Compare commits
1 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3a04435cd0 |
@@ -1,33 +0,0 @@
|
||||
name: Send notification
|
||||
description: Sends a Google Chat message as a notification of the job's outcome
|
||||
inputs:
|
||||
webhook-url:
|
||||
description: 'Google Chat Webhook URL'
|
||||
required: true
|
||||
status:
|
||||
description: 'Status of the job'
|
||||
required: true
|
||||
build-scan-url:
|
||||
description: 'URL of the build scan to include in the notification'
|
||||
run-name:
|
||||
description: 'Name of the run to include in the notification'
|
||||
default: ${{ format('{0} {1}', github.ref_name, github.job) }}
|
||||
runs:
|
||||
using: composite
|
||||
steps:
|
||||
- shell: bash
|
||||
run: |
|
||||
echo "BUILD_SCAN=${{ inputs.build-scan-url == '' && ' [build scan unavailable]' || format(' [<{0}|Build Scan>]', inputs.build-scan-url) }}" >> "$GITHUB_ENV"
|
||||
echo "RUN_URL=${{ github.server_url }}/${{ github.repository }}/actions/runs/${{ github.run_id }}" >> "$GITHUB_ENV"
|
||||
- shell: bash
|
||||
if: ${{ inputs.status == 'success' }}
|
||||
run: |
|
||||
curl -X POST '${{ inputs.webhook-url }}' -H 'Content-Type: application/json' -d '{ text: "<${{ env.RUN_URL }}|${{ inputs.run-name }}> was successful ${{ env.BUILD_SCAN }}"}' || true
|
||||
- shell: bash
|
||||
if: ${{ inputs.status == 'failure' }}
|
||||
run: |
|
||||
curl -X POST '${{ inputs.webhook-url }}' -H 'Content-Type: application/json' -d '{ text: "<users/all> *<${{ env.RUN_URL }}|${{ inputs.run-name }}> failed* ${{ env.BUILD_SCAN }}"}' || true
|
||||
- shell: bash
|
||||
if: ${{ inputs.status == 'cancelled' }}
|
||||
run: |
|
||||
curl -X POST '${{ inputs.webhook-url }}' -H 'Content-Type: application/json' -d '{ text: "<${{ env.RUN_URL }}|${{ inputs.run-name }}> was cancelled"}' || true
|
||||
@@ -3,8 +3,6 @@ name: Backport Bot
|
||||
on:
|
||||
issues:
|
||||
types: [labeled]
|
||||
pull_request:
|
||||
types: [labeled]
|
||||
push:
|
||||
branches:
|
||||
- '*.x'
|
||||
@@ -15,16 +13,13 @@ jobs:
|
||||
permissions:
|
||||
contents: read
|
||||
issues: write
|
||||
pull-requests: write
|
||||
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
|
||||
steps:
|
||||
- name: Check out code
|
||||
uses: actions/checkout@v4
|
||||
- name: Set up Java
|
||||
uses: actions/setup-java@v4
|
||||
- uses: actions/checkout@v3
|
||||
- uses: actions/setup-java@v3
|
||||
with:
|
||||
distribution: 'liberica'
|
||||
java-version: 17
|
||||
distribution: 'temurin'
|
||||
java-version: '17'
|
||||
- name: Download BackportBot
|
||||
run: wget https://github.com/spring-io/backport-bot/releases/download/latest/backport-bot-0.0.1-SNAPSHOT.jar
|
||||
- name: Backport
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,63 +0,0 @@
|
||||
name: Build and deploy snapshot
|
||||
on:
|
||||
push:
|
||||
branches:
|
||||
- 6.0.x
|
||||
concurrency:
|
||||
group: ${{ github.workflow }}-${{ github.ref }}
|
||||
jobs:
|
||||
build-and-deploy-snapshot:
|
||||
if: ${{ github.repository == 'spring-projects/spring-framework' }}
|
||||
name: Build and deploy snapshot
|
||||
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
|
||||
steps:
|
||||
- name: Set up Java
|
||||
uses: actions/setup-java@v4
|
||||
with:
|
||||
distribution: 'liberica'
|
||||
java-version: 17
|
||||
- name: Check out code
|
||||
uses: actions/checkout@v4
|
||||
- name: Set up Gradle
|
||||
uses: gradle/actions/setup-gradle@417ae3ccd767c252f5661f1ace9f835f9654f2b5
|
||||
with:
|
||||
cache-read-only: false
|
||||
- name: Configure Gradle properties
|
||||
shell: bash
|
||||
run: |
|
||||
mkdir -p $HOME/.gradle
|
||||
echo 'systemProp.user.name=spring-builds+github' >> $HOME/.gradle/gradle.properties
|
||||
echo 'systemProp.org.gradle.internal.launcher.welcomeMessageEnabled=false' >> $HOME/.gradle/gradle.properties
|
||||
echo 'org.gradle.daemon=false' >> $HOME/.gradle/gradle.properties
|
||||
echo 'org.gradle.daemon=4' >> $HOME/.gradle/gradle.properties
|
||||
- name: Build and publish
|
||||
id: build
|
||||
env:
|
||||
CI: 'true'
|
||||
GRADLE_ENTERPRISE_URL: 'https://ge.spring.io'
|
||||
DEVELOCITY_ACCESS_KEY: ${{ secrets.GRADLE_ENTERPRISE_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY }}
|
||||
run: ./gradlew -PdeploymentRepository=$(pwd)/deployment-repository build publishAllPublicationsToDeploymentRepository
|
||||
- name: Deploy
|
||||
uses: spring-io/artifactory-deploy-action@v0.0.1
|
||||
with:
|
||||
uri: 'https://repo.spring.io'
|
||||
username: ${{ secrets.ARTIFACTORY_USERNAME }}
|
||||
password: ${{ secrets.ARTIFACTORY_PASSWORD }}
|
||||
build-name: ${{ format('spring-framework-{0}', github.ref_name)}}
|
||||
repository: 'libs-snapshot-local'
|
||||
folder: 'deployment-repository'
|
||||
signing-key: ${{ secrets.GPG_PRIVATE_KEY }}
|
||||
signing-passphrase: ${{ secrets.GPG_PASSPHRASE }}
|
||||
artifact-properties: |
|
||||
/**/framework-docs-*.zip::zip.name=spring-framework,zip.deployed=false
|
||||
/**/framework-docs-*-docs.zip::zip.type=docs
|
||||
/**/framework-docs-*-dist.zip::zip.type=dist
|
||||
/**/framework-docs-*-schema.zip::zip.type=schema
|
||||
- name: Send notification
|
||||
uses: ./.github/actions/send-notification
|
||||
if: always()
|
||||
with:
|
||||
webhook-url: ${{ secrets.GOOGLE_CHAT_WEBHOOK_URL }}
|
||||
status: ${{ job.status }}
|
||||
build-scan-url: ${{ steps.build.outputs.build-scan-url }}
|
||||
run-name: ${{ format('{0} | Linux | Java 17', github.ref_name) }}
|
||||
@@ -1,78 +0,0 @@
|
||||
name: CI
|
||||
on:
|
||||
push:
|
||||
branches:
|
||||
- 6.0.x
|
||||
concurrency:
|
||||
group: ${{ github.workflow }}-${{ github.ref }}
|
||||
jobs:
|
||||
ci:
|
||||
if: ${{ github.repository == 'spring-projects/spring-framework' }}
|
||||
strategy:
|
||||
matrix:
|
||||
os:
|
||||
- id: ubuntu-latest
|
||||
name: Linux
|
||||
java:
|
||||
- version: 17
|
||||
toolchain: false
|
||||
- version: 21
|
||||
toolchain: true
|
||||
exclude:
|
||||
- os:
|
||||
name: Linux
|
||||
java:
|
||||
version: 17
|
||||
name: '${{ matrix.os.name}} | Java ${{ matrix.java.version}}'
|
||||
runs-on: ${{ matrix.os.id }}
|
||||
steps:
|
||||
- name: Set up Java
|
||||
uses: actions/setup-java@v4
|
||||
with:
|
||||
distribution: 'liberica'
|
||||
java-version: |
|
||||
${{ matrix.java.version }}
|
||||
${{ matrix.java.toolchain && '17' || '' }}
|
||||
- name: Prepare Windows runner
|
||||
if: ${{ runner.os == 'Windows' }}
|
||||
run: |
|
||||
git config --global core.autocrlf true
|
||||
git config --global core.longPaths true
|
||||
Stop-Service -name Docker
|
||||
- name: Check out code
|
||||
uses: actions/checkout@v4
|
||||
- name: Set up Gradle
|
||||
uses: gradle/actions/setup-gradle@417ae3ccd767c252f5661f1ace9f835f9654f2b5
|
||||
with:
|
||||
cache-read-only: false
|
||||
- name: Configure Gradle properties
|
||||
shell: bash
|
||||
run: |
|
||||
mkdir -p $HOME/.gradle
|
||||
echo 'systemProp.user.name=spring-builds+github' >> $HOME/.gradle/gradle.properties
|
||||
echo 'systemProp.org.gradle.internal.launcher.welcomeMessageEnabled=false' >> $HOME/.gradle/gradle.properties
|
||||
echo 'org.gradle.daemon=false' >> $HOME/.gradle/gradle.properties
|
||||
echo 'org.gradle.daemon=4' >> $HOME/.gradle/gradle.properties
|
||||
- name: Configure toolchain properties
|
||||
if: ${{ matrix.java.toolchain }}
|
||||
shell: bash
|
||||
run: |
|
||||
echo toolchainVersion=${{ matrix.java.version }} >> $HOME/.gradle/gradle.properties
|
||||
echo systemProp.org.gradle.java.installations.auto-detect=false >> $HOME/.gradle/gradle.properties
|
||||
echo systemProp.org.gradle.java.installations.auto-download=false >> $HOME/.gradle/gradle.properties
|
||||
echo systemProp.org.gradle.java.installations.paths=${{ format('$JAVA_HOME_{0}_X64', matrix.java.version) }} >> $HOME/.gradle/gradle.properties
|
||||
- name: Build
|
||||
id: build
|
||||
env:
|
||||
CI: 'true'
|
||||
GRADLE_ENTERPRISE_URL: 'https://ge.spring.io'
|
||||
DEVELOCITY_ACCESS_KEY: ${{ secrets.GRADLE_ENTERPRISE_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY }}
|
||||
run: ./gradlew check antora
|
||||
- name: Send notification
|
||||
uses: ./.github/actions/send-notification
|
||||
if: always()
|
||||
with:
|
||||
webhook-url: ${{ secrets.GOOGLE_CHAT_WEBHOOK_URL }}
|
||||
status: ${{ job.status }}
|
||||
build-scan-url: ${{ steps.build.outputs.build-scan-url }}
|
||||
run-name: ${{ format('{0} | {1} | Java {2}', github.ref_name, matrix.os.name, matrix.java.version) }}
|
||||
@@ -1,34 +0,0 @@
|
||||
name: Deploy Docs
|
||||
on:
|
||||
push:
|
||||
branches:
|
||||
- 'main'
|
||||
- '*.x'
|
||||
- '!gh-pages'
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- 'v*'
|
||||
repository_dispatch:
|
||||
types: request-build-reference # legacy
|
||||
workflow_dispatch:
|
||||
permissions:
|
||||
actions: write
|
||||
jobs:
|
||||
build:
|
||||
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
|
||||
if: github.repository_owner == 'spring-projects'
|
||||
steps:
|
||||
- name: Check out code
|
||||
uses: actions/checkout@v4
|
||||
with:
|
||||
ref: docs-build
|
||||
fetch-depth: 1
|
||||
- name: Dispatch (partial build)
|
||||
if: github.ref_type == 'branch'
|
||||
env:
|
||||
GH_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
|
||||
run: gh workflow run deploy-docs.yml -r $(git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD) -f build-refname=${{ github.ref_name }}
|
||||
- name: Dispatch (full build)
|
||||
if: github.ref_type == 'tag'
|
||||
env:
|
||||
GH_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
|
||||
run: gh workflow run deploy-docs.yml -r $(git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD)
|
||||
@@ -9,5 +9,5 @@ jobs:
|
||||
name: "Validation"
|
||||
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
|
||||
steps:
|
||||
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
|
||||
- uses: gradle/wrapper-validation-action@v2
|
||||
- uses: actions/checkout@v3
|
||||
- uses: gradle/wrapper-validation-action@v1
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -21,14 +21,15 @@ derby.log
|
||||
/build
|
||||
buildSrc/build
|
||||
/spring-*/build
|
||||
/framework-*/build
|
||||
/framework-bom/build
|
||||
/framework-docs/build
|
||||
/integration-tests/build
|
||||
/src/asciidoc/build
|
||||
spring-test/test-output/
|
||||
|
||||
# Maven artifacts
|
||||
pom.xml
|
||||
/target/
|
||||
target/
|
||||
|
||||
# Eclipse artifacts, including WTP generated manifests
|
||||
bin
|
||||
@@ -49,7 +50,3 @@ atlassian-ide-plugin.xml
|
||||
|
||||
# VS Code
|
||||
.vscode/
|
||||
|
||||
cached-antora-playbook.yml
|
||||
|
||||
node_modules
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
|
||||
Juergen Hoeller <jhoeller@vmware.com>
|
||||
Juergen Hoeller <jhoeller@vmware.com> <jhoeller@pivotal.io>
|
||||
Juergen Hoeller <jhoeller@vmware.com> <jhoeller@gopivotal.com>
|
||||
Rossen Stoyanchev <rstoyanchev@vmware.com>
|
||||
Rossen Stoyanchev <rstoyanchev@vmware.com> <rstoyanchev@pivotal.io>
|
||||
Rossen Stoyanchev <rstoyanchev@vmware.com> <rstoyanchev@gopivotal.com>
|
||||
Phillip Webb <pwebb@vmware.com>
|
||||
Phillip Webb <pwebb@vmware.com> <pwebb@pivotal.io>
|
||||
Phillip Webb <pwebb@vmware.com> <pwebb@gopivotal.com>
|
||||
Chris Beams <cbeams@vmware.com>
|
||||
Chris Beams <cbeams@vmware.com> <cbeams@pivotal.io>
|
||||
Chris Beams <cbeams@vmware.com> <cbeams@gopivotal.com>
|
||||
Arjen Poutsma <poutsmaa@vmware.com>
|
||||
Arjen Poutsma <poutsmaa@vmware.com> <apoutsma@pivotal.io>
|
||||
Arjen Poutsma <poutsmaa@vmware.com> <apoutsma@gopivotal.com>
|
||||
Arjen Poutsma <poutsmaa@vmware.com> <poutsma@mac.com>
|
||||
Arjen Poutsma <poutsmaa@vmware.com> <apoutsma@vmware.com>
|
||||
Oliver Drotbohm <odrotbohm@vmware.com>
|
||||
Oliver Drotbohm <odrotbohm@vmware.com> <ogierke@vmware.com>
|
||||
Oliver Drotbohm <odrotbohm@vmware.com> <ogierke@pivotal.io>
|
||||
Oliver Drotbohm <odrotbohm@vmware.com> <ogierke@gopivotal.com>
|
||||
Dave Syer <dsyer@vmware.com>
|
||||
Dave Syer <dsyer@vmware.com> <dsyer@pivotal.io>
|
||||
Dave Syer <dsyer@vmware.com> <dsyer@gopivotal.com>
|
||||
Dave Syer <dsyer@vmware.com> <david_syer@hotmail.com>
|
||||
Andy Clement <aclement@vmware.com>
|
||||
Andy Clement <aclement@vmware.com> <aclement@pivotal.io>
|
||||
Andy Clement <aclement@vmware.com> <aclement@gopivotal.com>
|
||||
Andy Clement <aclement@vmware.com> <andrew.clement@gmail.com>
|
||||
Sam Brannen <sbrannen@vmware.com>
|
||||
Sam Brannen <sbrannen@vmware.com> <sbrannen@pivotal.io>
|
||||
Sam Brannen <sbrannen@vmware.com> <sam@sambrannen.com>
|
||||
<dmitry.katsubo@gmail.com> <dmitry.katsubo@gmai.com>
|
||||
Nick Williams <nicholas@nicholaswilliams.net>
|
||||
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
|
||||
# Enable auto-env through the sdkman_auto_env config
|
||||
# Add key=value pairs of SDKs to use below
|
||||
java=17.0.11-librca
|
||||
java=17.0.5-librca
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
|
||||
# <img src="framework-docs/src/docs/spring-framework.png" width="80" height="80"> Spring Framework [](https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/actions/workflows/build-and-deploy-snapshot.yml?query=branch%3A6.0.x) [](https://ge.spring.io/scans?search.rootProjectNames=spring)
|
||||
# <img src="framework-docs/src/docs/spring-framework.png" width="80" height="80"> Spring Framework [](https://ci.spring.io/teams/spring-framework/pipelines/spring-framework-5.3.x?groups=Build") [](https://ge.spring.io/scans?search.rootProjectNames=spring)
|
||||
|
||||
This is the home of the Spring Framework: the foundation for all [Spring projects](https://spring.io/projects). Collectively the Spring Framework and the family of Spring projects are often referred to simply as "Spring".
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,10 +1,5 @@
|
||||
# Security Policy
|
||||
|
||||
## JAR signing
|
||||
|
||||
Spring Framework JARs released on Maven Central are signed.
|
||||
You'll find more information about the key here: https://spring.io/GPG-KEY-spring.txt
|
||||
|
||||
## Supported Versions
|
||||
|
||||
Please see the
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,14 +1,16 @@
|
||||
plugins {
|
||||
id 'io.spring.nohttp' version '0.0.11'
|
||||
id 'io.freefair.aspectj' version '8.0.1' apply false
|
||||
id 'io.spring.nohttp' version '0.0.10'
|
||||
id 'io.freefair.aspectj' version '6.5.0.3' apply false
|
||||
// kotlinVersion is managed in gradle.properties
|
||||
id 'org.jetbrains.kotlin.plugin.serialization' version "${kotlinVersion}" apply false
|
||||
id 'org.jetbrains.dokka' version '1.8.20'
|
||||
id 'org.jetbrains.dokka' version '1.7.20'
|
||||
id 'org.asciidoctor.jvm.convert' version '3.3.2' apply false
|
||||
id 'org.asciidoctor.jvm.pdf' version '3.3.2' apply false
|
||||
id 'org.unbroken-dome.xjc' version '2.0.0' apply false
|
||||
id 'com.github.ben-manes.versions' version '0.51.0'
|
||||
id 'com.github.johnrengelman.shadow' version '8.1.1' apply false
|
||||
id 'de.undercouch.download' version '5.4.0'
|
||||
id 'me.champeau.jmh' version '0.7.2' apply false
|
||||
id 'com.github.ben-manes.versions' version '0.42.0'
|
||||
id 'com.github.johnrengelman.shadow' version '7.1.2' apply false
|
||||
id 'de.undercouch.download' version '5.1.0'
|
||||
id 'me.champeau.jmh' version '0.6.6' apply false
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
ext {
|
||||
@@ -26,6 +28,7 @@ configure(allprojects) { project ->
|
||||
includeGroup 'io.projectreactor.netty'
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
maven { url "https://repo.spring.io/libs-spring-framework-build" }
|
||||
if (version.contains('-')) {
|
||||
maven { url "https://repo.spring.io/milestone" }
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -75,7 +78,7 @@ configure([rootProject] + javaProjects) { project ->
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
checkstyle {
|
||||
toolVersion = "10.12.7"
|
||||
toolVersion = "10.4"
|
||||
configDirectory.set(rootProject.file("src/checkstyle"))
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -102,35 +105,42 @@ configure([rootProject] + javaProjects) { project ->
|
||||
testRuntimeOnly("org.junit.platform:junit-platform-suite-engine")
|
||||
testRuntimeOnly("org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-core")
|
||||
testRuntimeOnly("org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-jul")
|
||||
testRuntimeOnly("org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-slf4j2-impl")
|
||||
testRuntimeOnly("org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-slf4j-impl")
|
||||
// JSR-305 only used for non-required meta-annotations
|
||||
compileOnly("com.google.code.findbugs:jsr305")
|
||||
testCompileOnly("com.google.code.findbugs:jsr305")
|
||||
checkstyle("io.spring.javaformat:spring-javaformat-checkstyle:0.0.41")
|
||||
checkstyle("io.spring.javaformat:spring-javaformat-checkstyle:0.0.31")
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
ext.javadocLinks = [
|
||||
"https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/17/docs/api/",
|
||||
"https://jakarta.ee/specifications/platform/9/apidocs/",
|
||||
"https://docs.jboss.org/hibernate/orm/5.6/javadocs/",
|
||||
"https://eclipse.dev/aspectj/doc/released/aspectj5rt-api",
|
||||
"https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E13222_01/wls/docs90/javadocs/", // CommonJ
|
||||
"https://www.ibm.com/docs/api/v1/content/SSEQTP_8.5.5/com.ibm.websphere.javadoc.doc/web/apidocs/",
|
||||
"https://docs.jboss.org/jbossas/javadoc/4.0.5/connector/",
|
||||
"https://docs.jboss.org/jbossas/javadoc/7.1.2.Final/",
|
||||
"https://www.eclipse.org/aspectj/doc/released/aspectj5rt-api/",
|
||||
"https://www.quartz-scheduler.org/api/2.3.0/",
|
||||
"https://www.javadoc.io/doc/com.fasterxml.jackson.core/jackson-core/2.14.1/",
|
||||
"https://www.javadoc.io/doc/com.fasterxml.jackson.core/jackson-databind/2.14.1/",
|
||||
"https://www.javadoc.io/doc/com.fasterxml.jackson.dataformat/jackson-dataformat-xml/2.14.1/",
|
||||
"https://fasterxml.github.io/jackson-core/javadoc/2.10/",
|
||||
"https://fasterxml.github.io/jackson-databind/javadoc/2.10/",
|
||||
"https://fasterxml.github.io/jackson-dataformat-xml/javadoc/2.10/",
|
||||
"https://hc.apache.org/httpcomponents-client-5.2.x/current/httpclient5/apidocs/",
|
||||
"https://projectreactor.io/docs/test/release/api/",
|
||||
"https://junit.org/junit4/javadoc/4.13.2/",
|
||||
// TODO Uncomment link to JUnit 5 docs once we execute Gradle with Java 18+.
|
||||
// See https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/issues/27497
|
||||
// TODO Uncomment link to JUnit 5 docs once we have sorted out
|
||||
// the following warning in the build.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// "https://junit.org/junit5/docs/5.9.3/api/",
|
||||
// warning: The code being documented uses packages in the unnamed module, but the packages defined in https://junit.org/junit5/docs/5.9.1/api/ are in named modules.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// "https://junit.org/junit5/docs/5.9.1/api/",
|
||||
"https://www.reactive-streams.org/reactive-streams-1.0.3-javadoc/",
|
||||
"https://javadoc.io/static/io.rsocket/rsocket-core/1.1.1/",
|
||||
"https://r2dbc.io/spec/1.0.0.RELEASE/api/",
|
||||
// Previously there could be a split-package issue between JSR250 and JSR305 javax.annotation packages,
|
||||
// but since 6.0 JSR 250 annotations such as @Resource and @PostConstruct have been replaced by their
|
||||
// JakartaEE equivalents in the jakarta.annotation package.
|
||||
// The external Javadoc link for JSR 305 must come last to ensure that types from
|
||||
// JSR 250 (such as @PostConstruct) are still supported. This is due to the fact
|
||||
// that JSR 250 and JSR 305 both define types in javax.annotation, which results
|
||||
// in a split package, and the javadoc tool does not support split packages
|
||||
// across multiple external Javadoc sites.
|
||||
"https://www.javadoc.io/doc/com.google.code.findbugs/jsr305/3.0.2/"
|
||||
] as String[]
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -143,10 +153,10 @@ configure(rootProject) {
|
||||
description = "Spring Framework"
|
||||
|
||||
apply plugin: "io.spring.nohttp"
|
||||
apply plugin: 'org.springframework.build.api-diff'
|
||||
|
||||
nohttp {
|
||||
source.exclude "**/test-output/**"
|
||||
source.exclude "**/.gradle/**"
|
||||
allowlistFile = project.file("src/nohttp/allowlist.lines")
|
||||
def rootPath = file(rootDir).toPath()
|
||||
def projectDirs = allprojects.collect { it.projectDir } + "${rootDir}/buildSrc"
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -22,6 +22,21 @@ but doesn't affect the classpath of dependent projects.
|
||||
This plugin does not provide a `provided` configuration, as the native `compileOnly` and `testCompileOnly`
|
||||
configurations are preferred.
|
||||
|
||||
### API Diff
|
||||
|
||||
This plugin uses the [Gradle JApiCmp](https://github.com/melix/japicmp-gradle-plugin) plugin
|
||||
to generate API Diff reports for each Spring Framework module. This plugin is applied once on the root
|
||||
project and creates tasks in each framework module. Unlike previous versions of this part of the build,
|
||||
there is no need for checking out a specific tag. The plugin will fetch the JARs we want to compare the
|
||||
current working version with. You can generate the reports for all modules or a single module:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
./gradlew apiDiff -PbaselineVersion=5.1.0.RELEASE
|
||||
./gradlew :spring-core:apiDiff -PbaselineVersion=5.1.0.RELEASE
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
The reports are located under `build/reports/api-diff/$OLDVERSION_to_$NEWVERSION/`.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### RuntimeHints Java Agent
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -19,11 +19,16 @@ ext {
|
||||
dependencies {
|
||||
implementation("org.jetbrains.kotlin:kotlin-gradle-plugin:${kotlinVersion}")
|
||||
implementation("org.jetbrains.kotlin:kotlin-compiler-embeddable:${kotlinVersion}")
|
||||
implementation "org.gradle:test-retry-gradle-plugin:1.5.6"
|
||||
implementation "me.champeau.gradle:japicmp-gradle-plugin:0.3.0"
|
||||
implementation "org.gradle:test-retry-gradle-plugin:1.4.1"
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
gradlePlugin {
|
||||
plugins {
|
||||
apiDiffPlugin {
|
||||
id = "org.springframework.build.api-diff"
|
||||
implementationClass = "org.springframework.build.api.ApiDiffPlugin"
|
||||
}
|
||||
conventionsPlugin {
|
||||
id = "org.springframework.build.conventions"
|
||||
implementationClass = "org.springframework.build.ConventionsPlugin"
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Copyright 2002-2023 the original author or authors.
|
||||
* Copyright 2002-2022 the original author or authors.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
|
||||
* you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
|
||||
@@ -26,8 +26,8 @@ import org.gradle.testretry.TestRetryTaskExtension;
|
||||
* Conventions that are applied in the presence of the {@link JavaBasePlugin}. When the
|
||||
* plugin is applied:
|
||||
* <ul>
|
||||
* <li>The {@link TestRetryPlugin Test Retry} plugin is applied so that flaky tests
|
||||
* are retried 3 times when running on the CI server.
|
||||
* <li>The {@link TestRetryPlugin Test Retry} plugins is applied so that flaky tests
|
||||
* are retried 3 times when running on the CI.
|
||||
* </ul>
|
||||
*
|
||||
* @author Brian Clozel
|
||||
@@ -40,8 +40,9 @@ class TestConventions {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
private void configureTestConventions(Project project) {
|
||||
project.getPlugins().apply(TestRetryPlugin.class);
|
||||
project.getTasks().withType(Test.class,
|
||||
test -> project.getPlugins().withType(TestRetryPlugin.class, testRetryPlugin -> {
|
||||
(test) -> project.getPlugins().withType(TestRetryPlugin.class, (testRetryPlugin) -> {
|
||||
TestRetryTaskExtension testRetry = test.getExtensions().getByType(TestRetryTaskExtension.class);
|
||||
testRetry.getFailOnPassedAfterRetry().set(true);
|
||||
testRetry.getMaxRetries().set(isCi() ? 3 : 0);
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,140 @@
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Copyright 2002-2019 the original author or authors.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
|
||||
* you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
|
||||
* You may obtain a copy of the License at
|
||||
*
|
||||
* https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
|
||||
* distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
|
||||
* WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
|
||||
* See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
|
||||
* limitations under the License.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
package org.springframework.build.api;
|
||||
|
||||
import java.io.File;
|
||||
import java.net.URI;
|
||||
import java.nio.file.Path;
|
||||
import java.nio.file.Paths;
|
||||
import java.util.Collections;
|
||||
import java.util.List;
|
||||
|
||||
import me.champeau.gradle.japicmp.JapicmpPlugin;
|
||||
import me.champeau.gradle.japicmp.JapicmpTask;
|
||||
import org.gradle.api.GradleException;
|
||||
import org.gradle.api.Plugin;
|
||||
import org.gradle.api.Project;
|
||||
import org.gradle.api.artifacts.Configuration;
|
||||
import org.gradle.api.artifacts.Dependency;
|
||||
import org.gradle.api.plugins.JavaBasePlugin;
|
||||
import org.gradle.api.plugins.JavaPlugin;
|
||||
import org.gradle.api.publish.maven.plugins.MavenPublishPlugin;
|
||||
import org.gradle.api.tasks.TaskProvider;
|
||||
import org.gradle.jvm.tasks.Jar;
|
||||
import org.slf4j.Logger;
|
||||
import org.slf4j.LoggerFactory;
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* {@link Plugin} that applies the {@code "japicmp-gradle-plugin"}
|
||||
* and create tasks for all subprojects named {@code "spring-*"}, diffing the public API one by one
|
||||
* and creating the reports in {@code "build/reports/api-diff/$OLDVERSION_to_$NEWVERSION/"}.
|
||||
* <p>{@code "./gradlew apiDiff -PbaselineVersion=5.1.0.RELEASE"} will output the
|
||||
* reports for the API diff between the baseline version and the current one for all modules.
|
||||
* You can limit the report to a single module with
|
||||
* {@code "./gradlew :spring-core:apiDiff -PbaselineVersion=5.1.0.RELEASE"}.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* @author Brian Clozel
|
||||
*/
|
||||
public class ApiDiffPlugin implements Plugin<Project> {
|
||||
|
||||
private static final Logger logger = LoggerFactory.getLogger(ApiDiffPlugin.class);
|
||||
|
||||
public static final String TASK_NAME = "apiDiff";
|
||||
|
||||
private static final String BASELINE_VERSION_PROPERTY = "baselineVersion";
|
||||
|
||||
private static final List<String> PACKAGE_INCLUDES = Collections.singletonList("org.springframework.*");
|
||||
|
||||
private static final URI SPRING_MILESTONE_REPOSITORY = URI.create("https://repo.spring.io/milestone");
|
||||
|
||||
@Override
|
||||
public void apply(Project project) {
|
||||
if (project.hasProperty(BASELINE_VERSION_PROPERTY) && project.equals(project.getRootProject())) {
|
||||
project.getPluginManager().apply(JapicmpPlugin.class);
|
||||
project.getPlugins().withType(JapicmpPlugin.class,
|
||||
plugin -> applyApiDiffConventions(project));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
private void applyApiDiffConventions(Project project) {
|
||||
String baselineVersion = project.property(BASELINE_VERSION_PROPERTY).toString();
|
||||
project.subprojects(subProject -> {
|
||||
if (subProject.getName().startsWith("spring-")) {
|
||||
createApiDiffTask(baselineVersion, subProject);
|
||||
}
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
private void createApiDiffTask(String baselineVersion, Project project) {
|
||||
if (isProjectEligible(project)) {
|
||||
// Add Spring Milestone repository for generating diffs against previous milestones
|
||||
project.getRootProject()
|
||||
.getRepositories()
|
||||
.maven(mavenArtifactRepository -> mavenArtifactRepository.setUrl(SPRING_MILESTONE_REPOSITORY));
|
||||
JapicmpTask apiDiff = project.getTasks().create(TASK_NAME, JapicmpTask.class);
|
||||
apiDiff.setDescription("Generates an API diff report with japicmp");
|
||||
apiDiff.setGroup(JavaBasePlugin.DOCUMENTATION_GROUP);
|
||||
|
||||
apiDiff.setOldClasspath(createBaselineConfiguration(baselineVersion, project));
|
||||
TaskProvider<Jar> jar = project.getTasks().withType(Jar.class).named("jar");
|
||||
apiDiff.setNewArchives(project.getLayout().files(jar.get().getArchiveFile().get().getAsFile()));
|
||||
apiDiff.setNewClasspath(getRuntimeClassPath(project));
|
||||
apiDiff.setPackageIncludes(PACKAGE_INCLUDES);
|
||||
apiDiff.setOnlyModified(true);
|
||||
apiDiff.setIgnoreMissingClasses(true);
|
||||
// Ignore Kotlin metadata annotations since they contain
|
||||
// illegal HTML characters and fail the report generation
|
||||
apiDiff.setAnnotationExcludes(Collections.singletonList("@kotlin.Metadata"));
|
||||
|
||||
apiDiff.setHtmlOutputFile(getOutputFile(baselineVersion, project));
|
||||
|
||||
apiDiff.dependsOn(project.getTasks().getByName("jar"));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
private boolean isProjectEligible(Project project) {
|
||||
return project.getPlugins().hasPlugin(JavaPlugin.class)
|
||||
&& project.getPlugins().hasPlugin(MavenPublishPlugin.class);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
private Configuration createBaselineConfiguration(String baselineVersion, Project project) {
|
||||
String baseline = String.join(":",
|
||||
project.getGroup().toString(), project.getName(), baselineVersion);
|
||||
Dependency baselineDependency = project.getDependencies().create(baseline + "@jar");
|
||||
Configuration baselineConfiguration = project.getRootProject().getConfigurations().detachedConfiguration(baselineDependency);
|
||||
try {
|
||||
// eagerly resolve the baseline configuration to check whether this is a new Spring module
|
||||
baselineConfiguration.resolve();
|
||||
return baselineConfiguration;
|
||||
}
|
||||
catch (GradleException exception) {
|
||||
logger.warn("Could not resolve {} - assuming this is a new Spring module.", baseline);
|
||||
}
|
||||
return project.getRootProject().getConfigurations().detachedConfiguration();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
private Configuration getRuntimeClassPath(Project project) {
|
||||
return project.getConfigurations().getByName(JavaPlugin.RUNTIME_CLASSPATH_CONFIGURATION_NAME);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
private File getOutputFile(String baseLineVersion, Project project) {
|
||||
Path outDir = Paths.get(project.getRootProject().getBuildDir().getAbsolutePath(),
|
||||
"reports", "api-diff",
|
||||
baseLineVersion + "_to_" + project.getRootProject().getVersion());
|
||||
return project.file(outDir.resolve(project.getName() + ".html").toString());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -1,7 +1,5 @@
|
||||
== Spring Framework Concourse pipeline
|
||||
|
||||
NOTE: CI is being migrated to GitHub Actions.
|
||||
|
||||
The Spring Framework uses https://concourse-ci.org/[Concourse] for its CI build and other automated tasks.
|
||||
The Spring team has a dedicated Concourse instance available at https://ci.spring.io with a build pipeline
|
||||
for https://ci.spring.io/teams/spring-framework/pipelines/spring-framework-6.0.x[Spring Framework 6.0.x].
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -17,4 +17,4 @@ changelog:
|
||||
- "type: dependency-upgrade"
|
||||
contributors:
|
||||
exclude:
|
||||
names: ["bclozel", "jhoeller", "poutsma", "rstoyanchev", "sbrannen", "sdeleuze", "snicoll", "simonbasle"]
|
||||
names: ["bclozel", "jhoeller", "poutsma", "rstoyanchev", "sbrannen", "sdeleuze", "snicoll"]
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
|
||||
FROM ubuntu:jammy-20240125
|
||||
FROM ubuntu:focal-20220922
|
||||
|
||||
ADD setup.sh /setup.sh
|
||||
ADD get-jdk-url.sh /get-jdk-url.sh
|
||||
@@ -6,5 +6,7 @@ RUN ./setup.sh
|
||||
|
||||
ENV JAVA_HOME /opt/openjdk/java17
|
||||
ENV JDK17 /opt/openjdk/java17
|
||||
ENV JDK18 /opt/openjdk/java18
|
||||
ENV JDK19 /opt/openjdk/java19
|
||||
|
||||
ENV PATH $JAVA_HOME/bin:$PATH
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -3,7 +3,13 @@ set -e
|
||||
|
||||
case "$1" in
|
||||
java17)
|
||||
echo "https://github.com/bell-sw/Liberica/releases/download/17.0.10%2B13/bellsoft-jdk17.0.10+13-linux-amd64.tar.gz"
|
||||
echo "https://github.com/bell-sw/Liberica/releases/download/17.0.5+8/bellsoft-jdk17.0.5+8-linux-amd64.tar.gz"
|
||||
;;
|
||||
java18)
|
||||
echo "https://github.com/bell-sw/Liberica/releases/download/18.0.2.1%2B1/bellsoft-jdk18.0.2.1+1-linux-amd64.tar.gz"
|
||||
;;
|
||||
java19)
|
||||
echo "https://github.com/bell-sw/Liberica/releases/download/19.0.1%2B11/bellsoft-jdk19.0.1+11-linux-amd64.tar.gz"
|
||||
;;
|
||||
*)
|
||||
echo $"Unknown java version"
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ curl https://raw.githubusercontent.com/spring-io/concourse-java-scripts/v0.0.4/c
|
||||
|
||||
mkdir -p /opt/openjdk
|
||||
pushd /opt/openjdk > /dev/null
|
||||
for jdk in java17
|
||||
for jdk in java17 java18 java19
|
||||
do
|
||||
JDK_URL=$( /get-jdk-url.sh $jdk )
|
||||
mkdir $jdk
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -3,8 +3,12 @@ github-repo-name: "spring-projects/spring-framework"
|
||||
sonatype-staging-profile: "org.springframework"
|
||||
docker-hub-organization: "springci"
|
||||
artifactory-server: "https://repo.spring.io"
|
||||
branch: "6.0.x"
|
||||
branch: "main"
|
||||
milestone: "6.0.x"
|
||||
build-name: "spring-framework"
|
||||
pipeline-name: "spring-framework"
|
||||
concourse-url: "https://ci.spring.io"
|
||||
registry-mirror-host: docker.repo.spring.io
|
||||
registry-mirror-username: ((artifactory-username))
|
||||
registry-mirror-password: ((artifactory-password))
|
||||
task-timeout: 1h00m
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -5,7 +5,9 @@ anchors:
|
||||
password: ((github-ci-release-token))
|
||||
branch: ((branch))
|
||||
gradle-enterprise-task-params: &gradle-enterprise-task-params
|
||||
DEVELOCITY_ACCESS_KEY: ((gradle_enterprise_secret_access_key))
|
||||
GRADLE_ENTERPRISE_ACCESS_KEY: ((gradle_enterprise_secret_access_key))
|
||||
GRADLE_ENTERPRISE_CACHE_USERNAME: ((gradle_enterprise_cache_user.username))
|
||||
GRADLE_ENTERPRISE_CACHE_PASSWORD: ((gradle_enterprise_cache_user.password))
|
||||
sonatype-task-params: &sonatype-task-params
|
||||
SONATYPE_USERNAME: ((sonatype-username))
|
||||
SONATYPE_PASSWORD: ((sonatype-password))
|
||||
@@ -21,6 +23,19 @@ anchors:
|
||||
docker-resource-source: &docker-resource-source
|
||||
username: ((docker-hub-username))
|
||||
password: ((docker-hub-password))
|
||||
tag: ((milestone))
|
||||
registry-mirror-vars: ®istry-mirror-vars
|
||||
registry-mirror-host: ((registry-mirror-host))
|
||||
registry-mirror-username: ((registry-mirror-username))
|
||||
registry-mirror-password: ((registry-mirror-password))
|
||||
slack-fail-params: &slack-fail-params
|
||||
text: >
|
||||
:concourse-failed: <https://ci.spring.io/teams/${BUILD_TEAM_NAME}/pipelines/${BUILD_PIPELINE_NAME}/jobs/${BUILD_JOB_NAME}/builds/${BUILD_NAME}|${BUILD_PIPELINE_NAME} ${BUILD_JOB_NAME} failed!>
|
||||
[$TEXT_FILE_CONTENT]
|
||||
text_file: git-repo/build/build-scan-uri.txt
|
||||
silent: true
|
||||
icon_emoji: ":concourse:"
|
||||
username: concourse-ci
|
||||
changelog-task-params: &changelog-task-params
|
||||
name: generated-changelog/tag
|
||||
tag: generated-changelog/tag
|
||||
@@ -33,27 +48,33 @@ resource_types:
|
||||
- name: registry-image
|
||||
type: registry-image
|
||||
source:
|
||||
<<: *docker-resource-source
|
||||
repository: concourse/registry-image-resource
|
||||
tag: 1.8.0
|
||||
tag: 1.5.0
|
||||
- name: artifactory-resource
|
||||
type: registry-image
|
||||
source:
|
||||
<<: *docker-resource-source
|
||||
repository: springio/artifactory-resource
|
||||
tag: 0.0.18
|
||||
tag: 0.0.17
|
||||
- name: github-release
|
||||
type: registry-image
|
||||
source:
|
||||
<<: *docker-resource-source
|
||||
repository: concourse/github-release-resource
|
||||
tag: 1.8.0
|
||||
tag: 1.5.5
|
||||
- name: github-status-resource
|
||||
type: registry-image
|
||||
source:
|
||||
<<: *docker-resource-source
|
||||
repository: dpb587/github-status-resource
|
||||
tag: master
|
||||
- name: pull-request
|
||||
type: registry-image
|
||||
source:
|
||||
repository: teliaoss/github-pr-resource
|
||||
tag: v0.23.0
|
||||
- name: slack-notification
|
||||
type: registry-image
|
||||
source:
|
||||
repository: cfcommunity/slack-notification-resource
|
||||
tag: latest
|
||||
resources:
|
||||
- name: git-repo
|
||||
type: git
|
||||
@@ -73,7 +94,13 @@ resources:
|
||||
source:
|
||||
<<: *docker-resource-source
|
||||
repository: ((docker-hub-organization))/spring-framework-ci
|
||||
tag: ((milestone))
|
||||
- name: every-morning
|
||||
type: time
|
||||
icon: alarm
|
||||
source:
|
||||
start: 8:00 AM
|
||||
stop: 9:00 AM
|
||||
location: Europe/Vienna
|
||||
- name: artifactory-repo
|
||||
type: artifactory-resource
|
||||
icon: package-variant
|
||||
@@ -82,6 +109,43 @@ resources:
|
||||
username: ((artifactory-username))
|
||||
password: ((artifactory-password))
|
||||
build_name: ((build-name))
|
||||
- name: git-pull-request
|
||||
type: pull-request
|
||||
icon: source-pull
|
||||
source:
|
||||
access_token: ((github-ci-pull-request-token))
|
||||
repository: ((github-repo-name))
|
||||
base_branch: ((branch))
|
||||
ignore_paths: ["ci/*"]
|
||||
- name: repo-status-build
|
||||
type: github-status-resource
|
||||
icon: eye-check-outline
|
||||
source:
|
||||
repository: ((github-repo-name))
|
||||
access_token: ((github-ci-status-token))
|
||||
branch: ((branch))
|
||||
context: build
|
||||
- name: repo-status-jdk18-build
|
||||
type: github-status-resource
|
||||
icon: eye-check-outline
|
||||
source:
|
||||
repository: ((github-repo-name))
|
||||
access_token: ((github-ci-status-token))
|
||||
branch: ((branch))
|
||||
context: jdk18-build
|
||||
- name: repo-status-jdk19-build
|
||||
type: github-status-resource
|
||||
icon: eye-check-outline
|
||||
source:
|
||||
repository: ((github-repo-name))
|
||||
access_token: ((github-ci-status-token))
|
||||
branch: ((branch))
|
||||
context: jdk19-build
|
||||
- name: slack-alert
|
||||
type: slack-notification
|
||||
icon: slack
|
||||
source:
|
||||
url: ((slack-webhook-url))
|
||||
- name: github-pre-release
|
||||
type: github-release
|
||||
icon: briefcase-download-outline
|
||||
@@ -112,27 +176,41 @@ jobs:
|
||||
image: ci-image
|
||||
vars:
|
||||
ci-image-name: ci-image
|
||||
<<: *docker-resource-source
|
||||
<<: *registry-mirror-vars
|
||||
- put: ci-image
|
||||
params:
|
||||
image: ci-image/image.tar
|
||||
- name: stage-milestone
|
||||
- name: build
|
||||
serial: true
|
||||
public: true
|
||||
plan:
|
||||
- get: ci-image
|
||||
- get: git-repo
|
||||
trigger: false
|
||||
- task: stage
|
||||
image: ci-image
|
||||
file: git-repo/ci/tasks/stage-version.yml
|
||||
params:
|
||||
RELEASE_TYPE: M
|
||||
<<: *gradle-enterprise-task-params
|
||||
trigger: true
|
||||
- put: repo-status-build
|
||||
params: { state: "pending", commit: "git-repo" }
|
||||
- do:
|
||||
- task: build-project
|
||||
image: ci-image
|
||||
file: git-repo/ci/tasks/build-project.yml
|
||||
privileged: true
|
||||
timeout: ((task-timeout))
|
||||
params:
|
||||
<<: *build-project-task-params
|
||||
on_failure:
|
||||
do:
|
||||
- put: repo-status-build
|
||||
params: { state: "failure", commit: "git-repo" }
|
||||
- put: slack-alert
|
||||
params:
|
||||
<<: *slack-fail-params
|
||||
- put: repo-status-build
|
||||
params: { state: "success", commit: "git-repo" }
|
||||
- put: artifactory-repo
|
||||
params: &artifactory-params
|
||||
signing_key: ((signing-key))
|
||||
signing_passphrase: ((signing-passphrase))
|
||||
repo: libs-staging-local
|
||||
repo: libs-snapshot-local
|
||||
folder: distribution-repository
|
||||
build_uri: "https://ci.spring.io/teams/${BUILD_TEAM_NAME}/pipelines/${BUILD_PIPELINE_NAME}/jobs/${BUILD_JOB_NAME}/builds/${BUILD_NAME}"
|
||||
build_number: "${BUILD_PIPELINE_NAME}-${BUILD_JOB_NAME}-${BUILD_NAME}"
|
||||
@@ -157,9 +235,114 @@ jobs:
|
||||
- "/**/framework-docs-*-schema.zip"
|
||||
properties:
|
||||
"zip.type": "schema"
|
||||
- put: git-repo
|
||||
params:
|
||||
repository: stage-git-repo
|
||||
get_params:
|
||||
threads: 8
|
||||
- name: jdk18-build
|
||||
serial: true
|
||||
public: true
|
||||
plan:
|
||||
- get: ci-image
|
||||
- get: git-repo
|
||||
- get: every-morning
|
||||
trigger: true
|
||||
- put: repo-status-jdk18-build
|
||||
params: { state: "pending", commit: "git-repo" }
|
||||
- do:
|
||||
- task: check-project
|
||||
image: ci-image
|
||||
file: git-repo/ci/tasks/check-project.yml
|
||||
privileged: true
|
||||
timeout: ((task-timeout))
|
||||
params:
|
||||
TEST_TOOLCHAIN: 18
|
||||
<<: *build-project-task-params
|
||||
on_failure:
|
||||
do:
|
||||
- put: repo-status-jdk18-build
|
||||
params: { state: "failure", commit: "git-repo" }
|
||||
- put: slack-alert
|
||||
params:
|
||||
<<: *slack-fail-params
|
||||
- put: repo-status-jdk18-build
|
||||
params: { state: "success", commit: "git-repo" }
|
||||
- name: jdk19-build
|
||||
serial: true
|
||||
public: true
|
||||
plan:
|
||||
- get: ci-image
|
||||
- get: git-repo
|
||||
- get: every-morning
|
||||
trigger: true
|
||||
- put: repo-status-jdk19-build
|
||||
params: { state: "pending", commit: "git-repo" }
|
||||
- do:
|
||||
- task: check-project
|
||||
image: ci-image
|
||||
file: git-repo/ci/tasks/check-project.yml
|
||||
privileged: true
|
||||
timeout: ((task-timeout))
|
||||
params:
|
||||
TEST_TOOLCHAIN: 19
|
||||
<<: *build-project-task-params
|
||||
on_failure:
|
||||
do:
|
||||
- put: repo-status-jdk19-build
|
||||
params: { state: "failure", commit: "git-repo" }
|
||||
- put: slack-alert
|
||||
params:
|
||||
<<: *slack-fail-params
|
||||
- put: repo-status-jdk19-build
|
||||
params: { state: "success", commit: "git-repo" }
|
||||
- name: build-pull-requests
|
||||
serial: true
|
||||
public: true
|
||||
plan:
|
||||
- get: ci-image
|
||||
- get: git-repo
|
||||
resource: git-pull-request
|
||||
trigger: true
|
||||
version: every
|
||||
- do:
|
||||
- put: git-pull-request
|
||||
params:
|
||||
path: git-repo
|
||||
status: pending
|
||||
- task: build-pr
|
||||
image: ci-image
|
||||
file: git-repo/ci/tasks/build-pr.yml
|
||||
privileged: true
|
||||
timeout: ((task-timeout))
|
||||
params:
|
||||
BRANCH: ((branch))
|
||||
on_success:
|
||||
put: git-pull-request
|
||||
params:
|
||||
path: git-repo
|
||||
status: success
|
||||
on_failure:
|
||||
put: git-pull-request
|
||||
params:
|
||||
path: git-repo
|
||||
status: failure
|
||||
- name: stage-milestone
|
||||
serial: true
|
||||
plan:
|
||||
- get: ci-image
|
||||
- get: git-repo
|
||||
trigger: false
|
||||
- task: stage
|
||||
image: ci-image
|
||||
file: git-repo/ci/tasks/stage-version.yml
|
||||
params:
|
||||
RELEASE_TYPE: M
|
||||
<<: *gradle-enterprise-task-params
|
||||
- put: artifactory-repo
|
||||
params:
|
||||
<<: *artifactory-params
|
||||
repo: libs-staging-local
|
||||
- put: git-repo
|
||||
params:
|
||||
repository: stage-git-repo
|
||||
- name: promote-milestone
|
||||
serial: true
|
||||
plan:
|
||||
@@ -182,7 +365,6 @@ jobs:
|
||||
params:
|
||||
RELEASE_TYPE: M
|
||||
<<: *github-task-params
|
||||
<<: *docker-resource-source
|
||||
- put: github-pre-release
|
||||
params:
|
||||
<<: *changelog-task-params
|
||||
@@ -201,6 +383,7 @@ jobs:
|
||||
- put: artifactory-repo
|
||||
params:
|
||||
<<: *artifactory-params
|
||||
repo: libs-staging-local
|
||||
- put: git-repo
|
||||
params:
|
||||
repository: stage-git-repo
|
||||
@@ -220,7 +403,6 @@ jobs:
|
||||
file: git-repo/ci/tasks/promote-version.yml
|
||||
params:
|
||||
RELEASE_TYPE: RC
|
||||
<<: *docker-resource-source
|
||||
<<: *artifactory-task-params
|
||||
- task: generate-changelog
|
||||
file: git-repo/ci/tasks/generate-changelog.yml
|
||||
@@ -245,6 +427,7 @@ jobs:
|
||||
- put: artifactory-repo
|
||||
params:
|
||||
<<: *artifactory-params
|
||||
repo: libs-staging-local
|
||||
- put: git-repo
|
||||
params:
|
||||
repository: stage-git-repo
|
||||
@@ -264,7 +447,6 @@ jobs:
|
||||
file: git-repo/ci/tasks/promote-version.yml
|
||||
params:
|
||||
RELEASE_TYPE: RELEASE
|
||||
<<: *docker-resource-source
|
||||
<<: *artifactory-task-params
|
||||
<<: *sonatype-task-params
|
||||
- name: create-github-release
|
||||
@@ -282,14 +464,17 @@ jobs:
|
||||
file: git-repo/ci/tasks/generate-changelog.yml
|
||||
params:
|
||||
RELEASE_TYPE: RELEASE
|
||||
<<: *docker-resource-source
|
||||
<<: *github-task-params
|
||||
- put: github-release
|
||||
params:
|
||||
<<: *changelog-task-params
|
||||
|
||||
groups:
|
||||
- name: "builds"
|
||||
jobs: ["build", "jdk18-build", "jdk19-build"]
|
||||
- name: "releases"
|
||||
jobs: ["stage-milestone", "stage-rc", "stage-release", "promote-milestone", "promote-rc", "promote-release", "create-github-release"]
|
||||
- name: "ci-images"
|
||||
jobs: ["build-ci-images"]
|
||||
- name: "pull-requests"
|
||||
jobs: [ "build-pull-requests" ]
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
|
||||
#!/bin/bash
|
||||
set -e
|
||||
|
||||
source $(dirname $0)/common.sh
|
||||
|
||||
pushd git-repo > /dev/null
|
||||
./gradlew -Dorg.gradle.internal.launcher.welcomeMessageEnabled=false --no-daemon --max-workers=4 check
|
||||
popd > /dev/null
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
|
||||
#!/bin/bash
|
||||
set -e
|
||||
|
||||
source $(dirname $0)/common.sh
|
||||
repository=$(pwd)/distribution-repository
|
||||
|
||||
pushd git-repo > /dev/null
|
||||
./gradlew -Dorg.gradle.internal.launcher.welcomeMessageEnabled=false --no-daemon --max-workers=4 -PdeploymentRepository=${repository} build publishAllPublicationsToDeploymentRepository
|
||||
popd > /dev/null
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
|
||||
#!/bin/bash
|
||||
set -e
|
||||
|
||||
source $(dirname $0)/common.sh
|
||||
|
||||
pushd git-repo > /dev/null
|
||||
./gradlew -Dorg.gradle.internal.launcher.welcomeMessageEnabled=false -Porg.gradle.java.installations.fromEnv=JDK17,JDK18 \
|
||||
-PmainToolchain=${MAIN_TOOLCHAIN} -PtestToolchain=${TEST_TOOLCHAIN} --no-daemon --max-workers=4 check
|
||||
popd > /dev/null
|
||||
@@ -5,8 +5,10 @@ image_resource:
|
||||
source:
|
||||
repository: concourse/oci-build-task
|
||||
tag: 0.10.0
|
||||
username: ((docker-hub-username))
|
||||
password: ((docker-hub-password))
|
||||
registry_mirror:
|
||||
host: ((registry-mirror-host))
|
||||
username: ((registry-mirror-username))
|
||||
password: ((registry-mirror-password))
|
||||
inputs:
|
||||
- name: ci-images-git-repo
|
||||
outputs:
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
platform: linux
|
||||
inputs:
|
||||
- name: git-repo
|
||||
caches:
|
||||
- path: gradle
|
||||
params:
|
||||
BRANCH:
|
||||
CI: true
|
||||
GRADLE_ENTERPRISE_ACCESS_KEY:
|
||||
GRADLE_ENTERPRISE_CACHE_USERNAME:
|
||||
GRADLE_ENTERPRISE_CACHE_PASSWORD:
|
||||
GRADLE_ENTERPRISE_URL: https://ge.spring.io
|
||||
run:
|
||||
path: bash
|
||||
args:
|
||||
- -ec
|
||||
- |
|
||||
${PWD}/git-repo/ci/scripts/build-pr.sh
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
platform: linux
|
||||
inputs:
|
||||
- name: git-repo
|
||||
outputs:
|
||||
- name: distribution-repository
|
||||
- name: git-repo
|
||||
caches:
|
||||
- path: gradle
|
||||
params:
|
||||
BRANCH:
|
||||
CI: true
|
||||
GRADLE_ENTERPRISE_ACCESS_KEY:
|
||||
GRADLE_ENTERPRISE_CACHE_USERNAME:
|
||||
GRADLE_ENTERPRISE_CACHE_PASSWORD:
|
||||
GRADLE_ENTERPRISE_URL: https://ge.spring.io
|
||||
run:
|
||||
path: bash
|
||||
args:
|
||||
- -ec
|
||||
- |
|
||||
${PWD}/git-repo/ci/scripts/build-project.sh
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
platform: linux
|
||||
inputs:
|
||||
- name: git-repo
|
||||
outputs:
|
||||
- name: distribution-repository
|
||||
- name: git-repo
|
||||
caches:
|
||||
- path: gradle
|
||||
params:
|
||||
BRANCH:
|
||||
CI: true
|
||||
MAIN_TOOLCHAIN:
|
||||
TEST_TOOLCHAIN:
|
||||
GRADLE_ENTERPRISE_ACCESS_KEY:
|
||||
GRADLE_ENTERPRISE_CACHE_USERNAME:
|
||||
GRADLE_ENTERPRISE_CACHE_PASSWORD:
|
||||
GRADLE_ENTERPRISE_URL: https://ge.spring.io
|
||||
run:
|
||||
path: bash
|
||||
args:
|
||||
- -ec
|
||||
- |
|
||||
${PWD}/git-repo/ci/scripts/check-project.sh
|
||||
@@ -5,8 +5,6 @@ image_resource:
|
||||
source:
|
||||
repository: springio/github-changelog-generator
|
||||
tag: '0.0.8'
|
||||
username: ((docker-hub-username))
|
||||
password: ((docker-hub-password))
|
||||
inputs:
|
||||
- name: git-repo
|
||||
- name: artifactory-repo
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -4,9 +4,7 @@ image_resource:
|
||||
type: registry-image
|
||||
source:
|
||||
repository: springio/concourse-release-scripts
|
||||
tag: '0.4.0'
|
||||
username: ((docker-hub-username))
|
||||
password: ((docker-hub-password))
|
||||
tag: '0.3.4'
|
||||
inputs:
|
||||
- name: git-repo
|
||||
- name: artifactory-repo
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,39 +0,0 @@
|
||||
antora:
|
||||
extensions:
|
||||
- require: '@springio/antora-extensions'
|
||||
root_component_name: 'framework'
|
||||
site:
|
||||
title: Spring Framework
|
||||
url: https://docs.spring.io/spring-framework/reference
|
||||
robots: allow
|
||||
git:
|
||||
ensure_git_suffix: false
|
||||
content:
|
||||
sources:
|
||||
- url: https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework
|
||||
# Refname matching:
|
||||
# https://docs.antora.org/antora/latest/playbook/content-refname-matching/
|
||||
branches: ['main', '{6..9}.+({0..9}).x']
|
||||
tags: ['v{6..9}.+({0..9}).+({0..9})?(-{RC,M}*)', '!(v6.0.{0..8})', '!(v6.0.0-{RC,M}{0..9})']
|
||||
start_path: framework-docs
|
||||
asciidoc:
|
||||
extensions:
|
||||
- '@asciidoctor/tabs'
|
||||
- '@springio/asciidoctor-extensions'
|
||||
- '@springio/asciidoctor-extensions/include-code-extension'
|
||||
attributes:
|
||||
page-stackoverflow-url: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/spring
|
||||
page-pagination: ''
|
||||
hide-uri-scheme: '@'
|
||||
tabs-sync-option: '@'
|
||||
include-java: 'example$docs-src/main/java/org/springframework/docs'
|
||||
urls:
|
||||
latest_version_segment_strategy: redirect:to
|
||||
latest_version_segment: ''
|
||||
redirect_facility: httpd
|
||||
runtime:
|
||||
log:
|
||||
failure_level: warn
|
||||
ui:
|
||||
bundle:
|
||||
url: https://github.com/spring-io/antora-ui-spring/releases/download/v0.4.15/ui-bundle.zip
|
||||
@@ -1,32 +0,0 @@
|
||||
name: framework
|
||||
version: true
|
||||
title: Spring Framework
|
||||
nav:
|
||||
- modules/ROOT/nav.adoc
|
||||
ext:
|
||||
collector:
|
||||
run:
|
||||
command: gradlew -q -PbuildSrc.skipTests=true "-Dorg.gradle.jvmargs=-Xmx3g -XX:+HeapDumpOnOutOfMemoryError" :framework-docs:generateAntoraResources
|
||||
local: true
|
||||
scan:
|
||||
dir: ./build/generated-antora-resources
|
||||
|
||||
asciidoc:
|
||||
attributes:
|
||||
attribute-missing: 'warn'
|
||||
# FIXME: the copyright is not removed
|
||||
# FIXME: The package is not renamed
|
||||
chomp: 'all'
|
||||
include-java: 'example$docs-src/main/java/org/springframework/docs'
|
||||
spring-framework-main-code: 'https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/tree/main'
|
||||
docs-site: 'https://docs.spring.io'
|
||||
docs-spring: "{docs-site}/spring-framework/docs/{spring-version}"
|
||||
docs-spring-framework: '{docs-site}/spring-framework/docs/{spring-version}'
|
||||
api-spring-framework: '{docs-spring-framework}/javadoc-api/org/springframework'
|
||||
docs-graalvm: 'https://www.graalvm.org/22.3/reference-manual'
|
||||
docs-spring-boot: '{docs-site}/spring-boot/docs/current/reference'
|
||||
docs-spring-gemfire: '{docs-site}/spring-gemfire/docs/current/reference'
|
||||
docs-spring-security: '{docs-site}/spring-security/reference'
|
||||
gh-rsocket: 'https://github.com/rsocket'
|
||||
gh-rsocket-extensions: '{gh-rsocket}/rsocket/blob/master/Extensions'
|
||||
gh-rsocket-java: '{gh-rsocket}/rsocket-java{gh-rsocket}/rsocket-java'
|
||||
@@ -1,39 +1,27 @@
|
||||
plugins {
|
||||
id 'kotlin'
|
||||
id 'io.spring.antora.generate-antora-yml' version '0.0.1'
|
||||
id 'org.antora' version '1.0.0'
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
description = "Spring Framework Docs"
|
||||
|
||||
apply plugin: 'kotlin'
|
||||
apply plugin: 'org.asciidoctor.jvm.convert'
|
||||
apply plugin: 'org.asciidoctor.jvm.pdf'
|
||||
apply from: "${rootDir}/gradle/publications.gradle"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
antora {
|
||||
options = [clean: true, fetch: !project.gradle.startParameter.offline, stacktrace: true]
|
||||
environment = [
|
||||
'BUILD_REFNAME': 'HEAD',
|
||||
'BUILD_VERSION': project.version,
|
||||
]
|
||||
configurations {
|
||||
asciidoctorExtensions
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
dependencies {
|
||||
api(project(":spring-context"))
|
||||
api(project(":spring-web"))
|
||||
|
||||
tasks.named("generateAntoraYml") {
|
||||
asciidocAttributes = project.provider( {
|
||||
return ["spring-version": project.version ]
|
||||
} )
|
||||
implementation(project(":spring-core-test"))
|
||||
implementation("org.assertj:assertj-core")
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
tasks.create("generateAntoraResources") {
|
||||
dependsOn 'generateAntoraYml'
|
||||
checkstyle {
|
||||
sourceSets = []
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Commented out for now:
|
||||
// https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/issues/30481
|
||||
// tasks.named("check") {
|
||||
// dependsOn 'antora'
|
||||
// }
|
||||
|
||||
jar {
|
||||
enabled = false
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -42,21 +30,16 @@ javadoc {
|
||||
enabled = false
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
dependencies {
|
||||
asciidoctorExtensions "io.spring.asciidoctor.backends:spring-asciidoctor-backends:0.0.3"
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
repositories {
|
||||
maven {
|
||||
url "https://repo.spring.io/release"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
dependencies {
|
||||
api(project(":spring-context"))
|
||||
api(project(":spring-web"))
|
||||
api("jakarta.servlet:jakarta.servlet-api")
|
||||
|
||||
implementation(project(":spring-core-test"))
|
||||
implementation("org.assertj:assertj-core")
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Produce Javadoc for all Spring Framework modules in "build/docs/javadoc"
|
||||
*/
|
||||
@@ -87,7 +70,7 @@ task api(type: Javadoc) {
|
||||
overview = "framework-docs/src/docs/api/overview.html"
|
||||
splitIndex = true
|
||||
links(project.ext.javadocLinks)
|
||||
addBooleanOption('Xdoclint:syntax,reference', true) // only check syntax and reference with doclint
|
||||
addBooleanOption('Xdoclint:syntax', true) // only check syntax with doclint
|
||||
addBooleanOption('Werror', true) // fail build on Javadoc warnings
|
||||
}
|
||||
source moduleProjects.collect { project ->
|
||||
@@ -108,10 +91,64 @@ rootProject.tasks.dokkaHtmlMultiModule.configure {
|
||||
outputDirectory.set(project.file("$buildDir/docs/kdoc"))
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
asciidoctorj {
|
||||
version = '2.4.3'
|
||||
fatalWarnings ".*"
|
||||
options doctype: 'book', eruby: 'erubis'
|
||||
attributes([
|
||||
icons: 'font',
|
||||
idprefix: '',
|
||||
idseparator: '-',
|
||||
revnumber: project.version,
|
||||
sectanchors: '',
|
||||
sectnums: '',
|
||||
'spring-version': project.version
|
||||
])
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Zip all Java docs (javadoc & kdoc) into a single archive
|
||||
* Generate the Spring Framework Reference documentation from
|
||||
* "src/docs/asciidoc" in "build/docs/ref-docs/html5".
