4c3cda-41f2-4401-8dba-56cc2d245488/
|
||||
- https://tccontre.blogspot.com/2019/06/maicious-macro-that-compile-c-code-as.html
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
analytic_story:
|
||||
- Windows Defense Evasion Tactics
|
||||
dataset:
|
||||
- https://media.githubusercontent.com/media/splunk/attack_data/master/datasets/malware/vilsel/sysmon.log
|
||||
kill_chain_phases:
|
||||
- Exploitation
|
||||
mitre_attack_id:
|
||||
- T1027.004
|
||||
- T1027
|
||||
product:
|
||||
- Splunk Enterprise
|
||||
- Splunk Enterprise Security
|
||||
- Splunk Cloud
|
||||
required_fields:
|
||||
- _time
|
||||
- Processes.dest
|
||||
- Processes.user
|
||||
- Processes.parent_process_name
|
||||
- Processes.parent_process
|
||||
- Processes.process_name
|
||||
- Processes.process
|
||||
- Processes.process_id
|
||||
- Processes.parent_process_id
|
||||
security_domain: endpoint
|
||||
impact: 50
|
||||
confidence: 50
|
||||
risk_score: 25
|
||||
context:
|
||||
- Source:Endpoint
|
||||
- Stage:Defense Evasion
|
||||
message: csc.exe with commandline $process$ to compile .net code on $dest$ by $user$
|
||||
observable:
|
||||
- name: dest
|
||||
type: Endpoint
|
||||
role:
|
||||
- Victim
|
||||
automated_detection_testing: passed
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
|
||||
name: Firewall Allowed Program Enable
|
||||
id: 9a8f63a8-43ac-11ec-904c-acde48001122
|
||||
version: 1
|
||||
date: '2021-11-12'
|
||||
author: Teoderick Contreras, Splunk
|
||||
type: Anomaly
|
||||
datamodel:
|
||||
- Endpoint
|
||||
description: This analytic detects a potential suspicious modification of firewall
|
||||
rule allowing to execute specific application. This technique was identified when
|
||||
an adversary and red teams to bypassed firewall file execution restriction in a
|
||||
targetted host. Take note that this event or command can run by administrator during
|
||||
testing or allowing legitimate tool or application.
|
||||
search: '| tstats `security_content_summariesonly` count min(_time) as firstTime max(_time)
|
||||
as lastTime from datamodel=Endpoint.Processes where Processes.process = "*firewall*"
|
||||
Processes.process = "*allowedprogram*" Processes.process = "*add*" Processes.process
|
||||
= "*ENABLE*" by Processes.dest Processes.user Processes.parent_process_name Processes.parent_process
|
||||
Processes.process_name Processes.process Processes.process_id Processes.parent_process_id
|
||||
| `drop_dm_object_name(Processes)` | `security_content_ctime(firstTime)` | `security_content_ctime(lastTime)`
|
||||
| `firewall_allowed_program_enable_filter`'
|
||||
how_to_implement: To successfully implement this search you need to be ingesting information
|
||||
on process that include the name of the process responsible for the changes from
|
||||
your endpoints into the `Endpoint` datamodel in the `Processes` node. In addition,
|
||||
confirm the latest CIM App 4.20 or higher is installed and the latest TA for the
|
||||
endpoint product.
|
||||
known_false_positives: A network operator or systems administrator may utilize an
|
||||
automated or manual execution of this firewall rule that may generate false positives.
|
||||
Filter as needed.
