mirror of
https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework
synced 2026-06-08 17:33:33 +00:00
Further emphasize @Configuration classes over XML and Groovy in testing chapter
See gh-36393
(cherry picked from commit 9eea227ab9)
This commit is contained in:
@@ -94,11 +94,11 @@ Dependency injection by using `@Autowired` is provided by the
|
||||
Test classes that use the TestContext framework do not need to extend any particular
|
||||
class or implement a specific interface to configure their application context. Instead,
|
||||
configuration is achieved by declaring the `@ContextConfiguration` annotation at the
|
||||
class level. If your test class does not explicitly declare application context resource
|
||||
locations or component classes, the configured `ContextLoader` determines how to load a
|
||||
context from a default location or default configuration classes. In addition to context
|
||||
resource locations and component classes, an application context can also be configured
|
||||
through xref:testing/testcontext-framework/ctx-management/context-customizers.adoc[context customizers]
|
||||
class level. If your test class does not explicitly declare component classes or resource
|
||||
locations, the configured `ContextLoader` determines how to load a context from _default_
|
||||
configuration classes or a _default_ location. In addition to component classes and
|
||||
context resource locations, an application context can also be configured through
|
||||
xref:testing/testcontext-framework/ctx-management/context-customizers.adoc[context customizers]
|
||||
or xref:testing/testcontext-framework/ctx-management/initializers.adoc[context initializers].
|
||||
|
||||
The following sections explain how to use `@ContextConfiguration` and related annotations
|
||||
@@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ or context initializers. Alternatively, you can implement and configure your own
|
||||
* xref:testing/testcontext-framework/ctx-management/javaconfig.adoc[Context Configuration with Component Classes]
|
||||
* xref:testing/testcontext-framework/ctx-management/xml.adoc[Context Configuration with XML resources]
|
||||
* xref:testing/testcontext-framework/ctx-management/groovy.adoc[Context Configuration with Groovy Scripts]
|
||||
* xref:testing/testcontext-framework/ctx-management/mixed-config.adoc[Mixing XML, Groovy Scripts, and Component Classes]
|
||||
* xref:testing/testcontext-framework/ctx-management/mixed-config.adoc[Mixing Component Classes, XML, and Groovy Scripts]
|
||||
* xref:testing/testcontext-framework/ctx-management/context-customizers.adoc[Context Configuration with Context Customizers]
|
||||
* xref:testing/testcontext-framework/ctx-management/initializers.adoc[Context Configuration with Context Initializers]
|
||||
* xref:testing/testcontext-framework/ctx-management/inheritance.adoc[Context Configuration Inheritance]
|
||||
|
||||
+21
-22
@@ -1,33 +1,32 @@
|
||||
[[testcontext-ctx-management-mixed-config]]
|
||||
= Mixing XML, Groovy Scripts, and Component Classes
|
||||
= Mixing Component Classes, XML, and Groovy Scripts
|
||||
|
||||
It may sometimes be desirable to mix XML configuration files, Groovy scripts, and
|
||||
component classes (typically `@Configuration` classes) to configure an
|
||||
`ApplicationContext` for your tests. For example, if you use XML configuration in
|
||||
production, you may decide that you want to use `@Configuration` classes to configure
|
||||
It may sometimes be desirable to mix component classes (typically `@Configuration`
|
||||
classes), XML configuration files, or Groovy scripts to configure an `ApplicationContext`
|
||||
for your tests. For example, if you use XML configuration in production for legacy
|
||||
reasons, you may decide that you want to use `@Configuration` classes to configure
|
||||
specific Spring-managed components for your tests, or vice versa.
|
||||
|
||||
Furthermore, some third-party frameworks (such as Spring Boot) provide first-class
|
||||
support for loading an `ApplicationContext` from different types of resources
|
||||
simultaneously (for example, XML configuration files, Groovy scripts, and
|
||||
`@Configuration` classes). The Spring Framework, historically, has not supported this for
|
||||
standard deployments. Consequently, most of the `SmartContextLoader` implementations that
|
||||
the Spring Framework delivers in the `spring-test` module support only one resource type
|
||||
for each test context. However, this does not mean that you cannot use both. One
|
||||
exception to the general rule is that the `GenericGroovyXmlContextLoader` and
|
||||
simultaneously (for example, `@Configuration` classes, XML configuration files, and
|
||||
Groovy scripts). The Spring Framework, historically, has not supported this for standard
|
||||
deployments. Consequently, most of the `SmartContextLoader` implementations that the
|
||||
Spring Framework delivers in the `spring-test` module support only one resource type for
|
||||
each test context. However, this does not mean that you cannot use a mixture of resource
|
||||
types. One exception to the general rule is that the `GenericGroovyXmlContextLoader` and
|
||||
`GenericGroovyXmlWebContextLoader` support both XML configuration files and Groovy
|
||||
scripts simultaneously. Furthermore, third-party frameworks may choose to support the
|
||||
declaration of both `locations` and `classes` through `@ContextConfiguration`, and, with
|
||||
declaration of both `classes` and `locations` through `@ContextConfiguration`, and, with
|
||||
the standard testing support in the TestContext framework, you have the following options.
|
||||
|
||||
If you want to use resource locations (for example, XML or Groovy) and `@Configuration`
|
||||
classes to configure your tests, you must pick one as the entry point, and that one must
|
||||
include or import the other. For example, in XML or Groovy scripts, you can include
|
||||
`@Configuration` classes by using component scanning or defining them as normal Spring
|
||||
beans, whereas, in a `@Configuration` class, you can use `@ImportResource` to import XML
|
||||
configuration files or Groovy scripts. Note that this behavior is semantically equivalent
|
||||
If you want to use `@Configuration` classes and resource locations (for example, XML or
|
||||
Groovy) to configure your tests, you must pick one as the entry point, and that one must
|
||||
import or include the other. For example, in a `@Configuration` class, you can use
|
||||
`@ImportResource` to import XML configuration files or Groovy scripts; whereas, in XML or
|
||||
Groovy scripts, you can include `@Configuration` classes by using component scanning or
|
||||
defining them as normal Spring beans. Note that this behavior is semantically equivalent
|
||||
to how you configure your application in production: In production configuration, you
|
||||
define either a set of XML or Groovy resource locations or a set of `@Configuration`
|
||||
classes from which your production `ApplicationContext` is loaded, but you still have the
|
||||
freedom to include or import the other type of configuration.
|
||||
|
||||
define either a set of `@Configuration` classes or a set of XML or Groovy resource
|
||||
locations from which your production `ApplicationContext` is loaded, but you still have
|
||||
the freedom to import or include the other type of configuration.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user