|
||||
*/
|
||||
task docsZip(type: Zip, dependsOn: ['api', rootProject.tasks.dokkaHtmlMultiModule]) {
|
||||
asciidoctor {
|
||||
baseDirFollowsSourceDir()
|
||||
configurations "asciidoctorExtensions"
|
||||
sources {
|
||||
include '*.adoc'
|
||||
}
|
||||
outputDir "$buildDir/docs/ref-docs/html5"
|
||||
outputOptions {
|
||||
backends "spring-html"
|
||||
}
|
||||
logDocuments = true
|
||||
resources {
|
||||
from(sourceDir) {
|
||||
include 'images/*.png'
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Generate the Spring Framework Reference documentation from "src/docs/asciidoc"
|
||||
* in "build/docs/ref-docs/pdf".
|
||||
*/
|
||||
asciidoctorPdf {
|
||||
baseDirFollowsSourceDir()
|
||||
configurations 'asciidoctorExtensions'
|
||||
sources {
|
||||
include 'spring-framework.adocbook'
|
||||
}
|
||||
outputDir "$buildDir/docs/ref-docs/pdf"
|
||||
forkOptions {
|
||||
jvmArgs += ["--add-opens", "java.base/sun.nio.ch=ALL-UNNAMED", "--add-opens", "java.base/java.io=ALL-UNNAMED"]
|
||||
}
|
||||
logDocuments = true
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Zip all docs (API and reference) into a single archive
|
||||
*/
|
||||
task docsZip(type: Zip, dependsOn: ['api', 'asciidoctor', 'asciidoctorPdf', rootProject.tasks.dokkaHtmlMultiModule]) {
|
||||
group = "Distribution"
|
||||
description = "Builds -${archiveClassifier} archive containing api and reference " +
|
||||
"for deployment at https://docs.spring.io/spring-framework/docs/."
|
||||
@@ -124,6 +161,12 @@ task docsZip(type: Zip, dependsOn: ['api', rootProject.tasks.dokkaHtmlMultiModul
|
||||
from (api) {
|
||||
into "javadoc-api"
|
||||
}
|
||||
from ("$asciidoctor.outputDir") {
|
||||
into "reference/html"
|
||||
}
|
||||
from ("$asciidoctorPdf.outputDir") {
|
||||
into "reference/pdf"
|
||||
}
|
||||
from (rootProject.tasks.dokkaHtmlMultiModule.outputDirectory) {
|
||||
into "kdoc-api"
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -204,6 +247,7 @@ task distZip(type: Zip, dependsOn: [docsZip, schemaZip]) {
|
||||
|
||||
distZip.mustRunAfter moduleProjects.check
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
publishing {
|
||||
publications {
|
||||
mavenJava(MavenPublication) {
|
||||
|
||||
|
Before Width: | Height: | Size: 8.7 KiB |
|
Before Width: | Height: | Size: 3.4 KiB |
|
Before Width: | Height: | Size: 2.5 KiB |
|
Before Width: | Height: | Size: 8.5 KiB |
|
Before Width: | Height: | Size: 78 KiB |
|
Before Width: | Height: | Size: 64 KiB |
|
Before Width: | Height: | Size: 63 KiB |
@@ -1,612 +0,0 @@
|
||||
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
|
||||
<!-- Generated by Microsoft Visio 11.0, SVG Export, v1.0 spring-overview.svg Page-1 -->
|
||||
|
||||
<svg
|
||||
xmlns:v="http://schemas.microsoft.com/visio/2003/SVGExtensions/"
|
||||
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
|
||||
xmlns:cc="http://creativecommons.org/ns#"
|
||||
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
|
||||
xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"
|
||||
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"
|
||||
xmlns:sodipodi="http://sodipodi.sourceforge.net/DTD/sodipodi-0.dtd"
|
||||
xmlns:inkscape="http://www.inkscape.org/namespaces/inkscape"
|
||||
width="6.4728541in"
|
||||
height="5.9522467in"
|
||||
viewBox="0 0 466.04561 428.56238"
|
||||
xml:space="preserve"
|
||||
class="st5"
|
||||
id="svg5499"
|
||||
version="1.1"
|
||||
inkscape:version="0.91 r13725"
|
||||
sodipodi:docname="mvc-splitted-contexts.svg"
|
||||
style="font-size:12px;overflow:visible;color-interpolation-filters:sRGB;fill:none;fill-rule:evenodd;stroke-linecap:square;stroke-miterlimit:3"
|
||||
inkscape:export-filename="/Users/seb/Workspace/spring-framework/src/asciidoc/images/mvc-splitted-contexts.png"
|
||||
inkscape:export-xdpi="90"
|
||||
inkscape:export-ydpi="90"><metadata
|
||||
id="metadata5713"><rdf:RDF><cc:Work
|
||||
rdf:about=""><dc:format>image/svg+xml</dc:format><dc:type
|
||||
rdf:resource="https://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage" /><dc:title></dc:title></cc:Work></rdf:RDF></metadata><defs
|
||||
id="defs5711"><marker
|
||||
inkscape:isstock="true"
|
||||
style="overflow:visible;"
|
||||
id="marker9162"
|
||||
refX="0.0"
|
||||
refY="0.0"
|
||||
orient="auto"
|
||||
inkscape:stockid="Arrow2Mend"><path
|
||||
transform="scale(0.6) rotate(180) translate(0,0)"
|
||||
d="M 8.7185878,4.0337352 L -2.2072895,0.016013256 L 8.7185884,-4.0017078 C 6.9730900,-1.6296469 6.9831476,1.6157441 8.7185878,4.0337352 z "
|
||||
style="fill-rule:evenodd;stroke-width:0.625;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke:#000000;stroke-opacity:1;fill:#000000;fill-opacity:1"
|
||||
id="path9164" /></marker><marker
|
||||
inkscape:isstock="true"
|
||||
style="overflow:visible;"
|
||||
id="marker8834"
|
||||
refX="0.0"
|
||||
refY="0.0"
|
||||
orient="auto"
|
||||
inkscape:stockid="Arrow2Mend"><path
|
||||
transform="scale(0.6) rotate(180) translate(0,0)"
|
||||
d="M 8.7185878,4.0337352 L -2.2072895,0.016013256 L 8.7185884,-4.0017078 C 6.9730900,-1.6296469 6.9831476,1.6157441 8.7185878,4.0337352 z "
|
||||
style="fill-rule:evenodd;stroke-width:0.625;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke:#000000;stroke-opacity:1;fill:#000000;fill-opacity:1"
|
||||
id="path8836" /></marker><marker
|
||||
inkscape:isstock="true"
|
||||
style="overflow:visible;"
|
||||
id="marker8518"
|
||||
refX="0.0"
|
||||
refY="0.0"
|
||||
orient="auto"
|
||||
inkscape:stockid="Arrow2Mend"><path
|
||||
transform="scale(0.6) rotate(180) translate(0,0)"
|
||||
d="M 8.7185878,4.0337352 L -2.2072895,0.016013256 L 8.7185884,-4.0017078 C 6.9730900,-1.6296469 6.9831476,1.6157441 8.7185878,4.0337352 z "
|
||||
style="fill-rule:evenodd;stroke-width:0.625;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke:#000000;stroke-opacity:1;fill:#000000;fill-opacity:1"
|
||||
id="path8520" /></marker><marker
|
||||
inkscape:isstock="true"
|
||||
style="overflow:visible;"
|
||||
id="marker8214"
|
||||
refX="0.0"
|
||||
refY="0.0"
|
||||
orient="auto"
|
||||
inkscape:stockid="Arrow2Mend"><path
|
||||
transform="scale(0.6) rotate(180) translate(0,0)"
|
||||
d="M 8.7185878,4.0337352 L -2.2072895,0.016013256 L 8.7185884,-4.0017078 C 6.9730900,-1.6296469 6.9831476,1.6157441 8.7185878,4.0337352 z "
|
||||
style="fill-rule:evenodd;stroke-width:0.625;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke:#000000;stroke-opacity:1;fill:#000000;fill-opacity:1"
|
||||
id="path8216" /></marker><marker
|
||||
inkscape:isstock="true"
|
||||
style="overflow:visible;"
|
||||
id="marker7922"
|
||||
refX="0.0"
|
||||
refY="0.0"
|
||||
orient="auto"
|
||||
inkscape:stockid="Arrow2Mend"><path
|
||||
transform="scale(0.6) rotate(180) translate(0,0)"
|
||||
d="M 8.7185878,4.0337352 L -2.2072895,0.016013256 L 8.7185884,-4.0017078 C 6.9730900,-1.6296469 6.9831476,1.6157441 8.7185878,4.0337352 z "
|
||||
style="fill-rule:evenodd;stroke-width:0.625;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke:#000000;stroke-opacity:1;fill:#000000;fill-opacity:1"
|
||||
id="path7924" /></marker><marker
|
||||
inkscape:isstock="true"
|
||||
style="overflow:visible;"
|
||||
id="marker7641"
|
||||
refX="0.0"
|
||||
refY="0.0"
|
||||
orient="auto"
|
||||
inkscape:stockid="Arrow2Mend"><path
|
||||
transform="scale(0.6) rotate(180) translate(0,0)"
|
||||
d="M 8.7185878,4.0337352 L -2.2072895,0.016013256 L 8.7185884,-4.0017078 C 6.9730900,-1.6296469 6.9831476,1.6157441 8.7185878,4.0337352 z "
|
||||
style="fill-rule:evenodd;stroke-width:0.625;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke:#000000;stroke-opacity:1;fill:#000000;fill-opacity:1"
|
||||
id="path7644" /></marker><marker
|
||||
inkscape:isstock="true"
|
||||
style="overflow:visible;"
|
||||
id="marker7373"
|
||||
refX="0.0"
|
||||
refY="0.0"
|
||||
orient="auto"
|
||||
inkscape:stockid="Arrow2Mend"><path
|
||||
transform="scale(0.6) rotate(180) translate(0,0)"
|
||||
d="M 8.7185878,4.0337352 L -2.2072895,0.016013256 L 8.7185884,-4.0017078 C 6.9730900,-1.6296469 6.9831476,1.6157441 8.7185878,4.0337352 z "
|
||||
style="fill-rule:evenodd;stroke-width:0.625;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke:#000000;stroke-opacity:1;fill:#000000;fill-opacity:1"
|
||||
id="path7375" /></marker><marker
|
||||
inkscape:isstock="true"
|
||||
style="overflow:visible;"
|
||||
id="marker7117"
|
||||
refX="0.0"
|
||||
refY="0.0"
|
||||
orient="auto"
|
||||
inkscape:stockid="Arrow2Mend"><path
|
||||
transform="scale(0.6) rotate(180) translate(0,0)"
|
||||
d="M 8.7185878,4.0337352 L -2.2072895,0.016013256 L 8.7185884,-4.0017078 C 6.9730900,-1.6296469 6.9831476,1.6157441 8.7185878,4.0337352 z "
|
||||
style="fill-rule:evenodd;stroke-width:0.625;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke:#000000;stroke-opacity:1;fill:#000000;fill-opacity:1"
|
||||
id="path7119" /></marker><marker
|
||||
inkscape:isstock="true"
|
||||
style="overflow:visible;"
|
||||
id="marker6873"
|
||||
refX="0.0"
|
||||
refY="0.0"
|
||||
orient="auto"
|
||||
inkscape:stockid="Arrow2Mend"><path
|
||||
transform="scale(0.6) rotate(180) translate(0,0)"
|
||||
d="M 8.7185878,4.0337352 L -2.2072895,0.016013256 L 8.7185884,-4.0017078 C 6.9730900,-1.6296469 6.9831476,1.6157441 8.7185878,4.0337352 z "
|
||||
style="fill-rule:evenodd;stroke-width:0.625;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke:#000000;stroke-opacity:1;fill:#000000;fill-opacity:1"
|
||||
id="path6875" /></marker><marker
|
||||
inkscape:isstock="true"
|
||||
style="overflow:visible;"
|
||||
id="marker6641"
|
||||
refX="0.0"
|
||||
refY="0.0"
|
||||
orient="auto"
|
||||
inkscape:stockid="Arrow2Mend"><path
|
||||
transform="scale(0.6) rotate(180) translate(0,0)"
|
||||
d="M 8.7185878,4.0337352 L -2.2072895,0.016013256 L 8.7185884,-4.0017078 C 6.9730900,-1.6296469 6.9831476,1.6157441 8.7185878,4.0337352 z "
|
||||
style="fill-rule:evenodd;stroke-width:0.625;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke:#000000;stroke-opacity:1;fill:#000000;fill-opacity:1"
|
||||
id="path6643" /></marker><marker
|
||||
inkscape:isstock="true"
|
||||
style="overflow:visible;"
|
||||
id="marker6421"
|
||||
refX="0.0"
|
||||
refY="0.0"
|
||||
orient="auto"
|
||||
inkscape:stockid="Arrow2Mend"><path
|
||||
transform="scale(0.6) rotate(180) translate(0,0)"
|
||||
d="M 8.7185878,4.0337352 L -2.2072895,0.016013256 L 8.7185884,-4.0017078 C 6.9730900,-1.6296469 6.9831476,1.6157441 8.7185878,4.0337352 z "
|
||||
style="fill-rule:evenodd;stroke-width:0.625;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke:#000000;stroke-opacity:1;fill:#000000;fill-opacity:1"
|
||||
id="path6423" /></marker><marker
|
||||
inkscape:isstock="true"
|
||||
style="overflow:visible;"
|
||||
id="marker6213"
|
||||
refX="0.0"
|
||||
refY="0.0"
|
||||
orient="auto"
|
||||
inkscape:stockid="Arrow2Mend"><path
|
||||
transform="scale(0.6) rotate(180) translate(0,0)"
|
||||
d="M 8.7185878,4.0337352 L -2.2072895,0.016013256 L 8.7185884,-4.0017078 C 6.9730900,-1.6296469 6.9831476,1.6157441 8.7185878,4.0337352 z "
|
||||
style="fill-rule:evenodd;stroke-width:0.625;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke:#000000;stroke-opacity:1;fill:#000000;fill-opacity:1"
|
||||
id="path6215" /></marker><marker
|
||||
inkscape:isstock="true"
|
||||
style="overflow:visible;"
|
||||
id="marker6017"
|
||||
refX="0.0"
|
||||
refY="0.0"
|
||||
orient="auto"
|
||||
inkscape:stockid="Arrow2Mend"><path
|
||||
transform="scale(0.6) rotate(180) translate(0,0)"
|
||||
d="M 8.7185878,4.0337352 L -2.2072895,0.016013256 L 8.7185884,-4.0017078 C 6.9730900,-1.6296469 6.9831476,1.6157441 8.7185878,4.0337352 z "
|
||||
style="fill-rule:evenodd;stroke-width:0.625;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke:#000000;stroke-opacity:1;fill:#000000;fill-opacity:1"
|
||||
id="path6019" /></marker><marker
|
||||
inkscape:isstock="true"
|
||||
style="overflow:visible;"
|
||||
id="marker5833"
|
||||
refX="0.0"
|
||||
refY="0.0"
|
||||
orient="auto"
|
||||
inkscape:stockid="Arrow2Mend"><path
|
||||
transform="scale(0.6) rotate(180) translate(0,0)"
|
||||
d="M 8.7185878,4.0337352 L -2.2072895,0.016013256 L 8.7185884,-4.0017078 C 6.9730900,-1.6296469 6.9831476,1.6157441 8.7185878,4.0337352 z "
|
||||
style="fill-rule:evenodd;stroke-width:0.625;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke:#000000;stroke-opacity:1;fill:#000000;fill-opacity:1"
|
||||
id="path5835" /></marker><marker
|
||||
inkscape:isstock="true"
|
||||
style="overflow:visible;"
|
||||
id="marker5661"
|
||||
refX="0.0"
|
||||
refY="0.0"
|
||||
orient="auto"
|
||||
inkscape:stockid="Arrow2Mend"><path
|
||||
transform="scale(0.6) rotate(180) translate(0,0)"
|
||||
d="M 8.7185878,4.0337352 L -2.2072895,0.016013256 L 8.7185884,-4.0017078 C 6.9730900,-1.6296469 6.9831476,1.6157441 8.7185878,4.0337352 z "
|
||||
style="fill-rule:evenodd;stroke-width:0.625;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke:#000000;stroke-opacity:1;fill:#000000;fill-opacity:1"
|
||||
id="path5663" /></marker><marker
|
||||
inkscape:isstock="true"
|
||||
style="overflow:visible;"
|
||||
id="marker5501"
|
||||
refX="0.0"
|
||||
refY="0.0"
|
||||
orient="auto"
|
||||
inkscape:stockid="Arrow2Mend"><path
|
||||
transform="scale(0.6) rotate(180) translate(0,0)"
|
||||
d="M 8.7185878,4.0337352 L -2.2072895,0.016013256 L 8.7185884,-4.0017078 C 6.9730900,-1.6296469 6.9831476,1.6157441 8.7185878,4.0337352 z "
|
||||
style="fill-rule:evenodd;stroke-width:0.625;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke:#000000;stroke-opacity:1;fill:#000000;fill-opacity:1"
|
||||
id="path5503" /></marker><marker
|
||||
inkscape:isstock="true"
|
||||
style="overflow:visible;"
|
||||
id="marker5353"
|
||||
refX="0.0"
|
||||
refY="0.0"
|
||||
orient="auto"
|
||||
inkscape:stockid="Arrow2Mend"><path
|
||||
transform="scale(0.6) rotate(180) translate(0,0)"
|
||||
d="M 8.7185878,4.0337352 L -2.2072895,0.016013256 L 8.7185884,-4.0017078 C 6.9730900,-1.6296469 6.9831476,1.6157441 8.7185878,4.0337352 z "
|
||||
style="fill-rule:evenodd;stroke-width:0.625;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke:#000000;stroke-opacity:1;fill:#000000;fill-opacity:1"
|
||||
id="path5355" /></marker><marker
|
||||
inkscape:isstock="true"
|
||||
style="overflow:visible;"
|
||||
id="marker5217"
|
||||
refX="0.0"
|
||||
refY="0.0"
|
||||
orient="auto"
|
||||
inkscape:stockid="Arrow2Mend"><path
|
||||
transform="scale(0.6) rotate(180) translate(0,0)"
|
||||
d="M 8.7185878,4.0337352 L -2.2072895,0.016013256 L 8.7185884,-4.0017078 C 6.9730900,-1.6296469 6.9831476,1.6157441 8.7185878,4.0337352 z "
|
||||
style="fill-rule:evenodd;stroke-width:0.625;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke:#000000;stroke-opacity:1;fill:#000000;fill-opacity:1"
|
||||
id="path5219" /></marker><marker
|
||||
inkscape:isstock="true"
|
||||
style="overflow:visible;"
|
||||
id="marker5093"
|
||||
refX="0.0"
|
||||
refY="0.0"
|
||||
orient="auto"
|
||||
inkscape:stockid="Arrow2Mend"><path
|
||||
transform="scale(0.6) rotate(180) translate(0,0)"
|
||||
d="M 8.7185878,4.0337352 L -2.2072895,0.016013256 L 8.7185884,-4.0017078 C 6.9730900,-1.6296469 6.9831476,1.6157441 8.7185878,4.0337352 z "
|
||||
style="fill-rule:evenodd;stroke-width:0.625;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke:#000000;stroke-opacity:1;fill:#000000;fill-opacity:1"
|
||||
id="path5095" /></marker><marker
|
||||
inkscape:isstock="true"
|
||||
style="overflow:visible;"
|
||||
id="marker4981"
|
||||
refX="0.0"
|
||||
refY="0.0"
|
||||
orient="auto"
|
||||
inkscape:stockid="Arrow2Mend"><path
|
||||
transform="scale(0.6) rotate(180) translate(0,0)"
|
||||
d="M 8.7185878,4.0337352 L -2.2072895,0.016013256 L 8.7185884,-4.0017078 C 6.9730900,-1.6296469 6.9831476,1.6157441 8.7185878,4.0337352 z "
|
||||
style="fill-rule:evenodd;stroke-width:0.625;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke:#000000;stroke-opacity:1;fill:#000000;fill-opacity:1"
|
||||
id="path4983" /></marker><marker
|
||||
inkscape:stockid="Arrow2Mend"
|
||||
orient="auto"
|
||||
refY="0.0"
|
||||
refX="0.0"
|
||||
id="Arrow2Mend"
|
||||
style="overflow:visible;"
|
||||
inkscape:isstock="true"
|
||||
inkscape:collect="always"><path
|
||||
id="path7394"
|
||||
style="fill-rule:evenodd;stroke-width:0.625;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke:#000000;stroke-opacity:1;fill:#000000;fill-opacity:1"
|
||||
d="M 8.7185878,4.0337352 L -2.2072895,0.016013256 L 8.7185884,-4.0017078 C 6.9730900,-1.6296469 6.9831476,1.6157441 8.7185878,4.0337352 z "
|
||||
transform="scale(0.6) rotate(180) translate(0,0)" /></marker><marker
|
||||
inkscape:stockid="Arrow2Lend"
|
||||
orient="auto"
|
||||
refY="0.0"
|
||||
refX="0.0"
|
||||
id="marker8121"
|
||||
style="overflow:visible;"
|
||||
inkscape:isstock="true"><path
|
||||
id="path8123"
|
||||
style="fill-rule:evenodd;stroke-width:0.625;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke:#000000;stroke-opacity:1;fill:#000000;fill-opacity:1"
|
||||
d="M 8.7185878,4.0337352 L -2.2072895,0.016013256 L 8.7185884,-4.0017078 C 6.9730900,-1.6296469 6.9831476,1.6157441 8.7185878,4.0337352 z "
|
||||
transform="scale(1.1) rotate(180) translate(1,0)" /></marker><marker
|
||||
inkscape:stockid="Arrow1Mend"
|
||||
orient="auto"
|
||||
refY="0.0"
|
||||
refX="0.0"
|
||||
id="marker8033"
|
||||
style="overflow:visible;"
|
||||
inkscape:isstock="true"><path
|
||||
id="path8035"
|
||||
d="M 0.0,0.0 L 5.0,-5.0 L -12.5,0.0 L 5.0,5.0 L 0.0,0.0 z "
|
||||
style="fill-rule:evenodd;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:1pt;stroke-opacity:1;fill:#000000;fill-opacity:1"
|
||||
transform="scale(0.4) rotate(180) translate(10,0)" /></marker><marker
|
||||
inkscape:stockid="Arrow1Mend"
|
||||
orient="auto"
|
||||
refY="0.0"
|
||||
refX="0.0"
|
||||
id="marker7957"
|
||||
style="overflow:visible;"
|
||||
inkscape:isstock="true"><path
|
||||
id="path7959"
|
||||
d="M 0.0,0.0 L 5.0,-5.0 L -12.5,0.0 L 5.0,5.0 L 0.0,0.0 z "
|
||||
style="fill-rule:evenodd;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:1pt;stroke-opacity:1;fill:#000000;fill-opacity:1"
|
||||
transform="scale(0.4) rotate(180) translate(10,0)" /></marker><marker
|
||||
inkscape:stockid="Arrow1Mend"
|
||||
orient="auto"
|
||||
refY="0.0"
|
||||
refX="0.0"
|
||||
id="Arrow1Mend"
|
||||
style="overflow:visible;"
|
||||
inkscape:isstock="true"><path
|
||||
id="path7376"
|
||||
d="M 0.0,0.0 L 5.0,-5.0 L -12.5,0.0 L 5.0,5.0 L 0.0,0.0 z "
|
||||
style="fill-rule:evenodd;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:1pt;stroke-opacity:1;fill:#000000;fill-opacity:1"
|
||||
transform="scale(0.4) rotate(180) translate(10,0)" /></marker><marker
|
||||
inkscape:stockid="Arrow2Lend"
|
||||
orient="auto"
|
||||
refY="0.0"
|
||||
refX="0.0"
|
||||
id="Arrow2Lend"
|
||||
style="overflow:visible;"
|
||||
inkscape:isstock="true"><path
|
||||
id="path7388"
|
||||
style="fill-rule:evenodd;stroke-width:0.625;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke:#000000;stroke-opacity:1"
|
||||
d="M 8.7185878,4.0337352 L -2.2072895,0.016013256 L 8.7185884,-4.0017078 C 6.9730900,-1.6296469 6.9831476,1.6157441 8.7185878,4.0337352 z "
|
||||
transform="scale(1.1) rotate(180) translate(1,0)" /></marker><marker
|
||||
inkscape:stockid="Arrow1Lend"
|
||||
orient="auto"
|
||||
refY="0.0"
|
||||
refX="0.0"
|
||||
id="Arrow1Lend"
|
||||
style="overflow:visible;"
|
||||
inkscape:isstock="true"><path
|
||||
id="path7370"
|
||||
d="M 0.0,0.0 L 5.0,-5.0 L -12.5,0.0 L 5.0,5.0 L 0.0,0.0 z "
|
||||
style="fill-rule:evenodd;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:1pt;stroke-opacity:1;fill:#000000;fill-opacity:1"
|
||||
transform="scale(0.8) rotate(180) translate(12.5,0)" /></marker></defs><sodipodi:namedview
|
||||
pagecolor="#ffffff"
|
||||
bordercolor="#666666"
|
||||
borderopacity="1"
|
||||
objecttolerance="10"
|
||||
gridtolerance="10"
|
||||
guidetolerance="10"
|
||||
inkscape:pageopacity="0"
|
||||
inkscape:pageshadow="2"
|
||||
inkscape:window-width="1680"
|
||||
inkscape:window-height="1005"
|
||||
id="namedview5709"
|
||||
showgrid="false"
|
||||
inkscape:zoom="1.1640492"
|
||||
inkscape:cx="134.86698"
|
||||
inkscape:cy="203.59898"
|
||||
inkscape:window-x="84"
|
||||
inkscape:window-y="176"
|
||||
inkscape:window-maximized="0"
|
||||
inkscape:current-layer="g5503"
|
||||
fit-margin-top="0"
|
||||
fit-margin-left="0"
|
||||
fit-margin-right="0"
|
||||
fit-margin-bottom="0" /><v:documentProperties
|
||||
v:langID="1033"
|
||||
v:viewMarkup="false" /><style
|
||||
type="text/css"
|
||||
id="style5501"><![CDATA[
|
||||
.st1 {fill:#969696;stroke:#000000;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-width:0.24}
|
||||
.st2 {fill:#dde2cd;stroke:#000000;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-width:0.24}
|
||||
.st3 {fill:#000000;font-family:Arial;font-size:2.50001em;font-weight:bold}
|
||||
.st4 {font-size:0.333333em;font-weight:normal}
|
||||
.st5 {fill:none;fill-rule:evenodd;font-size:12;overflow:visible;stroke-linecap:square;stroke-miterlimit:3}
|
||||
]]></style><g
|
||||
v:mID="0"
|
||||
v:index="1"
|
||||
v:groupContext="foregroundPage"
|
||||
id="g5503"
|
||||
transform="matrix(0.99998201,0,0,1.0824094,-40.812382,-98.908648)"><rect
|
||||
style="fill:#dde2cd;fill-opacity:1;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:1.53790233;stroke-miterlimit:3;stroke-dasharray:none;stroke-opacity:1"
|
||||
id="rect6599"
|
||||
width="382.68423"
|
||||
height="146.09897"
|
||||
x="87.884865"
|
||||
y="148.26482" /><v:userDefs><v:ud
|
||||
v:nameU="SchemeName"
|
||||
v:val="VT4(Default)" /></v:userDefs><rect
|
||||
style="fill:none;fill-opacity:1;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:1.53790233;stroke-miterlimit:3;stroke-dasharray:none;stroke-opacity:1"
|
||||
id="rect5725"
|
||||
width="464.31128"
|
||||
height="374.11411"
|
||||
x="41.684383"
|
||||
y="112.3262" /><title
|
||||
id="title5505">Page-1</title><v:pageProperties
|
||||
v:drawingScale="0.0393701"
|
||||
v:pageScale="0.0393701"
|
||||
v:drawingUnits="24"
|
||||
v:shadowOffsetX="8.50394"
|
||||
v:shadowOffsetY="-8.50394" /><v:layer
|
||||
v:name="Connector"
|
||||
v:index="0" /><rect
|
||||
style="fill:#dde2cd;fill-opacity:1;fill-rule:evenodd;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:1.53790233;stroke-linecap:butt;stroke-linejoin:miter;stroke-miterlimit:3;stroke-dasharray:none;stroke-opacity:1"
|
||||
id="rect5715"
|
||||
width="322.8194"
|
||||
height="43.63184"
|
||||
x="119.95335"
|
||||
y="-135.66222"
|
||||
transform="scale(1,-1)" /><text
|
||||
xml:space="preserve"
|
||||
style="font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;font-stretch:normal;font-size:30.7580471px;line-height:125%;font-family:sans-serif;-inkscape-font-specification:sans-serif;letter-spacing:0px;word-spacing:0px;fill:#000000;fill-opacity:1;stroke:none;stroke-width:1px;stroke-linecap:butt;stroke-linejoin:miter;stroke-opacity:1"
|
||||
x="168.843"
|
||||
y="124.32391"
|
||||
id="text5717"
|
||||
sodipodi:linespacing="125%"
|
||||
transform="scale(1.0403984,0.96117025)"><tspan
|
||||
sodipodi:role="line"
|
||||
id="tspan5719"
|
||||
x="168.843"
|
||||
y="124.32391"
|
||||
style="font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;font-stretch:normal;font-size:23.06853676px;font-family:sans-serif;-inkscape-font-specification:sans-serif">DispatcherServlet</tspan></text>
|
||||
<text
|
||||
xml:space="preserve"
|
||||
style="font-style:normal;font-weight:normal;font-size:30.7580471px;line-height:125%;font-family:Sans;letter-spacing:0px;word-spacing:0px;fill:#000000;fill-opacity:1;stroke:none;stroke-width:1px;stroke-linecap:butt;stroke-linejoin:miter;stroke-opacity:1"
|
||||
x="89.770851"
|
||||
y="181.20923"
|
||||
id="text6589"
|
||||
sodipodi:linespacing="125%"
|
||||
transform="scale(1.0403984,0.96117025)"><tspan
|
||||
sodipodi:role="line"
|
||||
id="tspan6591"
|
||||
x="89.770851"
|
||||
y="181.20923"
|
||||
style="font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;font-stretch:normal;font-size:23.06853676px;font-family:sans-serif;-inkscape-font-specification:sans-serif">Servlet WebApplicationContext</tspan></text>
|
||||
<text
|
||||
xml:space="preserve"
|
||||
style="font-style:normal;font-weight:normal;font-size:30.7580471px;line-height:125%;font-family:Sans;letter-spacing:0px;word-spacing:0px;fill:#000000;fill-opacity:1;stroke:none;stroke-width:1px;stroke-linecap:butt;stroke-linejoin:miter;stroke-opacity:1"
|
||||
x="260.00443"
|
||||
y="198.41273"
|
||||
id="text6593"
|
||||
sodipodi:linespacing="125%"
|
||||
transform="scale(1.0403984,0.96117025)"><tspan
|
||||
sodipodi:role="line"
|
||||
id="tspan6595"
|
||||
x="260.00443"
|
||||
y="198.41273"
|
||||
style="font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;font-stretch:normal;font-size:11.53426838px;font-family:sans-serif;-inkscape-font-specification:sans-serif;text-align:center;text-anchor:middle">(containing controllers, view resolvers,</tspan><tspan
|
||||
sodipodi:role="line"
|
||||
x="260.00443"
|
||||
y="212.83057"
|
||||
style="font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;font-stretch:normal;font-size:11.53426838px;font-family:sans-serif;-inkscape-font-specification:sans-serif;text-align:center;text-anchor:middle"
|
||||
id="tspan6597">and other web-related beans)</tspan></text>
|
||||
<rect
|
||||
style="fill:#ffffff;fill-opacity:1;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:0.86203903;stroke-miterlimit:3;stroke-dasharray:none;stroke-opacity:1"
|
||||
id="rect6620"
|
||||
width="82.040657"
|
||||
height="36.72575"
|
||||
x="114.52653"
|
||||
y="-259.43161"
|
||||
transform="scale(1,-1)" /><rect
|
||||
style="fill:#ffffff;fill-opacity:1;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:0.89166164;stroke-miterlimit:3;stroke-dasharray:none;stroke-opacity:1"
|
||||
id="rect6622"
|
||||
width="87.843979"
|
||||
height="36.697304"
|
||||
x="223.39864"
|
||||
y="-287.19809"
|
||||
transform="scale(1,-1)" /><rect
|
||||
transform="scale(1,-1)"
|
||||
y="-264.81918"
|
||||
x="117.92834"
|
||||
height="36.72575"
|
||||
width="82.040657"
|
||||
id="rect6614"
|
||||
style="fill:#ffffff;fill-opacity:1;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:0.86203903;stroke-miterlimit:3;stroke-dasharray:none;stroke-opacity:1" /><text
|
||||
xml:space="preserve"
|
||||
style="font-style:normal;font-weight:normal;font-size:30.7580471px;line-height:125%;font-family:Sans;letter-spacing:0px;word-spacing:0px;fill:#000000;fill-opacity:1;stroke:none;stroke-width:1px;stroke-linecap:butt;stroke-linejoin:miter;stroke-opacity:1"
|
||||
x="121.24728"
|
||||
y="260.14957"
|
||||
id="text6616"
|
||||
sodipodi:linespacing="125%"
|
||||
transform="scale(1.0403984,0.96117025)"><tspan
|
||||
sodipodi:role="line"
|
||||
id="tspan6618"
|
||||
x="121.24728"
|
||||
y="260.14957"
|
||||
style="font-size:11.53426838px">Controllers</tspan></text>
|
||||
<text
|
||||
transform="scale(1.0403984,0.96117025)"
|
||||
sodipodi:linespacing="125%"
|
||||
id="text6624"
|
||||
y="282.70709"
|
||||
x="219.61203"
|
||||
style="font-style:normal;font-weight:normal;font-size:30.7580471px;line-height:125%;font-family:Sans;letter-spacing:0px;word-spacing:0px;fill:#000000;fill-opacity:1;stroke:none;stroke-width:1px;stroke-linecap:butt;stroke-linejoin:miter;stroke-opacity:1"
|
||||
xml:space="preserve"><tspan
|
||||
style="font-size:11.53426838px"
|
||||
y="282.70709"
|
||||
x="219.61203"
|
||||
id="tspan6626"
|
||||
sodipodi:role="line">ViewResolver</tspan></text>
|
||||
<rect
|
||||
transform="scale(1,-1)"
|
||||
y="-259.30249"
|
||||
x="332.5405"
|
||||
height="36.577778"
|
||||
width="114.4539"
|
||||
id="rect6628"
|
||||
style="fill:#ffffff;fill-opacity:1;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:1.0161339;stroke-miterlimit:3;stroke-dasharray:none;stroke-opacity:1" /><text
|
||||
xml:space="preserve"
|
||||
style="font-style:normal;font-weight:normal;font-size:30.7580471px;line-height:125%;font-family:Sans;letter-spacing:0px;word-spacing:0px;fill:#000000;fill-opacity:1;stroke:none;stroke-width:1px;stroke-linecap:butt;stroke-linejoin:miter;stroke-opacity:1"
|
||||
x="327.51276"
|
||||
y="255.28464"
|
||||
id="text6630"
|
||||
sodipodi:linespacing="125%"
|
||||
transform="scale(1.0403984,0.96117025)"><tspan
|
||||
sodipodi:role="line"
|
||||
id="tspan6632"
|
||||
x="327.51276"
|
||||
y="255.28464"
|
||||
style="font-size:11.53426838px">HandlerMapping</tspan></text>
|
||||
<rect
|
||||
y="338.69724"
|
||||
x="87.803261"
|
||||
height="121.5683"
|
||||
width="382.84744"
|
||||
id="rect6634"
|
||||
style="fill:#dde2cd;fill-opacity:1;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:1.53790233;stroke-miterlimit:3;stroke-dasharray:none;stroke-opacity:1" /><text
|
||||
transform="scale(1.0403984,0.96117025)"
|
||||
sodipodi:linespacing="125%"
|
||||
id="text6636"
|
||||
y="376.61673"
|
||||
x="108.61351"
|
||||
style="font-style:normal;font-weight:normal;font-size:30.7580471px;line-height:125%;font-family:Sans;letter-spacing:0px;word-spacing:0px;fill:#000000;fill-opacity:1;stroke:none;stroke-width:1px;stroke-linecap:butt;stroke-linejoin:miter;stroke-opacity:1"
|
||||
xml:space="preserve"><tspan
|
||||
style="font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;font-stretch:normal;font-size:23.06853676px;font-family:sans-serif;-inkscape-font-specification:sans-serif"
|
||||
y="376.61673"
|
||||
x="108.61351"
|
||||
id="tspan6638"
|
||||
sodipodi:role="line">Root WebApplicationContext</tspan></text>
|
||||
<text
|
||||
transform="scale(1.0403984,0.96117025)"
|
||||
sodipodi:linespacing="125%"
|
||||
id="text6640"
|
||||
y="395.35812"
|
||||
x="260.93863"
|
||||
style="font-style:normal;font-weight:normal;font-size:30.7580471px;line-height:125%;font-family:Sans;letter-spacing:0px;word-spacing:0px;fill:#000000;fill-opacity:1;stroke:none;stroke-width:1px;stroke-linecap:butt;stroke-linejoin:miter;stroke-opacity:1"
|
||||
xml:space="preserve"><tspan
|
||||
id="tspan6644"
|
||||
style="font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;font-stretch:normal;font-size:11.53426838px;font-family:sans-serif;-inkscape-font-specification:sans-serif;text-align:center;text-anchor:middle"
|
||||
y="395.35812"
|
||||
x="260.93863"
|
||||
sodipodi:role="line">(containing middle-tier services, datasources, etc.)</tspan></text>
|
||||
<rect
|
||||
transform="scale(1,-1)"
|
||||
y="-440.06805"
|
||||
x="164.32933"
|
||||
height="36.72575"
|
||||
width="82.040657"
|
||||
id="rect6648"
|
||||
style="fill:#ffffff;fill-opacity:1;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:0.86203903;stroke-miterlimit:3;stroke-dasharray:none;stroke-opacity:1" /><rect
|
||||
style="fill:#ffffff;fill-opacity:1;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:0.86203903;stroke-miterlimit:3;stroke-dasharray:none;stroke-opacity:1"
|
||||
id="rect6650"
|
||||
width="82.040657"
|
||||
height="36.72575"
|
||||
x="167.73116"
|
||||
y="-445.45563"
|
||||
transform="scale(1,-1)" /><text
|
||||
transform="scale(1.0403984,0.96117025)"
|
||||
sodipodi:linespacing="125%"
|
||||
id="text6652"
|
||||
y="448.55054"
|
||||
x="175.87148"
|
||||
style="font-style:normal;font-weight:normal;font-size:30.7580471px;line-height:125%;font-family:Sans;letter-spacing:0px;word-spacing:0px;fill:#000000;fill-opacity:1;stroke:none;stroke-width:1px;stroke-linecap:butt;stroke-linejoin:miter;stroke-opacity:1"
|
||||
xml:space="preserve"><tspan
|
||||
style="font-size:11.53426838px"
|
||||
y="448.55054"
|
||||
x="175.87148"
|
||||
id="tspan6654"
|
||||
sodipodi:role="line">Services</tspan></text>
|
||||
<rect
|
||||
style="fill:#ffffff;fill-opacity:1;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:0.88435173;stroke-miterlimit:3;stroke-dasharray:none;stroke-opacity:1"
|
||||
id="rect6656"
|
||||
width="86.393044"
|
||||
height="36.704323"
|
||||
x="306.86328"
|
||||
y="-439.60837"
|
||||
transform="scale(1,-1)" /><rect
|
||||
transform="scale(1,-1)"
|
||||
y="-444.99475"
|
||||
x="310.26624"
|
||||
height="36.701977"
|
||||
width="86.876686"
|
||||
id="rect6658"
|
||||
style="fill:#ffffff;fill-opacity:1;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:0.88679528;stroke-miterlimit:3;stroke-dasharray:none;stroke-opacity:1" /><text
|
||||
xml:space="preserve"
|
||||
style="font-style:normal;font-weight:normal;font-size:30.7580471px;line-height:125%;font-family:Sans;letter-spacing:0px;word-spacing:0px;fill:#000000;fill-opacity:1;stroke:none;stroke-width:1px;stroke-linecap:butt;stroke-linejoin:miter;stroke-opacity:1"
|
||||
x="305.30771"
|
||||
y="448.55054"
|
||||
id="text6660"
|
||||
sodipodi:linespacing="125%"
|
||||
transform="scale(1.0403984,0.96117025)"><tspan
|
||||
sodipodi:role="line"
|
||||
id="tspan6662"
|
||||
x="305.30771"
|
||||
y="448.55054"
|
||||
style="font-size:11.53426838px">Repositories</tspan></text>
|
||||
<path
|
||||
style="fill:none;fill-rule:evenodd;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:0.76895118px;stroke-linecap:butt;stroke-linejoin:miter;stroke-opacity:1"
|
||||
d="m 265.33234,295.60379 c 0,42.65169 0,42.65169 0,0 z"
|
||||
id="path7643"
|
||||
inkscape:connector-curvature="0" /><path
|
||||
style="fill:#000000;fill-opacity:1;fill-rule:evenodd;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:3.46028023;stroke-linecap:butt;stroke-linejoin:miter;stroke-miterlimit:3;stroke-dasharray:none;stroke-opacity:1;marker-end:url(#Arrow2Mend)"
|
||||
d="m 270.43505,294.70585 c 0,39.4721 0,39.87903 0,39.87903"
|
||||
id="path7645"
|
||||
inkscape:connector-curvature="0" /><text
|
||||
xml:space="preserve"
|
||||
style="font-style:normal;font-weight:normal;font-size:30.7580471px;line-height:125%;font-family:Sans;letter-spacing:0px;word-spacing:0px;fill:#000000;fill-opacity:1;stroke:none;stroke-width:1px;stroke-linecap:butt;stroke-linejoin:miter;stroke-opacity:1"
|
||||
x="352.55331"
|
||||
y="333.03622"
|
||||
id="text4963"
|
||||
sodipodi:linespacing="125%"
|
||||
transform="scale(1.0403984,0.96117025)"><tspan
|
||||
sodipodi:role="line"
|
||||
x="352.55331"
|
||||
y="333.03622"
|
||||
style="font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;font-stretch:normal;font-size:11.53426838px;font-family:sans-serif;-inkscape-font-specification:sans-serif;text-align:center;text-anchor:middle"
|
||||
id="tspan4965">Delegates if no bean found</tspan></text>
|
||||
</g></svg>
|
||||
|
Before Width: | Height: | Size: 30 KiB |
|
Before Width: | Height: | Size: 27 KiB |
|
Before Width: | Height: | Size: 82 KiB |
|
Before Width: | Height: | Size: 84 KiB |
|
Before Width: | Height: | Size: 102 KiB |
|
Before Width: | Height: | Size: 81 KiB |
|
Before Width: | Height: | Size: 39 KiB |
|
Before Width: | Height: | Size: 47 KiB |
@@ -1 +0,0 @@
|
||||
../../../src
|
||||
@@ -1,434 +0,0 @@
|
||||
* xref:overview.adoc[Overview]
|
||||
* xref:core.adoc[]
|
||||
** xref:core/beans.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:core/beans/introduction.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:core/beans/basics.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:core/beans/definition.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:core/beans/dependencies.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:core/beans/dependencies/factory-collaborators.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:core/beans/dependencies/factory-properties-detailed.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:core/beans/dependencies/factory-dependson.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:core/beans/dependencies/factory-lazy-init.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:core/beans/dependencies/factory-autowire.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:core/beans/dependencies/factory-method-injection.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:core/beans/factory-scopes.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:core/beans/factory-nature.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:core/beans/child-bean-definitions.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:core/beans/factory-extension.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:core/beans/annotation-config.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:core/beans/annotation-config/autowired.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:core/beans/annotation-config/autowired-primary.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:core/beans/annotation-config/autowired-qualifiers.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:core/beans/annotation-config/generics-as-qualifiers.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:core/beans/annotation-config/custom-autowire-configurer.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:core/beans/annotation-config/resource.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:core/beans/annotation-config/value-annotations.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:core/beans/annotation-config/postconstruct-and-predestroy-annotations.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:core/beans/classpath-scanning.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:core/beans/standard-annotations.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:core/beans/java.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:core/beans/java/basic-concepts.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:core/beans/java/instantiating-container.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:core/beans/java/bean-annotation.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:core/beans/java/configuration-annotation.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:core/beans/java/composing-configuration-classes.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:core/beans/environment.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:core/beans/context-load-time-weaver.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:core/beans/context-introduction.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:core/beans/beanfactory.adoc[]
|
||||
** xref:core/resources.adoc[]
|
||||
** xref:core/validation.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:core/validation/validator.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:core/validation/beans-beans.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:core/validation/conversion.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:core/validation/convert.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:core/validation/format.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:core/validation/format-configuring-formatting-globaldatetimeformat.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:core/validation/beanvalidation.adoc[]
|
||||
** xref:core/expressions.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:core/expressions/evaluation.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:core/expressions/beandef.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:core/expressions/language-ref.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:core/expressions/language-ref/literal.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:core/expressions/language-ref/properties-arrays.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:core/expressions/language-ref/inline-lists.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:core/expressions/language-ref/inline-maps.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:core/expressions/language-ref/array-construction.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:core/expressions/language-ref/methods.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:core/expressions/language-ref/operators.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:core/expressions/language-ref/types.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:core/expressions/language-ref/constructors.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:core/expressions/language-ref/variables.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:core/expressions/language-ref/functions.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:core/expressions/language-ref/bean-references.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:core/expressions/language-ref/operator-ternary.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:core/expressions/language-ref/operator-elvis.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:core/expressions/language-ref/operator-safe-navigation.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:core/expressions/language-ref/collection-selection.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:core/expressions/language-ref/collection-projection.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:core/expressions/language-ref/templating.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:core/expressions/example-classes.adoc[]
|
||||
** xref:core/aop.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:core/aop/introduction-defn.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:core/aop/introduction-spring-defn.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:core/aop/introduction-proxies.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:core/aop/ataspectj.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:core/aop/ataspectj/aspectj-support.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:core/aop/ataspectj/at-aspectj.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:core/aop/ataspectj/pointcuts.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:core/aop/ataspectj/advice.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:core/aop/ataspectj/introductions.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:core/aop/ataspectj/instantiation-models.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:core/aop/ataspectj/example.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:core/aop/schema.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:core/aop/choosing.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:core/aop/mixing-styles.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:core/aop/proxying.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:core/aop/aspectj-programmatic.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:core/aop/using-aspectj.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:core/aop/resources.adoc[]
|
||||
** xref:core/aop-api.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:core/aop-api/pointcuts.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:core/aop-api/advice.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:core/aop-api/advisor.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:core/aop-api/pfb.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:core/aop-api/concise-proxy.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:core/aop-api/prog.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:core/aop-api/advised.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:core/aop-api/autoproxy.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:core/aop-api/targetsource.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:core/aop-api/extensibility.adoc[]
|
||||
** xref:core/null-safety.adoc[]
|
||||
** xref:core/databuffer-codec.adoc[]
|
||||
** xref:core/spring-jcl.adoc[]
|
||||
** xref:core/aot.adoc[]
|
||||
** xref:core/appendix.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:core/appendix/xsd-schemas.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:core/appendix/xml-custom.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:core/appendix/application-startup-steps.adoc[]
|
||||
* xref:testing.adoc[]
|
||||
** xref:testing/introduction.adoc[]
|
||||
** xref:testing/unit.adoc[]
|
||||
** xref:testing/integration.adoc[]
|
||||
** xref:testing/support-jdbc.adoc[]
|
||||
** xref:testing/testcontext-framework.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:testing/testcontext-framework/key-abstractions.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:testing/testcontext-framework/bootstrapping.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:testing/testcontext-framework/tel-config.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:testing/testcontext-framework/application-events.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:testing/testcontext-framework/test-execution-events.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:testing/testcontext-framework/ctx-management.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:testing/testcontext-framework/ctx-management/xml.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:testing/testcontext-framework/ctx-management/groovy.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:testing/testcontext-framework/ctx-management/javaconfig.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:testing/testcontext-framework/ctx-management/mixed-config.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:testing/testcontext-framework/ctx-management/initializers.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:testing/testcontext-framework/ctx-management/inheritance.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:testing/testcontext-framework/ctx-management/env-profiles.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:testing/testcontext-framework/ctx-management/property-sources.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:testing/testcontext-framework/ctx-management/dynamic-property-sources.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:testing/testcontext-framework/ctx-management/web.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:testing/testcontext-framework/ctx-management/web-mocks.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:testing/testcontext-framework/ctx-management/caching.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:testing/testcontext-framework/ctx-management/hierarchies.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:testing/testcontext-framework/fixture-di.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:testing/testcontext-framework/web-scoped-beans.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:testing/testcontext-framework/tx.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:testing/testcontext-framework/executing-sql.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:testing/testcontext-framework/parallel-test-execution.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:testing/testcontext-framework/support-classes.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:testing/testcontext-framework/aot.adoc[]
|
||||
** xref:testing/webtestclient.adoc[]
|
||||
** xref:testing/spring-mvc-test-framework.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:testing/spring-mvc-test-framework/server.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:testing/spring-mvc-test-framework/server-static-imports.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:testing/spring-mvc-test-framework/server-setup-options.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:testing/spring-mvc-test-framework/server-setup-steps.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:testing/spring-mvc-test-framework/server-performing-requests.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:testing/spring-mvc-test-framework/server-defining-expectations.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:testing/spring-mvc-test-framework/async-requests.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:testing/spring-mvc-test-framework/vs-streaming-response.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:testing/spring-mvc-test-framework/server-filters.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:testing/spring-mvc-test-framework/vs-end-to-end-integration-tests.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:testing/spring-mvc-test-framework/server-resources.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:testing/spring-mvc-test-framework/server-htmlunit.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:testing/spring-mvc-test-framework/server-htmlunit/why.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:testing/spring-mvc-test-framework/server-htmlunit/mah.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:testing/spring-mvc-test-framework/server-htmlunit/webdriver.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:testing/spring-mvc-test-framework/server-htmlunit/geb.adoc[]
|
||||
** xref:testing/spring-mvc-test-client.adoc[]
|
||||
** xref:testing/appendix.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:testing/annotations.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:testing/annotations/integration-standard.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:testing/annotations/integration-spring.adoc[]
|
||||
***** xref:testing/annotations/integration-spring/annotation-bootstrapwith.adoc[]
|
||||
***** xref:testing/annotations/integration-spring/annotation-contextconfiguration.adoc[]
|
||||
***** xref:testing/annotations/integration-spring/annotation-webappconfiguration.adoc[]
|
||||
***** xref:testing/annotations/integration-spring/annotation-contexthierarchy.adoc[]
|
||||
***** xref:testing/annotations/integration-spring/annotation-activeprofiles.adoc[]
|
||||
***** xref:testing/annotations/integration-spring/annotation-testpropertysource.adoc[]
|
||||
***** xref:testing/annotations/integration-spring/annotation-dynamicpropertysource.adoc[]
|
||||
***** xref:testing/annotations/integration-spring/annotation-dirtiescontext.adoc[]
|
||||
***** xref:testing/annotations/integration-spring/annotation-testexecutionlisteners.adoc[]
|
||||
***** xref:testing/annotations/integration-spring/annotation-recordapplicationevents.adoc[]
|
||||
***** xref:testing/annotations/integration-spring/annotation-commit.adoc[]
|
||||
***** xref:testing/annotations/integration-spring/annotation-rollback.adoc[]
|
||||
***** xref:testing/annotations/integration-spring/annotation-beforetransaction.adoc[]
|
||||
***** xref:testing/annotations/integration-spring/annotation-aftertransaction.adoc[]
|
||||
***** xref:testing/annotations/integration-spring/annotation-sql.adoc[]
|
||||
***** xref:testing/annotations/integration-spring/annotation-sqlconfig.adoc[]
|
||||
***** xref:testing/annotations/integration-spring/annotation-sqlmergemode.adoc[]
|
||||
***** xref:testing/annotations/integration-spring/annotation-sqlgroup.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:testing/annotations/integration-junit4.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:testing/annotations/integration-junit-jupiter.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:testing/annotations/integration-meta.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:testing/resources.adoc[]
|
||||
* xref:data-access.adoc[]
|
||||
** xref:data-access/transaction.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:data-access/transaction/motivation.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:data-access/transaction/strategies.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:data-access/transaction/tx-resource-synchronization.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:data-access/transaction/declarative.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:data-access/transaction/declarative/tx-decl-explained.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:data-access/transaction/declarative/first-example.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:data-access/transaction/declarative/rolling-back.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:data-access/transaction/declarative/diff-tx.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:data-access/transaction/declarative/txadvice-settings.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:data-access/transaction/declarative/annotations.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:data-access/transaction/declarative/tx-propagation.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:data-access/transaction/declarative/applying-more-than-just-tx-advice.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:data-access/transaction/declarative/aspectj.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:data-access/transaction/programmatic.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:data-access/transaction/tx-decl-vs-prog.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:data-access/transaction/event.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:data-access/transaction/application-server-integration.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:data-access/transaction/solutions-to-common-problems.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:data-access/transaction/resources.adoc[]
|
||||
** xref:data-access/dao.adoc[]
|
||||
** xref:data-access/jdbc.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:data-access/jdbc/choose-style.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:data-access/jdbc/packages.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:data-access/jdbc/core.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:data-access/jdbc/connections.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:data-access/jdbc/advanced.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:data-access/jdbc/simple.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:data-access/jdbc/object.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:data-access/jdbc/parameter-handling.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:data-access/jdbc/embedded-database-support.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:data-access/jdbc/initializing-datasource.adoc[]
|
||||
** xref:data-access/r2dbc.adoc[]
|
||||
** xref:data-access/orm.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:data-access/orm/introduction.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:data-access/orm/general.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:data-access/orm/hibernate.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:data-access/orm/jpa.adoc[]
|
||||
** xref:data-access/oxm.adoc[]
|
||||
** xref:data-access/appendix.adoc[]
|
||||
* xref:web.adoc[]
|
||||
** xref:web/webmvc.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:web/webmvc/mvc-servlet.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:web/webmvc/mvc-servlet/context-hierarchy.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:web/webmvc/mvc-servlet/special-bean-types.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:web/webmvc/mvc-servlet/config.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:web/webmvc/mvc-servlet/container-config.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:web/webmvc/mvc-servlet/sequence.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:web/webmvc/mvc-servlet/handlermapping-path.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:web/webmvc/mvc-servlet/handlermapping-interceptor.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:web/webmvc/mvc-servlet/exceptionhandlers.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:web/webmvc/mvc-servlet/viewresolver.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:web/webmvc/mvc-servlet/localeresolver.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:web/webmvc/mvc-servlet/themeresolver.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:web/webmvc/mvc-servlet/multipart.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:web/webmvc/mvc-servlet/logging.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:web/webmvc/filters.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:web/webmvc/mvc-controller.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:web/webmvc/mvc-controller/ann.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:web/webmvc/mvc-controller/ann-requestmapping.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:web/webmvc/mvc-controller/ann-methods.adoc[]
|
||||
***** xref:web/webmvc/mvc-controller/ann-methods/arguments.adoc[]
|
||||
***** xref:web/webmvc/mvc-controller/ann-methods/return-types.adoc[]
|
||||
***** xref:web/webmvc/mvc-controller/ann-methods/typeconversion.adoc[]
|
||||
***** xref:web/webmvc/mvc-controller/ann-methods/matrix-variables.adoc[]
|
||||
***** xref:web/webmvc/mvc-controller/ann-methods/requestparam.adoc[]
|
||||
***** xref:web/webmvc/mvc-controller/ann-methods/requestheader.adoc[]
|
||||
***** xref:web/webmvc/mvc-controller/ann-methods/cookievalue.adoc[]
|
||||
***** xref:web/webmvc/mvc-controller/ann-methods/modelattrib-method-args.adoc[]
|
||||
***** xref:web/webmvc/mvc-controller/ann-methods/sessionattributes.adoc[]
|
||||
***** xref:web/webmvc/mvc-controller/ann-methods/sessionattribute.adoc[]
|
||||
***** xref:web/webmvc/mvc-controller/ann-methods/requestattrib.adoc[]
|
||||
***** xref:web/webmvc/mvc-controller/ann-methods/redirecting-passing-data.adoc[]
|
||||
***** xref:web/webmvc/mvc-controller/ann-methods/flash-attributes.adoc[]
|
||||
***** xref:web/webmvc/mvc-controller/ann-methods/multipart-forms.adoc[]
|
||||
***** xref:web/webmvc/mvc-controller/ann-methods/requestbody.adoc[]
|
||||
***** xref:web/webmvc/mvc-controller/ann-methods/httpentity.adoc[]
|
||||
***** xref:web/webmvc/mvc-controller/ann-methods/responsebody.adoc[]
|
||||
***** xref:web/webmvc/mvc-controller/ann-methods/responseentity.adoc[]
|
||||
***** xref:web/webmvc/mvc-controller/ann-methods/jackson.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:web/webmvc/mvc-controller/ann-modelattrib-methods.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:web/webmvc/mvc-controller/ann-initbinder.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:web/webmvc/mvc-controller/ann-exceptionhandler.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:web/webmvc/mvc-controller/ann-advice.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:web/webmvc-functional.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:web/webmvc/mvc-uri-building.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:web/webmvc/mvc-ann-async.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:web/webmvc-cors.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:web/webmvc/mvc-ann-rest-exceptions.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:web/webmvc/mvc-security.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:web/webmvc/mvc-caching.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:web/webmvc-view.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:web/webmvc-view/mvc-thymeleaf.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:web/webmvc-view/mvc-freemarker.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:web/webmvc-view/mvc-groovymarkup.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:web/webmvc-view/mvc-script.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:web/webmvc-view/mvc-jsp.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:web/webmvc-view/mvc-feeds.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:web/webmvc-view/mvc-document.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:web/webmvc-view/mvc-jackson.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:web/webmvc-view/mvc-xml-marshalling.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:web/webmvc-view/mvc-xslt.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:web/webmvc/mvc-config.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:web/webmvc/mvc-config/enable.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:web/webmvc/mvc-config/customize.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:web/webmvc/mvc-config/conversion.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:web/webmvc/mvc-config/validation.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:web/webmvc/mvc-config/interceptors.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:web/webmvc/mvc-config/content-negotiation.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:web/webmvc/mvc-config/message-converters.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:web/webmvc/mvc-config/view-controller.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:web/webmvc/mvc-config/view-resolvers.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:web/webmvc/mvc-config/static-resources.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:web/webmvc/mvc-config/default-servlet-handler.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:web/webmvc/mvc-config/path-matching.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:web/webmvc/mvc-config/advanced-java.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:web/webmvc/mvc-config/advanced-xml.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:web/webmvc/mvc-http2.adoc[]
|
||||
** xref:web/webmvc-client.adoc[]
|
||||
** xref:web/webmvc-test.adoc[]
|
||||
** xref:web/websocket.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:web/websocket/server.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:web/websocket/fallback.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:web/websocket/stomp.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:web/websocket/stomp/overview.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:web/websocket/stomp/benefits.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:web/websocket/stomp/enable.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:web/websocket/stomp/server-config.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:web/websocket/stomp/message-flow.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:web/websocket/stomp/handle-annotations.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:web/websocket/stomp/handle-send.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:web/websocket/stomp/handle-simple-broker.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:web/websocket/stomp/handle-broker-relay.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:web/websocket/stomp/handle-broker-relay-configure.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:web/websocket/stomp/destination-separator.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:web/websocket/stomp/authentication.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:web/websocket/stomp/authentication-token-based.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:web/websocket/stomp/authorization.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:web/websocket/stomp/user-destination.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:web/websocket/stomp/ordered-messages.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:web/websocket/stomp/application-context-events.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:web/websocket/stomp/interceptors.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:web/websocket/stomp/client.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:web/websocket/stomp/scope.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:web/websocket/stomp/configuration-performance.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:web/websocket/stomp/stats.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:web/websocket/stomp/testing.adoc[]
|
||||
** xref:web/integration.adoc[]
|
||||
* xref:web-reactive.adoc[]
|
||||
** xref:web/webflux.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:web/webflux/new-framework.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:web/webflux/reactive-spring.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:web/webflux/dispatcher-handler.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:web/webflux/controller.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:web/webflux/controller/ann.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:web/webflux/controller/ann-requestmapping.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:web/webflux/controller/ann-methods.adoc[]
|
||||
***** xref:web/webflux/controller/ann-methods/arguments.adoc[]
|
||||
***** xref:web/webflux/controller/ann-methods/return-types.adoc[]
|
||||
***** xref:web/webflux/controller/ann-methods/typeconversion.adoc[]
|
||||
***** xref:web/webflux/controller/ann-methods/matrix-variables.adoc[]
|
||||
***** xref:web/webflux/controller/ann-methods/requestparam.adoc[]
|
||||
***** xref:web/webflux/controller/ann-methods/requestheader.adoc[]
|
||||
***** xref:web/webflux/controller/ann-methods/cookievalue.adoc[]
|
||||
***** xref:web/webflux/controller/ann-methods/modelattrib-method-args.adoc[]
|
||||
***** xref:web/webflux/controller/ann-methods/sessionattributes.adoc[]
|
||||
***** xref:web/webflux/controller/ann-methods/sessionattribute.adoc[]
|
||||
***** xref:web/webflux/controller/ann-methods/requestattrib.adoc[]
|
||||
***** xref:web/webflux/controller/ann-methods/multipart-forms.adoc[]
|
||||
***** xref:web/webflux/controller/ann-methods/requestbody.adoc[]
|
||||
***** xref:web/webflux/controller/ann-methods/httpentity.adoc[]
|
||||
***** xref:web/webflux/controller/ann-methods/responsebody.adoc[]
|
||||
***** xref:web/webflux/controller/ann-methods/responseentity.adoc[]
|
||||
***** xref:web/webflux/controller/ann-methods/jackson.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:web/webflux/controller/ann-modelattrib-methods.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:web/webflux/controller/ann-initbinder.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:web/webflux/controller/ann-exceptions.adoc[]
|
||||
**** xref:web/webflux/controller/ann-advice.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:web/webflux-functional.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:web/webflux/uri-building.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:web/webflux-cors.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:web/webflux/ann-rest-exceptions.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:web/webflux/security.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:web/webflux/caching.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:web/webflux-view.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:web/webflux/config.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:web/webflux/http2.adoc[]
|
||||
** xref:web/webflux-webclient.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:web/webflux-webclient/client-builder.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:web/webflux-webclient/client-retrieve.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:web/webflux-webclient/client-exchange.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:web/webflux-webclient/client-body.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:web/webflux-webclient/client-filter.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:web/webflux-webclient/client-attributes.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:web/webflux-webclient/client-context.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:web/webflux-webclient/client-synchronous.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:web/webflux-webclient/client-testing.adoc[]
|
||||
** xref:web/webflux-http-interface-client.adoc[]
|
||||
** xref:web/webflux-websocket.adoc[]
|
||||
** xref:web/webflux-test.adoc[]
|
||||
** xref:rsocket.adoc[]
|
||||
** xref:web/webflux-reactive-libraries.adoc[]
|
||||
* xref:integration.adoc[]
|
||||
** xref:integration/rest-clients.adoc[]
|
||||
** xref:integration/jms.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:integration/jms/using.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:integration/jms/sending.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:integration/jms/receiving.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:integration/jms/jca-message-endpoint-manager.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:integration/jms/annotated.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:integration/jms/namespace.adoc[]
|
||||
** xref:integration/jmx.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:integration/jmx/exporting.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:integration/jmx/interface.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:integration/jmx/naming.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:integration/jmx/jsr160.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:integration/jmx/proxy.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:integration/jmx/notifications.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:integration/jmx/resources.adoc[]
|
||||
** xref:integration/email.adoc[]
|
||||
** xref:integration/scheduling.adoc[]
|
||||
** xref:integration/cache.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:integration/cache/strategies.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:integration/cache/annotations.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:integration/cache/jsr-107.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:integration/cache/declarative-xml.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:integration/cache/store-configuration.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:integration/cache/plug.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:integration/cache/specific-config.adoc[]
|
||||
** xref:integration/observability.adoc[]
|
||||
** xref:integration/appendix.adoc[]
|
||||
* xref:languages.adoc[]
|
||||
** xref:languages/kotlin.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:languages/kotlin/requirements.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:languages/kotlin/extensions.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:languages/kotlin/null-safety.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:languages/kotlin/classes-interfaces.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:languages/kotlin/annotations.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:languages/kotlin/bean-definition-dsl.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:languages/kotlin/web.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:languages/kotlin/coroutines.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:languages/kotlin/spring-projects-in.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:languages/kotlin/getting-started.adoc[]
|
||||
*** xref:languages/kotlin/resources.adoc[]
|
||||
** xref:languages/groovy.adoc[]
|
||||
** xref:languages/dynamic.adoc[]
|
||||
* xref:appendix.adoc[]
|
||||
* https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/wiki[Wiki]
|
||||
@@ -1,12 +0,0 @@
|
||||
[[aop-api]]
|
||||
= Spring AOP APIs
|
||||
:page-section-summary-toc: 1
|
||||
|
||||
The previous chapter described the Spring's support for AOP with @AspectJ and schema-based
|
||||
aspect definitions. In this chapter, we discuss the lower-level Spring AOP APIs. For common
|
||||
applications, we recommend the use of Spring AOP with AspectJ pointcuts as described in the
|
||||
previous chapter.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,592 +0,0 @@
|
||||
[[aop-api-advice]]
|
||||
= Advice API in Spring
|
||||
|
||||
Now we can examine how Spring AOP handles advice.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[aop-api-advice-lifecycle]]
|
||||
== Advice Lifecycles
|
||||
|
||||
Each advice is a Spring bean. An advice instance can be shared across all advised
|
||||
objects or be unique to each advised object. This corresponds to per-class or
|
||||
per-instance advice.