|
||||
references:
|
||||
- https://app.any.run/tasks/ad4c3cda-41f2-4401-8dba-56cc2d245488/#
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
analytic_story:
|
||||
- Windows Defense Evasion Tactics
|
||||
dataset:
|
||||
- https://media.githubusercontent.com/media/splunk/attack_data/master/datasets/malware/vilsel/sysmon.log
|
||||
kill_chain_phases:
|
||||
- Reconnaissance
|
||||
mitre_attack_id:
|
||||
- T1562.004
|
||||
- T1562
|
||||
product:
|
||||
- Splunk Enterprise
|
||||
- Splunk Enterprise Security
|
||||
- Splunk Cloud
|
||||
required_fields:
|
||||
- _time
|
||||
- Processes.dest
|
||||
- Processes.user
|
||||
- Processes.parent_process_name
|
||||
- Processes.parent_process
|
||||
- Processes.process_name
|
||||
- Processes.process
|
||||
- Processes.process_id
|
||||
- Processes.parent_process_id
|
||||
security_domain: endpoint
|
||||
impact: 50
|
||||
confidence: 50
|
||||
risk_score: 25
|
||||
context:
|
||||
- Source:Endpoint
|
||||
- Stage:Defense Evasion
|
||||
message: firewall allowed program commandline $process$ of $process_name$ on $dest$
|
||||
by $user$
|
||||
observable:
|
||||
- name: dest
|
||||
type: Endpoint
|
||||
role:
|
||||
- Victim
|
||||
automated_detection_testing: passed
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
|
||||
name: High Frequency Copy Of Files In Network Share
|
||||
id: 40925f12-4709-11ec-bb43-acde48001122
|
||||
version: 1
|
||||
date: '2021-11-16'
|
||||
author: Teoderick Contreras, Splunk
|
||||
type: Anomaly
|
||||
datamodel:
|
||||
- Endpoint
|
||||
description: This analytic is to detect a suspicious high frequency copying/moving
|
||||
of files in network share as part of information sabotage. This anomaly event can
|
||||
be a good indicator of insider trying to sabotage data by transfering classified
|
||||
or internal files within network share to exfitrate it after or to lure evidence
|
||||
of insider attack to other user. This behavior may catch several noise if network
|
||||
share is a common place for classified or internal document processing.
|
||||
search: '`wineventlog_security` EventCode=5145 Relative_Target_Name IN ("*.doc","*.docx","*.xls","*.xlsx","*.ppt","*.pptx","*.log","*.txt","*.db","*.7z","*.zip","*.rar","*.tar","*.gz","*.jpg","*.gif","*.png","*.bmp","*.pdf","*.rtf","*.key")
|
||||
Object_Type=File Share_Name IN ("\\\\*\\C$","\\\\*\\IPC$","\\\\*\\admin$") Access_Mask=
|
||||
"0x2" | bucket _time span=5m | stats values(Relative_Target_Name) as valRelativeTargetName,
|
||||
values(Share_Name) as valShareName, values(Object_Type) as valObjectType, values(Access_Mask)
|
||||
as valAccessmask, values(src_port) as valSrcPort, values(Source_Address) as valSrcAddress
|
||||
count as numShareName by dest, _time, EventCode, user | eventstats avg(numShareName)
|
||||
as avgShareName, stdev(numShareName) as stdShareName, count as numSlots by dest,
|
||||
_time, EventCode, user | eval upperThreshold=(avgShareName + stdShareName *3) | eval
|
||||
isOutlier=if(avgShareName > 20 and avgShareName >= upperThreshold, 1, 0) | search
|
||||
isOutlier=1 | `high_frequency_copy_of_files_in_network_share_filter`'
|
||||
how_to_implement: o successfully implement this search, you need to be ingesting Windows
|
||||
Security Event Logs with 5145 EventCode enabled. The Windows TA is also required.
|
||||
Also enable the object Audit access success/failure in your group policy.
|
||||
known_false_positives: this behavior may seen in normal transfer of file within network
|
||||
if network share is common place for sharing documents.