|
||||
|
||||
Per-class advice is used most often. It is appropriate for generic advice, such as
|
||||
transaction advisors. These do not depend on the state of the proxied object or add new
|
||||
state. They merely act on the method and arguments.
|
||||
|
||||
Per-instance advice is appropriate for introductions, to support mixins. In this case,
|
||||
the advice adds state to the proxied object.
|
||||
|
||||
You can use a mix of shared and per-instance advice in the same AOP proxy.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[aop-api-advice-types]]
|
||||
== Advice Types in Spring
|
||||
|
||||
Spring provides several advice types and is extensible to support
|
||||
arbitrary advice types. This section describes the basic concepts and standard advice types.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[aop-api-advice-around]]
|
||||
=== Interception Around Advice
|
||||
|
||||
The most fundamental advice type in Spring is interception around advice.
|
||||
|
||||
Spring is compliant with the AOP `Alliance` interface for around advice that uses method
|
||||
interception. Classes that implement `MethodInterceptor` and that implement around advice should also implement the
|
||||
following interface:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
public interface MethodInterceptor extends Interceptor {
|
||||
|
||||
Object invoke(MethodInvocation invocation) throws Throwable;
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
The `MethodInvocation` argument to the `invoke()` method exposes the method being
|
||||
invoked, the target join point, the AOP proxy, and the arguments to the method. The
|
||||
`invoke()` method should return the invocation's result: the return value of the join
|
||||
point.
|
||||
|
||||
The following example shows a simple `MethodInterceptor` implementation:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
public class DebugInterceptor implements MethodInterceptor {
|
||||
|
||||
public Object invoke(MethodInvocation invocation) throws Throwable {
|
||||
System.out.println("Before: invocation=[" + invocation + "]");
|
||||
Object rval = invocation.proceed();
|
||||
System.out.println("Invocation returned");
|
||||
return rval;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
class DebugInterceptor : MethodInterceptor {
|
||||
|
||||
override fun invoke(invocation: MethodInvocation): Any {
|
||||
println("Before: invocation=[$invocation]")
|
||||
val rval = invocation.proceed()
|
||||
println("Invocation returned")
|
||||
return rval
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
Note the call to the `proceed()` method of `MethodInvocation`. This proceeds down the
|
||||
interceptor chain towards the join point. Most interceptors invoke this method and
|
||||
return its return value. However, a `MethodInterceptor`, like any around advice, can
|
||||
return a different value or throw an exception rather than invoke the proceed method.
|
||||
However, you do not want to do this without good reason.
|
||||
|
||||
NOTE: `MethodInterceptor` implementations offer interoperability with other AOP Alliance-compliant AOP
|
||||
implementations. The other advice types discussed in the remainder of this section
|
||||
implement common AOP concepts but in a Spring-specific way. While there is an advantage
|
||||
in using the most specific advice type, stick with `MethodInterceptor` around advice if
|
||||
you are likely to want to run the aspect in another AOP framework. Note that pointcuts
|
||||
are not currently interoperable between frameworks, and the AOP Alliance does not
|
||||
currently define pointcut interfaces.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[aop-api-advice-before]]
|
||||
=== Before Advice
|
||||
|
||||
A simpler advice type is a before advice. This does not need a `MethodInvocation`
|
||||
object, since it is called only before entering the method.
|
||||
|
||||
The main advantage of a before advice is that there is no need to invoke the `proceed()`
|
||||
method and, therefore, no possibility of inadvertently failing to proceed down the
|
||||
interceptor chain.
|
||||
|
||||
The following listing shows the `MethodBeforeAdvice` interface:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
public interface MethodBeforeAdvice extends BeforeAdvice {
|
||||
|
||||
void before(Method m, Object[] args, Object target) throws Throwable;
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
(Spring's API design would allow for
|
||||
field before advice, although the usual objects apply to field interception and it is
|
||||
unlikely for Spring to ever implement it.)
|
||||
|
||||
Note that the return type is `void`. Before advice can insert custom behavior before the join
|
||||
point runs but cannot change the return value. If a before advice throws an
|
||||
exception, it stops further execution of the interceptor chain. The exception
|
||||
propagates back up the interceptor chain. If it is unchecked or on the signature of
|
||||
the invoked method, it is passed directly to the client. Otherwise, it is
|
||||
wrapped in an unchecked exception by the AOP proxy.
|
||||
|
||||
The following example shows a before advice in Spring, which counts all method invocations:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
public class CountingBeforeAdvice implements MethodBeforeAdvice {
|
||||
|
||||
private int count;
|
||||
|
||||
public void before(Method m, Object[] args, Object target) throws Throwable {
|
||||
++count;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public int getCount() {
|
||||
return count;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
class CountingBeforeAdvice : MethodBeforeAdvice {
|
||||
|
||||
var count: Int = 0
|
||||
|
||||
override fun before(m: Method, args: Array<Any>, target: Any?) {
|
||||
++count
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
TIP: Before advice can be used with any pointcut.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[aop-api-advice-throws]]
|
||||
=== Throws Advice
|
||||
|
||||
Throws advice is invoked after the return of the join point if the join point threw
|
||||
an exception. Spring offers typed throws advice. Note that this means that the
|
||||
`org.springframework.aop.ThrowsAdvice` interface does not contain any methods. It is a
|
||||
tag interface identifying that the given object implements one or more typed throws
|
||||
advice methods. These should be in the following form:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
afterThrowing([Method, args, target], subclassOfThrowable)
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Only the last argument is required. The method signatures may have either one or four
|
||||
arguments, depending on whether the advice method is interested in the method and
|
||||
arguments. The next two listing show classes that are examples of throws advice.
|
||||
|
||||
The following advice is invoked if a `RemoteException` is thrown (including from subclasses):
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
public class RemoteThrowsAdvice implements ThrowsAdvice {
|
||||
|
||||
public void afterThrowing(RemoteException ex) throws Throwable {
|
||||
// Do something with remote exception
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
class RemoteThrowsAdvice : ThrowsAdvice {
|
||||
|
||||
fun afterThrowing(ex: RemoteException) {
|
||||
// Do something with remote exception
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
Unlike the preceding
|
||||
advice, the next example declares four arguments, so that it has access to the invoked method, method
|
||||
arguments, and target object. The following advice is invoked if a `ServletException` is thrown:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
public class ServletThrowsAdviceWithArguments implements ThrowsAdvice {
|
||||
|
||||
public void afterThrowing(Method m, Object[] args, Object target, ServletException ex) {
|
||||
// Do something with all arguments
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
class ServletThrowsAdviceWithArguments : ThrowsAdvice {
|
||||
|
||||
fun afterThrowing(m: Method, args: Array<Any>, target: Any, ex: ServletException) {
|
||||
// Do something with all arguments
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
The final example illustrates how these two methods could be used in a single class
|
||||
that handles both `RemoteException` and `ServletException`. Any number of throws advice
|
||||
methods can be combined in a single class. The following listing shows the final example:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
public static class CombinedThrowsAdvice implements ThrowsAdvice {
|
||||
|
||||
public void afterThrowing(RemoteException ex) throws Throwable {
|
||||
// Do something with remote exception
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public void afterThrowing(Method m, Object[] args, Object target, ServletException ex) {
|
||||
// Do something with all arguments
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
class CombinedThrowsAdvice : ThrowsAdvice {
|
||||
|
||||
fun afterThrowing(ex: RemoteException) {
|
||||
// Do something with remote exception
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fun afterThrowing(m: Method, args: Array<Any>, target: Any, ex: ServletException) {
|
||||
// Do something with all arguments
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
NOTE: If a throws-advice method throws an exception itself, it overrides the
|
||||
original exception (that is, it changes the exception thrown to the user). The overriding
|
||||
exception is typically a RuntimeException, which is compatible with any method
|
||||
signature. However, if a throws-advice method throws a checked exception, it must
|
||||
match the declared exceptions of the target method and is, hence, to some degree
|
||||
coupled to specific target method signatures. _Do not throw an undeclared checked
|
||||
exception that is incompatible with the target method's signature!_
|
||||
|
||||
TIP: Throws advice can be used with any pointcut.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[aop-api-advice-after-returning]]
|
||||
=== After Returning Advice
|
||||
|
||||
An after returning advice in Spring must implement the
|
||||
`org.springframework.aop.AfterReturningAdvice` interface, which the following listing shows:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
public interface AfterReturningAdvice extends Advice {
|
||||
|
||||
void afterReturning(Object returnValue, Method m, Object[] args, Object target)
|
||||
throws Throwable;
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
An after returning advice has access to the return value (which it cannot modify),
|
||||
the invoked method, the method's arguments, and the target.
|
||||
|
||||
The following after returning advice counts all successful method invocations that have
|
||||
not thrown exceptions:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
public class CountingAfterReturningAdvice implements AfterReturningAdvice {
|
||||
|
||||
private int count;
|
||||
|
||||
public void afterReturning(Object returnValue, Method m, Object[] args, Object target)
|
||||
throws Throwable {
|
||||
++count;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public int getCount() {
|
||||
return count;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
class CountingAfterReturningAdvice : AfterReturningAdvice {
|
||||
|
||||
var count: Int = 0
|
||||
private set
|
||||
|
||||
override fun afterReturning(returnValue: Any?, m: Method, args: Array<Any>, target: Any?) {
|
||||
++count
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
This advice does not change the execution path. If it throws an exception, it is
|
||||
thrown up the interceptor chain instead of the return value.
|
||||
|
||||
TIP: After returning advice can be used with any pointcut.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[aop-api-advice-introduction]]
|
||||
=== Introduction Advice
|
||||
|
||||
Spring treats introduction advice as a special kind of interception advice.
|
||||
|
||||
Introduction requires an `IntroductionAdvisor` and an `IntroductionInterceptor` that
|
||||
implement the following interface:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
public interface IntroductionInterceptor extends MethodInterceptor {
|
||||
|
||||
boolean implementsInterface(Class intf);
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
The `invoke()` method inherited from the AOP Alliance `MethodInterceptor` interface must
|
||||
implement the introduction. That is, if the invoked method is on an introduced
|
||||
interface, the introduction interceptor is responsible for handling the method call -- it
|
||||
cannot invoke `proceed()`.
|
||||
|
||||
Introduction advice cannot be used with any pointcut, as it applies only at the class,
|
||||
rather than the method, level. You can only use introduction advice with the
|
||||
`IntroductionAdvisor`, which has the following methods:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
public interface IntroductionAdvisor extends Advisor, IntroductionInfo {
|
||||
|
||||
ClassFilter getClassFilter();
|
||||
|
||||
void validateInterfaces() throws IllegalArgumentException;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public interface IntroductionInfo {
|
||||
|
||||
Class<?>[] getInterfaces();
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
There is no `MethodMatcher` and, hence, no `Pointcut` associated with introduction
|
||||
advice. Only class filtering is logical.
|
||||
|
||||
The `getInterfaces()` method returns the interfaces introduced by this advisor.
|
||||
|
||||
The `validateInterfaces()` method is used internally to see whether or not the
|
||||
introduced interfaces can be implemented by the configured `IntroductionInterceptor`.
|
||||
|
||||
Consider an example from the Spring test suite and suppose we want to
|
||||
introduce the following interface to one or more objects:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
public interface Lockable {
|
||||
void lock();
|
||||
void unlock();
|
||||
boolean locked();
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
interface Lockable {
|
||||
fun lock()
|
||||
fun unlock()
|
||||
fun locked(): Boolean
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
This illustrates a mixin. We want to be able to cast advised objects to `Lockable`,
|
||||
whatever their type and call lock and unlock methods. If we call the `lock()` method, we
|
||||
want all setter methods to throw a `LockedException`. Thus, we can add an aspect that
|
||||
provides the ability to make objects immutable without them having any knowledge of it:
|
||||
a good example of AOP.
|
||||
|
||||
First, we need an `IntroductionInterceptor` that does the heavy lifting. In this
|
||||
case, we extend the `org.springframework.aop.support.DelegatingIntroductionInterceptor`
|
||||
convenience class. We could implement `IntroductionInterceptor` directly, but using
|
||||
`DelegatingIntroductionInterceptor` is best for most cases.
|
||||
|
||||
The `DelegatingIntroductionInterceptor` is designed to delegate an introduction to an
|
||||
actual implementation of the introduced interfaces, concealing the use of interception
|
||||
to do so. You can set the delegate to any object using a constructor argument. The
|
||||
default delegate (when the no-argument constructor is used) is `this`. Thus, in the next example,
|
||||
the delegate is the `LockMixin` subclass of `DelegatingIntroductionInterceptor`.
|
||||
Given a delegate (by default, itself), a `DelegatingIntroductionInterceptor` instance
|
||||
looks for all interfaces implemented by the delegate (other than
|
||||
`IntroductionInterceptor`) and supports introductions against any of them.
|
||||
Subclasses such as `LockMixin` can call the `suppressInterface(Class intf)`
|
||||
method to suppress interfaces that should not be exposed. However, no matter how many
|
||||
interfaces an `IntroductionInterceptor` is prepared to support, the
|
||||
`IntroductionAdvisor` used controls which interfaces are actually exposed. An
|
||||
introduced interface conceals any implementation of the same interface by the target.
|
||||
|
||||
Thus, `LockMixin` extends `DelegatingIntroductionInterceptor` and implements `Lockable`
|
||||
itself. The superclass automatically picks up that `Lockable` can be supported for
|
||||
introduction, so we do not need to specify that. We could introduce any number of
|
||||
interfaces in this way.
|
||||
|
||||
Note the use of the `locked` instance variable. This effectively adds additional state
|
||||
to that held in the target object.
|
||||
|
||||
The following example shows the example `LockMixin` class:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
public class LockMixin extends DelegatingIntroductionInterceptor implements Lockable {
|
||||
|
||||
private boolean locked;
|
||||
|
||||
public void lock() {
|
||||
this.locked = true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public void unlock() {
|
||||
this.locked = false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public boolean locked() {
|
||||
return this.locked;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public Object invoke(MethodInvocation invocation) throws Throwable {
|
||||
if (locked() && invocation.getMethod().getName().indexOf("set") == 0) {
|
||||
throw new LockedException();
|
||||
}
|
||||
return super.invoke(invocation);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
class LockMixin : DelegatingIntroductionInterceptor(), Lockable {
|
||||
|
||||
private var locked: Boolean = false
|
||||
|
||||
fun lock() {
|
||||
this.locked = true
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fun unlock() {
|
||||
this.locked = false
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fun locked(): Boolean {
|
||||
return this.locked
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
override fun invoke(invocation: MethodInvocation): Any? {
|
||||
if (locked() && invocation.method.name.indexOf("set") == 0) {
|
||||
throw LockedException()
|
||||
}
|
||||
return super.invoke(invocation)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
Often, you need not override the `invoke()` method. The
|
||||
`DelegatingIntroductionInterceptor` implementation (which calls the `delegate` method if
|
||||
the method is introduced, otherwise proceeds towards the join point) usually
|
||||
suffices. In the present case, we need to add a check: no setter method can be invoked
|
||||
if in locked mode.
|
||||
|
||||
The required introduction only needs to hold a distinct
|
||||
`LockMixin` instance and specify the introduced interfaces (in this case, only
|
||||
`Lockable`). A more complex example might take a reference to the introduction
|
||||
interceptor (which would be defined as a prototype). In this case, there is no
|
||||
configuration relevant for a `LockMixin`, so we create it by using `new`.
|
||||
The following example shows our `LockMixinAdvisor` class:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
public class LockMixinAdvisor extends DefaultIntroductionAdvisor {
|
||||
|
||||
public LockMixinAdvisor() {
|
||||
super(new LockMixin(), Lockable.class);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
class LockMixinAdvisor : DefaultIntroductionAdvisor(LockMixin(), Lockable::class.java)
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
We can apply this advisor very simply, because it requires no configuration. (However, it
|
||||
is impossible to use an `IntroductionInterceptor` without an
|
||||
`IntroductionAdvisor`.) As usual with introductions, the advisor must be per-instance,
|
||||
as it is stateful. We need a different instance of `LockMixinAdvisor`, and hence
|
||||
`LockMixin`, for each advised object. The advisor comprises part of the advised object's
|
||||
state.
|
||||
|
||||
We can apply this advisor programmatically by using the `Advised.addAdvisor()` method or
|
||||
(the recommended way) in XML configuration, as any other advisor. All proxy creation
|
||||
choices discussed below, including "`auto proxy creators,`" correctly handle introductions
|
||||
and stateful mixins.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,148 +0,0 @@
|
||||
[[aop-api-advised]]
|
||||
= Manipulating Advised Objects
|
||||
|
||||
However you create AOP proxies, you can manipulate them BY using the
|
||||
`org.springframework.aop.framework.Advised` interface. Any AOP proxy can be cast to this
|
||||
interface, no matter which other interfaces it implements. This interface includes the
|
||||
following methods:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
Advisor[] getAdvisors();
|
||||
|
||||
void addAdvice(Advice advice) throws AopConfigException;
|
||||
|
||||
void addAdvice(int pos, Advice advice) throws AopConfigException;
|
||||
|
||||
void addAdvisor(Advisor advisor) throws AopConfigException;
|
||||
|
||||
void addAdvisor(int pos, Advisor advisor) throws AopConfigException;
|
||||
|
||||
int indexOf(Advisor advisor);
|
||||
|
||||
boolean removeAdvisor(Advisor advisor) throws AopConfigException;
|
||||
|
||||
void removeAdvisor(int index) throws AopConfigException;
|
||||
|
||||
boolean replaceAdvisor(Advisor a, Advisor b) throws AopConfigException;
|
||||
|
||||
boolean isFrozen();
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
fun getAdvisors(): Array<Advisor>
|
||||
|
||||
@Throws(AopConfigException::class)
|
||||
fun addAdvice(advice: Advice)
|
||||
|
||||
@Throws(AopConfigException::class)
|
||||
fun addAdvice(pos: Int, advice: Advice)
|
||||
|
||||
@Throws(AopConfigException::class)
|
||||
fun addAdvisor(advisor: Advisor)
|
||||
|
||||
@Throws(AopConfigException::class)
|
||||
fun addAdvisor(pos: Int, advisor: Advisor)
|
||||
|
||||
fun indexOf(advisor: Advisor): Int
|
||||
|
||||
@Throws(AopConfigException::class)
|
||||
fun removeAdvisor(advisor: Advisor): Boolean
|
||||
|
||||
@Throws(AopConfigException::class)
|
||||
fun removeAdvisor(index: Int)
|
||||
|
||||
@Throws(AopConfigException::class)
|
||||
fun replaceAdvisor(a: Advisor, b: Advisor): Boolean
|
||||
|
||||
fun isFrozen(): Boolean
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
The `getAdvisors()` method returns an `Advisor` for every advisor, interceptor, or
|
||||
other advice type that has been added to the factory. If you added an `Advisor`, the
|
||||
returned advisor at this index is the object that you added. If you added an
|
||||
interceptor or other advice type, Spring wrapped this in an advisor with a
|
||||
pointcut that always returns `true`. Thus, if you added a `MethodInterceptor`, the advisor
|
||||
returned for this index is a `DefaultPointcutAdvisor` that returns your
|
||||
`MethodInterceptor` and a pointcut that matches all classes and methods.
|
||||
|
||||
The `addAdvisor()` methods can be used to add any `Advisor`. Usually, the advisor holding
|
||||
pointcut and advice is the generic `DefaultPointcutAdvisor`, which you can use with
|
||||
any advice or pointcut (but not for introductions).
|
||||
|
||||
By default, it is possible to add or remove advisors or interceptors even once a proxy
|
||||
has been created. The only restriction is that it is impossible to add or remove an
|
||||
introduction advisor, as existing proxies from the factory do not show the interface
|
||||
change. (You can obtain a new proxy from the factory to avoid this problem.)
|
||||
|
||||
The following example shows casting an AOP proxy to the `Advised` interface and examining and
|
||||
manipulating its advice:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
Advised advised = (Advised) myObject;
|
||||
Advisor[] advisors = advised.getAdvisors();
|
||||
int oldAdvisorCount = advisors.length;
|
||||
System.out.println(oldAdvisorCount + " advisors");
|
||||
|
||||
// Add an advice like an interceptor without a pointcut
|
||||
// Will match all proxied methods
|
||||
// Can use for interceptors, before, after returning or throws advice
|
||||
advised.addAdvice(new DebugInterceptor());
|
||||
|
||||
// Add selective advice using a pointcut
|
||||
advised.addAdvisor(new DefaultPointcutAdvisor(mySpecialPointcut, myAdvice));
|
||||
|
||||
assertEquals("Added two advisors", oldAdvisorCount + 2, advised.getAdvisors().length);
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
val advised = myObject as Advised
|
||||
val advisors = advised.advisors
|
||||
val oldAdvisorCount = advisors.size
|
||||
println("$oldAdvisorCount advisors")
|
||||
|
||||
// Add an advice like an interceptor without a pointcut
|
||||
// Will match all proxied methods
|
||||
// Can use for interceptors, before, after returning or throws advice
|
||||
advised.addAdvice(DebugInterceptor())
|
||||
|
||||
// Add selective advice using a pointcut
|
||||
advised.addAdvisor(DefaultPointcutAdvisor(mySpecialPointcut, myAdvice))
|
||||
|
||||
assertEquals("Added two advisors", oldAdvisorCount + 2, advised.advisors.size)
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
NOTE: It is questionable whether it is advisable (no pun intended) to modify advice on a
|
||||
business object in production, although there are, no doubt, legitimate usage cases.
|
||||
However, it can be very useful in development (for example, in tests). We have sometimes
|
||||
found it very useful to be able to add test code in the form of an interceptor or other
|
||||
advice, getting inside a method invocation that we want to test. (For example, the advice can
|
||||
get inside a transaction created for that method, perhaps to run SQL to check that
|
||||
a database was correctly updated, before marking the transaction for roll back.)
|
||||
|
||||
Depending on how you created the proxy, you can usually set a `frozen` flag. In that
|
||||
case, the `Advised` `isFrozen()` method returns `true`, and any attempts to modify
|
||||
advice through addition or removal results in an `AopConfigException`. The ability
|
||||
to freeze the state of an advised object is useful in some cases (for example, to
|
||||
prevent calling code removing a security interceptor).
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,20 +0,0 @@
|
||||
[[aop-api-advisor]]
|
||||
= The Advisor API in Spring
|
||||
:page-section-summary-toc: 1
|
||||
|
||||
In Spring, an Advisor is an aspect that contains only a single advice object associated
|
||||
with a pointcut expression.
|
||||
|
||||
Apart from the special case of introductions, any advisor can be used with any advice.
|
||||
`org.springframework.aop.support.DefaultPointcutAdvisor` is the most commonly used
|
||||
advisor class. It can be used with a `MethodInterceptor`, `BeforeAdvice`, or
|
||||
`ThrowsAdvice`.
|
||||
|
||||
It is possible to mix advisor and advice types in Spring in the same AOP proxy. For
|
||||
example, you could use an interception around advice, throws advice, and before advice in
|
||||
one proxy configuration. Spring automatically creates the necessary interceptor
|
||||
chain.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,131 +0,0 @@
|
||||
[[aop-autoproxy]]
|
||||
= Using the "auto-proxy" facility
|
||||
|
||||
So far, we have considered explicit creation of AOP proxies by using a `ProxyFactoryBean` or
|
||||
similar factory bean.
|
||||
|
||||
Spring also lets us use "`auto-proxy`" bean definitions, which can automatically
|
||||
proxy selected bean definitions. This is built on Spring's "`bean post processor`"
|
||||
infrastructure, which enables modification of any bean definition as the container loads.
|
||||
|
||||
In this model, you set up some special bean definitions in your XML bean definition file
|
||||
to configure the auto-proxy infrastructure. This lets you declare the targets
|
||||
eligible for auto-proxying. You need not use `ProxyFactoryBean`.
|
||||
|
||||
There are two ways to do this:
|
||||
|
||||
* By using an auto-proxy creator that refers to specific beans in the current context.
|
||||
* A special case of auto-proxy creation that deserves to be considered separately:
|
||||
auto-proxy creation driven by source-level metadata attributes.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[aop-autoproxy-choices]]
|
||||
== Auto-proxy Bean Definitions
|
||||
|
||||
This section covers the auto-proxy creators provided by the
|
||||
`org.springframework.aop.framework.autoproxy` package.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[aop-api-autoproxy]]
|
||||
=== `BeanNameAutoProxyCreator`
|
||||
|
||||
The `BeanNameAutoProxyCreator` class is a `BeanPostProcessor` that automatically creates
|
||||
AOP proxies for beans with names that match literal values or wildcards. The following
|
||||
example shows how to create a `BeanNameAutoProxyCreator` bean:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<bean class="org.springframework.aop.framework.autoproxy.BeanNameAutoProxyCreator">
|
||||
<property name="beanNames" value="jdk*,onlyJdk"/>
|
||||
<property name="interceptorNames">
|
||||
<list>
|
||||
<value>myInterceptor</value>
|
||||
</list>
|
||||
</property>
|
||||
</bean>
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
As with `ProxyFactoryBean`, there is an `interceptorNames` property rather than a list
|
||||
of interceptors, to allow correct behavior for prototype advisors. Named "`interceptors`"
|
||||
can be advisors or any advice type.
|
||||
|
||||
As with auto-proxying in general, the main point of using `BeanNameAutoProxyCreator` is
|
||||
to apply the same configuration consistently to multiple objects, with minimal volume of
|
||||
configuration. It is a popular choice for applying declarative transactions to multiple
|
||||
objects.
|
||||
|
||||
Bean definitions whose names match, such as `jdkMyBean` and `onlyJdk` in the preceding
|
||||
example, are plain old bean definitions with the target class. An AOP proxy is
|
||||
automatically created by the `BeanNameAutoProxyCreator`. The same advice is applied
|
||||
to all matching beans. Note that, if advisors are used (rather than the interceptor in
|
||||
the preceding example), the pointcuts may apply differently to different beans.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[aop-api-autoproxy-default]]
|
||||
=== `DefaultAdvisorAutoProxyCreator`
|
||||
|
||||
A more general and extremely powerful auto-proxy creator is
|
||||
`DefaultAdvisorAutoProxyCreator`. This automagically applies eligible advisors in the
|
||||
current context, without the need to include specific bean names in the auto-proxy
|
||||
advisor's bean definition. It offers the same merit of consistent configuration and
|
||||
avoidance of duplication as `BeanNameAutoProxyCreator`.
|
||||
|
||||
Using this mechanism involves:
|
||||
|
||||
* Specifying a `DefaultAdvisorAutoProxyCreator` bean definition.
|
||||
* Specifying any number of advisors in the same or related contexts. Note that these
|
||||
must be advisors, not interceptors or other advice. This is necessary,
|
||||
because there must be a pointcut to evaluate, to check the eligibility of each advice
|
||||
to candidate bean definitions.
|
||||
|
||||
The `DefaultAdvisorAutoProxyCreator` automatically evaluates the pointcut contained
|
||||
in each advisor, to see what (if any) advice it should apply to each business object
|
||||
(such as `businessObject1` and `businessObject2` in the example).
|
||||
|
||||
This means that any number of advisors can be applied automatically to each business
|
||||
object. If no pointcut in any of the advisors matches any method in a business object,
|
||||
the object is not proxied. As bean definitions are added for new business objects,
|
||||
they are automatically proxied if necessary.
|
||||
|
||||
Auto-proxying in general has the advantage of making it impossible for callers or
|
||||
dependencies to obtain an un-advised object. Calling `getBean("businessObject1")` on this
|
||||
`ApplicationContext` returns an AOP proxy, not the target business object. (The "`inner
|
||||
bean`" idiom shown earlier also offers this benefit.)
|
||||
|
||||
The following example creates a `DefaultAdvisorAutoProxyCreator` bean and the other
|
||||
elements discussed in this section:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<bean class="org.springframework.aop.framework.autoproxy.DefaultAdvisorAutoProxyCreator"/>
|
||||
|
||||
<bean class="org.springframework.transaction.interceptor.TransactionAttributeSourceAdvisor">
|
||||
<property name="transactionInterceptor" ref="transactionInterceptor"/>
|
||||
</bean>
|
||||
|
||||
<bean id="customAdvisor" class="com.mycompany.MyAdvisor"/>
|
||||
|
||||
<bean id="businessObject1" class="com.mycompany.BusinessObject1">
|
||||
<!-- Properties omitted -->
|
||||
</bean>
|
||||
|
||||
<bean id="businessObject2" class="com.mycompany.BusinessObject2"/>
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
The `DefaultAdvisorAutoProxyCreator` is very useful if you want to apply the same advice
|
||||
consistently to many business objects. Once the infrastructure definitions are in place,
|
||||
you can add new business objects without including specific proxy configuration.
|
||||
You can also easily drop in additional aspects (for example, tracing or
|
||||
performance monitoring aspects) with minimal change to configuration.
|
||||
|
||||
The `DefaultAdvisorAutoProxyCreator` offers support for filtering (by using a naming
|
||||
convention so that only certain advisors are evaluated, which allows the use of multiple,
|
||||
differently configured, AdvisorAutoProxyCreators in the same factory) and ordering.
|
||||
Advisors can implement the `org.springframework.core.Ordered` interface to ensure
|
||||
correct ordering if this is an issue. The `TransactionAttributeSourceAdvisor` used in the
|
||||
preceding example has a configurable order value. The default setting is unordered.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,71 +0,0 @@
|
||||
[[aop-concise-proxy]]
|
||||
= Concise Proxy Definitions
|
||||
|
||||
Especially when defining transactional proxies, you may end up with many similar proxy
|
||||
definitions. The use of parent and child bean definitions, along with inner bean
|
||||
definitions, can result in much cleaner and more concise proxy definitions.
|
||||
|
||||
First, we create a parent, template, bean definition for the proxy, as follows:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<bean id="txProxyTemplate" abstract="true"
|
||||
class="org.springframework.transaction.interceptor.TransactionProxyFactoryBean">
|
||||
<property name="transactionManager" ref="transactionManager"/>
|
||||
<property name="transactionAttributes">
|
||||
<props>
|
||||
<prop key="*">PROPAGATION_REQUIRED</prop>
|
||||
</props>
|
||||
</property>
|
||||
</bean>
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
This is never instantiated itself, so it can actually be incomplete. Then, each proxy
|
||||
that needs to be created is a child bean definition, which wraps the target of the
|
||||
proxy as an inner bean definition, since the target is never used on its own anyway.
|
||||
The following example shows such a child bean:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<bean id="myService" parent="txProxyTemplate">
|
||||
<property name="target">
|
||||
<bean class="org.springframework.samples.MyServiceImpl">
|
||||
</bean>
|
||||
</property>
|
||||
</bean>
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
You can override properties from the parent template. In the following example,
|
||||
we override the transaction propagation settings:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<bean id="mySpecialService" parent="txProxyTemplate">
|
||||
<property name="target">
|
||||
<bean class="org.springframework.samples.MySpecialServiceImpl">
|
||||
</bean>
|
||||
</property>
|
||||
<property name="transactionAttributes">
|
||||
<props>
|
||||
<prop key="get*">PROPAGATION_REQUIRED,readOnly</prop>
|
||||
<prop key="find*">PROPAGATION_REQUIRED,readOnly</prop>
|
||||
<prop key="load*">PROPAGATION_REQUIRED,readOnly</prop>
|
||||
<prop key="store*">PROPAGATION_REQUIRED</prop>
|
||||
</props>
|
||||
</property>
|
||||
</bean>
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Note that in the parent bean example, we explicitly marked the parent bean definition as
|
||||
being abstract by setting the `abstract` attribute to `true`, as described
|
||||
xref:core/beans/child-bean-definitions.adoc[previously], so that it may not actually ever be
|
||||
instantiated. Application contexts (but not simple bean factories), by default,
|
||||
pre-instantiate all singletons. Therefore, it is important (at least for singleton beans)
|
||||
that, if you have a (parent) bean definition that you intend to use only as a template,
|
||||
and this definition specifies a class, you must make sure to set the `abstract`
|
||||
attribute to `true`. Otherwise, the application context actually tries to
|
||||
pre-instantiate it.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,16 +0,0 @@
|
||||
[[aop-extensibility]]
|
||||
= Defining New Advice Types
|
||||
:page-section-summary-toc: 1
|
||||
|
||||
Spring AOP is designed to be extensible. While the interception implementation strategy
|
||||
is presently used internally, it is possible to support arbitrary advice types in
|
||||
addition to the interception around advice, before, throws advice, and
|
||||
after returning advice.
|
||||
|
||||
The `org.springframework.aop.framework.adapter` package is an SPI package that lets
|
||||
support for new custom advice types be added without changing the core framework.
|
||||
The only constraint on a custom `Advice` type is that it must implement the
|
||||
`org.aopalliance.aop.Advice` marker interface.
|
||||
|
||||
See the {api-spring-framework}/aop/framework/adapter/package-summary.html[`org.springframework.aop.framework.adapter`]
|
||||
javadoc for further information.
|
||||
@@ -1,329 +0,0 @@
|
||||
[[aop-pfb]]
|
||||
= Using the `ProxyFactoryBean` to Create AOP Proxies
|
||||
|
||||
If you use the Spring IoC container (an `ApplicationContext` or `BeanFactory`) for your
|
||||
business objects (and you should be!), you want to use one of Spring's AOP
|
||||
`FactoryBean` implementations. (Remember that a factory bean introduces a layer of indirection, letting
|
||||
it create objects of a different type.)
|
||||
|
||||
NOTE: The Spring AOP support also uses factory beans under the covers.
|
||||
|
||||
The basic way to create an AOP proxy in Spring is to use the
|
||||
`org.springframework.aop.framework.ProxyFactoryBean`. This gives complete control over
|
||||
the pointcuts, any advice that applies, and their ordering. However, there are simpler
|
||||
options that are preferable if you do not need such control.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[aop-pfb-1]]
|
||||
== Basics
|
||||
|
||||
The `ProxyFactoryBean`, like other Spring `FactoryBean` implementations, introduces a
|
||||
level of indirection. If you define a `ProxyFactoryBean` named `foo`, objects that
|
||||
reference `foo` do not see the `ProxyFactoryBean` instance itself but an object
|
||||
created by the implementation of the `getObject()` method in the `ProxyFactoryBean` . This
|
||||
method creates an AOP proxy that wraps a target object.
|
||||
|
||||
One of the most important benefits of using a `ProxyFactoryBean` or another IoC-aware
|
||||
class to create AOP proxies is that advice and pointcuts can also be
|
||||
managed by IoC. This is a powerful feature, enabling certain approaches that are hard to
|
||||
achieve with other AOP frameworks. For example, an advice may itself reference
|
||||
application objects (besides the target, which should be available in any AOP
|
||||
framework), benefiting from all the pluggability provided by Dependency Injection.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[aop-pfb-2]]
|
||||
== JavaBean Properties
|
||||
|
||||
In common with most `FactoryBean` implementations provided with Spring, the
|
||||
`ProxyFactoryBean` class is itself a JavaBean. Its properties are used to:
|
||||
|
||||
* Specify the target you want to proxy.
|
||||
* Specify whether to use CGLIB (described later and see also xref:core/aop-api/pfb.adoc#aop-pfb-proxy-types[JDK- and CGLIB-based proxies]).
|
||||
|
||||
Some key properties are inherited from `org.springframework.aop.framework.ProxyConfig`
|
||||
(the superclass for all AOP proxy factories in Spring). These key properties include
|
||||
the following:
|
||||
|
||||
* `proxyTargetClass`: `true` if the target class is to be proxied, rather than the
|
||||
target class's interfaces. If this property value is set to `true`, then CGLIB proxies
|
||||
are created (but see also xref:core/aop-api/pfb.adoc#aop-pfb-proxy-types[JDK- and CGLIB-based proxies]).
|
||||
* `optimize`: Controls whether or not aggressive optimizations are applied to proxies
|
||||
created through CGLIB. You should not blithely use this setting unless you fully
|
||||
understand how the relevant AOP proxy handles optimization. This is currently used
|
||||
only for CGLIB proxies. It has no effect with JDK dynamic proxies.
|
||||
* `frozen`: If a proxy configuration is `frozen`, changes to the configuration are
|
||||
no longer allowed. This is useful both as a slight optimization and for those cases
|
||||
when you do not want callers to be able to manipulate the proxy (through the `Advised`
|
||||
interface) after the proxy has been created. The default value of this property is
|
||||
`false`, so changes (such as adding additional advice) are allowed.
|
||||
* `exposeProxy`: Determines whether or not the current proxy should be exposed in a
|
||||
`ThreadLocal` so that it can be accessed by the target. If a target needs to obtain
|
||||
the proxy and the `exposeProxy` property is set to `true`, the target can use the
|
||||
`AopContext.currentProxy()` method.
|
||||
|
||||
Other properties specific to `ProxyFactoryBean` include the following:
|
||||
|
||||
* `proxyInterfaces`: An array of `String` interface names. If this is not supplied, a CGLIB
|
||||
proxy for the target class is used (but see also xref:core/aop-api/pfb.adoc#aop-pfb-proxy-types[JDK- and CGLIB-based proxies]).
|
||||
* `interceptorNames`: A `String` array of `Advisor`, interceptor, or other advice names to
|
||||
apply. Ordering is significant, on a first come-first served basis. That is to say
|
||||
that the first interceptor in the list is the first to be able to intercept the
|
||||
invocation.
|
||||
+
|
||||
The names are bean names in the current factory, including bean names from ancestor
|
||||
factories. You cannot mention bean references here, since doing so results in the
|
||||
`ProxyFactoryBean` ignoring the singleton setting of the advice.
|
||||
+
|
||||
You can append an interceptor name with an asterisk (`*`). Doing so results in the
|
||||
application of all advisor beans with names that start with the part before the asterisk
|
||||
to be applied. You can find an example of using this feature in xref:core/aop-api/pfb.adoc#aop-global-advisors[Using "`Global`" Advisors].
|
||||
|
||||
* singleton: Whether or not the factory should return a single object, no matter how
|
||||
often the `getObject()` method is called. Several `FactoryBean` implementations offer
|
||||
such a method. The default value is `true`. If you want to use stateful advice - for
|
||||
example, for stateful mixins - use prototype advice along with a singleton value of
|
||||
`false`.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[aop-pfb-proxy-types]]
|
||||
== JDK- and CGLIB-based proxies
|
||||
|
||||
This section serves as the definitive documentation on how the `ProxyFactoryBean`
|
||||
chooses to create either a JDK-based proxy or a CGLIB-based proxy for a particular target
|
||||
object (which is to be proxied).
|
||||
|
||||
NOTE: The behavior of the `ProxyFactoryBean` with regard to creating JDK- or CGLIB-based
|
||||
proxies changed between versions 1.2.x and 2.0 of Spring. The `ProxyFactoryBean` now
|
||||
exhibits similar semantics with regard to auto-detecting interfaces as those of the
|
||||
`TransactionProxyFactoryBean` class.
|
||||
|
||||
If the class of a target object that is to be proxied (hereafter simply referred to as
|
||||
the target class) does not implement any interfaces, a CGLIB-based proxy is
|
||||
created. This is the easiest scenario, because JDK proxies are interface-based, and no
|
||||
interfaces means JDK proxying is not even possible. You can plug in the target bean
|
||||
and specify the list of interceptors by setting the `interceptorNames` property. Note that a
|
||||
CGLIB-based proxy is created even if the `proxyTargetClass` property of the
|
||||
`ProxyFactoryBean` has been set to `false`. (Doing so makes no sense and is best
|
||||
removed from the bean definition, because it is, at best, redundant, and, at worst
|
||||
confusing.)
|
||||
|
||||
If the target class implements one (or more) interfaces, the type of proxy that is
|
||||
created depends on the configuration of the `ProxyFactoryBean`.
|
||||
|
||||
If the `proxyTargetClass` property of the `ProxyFactoryBean` has been set to `true`,
|
||||
a CGLIB-based proxy is created. This makes sense and is in keeping with the
|
||||
principle of least surprise. Even if the `proxyInterfaces` property of the
|
||||
`ProxyFactoryBean` has been set to one or more fully qualified interface names, the fact
|
||||
that the `proxyTargetClass` property is set to `true` causes CGLIB-based
|
||||
proxying to be in effect.
|
||||
|
||||
If the `proxyInterfaces` property of the `ProxyFactoryBean` has been set to one or more
|
||||
fully qualified interface names, a JDK-based proxy is created. The created
|
||||
proxy implements all of the interfaces that were specified in the `proxyInterfaces`
|
||||
property. If the target class happens to implement a whole lot more interfaces than
|
||||
those specified in the `proxyInterfaces` property, that is all well and good, but those
|
||||
additional interfaces are not implemented by the returned proxy.
|
||||
|
||||
If the `proxyInterfaces` property of the `ProxyFactoryBean` has not been set, but
|
||||
the target class does implement one (or more) interfaces, the
|
||||
`ProxyFactoryBean` auto-detects the fact that the target class does actually
|
||||
implement at least one interface, and a JDK-based proxy is created. The interfaces
|
||||
that are actually proxied are all of the interfaces that the target class
|
||||
implements. In effect, this is the same as supplying a list of each and every
|
||||
interface that the target class implements to the `proxyInterfaces` property. However,
|
||||
it is significantly less work and less prone to typographical errors.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[aop-api-proxying-intf]]
|
||||
== Proxying Interfaces
|
||||
|
||||
Consider a simple example of `ProxyFactoryBean` in action. This example involves:
|
||||
|
||||
* A target bean that is proxied. This is the `personTarget` bean definition in
|
||||
the example.
|
||||
* An `Advisor` and an `Interceptor` used to provide advice.
|
||||
* An AOP proxy bean definition to specify the target object (the `personTarget` bean),
|
||||
the interfaces to proxy, and the advice to apply.
|
||||
|
||||
The following listing shows the example:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<bean id="personTarget" class="com.mycompany.PersonImpl">
|
||||
<property name="name" value="Tony"/>
|
||||
<property name="age" value="51"/>
|
||||
</bean>
|
||||
|
||||
<bean id="myAdvisor" class="com.mycompany.MyAdvisor">
|
||||
<property name="someProperty" value="Custom string property value"/>
|
||||
</bean>
|
||||
|
||||
<bean id="debugInterceptor" class="org.springframework.aop.interceptor.DebugInterceptor">
|
||||
</bean>
|
||||
|
||||
<bean id="person"
|
||||
class="org.springframework.aop.framework.ProxyFactoryBean">
|
||||
<property name="proxyInterfaces" value="com.mycompany.Person"/>
|
||||
|
||||
<property name="target" ref="personTarget"/>
|
||||
<property name="interceptorNames">
|
||||
<list>
|
||||
<value>myAdvisor</value>
|
||||
<value>debugInterceptor</value>
|
||||
</list>
|
||||
</property>
|
||||
</bean>
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Note that the `interceptorNames` property takes a list of `String`, which holds the bean names of the
|
||||
interceptors or advisors in the current factory. You can use advisors, interceptors, before, after
|
||||
returning, and throws advice objects. The ordering of advisors is significant.
|
||||
|
||||
NOTE: You might be wondering why the list does not hold bean references. The reason for this is
|
||||
that, if the singleton property of the `ProxyFactoryBean` is set to `false`, it must be able to
|
||||
return independent proxy instances. If any of the advisors is itself a prototype, an
|
||||
independent instance would need to be returned, so it is necessary to be able to obtain
|
||||
an instance of the prototype from the factory. Holding a reference is not sufficient.
|
||||
|
||||
The `person` bean definition shown earlier can be used in place of a `Person` implementation, as
|
||||
follows:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
Person person = (Person) factory.getBean("person");
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
val person = factory.getBean("person") as Person;
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
Other beans in the same IoC context can express a strongly typed dependency on it, as
|
||||
with an ordinary Java object. The following example shows how to do so:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<bean id="personUser" class="com.mycompany.PersonUser">
|
||||
<property name="person"><ref bean="person"/></property>
|
||||
</bean>
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
The `PersonUser` class in this example exposes a property of type `Person`. As far as
|
||||
it is concerned, the AOP proxy can be used transparently in place of a "`real`" person
|
||||
implementation. However, its class would be a dynamic proxy class. It would be possible
|
||||
to cast it to the `Advised` interface (discussed later).
|
||||
|
||||
You can conceal the distinction between target and proxy by using an anonymous
|
||||
inner bean. Only the `ProxyFactoryBean` definition is different. The
|
||||
advice is included only for completeness. The following example shows how to use an
|
||||
anonymous inner bean:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<bean id="myAdvisor" class="com.mycompany.MyAdvisor">
|
||||
<property name="someProperty" value="Custom string property value"/>
|
||||
</bean>
|
||||
|
||||
<bean id="debugInterceptor" class="org.springframework.aop.interceptor.DebugInterceptor"/>
|
||||
|
||||
<bean id="person" class="org.springframework.aop.framework.ProxyFactoryBean">
|
||||
<property name="proxyInterfaces" value="com.mycompany.Person"/>
|
||||
<!-- Use inner bean, not local reference to target -->
|
||||
<property name="target">
|
||||
<bean class="com.mycompany.PersonImpl">
|
||||
<property name="name" value="Tony"/>
|
||||
<property name="age" value="51"/>
|
||||
</bean>
|
||||
</property>
|
||||
<property name="interceptorNames">
|
||||
<list>
|
||||
<value>myAdvisor</value>
|
||||
<value>debugInterceptor</value>
|
||||
</list>
|
||||
</property>
|
||||
</bean>
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Using an anonymous inner bean has the advantage that there is only one object of type `Person`. This is useful if we want
|
||||
to prevent users of the application context from obtaining a reference to the un-advised
|
||||
object or need to avoid any ambiguity with Spring IoC autowiring. There is also,
|
||||
arguably, an advantage in that the `ProxyFactoryBean` definition is self-contained.
|
||||
However, there are times when being able to obtain the un-advised target from the
|
||||
factory might actually be an advantage (for example, in certain test scenarios).
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[aop-api-proxying-class]]
|
||||
== Proxying Classes
|
||||
|
||||
What if you need to proxy a class, rather than one or more interfaces?
|
||||
|
||||
Imagine that in our earlier example, there was no `Person` interface. We needed to advise
|
||||
a class called `Person` that did not implement any business interface. In this case, you
|
||||
can configure Spring to use CGLIB proxying rather than dynamic proxies. To do so, set the
|
||||
`proxyTargetClass` property on the `ProxyFactoryBean` shown earlier to `true`. While it is best to
|
||||
program to interfaces rather than classes, the ability to advise classes that do not
|
||||
implement interfaces can be useful when working with legacy code. (In general, Spring
|
||||
is not prescriptive. While it makes it easy to apply good practices, it avoids forcing a
|
||||
particular approach.)
|
||||
|
||||
If you want to, you can force the use of CGLIB in any case, even if you do have
|
||||
interfaces.
|
||||
|
||||
CGLIB proxying works by generating a subclass of the target class at runtime. Spring
|
||||
configures this generated subclass to delegate method calls to the original target. The
|
||||
subclass is used to implement the Decorator pattern, weaving in the advice.
|
||||
|
||||
CGLIB proxying should generally be transparent to users. However, there are some issues
|
||||
to consider:
|
||||
|
||||
* `final` classes cannot be proxied, because they cannot be extended.
|
||||
* `final` methods cannot be advised, because they cannot be overridden.
|
||||
* `private` methods cannot be advised, because they cannot be overridden.
|
||||
|
||||
NOTE: There is no need to add CGLIB to your classpath. CGLIB is repackaged and included
|
||||
in the `spring-core` JAR. In other words, CGLIB-based AOP works "out of the box", as do
|
||||
JDK dynamic proxies.
|
||||
|
||||
There is little performance difference between CGLIB proxies and dynamic proxies.
|
||||
Performance should not be a decisive consideration in this case.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[aop-global-advisors]]
|
||||
== Using "`Global`" Advisors
|
||||
|
||||
By appending an asterisk to an interceptor name, all advisors with bean names that match
|
||||
the part before the asterisk are added to the advisor chain. This can come in handy
|
||||
if you need to add a standard set of "`global`" advisors. The following example defines
|
||||
two global advisors:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<bean id="proxy" class="org.springframework.aop.framework.ProxyFactoryBean">
|
||||
<property name="target" ref="service"/>
|
||||
<property name="interceptorNames">
|
||||
<list>
|
||||
<value>global*</value>
|
||||
</list>
|
||||
</property>
|
||||
</bean>
|
||||
|
||||
<bean id="global_debug" class="org.springframework.aop.interceptor.DebugInterceptor"/>
|
||||
<bean id="global_performance" class="org.springframework.aop.interceptor.PerformanceMonitorInterceptor"/>
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,256 +0,0 @@
|
||||
[[aop-api-pointcuts]]
|
||||
= Pointcut API in Spring
|
||||
|
||||
This section describes how Spring handles the crucial pointcut concept.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[aop-api-concepts]]
|
||||
== Concepts
|
||||
|
||||
Spring's pointcut model enables pointcut reuse independent of advice types. You can
|
||||
target different advice with the same pointcut.
|
||||
|
||||
The `org.springframework.aop.Pointcut` interface is the central interface, used to
|
||||
target advice to particular classes and methods. The complete interface follows:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
public interface Pointcut {
|
||||
|
||||
ClassFilter getClassFilter();
|
||||
|
||||
MethodMatcher getMethodMatcher();
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Splitting the `Pointcut` interface into two parts allows reuse of class and method
|
||||
matching parts and fine-grained composition operations (such as performing a "`union`"
|
||||
with another method matcher).
|
||||
|
||||
The `ClassFilter` interface is used to restrict the pointcut to a given set of target
|
||||
classes. If the `matches()` method always returns true, all target classes are
|
||||
matched. The following listing shows the `ClassFilter` interface definition:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
public interface ClassFilter {
|
||||
|
||||
boolean matches(Class clazz);
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
The `MethodMatcher` interface is normally more important. The complete interface follows:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
public interface MethodMatcher {
|
||||
|
||||
boolean matches(Method m, Class<?> targetClass);
|
||||
|
||||
boolean isRuntime();
|
||||
|
||||
boolean matches(Method m, Class<?> targetClass, Object... args);
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
The `matches(Method, Class)` method is used to test whether this pointcut ever
|
||||
matches a given method on a target class. This evaluation can be performed when an AOP
|
||||
proxy is created to avoid the need for a test on every method invocation. If the
|
||||
two-argument `matches` method returns `true` for a given method, and the `isRuntime()`
|
||||
method for the MethodMatcher returns `true`, the three-argument matches method is
|
||||
invoked on every method invocation. This lets a pointcut look at the arguments passed
|
||||
to the method invocation immediately before the target advice starts.
|
||||
|
||||
Most `MethodMatcher` implementations are static, meaning that their `isRuntime()` method
|
||||
returns `false`. In this case, the three-argument `matches` method is never invoked.
|
||||
|
||||
TIP: If possible, try to make pointcuts static, allowing the AOP framework to cache the
|
||||
results of pointcut evaluation when an AOP proxy is created.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[aop-api-pointcut-ops]]
|
||||
== Operations on Pointcuts
|
||||
|
||||
Spring supports operations (notably, union and intersection) on pointcuts.
|
||||
|
||||
Union means the methods that either pointcut matches.
|
||||
Intersection means the methods that both pointcuts match.
|
||||
Union is usually more useful.
|
||||
You can compose pointcuts by using the static methods in the
|
||||
`org.springframework.aop.support.Pointcuts` class or by using the
|
||||
`ComposablePointcut` class in the same package. However, using AspectJ pointcut
|
||||
expressions is usually a simpler approach.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[aop-api-pointcuts-aspectj]]
|
||||
== AspectJ Expression Pointcuts
|
||||
|
||||
Since 2.0, the most important type of pointcut used by Spring is
|
||||
`org.springframework.aop.aspectj.AspectJExpressionPointcut`. This is a pointcut that
|
||||
uses an AspectJ-supplied library to parse an AspectJ pointcut expression string.
|
||||
|
||||
See the xref:core/aop.adoc[previous chapter] for a discussion of supported AspectJ pointcut primitives.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[aop-api-pointcuts-impls]]
|
||||
== Convenience Pointcut Implementations
|
||||
|
||||
Spring provides several convenient pointcut implementations. You can use some of them
|
||||
directly; others are intended to be subclassed in application-specific pointcuts.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[aop-api-pointcuts-static]]
|
||||
=== Static Pointcuts
|
||||
|
||||
Static pointcuts are based on the method and the target class and cannot take into account
|
||||
the method's arguments. Static pointcuts suffice -- and are best -- for most usages.
|
||||
Spring can evaluate a static pointcut only once, when a method is first invoked.
|
||||
After that, there is no need to evaluate the pointcut again with each method invocation.
|
||||
|
||||
The rest of this section describes some of the static pointcut implementations that are
|
||||
included with Spring.
|
||||
|
||||
[[aop-api-pointcuts-regex]]
|
||||
==== Regular Expression Pointcuts
|
||||
|
||||
One obvious way to specify static pointcuts is regular expressions. Several AOP
|
||||
frameworks besides Spring make this possible.
|
||||
`org.springframework.aop.support.JdkRegexpMethodPointcut` is a generic regular
|
||||
expression pointcut that uses the regular expression support in the JDK.
|
||||
|
||||
With the `JdkRegexpMethodPointcut` class, you can provide a list of pattern strings.
|
||||
If any of these is a match, the pointcut evaluates to `true`. (As a consequence,
|
||||
the resulting pointcut is effectively the union of the specified patterns.)
|
||||
|
||||
The following example shows how to use `JdkRegexpMethodPointcut`:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<bean id="settersAndAbsquatulatePointcut"
|
||||
class="org.springframework.aop.support.JdkRegexpMethodPointcut">
|
||||
<property name="patterns">
|
||||
<list>
|
||||
<value>.*set.*</value>
|
||||
<value>.*absquatulate</value>
|
||||
</list>
|
||||
</property>
|
||||
</bean>
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Spring provides a convenience class named `RegexpMethodPointcutAdvisor`, which lets us
|
||||
also reference an `Advice` (remember that an `Advice` can be an interceptor, before advice,
|
||||
throws advice, and others). Behind the scenes, Spring uses a `JdkRegexpMethodPointcut`.
|
||||
Using `RegexpMethodPointcutAdvisor` simplifies wiring, as the one bean encapsulates both
|
||||
pointcut and advice, as the following example shows:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<bean id="settersAndAbsquatulateAdvisor"
|
||||
class="org.springframework.aop.support.RegexpMethodPointcutAdvisor">
|
||||
<property name="advice">
|
||||
<ref bean="beanNameOfAopAllianceInterceptor"/>
|
||||
</property>
|
||||
<property name="patterns">
|
||||
<list>
|
||||
<value>.*set.*</value>
|
||||
<value>.*absquatulate</value>
|
||||
</list>
|
||||
</property>
|
||||
</bean>
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
You can use `RegexpMethodPointcutAdvisor` with any `Advice` type.
|
||||
|
||||
[[aop-api-pointcuts-attribute-driven]]
|
||||
==== Attribute-driven Pointcuts
|
||||
|
||||
An important type of static pointcut is a metadata-driven pointcut. This uses the
|
||||
values of metadata attributes (typically, source-level metadata).
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[aop-api-pointcuts-dynamic]]
|
||||
=== Dynamic pointcuts
|
||||
|
||||
Dynamic pointcuts are costlier to evaluate than static pointcuts. They take into account
|
||||
method arguments as well as static information. This means that they must be
|
||||
evaluated with every method invocation and that the result cannot be cached, as arguments will
|
||||
vary.
|
||||
|
||||
The main example is the `control flow` pointcut.
|
||||
|
||||
[[aop-api-pointcuts-cflow]]
|
||||
==== Control Flow Pointcuts
|
||||
|
||||
Spring control flow pointcuts are conceptually similar to AspectJ `cflow` pointcuts,
|
||||
although less powerful. (There is currently no way to specify that a pointcut runs
|
||||
below a join point matched by another pointcut.) A control flow pointcut matches the
|
||||
current call stack. For example, it might fire if the join point was invoked by a method
|
||||
in the `com.mycompany.web` package or by the `SomeCaller` class. Control flow pointcuts
|
||||
are specified by using the `org.springframework.aop.support.ControlFlowPointcut` class.
|
||||
|
||||
NOTE: Control flow pointcuts are significantly more expensive to evaluate at runtime than even
|
||||
other dynamic pointcuts. In Java 1.4, the cost is about five times that of other dynamic
|
||||
pointcuts.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[aop-api-pointcuts-superclasses]]
|
||||
== Pointcut Superclasses
|
||||
|
||||
Spring provides useful pointcut superclasses to help you to implement your own pointcuts.
|
||||
|
||||
Because static pointcuts are most useful, you should probably subclass
|
||||
`StaticMethodMatcherPointcut`. This requires implementing only one
|
||||
abstract method (although you can override other methods to customize behavior). The
|
||||
following example shows how to subclass `StaticMethodMatcherPointcut`:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
class TestStaticPointcut extends StaticMethodMatcherPointcut {
|
||||
|
||||
public boolean matches(Method m, Class targetClass) {
|
||||
// return true if custom criteria match
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
class TestStaticPointcut : StaticMethodMatcherPointcut() {
|
||||
|
||||
override fun matches(method: Method, targetClass: Class<*>): Boolean {
|
||||
// return true if custom criteria match
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
There are also superclasses for dynamic pointcuts.
|
||||
You can use custom pointcuts with any advice type.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[aop-api-pointcuts-custom]]
|
||||
== Custom Pointcuts
|
||||
|
||||
Because pointcuts in Spring AOP are Java classes rather than language features (as in
|
||||
AspectJ), you can declare custom pointcuts, whether static or dynamic. Custom
|
||||
pointcuts in Spring can be arbitrarily complex. However, we recommend using the AspectJ pointcut
|
||||
expression language, if you can.
|
||||
|
||||
NOTE: Later versions of Spring may offer support for "`semantic pointcuts`" as offered by JAC --
|
||||
for example, "`all methods that change instance variables in the target object.`"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,54 +0,0 @@
|
||||
[[aop-prog]]
|
||||
= Creating AOP Proxies Programmatically with the `ProxyFactory`
|
||||
|
||||
It is easy to create AOP proxies programmatically with Spring. This lets you use
|
||||
Spring AOP without dependency on Spring IoC.
|
||||
|
||||
The interfaces implemented by the target object are
|
||||
automatically proxied. The following listing shows creation of a proxy for a target object, with one
|
||||
interceptor and one advisor:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
ProxyFactory factory = new ProxyFactory(myBusinessInterfaceImpl);
|
||||
factory.addAdvice(myMethodInterceptor);
|
||||
factory.addAdvisor(myAdvisor);
|
||||
MyBusinessInterface tb = (MyBusinessInterface) factory.getProxy();
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
val factory = ProxyFactory(myBusinessInterfaceImpl)
|
||||
factory.addAdvice(myMethodInterceptor)
|
||||
factory.addAdvisor(myAdvisor)
|
||||
val tb = factory.proxy as MyBusinessInterface
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
The first step is to construct an object of type
|
||||
`org.springframework.aop.framework.ProxyFactory`. You can create this with a target
|
||||
object, as in the preceding example, or specify the interfaces to be proxied in an alternate
|
||||
constructor.
|
||||
|
||||
You can add advice (with interceptors as a specialized kind of advice), advisors, or both
|
||||
and manipulate them for the life of the `ProxyFactory`. If you add an
|
||||
`IntroductionInterceptionAroundAdvisor`, you can cause the proxy to implement additional
|
||||
interfaces.
|
||||
|
||||
There are also convenience methods on `ProxyFactory` (inherited from `AdvisedSupport`)
|
||||
that let you add other advice types, such as before and throws advice.
|
||||
`AdvisedSupport` is the superclass of both `ProxyFactory` and `ProxyFactoryBean`.
|
||||
|
||||
TIP: Integrating AOP proxy creation with the IoC framework is best practice in most
|
||||
applications. We recommend that you externalize configuration from Java code with AOP,
|
||||
as you should in general.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,232 +0,0 @@
|
||||
[[aop-targetsource]]
|
||||
= Using `TargetSource` Implementations
|
||||
|
||||
Spring offers the concept of a `TargetSource`, expressed in the
|
||||
`org.springframework.aop.TargetSource` interface. This interface is responsible for
|
||||
returning the "`target object`" that implements the join point. The `TargetSource`
|
||||
implementation is asked for a target instance each time the AOP proxy handles a method
|
||||
invocation.
|
||||
|
||||
Developers who use Spring AOP do not normally need to work directly with `TargetSource` implementations, but
|
||||
this provides a powerful means of supporting pooling, hot swappable, and other
|
||||
sophisticated targets. For example, a pooling `TargetSource` can return a different target
|
||||
instance for each invocation, by using a pool to manage instances.
|
||||
|
||||
If you do not specify a `TargetSource`, a default implementation is used to wrap a
|
||||
local object. The same target is returned for each invocation (as you would expect).
|
||||
|
||||
The rest of this section describes the standard target sources provided with Spring and how you can use them.
|
||||
|
||||
TIP: When using a custom target source, your target will usually need to be a prototype
|
||||
rather than a singleton bean definition. This allows Spring to create a new target
|
||||
instance when required.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[aop-ts-swap]]
|
||||
== Hot-swappable Target Sources
|
||||
|
||||
The `org.springframework.aop.target.HotSwappableTargetSource` exists to let the target
|
||||
of an AOP proxy be switched while letting callers keep their references to it.
|
||||
|
||||
Changing the target source's target takes effect immediately. The
|
||||
`HotSwappableTargetSource` is thread-safe.
|
||||
|
||||
You can change the target by using the `swap()` method on HotSwappableTargetSource, as the follow example shows:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
HotSwappableTargetSource swapper = (HotSwappableTargetSource) beanFactory.getBean("swapper");
|
||||
Object oldTarget = swapper.swap(newTarget);
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
val swapper = beanFactory.getBean("swapper") as HotSwappableTargetSource
|
||||
val oldTarget = swapper.swap(newTarget)
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
The following example shows the required XML definitions:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<bean id="initialTarget" class="mycompany.OldTarget"/>
|
||||
|
||||
<bean id="swapper" class="org.springframework.aop.target.HotSwappableTargetSource">
|
||||
<constructor-arg ref="initialTarget"/>
|
||||
</bean>
|
||||
|
||||
<bean id="swappable" class="org.springframework.aop.framework.ProxyFactoryBean">
|
||||
<property name="targetSource" ref="swapper"/>
|
||||
</bean>
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
The preceding `swap()` call changes the target of the swappable bean. Clients that hold a
|
||||
reference to that bean are unaware of the change but immediately start hitting
|
||||
the new target.
|
||||
|
||||
Although this example does not add any advice (it is not necessary to add advice to
|
||||
use a `TargetSource`), any `TargetSource` can be used in conjunction with
|
||||
arbitrary advice.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[aop-ts-pool]]
|
||||
== Pooling Target Sources
|
||||
|
||||
Using a pooling target source provides a similar programming model to stateless session
|
||||
EJBs, in which a pool of identical instances is maintained, with method invocations
|
||||
going to free objects in the pool.
|
||||
|
||||
A crucial difference between Spring pooling and SLSB pooling is that Spring pooling can
|
||||
be applied to any POJO. As with Spring in general, this service can be applied in a
|
||||
non-invasive way.
|
||||
|
||||
Spring provides support for Commons Pool 2.2, which provides a
|
||||
fairly efficient pooling implementation. You need the `commons-pool` Jar on your
|
||||
application's classpath to use this feature. You can also subclass
|
||||
`org.springframework.aop.target.AbstractPoolingTargetSource` to support any other
|
||||
pooling API.
|
||||
|
||||
NOTE: Commons Pool 1.5+ is also supported but is deprecated as of Spring Framework 4.2.
|
||||
|
||||
The following listing shows an example configuration:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<bean id="businessObjectTarget" class="com.mycompany.MyBusinessObject"
|
||||
scope="prototype">
|
||||
... properties omitted
|
||||
</bean>
|
||||
|
||||
<bean id="poolTargetSource" class="org.springframework.aop.target.CommonsPool2TargetSource">
|
||||
<property name="targetBeanName" value="businessObjectTarget"/>
|
||||
<property name="maxSize" value="25"/>
|
||||
</bean>
|
||||
|
||||
<bean id="businessObject" class="org.springframework.aop.framework.ProxyFactoryBean">
|
||||
<property name="targetSource" ref="poolTargetSource"/>
|
||||
<property name="interceptorNames" value="myInterceptor"/>
|
||||
</bean>
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Note that the target object (`businessObjectTarget` in the preceding example) must be a
|
||||
prototype. This lets the `PoolingTargetSource` implementation create new instances
|
||||
of the target to grow the pool as necessary. See the {api-spring-framework}/aop/target/AbstractPoolingTargetSource.html[javadoc of
|
||||
`AbstractPoolingTargetSource`] and the concrete subclass you wish to use for information
|
||||
about its properties. `maxSize` is the most basic and is always guaranteed to be present.
|
||||
|
||||
In this case, `myInterceptor` is the name of an interceptor that would need to be
|
||||
defined in the same IoC context. However, you need not specify interceptors to
|
||||
use pooling. If you want only pooling and no other advice, do not set the
|
||||
`interceptorNames` property at all.
|
||||
|
||||
You can configure Spring to be able to cast any pooled object to the
|
||||
`org.springframework.aop.target.PoolingConfig` interface, which exposes information
|
||||
about the configuration and current size of the pool through an introduction. You
|
||||
need to define an advisor similar to the following:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<bean id="poolConfigAdvisor" class="org.springframework.beans.factory.config.MethodInvokingFactoryBean">
|
||||
<property name="targetObject" ref="poolTargetSource"/>
|
||||
<property name="targetMethod" value="getPoolingConfigMixin"/>
|
||||
</bean>
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
This advisor is obtained by calling a convenience method on the
|
||||
`AbstractPoolingTargetSource` class, hence the use of `MethodInvokingFactoryBean`. This
|
||||
advisor's name (`poolConfigAdvisor`, here) must be in the list of interceptors names in
|
||||
the `ProxyFactoryBean` that exposes the pooled object.
|
||||
|
||||
The cast is defined as follows:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
PoolingConfig conf = (PoolingConfig) beanFactory.getBean("businessObject");
|
||||
System.out.println("Max pool size is " + conf.getMaxSize());
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
val conf = beanFactory.getBean("businessObject") as PoolingConfig
|
||||
println("Max pool size is " + conf.maxSize)
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
NOTE: Pooling stateless service objects is not usually necessary. We do not believe it should
|
||||
be the default choice, as most stateless objects are naturally thread-safe, and instance
|
||||
pooling is problematic if resources are cached.
|
||||
|
||||
Simpler pooling is available by using auto-proxying. You can set the `TargetSource` implementations
|
||||
used by any auto-proxy creator.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[aop-ts-prototype]]
|
||||
== Prototype Target Sources
|
||||
|
||||
Setting up a "`prototype`" target source is similar to setting up a pooling `TargetSource`. In this
|
||||
case, a new instance of the target is created on every method invocation. Although
|
||||
the cost of creating a new object is not high in a modern JVM, the cost of wiring up the
|
||||
new object (satisfying its IoC dependencies) may be more expensive. Thus, you should not
|
||||
use this approach without very good reason.
|
||||
|
||||
To do this, you could modify the `poolTargetSource` definition shown earlier as follows
|
||||
(we also changed the name, for clarity):
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<bean id="prototypeTargetSource" class="org.springframework.aop.target.PrototypeTargetSource">
|
||||
<property name="targetBeanName" ref="businessObjectTarget"/>
|
||||
</bean>
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
The only property is the name of the target bean. Inheritance is used in the
|
||||
`TargetSource` implementations to ensure consistent naming. As with the pooling target
|
||||
source, the target bean must be a prototype bean definition.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[aop-ts-threadlocal]]
|
||||
== `ThreadLocal` Target Sources
|
||||
|
||||
`ThreadLocal` target sources are useful if you need an object to be created for each
|
||||
incoming request (per thread that is). The concept of a `ThreadLocal` provides a JDK-wide
|
||||
facility to transparently store a resource alongside a thread. Setting up a
|
||||
`ThreadLocalTargetSource` is pretty much the same as was explained for the other types
|
||||
of target source, as the following example shows:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<bean id="threadlocalTargetSource" class="org.springframework.aop.target.ThreadLocalTargetSource">
|
||||
<property name="targetBeanName" value="businessObjectTarget"/>
|
||||
</bean>
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
NOTE: `ThreadLocal` instances come with serious issues (potentially resulting in memory leaks) when
|
||||
incorrectly using them in multi-threaded and multi-classloader environments. You
|
||||
should always consider wrapping a `ThreadLocal` in some other class and never directly use
|
||||
the `ThreadLocal` itself (except in the wrapper class). Also, you should
|
||||
always remember to correctly set and unset (where the latter simply involves a call to
|
||||
`ThreadLocal.set(null)`) the resource local to the thread. Unsetting should be done in
|
||||
any case, since not unsetting it might result in problematic behavior. Spring's
|
||||
`ThreadLocal` support does this for you and should always be considered in favor of using
|
||||
`ThreadLocal` instances without other proper handling code.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,38 +0,0 @@
|
||||
[[aop]]
|
||||
= Aspect Oriented Programming with Spring
|
||||
|
||||
Aspect-oriented Programming (AOP) complements Object-oriented Programming (OOP) by
|
||||
providing another way of thinking about program structure. The key unit of modularity
|
||||
in OOP is the class, whereas in AOP the unit of modularity is the aspect. Aspects
|
||||
enable the modularization of concerns (such as transaction management) that cut across
|
||||
multiple types and objects. (Such concerns are often termed "crosscutting" concerns
|
||||
in AOP literature.)
|
||||
|
||||
One of the key components of Spring is the AOP framework. While the Spring IoC
|
||||
container does not depend on AOP (meaning you do not need to use AOP if you don't want
|
||||
to), AOP complements Spring IoC to provide a very capable middleware solution.
|
||||
|
||||
.Spring AOP with AspectJ pointcuts
|
||||
****
|
||||
Spring provides simple and powerful ways of writing custom aspects by using either a
|
||||
xref:core/aop/schema.adoc[schema-based approach] or the xref:core/aop/ataspectj.adoc[@AspectJ annotation style].
|
||||
Both of these styles offer fully typed advice and use of the AspectJ pointcut language
|
||||
while still using Spring AOP for weaving.
|
||||
|
||||
This chapter discusses the schema- and @AspectJ-based AOP support.
|
||||
The lower-level AOP support is discussed in xref:core/aop-api.adoc[the following chapter].
|
||||
****
|
||||
|
||||
AOP is used in the Spring Framework to:
|
||||
|
||||
* Provide declarative enterprise services. The most important such service is
|
||||
xref:data-access/transaction/declarative.adoc[declarative transaction management].
|
||||
* Let users implement custom aspects, complementing their use of OOP with AOP.
|
||||
|
||||
NOTE: If you are interested only in generic declarative services or other pre-packaged
|
||||
declarative middleware services such as pooling, you do not need to work directly with
|
||||
Spring AOP, and can skip most of this chapter.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,59 +0,0 @@
|
||||
[[aop-aspectj-programmatic]]
|
||||
= Programmatic Creation of @AspectJ Proxies
|
||||
|
||||
In addition to declaring aspects in your configuration by using either `<aop:config>`
|
||||
or `<aop:aspectj-autoproxy>`, it is also possible to programmatically create proxies
|
||||
that advise target objects. For the full details of Spring's AOP API, see the
|
||||
xref:core/aop-api.adoc[next chapter]. Here, we want to focus on the ability to automatically
|
||||
create proxies by using @AspectJ aspects.
|
||||
|
||||
You can use the `org.springframework.aop.aspectj.annotation.AspectJProxyFactory` class
|
||||
to create a proxy for a target object that is advised by one or more @AspectJ aspects.
|
||||
The basic usage for this class is very simple, as the following example shows:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
// create a factory that can generate a proxy for the given target object
|
||||
AspectJProxyFactory factory = new AspectJProxyFactory(targetObject);
|
||||
|
||||
// add an aspect, the class must be an @AspectJ aspect
|
||||
// you can call this as many times as you need with different aspects
|
||||
factory.addAspect(SecurityManager.class);
|
||||
|
||||
// you can also add existing aspect instances, the type of the object supplied
|
||||
// must be an @AspectJ aspect
|
||||
factory.addAspect(usageTracker);
|
||||
|
||||
// now get the proxy object...
|
||||
MyInterfaceType proxy = factory.getProxy();
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
// create a factory that can generate a proxy for the given target object
|
||||
val factory = AspectJProxyFactory(targetObject)
|
||||
|
||||
// add an aspect, the class must be an @AspectJ aspect
|
||||
// you can call this as many times as you need with different aspects
|
||||
factory.addAspect(SecurityManager::class.java)
|
||||
|
||||
// you can also add existing aspect instances, the type of the object supplied
|
||||
// must be an @AspectJ aspect
|
||||
factory.addAspect(usageTracker)
|
||||
|
||||
// now get the proxy object...
|
||||
val proxy = factory.getProxy<Any>()
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
See the {api-spring-framework}/aop/aspectj/annotation/AspectJProxyFactory.html[javadoc] for more information.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,16 +0,0 @@
|
||||
[[aop-ataspectj]]
|
||||
= @AspectJ support
|
||||
:page-section-summary-toc: 1
|
||||
|
||||
@AspectJ refers to a style of declaring aspects as regular Java classes annotated with
|
||||
annotations. The @AspectJ style was introduced by the
|
||||
https://www.eclipse.org/aspectj[AspectJ project] as part of the AspectJ 5 release. Spring
|
||||
interprets the same annotations as AspectJ 5, using a library supplied by AspectJ
|
||||
for pointcut parsing and matching. The AOP runtime is still pure Spring AOP, though, and
|
||||
there is no dependency on the AspectJ compiler or weaver.
|
||||
|
||||
NOTE: Using the AspectJ compiler and weaver enables use of the full AspectJ language and
|
||||
is discussed in xref:core/aop/using-aspectj.adoc[Using AspectJ with Spring Applications].
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,946 +0,0 @@
|
||||
[[aop-advice]]
|
||||
= Declaring Advice
|
||||
|
||||
Advice is associated with a pointcut expression and runs before, after, or around method
|
||||
executions matched by the pointcut. The pointcut expression may be either an _inline
|
||||
pointcut_ or a reference to a xref:core/aop/ataspectj/pointcuts.adoc#aop-common-pointcuts[_named pointcut_].
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[aop-advice-before]]
|
||||
== Before Advice
|
||||
|
||||
You can declare before advice in an aspect by using the `@Before` annotation.
|
||||
|
||||
The following example uses an inline pointcut expression.
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
import org.aspectj.lang.annotation.Aspect;
|
||||
import org.aspectj.lang.annotation.Before;
|
||||
|
||||
@Aspect
|
||||
public class BeforeExample {
|
||||
|
||||
@Before("execution(* com.xyz.dao.*.*(..))")
|
||||
public void doAccessCheck() {
|
||||
// ...
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
import org.aspectj.lang.annotation.Aspect
|
||||
import org.aspectj.lang.annotation.Before
|
||||
|
||||
@Aspect
|
||||
class BeforeExample {
|
||||
|
||||
@Before("execution(* com.xyz.dao.*.*(..))")
|
||||
fun doAccessCheck() {
|
||||
// ...
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
If we use a xref:core/aop/ataspectj/pointcuts.adoc#aop-common-pointcuts[named pointcut], we can rewrite the preceding example
|
||||
as follows:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
import org.aspectj.lang.annotation.Aspect;
|
||||
import org.aspectj.lang.annotation.Before;
|
||||
|
||||
@Aspect
|
||||
public class BeforeExample {
|
||||
|
||||
@Before("com.xyz.CommonPointcuts.dataAccessOperation()")
|
||||
public void doAccessCheck() {
|
||||
// ...
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
import org.aspectj.lang.annotation.Aspect
|
||||
import org.aspectj.lang.annotation.Before
|
||||
|
||||
@Aspect
|
||||
class BeforeExample {
|
||||
|
||||
@Before("com.xyz.CommonPointcuts.dataAccessOperation()")
|
||||
fun doAccessCheck() {
|
||||
// ...
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[aop-advice-after-returning]]
|
||||
== After Returning Advice
|
||||
|
||||
After returning advice runs when a matched method execution returns normally.
|
||||
You can declare it by using the `@AfterReturning` annotation.
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
import org.aspectj.lang.annotation.Aspect;
|
||||
import org.aspectj.lang.annotation.AfterReturning;
|
||||
|
||||
@Aspect
|
||||
public class AfterReturningExample {
|
||||
|
||||
@AfterReturning("execution(* com.xyz.dao.*.*(..))")
|
||||
public void doAccessCheck() {
|
||||
// ...
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
import org.aspectj.lang.annotation.Aspect
|
||||
import org.aspectj.lang.annotation.AfterReturning
|
||||
|
||||
@Aspect
|
||||
class AfterReturningExample {
|
||||
|
||||
@AfterReturning("execution(* com.xyz.dao.*.*(..))")
|
||||
fun doAccessCheck() {
|
||||
// ...
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
NOTE: You can have multiple advice declarations (and other members as well),
|
||||
all inside the same aspect. We show only a single advice declaration in these
|
||||
examples to focus the effect of each one.
|
||||
|
||||
Sometimes, you need access in the advice body to the actual value that was returned.
|
||||
You can use the form of `@AfterReturning` that binds the return value to get that
|
||||
access, as the following example shows:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
import org.aspectj.lang.annotation.Aspect;
|
||||
import org.aspectj.lang.annotation.AfterReturning;
|
||||
|
||||
@Aspect
|
||||
public class AfterReturningExample {
|
||||
|
||||
@AfterReturning(
|
||||
pointcut="execution(* com.xyz.dao.*.*(..))",
|
||||
returning="retVal")
|
||||
public void doAccessCheck(Object retVal) {
|
||||
// ...
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
import org.aspectj.lang.annotation.Aspect
|
||||
import org.aspectj.lang.annotation.AfterReturning
|
||||
|
||||
@Aspect
|
||||
class AfterReturningExample {
|
||||
|
||||
@AfterReturning(
|
||||
pointcut = "execution(* com.xyz.dao.*.*(..))",
|
||||
returning = "retVal")
|
||||
fun doAccessCheck(retVal: Any?) {
|
||||
// ...
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
The name used in the `returning` attribute must correspond to the name of a parameter
|
||||
in the advice method. When a method execution returns, the return value is passed to
|
||||
the advice method as the corresponding argument value. A `returning` clause also
|
||||
restricts matching to only those method executions that return a value of the
|
||||
specified type (in this case, `Object`, which matches any return value).
|
||||
|
||||
Please note that it is not possible to return a totally different reference when
|
||||
using after returning advice.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[aop-advice-after-throwing]]
|
||||
== After Throwing Advice
|
||||
|
||||
After throwing advice runs when a matched method execution exits by throwing an
|
||||
exception. You can declare it by using the `@AfterThrowing` annotation, as the
|
||||
following example shows:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
import org.aspectj.lang.annotation.Aspect;
|
||||
import org.aspectj.lang.annotation.AfterThrowing;
|
||||
|
||||
@Aspect
|
||||
public class AfterThrowingExample {
|
||||
|
||||
@AfterThrowing("execution(* com.xyz.dao.*.*(..))")
|
||||
public void doRecoveryActions() {
|
||||
// ...
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
import org.aspectj.lang.annotation.Aspect
|
||||
import org.aspectj.lang.annotation.AfterThrowing
|
||||
|
||||
@Aspect
|
||||
class AfterThrowingExample {
|
||||
|
||||
@AfterThrowing("execution(* com.xyz.dao.*.*(..))")
|
||||
fun doRecoveryActions() {
|
||||
// ...
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
Often, you want the advice to run only when exceptions of a given type are thrown,
|
||||
and you also often need access to the thrown exception in the advice body. You can
|
||||
use the `throwing` attribute to both restrict matching (if desired -- use `Throwable`
|
||||
as the exception type otherwise) and bind the thrown exception to an advice parameter.
|
||||
The following example shows how to do so:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
import org.aspectj.lang.annotation.Aspect;
|
||||
import org.aspectj.lang.annotation.AfterThrowing;
|
||||
|
||||
@Aspect
|
||||
public class AfterThrowingExample {
|
||||
|
||||
@AfterThrowing(
|
||||
pointcut="execution(* com.xyz.dao.*.*(..))",
|
||||
throwing="ex")
|
||||
public void doRecoveryActions(DataAccessException ex) {
|
||||
// ...
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
import org.aspectj.lang.annotation.Aspect
|
||||
import org.aspectj.lang.annotation.AfterThrowing
|
||||
|
||||
@Aspect
|
||||
class AfterThrowingExample {
|
||||
|
||||
@AfterThrowing(
|
||||
pointcut = "execution(* com.xyz.dao.*.*(..))",
|
||||
throwing = "ex")
|
||||
fun doRecoveryActions(ex: DataAccessException) {
|
||||
// ...
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
The name used in the `throwing` attribute must correspond to the name of a parameter in
|
||||
the advice method. When a method execution exits by throwing an exception, the exception
|
||||
is passed to the advice method as the corresponding argument value. A `throwing` clause
|
||||
also restricts matching to only those method executions that throw an exception of the
|
||||
specified type (`DataAccessException`, in this case).
|
||||
|
||||
[NOTE]
|
||||
====
|
||||
Note that `@AfterThrowing` does not indicate a general exception handling callback.
|
||||
Specifically, an `@AfterThrowing` advice method is only supposed to receive exceptions
|
||||
from the join point (user-declared target method) itself but not from an accompanying
|
||||
`@After`/`@AfterReturning` method.
|
||||
====
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[aop-advice-after-finally]]
|
||||
== After (Finally) Advice
|
||||
|
||||
After (finally) advice runs when a matched method execution exits. It is declared by
|
||||
using the `@After` annotation. After advice must be prepared to handle both normal and
|
||||
exception return conditions. It is typically used for releasing resources and similar
|
||||
purposes. The following example shows how to use after finally advice:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
import org.aspectj.lang.annotation.Aspect;
|
||||
import org.aspectj.lang.annotation.After;
|
||||
|
||||
@Aspect
|
||||
public class AfterFinallyExample {
|
||||
|
||||
@After("execution(* com.xyz.dao.*.*(..))")
|
||||
public void doReleaseLock() {
|
||||
// ...
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
import org.aspectj.lang.annotation.Aspect
|
||||
import org.aspectj.lang.annotation.After
|
||||
|
||||
@Aspect
|
||||
class AfterFinallyExample {
|
||||
|
||||
@After("execution(* com.xyz.dao.*.*(..))")
|
||||
fun doReleaseLock() {
|
||||
// ...
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
[NOTE]
|
||||
====
|
||||
Note that `@After` advice in AspectJ is defined as "after finally advice", analogous
|
||||
to a finally block in a try-catch statement. It will be invoked for any outcome,
|
||||
normal return or exception thrown from the join point (user-declared target method),
|
||||
in contrast to `@AfterReturning` which only applies to successful normal returns.
|
||||
====
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[aop-ataspectj-around-advice]]
|
||||
== Around Advice
|
||||
|
||||
The last kind of advice is _around_ advice. Around advice runs "around" a matched
|
||||
method's execution. It has the opportunity to do work both before and after the method
|
||||
runs and to determine when, how, and even if the method actually gets to run at all.
|
||||
Around advice is often used if you need to share state before and after a method
|
||||
execution in a thread-safe manner – for example, starting and stopping a timer.
|
||||
|
||||
[TIP]
|
||||
====
|
||||
Always use the least powerful form of advice that meets your requirements.
|
||||
|
||||
For example, do not use _around_ advice if _before_ advice is sufficient for your needs.
|
||||
====
|
||||
|
||||
Around advice is declared by annotating a method with the `@Around` annotation. The
|
||||
method should declare `Object` as its return type, and the first parameter of the method
|
||||
must be of type `ProceedingJoinPoint`. Within the body of the advice method, you must
|
||||
invoke `proceed()` on the `ProceedingJoinPoint` in order for the underlying method to
|
||||
run. Invoking `proceed()` without arguments will result in the caller's original
|
||||
arguments being supplied to the underlying method when it is invoked. For advanced use
|
||||
cases, there is an overloaded variant of the `proceed()` method which accepts an array of
|
||||
arguments (`Object[]`). The values in the array will be used as the arguments to the
|
||||
underlying method when it is invoked.
|
||||
|
||||
[NOTE]
|
||||
====
|
||||
The behavior of `proceed` when called with an `Object[]` is a little different than the
|
||||
behavior of `proceed` for around advice compiled by the AspectJ compiler. For around
|
||||
advice written using the traditional AspectJ language, the number of arguments passed to
|
||||
`proceed` must match the number of arguments passed to the around advice (not the number
|
||||
of arguments taken by the underlying join point), and the value passed to proceed in a
|
||||
given argument position supplants the original value at the join point for the entity the
|
||||
value was bound to (do not worry if this does not make sense right now).
|
||||
|
||||
The approach taken by Spring is simpler and a better match to its proxy-based,
|
||||
execution-only semantics. You only need to be aware of this difference if you compile
|
||||
`@AspectJ` aspects written for Spring and use `proceed` with arguments with the AspectJ
|
||||
compiler and weaver. There is a way to write such aspects that is 100% compatible across
|
||||
both Spring AOP and AspectJ, and this is discussed in the
|
||||
xref:core/aop/ataspectj/advice.adoc#aop-ataspectj-advice-proceeding-with-the-call[following section on advice parameters].
|
||||
====
|
||||
|
||||
The value returned by the around advice is the return value seen by the caller of the
|
||||
method. For example, a simple caching aspect could return a value from a cache if it has
|
||||
one or invoke `proceed()` (and return that value) if it does not. Note that `proceed`
|
||||
may be invoked once, many times, or not at all within the body of the around advice. All
|
||||
of these are legal.
|
||||
|
||||
WARNING: If you declare the return type of your around advice method as `void`, `null`
|
||||
will always be returned to the caller, effectively ignoring the result of any invocation
|
||||
of `proceed()`. It is therefore recommended that an around advice method declare a return
|
||||
type of `Object`. The advice method should typically return the value returned from an
|
||||
invocation of `proceed()`, even if the underlying method has a `void` return type.
|
||||
However, the advice may optionally return a cached value, a wrapped value, or some other
|
||||
value depending on the use case.
|
||||
|
||||
The following example shows how to use around advice:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
import org.aspectj.lang.annotation.Aspect;
|
||||
import org.aspectj.lang.annotation.Around;
|
||||
import org.aspectj.lang.ProceedingJoinPoint;
|
||||
|
||||
@Aspect
|
||||
public class AroundExample {
|
||||
|
||||
@Around("execution(* com.xyz..service.*.*(..))")
|
||||
public Object doBasicProfiling(ProceedingJoinPoint pjp) throws Throwable {
|
||||
// start stopwatch
|
||||
Object retVal = pjp.proceed();
|
||||
// stop stopwatch
|
||||
return retVal;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
import org.aspectj.lang.annotation.Aspect
|
||||
import org.aspectj.lang.annotation.Around
|
||||
import org.aspectj.lang.ProceedingJoinPoint
|
||||
|
||||
@Aspect
|
||||
class AroundExample {
|
||||
|
||||
@Around("execution(* com.xyz..service.*.*(..))")
|
||||
fun doBasicProfiling(pjp: ProceedingJoinPoint): Any? {
|
||||
// start stopwatch
|
||||
val retVal = pjp.proceed()
|
||||
// stop stopwatch
|
||||
return retVal
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
[[aop-ataspectj-advice-params]]
|
||||
== Advice Parameters
|
||||
|
||||
Spring offers fully typed advice, meaning that you declare the parameters you need in the
|
||||
advice signature (as we saw earlier for the returning and throwing examples) rather than
|
||||
work with `Object[]` arrays all the time. We see how to make argument and other contextual
|
||||
values available to the advice body later in this section. First, we take a look at how to
|
||||
write generic advice that can find out about the method the advice is currently advising.
|
||||
|
||||
[[aop-ataspectj-advice-params-the-joinpoint]]
|
||||
=== Access to the Current `JoinPoint`
|
||||
|
||||
Any advice method may declare, as its first parameter, a parameter of type
|
||||
`org.aspectj.lang.JoinPoint`. Note that around advice is required to declare a first
|
||||
parameter of type `ProceedingJoinPoint`, which is a subclass of `JoinPoint`.
|
||||
|
||||
The `JoinPoint` interface provides a number of useful methods:
|
||||
|
||||
* `getArgs()`: Returns the method arguments.
|
||||
* `getThis()`: Returns the proxy object.
|
||||
* `getTarget()`: Returns the target object.
|
||||
* `getSignature()`: Returns a description of the method that is being advised.
|
||||
* `toString()`: Prints a useful description of the method being advised.
|
||||
|
||||
See the https://www.eclipse.org/aspectj/doc/released/runtime-api/org/aspectj/lang/JoinPoint.html[javadoc] for more detail.
|
||||
|
||||
[[aop-ataspectj-advice-params-passing]]
|
||||
=== Passing Parameters to Advice
|
||||
|
||||
We have already seen how to bind the returned value or exception value (using after
|
||||
returning and after throwing advice). To make argument values available to the advice
|
||||
body, you can use the binding form of `args`. If you use a parameter name in place of a
|
||||
type name in an `args` expression, the value of the corresponding argument is passed as
|
||||
the parameter value when the advice is invoked. An example should make this clearer.
|
||||
Suppose you want to advise the execution of DAO operations that take an `Account`
|
||||
object as the first parameter, and you need access to the account in the advice body.
|
||||
You could write the following:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
@Before("execution(* com.xyz.dao.*.*(..)) && args(account,..)")
|
||||
public void validateAccount(Account account) {
|
||||
// ...
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
@Before("execution(* com.xyz.dao.*.*(..)) && args(account,..)")
|
||||
fun validateAccount(account: Account) {
|
||||
// ...
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
The `args(account,..)` part of the pointcut expression serves two purposes. First, it
|
||||
restricts matching to only those method executions where the method takes at least one
|
||||
parameter, and the argument passed to that parameter is an instance of `Account`.
|
||||
Second, it makes the actual `Account` object available to the advice through the `account`
|
||||
parameter.
|
||||
|
||||
Another way of writing this is to declare a pointcut that "provides" the `Account`
|
||||
object value when it matches a join point, and then refer to the named pointcut
|
||||
from the advice. This would look as follows:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
@Pointcut("execution(* com.xyz.dao.*.*(..)) && args(account,..)")
|
||||
private void accountDataAccessOperation(Account account) {}
|
||||
|
||||
@Before("accountDataAccessOperation(account)")
|
||||
public void validateAccount(Account account) {
|
||||
// ...
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
@Pointcut("execution(* com.xyz.dao.*.*(..)) && args(account,..)")
|
||||
private fun accountDataAccessOperation(account: Account) {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Before("accountDataAccessOperation(account)")
|
||||
fun validateAccount(account: Account) {
|
||||
// ...
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
See the AspectJ programming guide for more details.
|
||||
|
||||
The proxy object (`this`), target object (`target`), and annotations (`@within`,
|
||||
`@target`, `@annotation`, and `@args`) can all be bound in a similar fashion. The next
|
||||
set of examples shows how to match the execution of methods annotated with an
|
||||
`@Auditable` annotation and extract the audit code:
|
||||
|
||||
The following shows the definition of the `@Auditable` annotation:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
@Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
|
||||
@Target(ElementType.METHOD)
|
||||
public @interface Auditable {
|
||||
AuditCode value();
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
@Retention(AnnotationRetention.RUNTIME)
|
||||
@Target(AnnotationTarget.FUNCTION)
|
||||
annotation class Auditable(val value: AuditCode)
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
The following shows the advice that matches the execution of `@Auditable` methods:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
@Before("com.xyz.Pointcuts.publicMethod() && @annotation(auditable)") // <1>
|
||||
public void audit(Auditable auditable) {
|
||||
AuditCode code = auditable.value();
|
||||
// ...
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
<1> References the `publicMethod` named pointcut defined in xref:core/aop/ataspectj/pointcuts.adoc#aop-pointcuts-combining[Combining Pointcut Expressions].
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
@Before("com.xyz.Pointcuts.publicMethod() && @annotation(auditable)") // <1>
|
||||
fun audit(auditable: Auditable) {
|
||||
val code = auditable.value()
|
||||
// ...
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
<1> References the `publicMethod` named pointcut defined in xref:core/aop/ataspectj/pointcuts.adoc#aop-pointcuts-combining[Combining Pointcut Expressions].
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
[[aop-ataspectj-advice-params-generics]]
|
||||
=== Advice Parameters and Generics
|
||||
|
||||
Spring AOP can handle generics used in class declarations and method parameters. Suppose
|
||||
you have a generic type like the following:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
public interface Sample<T> {
|
||||
void sampleGenericMethod(T param);
|
||||
void sampleGenericCollectionMethod(Collection<T> param);
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
interface Sample<T> {
|
||||
fun sampleGenericMethod(param: T)
|
||||
fun sampleGenericCollectionMethod(param: Collection<T>)
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
You can restrict interception of method types to certain parameter types by
|
||||
tying the advice parameter to the parameter type for which you want to intercept the method:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
@Before("execution(* ..Sample+.sampleGenericMethod(*)) && args(param)")
|
||||
public void beforeSampleMethod(MyType param) {
|
||||
// Advice implementation
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
@Before("execution(* ..Sample+.sampleGenericMethod(*)) && args(param)")
|
||||
fun beforeSampleMethod(param: MyType) {
|
||||
// Advice implementation
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
This approach does not work for generic collections. So you cannot define a
|
||||
pointcut as follows:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
@Before("execution(* ..Sample+.sampleGenericCollectionMethod(*)) && args(param)")
|
||||
public void beforeSampleMethod(Collection<MyType> param) {
|
||||
// Advice implementation
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
@Before("execution(* ..Sample+.sampleGenericCollectionMethod(*)) && args(param)")
|
||||
fun beforeSampleMethod(param: Collection<MyType>) {
|
||||
// Advice implementation
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
To make this work, we would have to inspect every element of the collection, which is not
|
||||
reasonable, as we also cannot decide how to treat `null` values in general. To achieve
|
||||
something similar to this, you have to type the parameter to `Collection<?>` and manually
|
||||
check the type of the elements.
|
||||
|
||||
[[aop-ataspectj-advice-params-names]]
|
||||
=== Determining Argument Names
|
||||
|
||||
Parameter binding in advice invocations relies on matching the names used in pointcut
|
||||
expressions to the parameter names declared in advice and pointcut method signatures.
|
||||
|
||||
NOTE: This section uses the terms _argument_ and _parameter_ interchangeably, since
|
||||
AspectJ APIs refer to parameter names as argument names.
|
||||
|
||||
Spring AOP uses the following `ParameterNameDiscoverer` implementations to determine
|
||||
parameter names. Each discoverer will be given a chance to discover parameter names, and
|
||||
the first successful discoverer wins. If none of the registered discoverers is capable
|
||||
of determining parameter names, an exception will be thrown.
|
||||
|
||||
`AspectJAnnotationParameterNameDiscoverer` :: Uses parameter names that have been explicitly
|
||||
specified by the user via the `argNames` attribute in the corresponding advice or
|
||||
pointcut annotation. See xref:core/aop/ataspectj/advice.adoc#aop-ataspectj-advice-params-names-explicit[Explicit Argument Names] for details.
|
||||
`KotlinReflectionParameterNameDiscoverer` :: Uses Kotlin reflection APIs to determine
|
||||
parameter names. This discoverer is only used if such APIs are present on the classpath.
|
||||
`StandardReflectionParameterNameDiscoverer` :: Uses the standard `java.lang.reflect.Parameter`
|
||||
API to determine parameter names. Requires that code be compiled with the `-parameters`
|
||||
flag for `javac`. Recommended approach on Java 8+.
|
||||
`LocalVariableTableParameterNameDiscoverer` :: Analyzes the local variable table available
|
||||
in the byte code of the advice class to determine parameter names from debug information.
|
||||
Requires that code be compiled with debug symbols (`-g:vars` at a minimum). Deprecated
|
||||
as of Spring Framework 6.0 for removal in Spring Framework 6.1 in favor of compiling
|
||||
code with `-parameters`. Not supported in a GraalVM native image.
|
||||
`AspectJAdviceParameterNameDiscoverer` :: Deduces parameter names from the pointcut
|
||||
expression, `returning`, and `throwing` clauses. See the
|
||||
{api-spring-framework}/aop/aspectj/AspectJAdviceParameterNameDiscoverer.html[javadoc]
|
||||
for details on the algorithm used.
|
||||
|
||||
[[aop-ataspectj-advice-params-names-explicit]]
|
||||
=== Explicit Argument Names
|
||||
|
||||
@AspectJ advice and pointcut annotations have an optional `argNames` attribute that you
|
||||
can use to specify the argument names of the annotated method.
|
||||
|
||||
[TIP]
|
||||
====
|
||||
If an @AspectJ aspect has been compiled by the AspectJ compiler (`ajc`) even without
|
||||
debug information, you do not need to add the `argNames` attribute, since the compiler
|
||||
retains the needed information.
|
||||
|
||||
Similarly, if an @AspectJ aspect has been compiled with `javac` using the `-parameters`
|
||||
flag, you do not need to add the `argNames` attribute, since the compiler retains the
|
||||
needed information.
|
||||
====
|
||||
|
||||
The following example shows how to use the `argNames` attribute:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
@Before(
|
||||
value = "com.xyz.Pointcuts.publicMethod() && target(bean) && @annotation(auditable)", // <1>
|
||||
argNames = "bean,auditable") // <2>
|
||||
public void audit(Object bean, Auditable auditable) {
|
||||
AuditCode code = auditable.value();
|
||||
// ... use code and bean
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
<1> References the `publicMethod` named pointcut defined in xref:core/aop/ataspectj/pointcuts.adoc#aop-pointcuts-combining[Combining Pointcut Expressions].
|
||||
<2> Declares `bean` and `auditable` as the argument names.
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
@Before(
|
||||
value = "com.xyz.Pointcuts.publicMethod() && target(bean) && @annotation(auditable)", // <1>
|
||||
argNames = "bean,auditable") // <2>
|
||||
fun audit(bean: Any, auditable: Auditable) {
|
||||
val code = auditable.value()
|
||||
// ... use code and bean
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
<1> References the `publicMethod` named pointcut defined in xref:core/aop/ataspectj/pointcuts.adoc#aop-pointcuts-combining[Combining Pointcut Expressions].
|
||||
<2> Declares `bean` and `auditable` as the argument names.
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
If the first parameter is of type `JoinPoint`, `ProceedingJoinPoint`, or
|
||||
`JoinPoint.StaticPart`, you can omit the name of the parameter from the value of the
|
||||
`argNames` attribute. For example, if you modify the preceding advice to receive the join
|
||||
point object, the `argNames` attribute does not need to include it:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
@Before(
|
||||
value = "com.xyz.Pointcuts.publicMethod() && target(bean) && @annotation(auditable)", // <1>
|
||||
argNames = "bean,auditable") // <2>
|
||||
public void audit(JoinPoint jp, Object bean, Auditable auditable) {
|
||||
AuditCode code = auditable.value();
|
||||
// ... use code, bean, and jp
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
<1> References the `publicMethod` named pointcut defined in xref:core/aop/ataspectj/pointcuts.adoc#aop-pointcuts-combining[Combining Pointcut Expressions].
|
||||
<2> Declares `bean` and `auditable` as the argument names.
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
@Before(
|
||||
value = "com.xyz.Pointcuts.publicMethod() && target(bean) && @annotation(auditable)", // <1>
|
||||
argNames = "bean,auditable") // <2>
|
||||
fun audit(jp: JoinPoint, bean: Any, auditable: Auditable) {
|
||||
val code = auditable.value()
|
||||
// ... use code, bean, and jp
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
<1> References the `publicMethod` named pointcut defined in xref:core/aop/ataspectj/pointcuts.adoc#aop-pointcuts-combining[Combining Pointcut Expressions].
|
||||
<2> Declares `bean` and `auditable` as the argument names.
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
The special treatment given to the first parameter of type `JoinPoint`,
|
||||
`ProceedingJoinPoint`, or `JoinPoint.StaticPart` is particularly convenient for advice
|
||||
methods that do not collect any other join point context. In such situations, you may
|
||||
omit the `argNames` attribute. For example, the following advice does not need to declare
|
||||
the `argNames` attribute:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
@Before("com.xyz.Pointcuts.publicMethod()") // <1>
|
||||
public void audit(JoinPoint jp) {
|
||||
// ... use jp
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
<1> References the `publicMethod` named pointcut defined in xref:core/aop/ataspectj/pointcuts.adoc#aop-pointcuts-combining[Combining Pointcut Expressions].
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
@Before("com.xyz.Pointcuts.publicMethod()") // <1>
|
||||
fun audit(jp: JoinPoint) {
|
||||
// ... use jp
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
<1> References the `publicMethod` named pointcut defined in xref:core/aop/ataspectj/pointcuts.adoc#aop-pointcuts-combining[Combining Pointcut Expressions].
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[aop-ataspectj-advice-proceeding-with-the-call]]
|
||||
=== Proceeding with Arguments
|
||||
|
||||
We remarked earlier that we would describe how to write a `proceed` call with
|
||||
arguments that works consistently across Spring AOP and AspectJ. The solution is
|
||||
to ensure that the advice signature binds each of the method parameters in order.
|
||||
The following example shows how to do so:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
@Around("execution(List<Account> find*(..)) && " +
|
||||
"com.xyz.CommonPointcuts.inDataAccessLayer() && " +
|
||||
"args(accountHolderNamePattern)") // <1>
|
||||
public Object preProcessQueryPattern(ProceedingJoinPoint pjp,
|
||||
String accountHolderNamePattern) throws Throwable {
|
||||
String newPattern = preProcess(accountHolderNamePattern);
|
||||
return pjp.proceed(new Object[] {newPattern});
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
<1> References the `inDataAccessLayer` named pointcut defined in xref:core/aop/ataspectj/pointcuts.adoc#aop-common-pointcuts[Sharing Named Pointcut Definitions].
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
@Around("execution(List<Account> find*(..)) && " +
|
||||
"com.xyz.CommonPointcuts.inDataAccessLayer() && " +
|
||||
"args(accountHolderNamePattern)") // <1>
|
||||
fun preProcessQueryPattern(pjp: ProceedingJoinPoint,
|
||||
accountHolderNamePattern: String): Any? {
|
||||
val newPattern = preProcess(accountHolderNamePattern)
|
||||
return pjp.proceed(arrayOf<Any>(newPattern))
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
<1> References the `inDataAccessLayer` named pointcut defined in xref:core/aop/ataspectj/pointcuts.adoc#aop-common-pointcuts[Sharing Named Pointcut Definitions].
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
In many cases, you do this binding anyway (as in the preceding example).