|
||||
references:
|
||||
- https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1537/
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
analytic_story:
|
||||
- Information Sabotage
|
||||
dataset:
|
||||
- https://media.githubusercontent.com/media/splunk/attack_data/master/datasets/attack_techniques/T1537/high_copy_files_in_net_share/security.log
|
||||
kill_chain_phases:
|
||||
- Exfiltration
|
||||
mitre_attack_id:
|
||||
- T1537
|
||||
product:
|
||||
- Splunk Enterprise
|
||||
- Splunk Enterprise Security
|
||||
- Splunk Cloud
|
||||
required_fields:
|
||||
- _time
|
||||
- EventCode
|
||||
- Share_Name
|
||||
- Relative_Target_Name
|
||||
- Object_Type
|
||||
- Access_Mask
|
||||
- user
|
||||
- src_port
|
||||
- Source_Address
|
||||
security_domain: endpoint
|
||||
impact: 30
|
||||
confidence: 30
|
||||
risk_score: 9
|
||||
context:
|
||||
- Source:Endpoint
|
||||
- Stage:Exfiltration
|
||||
message: high frequency copy of document in network share $Share_Name$ from $Source_Address$
|
||||
by $user$
|
||||
observable:
|
||||
- name: user
|
||||
type: User
|
||||
role:
|
||||
- Victim
|
||||
automated_detection_testing: passed
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
|
||||
name: Loading Of Dynwrapx Module
|
||||
id: eac5e8ba-4857-11ec-9371-acde48001122
|
||||
version: 1
|
||||
date: '2021-11-18'
|
||||
author: Teoderick Contreras, Splunk
|
||||
type: TTP
|
||||
datamodel:
|
||||
- Endpoint
|
||||
description: DynamicWrapperX is an ActiveX component that can be used in a script
|
||||
to call Windows API functions, but it requires the dynwrapx.dll to be installed
|
||||
and registered. With that, registering or loading dynwrapx.dll to a host highly
|
||||
suspect. Why is it needed? In most malicious instances, During triage, review parallel
|
||||
processes and pivot on the process_guid. Review the registry for any suspicious
|
||||
modifications meant to load dynwrapx.dll. Identify any suspicious module loads of
|
||||
dynwrapx.dll. This will identify the process that will invoke vbs/wscript/cscript.
|
||||
search: '`sysmon` EventCode=7 (ImageLoaded = "*\\dynwrapx.dll" OR OriginalFileName
|
||||
= "dynwrapx.dll" OR Product = "DynamicWrapperX") | stats count min(_time) as firstTime
|
||||
max(_time) as lastTime by Image ImageLoaded OriginalFileName Product process_name
|
||||
Computer EventCode Signed ProcessId | `security_content_ctime(firstTime)` | `security_content_ctime(lastTime)`
|
||||
| `loading_of_dynwrapx_module_filter`'
|
||||
how_to_implement: To successfully implement this search you need to be ingesting information
|
||||
on process that include the name of the process responsible for the changes from
|
||||
your endpoints into the `Endpoint` datamodel in the `Processes` and `Filesystem`
|
||||
node. In addition, confirm the latest CIM App 4.20 or higher is installed and the
|
||||
latest TA for the endpoint product.
|
||||
known_false_positives: False positives should be limited, however it is possible to
|
||||
filter by Processes.process_name and specific processes (ex. wscript.exe). Filter
|
||||
as needed. This may need modification based on EDR telemetry and how it brings in
|
||||
registry data. For example, removal of (Default).
|
||||
references:
|
||||
- https://blog.f-secure.com/hunting-for-koadic-a-com-based-rootkit/
|
||||
- https://www.script-coding.com/dynwrapx_eng.html
|
||||
- https://bohops.com/2018/06/28/abusing-com-registry-structure-clsid-localserver32-inprocserver32/
|
||||
- https://tria.ge/210929-ap75vsddan
|
||||
- https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/cb77b93150cb0f7fe65ce8a7e2a5781e727419451355a7736db84109fa215a89
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
analytic_story:
|
||||
- Remcos
|
||||
dataset:
|
||||
- https://media.githubusercontent.com/media/splunk/attack_data/master/datasets/malware/remcos/remcos_dynwrapx/sysmon_dynwraper.log
|
||||
kill_chain_phases:
|
||||
- Exploitation
|
||||
mitre_attack_id:
|
||||
- T1055
|
||||
- T1055.001
|
||||
product:
|
||||
- Splunk Enterprise
|
||||
- Splunk Enterprise Security
|
||||
- Splunk Cloud
|
||||
required_fields:
|
||||
- _time
|
||||
- Image
|
||||
- ImageLoaded
|
||||
- OriginalFileName
|
||||
- Product
|
||||
- process_name
|
||||
- Computer
|
||||
- EventCode
|
||||
- Signed
|
||||
- ProcessId
|
||||
security_domain: endpoint
|
||||
impact: 80
|
||||
confidence: 100
|
||||
risk_score: 80
|
||||
context:
|
||||
- Source:Endpoint
|
||||
- Stage:Defense Evasion
|
||||
message: dynwrapx.dll loaded by process $process_name$ on $Computer$
|
||||
observable:
|
||||
- name: Computer
|
||||
type: Endpoint
|
||||
role:
|
||||
- Victim
|
||||
automated_detection_testing: passed
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
|
||||
name: Network Discovery Using Route Windows App
|
||||
id: dd83407e-439f-11ec-ab8e-acde48001122
|
||||
version: 1
|
||||
date: '2021-11-12'
|
||||
author: Teoderick Contreras, Splunk
|
||||
type: Hunting
|
||||
datamodel:
|
||||
- Endpoint
|
||||
description: This analytic look for a spawned process of route.exe windows application.
|
||||
Adversaries and red teams alike abuse this application the recon or do a network
|
||||
discovery on a target host. but one possible false positive might be an automated
|
||||
tool used by a system administator or a powershell script in amazon ec2 config services.
|
||||
search: '| tstats `security_content_summariesonly` count min(_time) as firstTime max(_time)
|
||||
as lastTime from datamodel=Endpoint.Processes where `process_route` by Processes.dest
|
||||
Processes.user Processes.parent_process_name Processes.parent_process Processes.process_name
|
||||
Processes.process Processes.process_id Processes.parent_process_id | `drop_dm_object_name(Processes)`
|
||||
| `security_content_ctime(firstTime)` | `security_content_ctime(lastTime)` | `network_discovery_using_route_windows_app_filter`'
|
||||
how_to_implement: To successfully implement this search you need to be ingesting information
|
||||
on process that include the name of the process responsible for the changes from
|
||||
your endpoints into the `Endpoint` datamodel in the `Processes` node. In addition,
|
||||
confirm the latest CIM App 4.20 or higher is installed and the latest TA for the
|
||||
endpoint product.
|
||||
known_false_positives: A network operator or systems administrator may utilize an
|
||||
automated host discovery application that may generate false positives or an amazon
|
||||
ec2 script that uses this application. Filter as needed.
|
||||
references:
|
||||
- https://app.any.run/tasks/ad4c3cda-41f2-4401-8dba-56cc2d245488/#
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
analytic_story:
|
||||
- Active Directory Discovery
|
||||
dataset:
|
||||
- https://media.githubusercontent.com/media/splunk/attack_data/master/datasets/malware/vilsel/sysmon.log
|
||||
kill_chain_phases:
|
||||
- Reconnaissance
|
||||
mitre_attack_id:
|
||||
- T1016
|
||||
- T1016.001
|
||||
product:
|
||||
- Splunk Enterprise
|
||||
- Splunk Enterprise Security
|
||||
- Splunk Cloud
|
||||
required_fields:
|
||||
- _time
|
||||
- Processes.dest
|
||||
- Processes.user
|
||||
- Processes.parent_process_name
|
||||
- Processes.parent_process
|
||||
- Processes.process_name
|
||||
- Processes.process
|
||||
- Processes.process_id
|
||||
- Processes.parent_process_id
|
||||
security_domain: endpoint
|
||||
impact: 30
|
||||
confidence: 30
|
||||
risk_score: 9
|
||||
context:
|
||||
- Source:Endpoint
|
||||
- Stage:Discovery
|
||||
- Stage:Recon
|
||||
message: Network Connection discovery on $dest$ by $user$
|
||||
observable:
|
||||
- name: dest
|
||||
type: Endpoint
|
||||
role:
|
||||
- Victim
|
||||
automated_detection_testing: passed
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
|
||||
name: Runas Execution in CommandLine
|
||||
id: 4807e716-43a4-11ec-a0e7-acde48001122
|
||||
version: 1
|
||||
date: '2021-11-12'
|
||||
author: Teoderick Contreras, Splunk
|
||||
type: Hunting
|
||||
datamodel:
|
||||
- Endpoint
|
||||
description: This analytic look for a spawned runas.exe process with a administrator
|
||||
user option parameter. This parameter was abused by adversaries, malware author
|
||||
or even red teams to gain elevated privileges in target host. This is a good hunting
|
||||
query to figure out privilege escalation tactics that may used for different stages
|
||||
like lateral movement but take note that administrator may use this command in purpose
|
||||
so its better to see other event context before and after this analytic.