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[aop-ataspectj-advice-ordering]]
|
||||
== Advice Ordering
|
||||
|
||||
What happens when multiple pieces of advice all want to run at the same join point?
|
||||
Spring AOP follows the same precedence rules as AspectJ to determine the order of advice
|
||||
execution. The highest precedence advice runs first "on the way in" (so, given two pieces
|
||||
of before advice, the one with highest precedence runs first). "On the way out" from a
|
||||
join point, the highest precedence advice runs last (so, given two pieces of after
|
||||
advice, the one with the highest precedence will run second).
|
||||
|
||||
When two pieces of advice defined in different aspects both need to run at the same
|
||||
join point, unless you specify otherwise, the order of execution is undefined. You can
|
||||
control the order of execution by specifying precedence. This is done in the normal
|
||||
Spring way by either implementing the `org.springframework.core.Ordered` interface in
|
||||
the aspect class or annotating it with the `@Order` annotation. Given two aspects, the
|
||||
aspect returning the lower value from `Ordered.getOrder()` (or the annotation value) has
|
||||
the higher precedence.
|
||||
|
||||
[NOTE]
|
||||
====
|
||||
Each of the distinct advice types of a particular aspect is conceptually meant to apply
|
||||
to the join point directly. As a consequence, an `@AfterThrowing` advice method is not
|
||||
supposed to receive an exception from an accompanying `@After`/`@AfterReturning` method.
|
||||
|
||||
As of Spring Framework 5.2.7, advice methods defined in the same `@Aspect` class that
|
||||
need to run at the same join point are assigned precedence based on their advice type in
|
||||
the following order, from highest to lowest precedence: `@Around`, `@Before`, `@After`,
|
||||
`@AfterReturning`, `@AfterThrowing`. Note, however, that an `@After` advice method will
|
||||
effectively be invoked after any `@AfterReturning` or `@AfterThrowing` advice methods
|
||||
in the same aspect, following AspectJ's "after finally advice" semantics for `@After`.
|
||||
|
||||
When two pieces of the same type of advice (for example, two `@After` advice methods)
|
||||
defined in the same `@Aspect` class both need to run at the same join point, the ordering
|
||||
is undefined (since there is no way to retrieve the source code declaration order through
|
||||
reflection for javac-compiled classes). Consider collapsing such advice methods into one
|
||||
advice method per join point in each `@Aspect` class or refactor the pieces of advice into
|
||||
separate `@Aspect` classes that you can order at the aspect level via `Ordered` or `@Order`.
|
||||
====
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,61 +0,0 @@
|
||||
[[aop-aspectj-support]]
|
||||
= Enabling @AspectJ Support
|
||||
|
||||
To use @AspectJ aspects in a Spring configuration, you need to enable Spring support for
|
||||
configuring Spring AOP based on @AspectJ aspects and auto-proxying beans based on
|
||||
whether or not they are advised by those aspects. By auto-proxying, we mean that, if Spring
|
||||
determines that a bean is advised by one or more aspects, it automatically generates
|
||||
a proxy for that bean to intercept method invocations and ensures that advice is run
|
||||
as needed.
|
||||
|
||||
The @AspectJ support can be enabled with XML- or Java-style configuration. In either
|
||||
case, you also need to ensure that AspectJ's `aspectjweaver.jar` library is on the
|
||||
classpath of your application (version 1.9 or later). This library is available in the
|
||||
`lib` directory of an AspectJ distribution or from the Maven Central repository.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[aop-enable-aspectj-java]]
|
||||
== Enabling @AspectJ Support with Java Configuration
|
||||
|
||||
To enable @AspectJ support with Java `@Configuration`, add the `@EnableAspectJAutoProxy`
|
||||
annotation, as the following example shows:
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
@Configuration
|
||||
@EnableAspectJAutoProxy
|
||||
public class AppConfig {
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
@Configuration
|
||||
@EnableAspectJAutoProxy
|
||||
class AppConfig
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
[[aop-enable-aspectj-xml]]
|
||||
== Enabling @AspectJ Support with XML Configuration
|
||||
|
||||
To enable @AspectJ support with XML-based configuration, use the `aop:aspectj-autoproxy`
|
||||
element, as the following example shows:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<aop:aspectj-autoproxy/>
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
This assumes that you use schema support as described in
|
||||
xref:core/appendix/xsd-schemas.adoc[XML Schema-based configuration].
|
||||
See xref:core/appendix/xsd-schemas.adoc#aop[the AOP schema] for how to
|
||||
import the tags in the `aop` namespace.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
|
||||
[[aop-at-aspectj]]
|
||||
= Declaring an Aspect
|
||||
|
||||
With @AspectJ support enabled, any bean defined in your application context with a
|
||||
class that is an @AspectJ aspect (has the `@Aspect` annotation) is automatically
|
||||
detected by Spring and used to configure Spring AOP. The next two examples show the
|
||||
minimal steps required for a not-very-useful aspect.
|
||||
|
||||
The first of the two examples shows a regular bean definition in the application context
|
||||
that points to a bean class that is annotated with `@Aspect`:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<bean id="myAspect" class="com.xyz.NotVeryUsefulAspect">
|
||||
<!-- configure properties of the aspect here -->
|
||||
</bean>
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
The second of the two examples shows the `NotVeryUsefulAspect` class definition, which is
|
||||
annotated with `@Aspect`:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="primary",chomp="-packages",fold="none"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
package com.xyz;
|
||||
|
||||
import org.aspectj.lang.annotation.Aspect;
|
||||
|
||||
@Aspect
|
||||
public class NotVeryUsefulAspect {
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="secondary",chomp="-packages",fold="none"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
package com.xyz
|
||||
|
||||
import org.aspectj.lang.annotation.Aspect
|
||||
|
||||
@Aspect
|
||||
class NotVeryUsefulAspect
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
Aspects (classes annotated with `@Aspect`) can have methods and fields, the same as any
|
||||
other class. They can also contain pointcut, advice, and introduction (inter-type)
|
||||
declarations.
|
||||
|
||||
.Autodetecting aspects through component scanning
|
||||
NOTE: You can register aspect classes as regular beans in your Spring XML configuration,
|
||||
via `@Bean` methods in `@Configuration` classes, or have Spring autodetect them through
|
||||
classpath scanning -- the same as any other Spring-managed bean. However, note that the
|
||||
`@Aspect` annotation is not sufficient for autodetection in the classpath. For that
|
||||
purpose, you need to add a separate `@Component` annotation (or, alternatively, a custom
|
||||
stereotype annotation that qualifies, as per the rules of Spring's component scanner).
|
||||
|
||||
.Advising aspects with other aspects?
|
||||
NOTE: In Spring AOP, aspects themselves cannot be the targets of advice from other
|
||||
aspects. The `@Aspect` annotation on a class marks it as an aspect and, hence, excludes
|
||||
it from auto-proxying.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,183 +0,0 @@
|
||||
[[aop-ataspectj-example]]
|
||||
= An AOP Example
|
||||
|
||||
Now that you have seen how all the constituent parts work, we can put them together to do
|
||||
something useful.
|
||||
|
||||
The execution of business services can sometimes fail due to concurrency issues (for
|
||||
example, a deadlock loser). If the operation is retried, it is likely to succeed
|
||||
on the next try. For business services where it is appropriate to retry in such
|
||||
conditions (idempotent operations that do not need to go back to the user for conflict
|
||||
resolution), we want to transparently retry the operation to avoid the client seeing a
|
||||
`PessimisticLockingFailureException`. This is a requirement that clearly cuts across
|
||||
multiple services in the service layer and, hence, is ideal for implementing through an
|
||||
aspect.
|
||||
|
||||
Because we want to retry the operation, we need to use around advice so that we can
|
||||
call `proceed` multiple times. The following listing shows the basic aspect implementation:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
@Aspect
|
||||
public class ConcurrentOperationExecutor implements Ordered {
|
||||
|
||||
private static final int DEFAULT_MAX_RETRIES = 2;
|
||||
|
||||
private int maxRetries = DEFAULT_MAX_RETRIES;
|
||||
private int order = 1;
|
||||
|
||||
public void setMaxRetries(int maxRetries) {
|
||||
this.maxRetries = maxRetries;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public int getOrder() {
|
||||
return this.order;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public void setOrder(int order) {
|
||||
this.order = order;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Around("com.xyz.CommonPointcuts.businessService()") // <1>
|
||||
public Object doConcurrentOperation(ProceedingJoinPoint pjp) throws Throwable {
|
||||
int numAttempts = 0;
|
||||
PessimisticLockingFailureException lockFailureException;
|
||||
do {
|
||||
numAttempts++;
|
||||
try {
|
||||
return pjp.proceed();
|
||||
}
|
||||
catch(PessimisticLockingFailureException ex) {
|
||||
lockFailureException = ex;
|
||||
}
|
||||
} while(numAttempts <= this.maxRetries);
|
||||
throw lockFailureException;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
<1> References the `businessService` named pointcut defined in xref:core/aop/ataspectj/pointcuts.adoc#aop-common-pointcuts[Sharing Named Pointcut Definitions].
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
@Aspect
|
||||
class ConcurrentOperationExecutor : Ordered {
|
||||
|
||||
private val DEFAULT_MAX_RETRIES = 2
|
||||
private var maxRetries = DEFAULT_MAX_RETRIES
|
||||
private var order = 1
|
||||
|
||||
fun setMaxRetries(maxRetries: Int) {
|
||||
this.maxRetries = maxRetries
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
override fun getOrder(): Int {
|
||||
return this.order
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fun setOrder(order: Int) {
|
||||
this.order = order
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Around("com.xyz.CommonPointcuts.businessService()") // <1>
|
||||
fun doConcurrentOperation(pjp: ProceedingJoinPoint): Any? {
|
||||
var numAttempts = 0
|
||||
var lockFailureException: PessimisticLockingFailureException
|
||||
do {
|
||||
numAttempts++
|
||||
try {
|
||||
return pjp.proceed()
|
||||
} catch (ex: PessimisticLockingFailureException) {
|
||||
lockFailureException = ex
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
} while (numAttempts <= this.maxRetries)
|
||||
throw lockFailureException
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
<1> References the `businessService` named pointcut defined in xref:core/aop/ataspectj/pointcuts.adoc#aop-common-pointcuts[Sharing Named Pointcut Definitions].
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
Note that the aspect implements the `Ordered` interface so that we can set the precedence of
|
||||
the aspect higher than the transaction advice (we want a fresh transaction each time we
|
||||
retry). The `maxRetries` and `order` properties are both configured by Spring. The
|
||||
main action happens in the `doConcurrentOperation` around advice. Notice that, for the
|
||||
moment, we apply the retry logic to each `businessService`. We try to proceed,
|
||||
and if we fail with a `PessimisticLockingFailureException`, we try again, unless
|
||||
we have exhausted all of our retry attempts.
|
||||
|
||||
The corresponding Spring configuration follows:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<aop:aspectj-autoproxy/>
|
||||
|
||||
<bean id="concurrentOperationExecutor"
|
||||
class="com.xyz.service.impl.ConcurrentOperationExecutor">
|
||||
<property name="maxRetries" value="3"/>
|
||||
<property name="order" value="100"/>
|
||||
</bean>
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
To refine the aspect so that it retries only idempotent operations, we might define the following
|
||||
`Idempotent` annotation:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
@Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
|
||||
// marker annotation
|
||||
public @interface Idempotent {
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
@Retention(AnnotationRetention.RUNTIME)
|
||||
// marker annotation
|
||||
annotation class Idempotent
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
We can then use the annotation to annotate the implementation of service operations. The change
|
||||
to the aspect to retry only idempotent operations involves refining the pointcut
|
||||
expression so that only `@Idempotent` operations match, as follows:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
@Around("execution(* com.xyz..service.*.*(..)) && " +
|
||||
"@annotation(com.xyz.service.Idempotent)")
|
||||
public Object doConcurrentOperation(ProceedingJoinPoint pjp) throws Throwable {
|
||||
// ...
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
@Around("execution(* com.xyz..service.*.*(..)) && " +
|
||||
"@annotation(com.xyz.service.Idempotent)")
|
||||
fun doConcurrentOperation(pjp: ProceedingJoinPoint): Any? {
|
||||
// ...
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,65 +0,0 @@
|
||||
[[aop-instantiation-models]]
|
||||
= Aspect Instantiation Models
|
||||
|
||||
NOTE: This is an advanced topic. If you are just starting out with AOP, you can safely skip
|
||||
it until later.
|
||||
|
||||
By default, there is a single instance of each aspect within the application
|
||||
context. AspectJ calls this the singleton instantiation model. It is possible to define
|
||||
aspects with alternate lifecycles. Spring supports AspectJ's `perthis`, `pertarget`, and
|
||||
`pertypewithin` instantiation models; `percflow` and `percflowbelow` are not currently
|
||||
supported.
|
||||
|
||||
You can declare a `perthis` aspect by specifying a `perthis` clause in the `@Aspect`
|
||||
annotation. Consider the following example:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
@Aspect("perthis(execution(* com.xyz..service.*.*(..)))")
|
||||
public class MyAspect {
|
||||
|
||||
private int someState;
|
||||
|
||||
@Before("execution(* com.xyz..service.*.*(..))")
|
||||
public void recordServiceUsage() {
|
||||
// ...
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
@Aspect("perthis(execution(* com.xyz..service.*.*(..)))")
|
||||
class MyAspect {
|
||||
|
||||
private val someState: Int = 0
|
||||
|
||||
@Before("execution(* com.xyz..service.*.*(..))")
|
||||
fun recordServiceUsage() {
|
||||
// ...
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
In the preceding example, the effect of the `perthis` clause is that one aspect instance
|
||||
is created for each unique service object that performs a business service (each unique
|
||||
object bound to `this` at join points matched by the pointcut expression). The aspect
|
||||
instance is created the first time that a method is invoked on the service object. The
|
||||
aspect goes out of scope when the service object goes out of scope. Before the aspect
|
||||
instance is created, none of the advice within it runs. As soon as the aspect instance
|
||||
has been created, the advice declared within it runs at matched join points, but only
|
||||
when the service object is the one with which this aspect is associated. See the AspectJ
|
||||
Programming Guide for more information on `per` clauses.
|
||||
|
||||
The `pertarget` instantiation model works in exactly the same way as `perthis`, but it
|
||||
creates one aspect instance for each unique target object at matched join points.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,79 +0,0 @@
|
||||
[[aop-introductions]]
|
||||
= Introductions
|
||||
|
||||
Introductions (known as inter-type declarations in AspectJ) enable an aspect to declare
|
||||
that advised objects implement a given interface, and to provide an implementation of
|
||||
that interface on behalf of those objects.
|
||||
|
||||
You can make an introduction by using the `@DeclareParents` annotation. This annotation
|
||||
is used to declare that matching types have a new parent (hence the name). For example,
|
||||
given an interface named `UsageTracked` and an implementation of that interface named
|
||||
`DefaultUsageTracked`, the following aspect declares that all implementors of service
|
||||
interfaces also implement the `UsageTracked` interface (e.g. for statistics via JMX):
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
@Aspect
|
||||
public class UsageTracking {
|
||||
|
||||
@DeclareParents(value="com.xyz.service.*+", defaultImpl=DefaultUsageTracked.class)
|
||||
public static UsageTracked mixin;
|
||||
|
||||
@Before("execution(* com.xyz..service.*.*(..)) && this(usageTracked)")
|
||||
public void recordUsage(UsageTracked usageTracked) {
|
||||
usageTracked.incrementUseCount();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
@Aspect
|
||||
class UsageTracking {
|
||||
|
||||
companion object {
|
||||
@DeclareParents(value = "com.xyz.service.*+",
|
||||
defaultImpl = DefaultUsageTracked::class)
|
||||
lateinit var mixin: UsageTracked
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Before("execution(* com.xyz..service.*.*(..)) && this(usageTracked)")
|
||||
fun recordUsage(usageTracked: UsageTracked) {
|
||||
usageTracked.incrementUseCount()
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
The interface to be implemented is determined by the type of the annotated field. The
|
||||
`value` attribute of the `@DeclareParents` annotation is an AspectJ type pattern. Any
|
||||
bean of a matching type implements the `UsageTracked` interface. Note that, in the
|
||||
before advice of the preceding example, service beans can be directly used as
|
||||
implementations of the `UsageTracked` interface. If accessing a bean programmatically,
|
||||
you would write the following:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
UsageTracked usageTracked = context.getBean("myService", UsageTracked.class);
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
val usageTracked = context.getBean("myService", UsageTracked.class)
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,586 +0,0 @@
|
||||
[[aop-pointcuts]]
|
||||
= Declaring a Pointcut
|
||||
|
||||
Pointcuts determine join points of interest and thus enable us to control
|
||||
when advice runs. Spring AOP only supports method execution join points for Spring
|
||||
beans, so you can think of a pointcut as matching the execution of methods on Spring
|
||||
beans. A pointcut declaration has two parts: a signature comprising a name and any
|
||||
parameters and a pointcut expression that determines exactly which method
|
||||
executions we are interested in. In the @AspectJ annotation-style of AOP, a pointcut
|
||||
signature is provided by a regular method definition, and the pointcut expression is
|
||||
indicated by using the `@Pointcut` annotation (the method serving as the pointcut signature
|
||||
must have a `void` return type).
|
||||
|
||||
An example may help make this distinction between a pointcut signature and a pointcut
|
||||
expression clear. The following example defines a pointcut named `anyOldTransfer` that
|
||||
matches the execution of any method named `transfer`:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
@Pointcut("execution(* transfer(..))") // the pointcut expression
|
||||
private void anyOldTransfer() {} // the pointcut signature
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
@Pointcut("execution(* transfer(..))") // the pointcut expression
|
||||
private fun anyOldTransfer() {} // the pointcut signature
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
The pointcut expression that forms the value of the `@Pointcut` annotation is a regular
|
||||
AspectJ pointcut expression. For a full discussion of AspectJ's pointcut language, see
|
||||
the https://www.eclipse.org/aspectj/doc/released/progguide/index.html[AspectJ
|
||||
Programming Guide] (and, for extensions, the
|
||||
https://www.eclipse.org/aspectj/doc/released/adk15notebook/index.html[AspectJ 5
|
||||
Developer's Notebook]) or one of the books on AspectJ (such as _Eclipse AspectJ_, by Colyer
|
||||
et al., or _AspectJ in Action_, by Ramnivas Laddad).
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[aop-pointcuts-designators]]
|
||||
== Supported Pointcut Designators
|
||||
|
||||
Spring AOP supports the following AspectJ pointcut designators (PCD) for use in pointcut
|
||||
expressions:
|
||||
|
||||
* `execution`: For matching method execution join points. This is the primary
|
||||
pointcut designator to use when working with Spring AOP.
|
||||
* `within`: Limits matching to join points within certain types (the execution
|
||||
of a method declared within a matching type when using Spring AOP).
|
||||
* `this`: Limits matching to join points (the execution of methods when using Spring
|
||||
AOP) where the bean reference (Spring AOP proxy) is an instance of the given type.
|
||||
* `target`: Limits matching to join points (the execution of methods when using
|
||||
Spring AOP) where the target object (application object being proxied) is an instance
|
||||
of the given type.
|
||||
* `args`: Limits matching to join points (the execution of methods when using Spring
|
||||
AOP) where the arguments are instances of the given types.
|
||||
* `@target`: Limits matching to join points (the execution of methods when using
|
||||
Spring AOP) where the class of the executing object has an annotation of the given type.
|
||||
* `@args`: Limits matching to join points (the execution of methods when using Spring
|
||||
AOP) where the runtime type of the actual arguments passed have annotations of the
|
||||
given types.
|
||||
* `@within`: Limits matching to join points within types that have the given
|
||||
annotation (the execution of methods declared in types with the given annotation when
|
||||
using Spring AOP).
|
||||
* `@annotation`: Limits matching to join points where the subject of the join point
|
||||
(the method being run in Spring AOP) has the given annotation.
|
||||
|
||||
.Other pointcut types
|
||||
****
|
||||
The full AspectJ pointcut language supports additional pointcut designators that are not
|
||||
supported in Spring: `call`, `get`, `set`, `preinitialization`,
|
||||
`staticinitialization`, `initialization`, `handler`, `adviceexecution`, `withincode`, `cflow`,
|
||||
`cflowbelow`, `if`, `@this`, and `@withincode`. Use of these pointcut designators in pointcut
|
||||
expressions interpreted by Spring AOP results in an `IllegalArgumentException` being
|
||||
thrown.
|
||||
|
||||
The set of pointcut designators supported by Spring AOP may be extended in future
|
||||
releases to support more of the AspectJ pointcut designators.
|
||||
****
|
||||
|
||||
Because Spring AOP limits matching to only method execution join points, the preceding discussion
|
||||
of the pointcut designators gives a narrower definition than you can find in the
|
||||
AspectJ programming guide. In addition, AspectJ itself has type-based semantics and, at
|
||||
an execution join point, both `this` and `target` refer to the same object: the
|
||||
object executing the method. Spring AOP is a proxy-based system and differentiates
|
||||
between the proxy object itself (which is bound to `this`) and the target object behind the
|
||||
proxy (which is bound to `target`).
|
||||
|
||||
[NOTE]
|
||||
====
|
||||
Due to the proxy-based nature of Spring's AOP framework, calls within the target object
|
||||
are, by definition, not intercepted. For JDK proxies, only public interface method
|
||||
calls on the proxy can be intercepted. With CGLIB, public and protected method calls on
|
||||
the proxy are intercepted (and even package-visible methods, if necessary). However,
|
||||
common interactions through proxies should always be designed through public signatures.
|
||||
|
||||
Note that pointcut definitions are generally matched against any intercepted method.
|
||||
If a pointcut is strictly meant to be public-only, even in a CGLIB proxy scenario with
|
||||
potential non-public interactions through proxies, it needs to be defined accordingly.
|
||||
|
||||
If your interception needs include method calls or even constructors within the target
|
||||
class, consider the use of Spring-driven xref:core/aop/using-aspectj.adoc#aop-aj-ltw[native AspectJ weaving] instead
|
||||
of Spring's proxy-based AOP framework. This constitutes a different mode of AOP usage
|
||||
with different characteristics, so be sure to make yourself familiar with weaving
|
||||
before making a decision.
|
||||
====
|
||||
|
||||
Spring AOP also supports an additional PCD named `bean`. This PCD lets you limit
|
||||
the matching of join points to a particular named Spring bean or to a set of named
|
||||
Spring beans (when using wildcards). The `bean` PCD has the following form:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,indent=0,subs="verbatim"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
bean(idOrNameOfBean)
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
The `idOrNameOfBean` token can be the name of any Spring bean. Limited wildcard
|
||||
support that uses the `*` character is provided, so, if you establish some naming
|
||||
conventions for your Spring beans, you can write a `bean` PCD expression
|
||||
to select them. As is the case with other pointcut designators, the `bean` PCD can
|
||||
be used with the `&&` (and), `||` (or), and `!` (negation) operators, too.
|
||||
|
||||
[NOTE]
|
||||
====
|
||||
The `bean` PCD is supported only in Spring AOP and not in
|
||||
native AspectJ weaving. It is a Spring-specific extension to the standard PCDs that
|
||||
AspectJ defines and is, therefore, not available for aspects declared in the `@Aspect` model.
|
||||
|
||||
The `bean` PCD operates at the instance level (building on the Spring bean name
|
||||
concept) rather than at the type level only (to which weaving-based AOP is limited).
|
||||
Instance-based pointcut designators are a special capability of Spring's
|
||||
proxy-based AOP framework and its close integration with the Spring bean factory, where
|
||||
it is natural and straightforward to identify specific beans by name.
|
||||
====
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[aop-pointcuts-combining]]
|
||||
== Combining Pointcut Expressions
|
||||
|
||||
You can combine pointcut expressions by using `&&,` `||` and `!`. You can also refer to
|
||||
pointcut expressions by name. The following example shows three pointcut expressions:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="primary",chomp="-packages"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
package com.xyz;
|
||||
|
||||
public class Pointcuts {
|
||||
|
||||
@Pointcut("execution(public * *(..))")
|
||||
public void publicMethod() {} // <1>
|
||||
|
||||
@Pointcut("within(com.xyz.trading..*)")
|
||||
public void inTrading() {} // <2>
|
||||
|
||||
@Pointcut("publicMethod() && inTrading()")
|
||||
public void tradingOperation() {} // <3>
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
<1> `publicMethod` matches if a method execution join point represents the execution
|
||||
of any public method.
|
||||
<2> `inTrading` matches if a method execution is in the trading module.
|
||||
<3> `tradingOperation` matches if a method execution represents any public method in the
|
||||
trading module.
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="secondary",chomp="-packages"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
package com.xyz
|
||||
|
||||
class Pointcuts {
|
||||
|
||||
@Pointcut("execution(public * *(..))")
|
||||
fun publicMethod() {} // <1>
|
||||
|
||||
@Pointcut("within(com.xyz.trading..*)")
|
||||
fun inTrading() {} // <2>
|
||||
|
||||
@Pointcut("publicMethod() && inTrading()")
|
||||
fun tradingOperation() {} // <3>
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
<1> `publicMethod` matches if a method execution join point represents the execution
|
||||
of any public method.
|
||||
<2> `inTrading` matches if a method execution is in the trading module.
|
||||
<3> `tradingOperation` matches if a method execution represents any public method in the
|
||||
trading module.
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
It is a best practice to build more complex pointcut expressions out of smaller _named
|
||||
pointcuts_, as shown above. When referring to pointcuts by name, normal Java visibility
|
||||
rules apply (you can see `private` pointcuts in the same type, `protected` pointcuts in
|
||||
the hierarchy, `public` pointcuts anywhere, and so on). Visibility does not affect
|
||||
pointcut matching.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[aop-common-pointcuts]]
|
||||
== Sharing Named Pointcut Definitions
|
||||
|
||||
When working with enterprise applications, developers often have the need to refer to
|
||||
modules of the application and particular sets of operations from within several aspects.
|
||||
We recommend defining a dedicated class that captures commonly used _named pointcut_
|
||||
expressions for this purpose. Such a class typically resembles the following
|
||||
`CommonPointcuts` example (though what you name the class is up to you):
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="primary",chomp="-packages",fold="none"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
package com.xyz;
|
||||
|
||||
import org.aspectj.lang.annotation.Pointcut;
|
||||
|
||||
public class CommonPointcuts {
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* A join point is in the web layer if the method is defined
|
||||
* in a type in the com.xyz.web package or any sub-package
|
||||
* under that.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
@Pointcut("within(com.xyz.web..*)")
|
||||
public void inWebLayer() {}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* A join point is in the service layer if the method is defined
|
||||
* in a type in the com.xyz.service package or any sub-package
|
||||
* under that.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
@Pointcut("within(com.xyz.service..*)")
|
||||
public void inServiceLayer() {}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* A join point is in the data access layer if the method is defined
|
||||
* in a type in the com.xyz.dao package or any sub-package
|
||||
* under that.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
@Pointcut("within(com.xyz.dao..*)")
|
||||
public void inDataAccessLayer() {}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* A business service is the execution of any method defined on a service
|
||||
* interface. This definition assumes that interfaces are placed in the
|
||||
* "service" package, and that implementation types are in sub-packages.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* If you group service interfaces by functional area (for example,
|
||||
* in packages com.xyz.abc.service and com.xyz.def.service) then
|
||||
* the pointcut expression "execution(* com.xyz..service.*.*(..))"
|
||||
* could be used instead.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Alternatively, you can write the expression using the 'bean'
|
||||
* PCD, like so "bean(*Service)". (This assumes that you have
|
||||
* named your Spring service beans in a consistent fashion.)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
@Pointcut("execution(* com.xyz..service.*.*(..))")
|
||||
public void businessService() {}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* A data access operation is the execution of any method defined on a
|
||||
* DAO interface. This definition assumes that interfaces are placed in the
|
||||
* "dao" package, and that implementation types are in sub-packages.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
@Pointcut("execution(* com.xyz.dao.*.*(..))")
|
||||
public void dataAccessOperation() {}
|
||||
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="secondary",chomp="-packages",fold="none"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
package com.xyz
|
||||
|
||||
import org.aspectj.lang.annotation.Pointcut
|
||||
|
||||
class CommonPointcuts {
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* A join point is in the web layer if the method is defined
|
||||
* in a type in the com.xyz.web package or any sub-package
|
||||
* under that.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
@Pointcut("within(com.xyz.web..*)")
|
||||
fun inWebLayer() {}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* A join point is in the service layer if the method is defined
|
||||
* in a type in the com.xyz.service package or any sub-package
|
||||
* under that.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
@Pointcut("within(com.xyz.service..*)")
|
||||
fun inServiceLayer() {}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* A join point is in the data access layer if the method is defined
|
||||
* in a type in the com.xyz.dao package or any sub-package
|
||||
* under that.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
@Pointcut("within(com.xyz.dao..*)")
|
||||
fun inDataAccessLayer() {}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* A business service is the execution of any method defined on a service
|
||||
* interface. This definition assumes that interfaces are placed in the
|
||||
* "service" package, and that implementation types are in sub-packages.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* If you group service interfaces by functional area (for example,
|
||||
* in packages com.xyz.abc.service and com.xyz.def.service) then
|
||||
* the pointcut expression "execution(* com.xyz..service.*.*(..))"
|
||||
* could be used instead.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Alternatively, you can write the expression using the 'bean'
|
||||
* PCD, like so "bean(*Service)". (This assumes that you have
|
||||
* named your Spring service beans in a consistent fashion.)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
@Pointcut("execution(* com.xyz..service.*.*(..))")
|
||||
fun businessService() {}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* A data access operation is the execution of any method defined on a
|
||||
* DAO interface. This definition assumes that interfaces are placed in the
|
||||
* "dao" package, and that implementation types are in sub-packages.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
@Pointcut("execution(* com.xyz.dao.*.*(..))")
|
||||
fun dataAccessOperation() {}
|
||||
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
You can refer to the pointcuts defined in such a class anywhere you need a pointcut
|
||||
expression by referencing the fully-qualified name of the class combined with the
|
||||
`@Pointcut` method's name. For example, to make the service layer transactional, you
|
||||
could write the following which references the
|
||||
`com.xyz.CommonPointcuts.businessService()` _named pointcut_:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<aop:config>
|
||||
<aop:advisor
|
||||
pointcut="com.xyz.CommonPointcuts.businessService()"
|
||||
advice-ref="tx-advice"/>
|
||||
</aop:config>
|
||||
|
||||
<tx:advice id="tx-advice">
|
||||
<tx:attributes>
|
||||
<tx:method name="*" propagation="REQUIRED"/>
|
||||
</tx:attributes>
|
||||
</tx:advice>
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
The `<aop:config>` and `<aop:advisor>` elements are discussed in xref:core/aop/schema.adoc[Schema-based AOP Support]. The
|
||||
transaction elements are discussed in xref:data-access/transaction.adoc[Transaction Management].
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[aop-pointcuts-examples]]
|
||||
== Examples
|
||||
|
||||
Spring AOP users are likely to use the `execution` pointcut designator the most often.
|
||||
The format of an execution expression follows:
|
||||
|
||||
[literal,indent=0,subs="verbatim"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
execution(modifiers-pattern?
|
||||
ret-type-pattern
|
||||
declaring-type-pattern?name-pattern(param-pattern)
|
||||
throws-pattern?)
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
All parts except the returning type pattern (`ret-type-pattern` in the preceding snippet),
|
||||
the name pattern, and the parameters pattern are optional. The returning type pattern determines
|
||||
what the return type of the method must be in order for a join point to be matched.
|
||||
`{asterisk}` is most frequently used as the returning type pattern. It matches any return
|
||||
type. A fully-qualified type name matches only when the method returns the given
|
||||
type. The name pattern matches the method name. You can use the `{asterisk}` wildcard as all or
|
||||
part of a name pattern. If you specify a declaring type pattern,
|
||||
include a trailing `.` to join it to the name pattern component.
|
||||
The parameters pattern is slightly more complex: `()` matches a
|
||||
method that takes no parameters, whereas `(..)` matches any number (zero or more) of parameters.
|
||||
The `({asterisk})` pattern matches a method that takes one parameter of any type.
|
||||
`(*,String)` matches a method that takes two parameters. The first can be of any type, while the
|
||||
second must be a `String`. Consult the
|
||||
https://www.eclipse.org/aspectj/doc/released/progguide/semantics-pointcuts.html[Language
|
||||
Semantics] section of the AspectJ Programming Guide for more information.
|
||||
|
||||
The following examples show some common pointcut expressions:
|
||||
|
||||
* The execution of any public method:
|
||||
+
|
||||
[literal,indent=0,subs="verbatim"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
execution(public * *(..))
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
* The execution of any method with a name that begins with `set`:
|
||||
+
|
||||
[literal,indent=0,subs="verbatim"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
execution(* set*(..))
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
* The execution of any method defined by the `AccountService` interface:
|
||||
+
|
||||
[literal,indent=0,subs="verbatim"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
execution(* com.xyz.service.AccountService.*(..))
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
* The execution of any method defined in the `service` package:
|
||||
+
|
||||
[literal,indent=0,subs="verbatim"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
execution(* com.xyz.service.*.*(..))
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
* The execution of any method defined in the service package or one of its sub-packages:
|
||||
+
|
||||
[literal,indent=0,subs="verbatim"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
execution(* com.xyz.service..*.*(..))
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
* Any join point (method execution only in Spring AOP) within the service package:
|
||||
+
|
||||
[literal,indent=0,subs="verbatim"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
within(com.xyz.service.*)
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
* Any join point (method execution only in Spring AOP) within the service package or one of its
|
||||
sub-packages:
|
||||
+
|
||||
[literal,indent=0,subs="verbatim"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
within(com.xyz.service..*)
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
* Any join point (method execution only in Spring AOP) where the proxy implements the
|
||||
`AccountService` interface:
|
||||
+
|
||||
[literal,indent=0,subs="verbatim"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
this(com.xyz.service.AccountService)
|
||||
----
|
||||
+
|
||||
NOTE: `this` is more commonly used in a binding form. See the section on xref:core/aop/ataspectj/advice.adoc[Declaring Advice]
|
||||
for how to make the proxy object available in the advice body.
|
||||
|
||||
* Any join point (method execution only in Spring AOP) where the target object
|
||||
implements the `AccountService` interface:
|
||||
+
|
||||
[literal,indent=0,subs="verbatim"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
target(com.xyz.service.AccountService)
|
||||
----
|
||||
+
|
||||
NOTE: `target` is more commonly used in a binding form. See the xref:core/aop/ataspectj/advice.adoc[Declaring Advice] section
|
||||
for how to make the target object available in the advice body.
|
||||
|
||||
* Any join point (method execution only in Spring AOP) that takes a single parameter
|
||||
and where the argument passed at runtime is `Serializable`:
|
||||
+
|
||||
[literal,indent=0,subs="verbatim"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
args(java.io.Serializable)
|
||||
----
|
||||
+
|
||||
NOTE: `args` is more commonly used in a binding form. See the xref:core/aop/ataspectj/advice.adoc[Declaring Advice] section
|
||||
for how to make the method arguments available in the advice body.
|
||||
+
|
||||
Note that the pointcut given in this example is different from `execution(*
|
||||
*(java.io.Serializable))`. The args version matches if the argument passed at runtime is
|
||||
`Serializable`, and the execution version matches if the method signature declares a single
|
||||
parameter of type `Serializable`.
|
||||
|
||||
* Any join point (method execution only in Spring AOP) where the target object has a
|
||||
`@Transactional` annotation:
|
||||
+
|
||||
[literal,indent=0,subs="verbatim"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
@target(org.springframework.transaction.annotation.Transactional)
|
||||
----
|
||||
+
|
||||
NOTE: You can also use `@target` in a binding form. See the xref:core/aop/ataspectj/advice.adoc[Declaring Advice] section for
|
||||
how to make the annotation object available in the advice body.
|
||||
|
||||
* Any join point (method execution only in Spring AOP) where the declared type of the
|
||||
target object has an `@Transactional` annotation:
|
||||
+
|
||||
[literal,indent=0,subs="verbatim"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
@within(org.springframework.transaction.annotation.Transactional)
|
||||
----
|
||||
+
|
||||
NOTE: You can also use `@within` in a binding form. See the xref:core/aop/ataspectj/advice.adoc[Declaring Advice] section for
|
||||
how to make the annotation object available in the advice body.
|
||||
|
||||
* Any join point (method execution only in Spring AOP) where the executing method has an
|
||||
`@Transactional` annotation:
|
||||
+
|
||||
[literal,indent=0,subs="verbatim"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
@annotation(org.springframework.transaction.annotation.Transactional)
|
||||
----
|
||||
+
|
||||
NOTE: You can also use `@annotation` in a binding form. See the xref:core/aop/ataspectj/advice.adoc[Declaring Advice] section
|
||||
for how to make the annotation object available in the advice body.
|
||||
|
||||
* Any join point (method execution only in Spring AOP) which takes a single parameter,
|
||||
and where the runtime type of the argument passed has the `@Classified` annotation:
|
||||
+
|
||||
[literal,indent=0,subs="verbatim"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
@args(com.xyz.security.Classified)
|
||||
----
|
||||
+
|
||||
NOTE: You can also use `@args` in a binding form. See the xref:core/aop/ataspectj/advice.adoc[Declaring Advice] section
|
||||
how to make the annotation object(s) available in the advice body.
|
||||
|
||||
* Any join point (method execution only in Spring AOP) on a Spring bean named
|
||||
`tradeService`:
|
||||
+
|
||||
[literal,indent=0,subs="verbatim"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
bean(tradeService)
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
* Any join point (method execution only in Spring AOP) on Spring beans having names that
|
||||
match the wildcard expression `*Service`:
|
||||
+
|
||||
[literal,indent=0,subs="verbatim"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
bean(*Service)
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[writing-good-pointcuts]]
|
||||
== Writing Good Pointcuts
|
||||
|
||||
During compilation, AspectJ processes pointcuts in order to optimize matching
|
||||
performance. Examining code and determining if each join point matches (statically or
|
||||
dynamically) a given pointcut is a costly process. (A dynamic match means the match
|
||||
cannot be fully determined from static analysis and that a test is placed in the code to
|
||||
determine if there is an actual match when the code is running). On first encountering a
|
||||
pointcut declaration, AspectJ rewrites it into an optimal form for the matching
|
||||
process. What does this mean? Basically, pointcuts are rewritten in DNF (Disjunctive
|
||||
Normal Form) and the components of the pointcut are sorted such that those components
|
||||
that are cheaper to evaluate are checked first. This means you do not have to worry
|
||||
about understanding the performance of various pointcut designators and may supply them
|
||||
in any order in a pointcut declaration.
|
||||
|
||||
However, AspectJ can work only with what it is told. For optimal performance of
|
||||
matching, you should think about what you are trying to achieve and narrow the search
|
||||
space for matches as much as possible in the definition. The existing designators
|
||||
naturally fall into one of three groups: kinded, scoping, and contextual:
|
||||
|
||||
* Kinded designators select a particular kind of join point:
|
||||
`execution`, `get`, `set`, `call`, and `handler`.
|
||||
* Scoping designators select a group of join points of interest
|
||||
(probably of many kinds): `within` and `withincode`
|
||||
* Contextual designators match (and optionally bind) based on context:
|
||||
`this`, `target`, and `@annotation`
|
||||
|
||||
A well written pointcut should include at least the first two types (kinded and
|
||||
scoping). You can include the contextual designators to match based on
|
||||
join point context or bind that context for use in the advice. Supplying only a
|
||||
kinded designator or only a contextual designator works but could affect weaving
|
||||
performance (time and memory used), due to extra processing and analysis. Scoping
|
||||
designators are very fast to match, and using them means AspectJ can very quickly
|
||||
dismiss groups of join points that should not be further processed. A good
|
||||
pointcut should always include one if possible.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,113 +0,0 @@
|
||||
[[aop-choosing]]
|
||||
= Choosing which AOP Declaration Style to Use
|
||||
|
||||
Once you have decided that an aspect is the best approach for implementing a given
|
||||
requirement, how do you decide between using Spring AOP or AspectJ and between the
|
||||
Aspect language (code) style, the @AspectJ annotation style, or the Spring XML style? These
|
||||
decisions are influenced by a number of factors including application requirements,
|
||||
development tools, and team familiarity with AOP.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[aop-spring-or-aspectj]]
|
||||
== Spring AOP or Full AspectJ?
|
||||
|
||||
Use the simplest thing that can work. Spring AOP is simpler than using full AspectJ, as
|
||||
there is no requirement to introduce the AspectJ compiler / weaver into your development
|
||||
and build processes. If you only need to advise the execution of operations on Spring
|
||||
beans, Spring AOP is the right choice. If you need to advise objects not managed by
|
||||
the Spring container (such as domain objects, typically), you need to use
|
||||
AspectJ. You also need to use AspectJ if you wish to advise join points other than
|
||||
simple method executions (for example, field get or set join points and so on).
|
||||
|
||||
When you use AspectJ, you have the choice of the AspectJ language syntax (also known as
|
||||
the "code style") or the @AspectJ annotation style. If aspects play a large
|
||||
role in your design, and you are able to use the https://www.eclipse.org/ajdt/[AspectJ
|
||||
Development Tools (AJDT)] plugin for Eclipse, the AspectJ language syntax is the
|
||||
preferred option. It is cleaner and simpler because the language was purposefully
|
||||
designed for writing aspects. If you do not use Eclipse or have only a few aspects
|
||||
that do not play a major role in your application, you may want to consider using
|
||||
the @AspectJ style, sticking with regular Java compilation in your IDE, and adding
|
||||
an aspect weaving phase to your build script.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[aop-ataspectj-or-xml]]
|
||||
== @AspectJ or XML for Spring AOP?
|
||||
|
||||
If you have chosen to use Spring AOP, you have a choice of @AspectJ or XML style.
|
||||
There are various tradeoffs to consider.
|
||||
|
||||
The XML style may be most familiar to existing Spring users, and it is backed by genuine
|
||||
POJOs. When using AOP as a tool to configure enterprise services, XML can be a good
|
||||
choice (a good test is whether you consider the pointcut expression to be a part of your
|
||||
configuration that you might want to change independently). With the XML style, it is
|
||||
arguably clearer from your configuration which aspects are present in the system.
|
||||
|
||||
The XML style has two disadvantages. First, it does not fully encapsulate the
|
||||
implementation of the requirement it addresses in a single place. The DRY principle says
|
||||
that there should be a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation of any piece of
|
||||
knowledge within a system. When using the XML style, the knowledge of how a requirement
|
||||
is implemented is split across the declaration of the backing bean class and the XML in
|
||||
the configuration file. When you use the @AspectJ style, this information is encapsulated
|
||||
in a single module: the aspect. Secondly, the XML style is slightly more limited in what
|
||||
it can express than the @AspectJ style: Only the "singleton" aspect instantiation model
|
||||
is supported, and it is not possible to combine named pointcuts declared in XML.
|
||||
For example, in the @AspectJ style you can write something like the following:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
@Pointcut("execution(* get*())")
|
||||
public void propertyAccess() {}
|
||||
|
||||
@Pointcut("execution(com.xyz.Account+ *(..))")
|
||||
public void operationReturningAnAccount() {}
|
||||
|
||||
@Pointcut("propertyAccess() && operationReturningAnAccount()")
|
||||
public void accountPropertyAccess() {}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
@Pointcut("execution(* get*())")
|
||||
fun propertyAccess() {}
|
||||
|
||||
@Pointcut("execution(com.xyz.Account+ *(..))")
|
||||
fun operationReturningAnAccount() {}
|
||||
|
||||
@Pointcut("propertyAccess() && operationReturningAnAccount()")
|
||||
fun accountPropertyAccess() {}
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
In the XML style you can declare the first two pointcuts:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<aop:pointcut id="propertyAccess"
|
||||
expression="execution(* get*())"/>
|
||||
|
||||
<aop:pointcut id="operationReturningAnAccount"
|
||||
expression="execution(com.xyz.Account+ *(..))"/>
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
The downside of the XML approach is that you cannot define the
|
||||
`accountPropertyAccess` pointcut by combining these definitions.
|
||||
|
||||
The @AspectJ style supports additional instantiation models and richer pointcut
|
||||
composition. It has the advantage of keeping the aspect as a modular unit. It also has
|
||||
the advantage that the @AspectJ aspects can be understood (and thus consumed) both by
|
||||
Spring AOP and by AspectJ. So, if you later decide you need the capabilities of AspectJ
|
||||
to implement additional requirements, you can easily migrate to a classic AspectJ setup.
|
||||
In general, the Spring team prefers the @AspectJ style for custom aspects beyond simple
|
||||
configuration of enterprise services.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,79 +0,0 @@
|
||||
[[aop-introduction-defn]]
|
||||
= AOP Concepts
|
||||
|
||||
Let us begin by defining some central AOP concepts and terminology. These terms are not
|
||||
Spring-specific. Unfortunately, AOP terminology is not particularly intuitive.
|
||||
However, it would be even more confusing if Spring used its own terminology.
|
||||
|
||||
* Aspect: A modularization of a concern that cuts across multiple classes.
|
||||
Transaction management is a good example of a crosscutting concern in enterprise Java
|
||||
applications. In Spring AOP, aspects are implemented by using regular classes
|
||||
(the xref:core/aop/schema.adoc[schema-based approach]) or regular classes annotated with the
|
||||
`@Aspect` annotation (the xref:core/aop/ataspectj.adoc[@AspectJ style]).
|
||||
* Join point: A point during the execution of a program, such as the execution of a
|
||||
method or the handling of an exception. In Spring AOP, a join point always
|
||||
represents a method execution.
|
||||
* Advice: Action taken by an aspect at a particular join point. Different types of
|
||||
advice include "around", "before", and "after" advice. (Advice types are discussed
|
||||
later.) Many AOP frameworks, including Spring, model an advice as an interceptor and
|
||||
maintain a chain of interceptors around the join point.
|
||||
* Pointcut: A predicate that matches join points. Advice is associated with a
|
||||
pointcut expression and runs at any join point matched by the pointcut (for example,
|
||||
the execution of a method with a certain name). The concept of join points as matched
|
||||
by pointcut expressions is central to AOP, and Spring uses the AspectJ pointcut
|
||||
expression language by default.
|
||||
* Introduction: Declaring additional methods or fields on behalf of a type. Spring
|
||||
AOP lets you introduce new interfaces (and a corresponding implementation) to any
|
||||
advised object. For example, you could use an introduction to make a bean implement an
|
||||
`IsModified` interface, to simplify caching. (An introduction is known as an
|
||||
inter-type declaration in the AspectJ community.)
|
||||
* Target object: An object being advised by one or more aspects. Also referred to as
|
||||
the "advised object". Since Spring AOP is implemented by using runtime proxies, this
|
||||
object is always a proxied object.
|
||||
* AOP proxy: An object created by the AOP framework in order to implement the aspect
|
||||
contracts (advise method executions and so on). In the Spring Framework, an AOP proxy
|
||||
is a JDK dynamic proxy or a CGLIB proxy.
|
||||
* Weaving: linking aspects with other application types or objects to create an
|
||||
advised object. This can be done at compile time (using the AspectJ compiler, for
|
||||
example), load time, or at runtime. Spring AOP, like other pure Java AOP frameworks,
|
||||
performs weaving at runtime.
|
||||
|
||||
Spring AOP includes the following types of advice:
|
||||
|
||||
* Before advice: Advice that runs before a join point but that does not have
|
||||
the ability to prevent execution flow proceeding to the join point (unless it throws
|
||||
an exception).
|
||||
* After returning advice: Advice to be run after a join point completes
|
||||
normally (for example, if a method returns without throwing an exception).
|
||||
* After throwing advice: Advice to be run if a method exits by throwing an
|
||||
exception.
|
||||
* After (finally) advice: Advice to be run regardless of the means by which a
|
||||
join point exits (normal or exceptional return).
|
||||
* Around advice: Advice that surrounds a join point such as a method invocation.
|
||||
This is the most powerful kind of advice. Around advice can perform custom behavior
|
||||
before and after the method invocation. It is also responsible for choosing whether to
|
||||
proceed to the join point or to shortcut the advised method execution by returning its
|
||||
own return value or throwing an exception.
|
||||
|
||||
Around advice is the most general kind of advice. Since Spring AOP, like AspectJ,
|
||||
provides a full range of advice types, we recommend that you use the least powerful
|
||||
advice type that can implement the required behavior. For example, if you need only to
|
||||
update a cache with the return value of a method, you are better off implementing an
|
||||
after returning advice than an around advice, although an around advice can accomplish
|
||||
the same thing. Using the most specific advice type provides a simpler programming model
|
||||
with less potential for errors. For example, you do not need to invoke the `proceed()`
|
||||
method on the `JoinPoint` used for around advice, and, hence, you cannot fail to invoke it.
|
||||
|
||||
All advice parameters are statically typed so that you work with advice parameters of
|
||||
the appropriate type (e.g. the type of the return value from a method execution) rather
|
||||
than `Object` arrays.
|
||||
|
||||
The concept of join points matched by pointcuts is the key to AOP, which distinguishes
|
||||
it from older technologies offering only interception. Pointcuts enable advice to be
|
||||
targeted independently of the object-oriented hierarchy. For example, you can apply an
|
||||
around advice providing declarative transaction management to a set of methods that span
|
||||
multiple objects (such as all business operations in the service layer).
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,22 +0,0 @@
|
||||
[[aop-introduction-proxies]]
|
||||
= AOP Proxies
|
||||
:page-section-summary-toc: 1
|
||||
|
||||
Spring AOP defaults to using standard JDK dynamic proxies for AOP proxies. This
|
||||
enables any interface (or set of interfaces) to be proxied.
|
||||
|
||||
Spring AOP can also use CGLIB proxies. This is necessary to proxy classes rather than
|
||||
interfaces. By default, CGLIB is used if a business object does not implement an
|
||||
interface. As it is good practice to program to interfaces rather than classes, business
|
||||
classes normally implement one or more business interfaces. It is possible to
|
||||
xref:core/aop/proxying.adoc[force the use of CGLIB], in those (hopefully rare) cases where you
|
||||
need to advise a method that is not declared on an interface or where you need to
|
||||
pass a proxied object to a method as a concrete type.
|
||||
|
||||
It is important to grasp the fact that Spring AOP is proxy-based. See
|
||||
xref:core/aop/proxying.adoc#aop-understanding-aop-proxies[Understanding AOP Proxies] for a thorough examination of exactly what this
|
||||
implementation detail actually means.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,61 +0,0 @@
|
||||
[[aop-introduction-spring-defn]]
|
||||
= Spring AOP Capabilities and Goals
|
||||
|
||||
Spring AOP is implemented in pure Java. There is no need for a special compilation
|
||||
process. Spring AOP does not need to control the class loader hierarchy and is thus
|
||||
suitable for use in a servlet container or application server.
|
||||
|
||||
Spring AOP currently supports only method execution join points (advising the execution
|
||||
of methods on Spring beans). Field interception is not implemented, although support for
|
||||
field interception could be added without breaking the core Spring AOP APIs. If you need
|
||||
to advise field access and update join points, consider a language such as AspectJ.
|
||||
|
||||
Spring AOP's approach to AOP differs from that of most other AOP frameworks. The aim is
|
||||
not to provide the most complete AOP implementation (although Spring AOP is quite
|
||||
capable). Rather, the aim is to provide a close integration between AOP implementation and
|
||||
Spring IoC, to help solve common problems in enterprise applications.
|
||||
|
||||
Thus, for example, the Spring Framework's AOP functionality is normally used in
|
||||
conjunction with the Spring IoC container. Aspects are configured by using normal bean
|
||||
definition syntax (although this allows powerful "auto-proxying" capabilities). This is a
|
||||
crucial difference from other AOP implementations. You cannot do some things
|
||||
easily or efficiently with Spring AOP, such as advise very fine-grained objects (typically,
|
||||
domain objects). AspectJ is the best choice in such cases. However, our
|
||||
experience is that Spring AOP provides an excellent solution to most problems in
|
||||
enterprise Java applications that are amenable to AOP.
|
||||
|
||||
Spring AOP never strives to compete with AspectJ to provide a comprehensive AOP
|
||||
solution. We believe that both proxy-based frameworks such as Spring AOP and full-blown
|
||||
frameworks such as AspectJ are valuable and that they are complementary, rather than in
|
||||
competition. Spring seamlessly integrates Spring AOP and IoC with AspectJ, to enable
|
||||
all uses of AOP within a consistent Spring-based application
|
||||
architecture. This integration does not affect the Spring AOP API or the AOP Alliance
|
||||
API. Spring AOP remains backward-compatible. See xref:core/aop-api.adoc[the following chapter]
|
||||
for a discussion of the Spring AOP APIs.
|
||||
|
||||
[NOTE]
|
||||
====
|
||||
One of the central tenets of the Spring Framework is that of non-invasiveness. This
|
||||
is the idea that you should not be forced to introduce framework-specific classes and
|
||||
interfaces into your business or domain model. However, in some places, the Spring Framework
|
||||
does give you the option to introduce Spring Framework-specific dependencies into your
|
||||
codebase. The rationale in giving you such options is because, in certain scenarios, it
|
||||
might be just plain easier to read or code some specific piece of functionality in such
|
||||
a way. However, the Spring Framework (almost) always offers you the choice: You have the
|
||||
freedom to make an informed decision as to which option best suits your particular use
|
||||
case or scenario.
|
||||
|
||||
One such choice that is relevant to this chapter is that of which AOP framework (and
|
||||
which AOP style) to choose. You have the choice of AspectJ, Spring AOP, or both. You
|
||||
also have the choice of either the @AspectJ annotation-style approach or the Spring XML
|
||||
configuration-style approach. The fact that this chapter chooses to introduce the
|
||||
@AspectJ-style approach first should not be taken as an indication that the Spring team
|
||||
favors the @AspectJ annotation-style approach over the Spring XML configuration-style.
|
||||
|
||||
See xref:core/aop/choosing.adoc[Choosing which AOP Declaration Style to Use] for a more complete discussion of the advantages and disadvantages of
|
||||
each style.
|
||||
====
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,12 +0,0 @@
|
||||
[[aop-mixing-styles]]
|
||||
= Mixing Aspect Types
|
||||
:page-section-summary-toc: 1
|
||||
|
||||
It is perfectly possible to mix @AspectJ style aspects by using the auto-proxying support,
|
||||
schema-defined `<aop:aspect>` aspects, `<aop:advisor>` declared advisors, and even proxies
|
||||
and interceptors in other styles in the same configuration. All of these are implemented
|
||||
by using the same underlying support mechanism and can co-exist without any difficulty.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,281 +0,0 @@
|
||||
[[aop-proxying]]
|
||||
= Proxying Mechanisms
|
||||
|
||||
Spring AOP uses either JDK dynamic proxies or CGLIB to create the proxy for a given
|
||||
target object. JDK dynamic proxies are built into the JDK, whereas CGLIB is a common
|
||||
open-source class definition library (repackaged into `spring-core`).
|
||||
|
||||
If the target object to be proxied implements at least one interface, a JDK dynamic
|
||||
proxy is used. All of the interfaces implemented by the target type are proxied.
|
||||
If the target object does not implement any interfaces, a CGLIB proxy is created.
|
||||
|
||||
If you want to force the use of CGLIB proxying (for example, to proxy every method
|
||||
defined for the target object, not only those implemented by its interfaces),
|
||||
you can do so. However, you should consider the following issues:
|
||||
|
||||
* With CGLIB, `final` methods cannot be advised, as they cannot be overridden in
|
||||
runtime-generated subclasses.
|
||||
* As of Spring 4.0, the constructor of your proxied object is NOT called twice anymore,
|
||||
since the CGLIB proxy instance is created through Objenesis. Only if your JVM does
|
||||
not allow for constructor bypassing, you might see double invocations and
|
||||
corresponding debug log entries from Spring's AOP support.
|
||||
|
||||
To force the use of CGLIB proxies, set the value of the `proxy-target-class` attribute
|
||||
of the `<aop:config>` element to true, as follows:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<aop:config proxy-target-class="true">
|
||||
<!-- other beans defined here... -->
|
||||
</aop:config>
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
To force CGLIB proxying when you use the @AspectJ auto-proxy support, set the
|
||||
`proxy-target-class` attribute of the `<aop:aspectj-autoproxy>` element to `true`,
|
||||
as follows:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<aop:aspectj-autoproxy proxy-target-class="true"/>
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
[NOTE]
|
||||
====
|
||||
Multiple `<aop:config/>` sections are collapsed into a single unified auto-proxy creator
|
||||
at runtime, which applies the _strongest_ proxy settings that any of the
|
||||
`<aop:config/>` sections (typically from different XML bean definition files) specified.
|
||||
This also applies to the `<tx:annotation-driven/>` and `<aop:aspectj-autoproxy/>`
|
||||
elements.
|
||||
|
||||
To be clear, using `proxy-target-class="true"` on `<tx:annotation-driven/>`,
|
||||
`<aop:aspectj-autoproxy/>`, or `<aop:config/>` elements forces the use of CGLIB
|
||||
proxies _for all three of them_.
|
||||
====
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[aop-understanding-aop-proxies]]
|
||||
== Understanding AOP Proxies
|
||||
|
||||
Spring AOP is proxy-based. It is vitally important that you grasp the semantics of
|
||||
what that last statement actually means before you write your own aspects or use any of
|
||||
the Spring AOP-based aspects supplied with the Spring Framework.
|
||||
|
||||
Consider first the scenario where you have a plain-vanilla, un-proxied,
|
||||
nothing-special-about-it, straight object reference, as the following
|
||||
code snippet shows:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
public class SimplePojo implements Pojo {
|
||||
|
||||
public void foo() {
|
||||
// this next method invocation is a direct call on the 'this' reference
|
||||
this.bar();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public void bar() {
|
||||
// some logic...
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
class SimplePojo : Pojo {
|
||||
|
||||
fun foo() {
|
||||
// this next method invocation is a direct call on the 'this' reference
|
||||
this.bar()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fun bar() {
|
||||
// some logic...
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
If you invoke a method on an object reference, the method is invoked directly on
|
||||
that object reference, as the following image and listing show:
|
||||
|
||||
image::aop-proxy-plain-pojo-call.png[]
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
public class Main {
|
||||
|
||||
public static void main(String[] args) {
|
||||
Pojo pojo = new SimplePojo();
|
||||
// this is a direct method call on the 'pojo' reference
|
||||
pojo.foo();
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
fun main() {
|
||||
val pojo = SimplePojo()
|
||||
// this is a direct method call on the 'pojo' reference
|
||||
pojo.foo()
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
Things change slightly when the reference that client code has is a proxy. Consider the
|
||||
following diagram and code snippet:
|
||||
|
||||
image::aop-proxy-call.png[]
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
public class Main {
|
||||
|
||||
public static void main(String[] args) {
|
||||
ProxyFactory factory = new ProxyFactory(new SimplePojo());
|
||||
factory.addInterface(Pojo.class);
|
||||
factory.addAdvice(new RetryAdvice());
|
||||
|
||||
Pojo pojo = (Pojo) factory.getProxy();
|
||||
// this is a method call on the proxy!
|
||||
pojo.foo();
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
fun main() {
|
||||
val factory = ProxyFactory(SimplePojo())
|
||||
factory.addInterface(Pojo::class.java)
|
||||
factory.addAdvice(RetryAdvice())
|
||||
|
||||
val pojo = factory.proxy as Pojo
|
||||
// this is a method call on the proxy!
|
||||
pojo.foo()
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
The key thing to understand here is that the client code inside the `main(..)` method
|
||||
of the `Main` class has a reference to the proxy. This means that method calls on that
|
||||
object reference are calls on the proxy. As a result, the proxy can delegate to all of
|
||||
the interceptors (advice) that are relevant to that particular method call. However,
|
||||
once the call has finally reached the target object (the `SimplePojo` reference in
|
||||
this case), any method calls that it may make on itself, such as `this.bar()` or
|
||||
`this.foo()`, are going to be invoked against the `this` reference, and not the proxy.
|
||||
This has important implications. It means that self-invocation is not going to result
|
||||
in the advice associated with a method invocation getting a chance to run.
|
||||
|
||||
Okay, so what is to be done about this? The best approach (the term "best" is used
|
||||
loosely here) is to refactor your code such that the self-invocation does not happen.
|
||||
This does entail some work on your part, but it is the best, least-invasive approach.
|
||||
The next approach is absolutely horrendous, and we hesitate to point it out, precisely
|
||||
because it is so horrendous. You can (painful as it is to us) totally tie the logic
|
||||
within your class to Spring AOP, as the following example shows:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
public class SimplePojo implements Pojo {
|
||||
|
||||
public void foo() {
|
||||
// this works, but... gah!
|
||||
((Pojo) AopContext.currentProxy()).bar();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public void bar() {
|
||||
// some logic...
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
class SimplePojo : Pojo {
|
||||
|
||||
fun foo() {
|
||||
// this works, but... gah!
|
||||
(AopContext.currentProxy() as Pojo).bar()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fun bar() {
|
||||
// some logic...