|
||||
search: '| tstats `security_content_summariesonly` count min(_time) as firstTime max(_time)
|
||||
as lastTime from datamodel=Endpoint.Processes where `process_runas` AND Processes.process
|
||||
= "*/user:*" AND Processes.process = "*admin*" by Processes.dest Processes.user
|
||||
Processes.parent_process_name Processes.parent_process Processes.process_name Processes.process
|
||||
Processes.process_id Processes.parent_process_id | `drop_dm_object_name(Processes)`
|
||||
| `security_content_ctime(firstTime)` | `security_content_ctime(lastTime)` | `runas_execution_in_commandline_filter`'
|
||||
how_to_implement: To successfully implement this search you need to be ingesting information
|
||||
on process that include the name of the process responsible for the changes from
|
||||
your endpoints into the `Endpoint` datamodel in the `Processes` node. In addition,
|
||||
confirm the latest CIM App 4.20 or higher is installed and the latest TA for the
|
||||
endpoint product.
|
||||
known_false_positives: A network operator or systems administrator may utilize an
|
||||
automated or manual execute this command that may generate false positives. filter
|
||||
is needed.
|
||||
references:
|
||||
- https://app.any.run/tasks/ad4c3cda-41f2-4401-8dba-56cc2d245488/#
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
analytic_story:
|
||||
- Windows Privilege Escalation
|
||||
dataset:
|
||||
- https://media.githubusercontent.com/media/splunk/attack_data/master/datasets/malware/vilsel/sysmon.log
|
||||
kill_chain_phases:
|
||||
- Privilege Escalation
|
||||
mitre_attack_id:
|
||||
- T1134
|
||||
- T1134.001
|
||||
product:
|
||||
- Splunk Enterprise
|
||||
- Splunk Enterprise Security
|
||||
- Splunk Cloud
|
||||
required_fields:
|
||||
- _time
|
||||
- Processes.dest
|
||||
- Processes.user
|
||||
- Processes.parent_process_name
|
||||
- Processes.parent_process
|
||||
- Processes.process_name
|
||||
- Processes.process
|
||||
- Processes.process_id
|
||||
- Processes.parent_process_id
|
||||
security_domain: endpoint
|
||||
impact: 50
|
||||
confidence: 50
|
||||
risk_score: 25
|
||||
context:
|
||||
- Source:Endpoint
|
||||
- stage:Privilege Escalation
|
||||
message: elevated process using runas on $dest$ by $user$
|
||||
observable:
|
||||
- name: dest
|
||||
type: Endpoint
|
||||
role:
|
||||
- Victim
|
||||
automated_detection_testing: passed
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
|
||||
name: Suspicious Process DNS Query Known Abuse Web Services
|
||||
id: 3cf0dc36-484d-11ec-a6bc-acde48001122
|
||||
version: 1
|
||||
date: '2021-11-18'
|
||||
author: Teoderick Contreras, Splunk
|
||||
type: TTP
|
||||
datamodel:
|
||||
- Endpoint
|
||||
description: This analytic is to detect a suspicious process having a dns query on
|
||||
known abuse text paste web services, or VoIP, instant messaging and digital distribution
|
||||
platform to download some files. This technique is abused by adversaries, malware
|
||||
attacker and red team to download a malicious file on the target host. This is a
|
||||
good TTP indicator for possible initial access technique. Noise and false positive
|
||||
can be seen if the following instant messaging is allowed or common application
|
||||
in corporate network.
|
||||
search: '`sysmon` EventCode=22 QueryName IN ("*pastebin*", "*discord*", "*telegram*",
|
||||
"*t.me*") process_name IN ("cmd.exe", "*powershell*", "pwsh.exe", "wscript.exe",
|
||||
"cscript.exe") | stats count min(_time) as firstTime max(_time) as lastTime by Image
|
||||
QueryName QueryStatus process_name QueryResults Computer | `security_content_ctime(firstTime)`
|
||||
| `security_content_ctime(lastTime)` | `suspicious_process_dns_query_known_abuse_web_services_filter`'
|
||||
how_to_implement: his detection relies on sysmon logs with the Event ID 7, Driver
|
||||
loaded. Please tune your sysmon config that you DriverLoad event for SolarWinds.Orion.Core.BusinessLayer.dll
|
||||
is captured by Sysmon. Additionally, you need sysmon logs for Event ID 22, DNS Query.
|
||||
We suggest to run this detection at least once a day over the last 14 days.
|
||||
known_false_positives: Noise and false positive can be seen if the following instant
|
||||
messaging is allowed to use within corporate network. filter is needed.
|
||||
references:
|
||||
- https://urlhaus.abuse.ch/url/1798923/
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
analytic_story:
|
||||
- Remcos
|
||||
dataset:
|
||||
- https://media.githubusercontent.com/media/splunk/attack_data/master/datasets/malware/remcos/remcos_pastebin_download/sysmon.log
|
||||
kill_chain_phases:
|
||||
- Exploitation
|
||||
mitre_attack_id:
|
||||
- T1059.005
|
||||
- T1059
|
||||
product:
|
||||
- Splunk Enterprise
|
||||
- Splunk Enterprise Security
|
||||
- Splunk Cloud
|
||||
required_fields:
|
||||
- _time
|
||||
- Image
|
||||
- QueryName
|
||||
- QueryStatus
|
||||
- process_name
|
||||
- QueryResults
|
||||
- Computer
|
||||
security_domain: endpoint
|
||||
impact: 80
|
||||
confidence: 80
|
||||
risk_score: 64
|
||||
context:
|
||||
- Source:Endpoint
|
||||
- Stage:Execution
|
||||
message: suspicious process $process_name$ has a dns query in $QueryName$ on $Computer$
|
||||
observable:
|
||||
- name: Computer
|
||||
type: Hostname
|
||||
role:
|
||||
- Victim
|
||||
- name: process_name
|
||||
type: process name
|
||||
role:
|
||||
- Attacker
|
||||
automated_detection_testing: passed
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
|
||||
definition: (Processes.process_name=csc.exe OR Processes.original_file_name=csc.exe)
|
||||
description: Matches the process with its original file name, data for this macro came from https://strontic.github.io/
|
||||
name: process_csc
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
|
||||
definition: (Processes.process_name=route.exe OR Processes.original_file_name=route.exe)
|
||||
description: Matches the process with its original file name, data for this macro came from https://strontic.github.io/
|
||||
name: process_route
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
|
||||
definition: (Processes.process_name=runas.exe OR Processes.original_file_name=runas.exe)
|
||||
description: Matches the process with its original file name, data for this macro came from https://strontic.github.io/
|
||||
name: process_runas
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
|
||||
name: CSC Net On The Fly Compilation Unit Test
|
||||
tests:
|
||||
- name: CSC Net On The Fly Compilation
|
||||
file: endpoint/csc_net_on_the_fly_compilation.yml
|
||||
pass_condition: '| stats count | where count > 0'
|
||||
earliest_time: '-30d'
|
||||
latest_time: 'now'
|
||||
attack_data:
|
||||
- file_name: sysmon.log
|
||||
data: https://media.githubusercontent.com/media/splunk/attack_data/master/datasets/malware/vilsel/sysmon.log
|
||||
source: XmlWinEventLog:Microsoft-Windows-Sysmon/Operational
|
||||
sourcetype: xmlwineventlog
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
|
||||
name: Firewall Allowed Program Enable Unit Test