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
This totally couples your code to Spring AOP, and it makes the class itself aware of
|
||||
the fact that it is being used in an AOP context, which flies in the face of AOP. It
|
||||
also requires some additional configuration when the proxy is being created, as the
|
||||
following example shows:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
public class Main {
|
||||
|
||||
public static void main(String[] args) {
|
||||
ProxyFactory factory = new ProxyFactory(new SimplePojo());
|
||||
factory.addInterface(Pojo.class);
|
||||
factory.addAdvice(new RetryAdvice());
|
||||
factory.setExposeProxy(true);
|
||||
|
||||
Pojo pojo = (Pojo) factory.getProxy();
|
||||
// this is a method call on the proxy!
|
||||
pojo.foo();
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
fun main() {
|
||||
val factory = ProxyFactory(SimplePojo())
|
||||
factory.addInterface(Pojo::class.java)
|
||||
factory.addAdvice(RetryAdvice())
|
||||
factory.isExposeProxy = true
|
||||
|
||||
val pojo = factory.proxy as Pojo
|
||||
// this is a method call on the proxy!
|
||||
pojo.foo()
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
Finally, it must be noted that AspectJ does not have this self-invocation issue because
|
||||
it is not a proxy-based AOP framework.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,12 +0,0 @@
|
||||
[[aop-resources]]
|
||||
= Further Resources
|
||||
:page-section-summary-toc: 1
|
||||
|
||||
More information on AspectJ can be found on the https://www.eclipse.org/aspectj[AspectJ website].
|
||||
|
||||
_Eclipse AspectJ_ by Adrian Colyer et. al. (Addison-Wesley, 2005) provides a
|
||||
comprehensive introduction and reference for the AspectJ language.
|
||||
|
||||
_AspectJ in Action_, Second Edition by Ramnivas Laddad (Manning, 2009) comes highly
|
||||
recommended. The focus of the book is on AspectJ, but a lot of general AOP themes are
|
||||
explored (in some depth).
|
||||
@@ -1,987 +0,0 @@
|
||||
[[aop-schema]]
|
||||
= Schema-based AOP Support
|
||||
|
||||
If you prefer an XML-based format, Spring also offers support for defining aspects
|
||||
using the `aop` namespace tags. The exact same pointcut expressions and advice kinds
|
||||
as when using the @AspectJ style are supported. Hence, in this section we focus on
|
||||
that syntax and refer the reader to the discussion in the previous section
|
||||
(xref:core/aop/ataspectj.adoc[@AspectJ support]) for an understanding of writing pointcut expressions and the binding
|
||||
of advice parameters.
|
||||
|
||||
To use the aop namespace tags described in this section, you need to import the
|
||||
`spring-aop` schema, as described in xref:core/appendix/xsd-schemas.adoc[XML Schema-based configuration]
|
||||
. See xref:core/appendix/xsd-schemas.adoc#aop[the AOP schema]
|
||||
for how to import the tags in the `aop` namespace.
|
||||
|
||||
Within your Spring configurations, all aspect and advisor elements must be placed within
|
||||
an `<aop:config>` element (you can have more than one `<aop:config>` element in an
|
||||
application context configuration). An `<aop:config>` element can contain pointcut,
|
||||
advisor, and aspect elements (note that these must be declared in that order).
|
||||
|
||||
WARNING: The `<aop:config>` style of configuration makes heavy use of Spring's
|
||||
xref:core/aop-api/autoproxy.adoc[auto-proxying] mechanism. This can cause issues (such as advice
|
||||
not being woven) if you already use explicit auto-proxying through the use of
|
||||
`BeanNameAutoProxyCreator` or something similar. The recommended usage pattern is to
|
||||
use either only the `<aop:config>` style or only the `AutoProxyCreator` style and
|
||||
never mix them.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[aop-schema-declaring-an-aspect]]
|
||||
== Declaring an Aspect
|
||||
|
||||
When you use the schema support, an aspect is a regular Java object defined as a bean in
|
||||
your Spring application context. The state and behavior are captured in the fields and
|
||||
methods of the object, and the pointcut and advice information are captured in the XML.
|
||||
|
||||
You can declare an aspect by using the `<aop:aspect>` element, and reference the backing bean
|
||||
by using the `ref` attribute, as the following example shows:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<aop:config>
|
||||
<aop:aspect id="myAspect" ref="aBean">
|
||||
...
|
||||
</aop:aspect>
|
||||
</aop:config>
|
||||
|
||||
<bean id="aBean" class="...">
|
||||
...
|
||||
</bean>
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
The bean that backs the aspect (`aBean` in this case) can of course be configured and
|
||||
dependency injected just like any other Spring bean.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[aop-schema-pointcuts]]
|
||||
== Declaring a Pointcut
|
||||
|
||||
You can declare a _named pointcut_ inside an `<aop:config>` element, letting the pointcut
|
||||
definition be shared across several aspects and advisors.
|
||||
|
||||
A pointcut that represents the execution of any business service in the service layer can
|
||||
be defined as follows:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<aop:config>
|
||||
|
||||
<aop:pointcut id="businessService"
|
||||
expression="execution(* com.xyz.service.*.*(..))" />
|
||||
|
||||
</aop:config>
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Note that the pointcut expression itself uses the same AspectJ pointcut expression
|
||||
language as described in xref:core/aop/ataspectj.adoc[@AspectJ support]. If you use the schema based declaration
|
||||
style, you can also refer to _named pointcuts_ defined in `@Aspect` types within the
|
||||
pointcut expression. Thus, another way of defining the above pointcut would be as follows:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<aop:config>
|
||||
|
||||
<aop:pointcut id="businessService"
|
||||
expression="com.xyz.CommonPointcuts.businessService()" /> <1>
|
||||
|
||||
</aop:config>
|
||||
----
|
||||
<1> References the `businessService` named pointcut defined in xref:core/aop/ataspectj/pointcuts.adoc#aop-common-pointcuts[Sharing Named Pointcut Definitions].
|
||||
|
||||
Declaring a pointcut _inside_ an aspect is very similar to declaring a top-level pointcut,
|
||||
as the following example shows:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<aop:config>
|
||||
|
||||
<aop:aspect id="myAspect" ref="aBean">
|
||||
|
||||
<aop:pointcut id="businessService"
|
||||
expression="execution(* com.xyz.service.*.*(..))"/>
|
||||
|
||||
...
|
||||
</aop:aspect>
|
||||
|
||||
</aop:config>
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
In much the same way as an @AspectJ aspect, pointcuts declared by using the schema based
|
||||
definition style can collect join point context. For example, the following pointcut
|
||||
collects the `this` object as the join point context and passes it to the advice:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<aop:config>
|
||||
|
||||
<aop:aspect id="myAspect" ref="aBean">
|
||||
|
||||
<aop:pointcut id="businessService"
|
||||
expression="execution(* com.xyz.service.*.*(..)) && this(service)"/>
|
||||
|
||||
<aop:before pointcut-ref="businessService" method="monitor"/>
|
||||
|
||||
...
|
||||
</aop:aspect>
|
||||
|
||||
</aop:config>
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
The advice must be declared to receive the collected join point context by including
|
||||
parameters of the matching names, as follows:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
public void monitor(Object service) {
|
||||
// ...
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
fun monitor(service: Any) {
|
||||
// ...
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
When combining pointcut sub-expressions, `+&&+` is awkward within an XML
|
||||
document, so you can use the `and`, `or`, and `not` keywords in place of `+&&+`,
|
||||
`||`, and `!`, respectively. For example, the previous pointcut can be better written as
|
||||
follows:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<aop:config>
|
||||
|
||||
<aop:aspect id="myAspect" ref="aBean">
|
||||
|
||||
<aop:pointcut id="businessService"
|
||||
expression="execution(* com.xyz.service.*.*(..)) and this(service)"/>
|
||||
|
||||
<aop:before pointcut-ref="businessService" method="monitor"/>
|
||||
|
||||
...
|
||||
</aop:aspect>
|
||||
|
||||
</aop:config>
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Note that pointcuts defined in this way are referred to by their XML `id` and cannot be
|
||||
used as named pointcuts to form composite pointcuts. The named pointcut support in the
|
||||
schema-based definition style is thus more limited than that offered by the @AspectJ
|
||||
style.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[aop-schema-advice]]
|
||||
== Declaring Advice
|
||||
|
||||
The schema-based AOP support uses the same five kinds of advice as the @AspectJ style, and they have
|
||||
exactly the same semantics.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[aop-schema-advice-before]]
|
||||
=== Before Advice
|
||||
|
||||
Before advice runs before a matched method execution. It is declared inside an
|
||||
`<aop:aspect>` by using the `<aop:before>` element, as the following example shows:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<aop:aspect id="beforeExample" ref="aBean">
|
||||
|
||||
<aop:before
|
||||
pointcut-ref="dataAccessOperation"
|
||||
method="doAccessCheck"/>
|
||||
|
||||
...
|
||||
|
||||
</aop:aspect>
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
In the example above, `dataAccessOperation` is the `id` of a _named pointcut_ defined at
|
||||
the top (`<aop:config>`) level (see xref:core/aop/schema.adoc#aop-schema-pointcuts[Declaring a Pointcut]).
|
||||
|
||||
NOTE: As we noted in the discussion of the @AspectJ style, using _named pointcuts_ can
|
||||
significantly improve the readability of your code. See xref:core/aop/ataspectj/pointcuts.adoc#aop-common-pointcuts[Sharing Named Pointcut Definitions] for
|
||||
details.
|
||||
|
||||
To define the pointcut inline instead, replace the `pointcut-ref` attribute with a
|
||||
`pointcut` attribute, as follows:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<aop:aspect id="beforeExample" ref="aBean">
|
||||
|
||||
<aop:before
|
||||
pointcut="execution(* com.xyz.dao.*.*(..))"
|
||||
method="doAccessCheck"/>
|
||||
|
||||
...
|
||||
|
||||
</aop:aspect>
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
The `method` attribute identifies a method (`doAccessCheck`) that provides the body of
|
||||
the advice. This method must be defined for the bean referenced by the aspect element
|
||||
that contains the advice. Before a data access operation is performed (a method execution
|
||||
join point matched by the pointcut expression), the `doAccessCheck` method on the aspect
|
||||
bean is invoked.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[aop-schema-advice-after-returning]]
|
||||
=== After Returning Advice
|
||||
|
||||
After returning advice runs when a matched method execution completes normally. It is
|
||||
declared inside an `<aop:aspect>` in the same way as before advice. The following example
|
||||
shows how to declare it:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<aop:aspect id="afterReturningExample" ref="aBean">
|
||||
|
||||
<aop:after-returning
|
||||
pointcut="execution(* com.xyz.dao.*.*(..))"
|
||||
method="doAccessCheck"/>
|
||||
|
||||
...
|
||||
</aop:aspect>
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
As in the @AspectJ style, you can get the return value within the advice body.
|
||||
To do so, use the `returning` attribute to specify the name of the parameter to which
|
||||
the return value should be passed, as the following example shows:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<aop:aspect id="afterReturningExample" ref="aBean">
|
||||
|
||||
<aop:after-returning
|
||||
pointcut="execution(* com.xyz.dao.*.*(..))"
|
||||
returning="retVal"
|
||||
method="doAccessCheck"/>
|
||||
|
||||
...
|
||||
</aop:aspect>
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
The `doAccessCheck` method must declare a parameter named `retVal`. The type of this
|
||||
parameter constrains matching in the same way as described for `@AfterReturning`. For
|
||||
example, you can declare the method signature as follows:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
public void doAccessCheck(Object retVal) {...
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
fun doAccessCheck(retVal: Any) {...
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[aop-schema-advice-after-throwing]]
|
||||
=== After Throwing Advice
|
||||
|
||||
After throwing advice runs when a matched method execution exits by throwing an
|
||||
exception. It is declared inside an `<aop:aspect>` by using the `after-throwing` element,
|
||||
as the following example shows:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<aop:aspect id="afterThrowingExample" ref="aBean">
|
||||
|
||||
<aop:after-throwing
|
||||
pointcut="execution(* com.xyz.dao.*.*(..))"
|
||||
method="doRecoveryActions"/>
|
||||
|
||||
...
|
||||
</aop:aspect>
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
As in the @AspectJ style, you can get the thrown exception within the advice body.
|
||||
To do so, use the `throwing` attribute to specify the name of the parameter to
|
||||
which the exception should be passed as the following example shows:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<aop:aspect id="afterThrowingExample" ref="aBean">
|
||||
|
||||
<aop:after-throwing
|
||||
pointcut="execution(* com.xyz.dao.*.*(..))"
|
||||
throwing="dataAccessEx"
|
||||
method="doRecoveryActions"/>
|
||||
|
||||
...
|
||||
</aop:aspect>
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
The `doRecoveryActions` method must declare a parameter named `dataAccessEx`.
|
||||
The type of this parameter constrains matching in the same way as described for
|
||||
`@AfterThrowing`. For example, the method signature may be declared as follows:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
public void doRecoveryActions(DataAccessException dataAccessEx) {...
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
fun doRecoveryActions(dataAccessEx: DataAccessException) {...
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[aop-schema-advice-after-finally]]
|
||||
=== After (Finally) Advice
|
||||
|
||||
After (finally) advice runs no matter how a matched method execution exits.
|
||||
You can declare it by using the `after` element, as the following example shows:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<aop:aspect id="afterFinallyExample" ref="aBean">
|
||||
|
||||
<aop:after
|
||||
pointcut="execution(* com.xyz.dao.*.*(..))"
|
||||
method="doReleaseLock"/>
|
||||
|
||||
...
|
||||
</aop:aspect>
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[aop-schema-advice-around]]
|
||||
=== Around Advice
|
||||
|
||||
The last kind of advice is _around_ advice. Around advice runs "around" a matched
|
||||
method's execution. It has the opportunity to do work both before and after the method
|
||||
runs and to determine when, how, and even if the method actually gets to run at all.
|
||||
Around advice is often used if you need to share state before and after a method
|
||||
execution in a thread-safe manner – for example, starting and stopping a timer.
|
||||
|
||||
[TIP]
|
||||
====
|
||||
Always use the least powerful form of advice that meets your requirements.
|
||||
|
||||
For example, do not use _around_ advice if _before_ advice is sufficient for your needs.
|
||||
====
|
||||
|
||||
You can declare around advice by using the `aop:around` element. The advice method should
|
||||
declare `Object` as its return type, and the first parameter of the method must be of
|
||||
type `ProceedingJoinPoint`. Within the body of the advice method, you must invoke
|
||||
`proceed()` on the `ProceedingJoinPoint` in order for the underlying method to run.
|
||||
Invoking `proceed()` without arguments will result in the caller's original arguments
|
||||
being supplied to the underlying method when it is invoked. For advanced use cases, there
|
||||
is an overloaded variant of the `proceed()` method which accepts an array of arguments
|
||||
(`Object[]`). The values in the array will be used as the arguments to the underlying
|
||||
method when it is invoked. See xref:core/aop/ataspectj/advice.adoc#aop-ataspectj-around-advice[Around Advice] for notes on calling
|
||||
`proceed` with an `Object[]`.
|
||||
|
||||
The following example shows how to declare around advice in XML:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<aop:aspect id="aroundExample" ref="aBean">
|
||||
|
||||
<aop:around
|
||||
pointcut="execution(* com.xyz.service.*.*(..))"
|
||||
method="doBasicProfiling"/>
|
||||
|
||||
...
|
||||
</aop:aspect>
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
The implementation of the `doBasicProfiling` advice can be exactly the same as in the
|
||||
@AspectJ example (minus the annotation, of course), as the following example shows:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
public Object doBasicProfiling(ProceedingJoinPoint pjp) throws Throwable {
|
||||
// start stopwatch
|
||||
Object retVal = pjp.proceed();
|
||||
// stop stopwatch
|
||||
return retVal;
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
fun doBasicProfiling(pjp: ProceedingJoinPoint): Any? {
|
||||
// start stopwatch
|
||||
val retVal = pjp.proceed()
|
||||
// stop stopwatch
|
||||
return pjp.proceed()
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[aop-schema-params]]
|
||||
=== Advice Parameters
|
||||
|
||||
The schema-based declaration style supports fully typed advice in the same way as
|
||||
described for the @AspectJ support -- by matching pointcut parameters by name against
|
||||
advice method parameters. See xref:core/aop/ataspectj/advice.adoc#aop-ataspectj-advice-params[Advice Parameters] for details. If you wish
|
||||
to explicitly specify argument names for the advice methods (not relying on the
|
||||
detection strategies previously described), you can do so by using the `arg-names`
|
||||
attribute of the advice element, which is treated in the same manner as the `argNames`
|
||||
attribute in an advice annotation (as described in xref:core/aop/ataspectj/advice.adoc#aop-ataspectj-advice-params-names[Determining Argument Names]).
|
||||
The following example shows how to specify an argument name in XML:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<aop:before
|
||||
pointcut="com.xyz.Pointcuts.publicMethod() and @annotation(auditable)" <1>
|
||||
method="audit"
|
||||
arg-names="auditable" />
|
||||
----
|
||||
<1> References the `publicMethod` named pointcut defined in xref:core/aop/ataspectj/pointcuts.adoc#aop-pointcuts-combining[Combining Pointcut Expressions].
|
||||
|
||||
The `arg-names` attribute accepts a comma-delimited list of parameter names.
|
||||
|
||||
The following slightly more involved example of the XSD-based approach shows
|
||||
some around advice used in conjunction with a number of strongly typed parameters:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="primary",chomp="-packages"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
package com.xyz.service;
|
||||
|
||||
public interface PersonService {
|
||||
|
||||
Person getPerson(String personName, int age);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public class DefaultPersonService implements PersonService {
|
||||
|
||||
public Person getPerson(String name, int age) {
|
||||
return new Person(name, age);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="secondary",chomp="-packages"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
package com.xyz.service
|
||||
|
||||
interface PersonService {
|
||||
|
||||
fun getPerson(personName: String, age: Int): Person
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
class DefaultPersonService : PersonService {
|
||||
|
||||
fun getPerson(name: String, age: Int): Person {
|
||||
return Person(name, age)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
Next up is the aspect. Notice the fact that the `profile(..)` method accepts a number of
|
||||
strongly-typed parameters, the first of which happens to be the join point used to
|
||||
proceed with the method call. The presence of this parameter is an indication that the
|
||||
`profile(..)` is to be used as `around` advice, as the following example shows:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="primary",chomp="-packages"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
package com.xyz;
|
||||
|
||||
import org.aspectj.lang.ProceedingJoinPoint;
|
||||
import org.springframework.util.StopWatch;
|
||||
|
||||
public class SimpleProfiler {
|
||||
|
||||
public Object profile(ProceedingJoinPoint call, String name, int age) throws Throwable {
|
||||
StopWatch clock = new StopWatch("Profiling for '" + name + "' and '" + age + "'");
|
||||
try {
|
||||
clock.start(call.toShortString());
|
||||
return call.proceed();
|
||||
} finally {
|
||||
clock.stop();
|
||||
System.out.println(clock.prettyPrint());
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="secondary",chomp="-packages"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
package com.xyz
|
||||
|
||||
import org.aspectj.lang.ProceedingJoinPoint
|
||||
import org.springframework.util.StopWatch
|
||||
|
||||
class SimpleProfiler {
|
||||
|
||||
fun profile(call: ProceedingJoinPoint, name: String, age: Int): Any? {
|
||||
val clock = StopWatch("Profiling for '$name' and '$age'")
|
||||
try {
|
||||
clock.start(call.toShortString())
|
||||
return call.proceed()
|
||||
} finally {
|
||||
clock.stop()
|
||||
println(clock.prettyPrint())
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
Finally, the following example XML configuration effects the execution of the
|
||||
preceding advice for a particular join point:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans"
|
||||
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
|
||||
xmlns:aop="http://www.springframework.org/schema/aop"
|
||||
xsi:schemaLocation="
|
||||
http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans
|
||||
https://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans.xsd
|
||||
http://www.springframework.org/schema/aop
|
||||
https://www.springframework.org/schema/aop/spring-aop.xsd">
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- this is the object that will be proxied by Spring's AOP infrastructure -->
|
||||
<bean id="personService" class="com.xyz.service.DefaultPersonService"/>
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- this is the actual advice itself -->
|
||||
<bean id="profiler" class="com.xyz.SimpleProfiler"/>
|
||||
|
||||
<aop:config>
|
||||
<aop:aspect ref="profiler">
|
||||
|
||||
<aop:pointcut id="theExecutionOfSomePersonServiceMethod"
|
||||
expression="execution(* com.xyz.service.PersonService.getPerson(String,int))
|
||||
and args(name, age)"/>
|
||||
|
||||
<aop:around pointcut-ref="theExecutionOfSomePersonServiceMethod"
|
||||
method="profile"/>
|
||||
|
||||
</aop:aspect>
|
||||
</aop:config>
|
||||
|
||||
</beans>
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Consider the following driver script:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
public class Boot {
|
||||
|
||||
public static void main(String[] args) {
|
||||
ApplicationContext ctx = new ClassPathXmlApplicationContext("beans.xml");
|
||||
PersonService person = ctx.getBean(PersonService.class);
|
||||
person.getPerson("Pengo", 12);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
fun main() {
|
||||
val ctx = ClassPathXmlApplicationContext("beans.xml")
|
||||
val person = ctx.getBean(PersonService.class)
|
||||
person.getPerson("Pengo", 12)
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
With such a `Boot` class, we would get output similar to the following on standard output:
|
||||
|
||||
[literal,subs="verbatim"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
StopWatch 'Profiling for 'Pengo' and '12': running time (millis) = 0
|
||||
-----------------------------------------
|
||||
ms % Task name
|
||||
-----------------------------------------
|
||||
00000 ? execution(getFoo)
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[aop-ordering]]
|
||||
=== Advice Ordering
|
||||
|
||||
When multiple pieces of advice need to run at the same join point (executing method)
|
||||
the ordering rules are as described in xref:core/aop/ataspectj/advice.adoc#aop-ataspectj-advice-ordering[Advice Ordering]. The precedence
|
||||
between aspects is determined via the `order` attribute in the `<aop:aspect>` element or
|
||||
by either adding the `@Order` annotation to the bean that backs the aspect or by having
|
||||
the bean implement the `Ordered` interface.
|
||||
|
||||
[NOTE]
|
||||
====
|
||||
In contrast to the precedence rules for advice methods defined in the same `@Aspect`
|
||||
class, when two pieces of advice defined in the same `<aop:aspect>` element both need to
|
||||
run at the same join point, the precedence is determined by the order in which the advice
|
||||
elements are declared within the enclosing `<aop:aspect>` element, from highest to lowest
|
||||
precedence.
|
||||
|
||||
For example, given an `around` advice and a `before` advice defined in the same
|
||||
`<aop:aspect>` element that apply to the same join point, to ensure that the `around`
|
||||
advice has higher precedence than the `before` advice, the `<aop:around>` element must be
|
||||
declared before the `<aop:before>` element.
|
||||
|
||||
As a general rule of thumb, if you find that you have multiple pieces of advice defined
|
||||
in the same `<aop:aspect>` element that apply to the same join point, consider collapsing
|
||||
such advice methods into one advice method per join point in each `<aop:aspect>` element
|
||||
or refactor the pieces of advice into separate `<aop:aspect>` elements that you can order
|
||||
at the aspect level.
|
||||
====
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[aop-schema-introductions]]
|
||||
== Introductions
|
||||
|
||||
Introductions (known as inter-type declarations in AspectJ) let an aspect declare
|
||||
that advised objects implement a given interface and provide an implementation of
|
||||
that interface on behalf of those objects.
|
||||
|
||||
You can make an introduction by using the `aop:declare-parents` element inside an `aop:aspect`.
|
||||
You can use the `aop:declare-parents` element to declare that matching types have a new parent (hence the name).
|
||||
For example, given an interface named `UsageTracked` and an implementation of that interface named
|
||||
`DefaultUsageTracked`, the following aspect declares that all implementors of service
|
||||
interfaces also implement the `UsageTracked` interface. (In order to expose statistics
|
||||
through JMX for example.)
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<aop:aspect id="usageTrackerAspect" ref="usageTracking">
|
||||
|
||||
<aop:declare-parents
|
||||
types-matching="com.xyz.service.*+"
|
||||
implement-interface="com.xyz.service.tracking.UsageTracked"
|
||||
default-impl="com.xyz.service.tracking.DefaultUsageTracked"/>
|
||||
|
||||
<aop:before
|
||||
pointcut="execution(* com.xyz..service.*.*(..))
|
||||
and this(usageTracked)"
|
||||
method="recordUsage"/>
|
||||
|
||||
</aop:aspect>
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
The class that backs the `usageTracking` bean would then contain the following method:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
public void recordUsage(UsageTracked usageTracked) {
|
||||
usageTracked.incrementUseCount();
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
fun recordUsage(usageTracked: UsageTracked) {
|
||||
usageTracked.incrementUseCount()
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
The interface to be implemented is determined by the `implement-interface` attribute. The
|
||||
value of the `types-matching` attribute is an AspectJ type pattern. Any bean of a
|
||||
matching type implements the `UsageTracked` interface. Note that, in the before
|
||||
advice of the preceding example, service beans can be directly used as implementations of
|
||||
the `UsageTracked` interface. To access a bean programmatically, you could write the
|
||||
following:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
UsageTracked usageTracked = context.getBean("myService", UsageTracked.class);
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
val usageTracked = context.getBean("myService", UsageTracked.class)
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[aop-schema-instantiation-models]]
|
||||
== Aspect Instantiation Models
|
||||
|
||||
The only supported instantiation model for schema-defined aspects is the singleton
|
||||
model. Other instantiation models may be supported in future releases.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[aop-schema-advisors]]
|
||||
== Advisors
|
||||
|
||||
The concept of "advisors" comes from the AOP support defined in Spring
|
||||
and does not have a direct equivalent in AspectJ. An advisor is like a small
|
||||
self-contained aspect that has a single piece of advice. The advice itself is
|
||||
represented by a bean and must implement one of the advice interfaces described in
|
||||
xref:core/aop-api/advice.adoc#aop-api-advice-types[Advice Types in Spring]. Advisors can take advantage of AspectJ pointcut expressions.
|
||||
|
||||
Spring supports the advisor concept with the `<aop:advisor>` element. You most
|
||||
commonly see it used in conjunction with transactional advice, which also has its own
|
||||
namespace support in Spring. The following example shows an advisor:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<aop:config>
|
||||
|
||||
<aop:pointcut id="businessService"
|
||||
expression="execution(* com.xyz.service.*.*(..))"/>
|
||||
|
||||
<aop:advisor
|
||||
pointcut-ref="businessService"
|
||||
advice-ref="tx-advice" />
|
||||
|
||||
</aop:config>
|
||||
|
||||
<tx:advice id="tx-advice">
|
||||
<tx:attributes>
|
||||
<tx:method name="*" propagation="REQUIRED"/>
|
||||
</tx:attributes>
|
||||
</tx:advice>
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
As well as the `pointcut-ref` attribute used in the preceding example, you can also use the
|
||||
`pointcut` attribute to define a pointcut expression inline.
|
||||
|
||||
To define the precedence of an advisor so that the advice can participate in ordering,
|
||||
use the `order` attribute to define the `Ordered` value of the advisor.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[aop-schema-example]]
|
||||
== An AOP Schema Example
|
||||
|
||||
This section shows how the concurrent locking failure retry example from
|
||||
xref:core/aop/ataspectj/example.adoc[An AOP Example] looks when rewritten with the schema support.
|
||||
|
||||
The execution of business services can sometimes fail due to concurrency issues (for
|
||||
example, a deadlock loser). If the operation is retried, it is likely to succeed
|
||||
on the next try. For business services where it is appropriate to retry in such
|
||||
conditions (idempotent operations that do not need to go back to the user for conflict
|
||||
resolution), we want to transparently retry the operation to avoid the client seeing a
|
||||
`PessimisticLockingFailureException`. This is a requirement that clearly cuts across
|
||||
multiple services in the service layer and, hence, is ideal for implementing through an
|
||||
aspect.
|
||||
|
||||
Because we want to retry the operation, we need to use around advice so that we can
|
||||
call `proceed` multiple times. The following listing shows the basic aspect implementation
|
||||
(which is a regular Java class that uses the schema support):
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
public class ConcurrentOperationExecutor implements Ordered {
|
||||
|
||||
private static final int DEFAULT_MAX_RETRIES = 2;
|
||||
|
||||
private int maxRetries = DEFAULT_MAX_RETRIES;
|
||||
private int order = 1;
|
||||
|
||||
public void setMaxRetries(int maxRetries) {
|
||||
this.maxRetries = maxRetries;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public int getOrder() {
|
||||
return this.order;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public void setOrder(int order) {
|
||||
this.order = order;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public Object doConcurrentOperation(ProceedingJoinPoint pjp) throws Throwable {
|
||||
int numAttempts = 0;
|
||||
PessimisticLockingFailureException lockFailureException;
|
||||
do {
|
||||
numAttempts++;
|
||||
try {
|
||||
return pjp.proceed();
|
||||
}
|
||||
catch(PessimisticLockingFailureException ex) {
|
||||
lockFailureException = ex;
|
||||
}
|
||||
} while(numAttempts <= this.maxRetries);
|
||||
throw lockFailureException;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
class ConcurrentOperationExecutor : Ordered {
|
||||
|
||||
private val DEFAULT_MAX_RETRIES = 2
|
||||
|
||||
private var maxRetries = DEFAULT_MAX_RETRIES
|
||||
private var order = 1
|
||||
|
||||
fun setMaxRetries(maxRetries: Int) {
|
||||
this.maxRetries = maxRetries
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
override fun getOrder(): Int {
|
||||
return this.order
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fun setOrder(order: Int) {
|
||||
this.order = order
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fun doConcurrentOperation(pjp: ProceedingJoinPoint): Any? {
|
||||
var numAttempts = 0
|
||||
var lockFailureException: PessimisticLockingFailureException
|
||||
do {
|
||||
numAttempts++
|
||||
try {
|
||||
return pjp.proceed()
|
||||
} catch (ex: PessimisticLockingFailureException) {
|
||||
lockFailureException = ex
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
} while (numAttempts <= this.maxRetries)
|
||||
throw lockFailureException
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
Note that the aspect implements the `Ordered` interface so that we can set the precedence of
|
||||
the aspect higher than the transaction advice (we want a fresh transaction each time we
|
||||
retry). The `maxRetries` and `order` properties are both configured by Spring. The
|
||||
main action happens in the `doConcurrentOperation` around advice method. We try to
|
||||
proceed. If we fail with a `PessimisticLockingFailureException`, we try again,
|
||||
unless we have exhausted all of our retry attempts.
|
||||
|
||||
NOTE: This class is identical to the one used in the @AspectJ example, but with the
|
||||
annotations removed.
|
||||
|
||||
The corresponding Spring configuration is as follows:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<aop:config>
|
||||
|
||||
<aop:aspect id="concurrentOperationRetry" ref="concurrentOperationExecutor">
|
||||
|
||||
<aop:pointcut id="idempotentOperation"
|
||||
expression="execution(* com.xyz.service.*.*(..))"/>
|
||||
|
||||
<aop:around
|
||||
pointcut-ref="idempotentOperation"
|
||||
method="doConcurrentOperation"/>
|
||||
|
||||
</aop:aspect>
|
||||
|
||||
</aop:config>
|
||||
|
||||
<bean id="concurrentOperationExecutor"
|
||||
class="com.xyz.service.impl.ConcurrentOperationExecutor">
|
||||
<property name="maxRetries" value="3"/>
|
||||
<property name="order" value="100"/>
|
||||
</bean>
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Notice that, for the time being, we assume that all business services are idempotent. If
|
||||
this is not the case, we can refine the aspect so that it retries only genuinely
|
||||
idempotent operations, by introducing an `Idempotent` annotation and using the annotation
|
||||
to annotate the implementation of service operations, as the following example shows:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
@Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
|
||||
// marker annotation
|
||||
public @interface Idempotent {
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
@Retention(AnnotationRetention.RUNTIME)
|
||||
// marker annotation
|
||||
annotation class Idempotent
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
The
|
||||
change to the aspect to retry only idempotent operations involves refining the
|
||||
pointcut expression so that only `@Idempotent` operations match, as follows:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<aop:pointcut id="idempotentOperation"
|
||||
expression="execution(* com.xyz.service.*.*(..)) and
|
||||
@annotation(com.xyz.service.Idempotent)"/>
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,988 +0,0 @@
|
||||
[[aop-using-aspectj]]
|
||||
= Using AspectJ with Spring Applications
|
||||
|
||||
Everything we have covered so far in this chapter is pure Spring AOP. In this section,
|
||||
we look at how you can use the AspectJ compiler or weaver instead of or in
|
||||
addition to Spring AOP if your needs go beyond the facilities offered by Spring AOP
|
||||
alone.
|
||||
|
||||
Spring ships with a small AspectJ aspect library, which is available stand-alone in your
|
||||
distribution as `spring-aspects.jar`. You need to add this to your classpath in order
|
||||
to use the aspects in it. xref:core/aop/using-aspectj.adoc#aop-atconfigurable[Using AspectJ to Dependency Inject Domain Objects with Spring] and xref:core/aop/using-aspectj.adoc#aop-ajlib-other[Other Spring aspects for AspectJ] discuss the
|
||||
content of this library and how you can use it. xref:core/aop/using-aspectj.adoc#aop-aj-configure[Configuring AspectJ Aspects by Using Spring IoC] discusses how to
|
||||
dependency inject AspectJ aspects that are woven using the AspectJ compiler. Finally,
|
||||
xref:core/aop/using-aspectj.adoc#aop-aj-ltw[Load-time Weaving with AspectJ in the Spring Framework] provides an introduction to load-time weaving for Spring applications
|
||||
that use AspectJ.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[aop-atconfigurable]]
|
||||
== Using AspectJ to Dependency Inject Domain Objects with Spring
|
||||
|
||||
The Spring container instantiates and configures beans defined in your application
|
||||
context. It is also possible to ask a bean factory to configure a pre-existing
|
||||
object, given the name of a bean definition that contains the configuration to be applied.
|
||||
`spring-aspects.jar` contains an annotation-driven aspect that exploits this
|
||||
capability to allow dependency injection of any object. The support is intended to
|
||||
be used for objects created outside of the control of any container. Domain objects
|
||||
often fall into this category because they are often created programmatically with the
|
||||
`new` operator or by an ORM tool as a result of a database query.
|
||||
|
||||
The `@Configurable` annotation marks a class as being eligible for Spring-driven
|
||||
configuration. In the simplest case, you can use purely it as a marker annotation, as the
|
||||
following example shows:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="primary",chomp="-packages"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
package com.xyz.domain;
|
||||
|
||||
import org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.Configurable;
|
||||
|
||||
@Configurable
|
||||
public class Account {
|
||||
// ...
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="secondary",chomp="-packages"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
package com.xyz.domain
|
||||
|
||||
import org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.Configurable
|
||||
|
||||
@Configurable
|
||||
class Account {
|
||||
// ...
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
When used as a marker interface in this way, Spring configures new instances of the
|
||||
annotated type (`Account`, in this case) by using a bean definition (typically
|
||||
prototype-scoped) with the same name as the fully-qualified type name
|
||||
(`com.xyz.domain.Account`). Since the default name for a bean is the
|
||||
fully-qualified name of its type, a convenient way to declare the prototype definition
|
||||
is to omit the `id` attribute, as the following example shows:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<bean class="com.xyz.domain.Account" scope="prototype">
|
||||
<property name="fundsTransferService" ref="fundsTransferService"/>
|
||||
</bean>
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
If you want to explicitly specify the name of the prototype bean definition to use, you
|
||||
can do so directly in the annotation, as the following example shows:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="primary",chomp="-packages"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
package com.xyz.domain;
|
||||
|
||||
import org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.Configurable;
|
||||
|
||||
@Configurable("account")
|
||||
public class Account {
|
||||
// ...
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="secondary",chomp="-packages"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
package com.xyz.domain
|
||||
|
||||
import org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.Configurable
|
||||
|
||||
@Configurable("account")
|
||||
class Account {
|
||||
// ...
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
Spring now looks for a bean definition named `account` and uses that as the
|
||||
definition to configure new `Account` instances.
|
||||
|
||||
You can also use autowiring to avoid having to specify a dedicated bean definition at
|
||||
all. To have Spring apply autowiring, use the `autowire` property of the `@Configurable`
|
||||
annotation. You can specify either `@Configurable(autowire=Autowire.BY_TYPE)` or
|
||||
`@Configurable(autowire=Autowire.BY_NAME)` for autowiring by type or by name,
|
||||
respectively. As an alternative, it is preferable to specify explicit, annotation-driven
|
||||
dependency injection for your `@Configurable` beans through `@Autowired` or `@Inject`
|
||||
at the field or method level (see xref:core/beans/annotation-config.adoc[Annotation-based Container Configuration] for further details).
|
||||
|
||||
Finally, you can enable Spring dependency checking for the object references in the newly
|
||||
created and configured object by using the `dependencyCheck` attribute (for example,
|
||||
`@Configurable(autowire=Autowire.BY_NAME,dependencyCheck=true)`). If this attribute is
|
||||
set to `true`, Spring validates after configuration that all properties (which
|
||||
are not primitives or collections) have been set.
|
||||
|
||||
Note that using the annotation on its own does nothing. It is the
|
||||
`AnnotationBeanConfigurerAspect` in `spring-aspects.jar` that acts on the presence of
|
||||
the annotation. In essence, the aspect says, "after returning from the initialization of
|
||||
a new object of a type annotated with `@Configurable`, configure the newly created object
|
||||
using Spring in accordance with the properties of the annotation". In this context,
|
||||
"initialization" refers to newly instantiated objects (for example, objects instantiated
|
||||
with the `new` operator) as well as to `Serializable` objects that are undergoing
|
||||
deserialization (for example, through
|
||||
https://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/api/java/io/Serializable.html[readResolve()]).
|
||||
|
||||
[NOTE]
|
||||
=====
|
||||
One of the key phrases in the above paragraph is "in essence". For most cases, the
|
||||
exact semantics of "after returning from the initialization of a new object" are
|
||||
fine. In this context, "after initialization" means that the dependencies are
|
||||
injected after the object has been constructed. This means that the dependencies
|
||||
are not available for use in the constructor bodies of the class. If you want the
|
||||
dependencies to be injected before the constructor bodies run and thus be
|
||||
available for use in the body of the constructors, you need to define this on the
|
||||
`@Configurable` declaration, as follows:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
@Configurable(preConstruction = true)
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
@Configurable(preConstruction = true)
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
You can find more information about the language semantics of the various pointcut
|
||||
types in AspectJ
|
||||
https://www.eclipse.org/aspectj/doc/next/progguide/semantics-joinPoints.html[in this
|
||||
appendix] of the https://www.eclipse.org/aspectj/doc/next/progguide/index.html[AspectJ
|
||||
Programming Guide].
|
||||
=====
|
||||
|
||||
For this to work, the annotated types must be woven with the AspectJ weaver. You can
|
||||
either use a build-time Ant or Maven task to do this (see, for example, the
|
||||
https://www.eclipse.org/aspectj/doc/released/devguide/antTasks.html[AspectJ Development
|
||||
Environment Guide]) or load-time weaving (see xref:core/aop/using-aspectj.adoc#aop-aj-ltw[Load-time Weaving with AspectJ in the Spring Framework]). The
|
||||
`AnnotationBeanConfigurerAspect` itself needs to be configured by Spring (in order to obtain
|
||||
a reference to the bean factory that is to be used to configure new objects). If you
|
||||
use Java-based configuration, you can add `@EnableSpringConfigured` to any
|
||||
`@Configuration` class, as follows:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
@Configuration
|
||||
@EnableSpringConfigured
|
||||
public class AppConfig {
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
@Configuration
|
||||
@EnableSpringConfigured
|
||||
class AppConfig {
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
If you prefer XML based configuration, the Spring
|
||||
xref:core/appendix/xsd-schemas.adoc#context[`context` namespace]
|
||||
defines a convenient `context:spring-configured` element, which you can use as follows:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<context:spring-configured/>
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Instances of `@Configurable` objects created before the aspect has been configured
|
||||
result in a message being issued to the debug log and no configuration of the
|
||||
object taking place. An example might be a bean in the Spring configuration that creates
|
||||
domain objects when it is initialized by Spring. In this case, you can use the
|
||||
`depends-on` bean attribute to manually specify that the bean depends on the
|
||||
configuration aspect. The following example shows how to use the `depends-on` attribute:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<bean id="myService"
|
||||
class="com.xyz.service.MyService"
|
||||
depends-on="org.springframework.beans.factory.aspectj.AnnotationBeanConfigurerAspect">
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- ... -->
|
||||
|
||||
</bean>
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
NOTE: Do not activate `@Configurable` processing through the bean configurer aspect unless you
|
||||
really mean to rely on its semantics at runtime. In particular, make sure that you do
|
||||
not use `@Configurable` on bean classes that are registered as regular Spring beans
|
||||
with the container. Doing so results in double initialization, once through the
|
||||
container and once through the aspect.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[aop-configurable-testing]]
|
||||
=== Unit Testing `@Configurable` Objects
|
||||
|
||||
One of the goals of the `@Configurable` support is to enable independent unit testing
|
||||
of domain objects without the difficulties associated with hard-coded lookups.
|
||||
If `@Configurable` types have not been woven by AspectJ, the annotation has no affect
|
||||
during unit testing. You can set mock or stub property references in the object under
|
||||
test and proceed as normal. If `@Configurable` types have been woven by AspectJ,
|
||||
you can still unit test outside of the container as normal, but you see a warning
|
||||
message each time that you construct a `@Configurable` object indicating that it has
|
||||
not been configured by Spring.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[aop-configurable-container]]
|
||||
=== Working with Multiple Application Contexts
|
||||
|
||||
The `AnnotationBeanConfigurerAspect` that is used to implement the `@Configurable` support
|
||||
is an AspectJ singleton aspect. The scope of a singleton aspect is the same as the scope
|
||||
of `static` members: There is one aspect instance per `ClassLoader` that defines the type.
|
||||
This means that, if you define multiple application contexts within the same `ClassLoader`
|
||||
hierarchy, you need to consider where to define the `@EnableSpringConfigured` bean and
|
||||
where to place `spring-aspects.jar` on the classpath.
|
||||
|
||||
Consider a typical Spring web application configuration that has a shared parent application
|
||||
context that defines common business services, everything needed to support those services,
|
||||
and one child application context for each servlet (which contains definitions particular
|
||||
to that servlet). All of these contexts co-exist within the same `ClassLoader` hierarchy,
|
||||
and so the `AnnotationBeanConfigurerAspect` can hold a reference to only one of them.
|
||||
In this case, we recommend defining the `@EnableSpringConfigured` bean in the shared
|
||||
(parent) application context. This defines the services that you are likely to want to
|
||||
inject into domain objects. A consequence is that you cannot configure domain objects
|
||||
with references to beans defined in the child (servlet-specific) contexts by using the
|
||||
@Configurable mechanism (which is probably not something you want to do anyway).
|
||||
|
||||
When deploying multiple web applications within the same container, ensure that each
|
||||
web application loads the types in `spring-aspects.jar` by using its own `ClassLoader`
|
||||
(for example, by placing `spring-aspects.jar` in `WEB-INF/lib`). If `spring-aspects.jar`
|
||||
is added only to the container-wide classpath (and hence loaded by the shared parent
|
||||
`ClassLoader`), all web applications share the same aspect instance (which is probably
|
||||
not what you want).
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[aop-ajlib-other]]
|
||||
== Other Spring aspects for AspectJ
|
||||
|
||||
In addition to the `@Configurable` aspect, `spring-aspects.jar` contains an AspectJ
|
||||
aspect that you can use to drive Spring's transaction management for types and methods
|
||||
annotated with the `@Transactional` annotation. This is primarily intended for users who
|
||||
want to use the Spring Framework's transaction support outside of the Spring container.
|
||||
|
||||
The aspect that interprets `@Transactional` annotations is the
|
||||
`AnnotationTransactionAspect`. When you use this aspect, you must annotate the
|
||||
implementation class (or methods within that class or both), not the interface (if
|
||||
any) that the class implements. AspectJ follows Java's rule that annotations on
|
||||
interfaces are not inherited.
|
||||
|
||||
A `@Transactional` annotation on a class specifies the default transaction semantics for
|
||||
the execution of any public operation in the class.
|
||||
|
||||
A `@Transactional` annotation on a method within the class overrides the default
|
||||
transaction semantics given by the class annotation (if present). Methods of any
|
||||
visibility may be annotated, including private methods. Annotating non-public methods
|
||||
directly is the only way to get transaction demarcation for the execution of such methods.
|
||||
|
||||
TIP: Since Spring Framework 4.2, `spring-aspects` provides a similar aspect that offers the
|
||||
exact same features for the standard `jakarta.transaction.Transactional` annotation. Check
|
||||
`JtaAnnotationTransactionAspect` for more details.
|
||||
|
||||
For AspectJ programmers who want to use the Spring configuration and transaction
|
||||
management support but do not want to (or cannot) use annotations, `spring-aspects.jar`
|
||||
also contains `abstract` aspects you can extend to provide your own pointcut
|
||||
definitions. See the sources for the `AbstractBeanConfigurerAspect` and
|
||||
`AbstractTransactionAspect` aspects for more information. As an example, the following
|
||||
excerpt shows how you could write an aspect to configure all instances of objects
|
||||
defined in the domain model by using prototype bean definitions that match the
|
||||
fully qualified class names:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
public aspect DomainObjectConfiguration extends AbstractBeanConfigurerAspect {
|
||||
|
||||
public DomainObjectConfiguration() {
|
||||
setBeanWiringInfoResolver(new ClassNameBeanWiringInfoResolver());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// the creation of a new bean (any object in the domain model)
|
||||
protected pointcut beanCreation(Object beanInstance) :
|
||||
initialization(new(..)) &&
|
||||
CommonPointcuts.inDomainModel() &&
|
||||
this(beanInstance);
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[aop-aj-configure]]
|
||||
== Configuring AspectJ Aspects by Using Spring IoC
|
||||
|
||||
When you use AspectJ aspects with Spring applications, it is natural to both want and
|
||||
expect to be able to configure such aspects with Spring. The AspectJ runtime itself is
|
||||
responsible for aspect creation, and the means of configuring the AspectJ-created
|
||||
aspects through Spring depends on the AspectJ instantiation model (the `per-xxx` clause)
|
||||
used by the aspect.
|
||||
|
||||
The majority of AspectJ aspects are singleton aspects. Configuration of these
|
||||
aspects is easy. You can create a bean definition that references the aspect type as
|
||||
normal and include the `factory-method="aspectOf"` bean attribute. This ensures that
|
||||
Spring obtains the aspect instance by asking AspectJ for it rather than trying to create
|
||||
an instance itself. The following example shows how to use the `factory-method="aspectOf"` attribute:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<bean id="profiler" class="com.xyz.profiler.Profiler"
|
||||
factory-method="aspectOf"> <1>
|
||||
|
||||
<property name="profilingStrategy" ref="jamonProfilingStrategy"/>
|
||||
</bean>
|
||||
----
|
||||
<1> Note the `factory-method="aspectOf"` attribute
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Non-singleton aspects are harder to configure. However, it is possible to do so by
|
||||
creating prototype bean definitions and using the `@Configurable` support from
|
||||
`spring-aspects.jar` to configure the aspect instances once they have bean created by
|
||||
the AspectJ runtime.
|
||||
|
||||
If you have some @AspectJ aspects that you want to weave with AspectJ (for example,
|
||||
using load-time weaving for domain model types) and other @AspectJ aspects that you want
|
||||
to use with Spring AOP, and these aspects are all configured in Spring, you
|
||||
need to tell the Spring AOP @AspectJ auto-proxying support which exact subset of the
|
||||
@AspectJ aspects defined in the configuration should be used for auto-proxying. You can
|
||||
do this by using one or more `<include/>` elements inside the `<aop:aspectj-autoproxy/>`
|
||||
declaration. Each `<include/>` element specifies a name pattern, and only beans with
|
||||
names matched by at least one of the patterns are used for Spring AOP auto-proxy
|
||||
configuration. The following example shows how to use `<include/>` elements:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<aop:aspectj-autoproxy>
|
||||
<aop:include name="thisBean"/>
|
||||
<aop:include name="thatBean"/>
|
||||
</aop:aspectj-autoproxy>
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
NOTE: Do not be misled by the name of the `<aop:aspectj-autoproxy/>` element. Using it
|
||||
results in the creation of Spring AOP proxies. The @AspectJ style of aspect
|
||||
declaration is being used here, but the AspectJ runtime is not involved.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[aop-aj-ltw]]
|
||||
== Load-time Weaving with AspectJ in the Spring Framework
|
||||
|
||||
Load-time weaving (LTW) refers to the process of weaving AspectJ aspects into an
|
||||
application's class files as they are being loaded into the Java virtual machine (JVM).
|
||||
The focus of this section is on configuring and using LTW in the specific context of the
|
||||
Spring Framework. This section is not a general introduction to LTW. For full details on
|
||||
the specifics of LTW and configuring LTW with only AspectJ (with Spring not being
|
||||
involved at all), see the
|
||||
https://www.eclipse.org/aspectj/doc/released/devguide/ltw.html[LTW section of the AspectJ
|
||||
Development Environment Guide].
|
||||
|
||||
The value that the Spring Framework brings to AspectJ LTW is in enabling much
|
||||
finer-grained control over the weaving process. 'Vanilla' AspectJ LTW is effected by using
|
||||
a Java (5+) agent, which is switched on by specifying a VM argument when starting up a
|
||||
JVM. It is, thus, a JVM-wide setting, which may be fine in some situations but is often a
|
||||
little too coarse. Spring-enabled LTW lets you switch on LTW on a
|
||||
per-`ClassLoader` basis, which is more fine-grained and which can make more
|
||||
sense in a 'single-JVM-multiple-application' environment (such as is found in a typical
|
||||
application server environment).
|
||||
|
||||
Further, xref:core/aop/using-aspectj.adoc#aop-aj-ltw-environments[in certain environments], this support enables
|
||||
load-time weaving without making any modifications to the application server's launch
|
||||
script that is needed to add `-javaagent:path/to/aspectjweaver.jar` or (as we describe
|
||||
later in this section) `-javaagent:path/to/spring-instrument.jar`. Developers configure
|
||||
the application context to enable load-time weaving instead of relying on administrators
|
||||
who typically are in charge of the deployment configuration, such as the launch script.
|
||||
|
||||
Now that the sales pitch is over, let us first walk through a quick example of AspectJ
|
||||
LTW that uses Spring, followed by detailed specifics about elements introduced in the
|
||||
example. For a complete example, see the
|
||||
https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-petclinic[Petclinic sample application].
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[aop-aj-ltw-first-example]]
|
||||
=== A First Example
|
||||
|
||||
Assume that you are an application developer who has been tasked with diagnosing
|
||||
the cause of some performance problems in a system. Rather than break out a
|
||||
profiling tool, we are going to switch on a simple profiling aspect that lets us
|
||||
quickly get some performance metrics. We can then apply a finer-grained profiling
|
||||
tool to that specific area immediately afterwards.
|
||||
|
||||
NOTE: The example presented here uses XML configuration. You can also configure and
|
||||
use @AspectJ with xref:core/beans/java.adoc[Java configuration]. Specifically, you can use the
|
||||
`@EnableLoadTimeWeaving` annotation as an alternative to `<context:load-time-weaver/>`
|
||||
(see xref:core/aop/using-aspectj.adoc#aop-aj-ltw-spring[below] for details).
|
||||
|
||||
The following example shows the profiling aspect, which is not fancy.
|
||||
It is a time-based profiler that uses the @AspectJ-style of aspect declaration:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="primary",chomp="-packages"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
package com.xyz;
|
||||
|
||||
import org.aspectj.lang.ProceedingJoinPoint;
|
||||
import org.aspectj.lang.annotation.Aspect;
|
||||
import org.aspectj.lang.annotation.Around;
|
||||
import org.aspectj.lang.annotation.Pointcut;
|
||||
import org.springframework.util.StopWatch;
|
||||
import org.springframework.core.annotation.Order;
|
||||
|
||||
@Aspect
|
||||
public class ProfilingAspect {
|
||||
|
||||
@Around("methodsToBeProfiled()")
|
||||
public Object profile(ProceedingJoinPoint pjp) throws Throwable {
|
||||
StopWatch sw = new StopWatch(getClass().getSimpleName());
|
||||
try {
|
||||
sw.start(pjp.getSignature().getName());
|
||||
return pjp.proceed();
|
||||
} finally {
|
||||
sw.stop();
|
||||
System.out.println(sw.prettyPrint());
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Pointcut("execution(public * com.xyz..*.*(..))")
|
||||
public void methodsToBeProfiled(){}
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="secondary",chomp="-packages"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
package com.xyz
|
||||
|
||||
import org.aspectj.lang.ProceedingJoinPoint
|
||||
import org.aspectj.lang.annotation.Aspect
|
||||
import org.aspectj.lang.annotation.Around
|
||||
import org.aspectj.lang.annotation.Pointcut
|
||||
import org.springframework.util.StopWatch
|
||||
import org.springframework.core.annotation.Order
|
||||
|
||||
@Aspect
|
||||
class ProfilingAspect {
|
||||
|
||||
@Around("methodsToBeProfiled()")
|
||||
fun profile(pjp: ProceedingJoinPoint): Any? {
|
||||
val sw = StopWatch(javaClass.simpleName)
|
||||
try {
|
||||
sw.start(pjp.getSignature().getName())
|
||||
return pjp.proceed()
|
||||
} finally {
|
||||
sw.stop()
|
||||
println(sw.prettyPrint())
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Pointcut("execution(public * com.xyz..*.*(..))")
|
||||
fun methodsToBeProfiled() {
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
We also need to create an `META-INF/aop.xml` file, to inform the AspectJ weaver that
|
||||
we want to weave our `ProfilingAspect` into our classes. This file convention, namely
|
||||
the presence of a file (or files) on the Java classpath called `META-INF/aop.xml` is
|
||||
standard AspectJ. The following example shows the `aop.xml` file:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<!DOCTYPE aspectj PUBLIC "-//AspectJ//DTD//EN" "https://www.eclipse.org/aspectj/dtd/aspectj.dtd">
|
||||
<aspectj>
|
||||
|
||||
<weaver>
|
||||
<!-- only weave classes in our application-specific packages -->
|
||||
<include within="com.xyz.*"/>
|
||||
</weaver>
|
||||
|
||||
<aspects>
|
||||
<!-- weave in just this aspect -->
|
||||
<aspect name="com.xyz.ProfilingAspect"/>
|
||||
</aspects>
|
||||
|
||||
</aspectj>
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Now we can move on to the Spring-specific portion of the configuration. We need
|
||||
to configure a `LoadTimeWeaver` (explained later). This load-time weaver is the
|
||||
essential component responsible for weaving the aspect configuration in one or
|
||||
more `META-INF/aop.xml` files into the classes in your application. The good
|
||||
thing is that it does not require a lot of configuration (there are some more
|
||||
options that you can specify, but these are detailed later), as can be seen in
|
||||
the following example:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
|
||||
<beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans"
|
||||
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
|
||||
xmlns:context="http://www.springframework.org/schema/context"
|
||||
xsi:schemaLocation="
|
||||
http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans
|
||||
https://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans.xsd
|
||||
http://www.springframework.org/schema/context
|
||||
https://www.springframework.org/schema/context/spring-context.xsd">
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- a service object; we will be profiling its methods -->
|
||||
<bean id="entitlementCalculationService"
|
||||
class="com.xyz.StubEntitlementCalculationService"/>
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- this switches on the load-time weaving -->
|
||||
<context:load-time-weaver/>
|
||||
</beans>
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Now that all the required artifacts (the aspect, the `META-INF/aop.xml`
|
||||
file, and the Spring configuration) are in place, we can create the following
|
||||
driver class with a `main(..)` method to demonstrate the LTW in action:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="primary",chomp="-packages"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
package com.xyz;
|
||||
|
||||
// imports
|
||||
|
||||
public class Main {
|
||||
|
||||
public static void main(String[] args) {
|
||||
ApplicationContext ctx = new ClassPathXmlApplicationContext("beans.xml");
|
||||
|
||||
EntitlementCalculationService service =
|
||||
ctx.getBean(EntitlementCalculationService.class);
|
||||
|
||||
// the profiling aspect is 'woven' around this method execution
|
||||
service.calculateEntitlement();
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="secondary",chomp="-packages"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
package com.xyz
|
||||
|
||||
// imports
|
||||
|
||||
fun main() {
|
||||
val ctx = ClassPathXmlApplicationContext("beans.xml")
|
||||
|
||||
val service = ctx.getBean(EntitlementCalculationService.class)
|
||||
|
||||
// the profiling aspect is 'woven' around this method execution
|
||||
service.calculateEntitlement()
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
We have one last thing to do. The introduction to this section did say that one could
|
||||
switch on LTW selectively on a per-`ClassLoader` basis with Spring, and this is true.
|
||||
However, for this example, we use a Java agent (supplied with Spring) to switch on LTW.
|
||||
We use the following command to run the `Main` class shown earlier:
|
||||
|
||||
[literal,subs="verbatim"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
java -javaagent:C:/projects/xyz/lib/spring-instrument.jar com.xyz.Main
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
The `-javaagent` is a flag for specifying and enabling
|
||||
https://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/api/java/lang/instrument/package-summary.html[agents
|
||||
to instrument programs that run on the JVM]. The Spring Framework ships with such an
|
||||
agent, the `InstrumentationSavingAgent`, which is packaged in the
|
||||
`spring-instrument.jar` that was supplied as the value of the `-javaagent` argument in
|
||||
the preceding example.
|
||||
|
||||
The output from the execution of the `Main` program looks something like the next example.
|
||||
(I have introduced a `Thread.sleep(..)` statement into the `calculateEntitlement()`
|
||||
implementation so that the profiler actually captures something other than 0
|
||||
milliseconds (the `01234` milliseconds is not an overhead introduced by the AOP).
|
||||
The following listing shows the output we got when we ran our profiler:
|
||||
|
||||
[literal,subs="verbatim"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
Calculating entitlement
|
||||
|
||||
StopWatch 'ProfilingAspect': running time (millis) = 1234
|
||||
------ ----- ----------------------------
|
||||
ms % Task name
|
||||
------ ----- ----------------------------
|
||||
01234 100% calculateEntitlement
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Since this LTW is effected by using full-blown AspectJ, we are not limited only to advising
|
||||
Spring beans. The following slight variation on the `Main` program yields the same
|
||||
result:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="primary",chomp="-packages"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
package com.xyz;
|
||||
|
||||
// imports
|
||||
|
||||
public class Main {
|
||||
|
||||
public static void main(String[] args) {
|
||||
new ClassPathXmlApplicationContext("beans.xml");
|
||||
|
||||
EntitlementCalculationService service =
|
||||
new StubEntitlementCalculationService();
|
||||
|
||||
// the profiling aspect will be 'woven' around this method execution
|
||||
service.calculateEntitlement();
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="secondary",chomp="-packages"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
package com.xyz
|
||||
|
||||
// imports
|
||||
|
||||
fun main(args: Array<String>) {
|
||||
ClassPathXmlApplicationContext("beans.xml")
|
||||
|
||||
val service = StubEntitlementCalculationService()
|
||||
|
||||
// the profiling aspect will be 'woven' around this method execution
|
||||
service.calculateEntitlement()
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
Notice how, in the preceding program, we bootstrap the Spring container and
|
||||
then create a new instance of the `StubEntitlementCalculationService` totally outside
|
||||
the context of Spring. The profiling advice still gets woven in.
|
||||
|
||||
Admittedly, the example is simplistic. However, the basics of the LTW support in Spring
|
||||
have all been introduced in the earlier example, and the rest of this section explains
|
||||
the "why" behind each bit of configuration and usage in detail.
|
||||
|
||||
NOTE: The `ProfilingAspect` used in this example may be basic, but it is quite useful. It is a
|
||||
nice example of a development-time aspect that developers can use during development
|
||||
and then easily exclude from builds of the application being deployed
|
||||
into UAT or production.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[aop-aj-ltw-the-aspects]]
|
||||
=== Aspects
|
||||
|
||||
The aspects that you use in LTW have to be AspectJ aspects. You can write them in
|
||||
either the AspectJ language itself, or you can write your aspects in the @AspectJ-style.