|
||||
tests:
|
||||
- name: Firewall Allowed Program Enable
|
||||
file: endpoint/firewall_allowed_program_enable.yml
|
||||
pass_condition: '| stats count | where count > 0'
|
||||
earliest_time: '-30d'
|
||||
latest_time: 'now'
|
||||
attack_data:
|
||||
- file_name: sysmon.log
|
||||
data: https://media.githubusercontent.com/media/splunk/attack_data/master/datasets/malware/vilsel/sysmon.log
|
||||
source: XmlWinEventLog:Microsoft-Windows-Sysmon/Operational
|
||||
sourcetype: xmlwineventlog
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
|
||||
name: High Frequency Copy Of Files In Network Share Unit Test
|
||||
tests:
|
||||
- name: High Frequency Copy Of Files In Network Share
|
||||
file: endpoint/high_frequency_copy_of_files_in_network_share.yml
|
||||
pass_condition: '| stats count | where count > 0'
|
||||
earliest_time: '-30d'
|
||||
latest_time: 'now'
|
||||
attack_data:
|
||||
- file_name: security.log
|
||||
data: https://media.githubusercontent.com/media/splunk/attack_data/master/datasets/attack_techniques/T1537/high_copy_files_in_net_share/security.log
|
||||
source: WinEventLog:Security
|
||||
sourcetype: WinEventLog
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
|
||||
name: Loading Of Dynwrapx Module Unit Test
|
||||
tests:
|
||||
- name: Loading Of Dynwrapx Module
|
||||
file: endpoint/loading_of_dynwrapx_module.yml
|
||||
pass_condition: '| stats count | where count > 0'
|
||||
earliest_time: '-24h'
|
||||
latest_time: 'now'
|
||||
attack_data:
|
||||
- file_name: sysmon_dynwraper.log
|
||||
data: https://media.githubusercontent.com/media/splunk/attack_data/master/datasets/malware/remcos/remcos_dynwrapx/sysmon_dynwraper.log
|
||||
source: XmlWinEventLog:Microsoft-Windows-Sysmon/Operational
|
||||
sourcetype: xmlwineventlog
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
|
||||
name: Network Discovery Using Route Windows App Unit Test
|
||||
tests:
|
||||
- name: Network Discovery Using Route Windows App
|
||||
file: endpoint/network_discovery_using_route_windows_app.yml
|
||||
pass_condition: '| stats count | where count > 0'
|
||||
earliest_time: '-30d'
|
||||
latest_time: 'now'
|
||||
attack_data:
|
||||
- file_name: sysmon.log
|
||||
data: https://media.githubusercontent.com/media/splunk/attack_data/master/datasets/malware/vilsel/sysmon.log
|
||||
source: XmlWinEventLog:Microsoft-Windows-Sysmon/Operational
|
||||
sourcetype: WinEventLog
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
|
||||
name: Runas Execution in CommandLine Unit Test
|
||||
tests:
|
||||
- name: Runas Execution in CommandLine
|
||||
file: endpoint/runas_execution_in_commandline.yml
|
||||
pass_condition: '| stats count | where count > 0'
|
||||
earliest_time: '-30d'
|
||||
latest_time: 'now'
|
||||
attack_data:
|
||||
- file_name: sysmon.log
|
||||
data: https://media.githubusercontent.com/media/splunk/attack_data/master/datasets/malware/vilsel/sysmon.log
|
||||
source: XmlWinEventLog:Microsoft-Windows-Sysmon/Operational
|
||||
sourcetype: xmlwineventlog
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
|
||||
name: Suspicious Process DNS Query Known Abuse Web Services Unit Test
|
||||
tests:
|
||||
- name: Suspicious Process DNS Query Known Abuse Web Services
|
||||
file: endpoint/suspicious_process_dns_query_known_abuse_web_services.yml
|
||||
pass_condition: '| stats count | where count > 0'
|
||||
earliest_time: '-24h'
|
||||
latest_time: 'now'
|
||||
attack_data:
|
||||
- file_name: sysmon.log
|
||||
data: https://media.githubusercontent.com/media/splunk/attack_data/master/datasets/malware/remcos/remcos_pastebin_download/sysmon.log
|
||||
source: XmlWinEventLog:Microsoft-Windows-Sysmon/Operational
|
||||
sourcetype: xmlwineventlog
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user