|
||||
Your aspects are then both valid AspectJ and Spring AOP aspects.
|
||||
Furthermore, the compiled aspect classes need to be available on the classpath.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[aop-aj-ltw-aop_dot_xml]]
|
||||
=== 'META-INF/aop.xml'
|
||||
|
||||
The AspectJ LTW infrastructure is configured by using one or more `META-INF/aop.xml`
|
||||
files that are on the Java classpath (either directly or, more typically, in jar files).
|
||||
|
||||
The structure and contents of this file is detailed in the LTW part of the
|
||||
https://www.eclipse.org/aspectj/doc/released/devguide/ltw-configuration.html[AspectJ reference
|
||||
documentation]. Because the `aop.xml` file is 100% AspectJ, we do not describe it further here.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[aop-aj-ltw-libraries]]
|
||||
=== Required libraries (JARS)
|
||||
|
||||
At minimum, you need the following libraries to use the Spring Framework's support
|
||||
for AspectJ LTW:
|
||||
|
||||
* `spring-aop.jar`
|
||||
* `aspectjweaver.jar`
|
||||
|
||||
If you use the xref:core/aop/using-aspectj.adoc#aop-aj-ltw-environments-generic[Spring-provided agent to enable instrumentation]
|
||||
, you also need:
|
||||
|
||||
* `spring-instrument.jar`
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[aop-aj-ltw-spring]]
|
||||
=== Spring Configuration
|
||||
|
||||
The key component in Spring's LTW support is the `LoadTimeWeaver` interface (in the
|
||||
`org.springframework.instrument.classloading` package), and the numerous implementations
|
||||
of it that ship with the Spring distribution. A `LoadTimeWeaver` is responsible for
|
||||
adding one or more `java.lang.instrument.ClassFileTransformers` to a `ClassLoader` at
|
||||
runtime, which opens the door to all manner of interesting applications, one of which
|
||||
happens to be the LTW of aspects.
|
||||
|
||||
TIP: If you are unfamiliar with the idea of runtime class file transformation, see the
|
||||
javadoc API documentation for the `java.lang.instrument` package before continuing.
|
||||
While that documentation is not comprehensive, at least you can see the key interfaces
|
||||
and classes (for reference as you read through this section).
|
||||
|
||||
Configuring a `LoadTimeWeaver` for a particular `ApplicationContext` can be as easy as
|
||||
adding one line. (Note that you almost certainly need to use an
|
||||
`ApplicationContext` as your Spring container -- typically, a `BeanFactory` is not
|
||||
enough because the LTW support uses `BeanFactoryPostProcessors`.)
|
||||
|
||||
To enable the Spring Framework's LTW support, you need to configure a `LoadTimeWeaver`,
|
||||
which typically is done by using the `@EnableLoadTimeWeaving` annotation, as follows:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
@Configuration
|
||||
@EnableLoadTimeWeaving
|
||||
public class AppConfig {
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
@Configuration
|
||||
@EnableLoadTimeWeaving
|
||||
class AppConfig {
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
Alternatively, if you prefer XML-based configuration, use the
|
||||
`<context:load-time-weaver/>` element. Note that the element is defined in the
|
||||
`context` namespace. The following example shows how to use `<context:load-time-weaver/>`:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
|
||||
<beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans"
|
||||
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
|
||||
xmlns:context="http://www.springframework.org/schema/context"
|
||||
xsi:schemaLocation="
|
||||
http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans
|
||||
https://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans.xsd
|
||||
http://www.springframework.org/schema/context
|
||||
https://www.springframework.org/schema/context/spring-context.xsd">
|
||||
|
||||
<context:load-time-weaver/>
|
||||
|
||||
</beans>
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
The preceding configuration automatically defines and registers a number of LTW-specific
|
||||
infrastructure beans, such as a `LoadTimeWeaver` and an `AspectJWeavingEnabler`, for you.
|
||||
The default `LoadTimeWeaver` is the `DefaultContextLoadTimeWeaver` class, which attempts
|
||||
to decorate an automatically detected `LoadTimeWeaver`. The exact type of `LoadTimeWeaver`
|
||||
that is "automatically detected" is dependent upon your runtime environment.
|
||||
The following table summarizes various `LoadTimeWeaver` implementations:
|
||||
|
||||
[[aop-aj-ltw-spring-env-impls]]
|
||||
.DefaultContextLoadTimeWeaver LoadTimeWeavers
|
||||
|===
|
||||
| Runtime Environment| `LoadTimeWeaver` implementation
|
||||
|
||||
| Running in https://tomcat.apache.org/[Apache Tomcat]
|
||||
| `TomcatLoadTimeWeaver`
|
||||
|
||||
| Running in https://eclipse-ee4j.github.io/glassfish/[GlassFish] (limited to EAR deployments)
|
||||
| `GlassFishLoadTimeWeaver`
|
||||
|
||||
| Running in Red Hat's https://www.jboss.org/jbossas/[JBoss AS] or https://www.wildfly.org/[WildFly]
|
||||
| `JBossLoadTimeWeaver`
|
||||
|
||||
| JVM started with Spring `InstrumentationSavingAgent`
|
||||
(`java -javaagent:path/to/spring-instrument.jar`)
|
||||
| `InstrumentationLoadTimeWeaver`
|
||||
|
||||
| Fallback, expecting the underlying ClassLoader to follow common conventions
|
||||
(namely `addTransformer` and optionally a `getThrowawayClassLoader` method)
|
||||
| `ReflectiveLoadTimeWeaver`
|
||||
|===
|
||||
|
||||
Note that the table lists only the `LoadTimeWeavers` that are autodetected when you
|
||||
use the `DefaultContextLoadTimeWeaver`. You can specify exactly which `LoadTimeWeaver`
|
||||
implementation to use.
|
||||
|
||||
To specify a specific `LoadTimeWeaver` with Java configuration, implement the
|
||||
`LoadTimeWeavingConfigurer` interface and override the `getLoadTimeWeaver()` method.
|
||||
The following example specifies a `ReflectiveLoadTimeWeaver`:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
@Configuration
|
||||
@EnableLoadTimeWeaving
|
||||
public class AppConfig implements LoadTimeWeavingConfigurer {
|
||||
|
||||
@Override
|
||||
public LoadTimeWeaver getLoadTimeWeaver() {
|
||||
return new ReflectiveLoadTimeWeaver();
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
@Configuration
|
||||
@EnableLoadTimeWeaving
|
||||
class AppConfig : LoadTimeWeavingConfigurer {
|
||||
|
||||
override fun getLoadTimeWeaver(): LoadTimeWeaver {
|
||||
return ReflectiveLoadTimeWeaver()
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
If you use XML-based configuration, you can specify the fully qualified class name
|
||||
as the value of the `weaver-class` attribute on the `<context:load-time-weaver/>`
|
||||
element. Again, the following example specifies a `ReflectiveLoadTimeWeaver`:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
|
||||
<beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans"
|
||||
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
|
||||
xmlns:context="http://www.springframework.org/schema/context"
|
||||
xsi:schemaLocation="
|
||||
http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans
|
||||
https://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans.xsd
|
||||
http://www.springframework.org/schema/context
|
||||
https://www.springframework.org/schema/context/spring-context.xsd">
|
||||
|
||||
<context:load-time-weaver
|
||||
weaver-class="org.springframework.instrument.classloading.ReflectiveLoadTimeWeaver"/>
|
||||
|
||||
</beans>
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
The `LoadTimeWeaver` that is defined and registered by the configuration can be later
|
||||
retrieved from the Spring container by using the well known name, `loadTimeWeaver`.
|
||||
Remember that the `LoadTimeWeaver` exists only as a mechanism for Spring's LTW
|
||||
infrastructure to add one or more `ClassFileTransformers`. The actual
|
||||
`ClassFileTransformer` that does the LTW is the `ClassPreProcessorAgentAdapter` (from
|
||||
the `org.aspectj.weaver.loadtime` package) class. See the class-level javadoc of the
|
||||
`ClassPreProcessorAgentAdapter` class for further details, because the specifics of how
|
||||
the weaving is actually effected is beyond the scope of this document.
|
||||
|
||||
There is one final attribute of the configuration left to discuss: the `aspectjWeaving`
|
||||
attribute (or `aspectj-weaving` if you use XML). This attribute controls whether LTW
|
||||
is enabled or not. It accepts one of three possible values, with the default value being
|
||||
`autodetect` if the attribute is not present. The following table summarizes the three
|
||||
possible values:
|
||||
|
||||
[[aop-aj-ltw-ltw-tag-attrs]]
|
||||
.AspectJ weaving attribute values
|
||||
|===
|
||||
| Annotation Value| XML Value| Explanation
|
||||
|
||||
| `ENABLED`
|
||||
| `on`
|
||||
| AspectJ weaving is on, and aspects are woven at load-time as appropriate.
|
||||
|
||||
| `DISABLED`
|
||||
| `off`
|
||||
| LTW is off. No aspect is woven at load-time.
|
||||
|
||||
| `AUTODETECT`
|
||||
| `autodetect`
|
||||
| If the Spring LTW infrastructure can find at least one `META-INF/aop.xml` file,
|
||||
then AspectJ weaving is on. Otherwise, it is off. This is the default value.
|
||||
|===
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[aop-aj-ltw-environments]]
|
||||
=== Environment-specific Configuration
|
||||
|
||||
This last section contains any additional settings and configuration that you need
|
||||
when you use Spring's LTW support in environments such as application servers and web
|
||||
containers.
|
||||
|
||||
[[aop-aj-ltw-environments-tomcat-jboss-etc]]
|
||||
==== Tomcat, JBoss, WildFly
|
||||
|
||||
Tomcat and JBoss/WildFly provide a general app `ClassLoader` that is capable of local
|
||||
instrumentation. Spring's native LTW may leverage those ClassLoader implementations
|
||||
to provide AspectJ weaving.
|
||||
You can simply enable load-time weaving, as xref:core/aop/using-aspectj.adoc[described earlier].
|
||||
Specifically, you do not need to modify the JVM launch script to add
|
||||
`-javaagent:path/to/spring-instrument.jar`.
|
||||
|
||||
Note that on JBoss, you may need to disable the app server scanning to prevent it from
|
||||
loading the classes before the application actually starts. A quick workaround is to add
|
||||
to your artifact a file named `WEB-INF/jboss-scanning.xml` with the following content:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<scanning xmlns="urn:jboss:scanning:1.0"/>
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
[[aop-aj-ltw-environments-generic]]
|
||||
==== Generic Java Applications
|
||||
|
||||
When class instrumentation is required in environments that are not supported by
|
||||
specific `LoadTimeWeaver` implementations, a JVM agent is the general solution.
|
||||
For such cases, Spring provides `InstrumentationLoadTimeWeaver` which requires a
|
||||
Spring-specific (but very general) JVM agent, `spring-instrument.jar`, autodetected
|
||||
by common `@EnableLoadTimeWeaving` and `<context:load-time-weaver/>` setups.
|
||||
|
||||
To use it, you must start the virtual machine with the Spring agent by supplying
|
||||
the following JVM options:
|
||||
|
||||
[literal]
|
||||
[subs="verbatim"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
-javaagent:/path/to/spring-instrument.jar
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Note that this requires modification of the JVM launch script, which may prevent you
|
||||
from using this in application server environments (depending on your server and your
|
||||
operation policies). That said, for one-app-per-JVM deployments such as standalone
|
||||
Spring Boot applications, you typically control the entire JVM setup in any case.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,7 +0,0 @@
|
||||
[[appendix]]
|
||||
= Appendix
|
||||
:page-section-summary-toc: 1
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,57 +0,0 @@
|
||||
[[application-startup-steps]]
|
||||
= Application Startup Steps
|
||||
|
||||
This part of the appendix lists the existing `StartupSteps` that the core container is instrumented with.
|
||||
|
||||
WARNING: The name and detailed information about each startup step is not part of the public contract and
|
||||
is subject to change; this is considered as an implementation detail of the core container and will follow
|
||||
its behavior changes.
|
||||
|
||||
.Application startup steps defined in the core container
|
||||
|===
|
||||
| Name| Description| Tags
|
||||
|
||||
| `spring.beans.instantiate`
|
||||
| Instantiation of a bean and its dependencies.
|
||||
| `beanName` the name of the bean, `beanType` the type required at the injection point.
|
||||
|
||||
| `spring.beans.smart-initialize`
|
||||
| Initialization of `SmartInitializingSingleton` beans.
|
||||
| `beanName` the name of the bean.
|
||||
|
||||
| `spring.context.annotated-bean-reader.create`
|
||||
| Creation of the `AnnotatedBeanDefinitionReader`.
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
||||
| `spring.context.base-packages.scan`
|
||||
| Scanning of base packages.
|
||||
| `packages` array of base packages for scanning.
|
||||
|
||||
| `spring.context.beans.post-process`
|
||||
| Beans post-processing phase.
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
||||
| `spring.context.bean-factory.post-process`
|
||||
| Invocation of the `BeanFactoryPostProcessor` beans.
|
||||
| `postProcessor` the current post-processor.
|
||||
|
||||
| `spring.context.beandef-registry.post-process`
|
||||
| Invocation of the `BeanDefinitionRegistryPostProcessor` beans.
|
||||
| `postProcessor` the current post-processor.
|
||||
|
||||
| `spring.context.component-classes.register`
|
||||
| Registration of component classes through `AnnotationConfigApplicationContext#register`.
|
||||
| `classes` array of given classes for registration.
|
||||
|
||||
| `spring.context.config-classes.enhance`
|
||||
| Enhancement of configuration classes with CGLIB proxies.
|
||||
| `classCount` count of enhanced classes.
|
||||
|
||||
| `spring.context.config-classes.parse`
|
||||
| Configuration classes parsing phase with the `ConfigurationClassPostProcessor`.
|
||||
| `classCount` count of processed classes.
|
||||
|
||||
| `spring.context.refresh`
|
||||
| Application context refresh phase.
|
||||
|
|
||||
|===
|
||||
@@ -1,672 +0,0 @@
|
||||
[[xsd-schemas]]
|
||||
= XML Schemas
|
||||
|
||||
This part of the appendix lists XML schemas related to the core container.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[xsd-schemas-util]]
|
||||
== The `util` Schema
|
||||
|
||||
As the name implies, the `util` tags deal with common, utility configuration
|
||||
issues, such as configuring collections, referencing constants, and so forth.
|
||||
To use the tags in the `util` schema, you need to have the following preamble at the top
|
||||
of your Spring XML configuration file (the text in the snippet references the
|
||||
correct schema so that the tags in the `util` namespace are available to you):
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
|
||||
<beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans"
|
||||
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
|
||||
xmlns:util="http://www.springframework.org/schema/util"
|
||||
xsi:schemaLocation="
|
||||
http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans https://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans.xsd
|
||||
http://www.springframework.org/schema/util https://www.springframework.org/schema/util/spring-util.xsd">
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- bean definitions here -->
|
||||
|
||||
</beans>
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[xsd-schemas-util-constant]]
|
||||
=== Using `<util:constant/>`
|
||||
|
||||
Consider the following bean definition:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<bean id="..." class="...">
|
||||
<property name="isolation">
|
||||
<bean id="java.sql.Connection.TRANSACTION_SERIALIZABLE"
|
||||
class="org.springframework.beans.factory.config.FieldRetrievingFactoryBean" />
|
||||
</property>
|
||||
</bean>
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
The preceding configuration uses a Spring `FactoryBean` implementation (the
|
||||
`FieldRetrievingFactoryBean`) to set the value of the `isolation` property on a bean
|
||||
to the value of the `java.sql.Connection.TRANSACTION_SERIALIZABLE` constant. This is
|
||||
all well and good, but it is verbose and (unnecessarily) exposes Spring's internal
|
||||
plumbing to the end user.
|
||||
|
||||
The following XML Schema-based version is more concise, clearly expresses the
|
||||
developer's intent ("`inject this constant value`"), and it reads better:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<bean id="..." class="...">
|
||||
<property name="isolation">
|
||||
<util:constant static-field="java.sql.Connection.TRANSACTION_SERIALIZABLE"/>
|
||||
</property>
|
||||
</bean>
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
[[xsd-schemas-util-frfb]]
|
||||
==== Setting a Bean Property or Constructor Argument from a Field Value
|
||||
|
||||
{api-spring-framework}/beans/factory/config/FieldRetrievingFactoryBean.html[`FieldRetrievingFactoryBean`]
|
||||
is a `FactoryBean` that retrieves a `static` or non-static field value. It is typically
|
||||
used for retrieving `public` `static` `final` constants, which may then be used to set a
|
||||
property value or constructor argument for another bean.
|
||||
|
||||
The following example shows how a `static` field is exposed, by using the
|
||||
{api-spring-framework}/beans/factory/config/FieldRetrievingFactoryBean.html#setStaticField(java.lang.String)[`staticField`]
|
||||
property:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<bean id="myField"
|
||||
class="org.springframework.beans.factory.config.FieldRetrievingFactoryBean">
|
||||
<property name="staticField" value="java.sql.Connection.TRANSACTION_SERIALIZABLE"/>
|
||||
</bean>
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
There is also a convenience usage form where the `static` field is specified as the bean
|
||||
name, as the following example shows:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<bean id="java.sql.Connection.TRANSACTION_SERIALIZABLE"
|
||||
class="org.springframework.beans.factory.config.FieldRetrievingFactoryBean"/>
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
This does mean that there is no longer any choice in what the bean `id` is (so any other
|
||||
bean that refers to it also has to use this longer name), but this form is very
|
||||
concise to define and very convenient to use as an inner bean since the `id` does not have
|
||||
to be specified for the bean reference, as the following example shows:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<bean id="..." class="...">
|
||||
<property name="isolation">
|
||||
<bean id="java.sql.Connection.TRANSACTION_SERIALIZABLE"
|
||||
class="org.springframework.beans.factory.config.FieldRetrievingFactoryBean" />
|
||||
</property>
|
||||
</bean>
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
You can also access a non-static (instance) field of another bean, as
|
||||
described in the API documentation for the
|
||||
{api-spring-framework}/beans/factory/config/FieldRetrievingFactoryBean.html[`FieldRetrievingFactoryBean`]
|
||||
class.
|
||||
|
||||
Injecting enumeration values into beans as either property or constructor arguments is
|
||||
easy to do in Spring. You do not actually have to do anything or know anything about
|
||||
the Spring internals (or even about classes such as the `FieldRetrievingFactoryBean`).
|
||||
The following example enumeration shows how easy injecting an enum value is:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="primary",chomp="-packages"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
package jakarta.persistence;
|
||||
|
||||
public enum PersistenceContextType {
|
||||
|
||||
TRANSACTION,
|
||||
EXTENDED
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="secondary",chomp="-packages"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
package jakarta.persistence
|
||||
|
||||
enum class PersistenceContextType {
|
||||
|
||||
TRANSACTION,
|
||||
EXTENDED
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
Now consider the following setter of type `PersistenceContextType` and the corresponding bean definition:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="primary",chomp="-packages"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
package example;
|
||||
|
||||
public class Client {
|
||||
|
||||
private PersistenceContextType persistenceContextType;
|
||||
|
||||
public void setPersistenceContextType(PersistenceContextType type) {
|
||||
this.persistenceContextType = type;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="secondary",chomp="-packages"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
package example
|
||||
|
||||
class Client {
|
||||
|
||||
lateinit var persistenceContextType: PersistenceContextType
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<bean class="example.Client">
|
||||
<property name="persistenceContextType" value="TRANSACTION"/>
|
||||
</bean>
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[xsd-schemas-util-property-path]]
|
||||
=== Using `<util:property-path/>`
|
||||
|
||||
Consider the following example:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<!-- target bean to be referenced by name -->
|
||||
<bean id="testBean" class="org.springframework.beans.TestBean" scope="prototype">
|
||||
<property name="age" value="10"/>
|
||||
<property name="spouse">
|
||||
<bean class="org.springframework.beans.TestBean">
|
||||
<property name="age" value="11"/>
|
||||
</bean>
|
||||
</property>
|
||||
</bean>
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- results in 10, which is the value of property 'age' of bean 'testBean' -->
|
||||
<bean id="testBean.age" class="org.springframework.beans.factory.config.PropertyPathFactoryBean"/>
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
The preceding configuration uses a Spring `FactoryBean` implementation (the
|
||||
`PropertyPathFactoryBean`) to create a bean (of type `int`) called `testBean.age` that
|
||||
has a value equal to the `age` property of the `testBean` bean.
|
||||
|
||||
Now consider the following example, which adds a `<util:property-path/>` element:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<!-- target bean to be referenced by name -->
|
||||
<bean id="testBean" class="org.springframework.beans.TestBean" scope="prototype">
|
||||
<property name="age" value="10"/>
|
||||
<property name="spouse">
|
||||
<bean class="org.springframework.beans.TestBean">
|
||||
<property name="age" value="11"/>
|
||||
</bean>
|
||||
</property>
|
||||
</bean>
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- results in 10, which is the value of property 'age' of bean 'testBean' -->
|
||||
<util:property-path id="name" path="testBean.age"/>
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
The value of the `path` attribute of the `<property-path/>` element follows the form of
|
||||
`beanName.beanProperty`. In this case, it picks up the `age` property of the bean named
|
||||
`testBean`. The value of that `age` property is `10`.
|
||||
|
||||
[[xsd-schemas-util-property-path-dependency]]
|
||||
==== Using `<util:property-path/>` to Set a Bean Property or Constructor Argument
|
||||
|
||||
`PropertyPathFactoryBean` is a `FactoryBean` that evaluates a property path on a given
|
||||
target object. The target object can be specified directly or by a bean name. You can then use this
|
||||
value in another bean definition as a property value or constructor
|
||||
argument.
|
||||
|
||||
The following example shows a path being used against another bean, by name:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<!-- target bean to be referenced by name -->
|
||||
<bean id="person" class="org.springframework.beans.TestBean" scope="prototype">
|
||||
<property name="age" value="10"/>
|
||||
<property name="spouse">
|
||||
<bean class="org.springframework.beans.TestBean">
|
||||
<property name="age" value="11"/>
|
||||
</bean>
|
||||
</property>
|
||||
</bean>
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- results in 11, which is the value of property 'spouse.age' of bean 'person' -->
|
||||
<bean id="theAge"
|
||||
class="org.springframework.beans.factory.config.PropertyPathFactoryBean">
|
||||
<property name="targetBeanName" value="person"/>
|
||||
<property name="propertyPath" value="spouse.age"/>
|
||||
</bean>
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
In the following example, a path is evaluated against an inner bean:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<!-- results in 12, which is the value of property 'age' of the inner bean -->
|
||||
<bean id="theAge"
|
||||
class="org.springframework.beans.factory.config.PropertyPathFactoryBean">
|
||||
<property name="targetObject">
|
||||
<bean class="org.springframework.beans.TestBean">
|
||||
<property name="age" value="12"/>
|
||||
</bean>
|
||||
</property>
|
||||
<property name="propertyPath" value="age"/>
|
||||
</bean>
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
There is also a shortcut form, where the bean name is the property path.
|
||||
The following example shows the shortcut form:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<!-- results in 10, which is the value of property 'age' of bean 'person' -->
|
||||
<bean id="person.age"
|
||||
class="org.springframework.beans.factory.config.PropertyPathFactoryBean"/>
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
This form does mean that there is no choice in the name of the bean. Any reference to it
|
||||
also has to use the same `id`, which is the path. If used as an inner
|
||||
bean, there is no need to refer to it at all, as the following example shows:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<bean id="..." class="...">
|
||||
<property name="age">
|
||||
<bean id="person.age"
|
||||
class="org.springframework.beans.factory.config.PropertyPathFactoryBean"/>
|
||||
</property>
|
||||
</bean>
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
You can specifically set the result type in the actual definition. This is not necessary
|
||||
for most use cases, but it can sometimes be useful. See the javadoc for more info on
|
||||
this feature.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[xsd-schemas-util-properties]]
|
||||
=== Using `<util:properties/>`
|
||||
|
||||
Consider the following example:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<!-- creates a java.util.Properties instance with values loaded from the supplied location -->
|
||||
<bean id="jdbcConfiguration" class="org.springframework.beans.factory.config.PropertiesFactoryBean">
|
||||
<property name="location" value="classpath:com/foo/jdbc-production.properties"/>
|
||||
</bean>
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
The preceding configuration uses a Spring `FactoryBean` implementation (the
|
||||
`PropertiesFactoryBean`) to instantiate a `java.util.Properties` instance with values
|
||||
loaded from the supplied xref:web/webflux-webclient/client-builder.adoc#webflux-client-builder-reactor-resources[`Resource`] location).
|
||||
|
||||
The following example uses a `util:properties` element to make a more concise representation:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<!-- creates a java.util.Properties instance with values loaded from the supplied location -->
|
||||
<util:properties id="jdbcConfiguration" location="classpath:com/foo/jdbc-production.properties"/>
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[xsd-schemas-util-list]]
|
||||
=== Using `<util:list/>`
|
||||
|
||||
Consider the following example:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<!-- creates a java.util.List instance with values loaded from the supplied 'sourceList' -->
|
||||
<bean id="emails" class="org.springframework.beans.factory.config.ListFactoryBean">
|
||||
<property name="sourceList">
|
||||
<list>
|
||||
<value>pechorin@hero.org</value>
|
||||
<value>raskolnikov@slums.org</value>
|
||||
<value>stavrogin@gov.org</value>
|
||||
<value>porfiry@gov.org</value>
|
||||
</list>
|
||||
</property>
|
||||
</bean>
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
The preceding configuration uses a Spring `FactoryBean` implementation (the
|
||||
`ListFactoryBean`) to create a `java.util.List` instance and initialize it with values taken
|
||||
from the supplied `sourceList`.
|
||||
|
||||
The following example uses a `<util:list/>` element to make a more concise representation:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<!-- creates a java.util.List instance with the supplied values -->
|
||||
<util:list id="emails">
|
||||
<value>pechorin@hero.org</value>
|
||||
<value>raskolnikov@slums.org</value>
|
||||
<value>stavrogin@gov.org</value>
|
||||
<value>porfiry@gov.org</value>
|
||||
</util:list>
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
You can also explicitly control the exact type of `List` that is instantiated and
|
||||
populated by using the `list-class` attribute on the `<util:list/>` element. For
|
||||
example, if we really need a `java.util.LinkedList` to be instantiated, we could use the
|
||||
following configuration:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<util:list id="emails" list-class="java.util.LinkedList">
|
||||
<value>jackshaftoe@vagabond.org</value>
|
||||
<value>eliza@thinkingmanscrumpet.org</value>
|
||||
<value>vanhoek@pirate.org</value>
|
||||
<value>d'Arcachon@nemesis.org</value>
|
||||
</util:list>
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
If no `list-class` attribute is supplied, the container chooses a `List` implementation.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[xsd-schemas-util-map]]
|
||||
=== Using `<util:map/>`
|
||||
|
||||
Consider the following example:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<!-- creates a java.util.Map instance with values loaded from the supplied 'sourceMap' -->
|
||||
<bean id="emails" class="org.springframework.beans.factory.config.MapFactoryBean">
|
||||
<property name="sourceMap">
|
||||
<map>
|
||||
<entry key="pechorin" value="pechorin@hero.org"/>
|
||||
<entry key="raskolnikov" value="raskolnikov@slums.org"/>
|
||||
<entry key="stavrogin" value="stavrogin@gov.org"/>
|
||||
<entry key="porfiry" value="porfiry@gov.org"/>
|
||||
</map>
|
||||
</property>
|
||||
</bean>
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
The preceding configuration uses a Spring `FactoryBean` implementation (the
|
||||
`MapFactoryBean`) to create a `java.util.Map` instance initialized with key-value pairs
|
||||
taken from the supplied `'sourceMap'`.
|
||||
|
||||
The following example uses a `<util:map/>` element to make a more concise representation:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<!-- creates a java.util.Map instance with the supplied key-value pairs -->
|
||||
<util:map id="emails">
|
||||
<entry key="pechorin" value="pechorin@hero.org"/>
|
||||
<entry key="raskolnikov" value="raskolnikov@slums.org"/>
|
||||
<entry key="stavrogin" value="stavrogin@gov.org"/>
|
||||
<entry key="porfiry" value="porfiry@gov.org"/>
|
||||
</util:map>
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
You can also explicitly control the exact type of `Map` that is instantiated and
|
||||
populated by using the `'map-class'` attribute on the `<util:map/>` element. For
|
||||
example, if we really need a `java.util.TreeMap` to be instantiated, we could use the
|
||||
following configuration:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<util:map id="emails" map-class="java.util.TreeMap">
|
||||
<entry key="pechorin" value="pechorin@hero.org"/>
|
||||
<entry key="raskolnikov" value="raskolnikov@slums.org"/>
|
||||
<entry key="stavrogin" value="stavrogin@gov.org"/>
|
||||
<entry key="porfiry" value="porfiry@gov.org"/>
|
||||
</util:map>
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
If no `'map-class'` attribute is supplied, the container chooses a `Map` implementation.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[xsd-schemas-util-set]]
|
||||
=== Using `<util:set/>`
|
||||
|
||||
Consider the following example:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<!-- creates a java.util.Set instance with values loaded from the supplied 'sourceSet' -->
|
||||
<bean id="emails" class="org.springframework.beans.factory.config.SetFactoryBean">
|
||||
<property name="sourceSet">
|
||||
<set>
|
||||
<value>pechorin@hero.org</value>
|
||||
<value>raskolnikov@slums.org</value>
|
||||
<value>stavrogin@gov.org</value>
|
||||
<value>porfiry@gov.org</value>
|
||||
</set>
|
||||
</property>
|
||||
</bean>
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
The preceding configuration uses a Spring `FactoryBean` implementation (the
|
||||
`SetFactoryBean`) to create a `java.util.Set` instance initialized with values taken
|
||||
from the supplied `sourceSet`.
|
||||
|
||||
The following example uses a `<util:set/>` element to make a more concise representation:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<!-- creates a java.util.Set instance with the supplied values -->
|
||||
<util:set id="emails">
|
||||
<value>pechorin@hero.org</value>
|
||||
<value>raskolnikov@slums.org</value>
|
||||
<value>stavrogin@gov.org</value>
|
||||
<value>porfiry@gov.org</value>
|
||||
</util:set>
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
You can also explicitly control the exact type of `Set` that is instantiated and
|
||||
populated by using the `set-class` attribute on the `<util:set/>` element. For
|
||||
example, if we really need a `java.util.TreeSet` to be instantiated, we could use the
|
||||
following configuration:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<util:set id="emails" set-class="java.util.TreeSet">
|
||||
<value>pechorin@hero.org</value>
|
||||
<value>raskolnikov@slums.org</value>
|
||||
<value>stavrogin@gov.org</value>
|
||||
<value>porfiry@gov.org</value>
|
||||
</util:set>
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
If no `set-class` attribute is supplied, the container chooses a `Set` implementation.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[xsd-schemas-aop]]
|
||||
== The `aop` Schema
|
||||
|
||||
The `aop` tags deal with configuring all things AOP in Spring, including Spring's
|
||||
own proxy-based AOP framework and Spring's integration with the AspectJ AOP framework.
|
||||
These tags are comprehensively covered in the chapter entitled xref:core/aop.adoc[Aspect Oriented Programming with Spring]
|
||||
.
|
||||
|
||||
In the interest of completeness, to use the tags in the `aop` schema, you need to have
|
||||
the following preamble at the top of your Spring XML configuration file (the text in the
|
||||
snippet references the correct schema so that the tags in the `aop` namespace
|
||||
are available to you):
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
|
||||
<beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans"
|
||||
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
|
||||
xmlns:aop="http://www.springframework.org/schema/aop"
|
||||
xsi:schemaLocation="
|
||||
http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans https://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans.xsd
|
||||
http://www.springframework.org/schema/aop https://www.springframework.org/schema/aop/spring-aop.xsd">
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- bean definitions here -->
|
||||
|
||||
</beans>
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[xsd-schemas-context]]
|
||||
== The `context` Schema
|
||||
|
||||
The `context` tags deal with `ApplicationContext` configuration that relates to plumbing
|
||||
-- that is, not usually beans that are important to an end-user but rather beans that do
|
||||
a lot of the "`grunt`" work in Spring, such as `BeanfactoryPostProcessors`. The following
|
||||
snippet references the correct schema so that the elements in the `context` namespace are
|
||||
available to you:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
|
||||
<beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans"
|
||||
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
|
||||
xmlns:context="http://www.springframework.org/schema/context"
|
||||
xsi:schemaLocation="
|
||||
http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans https://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans.xsd
|
||||
http://www.springframework.org/schema/context https://www.springframework.org/schema/context/spring-context.xsd">
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- bean definitions here -->
|
||||
|
||||
</beans>
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[xsd-schemas-context-pphc]]
|
||||
=== Using `<property-placeholder/>`
|
||||
|
||||
This element activates the replacement of `${...}` placeholders, which are resolved against a
|
||||
specified properties file (as a xref:web/webflux-webclient/client-builder.adoc#webflux-client-builder-reactor-resources[Spring resource location]). This element
|
||||
is a convenience mechanism that sets up a xref:core/beans/factory-extension.adoc#beans-factory-placeholderconfigurer[`PropertySourcesPlaceholderConfigurer`]
|
||||
for you. If you need more control over the specific
|
||||
`PropertySourcesPlaceholderConfigurer` setup, you can explicitly define it as a bean yourself.
|
||||
|
||||
[WARNING]
|
||||
=====
|
||||
Only one such element should be defined for a given application with the properties
|
||||
that it needs. Several property placeholders can be configured as long as they have distinct
|
||||
placeholder syntax (`${...}`).
|
||||
|
||||
If you need to modularize the source of properties used for the replacement, you should
|
||||
not create multiple properties placeholders. Rather, each module should contribute a
|
||||
`PropertySource` to the `Environment`. Alternatively, you can create your own
|
||||
`PropertySourcesPlaceholderConfigurer` bean that gathers the properties to use.
|
||||
=====
|
||||
|
||||
[[xsd-schemas-context-ac]]
|
||||
=== Using `<annotation-config/>`
|
||||
|
||||
This element activates the Spring infrastructure to detect annotations in bean classes:
|
||||
|
||||
* Spring's xref:core/beans/basics.adoc#beans-factory-metadata[`@Configuration`] model
|
||||
* xref:core/beans/annotation-config.adoc[`@Autowired`/`@Inject`], `@Value`, and `@Lookup`
|
||||
* JSR-250's `@Resource`, `@PostConstruct`, and `@PreDestroy` (if available)
|
||||
* JAX-WS's `@WebServiceRef` and EJB 3's `@EJB` (if available)
|
||||
* JPA's `@PersistenceContext` and `@PersistenceUnit` (if available)
|
||||
* Spring's xref:core/beans/context-introduction.adoc#context-functionality-events-annotation[`@EventListener`]
|
||||
|
||||
Alternatively, you can choose to explicitly activate the individual `BeanPostProcessors`
|
||||
for those annotations.
|
||||
|
||||
NOTE: This element does not activate processing of Spring's
|
||||
xref:data-access/transaction/declarative/annotations.adoc[`@Transactional`] annotation;
|
||||
you can use the <<data-access.adoc#tx-decl-explained, `<tx:annotation-driven/>`>>
|
||||
element for that purpose. Similarly, Spring's
|
||||
xref:integration/cache/annotations.adoc[caching annotations] need to be explicitly
|
||||
xref:integration/cache/annotations.adoc#cache-annotation-enable[enabled] as well.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[xsd-schemas-context-component-scan]]
|
||||
=== Using `<component-scan/>`
|
||||
|
||||
This element is detailed in the section on xref:core/beans/annotation-config.adoc[annotation-based container configuration]
|
||||
.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[xsd-schemas-context-ltw]]
|
||||
=== Using `<load-time-weaver/>`
|
||||
|
||||
This element is detailed in the section on xref:core/aop/using-aspectj.adoc#aop-aj-ltw[load-time weaving with AspectJ in the Spring Framework]
|
||||
.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[xsd-schemas-context-sc]]
|
||||
=== Using `<spring-configured/>`
|
||||
|
||||
This element is detailed in the section on xref:core/aop/using-aspectj.adoc#aop-atconfigurable[using AspectJ to dependency inject domain objects with Spring]
|
||||
.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[xsd-schemas-context-mbe]]
|
||||
=== Using `<mbean-export/>`
|
||||
|
||||
This element is detailed in the section on xref:integration/jmx/naming.adoc#jmx-context-mbeanexport[configuring annotation-based MBean export]
|
||||
.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[xsd-schemas-beans]]
|
||||
== The Beans Schema
|
||||
|
||||
Last but not least, we have the elements in the `beans` schema. These elements
|
||||
have been in Spring since the very dawn of the framework. Examples of the various elements
|
||||
in the `beans` schema are not shown here because they are quite comprehensively covered
|
||||
in xref:core/beans/dependencies/factory-properties-detailed.adoc[dependencies and configuration in detail]
|
||||
(and, indeed, in that entire xref:web/webmvc-view/mvc-xslt.adoc#mvc-view-xslt-beandefs[chapter]).
|
||||
|
||||
Note that you can add zero or more key-value pairs to `<bean/>` XML definitions.
|
||||
What, if anything, is done with this extra metadata is totally up to your own custom
|
||||
logic (and so is typically only of use if you write your own custom elements as described
|
||||
in the appendix entitled xref:core/appendix/xml-custom.adoc[XML Schema Authoring]).
|
||||
|
||||
The following example shows the `<meta/>` element in the context of a surrounding `<bean/>`
|
||||
(note that, without any logic to interpret it, the metadata is effectively useless
|
||||
as it stands).
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
|
||||
<beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans"
|
||||
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
|
||||
xsi:schemaLocation="
|
||||
http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans https://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans.xsd">
|
||||
|
||||
<bean id="foo" class="x.y.Foo">
|
||||
<meta key="cacheName" value="foo"/> <1>
|
||||
<property name="name" value="Rick"/>
|
||||
</bean>
|
||||
|
||||
</beans>
|
||||
----
|
||||
<1> This is the example `meta` element
|
||||
|
||||
In the case of the preceding example, you could assume that there is some logic that consumes
|
||||
the bean definition and sets up some caching infrastructure that uses the supplied metadata.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,9 +0,0 @@
|
||||
[[beans]]
|
||||
= The IoC Container
|
||||
:page-section-summary-toc: 1
|
||||
|
||||
This chapter covers Spring's Inversion of Control (IoC) container.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,81 +0,0 @@
|
||||
[[beans-annotation-config]]
|
||||
= Annotation-based Container Configuration
|
||||
|
||||
.Are annotations better than XML for configuring Spring?
|
||||
****
|
||||
The introduction of annotation-based configuration raised the question of whether this
|
||||
approach is "`better`" than XML. The short answer is "`it depends.`" The long answer is
|
||||
that each approach has its pros and cons, and, usually, it is up to the developer to
|
||||
decide which strategy suits them better. Due to the way they are defined, annotations
|
||||
provide a lot of context in their declaration, leading to shorter and more concise
|
||||
configuration. However, XML excels at wiring up components without touching their source
|
||||
code or recompiling them. Some developers prefer having the wiring close to the source
|
||||
while others argue that annotated classes are no longer POJOs and, furthermore, that the
|
||||
configuration becomes decentralized and harder to control.
|
||||
|
||||
No matter the choice, Spring can accommodate both styles and even mix them together.
|
||||
It is worth pointing out that through its xref:core/beans/java.adoc[JavaConfig] option, Spring lets
|
||||
annotations be used in a non-invasive way, without touching the target components'
|
||||
source code and that, in terms of tooling, all configuration styles are supported by
|
||||
https://spring.io/tools[Spring Tools] for Eclipse, Visual Studio Code, and Theia.
|
||||
****
|
||||
|
||||
An alternative to XML setup is provided by annotation-based configuration, which relies
|
||||
on bytecode metadata for wiring up components instead of XML declarations. Instead of
|
||||
using XML to describe a bean wiring, the developer moves the configuration into the
|
||||
component class itself by using annotations on the relevant class, method, or field
|
||||
declaration. As mentioned in xref:core/beans/factory-extension.adoc#beans-factory-extension-bpp-examples-aabpp[Example: The `AutowiredAnnotationBeanPostProcessor`], using a
|
||||
`BeanPostProcessor` in conjunction with annotations is a common means of extending the
|
||||
Spring IoC container. For example, the xref:core/beans/annotation-config/autowired.adoc[`@Autowired`]
|
||||
annotation provides the same capabilities as described in xref:core/beans/dependencies/factory-autowire.adoc[Autowiring Collaborators] but
|
||||
with more fine-grained control and wider applicability. In addition, Spring provides
|
||||
support for JSR-250 annotations, such as `@PostConstruct` and `@PreDestroy`, as well as
|
||||
support for JSR-330 (Dependency Injection for Java) annotations contained in the
|
||||
`jakarta.inject` package such as `@Inject` and `@Named`. Details about those annotations
|
||||
can be found in the xref:core/beans/standard-annotations.adoc[relevant section].
|
||||
|
||||
[NOTE]
|
||||
====
|
||||
Annotation injection is performed before XML injection. Thus, the XML configuration
|
||||
overrides the annotations for properties wired through both approaches.
|
||||
====
|
||||
|
||||
As always, you can register the post-processors as individual bean definitions, but they
|
||||
can also be implicitly registered by including the following tag in an XML-based Spring
|
||||
configuration (notice the inclusion of the `context` namespace):
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
|
||||
<beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans"
|
||||
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
|
||||
xmlns:context="http://www.springframework.org/schema/context"
|
||||
xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans
|
||||
https://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans.xsd
|
||||
http://www.springframework.org/schema/context
|
||||
https://www.springframework.org/schema/context/spring-context.xsd">
|
||||
|
||||
<context:annotation-config/>
|
||||
|
||||
</beans>
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
The `<context:annotation-config/>` element implicitly registers the following post-processors:
|
||||
|
||||
* {api-spring-framework}/context/annotation/ConfigurationClassPostProcessor.html[`ConfigurationClassPostProcessor`]
|
||||
* {api-spring-framework}/beans/factory/annotation/AutowiredAnnotationBeanPostProcessor.html[`AutowiredAnnotationBeanPostProcessor`]
|
||||
* {api-spring-framework}/context/annotation/CommonAnnotationBeanPostProcessor.html[`CommonAnnotationBeanPostProcessor`]
|
||||
* {api-spring-framework}/orm/jpa/support/PersistenceAnnotationBeanPostProcessor.html[`PersistenceAnnotationBeanPostProcessor`]
|
||||
* {api-spring-framework}/context/event/EventListenerMethodProcessor.html[`EventListenerMethodProcessor`]
|
||||
|
||||
[NOTE]
|
||||
====
|
||||
`<context:annotation-config/>` only looks for annotations on beans in the same
|
||||
application context in which it is defined. This means that, if you put
|
||||
`<context:annotation-config/>` in a `WebApplicationContext` for a `DispatcherServlet`,
|
||||
it only checks for `@Autowired` beans in your controllers, and not your services. See
|
||||
xref:web/webmvc/mvc-servlet.adoc[The DispatcherServlet] for more information.
|
||||
====
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,114 +0,0 @@
|
||||
[[beans-autowired-annotation-primary]]
|
||||
= Fine-tuning Annotation-based Autowiring with `@Primary`
|
||||
|
||||
Because autowiring by type may lead to multiple candidates, it is often necessary to have
|
||||
more control over the selection process. One way to accomplish this is with Spring's
|
||||
`@Primary` annotation. `@Primary` indicates that a particular bean should be given
|
||||
preference when multiple beans are candidates to be autowired to a single-valued
|
||||
dependency. If exactly one primary bean exists among the candidates, it becomes the
|
||||
autowired value.
|
||||
|
||||
Consider the following configuration that defines `firstMovieCatalog` as the
|
||||
primary `MovieCatalog`:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
@Configuration
|
||||
public class MovieConfiguration {
|
||||
|
||||
@Bean
|
||||
@Primary
|
||||
public MovieCatalog firstMovieCatalog() { ... }
|
||||
|
||||
@Bean
|
||||
public MovieCatalog secondMovieCatalog() { ... }
|
||||
|
||||
// ...
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
@Configuration
|
||||
class MovieConfiguration {
|
||||
|
||||
@Bean
|
||||
@Primary
|
||||
fun firstMovieCatalog(): MovieCatalog { ... }
|
||||
|
||||
@Bean
|
||||
fun secondMovieCatalog(): MovieCatalog { ... }
|
||||
|
||||
// ...
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
With the preceding configuration, the following `MovieRecommender` is autowired with the
|
||||
`firstMovieCatalog`:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
public class MovieRecommender {
|
||||
|
||||
@Autowired
|
||||
private MovieCatalog movieCatalog;
|
||||
|
||||
// ...
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
class MovieRecommender {
|
||||
|
||||
@Autowired
|
||||
private lateinit var movieCatalog: MovieCatalog
|
||||
|
||||
// ...
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
The corresponding bean definitions follow:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
|
||||
<beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans"
|
||||
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
|
||||
xmlns:context="http://www.springframework.org/schema/context"
|
||||
xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans
|
||||
https://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans.xsd
|
||||
http://www.springframework.org/schema/context
|
||||
https://www.springframework.org/schema/context/spring-context.xsd">
|
||||
|
||||
<context:annotation-config/>
|
||||
|
||||
<bean class="example.SimpleMovieCatalog" primary="true">
|
||||
<!-- inject any dependencies required by this bean -->
|
||||
</bean>
|
||||
|
||||
<bean class="example.SimpleMovieCatalog">
|
||||
<!-- inject any dependencies required by this bean -->
|
||||
</bean>
|
||||
|
||||
<bean id="movieRecommender" class="example.MovieRecommender"/>
|
||||
|
||||
</beans>
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,585 +0,0 @@
|
||||
[[beans-autowired-annotation-qualifiers]]
|
||||
= Fine-tuning Annotation-based Autowiring with Qualifiers
|
||||
|
||||
`@Primary` is an effective way to use autowiring by type with several instances when one
|
||||
primary candidate can be determined. When you need more control over the selection process,
|
||||
you can use Spring's `@Qualifier` annotation. You can associate qualifier values
|
||||
with specific arguments, narrowing the set of type matches so that a specific bean is
|
||||
chosen for each argument. In the simplest case, this can be a plain descriptive value, as
|
||||
shown in the following example:
|
||||
|
||||
--
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
public class MovieRecommender {
|
||||
|
||||
@Autowired
|
||||
@Qualifier("main")
|
||||
private MovieCatalog movieCatalog;
|
||||
|
||||
// ...
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
class MovieRecommender {
|
||||
|
||||
@Autowired
|
||||
@Qualifier("main")
|
||||
private lateinit var movieCatalog: MovieCatalog
|
||||
|
||||
// ...
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
--
|
||||
|
||||
You can also specify the `@Qualifier` annotation on individual constructor arguments or
|
||||
method parameters, as shown in the following example:
|
||||
|
||||
--
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
public class MovieRecommender {
|
||||
|
||||
private final MovieCatalog movieCatalog;
|
||||
|
||||
private final CustomerPreferenceDao customerPreferenceDao;
|
||||
|
||||
@Autowired
|
||||
public void prepare(@Qualifier("main") MovieCatalog movieCatalog,
|
||||
CustomerPreferenceDao customerPreferenceDao) {
|
||||
this.movieCatalog = movieCatalog;
|
||||
this.customerPreferenceDao = customerPreferenceDao;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// ...
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
class MovieRecommender {
|
||||
|
||||
private lateinit var movieCatalog: MovieCatalog
|
||||
|
||||
private lateinit var customerPreferenceDao: CustomerPreferenceDao
|
||||
|
||||
@Autowired
|
||||
fun prepare(@Qualifier("main") movieCatalog: MovieCatalog,
|
||||
customerPreferenceDao: CustomerPreferenceDao) {
|
||||
this.movieCatalog = movieCatalog
|
||||
this.customerPreferenceDao = customerPreferenceDao
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// ...
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
--
|
||||
|
||||
The following example shows corresponding bean definitions.
|
||||
|
||||
--
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
|
||||
<beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans"
|
||||
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
|
||||
xmlns:context="http://www.springframework.org/schema/context"
|
||||
xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans
|
||||
https://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans.xsd
|
||||
http://www.springframework.org/schema/context
|
||||
https://www.springframework.org/schema/context/spring-context.xsd">
|
||||
|
||||
<context:annotation-config/>
|
||||
|
||||
<bean class="example.SimpleMovieCatalog">
|
||||
<qualifier value="main"/> <1>
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- inject any dependencies required by this bean -->
|
||||
</bean>
|
||||
|
||||
<bean class="example.SimpleMovieCatalog">
|
||||
<qualifier value="action"/> <2>
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- inject any dependencies required by this bean -->
|
||||
</bean>
|
||||
|
||||
<bean id="movieRecommender" class="example.MovieRecommender"/>
|
||||
|
||||
</beans>
|
||||
----
|
||||
<1> The bean with the `main` qualifier value is wired with the constructor argument that
|
||||
is qualified with the same value.
|
||||
<2> The bean with the `action` qualifier value is wired with the constructor argument that
|
||||
is qualified with the same value.
|
||||
--
|
||||
|
||||
For a fallback match, the bean name is considered a default qualifier value. Thus, you
|
||||
can define the bean with an `id` of `main` instead of the nested qualifier element, leading
|
||||
to the same matching result. However, although you can use this convention to refer to
|
||||
specific beans by name, `@Autowired` is fundamentally about type-driven injection with
|
||||
optional semantic qualifiers. This means that qualifier values, even with the bean name
|
||||
fallback, always have narrowing semantics within the set of type matches. They do not
|
||||
semantically express a reference to a unique bean `id`. Good qualifier values are `main`
|
||||
or `EMEA` or `persistent`, expressing characteristics of a specific component that are
|
||||
independent from the bean `id`, which may be auto-generated in case of an anonymous bean
|
||||
definition such as the one in the preceding example.
|
||||
|
||||
Qualifiers also apply to typed collections, as discussed earlier -- for example, to
|
||||
`Set<MovieCatalog>`. In this case, all matching beans, according to the declared
|
||||
qualifiers, are injected as a collection. This implies that qualifiers do not have to be
|
||||
unique. Rather, they constitute filtering criteria. For example, you can define
|
||||
multiple `MovieCatalog` beans with the same qualifier value "`action`", all of which are
|
||||
injected into a `Set<MovieCatalog>` annotated with `@Qualifier("action")`.
|
||||
|
||||
[TIP]
|
||||
====
|
||||
Letting qualifier values select against target bean names, within the type-matching
|
||||
candidates, does not require a `@Qualifier` annotation at the injection point.
|
||||
If there is no other resolution indicator (such as a qualifier or a primary marker),
|
||||
for a non-unique dependency situation, Spring matches the injection point name
|
||||
(that is, the field name or parameter name) against the target bean names and chooses the
|
||||
same-named candidate, if any.
|
||||
====
|
||||
|
||||
That said, if you intend to express annotation-driven injection by name, do not
|
||||
primarily use `@Autowired`, even if it is capable of selecting by bean name among
|
||||
type-matching candidates. Instead, use the JSR-250 `@Resource` annotation, which is
|
||||
semantically defined to identify a specific target component by its unique name, with
|
||||
the declared type being irrelevant for the matching process. `@Autowired` has rather
|
||||
different semantics: After selecting candidate beans by type, the specified `String`
|
||||
qualifier value is considered within those type-selected candidates only (for example,
|
||||
matching an `account` qualifier against beans marked with the same qualifier label).
|
||||
|
||||
For beans that are themselves defined as a collection, `Map`, or array type, `@Resource`
|
||||
is a fine solution, referring to the specific collection or array bean by unique name.
|
||||
That said, as of 4.3, you can match collection, `Map`, and array types through Spring's
|
||||
`@Autowired` type matching algorithm as well, as long as the element type information
|
||||
is preserved in `@Bean` return type signatures or collection inheritance hierarchies.
|
||||
In this case, you can use qualifier values to select among same-typed collections,
|
||||
as outlined in the previous paragraph.
|
||||
|
||||
As of 4.3, `@Autowired` also considers self references for injection (that is, references
|
||||
back to the bean that is currently injected). Note that self injection is a fallback.
|
||||
Regular dependencies on other components always have precedence. In that sense, self
|
||||
references do not participate in regular candidate selection and are therefore in
|
||||
particular never primary. On the contrary, they always end up as lowest precedence.
|
||||
In practice, you should use self references as a last resort only (for example, for
|
||||
calling other methods on the same instance through the bean's transactional proxy).
|
||||
Consider factoring out the affected methods to a separate delegate bean in such a scenario.
|
||||
Alternatively, you can use `@Resource`, which may obtain a proxy back to the current bean
|
||||
by its unique name.
|
||||
|
||||
[NOTE]
|
||||
====
|
||||
Trying to inject the results from `@Bean` methods on the same configuration class is
|
||||
effectively a self-reference scenario as well. Either lazily resolve such references
|
||||
in the method signature where it is actually needed (as opposed to an autowired field
|
||||
in the configuration class) or declare the affected `@Bean` methods as `static`,
|
||||
decoupling them from the containing configuration class instance and its lifecycle.
|
||||
Otherwise, such beans are only considered in the fallback phase, with matching beans
|
||||
on other configuration classes selected as primary candidates instead (if available).
|
||||
====
|
||||
|
||||
`@Autowired` applies to fields, constructors, and multi-argument methods, allowing for
|
||||
narrowing through qualifier annotations at the parameter level. In contrast, `@Resource`
|
||||
is supported only for fields and bean property setter methods with a single argument.
|
||||
As a consequence, you should stick with qualifiers if your injection target is a
|
||||
constructor or a multi-argument method.
|
||||
|
||||
You can create your own custom qualifier annotations. To do so, define an annotation and
|
||||
provide the `@Qualifier` annotation within your definition, as the following example shows:
|
||||
|
||||
--
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
@Target({ElementType.FIELD, ElementType.PARAMETER})
|
||||
@Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
|
||||
@Qualifier
|
||||
public @interface Genre {
|
||||
|
||||
String value();
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
@Target(AnnotationTarget.FIELD, AnnotationTarget.VALUE_PARAMETER)
|
||||
@Retention(AnnotationRetention.RUNTIME)
|
||||
@Qualifier
|
||||
annotation class Genre(val value: String)
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
--
|
||||
|
||||
Then you can provide the custom qualifier on autowired fields and parameters, as the
|
||||
following example shows:
|
||||
|
||||
--
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
public class MovieRecommender {
|
||||
|
||||
@Autowired
|
||||
@Genre("Action")
|
||||
private MovieCatalog actionCatalog;
|
||||
|
||||
private MovieCatalog comedyCatalog;
|
||||
|
||||
@Autowired
|
||||
public void setComedyCatalog(@Genre("Comedy") MovieCatalog comedyCatalog) {
|
||||
this.comedyCatalog = comedyCatalog;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// ...
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
class MovieRecommender {
|
||||
|
||||
@Autowired
|
||||
@Genre("Action")
|
||||
private lateinit var actionCatalog: MovieCatalog
|
||||
|
||||
private lateinit var comedyCatalog: MovieCatalog
|
||||
|
||||
@Autowired
|
||||
fun setComedyCatalog(@Genre("Comedy") comedyCatalog: MovieCatalog) {
|
||||
this.comedyCatalog = comedyCatalog
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// ...
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
--
|
||||
|
||||
Next, you can provide the information for the candidate bean definitions. You can add
|
||||
`<qualifier/>` tags as sub-elements of the `<bean/>` tag and then specify the `type` and
|
||||
`value` to match your custom qualifier annotations. The type is matched against the
|
||||
fully-qualified class name of the annotation. Alternately, as a convenience if no risk of
|
||||
conflicting names exists, you can use the short class name. The following example
|
||||
demonstrates both approaches:
|
||||
|
||||
--
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
|
||||
<beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans"
|
||||
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
|
||||
xmlns:context="http://www.springframework.org/schema/context"
|
||||
xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans
|
||||
https://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans.xsd
|
||||
http://www.springframework.org/schema/context
|
||||
https://www.springframework.org/schema/context/spring-context.xsd">
|
||||
|
||||
<context:annotation-config/>
|
||||
|
||||
<bean class="example.SimpleMovieCatalog">
|
||||
<qualifier type="Genre" value="Action"/>
|
||||
<!-- inject any dependencies required by this bean -->
|
||||
</bean>
|
||||
|
||||
<bean class="example.SimpleMovieCatalog">
|
||||
<qualifier type="example.Genre" value="Comedy"/>
|
||||
<!-- inject any dependencies required by this bean -->
|
||||
</bean>
|
||||
|
||||
<bean id="movieRecommender" class="example.MovieRecommender"/>
|
||||
|
||||
</beans>
|
||||
----
|
||||
--
|
||||
|
||||
In xref:core/beans/classpath-scanning.adoc[Classpath Scanning and Managed Components], you can see an annotation-based alternative to
|
||||
providing the qualifier metadata in XML. Specifically, see xref:core/beans/classpath-scanning.adoc#beans-scanning-qualifiers[Providing Qualifier Metadata with Annotations].
|
||||
|
||||
In some cases, using an annotation without a value may suffice. This can be
|
||||
useful when the annotation serves a more generic purpose and can be applied across
|
||||
several different types of dependencies. For example, you may provide an offline
|
||||
catalog that can be searched when no Internet connection is available. First, define
|
||||
the simple annotation, as the following example shows:
|
||||
|
||||
--
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
@Target({ElementType.FIELD, ElementType.PARAMETER})
|
||||
@Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
|
||||
@Qualifier
|
||||
public @interface Offline {
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
@Target(AnnotationTarget.FIELD, AnnotationTarget.VALUE_PARAMETER)
|
||||
@Retention(AnnotationRetention.RUNTIME)
|
||||
@Qualifier
|
||||
annotation class Offline
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
--
|
||||
|
||||
Then add the annotation to the field or property to be autowired, as shown in the
|
||||
following example:
|
||||
|
||||
--
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
public class MovieRecommender {
|
||||
|
||||
@Autowired
|
||||
@Offline // <1>
|
||||
private MovieCatalog offlineCatalog;
|
||||
|
||||
// ...
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
<1> This line adds the `@Offline` annotation.
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
class MovieRecommender {
|
||||
|
||||
@Autowired
|
||||
@Offline // <1>
|
||||
private lateinit var offlineCatalog: MovieCatalog
|
||||
|
||||
// ...
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
<1> This line adds the `@Offline` annotation.
|
||||
======
|
||||
--
|
||||
|
||||
Now the bean definition only needs a qualifier `type`, as shown in the following example:
|
||||
|
||||
--
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<bean class="example.SimpleMovieCatalog">
|
||||
<qualifier type="Offline"/> <1>
|
||||
<!-- inject any dependencies required by this bean -->
|
||||
</bean>
|
||||
----
|
||||
<1> This element specifies the qualifier.
|
||||
--
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
You can also define custom qualifier annotations that accept named attributes in
|
||||
addition to or instead of the simple `value` attribute. If multiple attribute values are
|
||||
then specified on a field or parameter to be autowired, a bean definition must match
|
||||
all such attribute values to be considered an autowire candidate. As an example,
|
||||
consider the following annotation definition:
|
||||
|
||||
--
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
@Target({ElementType.FIELD, ElementType.PARAMETER})
|
||||
@Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
|
||||
@Qualifier
|
||||
public @interface MovieQualifier {
|
||||
|
||||
String genre();
|
||||
|
||||
Format format();
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
@Target(AnnotationTarget.FIELD, AnnotationTarget.VALUE_PARAMETER)
|
||||
@Retention(AnnotationRetention.RUNTIME)
|
||||
@Qualifier
|
||||
annotation class MovieQualifier(val genre: String, val format: Format)
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
--
|
||||
|
||||
In this case `Format` is an enum, defined as follows:
|
||||
|
||||
--
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
public enum Format {
|
||||
VHS, DVD, BLURAY
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
enum class Format {
|
||||
VHS, DVD, BLURAY
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
--
|
||||
|
||||
The fields to be autowired are annotated with the custom qualifier and include values
|
||||
for both attributes: `genre` and `format`, as the following example shows:
|
||||
|
||||
--
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
public class MovieRecommender {
|
||||
|
||||
@Autowired
|
||||
@MovieQualifier(format=Format.VHS, genre="Action")
|
||||
private MovieCatalog actionVhsCatalog;
|
||||
|
||||
@Autowired
|
||||
@MovieQualifier(format=Format.VHS, genre="Comedy")
|
||||
private MovieCatalog comedyVhsCatalog;
|
||||
|
||||
@Autowired
|
||||
@MovieQualifier(format=Format.DVD, genre="Action")
|
||||
private MovieCatalog actionDvdCatalog;
|
||||
|
||||
@Autowired
|
||||
@MovieQualifier(format=Format.BLURAY, genre="Comedy")
|
||||
private MovieCatalog comedyBluRayCatalog;
|
||||
|
||||
// ...
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
class MovieRecommender {
|
||||
|
||||
@Autowired
|
||||
@MovieQualifier(format = Format.VHS, genre = "Action")
|
||||
private lateinit var actionVhsCatalog: MovieCatalog
|
||||
|
||||
@Autowired
|
||||
@MovieQualifier(format = Format.VHS, genre = "Comedy")
|
||||
private lateinit var comedyVhsCatalog: MovieCatalog
|
||||
|
||||
@Autowired
|
||||
@MovieQualifier(format = Format.DVD, genre = "Action")
|
||||
private lateinit var actionDvdCatalog: MovieCatalog
|
||||
|
||||
@Autowired
|
||||
@MovieQualifier(format = Format.BLURAY, genre = "Comedy")
|
||||
private lateinit var comedyBluRayCatalog: MovieCatalog
|
||||
|
||||
// ...
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
--
|
||||
|
||||
Finally, the bean definitions should contain matching qualifier values. This example
|
||||
also demonstrates that you can use bean meta attributes instead of the
|
||||
`<qualifier/>` elements. If available, the `<qualifier/>` element and its attributes take
|
||||
precedence, but the autowiring mechanism falls back on the values provided within the
|
||||
`<meta/>` tags if no such qualifier is present, as in the last two bean definitions in
|
||||
the following example:
|
||||
|
||||
--
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
|
||||
<beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans"
|
||||
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
|
||||
xmlns:context="http://www.springframework.org/schema/context"
|
||||
xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans
|
||||
https://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans.xsd
|
||||
http://www.springframework.org/schema/context
|
||||
https://www.springframework.org/schema/context/spring-context.xsd">
|
||||
|
||||
<context:annotation-config/>
|
||||
|
||||
<bean class="example.SimpleMovieCatalog">
|
||||
<qualifier type="MovieQualifier">
|
||||
<attribute key="format" value="VHS"/>
|
||||
<attribute key="genre" value="Action"/>
|
||||
</qualifier>
|
||||
<!-- inject any dependencies required by this bean -->
|
||||
</bean>
|
||||
|
||||
<bean class="example.SimpleMovieCatalog">
|
||||
<qualifier type="MovieQualifier">
|
||||
<attribute key="format" value="VHS"/>
|
||||
<attribute key="genre" value="Comedy"/>
|
||||
</qualifier>
|
||||
<!-- inject any dependencies required by this bean -->
|
||||
</bean>
|
||||
|
||||
<bean class="example.SimpleMovieCatalog">
|
||||
<meta key="format" value="DVD"/>
|
||||
<meta key="genre" value="Action"/>
|
||||
<!-- inject any dependencies required by this bean -->
|
||||
</bean>
|
||||
|
||||
<bean class="example.SimpleMovieCatalog">
|
||||
<meta key="format" value="BLURAY"/>
|
||||
<meta key="genre" value="Comedy"/>
|
||||
<!-- inject any dependencies required by this bean -->
|
||||
</bean>
|
||||
|
||||
</beans>
|
||||
----
|
||||
--
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,490 +0,0 @@
|
||||
[[beans-autowired-annotation]]
|
||||
= Using `@Autowired`
|
||||
|
||||
[NOTE]
|
||||
====
|
||||
JSR 330's `@Inject` annotation can be used in place of Spring's `@Autowired` annotation in the
|
||||
examples included in this section. See xref:core/beans/standard-annotations.adoc[here] for more details.
|
||||
====
|
||||
|
||||
You can apply the `@Autowired` annotation to constructors, as the following example shows:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
public class MovieRecommender {
|
||||
|
||||
private final CustomerPreferenceDao customerPreferenceDao;
|
||||
|
||||
@Autowired
|
||||
public MovieRecommender(CustomerPreferenceDao customerPreferenceDao) {
|
||||
this.customerPreferenceDao = customerPreferenceDao;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// ...
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
class MovieRecommender @Autowired constructor(
|
||||
private val customerPreferenceDao: CustomerPreferenceDao)
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
[NOTE]
|
||||
====
|
||||
As of Spring Framework 4.3, an `@Autowired` annotation on such a constructor is no longer
|
||||
necessary if the target bean defines only one constructor to begin with. However, if
|
||||
several constructors are available and there is no primary/default constructor, at least
|
||||
one of the constructors must be annotated with `@Autowired` in order to instruct the
|
||||
container which one to use. See the discussion on
|
||||
xref:core/beans/annotation-config/autowired.adoc#beans-autowired-annotation-constructor-resolution[constructor resolution] for details.
|
||||
====
|
||||
|
||||
You can also apply the `@Autowired` annotation to _traditional_ setter methods,
|
||||
as the following example shows:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
public class SimpleMovieLister {
|
||||
|
||||
private MovieFinder movieFinder;
|
||||
|
||||
@Autowired
|
||||
public void setMovieFinder(MovieFinder movieFinder) {
|
||||
this.movieFinder = movieFinder;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// ...
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
class SimpleMovieLister {
|
||||
|
||||
@set:Autowired
|
||||
lateinit var movieFinder: MovieFinder
|
||||
|
||||
// ...
|
||||
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
You can also apply the annotation to methods with arbitrary names and multiple
|
||||
arguments, as the following example shows:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
public class MovieRecommender {
|
||||
|
||||
private MovieCatalog movieCatalog;
|
||||
|
||||
private CustomerPreferenceDao customerPreferenceDao;
|
||||
|
||||
@Autowired
|
||||
public void prepare(MovieCatalog movieCatalog,
|
||||
CustomerPreferenceDao customerPreferenceDao) {
|
||||
this.movieCatalog = movieCatalog;
|
||||
this.customerPreferenceDao = customerPreferenceDao;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// ...
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
class MovieRecommender {
|
||||
|
||||
private lateinit var movieCatalog: MovieCatalog
|
||||
|
||||
private lateinit var customerPreferenceDao: CustomerPreferenceDao
|
||||
|
||||
@Autowired
|
||||
fun prepare(movieCatalog: MovieCatalog,
|
||||
customerPreferenceDao: CustomerPreferenceDao) {
|
||||
this.movieCatalog = movieCatalog
|
||||
this.customerPreferenceDao = customerPreferenceDao
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// ...
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
You can apply `@Autowired` to fields as well and even mix it with constructors, as the
|
||||
following example shows:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
public class MovieRecommender {
|
||||
|
||||
private final CustomerPreferenceDao customerPreferenceDao;
|
||||
|
||||
@Autowired
|
||||
private MovieCatalog movieCatalog;
|
||||
|
||||
@Autowired
|
||||
public MovieRecommender(CustomerPreferenceDao customerPreferenceDao) {
|
||||
this.customerPreferenceDao = customerPreferenceDao;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// ...
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
class MovieRecommender @Autowired constructor(
|
||||
private val customerPreferenceDao: CustomerPreferenceDao) {
|
||||
|
||||
@Autowired
|
||||
private lateinit var movieCatalog: MovieCatalog
|
||||
|
||||
// ...
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
[TIP]
|
||||
====
|
||||
Make sure that your target components (for example, `MovieCatalog` or `CustomerPreferenceDao`)
|
||||
are consistently declared by the type that you use for your `@Autowired`-annotated
|
||||
injection points. Otherwise, injection may fail due to a "no type match found" error at runtime.
|
||||
|
||||
For XML-defined beans or component classes found via classpath scanning, the container
|
||||
usually knows the concrete type up front. However, for `@Bean` factory methods, you need
|
||||
to make sure that the declared return type is sufficiently expressive. For components
|
||||
that implement several interfaces or for components potentially referred to by their
|
||||
implementation type, consider declaring the most specific return type on your factory
|
||||
method (at least as specific as required by the injection points referring to your bean).
|
||||
====
|
||||
|
||||
You can also instruct Spring to provide all beans of a particular type from the
|
||||
`ApplicationContext` by adding the `@Autowired` annotation to a field or method that
|
||||
expects an array of that type, as the following example shows:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
public class MovieRecommender {
|
||||
|
||||
@Autowired
|
||||
private MovieCatalog[] movieCatalogs;
|
||||
|
||||
// ...
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
class MovieRecommender {
|
||||
|
||||
@Autowired
|
||||
private lateinit var movieCatalogs: Array<MovieCatalog>
|
||||
|
||||
// ...
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
The same applies for typed collections, as the following example shows:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
public class MovieRecommender {
|
||||
|
||||
private Set<MovieCatalog> movieCatalogs;
|
||||
|
||||
@Autowired
|
||||
public void setMovieCatalogs(Set<MovieCatalog> movieCatalogs) {
|
||||
this.movieCatalogs = movieCatalogs;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// ...
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
class MovieRecommender {
|
||||
|
||||
@Autowired
|
||||
lateinit var movieCatalogs: Set<MovieCatalog>
|
||||
|
||||
// ...
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
[[beans-factory-ordered]]
|
||||
[TIP]
|
||||
====
|
||||
Your target beans can implement the `org.springframework.core.Ordered` interface or use
|
||||
the `@Order` or standard `@Priority` annotation if you want items in the array or list
|
||||
to be sorted in a specific order. Otherwise, their order follows the registration
|
||||
order of the corresponding target bean definitions in the container.
|
||||
|
||||
You can declare the `@Order` annotation at the target class level and on `@Bean` methods,
|
||||
potentially for individual bean definitions (in case of multiple definitions that
|
||||
use the same bean class). `@Order` values may influence priorities at injection points,
|
||||
but be aware that they do not influence singleton startup order, which is an
|
||||
orthogonal concern determined by dependency relationships and `@DependsOn` declarations.
|
||||
|
||||
Note that the standard `jakarta.annotation.Priority` annotation is not available at the
|
||||
`@Bean` level, since it cannot be declared on methods. Its semantics can be modeled
|
||||
through `@Order` values in combination with `@Primary` on a single bean for each type.
|
||||
====
|
||||
|
||||
Even typed `Map` instances can be autowired as long as the expected key type is `String`.
|
||||
The map values contain all beans of the expected type, and the keys contain the
|
||||
corresponding bean names, as the following example shows:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
public class MovieRecommender {
|
||||
|
||||
private Map<String, MovieCatalog> movieCatalogs;
|
||||
|
||||
@Autowired
|
||||
public void setMovieCatalogs(Map<String, MovieCatalog> movieCatalogs) {
|
||||
this.movieCatalogs = movieCatalogs;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// ...
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
class MovieRecommender {
|
||||
|
||||
@Autowired
|
||||
lateinit var movieCatalogs: Map<String, MovieCatalog>
|
||||
|
||||
// ...
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
By default, autowiring fails when no matching candidate beans are available for a given
|
||||
injection point. In the case of a declared array, collection, or map, at least one
|
||||
matching element is expected.
|
||||
|
||||
The default behavior is to treat annotated methods and fields as indicating required
|
||||
dependencies. You can change this behavior as demonstrated in the following example,
|
||||
enabling the framework to skip a non-satisfiable injection point through marking it as
|
||||
non-required (i.e., by setting the `required` attribute in `@Autowired` to `false`):
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
public class SimpleMovieLister {
|
||||
|
||||
private MovieFinder movieFinder;
|
||||
|
||||
@Autowired(required = false)
|
||||
public void setMovieFinder(MovieFinder movieFinder) {
|
||||
this.movieFinder = movieFinder;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// ...
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
class SimpleMovieLister {
|
||||
|
||||
@Autowired(required = false)
|
||||
var movieFinder: MovieFinder? = null
|
||||
|
||||
// ...
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
[NOTE]
|
||||
====
|
||||
A non-required method will not be called at all if its dependency (or one of its
|
||||
dependencies, in case of multiple arguments) is not available. A non-required field will
|
||||
not get populated at all in such cases, leaving its default value in place.
|
||||
|
||||
In other words, setting the `required` attribute to `false` indicates that the
|
||||
corresponding property is _optional_ for autowiring purposes, and the property will be
|
||||
ignored if it cannot be autowired. This allows properties to be assigned default values
|
||||
that can be optionally overridden via dependency injection.
|
||||
====
|
||||
|
||||
[[beans-autowired-annotation-constructor-resolution]]
|
||||
Injected constructor and factory method arguments are a special case since the `required`
|
||||
attribute in `@Autowired` has a somewhat different meaning due to Spring's constructor
|
||||
resolution algorithm that may potentially deal with multiple constructors. Constructor
|
||||
and factory method arguments are effectively required by default but with a few special
|
||||
rules in a single-constructor scenario, such as multi-element injection points (arrays,
|
||||
collections, maps) resolving to empty instances if no matching beans are available. This
|
||||
allows for a common implementation pattern where all dependencies can be declared in a
|
||||
unique multi-argument constructor — for example, declared as a single public constructor
|
||||
without an `@Autowired` annotation.
|
||||
|
||||
[NOTE]
|
||||
====
|
||||
Only one constructor of any given bean class may declare `@Autowired` with the `required`
|
||||
attribute set to `true`, indicating _the_ constructor to autowire when used as a Spring
|
||||
bean. As a consequence, if the `required` attribute is left at its default value `true`,
|
||||
only a single constructor may be annotated with `@Autowired`. If multiple constructors
|
||||
declare the annotation, they will all have to declare `required=false` in order to be
|
||||
considered as candidates for autowiring (analogous to `autowire=constructor` in XML).
|
||||
The constructor with the greatest number of dependencies that can be satisfied by matching
|
||||
beans in the Spring container will be chosen. If none of the candidates can be satisfied,
|
||||
then a primary/default constructor (if present) will be used. Similarly, if a class
|
||||
declares multiple constructors but none of them is annotated with `@Autowired`, then a
|
||||
primary/default constructor (if present) will be used. If a class only declares a single
|
||||
constructor to begin with, it will always be used, even if not annotated. Note that an
|
||||
annotated constructor does not have to be public.
|
||||
====
|
||||
|
||||
Alternatively, you can express the non-required nature of a particular dependency
|
||||
through Java 8's `java.util.Optional`, as the following example shows:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
public class SimpleMovieLister {
|
||||
|
||||
@Autowired
|
||||
public void setMovieFinder(Optional<MovieFinder> movieFinder) {
|
||||
...
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
As of Spring Framework 5.0, you can also use a `@Nullable` annotation (of any kind
|
||||
in any package -- for example, `javax.annotation.Nullable` from JSR-305) or just leverage
|
||||
Kotlin built-in null-safety support:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
public class SimpleMovieLister {
|
||||
|
||||
@Autowired
|
||||
public void setMovieFinder(@Nullable MovieFinder movieFinder) {
|
||||
...
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
class SimpleMovieLister {
|
||||
|
||||
@Autowired
|
||||
var movieFinder: MovieFinder? = null
|
||||
|
||||
// ...
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
You can also use `@Autowired` for interfaces that are well-known resolvable
|
||||
dependencies: `BeanFactory`, `ApplicationContext`, `Environment`, `ResourceLoader`,
|
||||
`ApplicationEventPublisher`, and `MessageSource`. These interfaces and their extended
|
||||
interfaces, such as `ConfigurableApplicationContext` or `ResourcePatternResolver`, are
|
||||
automatically resolved, with no special setup necessary. The following example autowires
|
||||
an `ApplicationContext` object:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
public class MovieRecommender {
|
||||
|
||||
@Autowired
|
||||
private ApplicationContext context;
|
||||
|
||||
public MovieRecommender() {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// ...
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
class MovieRecommender {
|
||||
|
||||
@Autowired
|
||||
lateinit var context: ApplicationContext
|
||||
|
||||
// ...
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
[NOTE]
|
||||
====
|
||||
The `@Autowired`, `@Inject`, `@Value`, and `@Resource` annotations are handled by Spring
|
||||
`BeanPostProcessor` implementations. This means that you cannot apply these annotations
|
||||
within your own `BeanPostProcessor` or `BeanFactoryPostProcessor` types (if any).
|
||||
These types must be 'wired up' explicitly by using XML or a Spring `@Bean` method.
|
||||
====
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,33 +0,0 @@
|
||||
[[beans-custom-autowire-configurer]]
|
||||
= Using `CustomAutowireConfigurer`
|
||||
|
||||
{api-spring-framework}/beans/factory/annotation/CustomAutowireConfigurer.html[`CustomAutowireConfigurer`]
|
||||
is a `BeanFactoryPostProcessor` that lets you register your own custom qualifier
|
||||
annotation types, even if they are not annotated with Spring's `@Qualifier` annotation.
|
||||
The following example shows how to use `CustomAutowireConfigurer`:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<bean id="customAutowireConfigurer"
|
||||
class="org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.CustomAutowireConfigurer">
|
||||
<property name="customQualifierTypes">
|
||||
<set>
|
||||
<value>example.CustomQualifier</value>
|
||||
</set>
|
||||
</property>
|
||||
</bean>
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
The `AutowireCandidateResolver` determines autowire candidates by:
|
||||
|
||||
* The `autowire-candidate` value of each bean definition
|
||||
* Any `default-autowire-candidates` patterns available on the `<beans/>` element
|
||||
* The presence of `@Qualifier` annotations and any custom annotations registered
|
||||
with the `CustomAutowireConfigurer`
|
||||
|
||||
When multiple beans qualify as autowire candidates, the determination of a "`primary`" is
|
||||
as follows: If exactly one bean definition among the candidates has a `primary`
|
||||
attribute set to `true`, it is selected.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,101 +0,0 @@
|
||||
[[beans-generics-as-qualifiers]]
|
||||
= Using Generics as Autowiring Qualifiers
|
||||
|
||||
In addition to the `@Qualifier` annotation, you can use Java generic types
|
||||
as an implicit form of qualification. For example, suppose you have the following
|
||||
configuration:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
@Configuration
|
||||
public class MyConfiguration {
|
||||
|
||||
@Bean
|
||||
public StringStore stringStore() {
|
||||
return new StringStore();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Bean
|
||||
public IntegerStore integerStore() {
|
||||
return new IntegerStore();
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
@Configuration
|
||||
class MyConfiguration {
|
||||
|
||||
@Bean
|
||||
fun stringStore() = StringStore()
|
||||
|
||||
@Bean
|
||||
fun integerStore() = IntegerStore()
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
Assuming that the preceding beans implement a generic interface, (that is, `Store<String>` and
|
||||
`Store<Integer>`), you can `@Autowire` the `Store` interface and the generic is
|
||||
used as a qualifier, as the following example shows:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
@Autowired
|
||||
private Store<String> s1; // <String> qualifier, injects the stringStore bean
|
||||
|
||||
@Autowired
|
||||
private Store<Integer> s2; // <Integer> qualifier, injects the integerStore bean
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
@Autowired
|
||||
private lateinit var s1: Store<String> // <String> qualifier, injects the stringStore bean
|
||||
|
||||
@Autowired
|
||||
private lateinit var s2: Store<Integer> // <Integer> qualifier, injects the integerStore bean
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
Generic qualifiers also apply when autowiring lists, `Map` instances and arrays. The
|
||||
following example autowires a generic `List`:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
// Inject all Store beans as long as they have an <Integer> generic
|
||||
// Store<String> beans will not appear in this list
|
||||
@Autowired
|
||||
private List<Store<Integer>> s;
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
// Inject all Store beans as long as they have an <Integer> generic
|
||||
// Store<String> beans will not appear in this list
|
||||
@Autowired
|
||||
private lateinit var s: List<Store<Integer>>
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,70 +0,0 @@
|
||||
[[beans-postconstruct-and-predestroy-annotations]]
|
||||
= Using `@PostConstruct` and `@PreDestroy`
|
||||
|
||||
The `CommonAnnotationBeanPostProcessor` not only recognizes the `@Resource` annotation
|
||||
but also the JSR-250 lifecycle annotations: `jakarta.annotation.PostConstruct` and
|
||||
`jakarta.annotation.PreDestroy`. Introduced in Spring 2.5, the support for these
|
||||
annotations offers an alternative to the lifecycle callback mechanism described in
|
||||
xref:core/beans/factory-nature.adoc#beans-factory-lifecycle-initializingbean[initialization callbacks] and
|
||||
xref:core/beans/factory-nature.adoc#beans-factory-lifecycle-disposablebean[destruction callbacks]. Provided that the
|
||||
`CommonAnnotationBeanPostProcessor` is registered within the Spring `ApplicationContext`,
|
||||
a method carrying one of these annotations is invoked at the same point in the lifecycle
|
||||
as the corresponding Spring lifecycle interface method or explicitly declared callback
|
||||
method. In the following example, the cache is pre-populated upon initialization and
|
||||
cleared upon destruction:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
public class CachingMovieLister {
|
||||
|
||||
@PostConstruct
|
||||
public void populateMovieCache() {
|
||||
// populates the movie cache upon initialization...
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@PreDestroy
|
||||
public void clearMovieCache() {
|
||||
// clears the movie cache upon destruction...
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
class CachingMovieLister {
|
||||
|
||||
@PostConstruct
|
||||
fun populateMovieCache() {
|
||||
// populates the movie cache upon initialization...
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@PreDestroy
|
||||
fun clearMovieCache() {
|
||||
// clears the movie cache upon destruction...
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
For details about the effects of combining various lifecycle mechanisms, see
|
||||
xref:core/beans/factory-nature.adoc#beans-factory-lifecycle-combined-effects[Combining Lifecycle Mechanisms].
|
||||
|
||||
[NOTE]
|
||||
====
|
||||
Like `@Resource`, the `@PostConstruct` and `@PreDestroy` annotation types were a part
|
||||
of the standard Java libraries from JDK 6 to 8. However, the entire `javax.annotation`
|
||||
package got separated from the core Java modules in JDK 9 and eventually removed in
|
||||
JDK 11. As of Jakarta EE 9, the package lives in `jakarta.annotation` now. If needed,
|
||||
the `jakarta.annotation-api` artifact needs to be obtained via Maven Central now,
|
||||
simply to be added to the application's classpath like any other library.
|
||||
====
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,145 +0,0 @@
|
||||
[[beans-resource-annotation]]
|
||||
= Injection with `@Resource`
|
||||
|
||||
Spring also supports injection by using the JSR-250 `@Resource` annotation
|
||||
(`jakarta.annotation.Resource`) on fields or bean property setter methods.
|
||||
This is a common pattern in Jakarta EE: for example, in JSF-managed beans and JAX-WS
|
||||
endpoints. Spring supports this pattern for Spring-managed objects as well.
|
||||
|
||||
`@Resource` takes a name attribute. By default, Spring interprets that value as
|
||||
the bean name to be injected. In other words, it follows by-name semantics,
|
||||
as demonstrated in the following example:
|
||||
|
||||
--
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
public class SimpleMovieLister {
|
||||
|
||||
private MovieFinder movieFinder;
|
||||
|
||||
@Resource(name="myMovieFinder") // <1>
|
||||
public void setMovieFinder(MovieFinder movieFinder) {
|
||||
this.movieFinder = movieFinder;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
<1> This line injects a `@Resource`.
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
class SimpleMovieLister {
|
||||
|
||||
@Resource(name="myMovieFinder") // <1>
|
||||
private lateinit var movieFinder:MovieFinder
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
<1> This line injects a `@Resource`.
|
||||
======
|
||||
--
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
If no name is explicitly specified, the default name is derived from the field name or
|
||||
setter method. In case of a field, it takes the field name. In case of a setter method,
|
||||
it takes the bean property name. The following example is going to have the bean
|
||||
named `movieFinder` injected into its setter method:
|
||||
|
||||
--
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
public class SimpleMovieLister {
|
||||
|
||||
private MovieFinder movieFinder;
|
||||
|
||||
@Resource
|
||||
public void setMovieFinder(MovieFinder movieFinder) {
|
||||
this.movieFinder = movieFinder;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
class SimpleMovieLister {
|
||||
|
||||
@set:Resource
|
||||
private lateinit var movieFinder: MovieFinder
|
||||
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
--
|
||||
|
||||
NOTE: The name provided with the annotation is resolved as a bean name by the
|
||||
`ApplicationContext` of which the `CommonAnnotationBeanPostProcessor` is aware.
|
||||
The names can be resolved through JNDI if you configure Spring's
|
||||
{api-spring-framework}/jndi/support/SimpleJndiBeanFactory.html[`SimpleJndiBeanFactory`]
|
||||
explicitly. However, we recommend that you rely on the default behavior and
|
||||
use Spring's JNDI lookup capabilities to preserve the level of indirection.
|
||||
|
||||
In the exclusive case of `@Resource` usage with no explicit name specified, and similar
|
||||
to `@Autowired`, `@Resource` finds a primary type match instead of a specific named bean
|
||||
and resolves well known resolvable dependencies: the `BeanFactory`,
|
||||
`ApplicationContext`, `ResourceLoader`, `ApplicationEventPublisher`, and `MessageSource`
|
||||
interfaces.
|
||||
|
||||
Thus, in the following example, the `customerPreferenceDao` field first looks for a bean
|
||||
named "customerPreferenceDao" and then falls back to a primary type match for the type
|
||||
`CustomerPreferenceDao`:
|
||||
|
||||
--
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
public class MovieRecommender {
|
||||
|
||||
@Resource
|
||||
private CustomerPreferenceDao customerPreferenceDao;
|
||||
|
||||
@Resource
|
||||
private ApplicationContext context; // <1>
|
||||
|
||||
public MovieRecommender() {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// ...
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
<1> The `context` field is injected based on the known resolvable dependency type:
|
||||
`ApplicationContext`.
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
class MovieRecommender {
|
||||
|
||||
@Resource
|
||||
private lateinit var customerPreferenceDao: CustomerPreferenceDao
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@Resource
|
||||
private lateinit var context: ApplicationContext // <1>
|
||||
|
||||
// ...
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
<1> The `context` field is injected based on the known resolvable dependency type:
|
||||
`ApplicationContext`.
|
||||
======
|
||||
--
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,242 +0,0 @@
|
||||
[[beans-value-annotations]]
|
||||
= Using `@Value`
|
||||
|
||||
`@Value` is typically used to inject externalized properties:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
@Component
|
||||
public class MovieRecommender {
|
||||
|
||||
private final String catalog;
|
||||
|
||||
public MovieRecommender(@Value("${catalog.name}") String catalog) {
|
||||
this.catalog = catalog;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
@Component
|
||||
class MovieRecommender(@Value("\${catalog.name}") private val catalog: String)
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
With the following configuration:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
@Configuration
|
||||
@PropertySource("classpath:application.properties")
|
||||
public class AppConfig { }
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
@Configuration
|
||||
@PropertySource("classpath:application.properties")
|
||||
class AppConfig
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
And the following `application.properties` file:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
catalog.name=MovieCatalog
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
In that case, the `catalog` parameter and field will be equal to the `MovieCatalog` value.
|
||||
|
||||
A default lenient embedded value resolver is provided by Spring. It will try to resolve the
|
||||
property value and if it cannot be resolved, the property name (for example `${catalog.name}`)
|
||||
will be injected as the value. If you want to maintain strict control over nonexistent
|
||||
values, you should declare a `PropertySourcesPlaceholderConfigurer` bean, as the following
|
||||
example shows:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
@Configuration
|
||||
public class AppConfig {
|
||||
|
||||
@Bean
|
||||
public static PropertySourcesPlaceholderConfigurer propertyPlaceholderConfigurer() {
|
||||
return new PropertySourcesPlaceholderConfigurer();
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
@Configuration
|
||||
class AppConfig {
|
||||
|
||||
@Bean
|
||||
fun propertyPlaceholderConfigurer() = PropertySourcesPlaceholderConfigurer()
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
NOTE: When configuring a `PropertySourcesPlaceholderConfigurer` using JavaConfig, the
|
||||
`@Bean` method must be `static`.
|
||||
|
||||
Using the above configuration ensures Spring initialization failure if any `${}`
|
||||
placeholder could not be resolved. It is also possible to use methods like
|
||||
`setPlaceholderPrefix`, `setPlaceholderSuffix`, or `setValueSeparator` to customize
|
||||
placeholders.
|
||||
|
||||
NOTE: Spring Boot configures by default a `PropertySourcesPlaceholderConfigurer` bean that
|
||||
will get properties from `application.properties` and `application.yml` files.
|
||||
|
||||
Built-in converter support provided by Spring allows simple type conversion (to `Integer`
|
||||
or `int` for example) to be automatically handled. Multiple comma-separated values can be
|
||||
automatically converted to `String` array without extra effort.
|
||||
|
||||
It is possible to provide a default value as following:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
@Component
|
||||
public class MovieRecommender {
|
||||
|
||||
private final String catalog;
|
||||
|
||||
public MovieRecommender(@Value("${catalog.name:defaultCatalog}") String catalog) {
|
||||
this.catalog = catalog;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
@Component
|
||||
class MovieRecommender(@Value("\${catalog.name:defaultCatalog}") private val catalog: String)
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
A Spring `BeanPostProcessor` uses a `ConversionService` behind the scenes to handle the
|
||||
process for converting the `String` value in `@Value` to the target type. If you want to
|
||||
provide conversion support for your own custom type, you can provide your own
|
||||
`ConversionService` bean instance as the following example shows:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
@Configuration
|
||||
public class AppConfig {
|
||||
|
||||
@Bean
|
||||
public ConversionService conversionService() {
|
||||
DefaultFormattingConversionService conversionService = new DefaultFormattingConversionService();
|
||||
conversionService.addConverter(new MyCustomConverter());
|
||||
return conversionService;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
@Configuration
|
||||
class AppConfig {
|
||||
|
||||
@Bean
|
||||
fun conversionService(): ConversionService {
|
||||
return DefaultFormattingConversionService().apply {
|
||||
addConverter(MyCustomConverter())
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
When `@Value` contains a xref:core/expressions.adoc[`SpEL` expression] the value will be dynamically
|
||||
computed at runtime as the following example shows:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
@Component
|
||||
public class MovieRecommender {
|
||||
|
||||
private final String catalog;
|
||||
|
||||
public MovieRecommender(@Value("#{systemProperties['user.catalog'] + 'Catalog' }") String catalog) {
|
||||
this.catalog = catalog;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
@Component
|
||||
class MovieRecommender(
|
||||
@Value("#{systemProperties['user.catalog'] + 'Catalog' }") private val catalog: String)
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
SpEL also enables the use of more complex data structures:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
@Component
|
||||
public class MovieRecommender {
|
||||
|
||||
private final Map<String, Integer> countOfMoviesPerCatalog;
|
||||
|
||||
public MovieRecommender(
|
||||
@Value("#{{'Thriller': 100, 'Comedy': 300}}") Map<String, Integer> countOfMoviesPerCatalog) {
|
||||
this.countOfMoviesPerCatalog = countOfMoviesPerCatalog;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
@Component
|
||||
class MovieRecommender(
|
||||
@Value("#{{'Thriller': 100, 'Comedy': 300}}") private val countOfMoviesPerCatalog: Map<String, Int>)
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,423 +0,0 @@
|
||||
[[beans-basics]]
|
||||
= Container Overview
|
||||
|
||||
The `org.springframework.context.ApplicationContext` interface represents the Spring IoC
|
||||
container and is responsible for instantiating, configuring, and assembling the
|
||||
beans. The container gets its instructions on what objects to
|
||||
instantiate, configure, and assemble by reading configuration metadata. The
|
||||
configuration metadata is represented in XML, Java annotations, or Java code. It lets
|
||||
you express the objects that compose your application and the rich interdependencies
|
||||
between those objects.
|
||||
|
||||
Several implementations of the `ApplicationContext` interface are supplied
|
||||
with Spring. In stand-alone applications, it is common to create an
|
||||
instance of
|
||||
{api-spring-framework}/context/support/ClassPathXmlApplicationContext.html[`ClassPathXmlApplicationContext`]
|
||||
or {api-spring-framework}/context/support/FileSystemXmlApplicationContext.html[`FileSystemXmlApplicationContext`].
|
||||
While XML has been the traditional format for defining configuration metadata, you can
|
||||
instruct the container to use Java annotations or code as the metadata format by
|
||||
providing a small amount of XML configuration to declaratively enable support for these
|
||||
additional metadata formats.
|
||||
|
||||
In most application scenarios, explicit user code is not required to instantiate one or
|
||||
more instances of a Spring IoC container. For example, in a web application scenario, a
|
||||
simple eight (or so) lines of boilerplate web descriptor XML in the `web.xml` file
|
||||
of the application typically suffices (see
|
||||
xref:core/beans/context-introduction.adoc#context-create[Convenient ApplicationContext Instantiation for Web Applications]).
|
||||
If you use the https://spring.io/tools[Spring Tools for Eclipse] (an Eclipse-powered
|
||||
development environment), you can easily create this boilerplate configuration with a
|
||||
few mouse clicks or keystrokes.
|
||||
|
||||
The following diagram shows a high-level view of how Spring works. Your application classes
|
||||
are combined with configuration metadata so that, after the `ApplicationContext` is
|
||||
created and initialized, you have a fully configured and executable system or
|
||||
application.
|
||||
|
||||
.The Spring IoC container
|
||||
image::container-magic.png[]
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[beans-factory-metadata]]
|
||||
== Configuration Metadata
|
||||
|
||||
As the preceding diagram shows, the Spring IoC container consumes a form of
|
||||
configuration metadata. This configuration metadata represents how you, as an
|
||||
application developer, tell the Spring container to instantiate, configure, and assemble
|
||||
the objects in your application.
|
||||
|
||||
Configuration metadata is traditionally supplied in a simple and intuitive XML format,
|
||||
which is what most of this chapter uses to convey key concepts and features of the
|
||||
Spring IoC container.
|
||||
|
||||
NOTE: XML-based metadata is not the only allowed form of configuration metadata.
|
||||
The Spring IoC container itself is totally decoupled from the format in which this
|
||||
configuration metadata is actually written. These days, many developers choose
|
||||
xref:core/beans/java.adoc[Java-based configuration] for their Spring applications.
|
||||
|
||||
For information about using other forms of metadata with the Spring container, see:
|
||||
|
||||
* xref:core/beans/annotation-config.adoc[Annotation-based configuration]: define beans using
|
||||
annotation-based configuration metadata.
|
||||
* xref:core/beans/java.adoc[Java-based configuration]: define beans external to your application
|
||||
classes by using Java rather than XML files. To use these features, see the
|
||||
{api-spring-framework}/context/annotation/Configuration.html[`@Configuration`],
|
||||
{api-spring-framework}/context/annotation/Bean.html[`@Bean`],
|
||||
{api-spring-framework}/context/annotation/Import.html[`@Import`],
|
||||
and {api-spring-framework}/context/annotation/DependsOn.html[`@DependsOn`] annotations.
|
||||
|
||||
Spring configuration consists of at least one and typically more than one bean
|
||||
definition that the container must manage. XML-based configuration metadata configures these
|
||||
beans as `<bean/>` elements inside a top-level `<beans/>` element. Java
|
||||
configuration typically uses `@Bean`-annotated methods within a `@Configuration` class.
|
||||
|
||||
These bean definitions correspond to the actual objects that make up your application.
|
||||
Typically, you define service layer objects, persistence layer objects such as
|
||||
repositories or data access objects (DAOs), presentation objects such as Web controllers,
|
||||
infrastructure objects such as a JPA `EntityManagerFactory`, JMS queues, and so forth.
|
||||
Typically, one does not configure fine-grained domain objects in the container, because
|
||||
it is usually the responsibility of repositories and business logic to create and load
|
||||
domain objects.
|
||||
|
||||
The following example shows the basic structure of XML-based configuration metadata:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
|
||||
<beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans"
|
||||
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
|
||||
xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans
|
||||
https://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans.xsd">
|
||||
|
||||
<bean id="..." class="..."> <1> <2>
|
||||
<!-- collaborators and configuration for this bean go here -->
|
||||
</bean>
|
||||
|
||||
<bean id="..." class="...">
|
||||
<!-- collaborators and configuration for this bean go here -->
|
||||
</bean>
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- more bean definitions go here -->
|
||||
|
||||
</beans>
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
<1> The `id` attribute is a string that identifies the individual bean definition.
|
||||
<2> The `class` attribute defines the type of the bean and uses the fully qualified
|
||||
class name.
|
||||
|
||||
The value of the `id` attribute can be used to refer to collaborating objects. The XML
|
||||
for referring to collaborating objects is not shown in this example. See
|
||||
xref:core/beans/dependencies.adoc[Dependencies] for more information.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[beans-factory-instantiation]]
|
||||
== Instantiating a Container
|
||||
|
||||
The location path or paths
|
||||
supplied to an `ApplicationContext` constructor are resource strings that let
|
||||
the container load configuration metadata from a variety of external resources, such
|
||||
as the local file system, the Java `CLASSPATH`, and so on.
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
ApplicationContext context = new ClassPathXmlApplicationContext("services.xml", "daos.xml");
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
val context = ClassPathXmlApplicationContext("services.xml", "daos.xml")
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
[NOTE]
|
||||
====
|
||||
After you learn about Spring's IoC container, you may want to know more about Spring's
|
||||
`Resource` abstraction (as described in
|
||||
xref:core/resources.adoc[Resources])
|
||||
which provides a convenient mechanism for reading an InputStream from locations defined
|
||||
in a URI syntax. In particular, `Resource` paths are used to construct applications contexts,
|
||||
as described in xref:core/resources.adoc#resources-app-ctx[Application Contexts and Resource Paths].
|
||||
====
|
||||
|
||||
The following example shows the service layer objects `(services.xml)` configuration file:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
|
||||
<beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans"
|
||||
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
|
||||
xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans
|
||||
https://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans.xsd">
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- services -->
|
||||
|
||||
<bean id="petStore" class="org.springframework.samples.jpetstore.services.PetStoreServiceImpl">
|
||||
<property name="accountDao" ref="accountDao"/>
|
||||
<property name="itemDao" ref="itemDao"/>
|
||||
<!-- additional collaborators and configuration for this bean go here -->
|
||||
</bean>
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- more bean definitions for services go here -->
|
||||
|
||||
</beans>
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
The following example shows the data access objects `daos.xml` file:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
|
||||
<beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans"
|
||||
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
|
||||
xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans
|
||||
https://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans.xsd">
|
||||
|
||||
<bean id="accountDao"
|
||||
class="org.springframework.samples.jpetstore.dao.jpa.JpaAccountDao">
|
||||
<!-- additional collaborators and configuration for this bean go here -->
|
||||
</bean>
|
||||
|
||||
<bean id="itemDao" class="org.springframework.samples.jpetstore.dao.jpa.JpaItemDao">
|
||||
<!-- additional collaborators and configuration for this bean go here -->
|
||||
</bean>
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- more bean definitions for data access objects go here -->
|
||||
|
||||
</beans>
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
In the preceding example, the service layer consists of the `PetStoreServiceImpl` class
|
||||
and two data access objects of the types `JpaAccountDao` and `JpaItemDao` (based
|
||||
on the JPA Object-Relational Mapping standard). The `property name` element refers to the
|
||||
name of the JavaBean property, and the `ref` element refers to the name of another bean
|
||||
definition. This linkage between `id` and `ref` elements expresses the dependency between
|
||||
collaborating objects. For details of configuring an object's dependencies, see
|
||||
xref:core/beans/dependencies.adoc[Dependencies].
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[beans-factory-xml-import]]
|
||||
=== Composing XML-based Configuration Metadata
|
||||
|
||||
It can be useful to have bean definitions span multiple XML files. Often, each individual
|
||||
XML configuration file represents a logical layer or module in your architecture.
|
||||
|
||||
You can use the application context constructor to load bean definitions from all these
|
||||
XML fragments. This constructor takes multiple `Resource` locations, as was shown in the
|
||||
xref:core/beans/basics.adoc#beans-factory-instantiation[previous section]. Alternatively,
|
||||
use one or more occurrences of the `<import/>` element to load bean definitions from
|
||||
another file or files. The following example shows how to do so:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<beans>
|
||||
<import resource="services.xml"/>
|
||||
<import resource="resources/messageSource.xml"/>
|
||||
<import resource="/resources/themeSource.xml"/>
|
||||
|
||||
<bean id="bean1" class="..."/>
|
||||
<bean id="bean2" class="..."/>
|
||||
</beans>
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
In the preceding example, external bean definitions are loaded from three files:
|
||||
`services.xml`, `messageSource.xml`, and `themeSource.xml`. All location paths are
|
||||
relative to the definition file doing the importing, so `services.xml` must be in the
|
||||
same directory or classpath location as the file doing the importing, while
|
||||
`messageSource.xml` and `themeSource.xml` must be in a `resources` location below the
|
||||
location of the importing file. As you can see, a leading slash is ignored. However, given
|
||||
that these paths are relative, it is better form not to use the slash at all. The
|
||||
contents of the files being imported, including the top level `<beans/>` element, must
|
||||
be valid XML bean definitions, according to the Spring Schema.
|
||||
|
||||
[NOTE]
|
||||
====
|
||||
It is possible, but not recommended, to reference files in parent directories using a
|
||||
relative "../" path. Doing so creates a dependency on a file that is outside the current
|
||||
application. In particular, this reference is not recommended for `classpath:` URLs (for
|
||||
example, `classpath:../services.xml`), where the runtime resolution process chooses the
|
||||
"`nearest`" classpath root and then looks into its parent directory. Classpath
|
||||
configuration changes may lead to the choice of a different, incorrect directory.
|
||||
|
||||
You can always use fully qualified resource locations instead of relative paths: for
|
||||
example, `file:C:/config/services.xml` or `classpath:/config/services.xml`. However, be
|
||||
aware that you are coupling your application's configuration to specific absolute
|
||||
locations. It is generally preferable to keep an indirection for such absolute
|
||||
locations -- for example, through "${...}" placeholders that are resolved against JVM
|
||||
system properties at runtime.
|
||||
====
|
||||
|
||||
The namespace itself provides the import directive feature. Further
|
||||
configuration features beyond plain bean definitions are available in a selection
|
||||
of XML namespaces provided by Spring -- for example, the `context` and `util` namespaces.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[groovy-bean-definition-dsl]]
|
||||
=== The Groovy Bean Definition DSL
|
||||
|
||||
As a further example for externalized configuration metadata, bean definitions can also
|
||||
be expressed in Spring's Groovy Bean Definition DSL, as known from the Grails framework.
|
||||
Typically, such configuration live in a ".groovy" file with the structure shown in the
|
||||
following example:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,groovy,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
beans {
|
||||
dataSource(BasicDataSource) {
|
||||
driverClassName = "org.hsqldb.jdbcDriver"
|
||||
url = "jdbc:hsqldb:mem:grailsDB"
|
||||
username = "sa"
|
||||
password = ""
|
||||
settings = [mynew:"setting"]
|
||||
}
|
||||
sessionFactory(SessionFactory) {
|
||||
dataSource = dataSource
|
||||
}
|
||||
myService(MyService) {
|
||||
nestedBean = { AnotherBean bean ->
|
||||
dataSource = dataSource
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
This configuration style is largely equivalent to XML bean definitions and even
|
||||
supports Spring's XML configuration namespaces. It also allows for importing XML
|
||||
bean definition files through an `importBeans` directive.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[beans-factory-client]]
|
||||
== Using the Container
|
||||
|
||||
The `ApplicationContext` is the interface for an advanced factory capable of maintaining
|
||||
a registry of different beans and their dependencies. By using the method
|
||||
`T getBean(String name, Class<T> requiredType)`, you can retrieve instances of your beans.
|
||||
|
||||
The `ApplicationContext` lets you read bean definitions and access them, as the following
|
||||
example shows:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
// create and configure beans
|
||||
ApplicationContext context = new ClassPathXmlApplicationContext("services.xml", "daos.xml");
|
||||
|
||||
// retrieve configured instance
|
||||
PetStoreService service = context.getBean("petStore", PetStoreService.class);
|
||||
|
||||
// use configured instance
|
||||
List<String> userList = service.getUsernameList();
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
import org.springframework.beans.factory.getBean
|
||||
|
||||
// create and configure beans
|
||||
val context = ClassPathXmlApplicationContext("services.xml", "daos.xml")
|
||||
|
||||
// retrieve configured instance
|
||||
val service = context.getBean<PetStoreService>("petStore")
|
||||
|
||||
// use configured instance
|
||||
var userList = service.getUsernameList()
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
With Groovy configuration, bootstrapping looks very similar. It has a different context
|
||||
implementation class which is Groovy-aware (but also understands XML bean definitions).
|
||||
The following example shows Groovy configuration:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
ApplicationContext context = new GenericGroovyApplicationContext("services.groovy", "daos.groovy");
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
val context = GenericGroovyApplicationContext("services.groovy", "daos.groovy")
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
The most flexible variant is `GenericApplicationContext` in combination with reader
|
||||
delegates -- for example, with `XmlBeanDefinitionReader` for XML files, as the following
|
||||
example shows:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
GenericApplicationContext context = new GenericApplicationContext();
|
||||
new XmlBeanDefinitionReader(context).loadBeanDefinitions("services.xml", "daos.xml");
|
||||
context.refresh();
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
val context = GenericApplicationContext()
|
||||
XmlBeanDefinitionReader(context).loadBeanDefinitions("services.xml", "daos.xml")
|
||||
context.refresh()
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
You can also use the `GroovyBeanDefinitionReader` for Groovy files, as the following
|
||||
example shows:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
GenericApplicationContext context = new GenericApplicationContext();
|
||||
new GroovyBeanDefinitionReader(context).loadBeanDefinitions("services.groovy", "daos.groovy");
|
||||
context.refresh();
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
val context = GenericApplicationContext()
|
||||
GroovyBeanDefinitionReader(context).loadBeanDefinitions("services.groovy", "daos.groovy")
|
||||
context.refresh()
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
You can mix and match such reader delegates on the same `ApplicationContext`,
|
||||
reading bean definitions from diverse configuration sources.
|
||||
|
||||
You can then use `getBean` to retrieve instances of your beans. The `ApplicationContext`
|
||||
interface has a few other methods for retrieving beans, but, ideally, your application
|
||||
code should never use them. Indeed, your application code should have no calls to the
|
||||
`getBean()` method at all and thus have no dependency on Spring APIs at all. For example,
|
||||
Spring's integration with web frameworks provides dependency injection for various web
|
||||
framework components such as controllers and JSF-managed beans, letting you declare
|
||||
a dependency on a specific bean through metadata (such as an autowiring annotation).
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,171 +0,0 @@
|
||||
[[beans-beanfactory]]
|
||||
= The `BeanFactory` API
|
||||
|
||||
The `BeanFactory` API provides the underlying basis for Spring's IoC functionality.
|
||||
Its specific contracts are mostly used in integration with other parts of Spring and
|
||||
related third-party frameworks, and its `DefaultListableBeanFactory` implementation
|
||||
is a key delegate within the higher-level `GenericApplicationContext` container.
|
||||
|
||||
`BeanFactory` and related interfaces (such as `BeanFactoryAware`, `InitializingBean`,
|
||||
`DisposableBean`) are important integration points for other framework components.
|
||||
By not requiring any annotations or even reflection, they allow for very efficient
|
||||
interaction between the container and its components. Application-level beans may
|
||||
use the same callback interfaces but typically prefer declarative dependency
|
||||
injection instead, either through annotations or through programmatic configuration.
|
||||
|
||||
Note that the core `BeanFactory` API level and its `DefaultListableBeanFactory`
|
||||
implementation do not make assumptions about the configuration format or any
|
||||
component annotations to be used. All of these flavors come in through extensions
|
||||
(such as `XmlBeanDefinitionReader` and `AutowiredAnnotationBeanPostProcessor`) and
|
||||
operate on shared `BeanDefinition` objects as a core metadata representation.
|
||||
This is the essence of what makes Spring's container so flexible and extensible.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[context-introduction-ctx-vs-beanfactory]]
|
||||
== `BeanFactory` or `ApplicationContext`?
|
||||
|
||||
This section explains the differences between the `BeanFactory` and
|
||||
`ApplicationContext` container levels and the implications on bootstrapping.
|
||||
|
||||
You should use an `ApplicationContext` unless you have a good reason for not doing so, with
|
||||
`GenericApplicationContext` and its subclass `AnnotationConfigApplicationContext`
|
||||
as the common implementations for custom bootstrapping. These are the primary entry
|
||||
points to Spring's core container for all common purposes: loading of configuration
|
||||
files, triggering a classpath scan, programmatically registering bean definitions
|
||||
and annotated classes, and (as of 5.0) registering functional bean definitions.
|
||||
|
||||
Because an `ApplicationContext` includes all the functionality of a `BeanFactory`, it is
|
||||
generally recommended over a plain `BeanFactory`, except for scenarios where full
|
||||
control over bean processing is needed. Within an `ApplicationContext` (such as the
|
||||
`GenericApplicationContext` implementation), several kinds of beans are detected
|
||||
by convention (that is, by bean name or by bean type -- in particular, post-processors),
|
||||
while a plain `DefaultListableBeanFactory` is agnostic about any special beans.
|
||||
|
||||
For many extended container features, such as annotation processing and AOP proxying,
|
||||
the xref:core/beans/factory-extension.adoc#beans-factory-extension-bpp[`BeanPostProcessor` extension point] is essential.
|
||||
If you use only a plain `DefaultListableBeanFactory`, such post-processors do not
|
||||
get detected and activated by default. This situation could be confusing, because
|
||||
nothing is actually wrong with your bean configuration. Rather, in such a scenario,
|
||||
the container needs to be fully bootstrapped through additional setup.
|
||||
|
||||
The following table lists features provided by the `BeanFactory` and
|
||||
`ApplicationContext` interfaces and implementations.
|
||||
|
||||
[[context-introduction-ctx-vs-beanfactory-feature-matrix]]
|
||||
.Feature Matrix
|
||||
[cols="50%,25%,25%"]
|
||||
|===
|
||||
| Feature | `BeanFactory` | `ApplicationContext`
|
||||
|
||||
| Bean instantiation/wiring
|
||||
| Yes
|
||||
| Yes
|
||||
|
||||
| Integrated lifecycle management
|
||||
| No
|
||||
| Yes
|
||||
|
||||
| Automatic `BeanPostProcessor` registration
|
||||
| No
|
||||
| Yes
|
||||
|
||||
| Automatic `BeanFactoryPostProcessor` registration
|
||||
| No
|
||||
| Yes
|
||||
|
||||
| Convenient `MessageSource` access (for internationalization)
|
||||
| No
|
||||
| Yes
|
||||
|
||||
| Built-in `ApplicationEvent` publication mechanism
|
||||
| No
|
||||
| Yes
|
||||
|===
|
||||
|
||||
To explicitly register a bean post-processor with a `DefaultListableBeanFactory`,
|
||||
you need to programmatically call `addBeanPostProcessor`, as the following example shows:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
DefaultListableBeanFactory factory = new DefaultListableBeanFactory();
|
||||
// populate the factory with bean definitions
|
||||
|
||||
// now register any needed BeanPostProcessor instances
|
||||
factory.addBeanPostProcessor(new AutowiredAnnotationBeanPostProcessor());
|
||||
factory.addBeanPostProcessor(new MyBeanPostProcessor());
|
||||
|
||||
// now start using the factory
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
val factory = DefaultListableBeanFactory()
|
||||
// populate the factory with bean definitions
|
||||
|
||||
// now register any needed BeanPostProcessor instances
|
||||
factory.addBeanPostProcessor(AutowiredAnnotationBeanPostProcessor())
|
||||
factory.addBeanPostProcessor(MyBeanPostProcessor())
|
||||
|
||||
// now start using the factory
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
To apply a `BeanFactoryPostProcessor` to a plain `DefaultListableBeanFactory`,
|
||||
you need to call its `postProcessBeanFactory` method, as the following example shows:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
Java::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="primary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
DefaultListableBeanFactory factory = new DefaultListableBeanFactory();
|
||||
XmlBeanDefinitionReader reader = new XmlBeanDefinitionReader(factory);
|
||||
reader.loadBeanDefinitions(new FileSystemResource("beans.xml"));
|
||||
|
||||
// bring in some property values from a Properties file
|
||||
PropertySourcesPlaceholderConfigurer cfg = new PropertySourcesPlaceholderConfigurer();
|
||||
cfg.setLocation(new FileSystemResource("jdbc.properties"));
|
||||
|
||||
// now actually do the replacement
|
||||
cfg.postProcessBeanFactory(factory);
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Kotlin::
|
||||
+
|
||||
[source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="secondary"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
val factory = DefaultListableBeanFactory()
|
||||
val reader = XmlBeanDefinitionReader(factory)
|
||||
reader.loadBeanDefinitions(FileSystemResource("beans.xml"))
|
||||
|
||||
// bring in some property values from a Properties file
|
||||
val cfg = PropertySourcesPlaceholderConfigurer()
|
||||
cfg.setLocation(FileSystemResource("jdbc.properties"))
|
||||
|
||||
// now actually do the replacement
|
||||
cfg.postProcessBeanFactory(factory)
|
||||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
In both cases, the explicit registration steps are inconvenient, which is
|
||||
why the various `ApplicationContext` variants are preferred over a plain
|
||||
`DefaultListableBeanFactory` in Spring-backed applications, especially when
|
||||
relying on `BeanFactoryPostProcessor` and `BeanPostProcessor` instances for extended
|
||||
container functionality in a typical enterprise setup.
|
||||
|
||||
[NOTE]
|
||||
====
|
||||
An `AnnotationConfigApplicationContext` has all common annotation post-processors
|
||||
registered and may bring in additional processors underneath the
|
||||
covers through configuration annotations, such as `@EnableTransactionManagement`.
|
||||
At the abstraction level of Spring's annotation-based configuration model,
|
||||
the notion of bean post-processors becomes a mere internal container detail.
|
||||
====
|
||||
@@ -1,84 +0,0 @@
|
||||
[[beans-child-bean-definitions]]
|
||||
= Bean Definition Inheritance
|
||||
|
||||
A bean definition can contain a lot of configuration information, including constructor
|
||||
arguments, property values, and container-specific information, such as the initialization
|
||||
method, a static factory method name, and so on. A child bean definition inherits
|
||||
configuration data from a parent definition. The child definition can override some
|
||||
values or add others as needed. Using parent and child bean definitions can save a lot
|
||||
of typing. Effectively, this is a form of templating.
|
||||
|
||||
If you work with an `ApplicationContext` interface programmatically, child bean
|
||||
definitions are represented by the `ChildBeanDefinition` class. Most users do not work
|
||||
with them on this level. Instead, they configure bean definitions declaratively in a class
|
||||
such as the `ClassPathXmlApplicationContext`. When you use XML-based configuration
|
||||
metadata, you can indicate a child bean definition by using the `parent` attribute,
|
||||
specifying the parent bean as the value of this attribute. The following example shows how
|
||||
to do so:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<bean id="inheritedTestBean" abstract="true"
|
||||
class="org.springframework.beans.TestBean">
|
||||
<property name="name" value="parent"/>
|
||||
<property name="age" value="1"/>
|
||||
</bean>
|
||||
|
||||
<bean id="inheritsWithDifferentClass"
|
||||
class="org.springframework.beans.DerivedTestBean"
|
||||
parent="inheritedTestBean" init-method="initialize"> <1>
|
||||
<property name="name" value="override"/>
|
||||
<!-- the age property value of 1 will be inherited from parent -->
|
||||
</bean>
|
||||
----
|
||||
<1> Note the `parent` attribute.
|
||||
|
||||
A child bean definition uses the bean class from the parent definition if none is
|
||||
specified but can also override it. In the latter case, the child bean class must be
|
||||
compatible with the parent (that is, it must accept the parent's property values).
|
||||
|
||||
A child bean definition inherits scope, constructor argument values, property values, and
|
||||
method overrides from the parent, with the option to add new values. Any scope, initialization
|
||||
method, destroy method, or `static` factory method settings that you specify
|
||||
override the corresponding parent settings.
|
||||
|
||||
The remaining settings are always taken from the child definition: depends on,
|
||||
autowire mode, dependency check, singleton, and lazy init.
|
||||
|
||||
The preceding example explicitly marks the parent bean definition as abstract by using
|
||||
the `abstract` attribute. If the parent definition does not specify a class, explicitly
|
||||
marking the parent bean definition as `abstract` is required, as the following example
|
||||
shows:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,xml,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
<bean id="inheritedTestBeanWithoutClass" abstract="true">
|
||||
<property name="name" value="parent"/>
|
||||
<property name="age" value="1"/>
|
||||
</bean>
|
||||
|
||||
<bean id="inheritsWithClass" class="org.springframework.beans.DerivedTestBean"
|
||||
parent="inheritedTestBeanWithoutClass" init-method="initialize">
|
||||
<property name="name" value="override"/>
|
||||
<!-- age will inherit the value of 1 from the parent bean definition-->
|
||||
</bean>
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
The parent bean cannot be instantiated on its own because it is incomplete, and it is
|
||||
also explicitly marked as `abstract`. When a definition is `abstract`, it is
|
||||
usable only as a pure template bean definition that serves as a parent definition for
|
||||
child definitions. Trying to use such an `abstract` parent bean on its own, by referring
|
||||
to it as a ref property of another bean or doing an explicit `getBean()` call with the
|
||||
parent bean ID returns an error. Similarly, the container's internal
|
||||
`preInstantiateSingletons()` method ignores bean definitions that are defined as
|
||||
abstract.
|
||||
|
||||
NOTE: `ApplicationContext` pre-instantiates all singletons by default. Therefore, it is
|
||||
important (at least for singleton beans) that if you have a (parent) bean definition
|
||||
which you intend to use only as a template, and this definition specifies a class, you
|
||||
must make sure to set the __abstract__ attribute to __true__, otherwise the application
|
||||
context will actually (attempt to) pre-instantiate the `abstract` bean.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||